Skip to main content
CovelightCare
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Saved homesGuided search
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Guided search
Diya Senior Care HomeLicense #435202599 · Covelight Care
Covelight CareDiya Senior Care HomeLicense #435202599 · 276 Clearpark Circle, San Jose, CA · (408) 629-0388Record printed from covelightcare.com — data as of the dates shown on each item.
Home/California/Santa Clara County/San Jose/Diya Senior Care Home
Map · 276 Clearpark Circle

© Protomaps © OpenStreetMap

Estimated starting rate$4,250/mo

Covelight estimate · likely $3,500–$5,250 · See costs

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question
  • (408) 629-0388

    From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

DS

Call Diya Senior Care Home

San Jose · Licensed for 6

(408) 629-0388

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Small home · Licensed for 6 · San Jose

Diya Senior Care Home

276 Clearpark Circle, San Jose, CA 95136 · Licensed since 2017

  • Overview
  • Care
  • Costs
  • Daily life
  • Location
  • State record

Diya Senior Care Home

Overview

Estimated starting rate

$4,250 a month

Covelight estimate · likely $3,500–$5,250 See costs

No openings reported

  • Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 26, 2026
  • Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record

Ask this home

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Care and support

  • Wheelchairup to 6 residents
  • Dementia
  • Hospiceup to 2 residents
  • Bedriddenup to 1 resident

Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER, 6 NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH 1 IS BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE APPROVED FOR 2.

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 2 — care may continue at the end of life

    State licensing record · October 26, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    State licensing record · October 26, 2026

We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Diya Senior Care Home: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight and help with medicines. When we check availability, we ask about these too.

Check availability

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,250a month to start

Likely $3,500–$5,250

From 8 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$4,250likely a month
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$4,250likely $3,500–$5,250

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,500–$5,450
$4,250
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,100–$8,650
$6,750
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Rates at nearby homes8 nearby homes publish starting rates of $2,500 to $4,200

$2,500$5,250

EstimateLikely rangeA nearby home’s published starting rate

8 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $2,600–$4,200.

  • Mayflower Care HomeSan Jose · 1.5 mi · Small home
    $4,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Safe Haven Villa Care HomeSan Jose · 1.5 mi · Small home
    $3,200Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Saint Michael Residential HomeSan Jose · 1.5 mi · Small home
    $2,700Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Pendar's Residential CareSan Jose · 2.0 mi · Small home
    $4,200Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Sandy's Residential Care HomeSan Jose · 2.0 mi · Small home
    $4,200Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Constantin's Care HomeSan Jose · 2.1 mi · Small home
    $2,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Oak Grove Residential Care HomeSan Jose · 2.4 mi · Small home
    $3,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Laurel Crest ManorSan Jose · 2.5 mi · Small home
    $4,200Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

Ask for the price

An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.

Daily life

Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.

The best way to see it is a visit.

Request a tour

Where it is

276 Clearpark Circle, San Jose, CA 95136Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

  1. 1Kaiser Foundation Hospital-San JoseHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list2.9 mi

Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).

Open directions ↗

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #435202599 · See the state’s own record ↗

The last 36 months — 5 of 9 documents

Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 1 “Unfounded”.

