This licence is listed as closed. The state lists it as “Closed, Change of Ownership”, September 27, 2026.

Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Baron's Presidio University City

Small home·6 while this license was open·San Diego, California

Closed in state recordLicence #374603323
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Home size6 while this license was openSmall care home · the state license record
  • Room at the last state visit6 of 6 beds occupiedJuly 29, 2024 · not a current opening

Baron's Presidio University City in San Diego held a license for a small care home — a residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE). The license covered 6 residents, first issued in 2013. The state lists this licence as “Closed, Change of Ownership.”

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Baron's Presidio University City

Is Baron's Presidio University City licensed?

The state lists this license as “Closed, Change of Ownership,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Baron's Presidio University City licensed for?

6 residents while this license was open — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Baron's Presidio University City been cited?

0 Type A and 1 Type B citation since 2013, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 11 state visits over the same years.

Is Baron's Presidio University City still open?

This license is listed as closed, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

What does Baron's Presidio University City cost?

This license is listed as closed, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Among 49 other homes of a similar licensed size in San Diego that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,950 to $6,000 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 49 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Baron's Presidio University City take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this license is listed as closed. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license was held by Baron's Presidio Services, Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

UC San Diego Health La Jolla - Jacobs Medical Center & Sulpizio Cardiovascular Center is 1.4 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Baron's Presidio University City keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is on this closed license’s record, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Baron's Presidio University City license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “BARON'S PRESIDIO UNIVERSITY CITY”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #374603323. The state lists this license as “Closed, Change of Ownership,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • This license covered 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • This license was held by Baron's Presidio Services, Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2013, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 11 state inspection visits since 2013, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 1 Type B citation on file since 2013, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 11 state visits in that period.
  • 2 complaints and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 2013, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is August 31, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved by the state
  • BedriddenApproved by the state

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
FACILITY SERVES SIX (6) NON-AMBULATORY ELDERLY RESIDENTS; AGE 60 AND ABOVE. ONE (1) OF WHOM MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE CARE WAIVER APPROVED FOR TWO (2) WITH TOTAL CARE ADDENDUM.

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$5,950a month to start

Likely $4,900–$7,350

From 9 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$5,950a month

Likely $4,900–$7,500

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$5,950likely $4,900–$7,350

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,900–$7,500
$5,950
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $5,650–$10,500
$7,950
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis license is listed as closed. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

9 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $5,650–$8,750.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 9 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 6860 Condon Drive, San Diego, CA 92122Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 12 documents for this home, and its records count 11 visits since 2013. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated August 31, 2026.

On file since
2021
State visits
11
Most recent visit
August 31, 2026
Occupied · July 29, 2024 visit
6 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 2 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated July 18, 2024 to July 29, 2024. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 2 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations1typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations1typical 0
  • Total complaints2typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2013.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20263302025220202435120221102021110

The last 36 months — 10 of 12 documents

20263 state visits · 3 documents
Aug 31, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Manager sent this report to the licensee's last known address to cite a deficiency discovered during the course of an unrelated complaint investigation 08-AS-20251006104258, which was conducted by LPA Arian Golbaksh. While conducting file review for the above mentioned complaint investigation, it was noted that a resident with a Dementia diagnosis (identified as R1) required special observation/night supervision. Per staff interviews and notes on R1 by the facility, they were a known fall risk and had behaviors of wandering day and night. One staff interview indicated that while there were staff present during the night, they were not consistently awake. Another staff member interviewed revealed that R1 would call for help when they had a fall and staff would then go to assist R1. This interview also revealed that staff began leaving lights on at night to assist R1 with their nighttime wandering, hoping it would decrease R1's number of falls. Other staff member interviews shared accounts of R1 wandering out the front door at night and causing verbal disturbances to the neighborhood and other residents in the home. One outside source interviewed revealed concerns of there being no awake overnight staff, stating that administrative staff had initially informed them there would be but then shared that would be cut and only the live-in staff would be present. Another outside source interviewed shared that they made recommendations for 1:1 care for R1 but that the facility was unable to support that level of care with their staffing ratio. One (1) deficiency was cited and immediate civil penalty assessed for a violation that results in the absence of required supervision for a resident [ See attached LIC 809 (d) and LIC 421 IM]. A copy of this report, LIC 809(d), LIC 421 IM, along with Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058) were delivered via certified mail to the licensee's last known address.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 31, 2026

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87705(b)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 31, 2026

87705 Care of Persons with Dementia (b) Licensees shall be responsible for... (2) ...ensuring there is at least one night staff person awake and on duty... in addition to requirements specified in...Night Supervision. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on LPA interviews and file review, the licensee did not ensure awake night staff were present and on duty to provide a Dementia resident with overnight supervision as required, which posed an immediate health and safety risk to 1 out of 4 persons in care (R1).the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 31, 2026

Plan of correction: Facility is closed; POC is deemed cleared.

