Small home · Licensed for 6 · Van Nuys
Angels Hands Senior Living
14819 Valerio Street, Van Nuys, CA 91405Licensed since 2024
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 5 residents
- Dementia
- Hospiceup to 6 residents
- Bedriddenup to 1 resident
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE 60 AND OVER. WAIVER/GRANTED FOR HOSPICE CARE FOR 6. APPROVED FOR SIX (6) RESIDENTS, FIVE (5) OF WHICH MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY, ONE (1) OF WHICH MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. BEDRIDDEN CLEARED IN BEDROOM #2.
983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation on file
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Angels Hands Senior Living: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight and help with medicines. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
Covelight estimate
$4,450a month to start
Likely $3,650–$5,500
From 12 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$4,450likely a month
Starting monthly rate$4,450likely $3,650–$5,500
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,650–$5,700
- $4,450
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,300–$8,900
- $6,950
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes12 nearby homes publish starting rates of $3,000 to $7,500
12 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,000–$6,500.
- Mom and Dads RetreatVan Nuys · 0.5 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Grant Serenity Homes of SF ValleyVan Nuys · 0.9 mi · Small home$7,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Breath of SunshineNorth Hills · 1.5 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- California State Health GroupNorth Hills · 2.6 mi · Small home$3,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Healthy Life Service FacilityNorth Hills · 2.8 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Breath of Sunshine HarmonyArleta · 3.1 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- A Paradise in the ValleyNorthridge · 3.4 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Breath of Sunshine PlusNorthridge · 3.6 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Alaga HomesNorthridge · 3.7 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Blue Horizon EldercareNorth Hollywood · 3.9 mi · Small home$3,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
- Blue HorizonNorth Hollywood · 3.9 mi · Small home$3,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
- Alalik Care HomeGranada Hills · 5.0 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.
The best way to see it is a visit.
Request a tourWhere it is
14819 Valerio Street, Van Nuys, CA 91405Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- Valley Presbyterian HospitalHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list0.8 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #195850430 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 8 of 8 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 2 “Unsubstantiated”.
20261 state visit · 1 document
May 13, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
At 09:55 a.m. Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Esther Cortez arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit. The LPA was greeted by staff and informed them of the reason for the visit. Administrator Marine Ghukasyan was contacted telephonically and the reason for the visit was explained. The Administrator arrived shortly thereafter. At 10:20 a.m. the LPA conducted a tour of the physical plant with the Administrator to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. The following was noted: The home is a single story family home consisting of a living room, dining room, family room, kitchen, 3 resident bedrooms, one office/staff room, 2 full bathrooms and a attached garage. The LPA observed fire extinguishers at the home, which were fully charged and last serviced 09/19/2024. All smoke alarms and carbon monoxide detectors were tested, and functioned properly. The LPA observed all required postings in the living room of the home. Kitchen: The kitchen appeared clean and the appliances and fixtures functional during the time of visit. LPA observed a sufficient amount of perishable and non-perishable food at the facility; Sharp objects are stored in a locked drawer on the left side of the stove and cleaning supplies are stored in a in a locked cabinet under the sink. At 10:23 a.m. the LPA observed two food cabinets with locks, during the visit the locks were unlocked, however when questioned staff stated that they are locked at night due to a resident removing the food at night. Locks were removed during the visit. Report will continue on LIC809-C, 2nd page. Bedrooms: All resident bedrooms were properly furnished with at least one chair, nightstand and sufficient lighting for each resident. At 10:32 a.m. the LPA observed a door lock latch in room #2 on the door leading outside near the top. The LPA could not unlock it without the assistance of staff. Door lock was removed during the visit. Bathrooms: The LPA observed all bathrooms, properly supplied and had functional fixtures. The LPA observed grab bars and non-skid mats in all bathrooms. At 10:47 a.m. water temperature in resident’s restroom was measured at 112.5 degrees Fahrenheit. Common Areas: These included the living room, family room and dining area. The common areas were checked for cleanliness and furniture was checked for functionality during time of visit. There is a fireplace in between the living room and family room, which is covered with a screen. There were no obstructions and/or tripping hazards throughout the inside of the facility. At 11:30 a.m. the LPA observed a door lock latch on the front door. Lock was removed during the visit. The garage: The LPA observed the garage where additional supplies and the emergency water is stored. Cleaning