Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Divine Manor Care

Small home·Licensed for 6·Rancho Cucamonga, California

Licensed since 2019Licence #361880818
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Starting rate$5,000 a monthListed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit5 of 6 beds occupiedSeptember 17, 2025 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitJanuary 7, 2026CDSS inspection record

Divine Manor Care is a small care home in Rancho Cucamonga — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2019.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Divine Manor Care

Is Divine Manor Care licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Divine Manor Care licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Divine Manor Care been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 7 state visits over the same years.

Is Divine Manor Care still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Divine Manor Care cost?

$5,000 a month to start — listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026.

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.

Among 8 other homes of a similar licensed size in Rancho Cucamonga that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,250 to $5,450 a month, and the middle figure is $4,500 (n = 8 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Divine Manor Care take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Divine Manor Care Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

San Antonio Regional Hospital is 2.6 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Divine Manor Care keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 5 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Divine Manor Care license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “DIVINE MANOR CARE INC”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #361880818. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Divine Manor Care Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 7 state inspection visits since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 7 state visits in that period.
  • 1 complaint and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is January 7, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 5 residents
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 1 resident

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR (6) NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH (1) MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR (5).

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 5 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

What it costs here

This home’s starting rate

$5,000a month to start

Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026 · See listing

Likely monthly total

$5,000a month

Likely $5,000–$5,600

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · where the price comes from
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$5,000this home

    The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $5,000–$5,600
$5,000
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $5,000–$9,100
$7,000
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.

12 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $4,000–$5,500.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 12 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 6367 Marble Ave, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 8 documents for this home, and its records count 7 visits since 2019. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated January 7, 2026.

On file since
2021
State visits
7
Most recent visit
January 7, 2026
Occupied · September 17, 2025 visit
5 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 2 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated May 16, 2024 to September 17, 2025. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (2). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 2 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 0
  • Total complaints1typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2019.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20261102025330202422020231102021110

The last 36 months — 7 of 8 documents

20261 state visit · 1 document
Jan 7, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) LaVette Farlow conducted an unannounced case management visit. LPA Farlow arrived at the facility to conduct a complaint investigation for compliant control 56-AS-20251230081815. LPA met with Lead Staff Lanperia "Ria" Simamora and was granted entry to the facility. During the investigation, Community Care Licensing Department discovered that the staff did not have access to residents file for review. LPA inquired about the residents file from Ria and she informed me that the Licensee is the only one with access to the file. Ria stated she does have the resident MARS. LPA Farlow contacted the Licensee Shreeta Yadav, and inquired about the residents file. Shreeta informed LPA that she only has access to residents file due to problems in the past and sensitive information in the file. LPA informed Shreeta it is required that the file are maintained at the facility and are available for review upon request. Due to LPA's inability to access and review residents files a deficiency was issued. During today’s visit, one (1) Type B deficiencies to the facility were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted where this report, LIC809, LIC809D, Appeal Rights were discussed and provided to Lead Staff Lanperia "Ria" Simamora.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 7, 2026

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87506(a) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 14, 2026

87506(a) The licensee shall ensure... complete, and current record is maintained for each resident in the facility or ...readily available to facility staff and to licensing agency staff. Based on interview and observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as evidence by not maintaining residents file and having files readily available for review, which poses a potential health, safety, or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 7, 2026

Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to maintain and ensure residents files are accessible and readily available for review.The Licensee agrees to submit a statement of understanding of the regulation by POC due date.

