Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Angel's Haven Care Assisted Living Elsinore

Small home·Licensed for 6·Lake Elsinore, California

Licensed since 2024Licence #335530240
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,900 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $4,000–$6,050
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit6 of 6 beds occupiedApril 29, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitApril 29, 2026CDSS inspection record

Angel's Haven Care Assisted Living Elsinore is a small care home in Lake Elsinore — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2024. Dementia care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Angel's Haven Care Assisted Living Elsinore

Is Angel's Haven Care Assisted Living Elsinore licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Angel's Haven Care Assisted Living Elsinore licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Angel's Haven Care Assisted Living Elsinore been cited?

1 Type A and 0 Type B citation since 2024, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 5 state visits over the same years.

Is Angel's Haven Care Assisted Living Elsinore still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Angel's Haven Care Assisted Living Elsinore cost?

$4,900 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,000–$6,050. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 19 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 5 other homes of a similar licensed size in Lake Elsinore that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,725 to $4,875 a month, and the middle figure is $4,400 (n = 5 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Angel's Haven Care Assisted Living Elsinore take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Angel's Haven Care Assisted Living Elsinore LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Menifee Global Medical Center is 4.5 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Angel's Haven Care Assisted Living Elsinore keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Angel's Haven Care Assisted Living Elsinore license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “ANGEL'S HAVEN CARE ASSISTED LIVING ELSINORE LLC”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #335530240. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Angel's Haven Care Assisted Living Elsinore LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2024, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 5 state inspection visits since 2024, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 1 Type A and 0 Type B citation on file since 2024, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 5 state visits in that period.
  • 2 complaints and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 2024, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is April 29, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved by the state
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 2 residents

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR SIX (6) NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH TWO (2) MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. BEDROOMS A AND D ARE CLEARED FOR BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER GRANTED FOR THREE (3).

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,900a month to start

Likely $4,000–$6,050

From 19 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,900a month

Likely $4,000–$6,200

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,900likely $4,000–$6,050

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 19 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,000–$6,200
$4,900
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,700–$9,300
$6,900
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 19 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

19 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,450–$4,500.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 19 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 36785 Braken Way, Lake Elsinore, CA 92532Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2024, the state has filed 5 documents for this home, and its records count 5 visits since 2024. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on April 29, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Substantiated.”

On file since
2024
State visits
5
Most recent visit
April 29, 2026
Occupied at that visit
6 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 2 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated September 11, 2025 to April 29, 2026. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 2 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations1typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations1typical 0
  • Total complaints2typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2024.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202611120252202024220

The last 36 months — 5 of 5 documents

20261 state visit · 1 document
Apr 29, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff lock residents inside the facility.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Andrew Martinez made an unannounced visit to the facility to initiate a complaint investigation and deliver findings for the above allegation. LPA met with Caregiver, Gilbert Oteyza, and explained the purpose for today's visit. The investigation consisted of observations, record reviews, and interviews with pertinent parties. Regarding the allegation - Staff lock residents inside the facility: During facility tour, LPA observed a child-proof door lever latch lock located on the inside of the entryway (front) door. LPA interviewed two (2) staff caregivers (S1, S2), both of whom stated the lever latch lock was installed to safeguard Resident 1 (R1) from eloping again as they like to open doors and have prior elopement history. LPA observed the front door is equipped with a signal system to notify staff when door has been opened. Based on today's investigation, the above allegation is SUBSTANTIATED. A SUBSTANTIATED finding is defined as a violation has occurred based on the preponderance of available evidence. An exit interview was conducted where this report LIC9099, LIC9099D and Appeal Rights were discussed and a copy provided to Caregiver, Gilbert Oteyza. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2026 · control 56-AS-20260422110040

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87705(e)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 30, 2026

(e) Licensees that use delayed egress devices on exterior doors... shall meet the following... requirements: (4) Residents who... indicate a desire to leave the facility following redirection shall be permitted... with staff supervision. The facility did not meet this requirement as evidenced by: Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section sited above by installing a child-proof door lever latch lock on the entryway (front) door making it inaccessible to residents in care wich poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risks to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2026

Plan of correction: Licensee shall remove the child-proof door lever latch lock from the inside of the front door within 24 hours. Licensee shall submit photographic proof of the removal of latch lock, review the stated regulation, and submit a statement of understanding of regulation reviewed to LPA via email by POC due date.

