This licence is listed as closed. The state lists it as “Closed, Change of Ownership”, September 27, 2026.

Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Cogir of North Bay

Large community·83 while this license was open·Vallejo, California

Closed in state recordLicence #486803810
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Home size83 while this license was openLarge care community · the state license record
  • Room at the last state visit54 of 83 beds occupiedDecember 8, 2025 · not a current opening
  • Licence holderWelltower Cogir Tenant LLC; Cogir Mngt USA Inc.Since 2019 · 5 licensed homes

Cogir of North Bay in Vallejo held a license for a large care community — a residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE). The license covered 83 residents, first issued in 2019. The state lists this licence as “Closed, Change of Ownership.”

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Cogir of North Bay

Is Cogir of North Bay licensed?

The state lists this license as “Closed, Change of Ownership,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Cogir of North Bay licensed for?

83 residents while this license was open — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Cogir of North Bay been cited?

1 Type A and 0 Type B citation since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 15 state visits over the same years.

Is Cogir of North Bay still open?

This license is listed as closed, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

What does Cogir of North Bay cost?

This license is listed as closed, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Among 9 other homes of a similar licensed size across Solano County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,474 to $4,321 a month, and the middle figure is $4,170 (n = 9 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Cogir of North Bay take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this license is listed as closed. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license was held by Welltower Cogir Tenant LLC; Cogir Mngt USA Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Can Cogir of North Bay keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is on this closed license’s record, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Cogir of North Bay license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “COGIR OF NORTH BAY”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #486803810. The state lists this license as “Closed, Change of Ownership,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • This license covered 83 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • This license was held by Welltower Cogir Tenant LLC; Cogir Mngt USA Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 15 state inspection visits since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 1 Type A and 0 Type B citation on file since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 15 state visits in that period.
  • 8 complaints and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is February 9, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 55 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 7 residents
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 28 AMBULATORY & 55 NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 7

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 7 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Typical starting rate

$4,150a month to start

Likely $2,800–$6,200

From homes this size in Solano County · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,150a month

Likely $2,800–$6,300

With a studio and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,150likely $2,800–$6,200

    Too few nearby homes publish a rate, so this is the typical starting rate 9 communities with 50 or more beds publish in Solano County, with a wider likely range. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $2,800–$6,300
$4,150
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,700–$9,100
$6,150
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis license is listed as closed. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWhy this is a county figure

Too few nearby homes publish a rate, so this is the typical starting rate 9 communities with 50 or more beds publish in Solano County, with a wider likely range. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.

Where it is

  • 2261 Tuolumne St, Vallejo, CA 94589Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

A map position is not on file for this address.

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2022, the state has filed 15 documents for this home, and its records count 15 visits since 2019. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated February 9, 2026.

On file since
2022
State visits
15
Most recent visit
February 9, 2026
Occupied · December 8, 2025 visit
54 of 83 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 8 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated March 21, 2022 to December 8, 2025. 8 of the 8 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (7). 8 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 8 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations1typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 1
  • Substantiated allegations1typical 2
  • Total complaints8typical 6

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2019.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20261102025330202433020234512022330

The last 36 months — 8 of 15 documents

20261 state visit · 1 document
Feb 9, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