20253 state visits · 3 documents
Dec 2, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero made an unannounced visit to the facility. The purpose of the visit was to conduct a required comprehensive annual inspection. LPA met with Facility Administrator Shreeta Yadav and was granted entry to the facility. At the time of the visit there was two (2) staff present, and five (5) residents present. The facility is an five (5) bedroom, four (4), bathroom home, with a kitchen/dining area, living room, and attached garage. The facility is a Residential Care Facility for Elderly (RCFE) Licensed capacity is (6) current census (5). LPA was accompanied by Facility Administrator, to conduct a general overall inspection, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant: The facility is operating in the capacity approved by Community Care Licensing (CCL). There are no obstructions to indoor and outdoor passageways. The facility is maintained at a comfortable temperature. LPA inspected resident’s bedrooms; they are equipped with required furniture such as: mattresses, nightstands, storage space, and sufficient lighting; bathrooms were clean, and appliances were operating appropriately. LPA observed sufficient furniture and lighting throughout the facility. LPA measured and observed the water temperatures in the bathrooms to be 110.11 degrees F The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors and carbon monoxide alarms. Posters such as personal rights, the CCL complaint poster, and the disaster plan were posted in a common area. Cleaning supplies, toxins, sharps, and other dangerous items were kept inaccessible to residents in care. There was a designated storage space for resident/staff files. Medications are kept inside Med-cart inaccessible to residents in care. Overall, the facility is clean, in good repair, and operating in safe conditions for residents in care. Food Service: Non-perishable and perishable food supply is sufficient for number of residents in care. Care & Supervision: Facility has sufficient care staff for coverage 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. All staff members working in the facility have criminal record clearance through the department. Record Review: LPA reviewed three (3) resident files for admission agreements, updated physician reports, and needs and services plans. LPA also reviewed two (2) staff files for First Aid/CPR certification, criminal record clearance, training, and health screenings. Medications were audited at random and appeared to be dispensed appropriately by staff members. LPA observed last fire/disaster drill was conducted on 10/1/25. LPA also observed emergency disaster plan to be updated. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC809) was discussed and provided to Facility Administrator Shreeta Yadav.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 2, 2025
Sep 17, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident developed pressure ulcer while in care. Facility were not ensure residents care needs were being met.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with Facility Administrator Shreeta Yadav and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews, observations, and review of records. First allegation: Resident developed pressure ulcer while in care. Regarding the allegation stated above LPA conducted a review of records pertaining to Resident #1 during the review of records LPA observed that R#1 was admitted at Divine Manor on 9/9/2022 During further review LPA discovered based on Resident #1 documentation (pre-appraisal, physicians report), R#1 was admitted at the Facility with a stage 2 pressure ulcer already present. Furthermore, LPA observed that R#1 was receiving treatment for the wound by Home Health, documentation further indicated that no new ulcers were developed. In addition, LPA observed that R#1 was discharged on 9/29/2022. Furthermore, records also demonstrated that on 9/22/2022 per home health progress notes R#1 wound was improving based on treatment. Unsubstantiated Second allegation: Facility were not ensuring residents care needs were being met. Regarding the allegation stated above LPA conducted interviews with R#2, R#3, and R#4, LPA went over the allegation stated above and R#2-4, informed LPA that they have no concerns, and that the facility meets their care needs on the daily. In addition, R#2-4 informed LPA that they enjoy living at the facility and that they feel safe. LPA conducted interviews with S#1 and S#2 LPA went over the allegation stated above and staff #1-2 denied the allegation and informed LPA that staff always ensures that residents needs are always being met. Based on corroborating evidence obtained during the course of the investigation, LPA has determined that the above allegations are Unsubstantiated. Unsubstantiated: meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted where this report (LIC 9099) was discussed, and a copy was provided to Facility Administrator Shreeta Yadav at the end of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 17, 2025 · control 56-AS-20221031145150
Feb 4, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Health Checks

On 02/04/2025 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Raquel Hernandez conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to initiate a Case Management Health and Safety Check. LPA Hernandez was granted entry to the facility by staff Raymond Munsayac. LPA Hernandez met with Administrator Shreeta Yadav and explained the purpose of today's visit. During today's visit LPA Raquel Hernandez toured the facility. All (5) residents were present at the facility during Health and Safety Check. No immediate health and safety concerns were observed. LPA Hernandez observed indoor and outdoor passageway and no health are safety hazards were observed. LPA Hernandez observed sufficient staff to provide proper care and supervision to residents in care. LPA Hernandez inspected food supply and observed more than two (2) days supply of perishable food and more than seven (7) days supply of non-perishable food. Additionally, LPA Hernandez received documentation pertaining to incident reported. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Shreeta Yadav and a copy of this report (LIC809) was discussed and provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 4, 2025
20242 state visits · 2 documents
Nov 22, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) LaVette Farlow arrived unannounced to conduct the required annual visit to the facility. LPA met with Caregiver, Roldan Kiseo, and introduced self and stated purpose of the visit. Caregiver Roldan notified Administrator of my arrival and state the house manager will be arriving to the facility. LPA met with Carmen Holden and explain the purpose of the visit and a tour was conducted. LPA was informed that there are currently 5 residents in care and (1) resident in the hospital. The facility has 5 resident bedrooms, 3 bathrooms, kitchen, dining area, living room, attached garage, and backyard. LPA completed a walk through of facility, review of records and medication audit. Physical Plant: The facility is operating in the capacity approved by Community Care Licensing (CCL). There are no obstructions to indoor and outdoor passageways. The facility is maintained at a comfortable temperature of 75 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA inspected resident bedrooms; they are equipped with required furniture such as: mattresses, night stands, storage space, chairs and sufficient lighting. LPA inspected resident bathrooms; bathrooms were clean and appliances were found functional. Water temperatures tested at 107.2, 105.2, 109.1 and 107.7 degrees Fahrenheit. The facility is equipped with operational smoke detectors, carbon monoxide alarms, 3 fire extinguishers and emergency kit. Posters such as; the personal rights, ombudsman and emergency disaster plans were posted in a common area. LPA observed cleaning supplies, toxins, sharps, and other dangerous items locked in cabinets made inaccessible to residents. There was a designated storage space for resident/staff files. Medications were observed in a secured filing cabinet and inaccessible to residents. LPA observed two (2) out of two (2) residents MARS were not properly initialed. Technical violation issued. There are no firearms, ammunition, swimming pool or bodies of water. Overall, the facility is clean, in good repair, and operating in safe conditions for residents in care. Food Service: LPA observes that the facility did not maintain a sufficient amount of non-perishable and perishable food supply for 7 days for number of residents in care. Technical violation issued. Dishes, cups, and utensils were also stored properly. Yards/Outside: Two shaded patio, a side gate with self-latching handle on the right and left side of the house that leads into the backyard. All outdoor pathways were free of obstructions. Care & Supervision: Facility has sufficient care staff for coverage 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. All staff members working in the facility have criminal record clearance through the department. Record Review: LPA reviewed resident files for admission agreements, updated physician reports, and needs and services plans. LPA also reviewed staff files for First Aid/CPR certifications, criminal record clearances, trainings, and health screenings. LPA observed the Emergency Disaster Plan not signed and dated. Technical violation issued. LPA observed emergency drills not conducted on each shift. Technical violation issued. Three technical violations were cited during this visit. An exit interview was conducted where this report LIC809, LIC809C, and LIC9102TV were discussed and copies were provided to Administrator Shreeta Yadav.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 22, 2024
May 16, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff failed to provide residents proper supervision resulting in excessive falls and serious injuries Facility staff are not adequately trained

