This licence is listed as closed. The state lists it as “Closed, Change of Ownership”, September 13, 2026.

The state also lists Prince'cess Elder Care at this address under another licence.

Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Autumn Elder Care

Small home·6 while this license was open·Chatsworth, California

Closed in state recordLicence #197610091
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Home size6 while this license was openSmall care home · the state license record
  • Room at the last state visit3 of 6 beds occupiedJune 12, 2025 · not a current opening
  • Licence holderAm3 CorporationSince 2020 · 3 licensed homes

Autumn Elder Care in Chatsworth held a license for a small care home — a residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE). The license covered 6 residents, first issued in 2020. The state lists this licence as “Closed, Change of Ownership.”

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Autumn Elder Care

Is Autumn Elder Care licensed?

The state lists this license as “Closed, Change of Ownership,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is Autumn Elder Care licensed for?

6 residents while this license was open — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has Autumn Elder Care been cited?

3 Type A and 3 Type B citations since 2020, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 17 state visits over the same years.

Is Autumn Elder Care still open?

This license is listed as closed, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The state also lists Prince'cess Elder Care at this address under another license.

What does Autumn Elder Care cost?

This license is listed as closed, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Among 228 other homes of a similar licensed size across Los Angeles County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $6,300 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 228 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Autumn Elder Care take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this license is listed as closed. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license was held by Am3 Corporation, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Can Autumn Elder Care keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is on this closed license’s record, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Autumn Elder Care license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “AUTUMN ELDER CARE”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #197610091. The state lists this license as “Closed, Change of Ownership,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • This license covered 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • This license was held by Am3 Corporation, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2020, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 17 state inspection visits since 2020, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 3 Type A and 3 Type B citations on file since 2020, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 17 state visits in that period.
  • 5 complaints and 5 substantiated allegations on file since 2020, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is June 12, 2025, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 1 resident

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR (6) NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH (1) MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR (6). ALL BEDROOMS ARE CLEARED FOR BEDRIDDEN CLIENTS.

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

What it costs here

Typical starting rate

$5,000a month to start

Likely $3,650–$6,850

From homes this size in Los Angeles County · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$5,000a month

Likely $3,650–$6,950

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$5,000likely $3,650–$6,850

    Too few nearby homes publish a rate, so this is the typical starting rate 218 small homes publish in Los Angeles County, with a wider likely range. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,650–$6,950
$5,000
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,550–$9,800
$7,000
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis license is listed as closed. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWhy this is a county figure

Too few nearby homes publish a rate, so this is the typical starting rate 218 small homes publish in Los Angeles County, with a wider likely range. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.

Where it is

  • 10055 Sunnybrae Ave, Chatsworth, CA 91311Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

A map position is not on file for this address.

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 15 documents for this home, and its records count 17 visits since 2020. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated June 12, 2025.

On file since
2021
State visits
17
Most recent visit
June 12, 2025
Occupied at that visit
3 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 6 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated February 10, 2022 to June 12, 2025. 6 of the 6 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (4), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 6 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 6 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations3typical 0
  • Type B citations3typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations5typical 0
  • Total complaints5typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2020.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20251212024561202311020225522021110

The last 36 months — 9 of 15 documents

20251 state visit · 2 documents
Jun 12, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide proper notice of increase in rate.