20263 state visits · 3 documents

Oct 20, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

We haven’t transcribed this report yet. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 17, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Simi Rai conducted an unannounced Required 1 Year visit. LPA Rai met with Administrator, Bani (Bhupinder) Kaur and stated the purpose of today's visit. LPA Rai observed 2 staff and 4 residents at the facility. During visit, LPA Rai toured the inside and outside of the facility. When touring the outside area of the facility, the exits were cleared of obstruction. LPA Rai toured the facility kitchen and observed food supply of at least 2 days of perishable food and at least 7 days of nonperishable food. Sharps and medications were locked in secured areas. LPA observed additional food supply areas and secured areas for cleaning supplies and laundry detergents. LPA Rai toured the facility to include 3 resident rooms, living room, dining room, kitchen and garage. 3 Out of 3 resident bedrooms had available bedding, drawers, and functioning lights. The facility bathroom had available soap, paper towels, and trash cans with lids. The hot water temperature in the bathroom sink was 108.8 degrees F. The facility has a second floor which has 3 staff rooms and 1 bathroom. Fire extinguisher was observed and inspected on 09/23/2025. Facility smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors were in working condition. The last disaster drills were conducted on 05/19/2026 and 06/12/2026. LPA Rai observed a complete first aid kit at the facility. LPA Rai reviewed facility records for 2 staff and 2 residents. LPA Rai reviewed resident medications and central stored medication records. No deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. This report was reviewed with Administrator, Bani (Bhupinder) Kaur and Administrator gave permission for staff Arlene Esteban to sign today's report. A copy of the report was provided. LIC 858 and LIC 859 were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 17, 2026
Feb 27, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Facility staff were unable to effectively communicate with resident due to a language barrier. Facility staff are not ensuring that residents are provided with activities while in care. Facility staff did not ensure resident was provided supervision wherein resident pushed another resident.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Simi Rai conducted an unannounced visit to conclude the complaint investigation. LPA Rai met with the Adminstrator, Bhupinder (Bani) Kaur and stated the purpose of today’s visit. On 11/17/2025, the Department received a complaint with the above allegations. On 11/26/2025, the Department conducted an initial investigation at the facility. Continuation on LIC 9099-C, Page 1 of 3. Unfounded Page 2 of 3. Facility staff were unable to effectively communicate with resident due to a language barrier. On 11/26/2025, LPA Rai interviewed 3 staff (S1-S2) including Administrator (ADM) Bani Kaur. ADM stated all facility staff are provided training in English and they are able to communicate with the ADM, other staff and residents. LPA Rai interviewed both staff present at the facility and S1 and S2 were able to communicate and understand in English. Both staff expressed the care and supervision needs of the residents at the facility and were able to explain the emergency plan of the facility. On 11/26/2026, LPA Rai interview 6 residents (R1-R6). 4 Out of 6 residents refused to be interviewed or were not able to provide information about the above allegation. R3 and R4 stated they are able to understand and communicate with the facility staff. R3 and R4 expressed they were able to communicate their needs to the facility staff and the facility staff would appropriately communicate back to them. During visit, LPA Rai observed facility staff S1 and S2 communicating with R3 and R4 and both residents were able to understand S1 and S2’s questions and answers. Based on review of staff training at random, 2 out of 2 staff completed 40 hours of staff training in English. Facility staff are not ensuring that residents are provided with activities while in care. On 11/26/2025, LPA Rai interviewed 3 staff (S1-S2) including Administrator (ADM) Bani Kaur. ADM stated there are multiple areas for residents to do activities in the facility which include the living room, dining room and their individual rooms. On 11/26/2026, LPA Rai interview 6 residents (R1-R6). 4 Out of 6 residents refused to be interviewed or were not able to provide information about the above allegation. R3 and R4 stated the facility staff do provide activities and the residents can decide if they want to part of the activities. R3 and R4 were able to show LPA Rai the facility’s activity calendar and point out the different areas of the facility to do the activities. R3 and R4 provided LPA Rai different activities they do in the dining room and their room. During visit on 11/26/2025, LPA Rai observed different areas with activities such as the activity cart which included games, puzzles, books, newspapers and other gaming cards which the residents requested. LPA Rai observed a piano and elliptical for residents to use. Based on review of facility activity calendar, facility staff are conducting 1 activity per day with the rest of the day for residents to conduct their own activities. Page 3 of 3. LPA Rai observed the resident rooms and observed each resident doing activities in their own rooms and activity supplies were present in the room pertain to resident’s choice and preferences. Facility staff did not ensure resident was provided supervision wherein resident pushed another resident. On 11/26/2025, LPA Rai interviewed 3 staff (S1-S2) including Administrator (ADM) Bani Kaur. ADM stated there was an incident on 11/11/2025 where resident R1 pushed resident R2 on the chest while R1 and R2 was in their room. ADM stated staff S1 was present in the room, in front of the residents, providing supervision and trying to de-escalate the verbal altercation. ADM stated once S1 observed the interaction between R1 and R2, S1 separated the residents into different areas of the facility. S1 stated he/she was supervising the residents in the room and trying to de-escalate the verbal altercation between R1 and R2. S1 stated once R1 pushed R2 on the chest. S1 separated both residents by taking R1 out of the room. Based on review of resident’s Progress Notes on 11/11/2025, staff documented resident R1 and R2’s altercation. On 11/26/2026, LPA Rai interview 6 residents (R1-R6). 4 Out of 6 residents refused to be interviewed or were not able to provide information about the above allegation. R3 and R4 are not aware of the incident that occurred on 11/11/2025 regarding R1 pushing R2 on the chest. Both staff stated the facility staff are always present at the facility and they are available to assist the residents. R3 and R4 could not recall a time when facility staff were not present at the facility. R1 and R2 did not want to speak with LPA Rai regarding the incident which occurred on 11/11/2025. The Department has completed the investigation of the above allegations. Based on interviews conducted and record reviews, the department has found that the above allegations were UNFOUNDED, meaning that the allegations were false, could not have happened and/or are without a reasonable basis. No deficiencies cited from California Code of Regulations, Title 22. This report was reviewed with Administrator, Bhupinder (Bani) Kaur and a copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 27, 2026 · control 26-AS-20251117140918