supplies and disinfectants are kept in the garage. The garage is locked. Surrounding Grounds (Outdoors): The LPA observed appropriate outdoor furniture, with a covered shaded area for residents. There are no bodies of water on the premises. At 10:59 a.m. the LPA observed the outdoor wooden walkway outside of room #2 with multiple boards uneven with visible gaps between them, some boards appear loose, and a few sections look sunken. Record Review: At 12:07 p.m. a review of facility files was initiated. The LPA reviewed five (5) out of five (5) resident files. The LPA observed documentation of Infection Control, Disaster prevention and last Disaster drill (conducted on 03/14/2026). The LPA advised to conduct disaster drills for every shift. The LPA obtained Client Roster, Staff Roster, and Insurance Liability. The LPA reviewed five (5) out of five resident files and four (4) out of four staff files. All documents reviewed appeared complete and current. Interviews: The LPA conducted three (3) resident Interviews. No immediate concerns were voiced. Report will continue in LIC809-C, 3rd page. Medications: At 3:00 p.m. a medications review was initiated for two out of five residents and the following was observed. The medications were stored in a locked cabinet in the kitchen and inaccessible to the residents. During Resident #1 (R#1's) audit, the following was observed: Loratadine 10 mg not documented on the Facility Centrally Stored Medication and Destruction Record (CSMDR), Insulin's instructions documented wrong, 2 units documented when its 16units, Lantus instructions documented wrong -16 units documented when its 15, and Pravastin's strength and quantity was not documented. During Resident #2 (R#2's) audit, the following was observed: Novolog was documented as Humolog according to the Administrator and documented as started but has not started medication and is still currently using Humolog. New order of Lantus was documented as started but not started and resident is still on the old order. Lorazepam medication filled in March is present but not being given or documented on the CSMDR, according to the Administrator it was discontinued but does not have a discontinued order and has not destroyed/discard the medication. At 3:58 p.m. the LPA observed Insulin pen with a needle, and observed staff dispense of the insulin pen needle in the kitchen trash can. Pursuant to Title 22 of the CA Code of Regulations, the following deficiencies were cited (refer to LIC 809-D): Exit interview conducted and copy of the report and appeal rights provided to Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 13, 2026
The state marks this report as 12 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 9. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
20254 state visits · 5 documents
Jun 11, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: . Staff not allowing resident to leave facility for outings. 2. Facility does not have a phone accessible to residents. 3. Staff unable to meet residents needs due to language barrier. 4. Resident does not have a signed admission agreement
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christine Yee conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit to investigate the above allegations and was let into the home by Armine Safaryan, Staff. Gevorg Gevshenyan, Staff/Spouse of the Administrator, Marine Ghukasyan was contacted and they both arrived at the facility to conduct the visit. The reason for today's visit was provided. On today's visit, LPA Yee conducted a joint interview with Marine Ghukasyan,Administrator and Gevorg Gevshenyan, Staff/Spouse at 12:27pm, Resident #1 at 11:09am, Witness #1 at 11:57am and Resident #2 - Resident #5 begining at 4:14pm. Resident #1's file was reviewed at 12:20pm and copies were obtained. Per interviews conducted regarding allegation #1 - Staff not allowing resident to leave facility for outings,the information obtained reveal that Friend #1, who had just found the whereabouts of Resident #1 Unsubstantiated Page 2. came to visit. During the visit, Friend #2 also arrived to visit. According to the information provided, Friend #2 greeted Friend #1. Friend #1 responded to the greeting with "in heat like a dog" meanly referring to some incident that had happened years ago and walked outside. Friend #2 followed and wanted to have a conversation with Friend #1 but was not successful. Resident #1, Friend #1 and Friend #2 meet for dances and have known each other for a long while. Per information provided, Friend #1 has a history of drinking in excess, beginning in the morning and doing weed. On the day Friend #1 was visiting at the facility, they were observed to be inebriated and under the influence of something and was overreacting like they do when they have been drinking. Friend #1 went back into the facility to say good-bye to Resident #1 and get the resident's cell phone to take it to get it fixed and left. The phone had been disconnected due to non-payment. Friend #1 would return once the phone was fixed. When Friend #1 returned a few hours later, the phone had not been fixed. Friend #1 asked Gevorg, Staff/Spouse if they could take Resident #1 to get the phone fixed and he responded "no", due to Friend #1's earlier observed condition, reaction and why the phone had not been fixed. Friend #1 then asked Gevorg/Staff if Resident #1 could be taken for a walk and he said okay. Friend #1 and Resident #1 went for a 20-30 minute walk in the neighborhood. Per Gevorg/Staff, he did not want Resident #1 to get into any vehicle driven by Friend #1. After the walk, Friend #1 asked again if they could take Resident #1 to get the phone fixed the following day. Again the response was "no" due to concerns with Friend #1 being inebriated the following day. Per interviews conducted with Resident #1, Witness #1 and Staff, Friend #1 was