At 09:15am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Angela Panushkina and Licensing Program Manager (LPM), Nichelle Gillyard conducted an unannounced visit in response to the above-mentioned allegation. LPA/LPM met with the Staff #1 (S1), who granted access to the facility. Administrator was contacted and the reason for the visit was explained. At 09:20am, LPA/LPM requested resident and staff roster. At 9:25am requested copies of pertinent information which include, but not limited to Physician’s report, Admission Agreement, Appraisal Needs and Services Plan, Resident Daily Log, relevant to the investigation. At approximately 9:30am, LPA/LPM conducted a physical plant tour, to ensure health and safety of the residents are protected. Between 9:50am – 11:00am, LPA/LPM interviewed one (1) staff, three (3) residents and one (1) witness. Continue on LIC9099-C Substantiated Allegation: Staff did not provide proper notice of increase in rate. It was alleged that the facility provided a rate increase notice for R1 due to the high level of care required by the staff. To investigate this allegation LPA/LPM conducted an interview with S1 and were informed that R1 was admitted to this facility on 04/18/25. R1 required full assistance with the Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). LPA/LPM were also informed that R1 would call at 2:00am and request to pull the pillow up or ask for an ice among other basic tasks. S1 provided copies of R1’s daily notes. LPA/LPM conducted review or R1’s daily notes and observed that R1’s level of care remained the same from April 20th, 2025 to May 30th, 2025. Additionally, LPA/LPA conducted review of R1’s Preplacement Appraisal and Appraisal Needs and Service plan (dated on 04/18/25) and Physician’s Report (dated on 04/18/25) and observed that both documents indicated that R1 had various health, mental and physical condition. LPA/LPM asked S1 about major change in R1’s health condition between April 18th, 2025, and May 31st, 2025, and there was no change in health or medical condition.Review of R1’s level of care appraisal letter submitted by the licensee (on 05/12/2025) did not specify and changes in R1’s health condition but expressed assistance with basic need and requests which include but not limited to asking for ice,straighten bed and pillow during late hours. This is not sufficient reason to increase the rent. No updated reappraisal was observed to support the letter. Therefore, the rate increase was invalid and improperly requested. Lastly, according to Health and Safety Code 1569.55, any increase in rates, require a (60 days) written notice, and the notice must include the reason for the increase, as well as a detailed description of the additional cost. Based on the interviews and record reviews, this allegation is Substantiated. Deficiency cited on LIC9099-D Exit interview conducted, appeal rights explained and copy of this report signed and delivered. Allegation: Staff inappropriately speaks to resident. It was alleged that Staff #1 (S1) inappropriately spoke to R1. To investigate this allegation LPA/LPM conducted an interview with S1, who denied the above allegation and informed LPA/LPM that he/she always assisted R1 and other residents with dignity and respect. In addition, three (3) residents interviewed expressed no concerns regarding this allegation. Interview also revealed that they have not witnessed nor heard staff inappropriately speak to R1 and or other residents. Lastly, interview with the witness revealed that the facility staff is very professional and he/she never witnessed S1 inappropriately speak to residents. Based on interviews there is insufficient pertinent information to support the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is Unsubstantiated, at this time. Exit interview conducted and copy of this report signed and delivered.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 12, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250605153846

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: HSC 1569.655(a) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 19, 2025

Increase in fee rates for elderly residents; 60 days’ written notice stating amount of and reasons for increase... (a) If a licensee of a residential care facility... setting forth the amount of the increase and the reason... including a description of the additional costs This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and record reviews, licensee did not comply with the section cited above, by issuing improper rate increas to R1, which poses/posed a potential health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 12, 2025

Plan of correction: POC is cleared during today's visit. LPA/LPM were informed that R1 moved out from the facility on 05/31/25

Jun 12, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Panushkina and Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Nichelle Gillyard, conducted unannounced visit to this facility in conjunction with a complaint control #31-AS-20250605153846. LPA met with the Staff #1 (S1) and explained the reason for the visit. During the physical plant tour, conducted at 9:30am, LPA/LPM observed the following: Kitchen cabinets were missing two (2) knobs and the cabinets were dirty and greasy. Refrigerator was dirty inside an out with food debrief The oven was dirty and greasy Room #3 walls had pealing paint and dirty marks. Room #3 window ledge was in disrepair Floor planks were in disrepair in various areas of the facility and can be a potential tripping hazard. The sliding door in the living room did not easily open. All bathroom cabinets have chipping paint and were soiled and dirty. The bathroom cabinet (in the master bedroom) was missing a knob. During the visit LPA/LPM discovered that there is an intent to sell the facility to one of the Staff. Health and Safety Code 1569.191(b)(2) was explained. Per the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, deficiencies are cited and noted on LIC809-D. Exit interview conducted, appeal rights and copy of report signed and delivered.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 12, 2025

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 19, 2025

Maintenance and Operation: (a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance shall include provision of maintenance services and procedures for the safety and well-being of residents... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on LPA/LPM observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not having a clean facility and in good repair, which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 12, 2025

Plan of correction: Administrator will clean, replace, repair anything indicated in this report. Licensee will clean, replace, repair anything that was missed during the physical plant tour. Plan will be emailed to LPA by POC date

20245 state visits · 6 documents
Oct 31, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