20251 state visit · 1 document

Sep 17, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David Marrufo conducted an unannounced Required 1 Year visit and met with Administrator (ADM) Bhupinder Kaur. During visit, LPA toured the facility inside and out. LPA toured the kitchen area and observed there to be locked drawers for sharp objects and cleaning supplies. LPA observed the kitchen refrigerator, two refrigerators in the garage, a freezer in the garage, and the pantry area. LPA observed there to be a perishable food supply of at least two days and a non-perishable food supply of at least seven days. LPA observed the first aid kit and found it to be complete. LPA observed two out of two bathrooms. Each bathroom had working lights and available soap and paper towels. The showers had shower chairs and grab bars. LPA observed the bathroom sink water temperatures to be 115 F to 117 F. LPA toured three out of three resident bedrooms. Each bedroom had working lights and available bedding and clothing storage areas. LPA tested the facility carbon monoxide detector and the smoke detectors in the facility hallways and bedrooms. The carbon monoxide detector and smoke detectors functioned properly when tested. See LIC809-C page for more information. Page 1 of 2. LPA toured the outside area and found the exterior exits to be complete. LPA reviewed six out of six resident records, including Centrally Stored Medication and Destruction Records, and found them to be complete. LPA reviewed two out of two resident Personal and Incidental Money Logs and found them to be complete. LPA reviewed four staff records and found them to be complete. The Emergency Disaster Drill Log indicates the last drill was conducted on 09/08/2025. No deficiencies were cited as per California Code of Regulations Title 22. During visit, LPA Marrufo obtained copies of the following forms: LIC500 Personnel Report Surety Bond LIC308 Designation of Administrative Responsibility LIC610 Emergency Disaster Plan Liability Insurance LIC400 Affidavit Regarding Client/Resident Cash Resources This report was reviewed with ADM Bhupinder Kaur and a copy of this report was provided. Page 2 of 2. END REPORTthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 17, 2025

20241 state visit · 1 document

Sep 30, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Steve Chang conducted an unannounced annual inspection visit, and met with Administrator (ADM) Bani Kaur. . 6 residents and 2 staff were observed in the facility. 3 resident files and 3 staff files were reviewed. LPA toured the facility inside out with ADM. License, Administrator Certificate, and personal rights posters were observed in the facility. Living room, kitchen, dinning room and two restrooms were inspected. Three shared resident bedrooms, and garage were inspected. Two day perishable food supplies and seven day nonperishable food supplies were observed sufficient. Medication closet, knives closet, and cleaning product closet were observed locked. Room temperature was at 70 degree F, and hot water temperature was at 106 degree F in facility. Second floor is not included in the facility scope. 1 office, 2 staff live-in room, a restroom, and living room were observed in the second floor. Fire extinguisher was serviced on 09/09/2024. The facility was equipped with fire alarm system, smoke and carbon monoxide detectors. Smoke detectors was tested by ADM, the smoker detectors were observed out of batteries. ADM changed the batteries immediately and were working fine. One of the bathroom was observed without non skid mat, ADM put a new non skid mat immediately. Flash lights, first aid box, and night light were observed in the facility. the last time the facility conducted the fire drill was on 7/5/2024. Front yard and backyard were inspected. There was no obstruction to block the walkways. Deficiency noted today. See LIC809-D. Exit interview was conducted with ADM. This report was provided to ADM for signature.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 30, 2024

The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Earlier years2021 to 2022 · 4 documents

