Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Dover Valley Residential Care Home

Small home·Licensed for 6·Fairfield, California

Licensed since 2003Licence #486801218
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,300 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,550–$5,350
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit5 of 6 beds occupiedJune 19, 2025 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitJanuary 29, 2026CDSS inspection record

Dover Valley Residential Care Home is a small care home in Fairfield — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2003. Dementia care and bedridden care are not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Dover Valley Residential Care Home

Is Dover Valley Residential Care Home licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Dover Valley Residential Care Home licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Dover Valley Residential Care Home been cited?

1 Type A and 1 Type B citations since 2003, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 12 state visits over the same years.

Is Dover Valley Residential Care Home still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Dover Valley Residential Care Home cost?

$4,300 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,550–$5,350. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes and similar homes within 15 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 5 other homes of a similar licensed size across Solano County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,721 to $5,000 a month, and the middle figure is $4,550 (n = 5 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Dover Valley Residential Care Home take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Juanillo, Cecilia, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Northbay Medical Center is 2 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Dover Valley Residential Care Home keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 3 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Dover Valley Residential Care Home license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “DOVER VALLEY RESIDENTIAL CARE HOME”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #486801218. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Juanillo, Cecilia, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2003, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 12 state inspection visits since 2003, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 1 Type A and 1 Type B citations on file since 2003, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 12 state visits in that period.
  • 2 complaints and 2 substantiated allegations on file since 2003, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is January 29, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved by the state
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 3 residents
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER.SIX MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY.HOSPICE WAIVER FOR THREE(3)RESIDENTS.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 3 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

Care & day-to-day support

These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,300a month to start

Likely $3,550–$5,350

From 8 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,300a month

Likely $3,550–$5,550

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,300likely $3,550–$5,350

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes and similar homes within 15 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,550–$5,550
$4,300
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,150–$8,650
$6,300
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes and similar homes within 15 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

8 homes like this within 15 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,500–$5,500.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 8 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 752 Rosemary Court, Fairfield, CA 94533Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 11 documents for this home, and its records count 12 visits since 2003. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated January 29, 2026.

On file since
2021
State visits
12
Most recent visit
January 29, 2026
Occupied · June 19, 2025 visit
5 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 3 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated June 11, 2025 to June 19, 2025. 3 of the 3 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 3 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 3 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations1typical 0
  • Type B citations1typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations2typical 0
  • Total complaints2typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2003.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20261102025672202411020231102021110

The last 36 months — 9 of 11 documents

20261 state visit · 1 document
Jan 29, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

At approximately 9:45 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Stevenson arrived unannounced to conduct a required 1-year annual inspection and was greeted by facility Staff Imelda Mallari who has Designation of Facility Responsibility (RP). RP called Administrator who arrived at approximately 9:55 AM to assist with today's inspection Facility is a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) with six (6) residents in care. Facility has a Dementia Care Plan, and a Hospice waiver for three (3) and facility currently cares for two(2) hospice residents. Licensee recently modified home and applied for one (1) converted non-ambulatory bedrooms which the fire department granted on 08/13/2025. Facility is now approved for 6 non-ambulatory residents. At approximately 10:15 AM, LPA initiated a tour of the facility with House Manager and observed the following: Facility is a one story home, was a comfortable temperature, bright and facility was without odors. Passageways were free from obstructions. Water temperatures in residents' bathrooms measured within the allowable range of 105 to 120 degrees F per Title 22 regulations. LPA observed a supply of clean linens, and hygiene, incontinent care, and paper products available for residents. Residents' bedrooms were inspected and observed to have all the appropriate furnishings as outlined in Title 22 regulations. Cabinets containing cleaning supplies and other items that could pose a risk were observed locked. Facility has at least two days of perishable food and one week of non-perishable foods, as well as an emergency water supply. Facility also has an emergency generator available. Continued on LIC809-C... Continued for LIC809 LPA observed a number of unzipped and undated meat portions in the refrigerator, as well as, at least one instance of condiment sauce that required refrigeration after opening. A type B citation is being cited for violation of CCR 87555(b)(9) There is a shaded seating area in the backyard with outdoor space for activities. LPA inspected two locked sheds in the backyard which contained care equipment, holiday decorations, tools, and chemicals. LPA observed residents watching TV or reading in the common area and in their bedrooms. LPA observed games available to residents. Facility now has a dedicated internet access device and internet service available to residents in care and the telephone was tested an operational during inspection. At approximately 11:30 AM, LPA conducted file review and observed the following; Four (4) of (4) staff files had all required documentation including medical exams, criminal clearance and TB testing. At approximately 12:15 PM LPA observed the following: Six(6) of 6 residents files and all had required documentation. LPA observed resident (R1) sitting up comfortably in a wheelchair in the living room and dinning area, but is designated as "Bedridden" on their recent Physicians Report. A type B citation for violation of fire clearance CCR87606(c) with licensee asked to ensure R1 has a re-evaluation by their physician by Plan of Correction date and to notify LPA if they cannot secure that appointment. Licensee states that the facility and residents' family members coordinate residents' medical and dental appointments and transportation to and from visits. Medications and medication records were inspected and observed maintained in compliance with regulation. Facility does not handle P&I money LPA obtained the follow documents for the facility file today including: LIC500 Personnel Report LIC9020 Register of Facility Residents Updated Liability Insurance Two (2) LIC 308 Designation of Facility Responsibility Reviewed LIC610D Emergency Disaster Plan Continued on LIC809C Continued from LIC809C Deficiencies are cited from the California Code of Regulations (CCRs), and/or the Health and Safety Code. Failure to correct the cited deficiency(ies), on or before the Plan of Correction (POC) due date, may result in a civil penalty assessment. This report was reviewed with Edward Gadia and Appeal rights were giventhe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 29, 2026
20256 state visits · 7 documents
Sep 3, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Office