At 9:30 AM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Angela Panushkina and Huma Rahimi conducted an unannounced annual visit. LPAs met with the Eleonor Blass, Staff #1 (S1), who granted access to the facility and then contacted the Administrator. Administrator arrived shortly after and LPAs explained the reason for the visit. The facility is licensed for six (6) non-ambulatory, of which one (1) may be bedridden. All bedrooms are cleared for bedridden residents. In addition, the facility has a hospice waiver approved for six (6) residents. Kitchen: At approximately, 9:50am LPAs toured the kitchen area and observed enough supplies of staple non-perishable for minimum 1 week and perishable for 2 days at the facility. LPAs observed two (2) prescribed (narcotic) medications stored in the kitchen refrigerator and accessible to residents. LPAs did not observe a medication box nor a lock available. Facility currently has Dementia residents in care. Medications: At approximately, 10:00am LPAs observed medications are centrally stored and locked in a 6-drawer cabinet, by the kitchen. However, one (1) of the drawers (bottom, right) was broken and LPAs observed medications were accessible to residents in care. Bedrooms: There are four (4) bedrooms designated for residents use and have sufficient lighting. All bedrooms are clean and have appropriate bedding and linens. LPAs observe a two (2) top drawers in bedroom #1 were broken. Auditory alarms were tested and observed to be operational. One (1) bedroom is designated for live-in staff and during the tour, LPAs observed a window screen was loose. Bathrooms: At 10:25am LPAs observed two and half (2½ ) bathrooms are clean. Properly supplied with toilet papers, soap and paper towels. The hot water temperature measured between 126.1 and 127.2°F. LPAs observed appropriate grab bar and had non-skid mat. LPAs observed a bathroom window screen in Continue on LIC809-C room #5 was loose. All trash cans in bathrooms had fitted lids to protect from cross contamination. Smoke detectors/carbon monoxide. Smoke detectors were located throughout the facility, and at 10:30am they were tested and observed to be operational. Carbon monoxide was located by the entrance and also tested and observed to be operational. Common Areas: The facility maintains a comfortable temperature at 70°F. The living room and dining area appeared clean and were properly furnished. No obstructions and or tripping hazards throughout the facility. There is a fire extinguisher by the kitchen and was last serviced on 08/09/2024. Outside areas: At approximately, 11:50am LPAs toured the outside area of the facility. LPAs observed appropriate outdoor furniture, with a covered shaded area for residents. LPAs also observed a garden tool accessible to residents in care and old kitchen sink with old counter boards placed against the wall. LPAs requested all unnecessary items to be stored in a storage or thrown away. LPAs also discussed the importance of maintaining the care and supervision to meet the needs of residents. There are no bodies of water. The garage: Laundry area is located in an attached garage and LPAs observed all detergents kept locked and inaccessible to residents. Extra food storage was also observed. LPAs also observed hospice emergency kit in refrigerator. However, the box had no lock and it was accessible to residents in care. Between 11:55am to 1:30pm, LPAs reviewed records of five (5) residents and three (3) staff. Residents and staff records appeared to be complete and updated. Administrative: LPAs collected Certificate of Liability Insurance and LIC500. Deficiencies cited on LIC809-D. Exit interview conducted. Appeal rights explained and copy of this report signed and delivered.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 31, 2024
Jul 2, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Angela Panushkina and Leslie Ngo-Castaneda conducted unannounced visit to this facility. LPA met with the Administrator and explained the reason for the visit. During 06/21/24 visit conducted by LPA Panushkina, the facility had been issued three (3) deficiencies and the Administrator had to submit all Plan of Corrections (POC) by 06/28/24. LPA collected all proof and cleared POC's during today's visit. Exit interview conducted and copy of this report signed and delivered.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 2, 2024
Jun 21, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Panushkina, conducted unannounced visit to this facility in conjunction with a complaint control #31-AS-20240513103627. LPA met with the Designee and explained the reason for the visit. On 05/13/24, the Regional Office (RO) received a complaint and on 05/16/24, LPA conducted an initial complaint visit. After the final report was delivered, an Informal Meeting was conducted with the Administrator on 05/29/24 to discuss the deficiencies, and it was determined that an additional deficiency will be issued. Per the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, deficiencies are cited and noted on LIC809-D. Exit interview conducted, appeal rights and copy of report signed and delivered.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 21, 2024

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: HSC 1569.74(b)(6) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 28, 2024

(b) Any policy established pursuant to subdivision (a) shall meet all of the following conditions: (6) Facility staff are prohibited, on behalf of any resident... ...from being the legally recognized surrogate decision maker. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews, licensee did not comply with the section cited above by failing to communicate with R1 regarding changes in level of care and made a decision on R1's behaf by not accepting R1 back or potentially transferring R1 to her other facility/location, which poses/posed a potential health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 21, 2024

Plan of correction: Administrator agreed to complete a written statement of understanding on how the facility will follow section 1569.74(b)(6). Statement must be submitted to LPA by POC date