Jun 11, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: POC

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted a Plan of Correction visit. LPA was greeted and allowed entry into the facility by Staff, Esther Villar and Administrator, Agnieszka Norton. The purpose of today's visit was to verify if deficiencies issued on 05/26/26 have been corrected. On 05/26/26, the licensee was issued deficiencies for the following: Personal Rights; Infection Control; Emergency Plans; Personal Accommodations and Services; and Plan of Operation. The deficiencies were due on 06/04/26. Today, LPA reviewed deficiencies mentioned above. All have been corrected and cleared. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report along with Licensee Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) were provided to Administrator, Agnieszka Norton whose signature below confirms receipt of these rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 11, 2026
May 26, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted a Case Management - Deficiencies visit. LPA was greeted and allowed entry into the facility by Staff, Esther Villar and Administrator, Agnieszka Norton. LPA was at the facility for an unrelated issue. During the visit, deficiencies were observed. The required postings were not posted. Residents bedding did not contain the required elements to include mattress pads and flat sheets. The administrator was not aware of required PPE items, LPA explained the required items to obtain. Bathroom #2 did not have a non-skid shower mat or strips. There was a camera in use, located in the kitchen. The administrator didn't know if audio was involved and was not aware of the requirements for video surveillance. The camera was removed during the visit and the administrator stated they will no longer use the camera. The front gate had a metal latching device which was not locked at the time but has potential to be locked with a padlock. LPA explained the law and the metal latching device was removed. The disaster drill was reviewed. The drills are not be conducting according to law. The administrator is the assigned lead for their infection control plan. However, the administrator has not received the required training and was not familiar with the infection control plan. The administrator was not familiar with the Emergency Disaster plan and required training protocols. Also, the facility sketch does not match the layout of the facility. Deficiencies were observed and cited during the visit. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report along with Licensee Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) were provided to Administrator, Agnieszka Norton whose signature below confirms receipt of these rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 26, 2026

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 4, 2026

Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities. Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: To be accorded dignity in their personal relationships with staff, residents, and other persons. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and observations, the licensee did not provide 4 out of 4 [R1-R4] residents with dignity by having a camera recording the residents without consent, which poses a potential personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 26, 2026

Plan of correction: The administrator was not aware if audio was being used. The camera was unplugged and removed. The administrator stated they will no longer use cameras. POC corrected.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87468(c) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 4, 2026

Personal Rights. Licensees shall prominently post personal rights, nondiscrimination notice, and complaint information in areas accessible to residents, representatives, and the public. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and observations, the licensee did not post the required documentation for 4 out of 4 [R1-R4] residents, which poses a potential personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 26, 2026

Plan of correction: The administrator was not aware of the required postings. The administrator stated they will post all the required documentation by POC due date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: HSC 87470(a) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 4, 2026

Infection Control Requirements. A licensee shall ensure that infection control practices are maintained as follows: This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and observations, the licensee did not obtain required training on their infection control plan and do not have required PPE for staff to assist with 4 out of 4 residents [R1-R4], which poses a potential health and safety risk to residents on care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 26, 2026

Plan of correction: The administrator was not aware of required PPE and training regarding infection control plan. The administrator stated they will obtain the required PPE and necessary training by POC due date

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: HSC1569.695(c) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 4, 2026

Emergency Plans. A facility shall conduct a drill at least quarterly for each shift. The type of emergency...vary from quarter to quarter...scenarios. An actual evacuation of residents is not required during a drill. Documentation of the drills shall include the date, the type of emergency covered by the drill, and the names of staff participating in the drill. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and record review, the licensee did not conduct or document quarterly drills with various topics and requirements for 4 out of 4 [S1-S4] staff, which poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 26, 2026

Plan of correction: The administrator was not aware of various topics and documentation requirement. The administrator will conduct and document a disaster drill by the POC due date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87307(a)(3)(C) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 4, 2026

Personal Accommodations and Services. Clean linen, including blankets, bedspreads, top bed sheets, bottom bed sheets, pillow cases, mattress pads, bath towels, hand towels and wash cloths. The quantity shall be sufficient to permit changing at least once per week or more often when indicated to ensure that clean linen is in use by residents at all times. The linen shall be in good repair. The use of common wash cloths and towels shall be prohibited. Based on interviews and observations, the licensee did not have required bedding to include flat sheets and mattress pads on 4 out of 4 residents [R1-R4], which poses a potential health, safety and/or personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 26, 2026

Plan of correction: The administrator was not aware of bedding requirements for residents. The administrator will ensure all bedding is appropriate to law by POC due date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87208(a)(7) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 4, 2026

Plan of Operation. The licensee shall have... plan of operation for the facility. The licensee shall operate...1569.49. The plan and related materials shall be on file in the facility and shall be submitted to the licensing agency with the license application. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and observations, the licensee does not have a facility sketch that matches the actual floor plan of the facility for 4 out of 4 residents, which posed a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 26, 2026

Plan of correction: The administrator was not aware the facility sketch didn't match the layout of the facility and will submit a current updated sketch by POC due date.