20223 state visits · 3 documents

Dec 12, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident had access to hazardous object. Staff is not providing a comfortable environment for resident. Staff did not prevent inappropriate interactions between residents.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Steve Chang conducted an unannounced complaint Investigation visit to deliver the investigation findings, and met with administrator(ADM) Bani Kaur. On 12/06/2021, the Department received a complaint with the above allegations. On 12/10/2021, LPA Steve Chang conducted an initial 10 day inspection/investigation, and met with ADM. LPA interviewed ADM, 1 staff (S1) and 5 residents (R1 - R5). LPA requested resident's Physician’s Report, Appraisal/Needs and Service Plan and incident reports. LPA toured the facility with ADM. Continued on 9099-C. Page 1 of 3. Unsubstantiated Resident had access to hazardous object: On 12/10/2021, LPA reviewed the documents, an incident happened on 10/20/2021, a suspect resident (SR1), acted aggressively, and yelled to other resident. 911 was called by the facility, and SR1 was sent to Emergency Psychiatric Service (EMS) immediately. No one was hurt. On 12/10/2021 and 08/04/2022, LPA interviewed Administrator (ADM) and staff S1, both of them stated the residents could not access the knives. They stated knives were locked by the facility, and no resident had the key. They stated they never saw any resident accessed the knives in the facility. On 12/10/2021, LPA interviewed 5 residents (R1 - R5). None of them stated they could access the facility knives, and none of them stated they saw other residents accessed the knives. On the same days, LPA toured the facility inside out, and observed the facility knives were locked. On 9/21/2022, LPA interviewed 5 residents (R1 - R5). 5 Out of 5 stated they never saw any resident held the knife and threatened other residents. 5 Out of 5 stated they could not access the knives in the facility. On the same day, LPA interviewed ADM. ADM stated only the staff have the keys to access the knives in the facility. On 11/1/2022, LPA interviewed R1 and R2. They stated SR1 acted aggressively in the incident, but they did not see SR1 held the knives. Based on the investigation, observation, and interviews conducted, the facility knives were observed locked, all the residents stated they could not access the knives. All the residents stated they did not observe any resident held the knives. ADM and S1 stated no residents could access the knives. Continued on 9099-C. Page 2 of 3. Staff is not providing a comfortable environment for resident: Staff did not prevent inappropriate interactions between residents: On 12/10/2021 and 08/04/2022, LPA interviewed ADM and S1. Both them stated only resident SA1 had the aggressive behavior. ADM and S1 stated all other residents have no any history of aggressive behavior. ADM stated SA1 moved out from the facility on 10/21/2021. ADM stated the facility has the house rules to regulate residents' behaviors. ADM and S1 stated if the facility staff find the resident has the inappropriate or aggressive behavior, the staff will separate the aggressive resident from other residents immediately to protect other residents, and will redirect and to stabilize him/her. On 12/10/2021 and 9/21/2022, LPA interviewed 5 residents (R1 - R5). None of them stated they felt unsafe in the facility. All of them stated they never saw any resident held the knife and threatened other residents. All of them stated only SR1 had the aggressive behavior, and SR1 already moved out on 10/21/2021. None of them stated they were hit by other residents or hit by staff. All of them stated they never saw the altercations between residents. ADM provided LPA the email logs with social workers and psychiatric agency that ADM claimed that the facility tried the best to provide help to stabilize SA1. ADM stated the facility could not confirm that SA1 was stable, so the facility did not let SA1 came back to the facility. ADM stated the facility tried the best to provide a comfortable environment for resident. Based on the records reviewed and interviews conducted, the facility provided the supervision of care to residents. The facility took action on the resident's aggressive behavior. The facility tried the best to protect the residents. Based on investigation, observations, and interviews conducted, the Department found that the above allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. An unsubstantiated finding indicates that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the allegations did or did not occur. No citations noted at today’s complaint investigation visit. Exit interview was conducted with ADM. This report was provided to ADM.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 12, 2022 · control 26-AS-20211206154910