At approximately 9:25 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Magdaleno arrived unannounced to conduct a required 1-year annual inspection and met with Administrator Davina Barker. Facility is a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) with thirty-seven (37) residents in care. Facility has a Hospice waiver for seven (7) and is approved for twenty-eight (28) ambulatory and fifty-five (55) non-ambulatory residents. LPA reviewed the Facility's Staff Roster and found that all staff on-site were background cleared and associated to the facility per regulation. At approximately 10:00 AM, LPA initiated a tour of the facility with Administrator and observed the following: Facility is a four (4) story building, was a comfortable temperature, and passageways were free from obstructions. The fourth floor consists of independent living and is not under the purview of Community Care Licensing (CCL). Fire extinguishers were last inspected 10/25. Smoke and Carbon Monoxide detectors are hardwired and last inspected 10/25. Water temperature in a spot check of ten (10) resident sinks and one (1) hallway sink measured between 106.1- and 119.6 degrees F, which is within the allowable range of 105- to 120 degrees F per Title 22 regulations. LPA observed a supply of clean linens, hygiene, incontinent care, and paper products available for residents. Spot check of ten (10) Residents' bedrooms were observed to have all the appropriate furnishings as outlined in Title 22 regulations. Cabinets containing cleaning supplies and other items that could pose a risk were locked. LPA observed at least a two (2) day supply of perishable and seven (7) day supply of non-perishable food, as well as an emergency water supply. Food was found to be stored in a safe manner with open items covered. Continued LIC809C... Continued from LIC809... There is a shaded, outdoor seating area with room for activities. LPA observed activity rooms that included libraries, billiards, a salon, and a community center. LPA observed a robust activity schedule posted in prominent areas as well as daily and seasonal activities. Facility has an internet access device and internet available to residents in care, and the phone was observed operational during today's inspection. Facility conducts quarterly disaster drills, and the most recent drill was conducted 2/26. LPA reviewed emergency disaster plan which was last updated 10/25. LPA observed a supply of PPE, emergency supplies, a first aid kit, and flashlights. At approximately 12:00 PM LPA conducted a review of eight (8) resident records. All required documentation present. At approximately 1:00 PM LPA conducted review of eight (8) staff records. All required documentation present. At approximately 2:15 PM LPA and Lead MedTech conducted a spot check of medication and medication records. Medication is centrally stored and locked. Davina Barker Administrator Certificate 7002822740 expires 2/22/2026. All fees are current as of this time. Updated copies of the following documents shall be submitted to CCL within 30 days of this visit: Liability Insurance LIC500 - Personnel Report LIC308 - Designation of Responsibility LIC610E - Emergency Disaster Plan No deficiencies cited. Exit interview conducted with Administrator, whose signature on form confirms receipt.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 9, 2026
20253 state visits · 3 documents
Dec 8, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee not meeting care needs

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Magdaleno arrived unnanounced to continue a complaint investigation and deliver findings regarding the above allegation(s) and met with Administrator Davina Barker. Licensee not meeting care needs – Reporting Party (RP) alleges that facility does not maintain residents room leaving sanitation and fall hazards as well as medication mismanagement. During the course of this investigation LPA reviewed records, made observations, and conducted interviews. Review of Housekeeping Guidelines indicated standard tasks that are expected to be completed by housekeeping. Review of Housekeeping Checklist indicated housekeeping signing off and informing residents of completed cleaning. Review of the assigned task sheet indicated all tasks assigned to specific housekeepers including additional requests or comments from residents. Review of Resident Housekeeping Declination form indicated that residents are able to decline housekeeping services. Review of resident LIC602-Physician Report indicated that resident is capable of storing/administering own medication and has the capacity for self-care. Continued LIC9099C... Unsubstantiated Continued from LIC9099... Interviews with Housekeeping staff (S1, S2) indicated that resident rooms are split between them and tasks are completed and signed off in the order they are assigned. Further interviews with S1 and S2 indicated that certain residents will ask that only certain tasks be completed and housekeeping will oblige them. Interview with S2 indicated that should they find cleanliness issues not specifically outlined in a resident’s assigned tasks they will clean out of courtesy, as long as the resident agrees. Interview with Administrator indicated there have not been complaints from individual residents regarding housekeeping services. Interview with R1 indicated that facility staff are “really good” and provide assistance when required, however, R1 also stated they are very independent and do not require assistance with medication management or most Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). LPA observed R1 room to be heavily cluttered with objects scattered across the floor and counter tops and a litter box with cat feces. Upon subsequent visits, after R1 agreed to higher levels of cleaning, LPA observed R1’s room to be less cluttered with the floor free of objects and counter tops to be more organized. Although the allegation(s) may have happened or are valid, the Department has found there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation(s) are unsubstantiated. No deficiencies cited. Exit interview conducted with Administrator, whose signature on form confirms receipt.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 8, 2025 · control 21-AS-20251028103450
Mar 19, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility failed to safeguard residents belongings