20252 state visits · 2 documents
Dec 16, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arian Golbakhsh conducted an unannounced Case Management visit to the facility. LPA was welcomed by, identified themselves to, and discussed the purpose of the visit to caregiver Ester Villar. The purpose of LPA's visit was to follow up on a hospice exception request from the facility as well as answering questions from Administrator Angie Norton regarding the facility's planned change of ownership. During the visit, LPA consulted with Administrator Norton via telephone on the remaining items needed for the exception request as well as answering questions pertaining to the change of ownership process with the Centralized Applications Bureau (CAB). LPA observed no health and safety concerns during the visit. No deficiencies were cited during the visit. An exit interview was conducted with caregiver Villar to whom a copy of this report was provided to. Their signature below confirms receipt of this document.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 16, 2025
Jul 28, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arian Golbakhsh conducted an unannounced, required Annual Inspection. The facility file and personnel report was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was welcomed by, identified themselves to, and discussed the purpose of the visit to Caregiver Ester Villar. The facility's license shows a maximum capacity of six (6) non-ambulatory residents, one (1) of which may be bedridden. Additionally, the facility is approved for two (2) hospice waivers. During today’s inspection there were five (5) residents in care. Administrator Angie Norton arrived later during the visit. LPA and Caregiver Villar toured the interior and exterior of the facility and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Client bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows, screens, toilets, and showers were in working order. Hot water temperature at taps accessible to clients were all compliant: Bathroom sink in common bathroom 1 was 105F and common bathroom 2 read at 107F. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present, as well as Personal Protective Equipment. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and client activities. The facility contained at least two (2) days of perishable food, and at least seven (7) days non-perishable food, all safely stored. Cooking, dining equipment, and utensils were present. Knives were locked an kept inaccessible to residents in care. [Continued on LIC 809-C] [Continued from LIC 809] No toxic chemicals or poisons were accessible to clients. Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. No pools or bodies of water exist on the premises. Per Caregiver Villar, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Smoke and carbon monoxide detectors as well as emergency lighting were all in working order. Last staff fire drill conducted was on 2/25/25. First aid kit was complete and readily accessible. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. When inspecting the facility's fire extinguishers, LPA noted that there was no service tags on the extinguishers and the receipt of purchase was dated 8/21/2022. Administrator Norton stated they purchase new extinguishers annually but did not retain the receipt. As date of purchase could not be verified, a deficiency is being cited per Title 22 regulations and noted on the attached LIC 809D. In addition, a Civil Penalty is being assessed for a Zero Tolerance Violation regarding Fire Safety and are noted on the attached LIC 421IM in the amount of $500. LPA interviewed two (2) staff and two (2) clients, and interviews did not reveal any licensing or regulatory concerns. LPA reviewed facility records. The files reviewed by LPA contained required documents. Confidential records were stored in locked areas. One deficiency was cited during the inspection. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Norton to whom a copy of this report, the LIC 421IM, and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058) were provided. Their signature below confirms receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 28, 2025
20243 state visits · 5 documents
Aug 8, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Annual Continuation

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sabel Martinez conducted an unannounced Annual Continuation Inspection. The LPA identified himself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Caregiver Ester Villar. The facility was licensed for a capacity of six (6) non-ambulatory residents, of which one (1) may be bedridden. The facility also had a hospice care waiver approved for two (2) residents. The LPA reviewed the facility Infection Control Plan, Emergency Disaster Plan, and staff and resident records. There were not immediate concerns and the LPA provided technical advise. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good condition. No deficiencies were observed, nor cited on today's date. An exit interview was conducted with Caregiver Ester Villar, to whom a copy of this report, and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058), were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 8, 2024
Jul 29, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff hit resident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rebecca Ruiz conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA identified herself to, was greeted by, and explained the purpose of the visit to Caregiver Esther Villar. LPA spoke with Licensee Angie Norton via telephone during the visit. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews with staff, residents, and outside sources, record review, and a tour of the facility. It was alleged that Staff 1 (S1) hit Resident 1 (R1). Review of R1’s physician’s report and assessment documents revealed that R1 had a diagnosis of major cognitive impairment and was receiving care from an outside care provider. Interviews with staff and outside sources revealed that R1 had a history of becoming aggressive and combative during personal care, however, R1’s assessment records did not indicate that R1 had any aggression or inappropriate behaviors. Continued on LIC9099-C page... Substantiated Interviews with staff and outside sources revealed that on 12/19/2023, an outside care provider was providing personal care services to R1 when R1 became aggressive. Statements made by outside sources and staff revealed that S1 entered R1’s room to assist the outside care provider. R1 remained agitated and attempted to hit S1 but did not make physical contact with S1. Outside sources revealed that S1 hit the right side of R1’s face with S1’s hand following R1’s attempt to hit S1. Interviews with S1 stated that S1 was attempting to grab R1’s hands to prevent R1 from punching or hitting when S1’s hand accidentally hit R1’s face. Interviews with S1 and outside sources made conflicting statements regarding the details of the incident, however both parties agreed that S1’s hand made physical contact with R1’s face during personal care on 12/19/2023. Interviews with staff and outside sources revealed that R1 did not sustain any injuries or physical marks following the incident on 12/19/2023. The Department has investigated the above-mentioned allegation and based on interviews, the preponderance of the evidence has been met, therefore, this allegation is deemed substantiated. The following deficiency is cited per CA Code of Regulations Title 22 and noted on the attached LIC9099-D page. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee Angie Norton via telephone and Caregiver Esther Villar, whose signature below confirms receipt of a copy of this report and the Licensee Appeal Rights (LIC9058 3/22).the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 29, 2024 · control 08-AS-20231221162314