definitely inebriated and under some kind of influence during the visit. Based on the information obtained, the facility staff does not disallow residents from leaving the facility, they just did not want Resident #1 to be driven around by an inebriated person or anyone under the influence, therefore there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation that Staff is not allowing resident to leave facility for outings and is unsubstantiated at this time. Per interviews conducted with Resident #1 and other residents regarding allegation #2, Facility does not have a phone accessible to residents, During the interview, Resident #1 immediately responded that the facility has a phone and it is located in the kitchen. Per interviews conducted, the residents have to ask staff for the telephone and it will be given to them. Two residents have a working cell phone and was not sure of the location of the phone since they do not use it. Resident #1 has a cell phone that is not connected due to non-payment and has been using the facility phone to make and receive call. Based on the information Page 3 received, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation that the facility does not have a phone accessible to the residents, therefore the allegation is deemed to be unsubstantiated at this time. Per interviews conducted with the residents and LPA's conversation with Staff #1 regarding allegation that staff is unable to meet residents needs due to language barrier, reveal that Staff #1 speaks sufficient English to communicate with the residents and provide the basic services. Staff #1 however has a little more difficulty when it comes to more complicated words and uses a Google translator to assist in the communication. Per interviews with the Administrator and Gevorg, they are present at the facility all the time and are available if there are any emergencies or staff can call them on the phone. Residents all indicate that they are able to communicate with the staff sufficiently in English to get want they want. Based on the information received, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation that staff is unable to meet the residents needs due to language barrier, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated at this time. Regarding allegation #4 - Resident does not have a signed Admission Agreement, LPA Yee reviewed Resident #1's file and a copy of the Admission Agreement signed on 2/12/25 was observed in their file. Per information obtained during the visit, Resident says things and does things and does not remember. Per review of Resident #1's Physician's Report, the resident may have mild cognitive impairment or onset of dementia. Both boxes were checked off on the Physician's Report and the diagnosis is unclear. The facility was asked to contact the resident's physician to seek clarification and maintain in the resident's file. Based on the information obtained, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation that Resident does not have a signed Admission Agreement, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview was conducted and a copy was providedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 11, 2025 · control 29-AS-20250609095732
May 28, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christine Yee conducted an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of delivering the report generated for the required Annual Inspection conducted on 5/16/25. Due to computer issues and the CARE Inspection Tool, LPA Yee was not able to leave a report or issue citations. LPA Yee was let into the home by Armine Safaryan, Staff. Marine Ghukasyan, Administrator, was contacted by staff via telephone and she arrived at the facility in a few minutes to conduct the visit. The report generated on 5/16/25 was signed by the Administrator on today's visit. Exit interview was conducted and a copy of the LIC809 report generated on 5/16/25 was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 28, 2025
May 16, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christine Yee conducted an unannounced required Annual Inspection visit and used the CARE Inspection Tool. LPA Yee met with Marine Ghukasyan, Administrator. The reason for today's visit was provided. The home is a single storey family home consisting of a living room, dining room, family room, kitchen, 4 bedrooms of which one will be used for live-in staff and as an office, 2 full bathrooms and a attached garage. The facility is fire cleared for 5 NON-AMBULATORY and 1 BEDRIDDEN residents. Bedroom #2 is the room designated for bedridden use. On today's visit, LPA Yee reviewed 3 resident files and 4 staff files, reviewed medications and Medication Administration Record for Resident #3 and attempted to complete the infection control domain but was able to answer 32 questions only. The following were observed on today's visit: All three residents are receiving PRN medications but there are no completed PRN Authorization Letters on file to determine if the residents are able or unable to request their medications if needed or if staff should be contacting the physician for instructions prior to administrating the medications based on the residents' symptoms. During this visit, LPA Yee observed the Administrator dispense a pain pill to Resident #3 and it was refused by the resident. No contact was made with the physician. MAR logs are not being documented correctly. The daily MAR log is checked off when medications are dispensed and the staff dispensing the medication is unknown. The facility also keeps a separate MAR log for PRNs and cycle medications are included with a different time and looks like duplication of medications. Medication training was provided by the Administrator but documentation was unavailable. On 3/20/25 medication training was provided to 2 caregivers - Gevorg Gevshenyan and Armine Safaryan but medications dispensed are not being correctly documented as of today's visit. Resident #2 does not have a physical with evidence of a TB test Resident #3 does not have a completed Admissions Agreement on file. The facility does not have documentation of any of the emergency fire drills that have been conducted in 2024 and has only conducted one fire drill on 1/16/25. LPA Yee terminated the visit as the Administrator was not able to provide answers to the questions on the CARE Inspection Tool. Any deficiencies not addressed on today's visit will be addressed on a return visit. Deficiencies cited under California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8. Exit interview was conducted, Appeals Rights discussed and a copy was given.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 16, 2025