An office meeting was conducted today, 09/03/2025, in the Santa Rosa Regional Office. The following individuals were present in the meeting: Licensing Program Manager, Bethany Moellers, Licensing Program Analyst, Julie Florio, House Manager, Edward Gadia, and House Co-Manager, Lourdes Gadia. Licnesee/Administrator was unable to attend today's meeting. The Department has received some of the required documents to process a change of administrator to Edward Gadia. . The purpose of the office meeting was to hold an Informal meeting to address the following areas of concern identified by the Department: Administrator oversight Staff training Change of condition Seeking Timely Medical Care for Residents Required Change of Administrator Documents Requested: LIC 308 (Designation of Facility Responsibility) Active and Current Administrator Certificate First Aid Certificate LIC 500 (Personnel Report) Continued on LIC809C... Continued from LIC809... LIC 501 (Personnel Record) LIC 503 (Health Screening Report - personnel)Proof of Negative TB test LIC 9182 (Criminal Record Exemption Transfer Request) LIC 508 (Criminal Record Statement) Copy of Driver's License or Passport that is not expired Statement signed by Licensee requesting Change of Administrator Deficiencies were cited and civil penalties were assessed on Complaint Control Number 21-AS-20250314120850 regarding a violation that the Department determined constitutes the facility not seeking timely medical care for a resident, as defined in Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, Article 08. Exit interview conducted with Administrator whose signature on form confirms receipt of documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 3, 2025
Jun 19, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure that resident is wearing clean clothing

On 06/19/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Julie Florio arrived unannounced to deliver complaint 21-AS-20250321094711 investigation findings regarding the above allegation and met with Lourdes Gadia, Designated Responsible Party (DRP). Reporting Party (RP) alleges that the facility staff do not ensure that Resident 1 (R1) is wearing clean clothing. LPA Florio conducted 10-day complaint investigation visit on 03/27/2025 and obtained documents, made observations, and conducted interviews. During this visit, R1 was observed wearing clean clothing and no signs of soiled garmets. Additionally, during this visit, it was revealed through interviews with staff and House Manager (HM) and progress notes dated 03/15/2025-03/20/2025 that R1 refused personal care on more than one occasion, somtimes choosing to remain in the same clothes from the previous day. Based on observations made, interviews conducted, and records reviewed, the department received conflicting information. Continued on LIC9099C... Unsubstantiated Continued from LIC9099... Based on interviews conducted and records obtained, the allegation that the facility staff do not ensure that (R1) is wearing clean clothing is UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that a complaint allegation is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. No deficiencies cited. Exit interview conducted with DRP, whose signature on form confirms receipt of document(s).the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 19, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250321094711
Jun 19, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not administer medication as prescribed by doctor