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 26, 2024

87468.1 Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities (a) Residents… shall have all of the following personal rights: (1) to be accorded dignity with their personal relationships with staff… This requirement has not been met as evidenced by: Based on interviews, the Licensee did not ensure that Resident 1 was accorded with dignity when S1 hit R1 during personal care. This poses a potential personal rights risk to 6 of 6 residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 29, 2024

Plan of correction: Norton stated that the staff member is no longer working at the facility. Staff will receive vendor training on personal rights and will submit certificates of completion to the Department by POC due date of 8/26/2024.

Jul 18, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not address pests in the facility.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Sabel Martinez, conducted an unannounced a follow up complaint investigation visit, and delivered complaint findings. The LPA introduced himself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Caregiver Esther Villar. Administrator Angie Norton arrived during the visit and assisted the LPA. Throughout the investigation, the Department secured records and conducted interviews with external and internal sources, including staff and residents. It was alleged staff did not address pests in the facility. On 5/8/2024, it was reported to the Department spiders, and cockroaches were observed in the facility, and that the facility had not addressed the pest. Interviews with multiple external sources, who confirmed conducting several visits to the facility, reported not witnessing any pest at the facility, and not having concerns with pest at the facility. Some internal interviews also reported not having any concerns, and not witnessing any pest at the facility. (See LIC 9099-C for continuation of report.) Unsubstantiated Other internal sources did witness cockroaches, but also mentioned a pest control company had been hired to address the concern. The sighting of cockroaches had decreased or stopped since then. An interview with the administrator confirmed someone had report cockroaches at the facility, that the administrator had witnessed at least one dead cockroach at the facility, and a pest control company was hired. The administrator initial sprayed the facility with store bough products, prior to obtaining professional services. Receipts showed the pest control started services on 5/2024, and conducted a subsequent visit on 6/19/24. Although the pest control services were hired after the allegation was reported the Department, there was not enough evidence to prove the facility staff did not address the pest concern. Therefore, the allegation was Unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted with Norton, to whom a copy of this report, and Licensee/Appeals Rights (LIC 9058), were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 18, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240508163943
Jul 18, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sabel Martinez conducted a case management visit to obtain signatures and deliver an amended report. LPA met with Administrator Angie Norton, introduced himself and disclosed the purpose of the visit. Today's visit is to collect report signatures and deliver an amended report. An exit interview was conducted with Norton, to whom a copy of the this report, and Appeal Rights (LIC 9058), were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 18, 2024
Jul 18, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sabel Martinez conducted an unannounced Required Annual Inspection. The LPA identified himself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Administrator Angie Norton. The facility was licensed for a capacity of six (6) non-ambulatory residents, of which one (1) may be bedridden. The facility also had a hospice care waiver approved for two (2) residents. The LPA, accompanied by the administrator, toured the interior and exterior of the facility, and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstructions and slip hazards. Client bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows, screens, toilets, and showers were in working order. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, visitation, meetings, and client activities. There was at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days non-perishable food present, all safely stored. Cooking/dining equipment and utensils were present. There were no toxic chemicals/poisons accessible to clients. Medications were labeled, and stored in a locked area. No pools, nor bodies of water were observed on the premises. Per staff, no firearms, nor ammunition were kept at the facility. Due to time constraints, a follow up visit will need to be conducted to complete this required visit. No deficiencies were cited today. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Norton, to whom a copy of this report, and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058), were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 18, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Other homes nearby

Licensed homes in San Diego County near this one, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore San Diego County