May 29, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Office

An informal meeting was held today at the Woodland Hills Regional Office to discuss recent deficiencies and provide guidance to ensure future compliance. Prior to the meeting, Licensee was given the chance to review the facility file. Present at today's meeting were the following: Myline Olivas - Administrator Nichelle Gillyard - Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Angela Panushkina - Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) The informal conference process was explained to the Licensee. The Licensee was also informed that this Informal Meeting can lead to an Administrative Action Process. BRIEF HISTORY: The facility Autum Elder Care has been in operation since licensure on 11/20/2020 From November 2020 to present, the Department received four (4) complaints, two of which were found Substantiated. Continue on LIC809-C LPM and LPA discussed reporting requirements. The Administrator has agreed to submit an incident report in regards to resident which was recently hospitalized. LPM clarified how the Plan of Correction days are counted. LPM will address Appeal in regards to Unusual Incident Reports. On 05/16/2024 an unannounced complaint visit was conducted by LPA Panushkina and the facility regarding the EVICTION PROCEDURES. LPA will continue and re-open an investigation to conduct interviews and if necessary, will issue an Amended report Exit interview conducted and copy of this report signed and delivered.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 29, 2024
May 16, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Illegal eviction.

This is an Amendment to the original report issued 05/16/2024. Additional information was added to clarify the investigation. At 10:00am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Panushkina conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit at this facility to investigate the above allegation. LPA met with the Administrator and explained the reason for the visit. During course of the investigation, interviews and record review were made. At 10:05am, LPA requested resident and staff roster. At 10:10am, LPA requested copies of pertinent information which include, but not limited to Admission Agreement, Physician’s Report, Appraisal Needs and Services Plan, Eviction Letter, etc., relevant to the investigation. At approximately 10:15am, LPA conducted a physical plant tour, to ensure health and safety of the residents are protected and physical plant is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. Continue on LIC9099-C Substantiated Between 10:20am – 12:30pm, LPA interviewed the Administrator, two (2) staff and two (2) out of six (6) residents, who were able to communicate. It was alleged that the facility did not accept R1 after hospital discharge. To investigate this allegation, LPA conducted an interview with the Administrator and was informed that upon R1's admission on 04/29/24, the Administrator attempted to arrange home health for R1's wound care. Five (5) Home Health agencies were contacted so that a proper medical care could be provided to R1. However, all five agencies refused/were unable to assign a Home Health to R1 due to insurance coverage limitations. On 05/09/24, was hospitalized and level of care for R1 changed; and therefore, the facility could not accept R1 back to the facility. Upon LPA’s request, the Administrator could not provide sufficient document regarding R1’s changes in the level of care. Additionally, the investigation revealed the Administrator did not submit the Eviction letter to the Community Care Department nor served a copy of 30-day Eviction notice to R1/family/representative. On 06/13/24, a telephonic interview with R1 revealed that R1 had anticipated going back, however, the hospital doctor stated that R1 requires a higher level of care. No re-appraisal and no conversation with R1 was done by the facility's Administrator to inform that the facility can no longer meet R1's needs based on what the hospital/doctor said. Based on interviews and record reviews this allegation is Substantiated at this time. Deficiency cited on LIC9099-D Exit interview conducted, appeal rights explained and copy of this report signed and delivered.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 16, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240513103627

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87224(a) · Plan of correction due date: May 23, 2024

Eviction Procedures-The licensee may, upon thirty (30) days written notice to the resident, evict the resident for development of a need not previously identified. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based interviews and record reviews, licensee did not comply with the section cited above, by failing to properly evict R1. On 05/09/24, R1 was hospitalized and not accepted back to the facility, which poses/posed a potential health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 16, 2024

Plan of correction: Licensee will ensure that Title 22 Regulations are followed for eviction procedures. Administrator will send statement that any resident that is evicted will be afforded the ability to go through the proper eviction process.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87463(a) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 28, 2024

Reappraisals: (a) The pre-admission appraisal shall be updated, in writing as frequently as necessary to note significant changes and to keep the appraisal accurate. The reappraisals shall document changes in the resident's physical, medical... This requirement is not met as evidenced by Based on interview and record reviews, licensee did not comply with the section cited above. Adminsitrator confirmed that upon R1's discharge from the hospital, R1's reappraisal was not updated, which poses/posed a potential health and safety risk to resident in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 16, 2024

Plan of correction: Administrator agreed to submit a statement of understanding on how all residents will have a proper reappraisal when changes occur and discharged from the hospital to ensure their needs are met. Proof of statement shall be submitted to LPA by POC date.