Feb 25, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff are keeping resident at the facility against their will.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christine Yee conducted an unannounced complaint visit to investigate the above allegation and was let into the home by Armine Safaryan, Staff. Staff contacted Marine Ghukasyan, Administrator, via telephone and she arrived at 1:59pm. The reason for today's visit was provided. LPA Yee conducted an interview with the Administrator at 2:05PM, Witness #1 at 2:36pm, Resident #1 at 3:01pm, Reporting Party at 3:32pm and Witness #2 at 4:22pm. LPA Yee also reviewed Resident #1's file and obtained copies throughout the visit. Per information received from interviews conducted, Resident #1 was residing at an unlicensed home located on Cedros Avenue and was taken to the hospital for treatment of an infection and hip pain. Prior to Resident #1 being discharged, the Department had already informed Witness #2 that Resident #1 could not be returned to the unlicensed home. Witness #2 had to locate licensed facilities in the vicinity of the Unsubstantiated hospital for new placement for Resident #1. This licensed facility was located and Resident #1 was transported to the home after a discussion was had between Witness #2 and the Administrator. After a couple of days, the Reporting Party contacted the hospital and the facility to advise them that they had stolen the resident from another licensed home. Per information provided by Witness #2, transportation records clearly show that Resident #1 was transported to the hospital from the unlicensed Cedros Avenue location and not from the licensed home that the Reporting Party claimed that Resident #1 was living at prior to hospitalization. Since the placement at this home, Reporting Party has indicated that Resident #1 does not have the mental capacity to decide where they want to live. Reporting Party alleges that Resident #1 is disoriented and confused. Per the Reporting Party, the Licensee informed them that if they want Resident #1, they should come get the resident and pay the licensee. Per interview conducted with Resident #1, the resident was observed to be well oriented, coherent and was having a normal conversation with Witness #1 during their visit in the resident's room. Per Resident #1, they do not want to move from this home. Per Resident #1, if they didn't like it at the home, they would grab their jacket and walk out. They love the food, especially the soup and they get fresh fruits even though Resident #1 eats very little. Witness #1 confirms that Resident #1 loves the home and has not seen the resident so happy in a long time. Per review of Resident #1's Physician's Report obtained from the hospital on 2/12/25, there is no indication that Resident #1 lacks the mental capacity to make decisions. It is noted that Resident #1 is occasionally forgetful. Based on today's investigation, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation that Staff are keeping resident at the facility against their will, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 25, 2025 · control 29-AS-20250222205150
Feb 25, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency page: Type A
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
Licensing Program Analyst(LPA) Christine Yee conducted an unannounced case management visit due to a deficiency noted during a visit to the facility today. The reason for the visit was explained. Per review of facility files, criminal record clearance documents were observed in the below staffs' files. However, neither staff noted below are associated to the facility. Gervog Gevshenyan, Staff is not associated to the facility Armine Safaryan, Staff is not associated to the facility Deficiencies cited under California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8. CIVIL PENALTIES were assessed. Exit interview was conducted, APPEALS RIGHTS were discussed and a copy was giventhe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 25, 2025
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87355(e)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 26, 2025
Criminal Record Clearance: All individuals subject to a criminal record review pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 1569.17(b) shall prior to working, residing or volunteering in a licensed facility: Request a transfer of a criminal record clearance as specified in Section 87355(c) or This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Staff Armine Safaryan and Gervog Gevshenyan are not associated to the home. $1000 CIVIL PENALTIES WERE ASSESSED.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 25, 2025
Plan of correction: Licensee will ensure that all staff, volunteers or individuals who require to be associated to the facility are associated prior to being present at the facility. LIcensee will associate the 2 staff to the facility via Guardian or submit a completed LIC9182 with a legible copy of their driver license to the Regional office by 2/26/25.