20252 state visits · 2 documents
Dec 23, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Hannah Rodgers conducted an unannounced Required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was welcomed by and discussed the purpose of the visit to Staff Armando Ramirez. The facility's license shows a maximum capacity of six (6) non-ambulatory residents, of whom two (2) may be bedridden. Hospice waiver for three (3). During today’s inspection there were fiveaq (5) residents in care. LPA with Staff Ramirez toured the interior and exterior of the facility and inspected each room. LPA observed the exterior perimeter gate to be locked with a padlock. Records review revealed that the facility does not maintain a fire clearance approval for locked exterior doors or perimeter fence gates. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Resident bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows, screens, toilets, and showers were in working order. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and resident activities. The facility contained at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days non-perishable food, all safely stored. Cooking, dining equipment, and utensils were present. No toxic chemicals or poisons were accessible to residents. Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. No pools or bodies of water exist on the premises. Per Staff Ramirez, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all in working order. First aid kits were complete and readily accessible. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. LPA reviewed facility records. Review of facility records revealed that the facility did not have documentation of required quarterly drills. Confidential records were stored in locked areas. Two deficiencies were cited and noted on the attached LIC809-D pages. Additionally, a civil penalty in the amount of $500 was assessed for the fire clearance violation and noted on the attached LIC421IM form. A plan of correction was jointly formulated, and an exit interview was conducted with Staff Ramirez, to whom a copy of this report, LIC809-C, LIC809-D, LIC421IM and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) were provided to.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 23, 2025
Sep 11, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not meeting resident's hygiene needs. Due to staff neglect, resident sustained pressure injury while in care. Staff are not meeting resident's toileting needs.

On 09/11/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Beena Singh conducted an unannounced complaint visit to the facility to deliver findings. LPA met with Facility Staff-Care Giver Gilbert Oteyza and discussed the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of observations, record reviews and interviews with pertinent parties. Regarding the First allegation, Staff are not meeting resident's hygiene needs. LPA Singh observe staff at the facility taking care of the hygiene needs of the residents. LPA Singh Interviewed two (2) staff and two (2) residents, Two(2) out of two(2) staff and two(2) out of three (3) Clients stated there are no concerns with staff not meeting hygiene needs of the residents. Also,Staff and residents stated that staff take good care of the hygiene needs of the residents in care. Second allegation: - Due to staff neglect, residents sustained pressure injury while in care. LPA Singh reviewed resident care records and observed staff providing good care to residents. Interviews with two (2) staff and two (2) residents reveal there are no concerns with staff care and no staff neglects residents and staff help residents in moving or transferring from bed, no issues of pressure injury. Unsubstantiated LPA Singh reviewed R#1’s records review and Resident #1 (R#1) record review showed a history of UTIs (urinary tract infections) and cellulitis. This medical history puts R#1 at a higher risk for skin breakdown. Despite this risk, staff are actively taking measures to prevent skin issues. Staff ensures R#1 is kept clean and dry and assist with turning in bed. It was also noted that R#1 prefers to use a bedpan without help from facility staff. Home Health care visited R#1 once a week and R#1 developed blisters on the legs after staying in the hospital for a week admitted on 07/28/2025, R#1 has been discharged from hospital to home on 08/06/2025. Home health visited facility twice a week for the wound care after R#1 sustained blisters during R#1's stay in the hospital. Third allegation: - Staff are not meeting residents’ toileting needs. Interviews with two (2) staff and two (2) residents reveal there are no concerns with Staff are not meeting residents’ toileting needs. Staff always help the residents in meeting the toileting needs of the residents in care. It was also noted that R#1 preferred to use a bedpan without help from facility staff. Based on the Department's investigation, the allegations- Staff are not meeting resident's hygiene needs, Due to staff neglect, resident sustained pressure injury while in care and Staff are not meeting resident's toileting needs above are Unsubstantiated. A finding of UNSUBSTANTIATED means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted where this report was discussed and a copy provided to Facility Staff-Care Giver Gilbert Oteyza.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 11, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250729201506
20242 state visits · 2 documents
Dec 16, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Prelicensing

On 12/16/2024 at 01:00 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melody Brown conducted an announced pre licensing visit for change of ownership at the facility. This is an announced Pre-Licensing visit conducted with Applicant/Administrator Ricardo Garcia who assisted in the tour of inside and outside of facility and the evaluation. LPA Melody Brown made a second (2nd) announced prelicensing visit this date. The follow up visit was made to confirm that all corrections have been made. The following: “Staff Training on Medication, Criminal Record Clearance obtained for Staff #3 (S3) and Transfer/Associate Staff #1 (S1) and Staff #2 (S2) criminal record clearance to the facility. All were found to be corrected on this visit date, 12/16/2024. However, due to S2 pending criminal record clearance transfer to the facility, Administrator/Applicant Garcia informed LPA Brown that they did not allow S2 to work at the facility until S2 criminal background clearance was transferred to the facility. LPA Brown cross reference Guardian database and noted S2 "In process" status. Staff #4 (S4) was observed working at the facility with criminal background clearance. The facility was evaluated in accordance with the CCR, Title 22 California Code of Regulations. Based on the observations and evaluation of the facility this date, the facility’s ready for licensure. Applicant/Administrator Garcia will be notified once facility is licensed. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report (LIC809) was discussed and provided with Applicant/Administrator Ricardo Garcia.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 16, 2024
Dec 4, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Prelicensing