On 06/19/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Julie Florio arrived unannounced to deliver complaint 21-AS-20250321094711 investigation findings regarding the above allegations and met with Lourdes Gadia, Designated Responsible Party (DRP). Reporting Party (RP) alleges that the facility staff did not administer medication as prescribed by doctor for Resident 1 (R1). LPA Florio conducted 10-day complaint investigation visit on 03/27/2025 and obtained documents, made observations, and conducted interviews. During this visit it was revealed through an interview with the House Manager (HM) and progress notes dated 03/15/2025-03/20/2025 that R1 refused medications on more than one occasion, R1 liked to count their pills on a napkin on the bedside table and take them when ready, and sometimes this resulted in pills being found in the bed. Continued on LIC9099C... Substantiated Continued from LIC9099... Further, the facility's staff training manual section on their medication administration policy, states "watch the resident take the medication. Stand by until medication is swallowed." Based on the above information, the facility did not administer R1's medications in accordance with their policy, per regulation, or as prescribed by their doctor. Based on interviews conducted and records obtained, the allegation that the facility staff did not administer medication as prescribed by doctor is SUBSTANTIATED. A finding that a complaint allegation is SUBSTANTIATED means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. Deficiency is cited from Title 22 Regulations, Division 6, (see LIC9099D). Exit interview conducted with DRP, whose signature on form confirms receipt of documents. Appeal rights provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 19, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250321094711

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87465(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 18, 2025

Incidental Medical and Dental Care: 87465(a)(4) The licensee shall assist residents with self administered medications as needed. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews conducted and documents obtained for R1, the facility staff did not ensure that R1 took their medications as directed by their doctor which poses/posed a potetnial health, safety, and/or personal rights violation to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 19, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee to submit proof of retraining with all staff on administration of medications in accordance with regulation and the facility's policy. Additionally, this training shall include a review of the required notification procedures when a resident... ...refuses medications, including an update to the facility's policy which accurately reflects regulatory reporting requirements to CCL by POC due date of 07/18/2025.

Jun 11, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Neglect, lack of supervision, facility did not seek timely medical

On 06/11/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Julie Florio arrived unannounced to deliver complaint 21-AS-20250314120850 investigation findings regarding the above allegation and met with Edward Gadia, House Manager. Reporting Party (RP) alleges that the facility did not seek timely medical for Resident 1 (R1). LPA Florio conducted 10-day complaint investigation visit on 03/19/2025 and obtained documents, made observations, and conducted interviews. During this visit it was revealed through an interview with the House Manager (HM) that there was a pressure injury present “probably a stage 1-2” that had not yet been evaluated and staged by R1’s primary care physician (PCP). Continued on LIC9099C... Substantiated Continued from LIC9099... Per progress noted dated 03/14/2025, HM was verbally notified by R1’s PCP to begin monitoring, turning, and repositioning R1, at which time HM observed the pressure injury. Further interviews with R1 and Staff 1 (S1), revealed that the facility was aware of R1's discomfort and the injury that was forming for at least a week prior to R1’s wound being evaluated and staged by their PCP and that visit was initiated by R1’s family on March 19, 2025. On March 24, 2025, LPA received a copy of R1’s Doctor’s Orders indicating the pressure injury was a “stage 2” pressure injury. Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, the facility was unable to provide proof of a medical assessment being sought for R1 in the time prior to the staging which resulted from the family’s efforts, (see LIC9099D). An immediate civil penalty in the amount of $500 if being issued during today's visit, (see LIC421IM). R1 was sent to the hospital for generalized weakness on 03/20/2025. At that time R1's family notified facility that R1 would not be returning. Based on interviews conducted and records obtained, the allegation that the facility did not seek timely medical for R1 is SUBSTANTIATED. A finding that a complaint allegation is SUBSTANTIATED means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. Deficiency is cited from Title 22 Regulations, Division 6, (see LIC9099D). The House Manager was informed that civil penalties are under review by the Department per Health and Safety Code 1569.49 (f). Exit interview conducted. Copy of report discussed and provided to House Manager, whose signature on form confirms receipt of documents. Appeal rights provided. Continued from LIC9099A... Further interviews with R1 and Staff 1 (S1), revealed that the facility was aware of R1's discomfort and the injury that was forming for at least a week prior to R1’s wound being evaluated and staged by their PCP and that visit was initiated by R1’s family on March 19, 2025. On March 24, 2025, LPA received a copy of R1’s Doctor’s Orders indicating the pressure injury was a “stage 2” pressure injury. Based on interviews and record review, the facility was unable to provide proof of a medical assessment being sought for R1 in the time prior to the staging which resulted from the family’s efforts. On 03/20/2025 R1 was sent to the hospital for generalized weakness. At that time R1's family notified the facility that R1 would not be returning. Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, the department received conflicting information. Based on interviews conducted and records obtained, the allegation that the facility failed to observe change of condition for R1 is UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that a complaint allegation is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. No deficiencies cited. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report discussed and provided to Licensee, whose signature on form confirms receipt of documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 11, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250314120850