May 16, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Panushkina, conducted unannounced visit to this facility in conjunction with a complaint control #31-AS-20240513103627. LPA met with the Administrator and explained the reason for the visit. During the visit, LPAs was informed that per R1's doctors' request, R1 was taken to Northridge Hospital on 05/09/24, where it was determined that R1 had to be hospitalized. However, no incident report was submitted to the Community Care Licensing Department (CCLD) in a timely manner. LPA reviewed all incident reports on a system and did not observe an Incident Report regarding R1. In addition, the Administrator admitted that no incident was submitted to the Regional Office (RO). Based on Title 22 Regulation: a written Unusual Incident / Injury Report shall be submitted to CCLD within seven (7) days of occurrence. LPAs informed the Administrator that all staff members are mandated reporters and they are all responsible for reporting. LPA informed the Administrator to submit an incident report that occurred on: 05/09/24 (one incident) Per the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, deficiencies are cited and noted on LIC 809D. Exit interview conducted, appeal rights and copy of report signed and delivered.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 16, 2024

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87211(a)(1)A,B&D · Plan of correction due date: May 23, 2024

Requirements (a) Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency such reports... (1) A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency and to the person... ... any of the events specified in (A), (B) & (D)... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and record reviews, conducted by LPA, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by failing to notify CCLD regarding R1's hospitalization on 05/09/24, which poses a potential health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 16, 2024

Plan of correction: Licensee shall ensure a written report is submitted to the licensing agency and to the person responsible for the resident within seven (7) days of the occurrence of any of the events. R1's incident report shall be submitted to LPA by POC date.

20231 state visit · 1 document
Oct 5, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

At 12:15pm Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs), Leslie Ngo-Castaneda, Angela Panushkina, and Huma Rahimi conducted an unannounced annual inspection at the facility mentioned above. LPAs were greeted by the staff, Sheila Reano who granted access to the facility. Administrator arrived shortly after and LPAs explained the reason for the visit. Physical tour was conducted with the Administrator and LPAs observed the following: Kitchen: At approximately, 12:20pm LPAs toured the kitchen area and observed enough supplies of staple non-perishable for minimum 1 week and perishable for 2 days at the facility. All knives and sharps observed to be locked in a drawer and inaccessible to clients in care. Fire extinguisher in the kitchen was purchased on 08/21/2023. Medications: At approximately, 12:35pm LPAs observed medications are centrally stored and locked in the dining room cabinet. Bedrooms: There are four (4) bedrooms designated for clients use with sufficient lighting. All bedrooms are properly furnished, clean and have appropriate bedding and linens. Staff bedroom was observed to be locked and inaccessible to clients in care. Bathrooms: At 12:45pm LPAs observed all bathrooms are clean and in good repair. Properly supplied with toilet papers, soap and paper towels. LPAs observed appropriate grab bar and client's bathroom had non-skid mat. LPAs observed appropriate hand washing signs posted in each bathroom. All trash cans in bathrooms had fitted lids to protect from cross contamination. Hot water temperature measured at 111°F. Common Areas: The facility maintains a comfortable temperature at 73°F. The living room and dining area Continue on LIC9099-C appeared clean and were properly furnished. The living room has a television, comfortable furniture and the fireplace is adequately screened. No obstructions and or tripping hazards throughout the facility. Laundry is located in the attached garage that can be accessed through the living room. LPAs observed all detergents locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Extra PPE supplies and food storage was also observed. Smoke detectors/carbon monoxide. Smoke detectors were located throughout the facility, and at 1:20pm they were tested and observed to be operational. Carbon monoxide was located in a hallway and was also tested and observed to be operational. Outside areas: At approximately, 1:25pm LPAs toured the outside area of the facility. LPAs observed appropriate outdoor furniture, with a covered shaded area for clients. There is no bodies of water. LPAs discussed the importance of maintaining the care and supervision to meet the needs of clients. Between 2:20 to 2:50pm, LPAs reviewed records of four (4) clients and two (2) staff. Client and staff records appeared to be complete and updated. Administrative: LPAs collected Certificate of Liability Insurance, and LIC.500. No citations issued during this visit. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report emailed to the Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 5, 2023
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Who holds the licence

Am3 Corporation, licensed since 2020, operates 3 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Other homes nearby

Licensed homes in Los Angeles County. This home has no map location on the state record, so these are not ordered by distance. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Los Angeles County