Nov 18, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained a fracture while in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Steve Chang conducted an unannounced complaint visit today to deliver the investigation findings of the above allegations and met with Administrator (ADM) Bani Kaur. On 4/22/2022, the Department received a complaint that the facility resident sustained a fracture while in care. On the same day, LPA conducted initial 10 day inspection/investigation, and met with ADM, staff and residents. LPA obtained the following facility records: resident's physician report, appraisal needs and service plan, admission agreement, medical records, and incident reports. Continued on 9099-C. Page 1 of 2. Unfounded Resident sustained a fracture while in care: On 4/22//2022, the Department reviewed R1's incident reports (IRs) dated 4/16/2022 and 4/18/2022, R1 had two separate fall accidents in the facility on 4/16/2022 and 4/18/2022. According to IRs, on 4/16/2022 R1 lost his/her balance and fell in the restroom. R1 was immediately sent to hospital, and was discharged on the same day. While on 4/18/2022, R1 attempted to pick up his/her water bottle from bed side, and fell on the floor and hurt his/her lower back. R1 was immediately sent to the hospital. On 6/13/2022, the Department obtained hospital medical records of R1. Based on medical record reviews, R1 had prior lumbar injuries. Based on R1's appraisal, R1 was ambulatory with no need for assistance. On 8/4/2022, LPA interviewed ADM, and two staff (S1, S2). All of them stated R1 had falls on 4/16/2022 and 4/18/2022, and was sent to hospital. ADM and S1 stated R1 had Lumbar injuries before R1 was admitted in the facility. Based on records reviewed and interviews conducted, R1 had lumbar injuries prior admission to the facility. R1 was ambulatory with no need for assistance for walking. The two fall incidents were un-witnessed, it happened in the restroom and in R1's bedroom. The Department has investigated the above allegations. Based on the investigation, observations, records reviewed, and interviews conducted, the Department found that the above allegations are UNFOUNDED, meaning that the allegation is false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. No citations noted at today’s compliant investigation visit. Exit interview was conducted with ADM. This report was provided to ADM for signature. Facility is not sanitary: On 08/04/2022, LPA conducted an investigation/inspection visit of the facility. During visit, LPA toured and inspected the following areas in the facility: living room, dining room, kitchen, 3 bedrooms and 2 bathrooms. During the inspection, LPA did not observe feces on the wall of residents' bedrooms. LPA observed bedrooms with no feces or smell. On 8/04/2022, LPA interviewed staff (S1) and 5 residents (R1 - R5). S1 stated the facility staff check and clean the resident bedrooms everyday. S1 denied there were feces on the wall of residents' bedrooms on 4/16/2022. All of 5 residents did not complain that the facility was unsanitary. Based on investigation, observations, and interviews conducted, the Department found that the above allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. An unsubstantiated finding indicates that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the allegations did or did not occur. No deficiencies or citations noted at today’s compliant investigation visit. Exit interview conducted with ADM. A copy of this report was provided to ADM.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 18, 2022 · control 26-AS-20220422092403
Sep 9, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Steve Chang conducted an unannounced annual inspection visit, and met with Administrator (ADM) BHUPINDER KAUR. Upon arrival, ADM took LPA body temperature, and checked LPA in the visitor log book. LPA toured the facility inside out with ADM. COVID posters were observed at main entrance and the facility. Screening station with masks, hand sanitizer, glove, thermometer and visitor log book was observed at the main entrance. Living room, kitchen, dinning room and two restrooms were inspected. All trash cans were observed with covers. One of the restroom did not have posters of washing hands. ADM stated ADM will put the posters of washing hands for 20 seconds in restroom in 3 days. No paper towel was observed in kitchen. Cloth towel were observed in kitchen. ADM stated ADM will put paper towels with holder in kitchen in 3 days. Three shared resident bedrooms, and laundry room were inspected. Two day perishable food supplies and seven day nonperishable food supplies were observed sufficient. Medication closet, knives closet, and cleaning product closet were observed locked. Room temperature was at 80 degree F, and hot water temperature was at 108 degree F in facility. 5 residents were observed in facility. Fire extinguisher was serviced on 09/08/2022. Front yard and backyard were inspected. There was no obstruction to block the walkways. The facility already submitted the Infection Control Plan to LPA. No citation were noted today. Exit interview was conducted with ADM. This report was provided to ADM for signature.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 9, 2022