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) A. Canela arrived unannounced for the purpose of gathering more information and delivering findings regarding the above allegation and met with Executive Director/Administrator, Tracy Freudendahl (S1). LPA previously toured the facility, resident (R1) room, toured parking lot, took statements and requested records. It was alleged the facility failed to safeguard residents belongings, when R1 was in the hospital. It was alleged R1s car had been driven and parked in another area and that there were things, including R1's checkbook and keys that were missing from the apartment. LPA toured the area and R1s vehicle was previously located in the front entrance parking lot. S1 had expressed that the car had been there for several months and it has not been moved since R1 left it there. LPA observed the vehicle appeared to have a low tire and observed there were several spider cobwebs around some tires, indicating the vehicle had been there and not moved for an undetermined time. Continue report see LIC9099-C Unsubstantiated LPA previously toured R1s room and observed the refrigerator had food items, R1s clothing items were still in the room. S1 stated the room has been locked, R1s family member was allowed entrance to the room and the facility is unaware if anything was taken by them as it was hard to communicate with them. S1 stated the room has been in the same order that R1 left it, when they went to the hospital. They are unaware of any keys/checkbook or if they are in the room or in possession of R1 or family. R1s daughter does not communicate with facility, but understands R1s daughter made arrangements for R1s vehicle to be picked up. S1 informed LPA that R1s family returned to the facility in January 2025 and took most of the items that were left in R1s room, and did not allow facility staff to document or do an inventory of what was taken. Facility expressed they have reached out to family regarding all of R1s belongings that were left and as of todays date, have not been picked up. Facility has inventoried and documented items left behind for R1 and boxed them. LPA did not get any information from R1s family member as they did not return LPAs call. Based on the above information, and statements received, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove or, disprove, the allegation did occur. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. No citations issued today.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 19, 2025 · control 21-AS-20241121135902
Feb 14, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

At approximately 9:00 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Robert Frank arrived unannounced to conduct a Required 1 Year visit and met with Executive Director (ED), Tracy Freudendahl. Facility provides care and assistance to Older Adults in Assisted Living. Fire clearance is approved for fifty-five (55) non-ambulatory and twenty-eight (28) ambulatory residents. There is an approved hospice waiver for seven (7) residents. The fourth (4th) floor of the facility houses an independent living population that rents apartment units on the property, these are not part of the Residential Care for the Elderly (RCFE) license. The facility has an emergency disaster plan as required. The facility has a required infection control plan. Upon arrival, LPA was informed that there were forty-four (44) residents in care. At approximately 9:25 AM LPA reviewed Facility Staff Roster and found that all staff members on site were background cleared and associated to the facility per regulation. At approximately 10:00 AM LPA toured the facility with ED Freudendahl. The facility was observed to be clean, orderly, and at a comfortable temperature during today's visit. All common areas, hallways, and bathrooms observed by the LPA had sufficient lighting. Bathrooms observed had grab bars, and non-slip mat/flooring for bathing/showering as needed. The facility has emergency supplies, including food and water to meet requirements of the 72-hour shelter in place. The kitchen was observed to have a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food. The facility offered a variety of menu options for the residents at each meal. Snacks are available for residents. Facility has a sufficient supply of cleaners, hygiene items, PPE supply, and paper products. All toxins/cleaners were locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Hot water temperatures for a sample size of ten (10) sinks were found to be within Title 22 regulations of 105 to 120 degrees Fahrenheit. The call system was tested in a resident's room and Caregiver response time was under two (2) minutes. Continued on 809-C... ...Continued from 809 Facility's smoke and carbon monoxide detectors and sprinkler system were last inspected 11/2024. All exits were observed to be unobstructed. All fire extinguishers were serviced and tagged 1/2025. The last fire drill was conducted on 1/23/2025. The facility conducts fire/emergency drills monthly. At approximately 11:30 AM LPA conducted a sample file review of seven (7) staff members. All staff members had appropriate documentation, proof of training and current 1st Aid and CPR certification on file. LPA also conducted a sample file review for eight (8) residents. Upon review, LPA observed residents to have appropriate documentation on file including current Service Plans and Physician's Reports. All medications were locked and inaccessible to residents in care. LPA conducted a spot check of five (5) residents’ medications and observed all documentation and medications to be in order and centrally stored. During the tour, residents were observed interacting with staff in common spaces, resting in their private apartments and mingling with family and amongst each other. . The facility provides an eclectic range of activities specified for their assisted living residents. The facility has a hair salon, billiards room, movie room and a country store. During the Inspection LPA observed live music being performed in one (1) of the common areas. Tracy Freudendahl’s Administrator Certification 7006788740 is current with an expiration date of 10/6/2025. LPA is requesting the following documents submitted to Community Care Licensing by 3/14/2025: LIC 308 Designation of Facility Responsibility LIC 500 Personnel Report LIC 610E Emergency Disaster Plan Copy of Current Liability Insurance No deficiencies cited during today's visit. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report discussed and provided to Administrator Freudendahl. Signature on form confirms receipt of documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 14, 2025
20243 state visits · 3 documents
Dec 16, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Personal Rights