On 12/04/2024 at 08:45 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melody Brown conducted an announced visit to the facility for the purpose of a Change of Ownership evaluation. LPA met with Administrator/Applicant Ricardo Garcia and Administrator Johnny Mazariegos. An initial application for change of ownership to operate a Residential Care for the Elderly facility (RCFE) was submitted to the Central Applications Bureau (CAB) on 06/13/2024 for a total capacity of six (6). Fire clearance was granted on 05/17/2024 for four non-ambulatory and two (2) bedridden residents. LPA Brown observed the following: Structure: Facility was a one-level house with five (5) bedrooms, three (3) resident/staff bathrooms, living room, dining area, laundry room and kitchen. There was an attached car garage observed.. Heating/Cooling System: Central heating and air conditioning system installed with a central panel located in the hallway to control the entire house. Bedrooms: Each resident bedrooms accommodate any non-ambulatory resident. All resident bedrooms were adequately furnished with bed, chair, closet, appropriate linens, adequate lighting, and an operable smoke alarm. Bathrooms: The three (3) resident/staff bathrooms have a working toilet, wash basin, and shower with an adequate supply of toilet paper and soap. At 09:45 AM, LPA tested the water temperature in the resident/staff shared bathrooms. LPA verified water temperature was measured at 108.6 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA Brown observed one resident/staff shared bathroom without non-slip mat in the bathtub/shower. Technical Assistance issued. During the visit, Administrator/Applicant Garcia purchased non-slip mat for one (1) resident/staff shared bathroom. Also, LPA Brown observed no night lights maintained in hallways and passages to non-private bathrooms. Technical Assistance issued. During the visit, Administrator/Applicant Garcia purchased the required night lights. ***CONTINUED ON LIC 809C*** ***CONTINUED FROM LIC 809*** Kitchen/Laundry: An adequate supply of dishes, glasses, utensils, pots, and pans were observed. Knives/sharp instruments were secured in a locked drawer located in the kitchen. There was adequate room for food storage. LPA observed the stove to be operational. Refrigerator/freezer were in working condition. There is more than seven (7) days’ supply of perishable foods and more than two (2) days’ supply of non-perishable foods. There was adequate seating for meals for all residents. Laundry room with washer and dryer was in the laundry room. Laundry detergents and cleaning supplies are stored in the laundry room. Living/Family room: There was a living/family room with adequate seating for all residents and a working TV. Linens and Hygiene Supplies: An adequate supply of linens was stored in a cabinet in the main hallway of the residence. Yards/Outside: Patio furniture for outdoor seating observed. Side gates on left side of the facility. All outdoor pathways were free of obstructions. Dementia Care: LPA Brown reviewed the facility’s Dementia Care Plan during the Visit. Emergency Phone Numbers, and Exit Plan: Facility sketch was observed posted. There was Ombudsman poster and Let-Us-No poster observed. LPA Brown observed Personal Rights posted in a common area. General items: One (1) fire extinguisher was charged, smoke alarms and carbon monoxide detectors were tested and were observed to be in working order. Resident records were stored in a locked cabinet in the kitchen. First Aid kit missing a tweezer. Technical Assistance issued. Administrator/Applicant Garcia purchased tweezer during the visit. Locked area for medication storage was observed. ***CONTINUED ON LIC 809C*** ***CONTINUED FROM LIC 809C** LPA observed a facility phone and was operational as evidenced by LPA dialing the number. The phone number designated for the facility is 951-246-0026. Infection Control Plan and Emergency Disaster Plan observed at the facility. Expired emergency food observed and no emergency supplies maintained at the facility. Technical Assistance issued. Administrator/Applicant purchased emergency food and stated to obtain and prepare emergency supplies during the visit. Component III was completed on this day as well. However, LPA Brown observed Staff #2 (S2) working at the facility but per documents review, S2 was not associated to the facility. Applicant/Administrator Garcia reported to LPA Brown that S2 started working at the facility on 09/2024. Also, LPA Brown observed Staff #1 (S1) criminal background clearance was not transferred to the facility prior to employment on 08/20204. Moreover, LPA Brown observed Staff #3 (S3) working at the facility and per documents review, S3 does not have criminal record clearance prior to employment on 07/2024. Technical Assistance issued. Additionally, LPA observed facility to have required single entry point with Sign In/Sign Out for Residents and Visitors upon entering the facility. LPA observed planned activities for the residents such as books and games. Menu for the residents was also noted. The facility was evaluated in accordance with the CCR, Title 22, Division 6, Chapters 1 and 6 to ensure the health and safety of residents in care. Pre-Licensing is incomplete and the following issues to be resolved by December 27 at 10:00 AM: Obtain criminal record clearance for Staff #3 (S3) Transfer/Associate Staff #1 (S1) and Staff #2 (S2) criminal record clearance to the facility. Conduct Medication Training on all staff. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report, LIC809, LIC9102 were reviewed and provided to Administrator/Applicant Ricardo Garcia and Administrator Johnny Mazariegos.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 4, 2024

The state marks this report as 8 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 3. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Riverside County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Riverside County