20211 state visit · 1 document

Sep 15, 2021Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

At 3:35PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Steve Chang arrived at the facility, and met with administrator (ADM) Bhupinder Kaur. ADM conducted an infection control/prevention screening, and took LPA body temperature, then log LPA into the guest log book. LPA toured the faculty with ADM inside out. There are 3 client shared rooms, 2 restrooms at the first floor. There are two staff live-in rooms, one restroom, and ADM's office room on the second floor. LPA inspected kitchen, living room, and dinning room. LPA observed 6 clients (C1 - C6) in the facility. LPA observed another staff (S1) in the facility. The beds in the shared rooms were observed 6 feet apart. LPA inspected the food supplies, Two days perishable foods and seven non perishable foods were observed sufficient. Fire extinguisher's date was observed valid. Not all the trash cans were with covers in facility. ADM stated the facility will replace them to be trash cans with covers. LPA observed no paper towel with holder in the kitchen. ADM stated the facility will fix this issue with 3 days. The current roasters of staff and clients were obtained. Medication closet was observed locked. LPA inspected the PPE supplies. PPE supplies were observed sufficient. LPA discussed and reviewed LIC808, mitigation plan, with ADM. ADM stated the facility will follow the COVID protocol. No citation was issued for today's inspection. Exit interview was conducted with ADM. This report was provided to ADM to review and to sign. A copy of this report was emailed to ADM.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 15, 2021

5 of 6 beds were occupied at the February 27, 2026 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.

License holder

Diya Senior Care Corporation, licensed since 2017.

Operates 2 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

  • Diya Senior Care · San Jose
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2017, as the state’s facility page counts them
State visits on file
9
Total complaints
3
Substantiated allegations
0
Type A citations
0
Type B citations
0

These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2017, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.

Compare with homes the same size
This homeTypical
Type A citations00
Type B citations00
Substantiated allegations00
Total complaints30

“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.

What the state’s words mean
Routine visita visit the state records as “Required” — a scheduled visit, not one made in answer to a complaintSubstantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.

Open CDSS facility search ↗Report a record errorOperate this home? Respond or correct, free →
Frequently asked questions

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Diya Senior Care Home

Is Diya Senior Care Home licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

How many residents is Diya Senior Care Home licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Has Diya Senior Care Home been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2017, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 9 state visits over the same years.

Is Diya Senior Care Home still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.

What does Diya Senior Care Home cost?

$4,250 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,500–$5,250. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 50 other homes of a similar licensed size in San Jose that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,600 to $5,000 a month, and the middle figure is $4,200 (n = 50 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Diya Senior Care Home take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Diya Senior Care Corporation, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. See the homes licensed to Diya Senior Care Corporation — at least 2 on the state roster.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Kaiser Foundation Hospital-San Jose is 2.9 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Diya Senior Care Home keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 2 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Diya Senior Care Home license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “DIYA SENIOR CARE HOME”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #435202599. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed to Diya Senior Care Corporation, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2017, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 9 state inspection visits since 2017, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2017, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 9 state visits in that period.
  • 3 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2017, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is October 20, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Nearby

Other homes nearby

Licensed homes near this one in Santa Clara County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

  • Map

    San Jose · 0.3 mi

    Carlton Plaza of San Jose

    Large community · licensed for 183

    Starting rate

    $5,995 a month to start

    Listed by the home on its own website · October 27, 2026

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    San Jose · under 0.1 mi

    RGK Home Care

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,000 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,300–$4,950

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    San Jose · 0.2 mi

    Diya Senior Care

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,550 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,700–$5,600

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    San Jose · 0.2 mi

    DJ's Carehome Inc.

    Mid-size home · licensed for 8

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,850 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,800–$6,350

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    San Jose · 0.4 mi

    Blossom Valley Care Home

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,050 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,300–$4,950

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    San Jose · 0.5 mi

    Bluefield Manor

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,200 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,450–$5,200

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record

Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap

Explore Santa Clara County ↗

Do you run this home?

Add your photos, care details, and contact information. Your public profile is free.

Claim this home
Visiting in person? Print a visit sheetHow we source information
CallAsk this home
DS

Call Diya Senior Care Home

San Jose · Licensed for 6

(408) 629-0388

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Ask Diya Senior Care Home

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Covelight Care

A free directory of every licensed care home in California, built from CDSS public records.

Find your next step

Find a homeSaved homesHelp me chooseCheck a home

Make sense of care

Care guidesMedi-Cal & careYour rightsHow we workAbout this site

Work with Covelight

For professionalsFor home operatorsSuggest a correctionDevelopersContact us

© 2026 Covelight Care LLC. Homes never pay to appear or rank higher.

Covelight Care is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the sources named on this page.

3104 O St Unit #1023, Sacramento, CA 95816

PrivacyTermsText messages