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Yolanda Delgado arrived unannounced to the facility to conclude an investigation into the allegations listed above. LPA met with Raymond Munsayac, Caregiver and explained the purpose of the visit. During the course of the investigation, records were reviewed, and interviews were conducted with facility staff members and residents. On August 25, 2020, Community Care Licensing received a complaint alleging facility staff failed to provide residents proper supervision resulting in excessive falls resulting and serious injuries and facility staff are not adequately trained. Regarding the allegation that “facility staff failed to provide residents proper supervision resulting in excessive falls and serious injuries”, facility records revealed that facility reported falls for Residents #2 and #3 to licensing and facility staff provided first aid, notified Hospice Agency for R2, called 911 for medical attention for R3. Interviews with staff denied that facility staff failed to provide proper supervision resulting in excessive falls and serious injuries, interviews with R3 could not corroborate allegation and R2 is not able to be interviewed. . Regarding allegation that “facility staff are not adequately trained”, facility records revealed that that facility staff had been trained on providing care, supervision, medication management. Interviews with staff denied that facility staff are not adequately trained. Interviews with R3 could not corroborate allegation and R1,R2 is not able to be interviewed. Therefore, the allegations of facility staff failed to provide residents proper supervision resulting in excessive falls and serious injuries and facility staff are not adequately trained is Unsubstantiated. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted with Raymond Munsayac and a copy of this report along with LIC811- Confidential Names list was provided. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 16, 2024 · control 18-AS-20200825133437
20231 state visit · 1 document
Dec 11, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero made an unannounced visit to the facility. The purpose of the visit was to conduct a required comprehensive annual inspection. LPA met with Facility Administrator Shreeta Yadav and was granted entry to the facility. At the time of the visit there was two (2) staff present, and five (5) residents present. The facility is an five (5) bedroom, four (4), bathroom home, with a kitchen/dining area, living room, and attached garage. The facility is a Residential Care Facility for Elderly (RCFE) Licensed capacity is (6) current census (5). LPA was accompanied by Facility Administrator, to conduct a general overall inspection, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant: The facility is operating in the capacity approved by Community Care Licensing (CCL). There are no obstructions to indoor and outdoor passageways. The facility is maintained at a comfortable temperature. LPA inspected resident’s bedrooms; they are equipped with required furniture such as: mattresses, nightstands, storage space, and sufficient lighting; bathrooms were clean, and appliances were operating appropriately. LPA observed sufficient furniture and lighting throughout the facility. LPA measured and observed the water temperatures in the bathrooms to be 110.11 degrees F The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors and carbon monoxide alarms. Posters such as personal rights, the CCL complaint poster, and the disaster plan were posted in a common area. Cleaning supplies, toxins, sharps, and other dangerous items were kept inaccessible to residents in care. There was a designated storage space for resident/staff files. Medications are kept inside Med-cart inaccessible to residents in care. Overall, the facility is clean, in good repair, and operating in safe conditions for residents in care. Food Service: Non-perishable and perishable food supply is sufficient for number of residents in care. Care & Supervision: Facility has sufficient care staff for coverage 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. All staff members working in the facility have criminal record clearance through the department. Record Review: LPA reviewed five (5) resident files for admission agreements, updated physician reports, and needs and services plans. LPA also reviewed three (3) staff files for First Aid/CPR certification, criminal record clearance, training, and health screenings. Medications were audited at random and appeared to be dispensed appropriately by staff members. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC809) was discussed and provided to Facility Administrator Shreeta Yadav.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 11, 2023
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in San Bernardino County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore San Bernardino County