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(a)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 12, 2025

Incidental Medical and Dental Care 87465(a)(2) The licensee shall provide assistance in meeting necessary medical and dental needs…. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on facility not ensuring R1 was sent out for timely medical evaluation of observed changes to R1's condition, resulting R1's family seeking medical attention and diagnosis of a stage 2 pressure injury, which posed an immediate health, safety, and personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 11, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee to submit self-certification that regulations 87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care and 87466 Observation of a Resident have been reviewed with facility staff and are understood to CCL by POC due date 06/12/2025.

Mar 27, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Julie Florio conducted a case management- incident inspection, on 3/27/25 at approximately 2:30 PM, and was greeted by Myrna Tugade, House Supervisor. LPA spoke with facility House Manager, Edward Gadia who arrived at approximately 3:00 PM. LPA was informed that the Licensee/Administrator is currently out of the country on vacation. LPA is conducting a case management visit to obtain more information regarding concerns the Department has about Administrator Qualifications and Duties due to recent complaints and incident reports received as well as observations made during LPA's initial annual inspection visit dated 2/27/2025 and subsequent visit on 03/19/2025. During the 02/27/2025 visit, LPA requested facility submit change of administrator documentation to CCL as required to be reported to the Department within 30-days of any such change. The Department has not yet received this request or information from the facility. Today, House Manager states that a change of administrator request and supporting documentation was submitted to the Department via email communications with a previous LPA in 2023. Today, LPA reviewed staff records and obtained copies of documents including a personnel roster/report. Additionally, LPA conducted interviews with two residents and two staff members present during today's visit. Based on observations made today and during the above mentioned facility visits, documents obtained, and interviews conducted, LPA needs to conduct further file review and investigation and will return to the facility at a later date to resolve this issue. No deficiencies are being cited during today's inspection. Exit interview conducted with House Manager, whose signature on form confirms receipt of documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 27, 2025
Mar 19, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Annual Continuation

At approximately 1:45 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Julie Florio arrived unannounced to conduct a case management -- annual continuation visit to review resident files, staff files, and medications and medication logs, and met with Edward Gadia, House Manager. At approximately 2:00 PM, LPA conducted file review. Four (4) staff and five (5) resident files were reviewed and LPA observed the following: Four (4) staff files reviewed were observed to have the required documentation per Title 22 regulations. LPA informed House Manager that all staff files shall have a physician health screening and proof of negative TB results and a record of the initial 40 hours of training completed to bring the facility back into compliance. The House manager agreed to bring the facility back into compliance with regulation immediately. All staff have proof of current First Aid and House Manager will have all staff complete CPR training to ensure there is always at least one CPR certified staff member on shift at the facility per regulation. LPA reviewed five (5) of five (5) resident files which were each observed to contain all the required documents per regulation. House manager agreed to ensure all care plans are reviewed and signed by each residents' responsible party no less than annually to remain in compliance with regulation. House Manager states that the facility and residents' family members coordinate residents' medical and dental appointments and transportation to and from visits. Medications and medication records were inspected and observed maintained in compliance with regulation. Facility does not handle P&I. No deficiencies cited during today's inspection. Exit interview conducted with House Manager whose signature on form confirms receipt of documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 19, 2025

The state marks this report as 5 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 1. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Feb 27, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