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) A. Canela arrived unannounced for the purpose of continuing complaint investigation and was greeted by Executive Director/Administrator, Tracy Freudendahl. LPA took additional statements and requested records. It was alleged the personal rights of a resident were violated due to a lack of communication by facility staff. Resident R2 was ready to return to the facility after a hospital emergency visit and it was reported Hospital staff made several calls to the facility explaining R2 was ready to be discharged but they were not able to speak with Health Wellness director to coordinate discharge and were just allowed to leave messages by the front staff. It was reported R2 was admitted to the hospital on 8/9/2024 and on 8/13 hospital was trying to discharge R2, but was not able to discharge until 8/15. Continue report see LIC9099-C Unsubstantiated Facility denies the allegations and express they always try to expedite, and conduct assessments of the residents to ensure they can meet their needs. Staff stated they attempted to conduct a visit at the hospital for R2 but the person in charge of giving day passes was not available and staff could not get in as the hospital was not issuing passes. Although the allegation may be true, based on the above information, and statements received, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove or, disprove, the allegation did occur. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. No citations issued today.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 16, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240816133812
Aug 21, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure that residents are served foods of good quality Staff did not ensure that the facility is maintained in good repair

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) A. Canela arrived unannounced for the purpose of continuing complaint investigation regarding the above allegations and met with Executive Director/Administrator, Tracy Freudendahl. This investigation included site visits to the facility; statements taken and LPA observations. It has been alleged facility staff do not ensure that residents are served foods of good quality, in that foods are served burned or cold. LPA took several statements from residents and no one corroborated the allegation. Residents expressed they like the food and have never had an issue with food being burned or cold. It was also alleged staff did not ensure the facility is maintained in good repair in that the outside smoking area gazebo tent is torn to shreds and water fountains are not operational. LPA observed the tent is in perfect condition. Facility staff expressed it was replaced about a month and a half ago due to needing a new cover but it was never in shreds. LPA observed water fountain next to the activity room that is not operational and Executive Director explained they were turned off as a precaution ever since Covid-19. They will remove the water fountains as they have several areas with available water and hydrating carts. Although the allegation may be true, based on the above information, and statements received, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove or, disprove, the allegation did occur. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Report email. No citations issued today. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 21, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240620122804
Jan 12, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

LPA Hiratsuka conducted this unannounced annual visit. LPA toured with Executive Director Tracy Fruedendahl. The building for this facility has four floors but the first three are licensed by Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD). The forth floor is independent living and not subject to CCLD. This community is a mix of studio, one bedroom, and two bedroom apartments. Each apartment has a full bathroom and small kitchenette. There are common laundry rooms for residents on each floor. There are several outdoor areas for residents. There are common areas on each floor. Several resident and staff files were checked. The following shall be updated and submitted to CCLD by 02/10/2024: -LIC 500 facility personnel or staff schedule -LIC 308 designation of administrative responsibility -paperwork appointing current executive director -liability insurance Multiple topics were discussed No deficiencies cited.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 12, 2024
20231 state visit · 1 document
Oct 30, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Residents needs are not being met by facility

Licensing Program Analyst Leibert arrives unannounced for the purpose of delivering findings on this complaint. This investigation included site visits to the facility; statements taken from witnesses and parties; as well as review of documents obtained during the course of the investigation. It has been alleged that the facility has not met R1's needs in that R1 has missed medical appointments; has not set up R1's voice mail; and does not wear a durable medical device prescribed following surgery because staff do not assist R1. The following determinations are made: R1 lives relatively independently with occasional transportation provided by the facility and has not contracted with the facility for additional care; R1's care plan and physician's assessment indicate R1 does not need assistance with activities of daily living; R1's states that R1 has chosen to not attend appointments or wear the medical device on occasions in the recent past. Although the allegation may be true, based on statements and documents reviewed, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the allegation is or, is not, true. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Report left. No citations issued today. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 30, 2023 · control 21-AS-20231019125734

The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 1. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Who holds the licence

Welltower Cogir Tenant LLC; Cogir Mngt USA Inc., licensed since 2019, operates 5 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Other homes nearby

Licensed homes in Solano County. This home has no map location on the state record, so these are not ordered by distance. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Solano County