At approximately 12:30 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Julie Florio arrived unannounced to conduct a required 1-year annual inspection and was greeted by facility Staff. Edward Gadia, House Manager was contacted via telephone and arrived at approximately 12:45 PM. Facility is a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) with six (6) residents in care. Facility has a Dementia Care Plan, a Hospice waiver for three (3), and is approved for 6 non-ambulatory residents. Facility does not currently have any Hospice residents in care. At approximately 1:00 PM, LPA initiated a tour of the facility with House Manager and observed the following: Facility is a one story home, was a comfortable temperature, and passageways were free from obstructions. Water temperatures in residents' bathrooms measured within the allowable range of 105 to 120 degrees F per Title 22 regulations. LPA observed a supply of clean linens, and hygiene, incontinent care, and paper products available for residents. Residents' bedrooms were inspected and observed to have all the appropriate furnishings as outlined in Title 22 regulations. Cabinets containing cleaning supplies and other items that could pose a risk were observed locked. Facility has at least two days of perishable food and one week of non-perishable foods, as well as an emergency water supply. Medications were centrally stored and locked. There is a shaded seating area in the backyard with outdoor space for activities. LPA inspected two locked shed in the backyard which contained care equipment, holiday decorations, tools, and chemicals. LPA observed residents watching TV or reading in the common area and in their bedrooms. LPA observed games available to residents and House Manager states staff take the residents in the yard for exercise and facility staff discuss current events with residents daily. Facility does not have an internet access device designated for resident use, but House Manager agrees to purchase one immediately to bring the facility into compliance with regulation. Facility has internet service available to residents in care and the telephone was tested an operational during inspection. Continued on LIC809-C... Continued from LIC809C... Facility's fire extinguisher was observed charged and was last serviced 07/2024. Smoke and Carbon Monoxide detectors were tested and operational during inspection. Facility conducts quarterly disaster drills, and the most recent drill was conducted 12/2024. LPA observed the facility's infection control plan, several first aid kits, PPE, and emergency supplies. Facility has a generator for emergency preparedness. LPA reviewed facility's emergency disaster plan last updated 02/2024. House Manager stated they would like to update the facility Administrator to himself. Also, House Manager states that facility may be submitting an application for change of ownership within the next month. LPA discussed what needs to be submitted to CCL by the Licensee for this change to occur. LPA will return at a later date to complete the annual inspection. LPA will review resident files, staff files, and medications and medication logs during that visit. Facility does not manage P&I. Required Change of Administrator Documents: LIC 308 (Designation of Facility Responsibility) Active and Current Administrator Certificate First Aid Certificate LIC 500 (Personnel Report) LIC 501 (Personnel Record) LIC 503 (Health Screening Report - personnel) Proof of Negative TB test LIC 9182 (Criminal Record Exemption Transfer Request) LIC 508 (Criminal Record Statement) Copy of Driver's License or Passport that is not expired Statement signed by Licensee requesting Change of Administrator Updated copies of the following documents are to be submitted to CCL within 30 days of this visit: LIC610D - Emergency Disaster Plan (updated) No deficiencies were cited during inspection. Exit interview conducted with House Manager whose signature on form confirms receipt.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 27, 2025
20241 state visit · 1 document
Feb 12, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cassie Yang arrived unannounced to conduct an annual inspection utilizing the full CARE inspection tool. LPA met with caregivers Emily Rapadas and Edgar Rapadas who contacted Administrator, Edward Gadia, who arrived to the facility shortly afterwards. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. LPA and Administrator discussed changing Administrator on file. LPA requested a copy of Administrator Certificate to confirmed certification and will notify facility's assigned LPA of the following change. During today's inspection, LPA and Administrator conducted a tour of the interior and exterior of the facility to ensure the health and safety of residents in care. Areas toured included but not limited to: six resident bedrooms, two bathrooms, laundry room, staff room, office, kitchen, backyard and the common areas. LPA observed knives, toxins, and medications to be locked and inaccessible to residents in care. LPA observed the exterior of the facility to be free from tripping hazards. LPA observed smoke alarms and carbon monoxides to be present and in operating condition. LPA observed facility to have ample supple of linens, and Personal Protective Equipment. LPA observed facility to have 2+ days of perishable and 7+ days of nonperishable foods. In areas toured, no immediate health safety and personal rights violation was observed. LPA conducted a personnel and resident file review. LPA observed facility to have the required documents present on file. CARE inspection tool completed and facility is found to be in compliance. No deficiencies cited. At this time, LPA request a copy of LIC 500, Administrator Certificate and liability insurance to be emailed to LPA Yang by Friday February 16, 2024. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report will be emailed to Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 12, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

Find a detail about life at this home.

Rooms & the spaces they will use

  • Room types1 Bedroom · Semi-Private

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Visiting & staying involved

  • Transportation costs extraReported no

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Solano County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Solano County