20242 state visits · 2 documents
Apr 4, 2024Facility evaluation reportPOCReport on file
Type of visit: POC
Licensing Program Analyst(LPA), Christine Yee, conducted a subsequent announced case management visit to verify that the deficiencies observed during the initial Prelicensing and Component III visit conducted on 3/21/24 was corrected. LPA Yee met with Marine Ghukasyan, Applicant. Also present during the visit was Gevorg George Gevshenyan, family member. Per today's visit, the following corrections were observed: the water temperature was tested in the common bathroom and it read 119.6 degrees Fahrenheit the water temperature was tested in the private bathroom and it read 119.5 degrees Fahrenheit. a blanket and a flat sheet was observed on each resident bed and 2 extra blankets were observed stored in the residents closet in each room a grab bar was observed in the shower stall located in the private bathroom the Long Term Care Ombudsman poster was obtained and was observed posted by the front door the complaint poster that met Title 22 size requirements of 20" X 26" was observed posted on the living room wall by the front door.* the water stain on the living room ceiling was painted. the double sided fire place between the living room and family room was observed with a fire screen on each side. the sliding screen door of the family room was observed to be repaired. a window screen was observed on the window located in bedroom #1. The following must be completed once the facility is licensed: liability insurance that meets Title 22 requirements will be purchased. perishable foods for a minimum of 2 days will be purchased prior to the acceptance of the first resident. Exit interview was conducted.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 4, 2024
Mar 21, 2024Facility evaluation reportPrelicensingReport on file
Type of visit: Prelicensing
Licensing Program Analyst(LPA) Christine Yee conducted an announced Prelicensing and Component III visit to inspect the physical plant to ensure that the home met Title 22 requirements. The complete CARE Inspection Tool was utilized. LPA Yee met with Marine Ghukasyan, Applicant. Also present during the inspection was Gevorg George Gevshenyan, family member. The home is a single storey family home consisting of a living room, dining room, family room, kitchen, 4 bedrooms of which one will be used for live-in staff and as an office, 2 full bathrooms and a attached garage. The facility is fire cleared for 5 NON-AMBULATORY and 1 BEDRIDDEN residents. Bedroom #2 is the room designated for bedridden use. The following was observed on today's visit: The living room was observed with a piano, a bench and a coffee table. Fire place was capped off but does not have a fire screen. The dining room was observed with a large table and 8 chairs. The family room was furnished with a leather sofa, love seat, arm chair, foot stool, a little armchair, coffee table and television. The fireplace did not have a fire screen. The sliding glass door was equipped with an operable auditory device. The top of screen door was observed to be separated from the frame and needs to be fixed The kitchen is equipped with a stove, dishwasher, coffee machine and microwave. There was sufficient non-perishable foods observed for a minimum of 7 days. No perishable foods were purchased on today's visit. The Applicant was advised that perishable foods for a minimum of 2 days must be purchased prior to the acceptance of the first resident. The following was observed: 20 dinner plates, 12 bowls, 8 cups, 6 tall glasses, 6 short glass, 7 salad plates, 8 saucers, 3 serving bowls, 12 forks, 12 knives, 12 tablespoons and 12 teaspoons were observed. Also observed were sufficient pots and pans. The staff room/office located behind the kitchen was equipped with a full size bed, dresser, desk, little refrigerator for the storage of medications. The first aid cabinet and first aid manual was stored in the room. The auditory device on the outside exit door was tested and was operational. Bedroom #1, located to the left of the facility was furnished with 2 beds, 2 night stands, 2 lamps, 2 chairs, one shared dresser and a closet. The following was observed on the 2 beds were, a mattress cover, a fitted sheet and a comforter. No blankets or flat sheets or window screens were observed. Window has blinds The common bathroom contained a walk in shower, toilet and a sink. A grab bar and non-skid mat was observed. Water temperature was tested and it initially read 122.50 and re-tested at 2:56pm and it read 127.3 degrees Fahrenheit. Bedroom #2, designated as the bedridden room for 1 was furnished with 2 beds, 2 chairs, 2 night stands, 1 shared dresser, 2 lamps and a closet. Beds had a mattress cover, fitted sheet and a comforter. No blanket or flat sheet was observed. The auditory device on the outside exiting door was tested and was operational. Located outside the door was a ramp. Bedroom #3 was furnished with 2 beds, 2 night stands, 2 lamps, 1 shared dresser, 2 chairs and a closet. The beds were observed with a mattress cover, fitted sheet and a comforter. 1 blanket was observed in the closet. Located inside the room is a private bathroom equipped with a tub, a shower stall, a toilet and a vanity with a sink. Grab bars and non-skid mat was observed in the tub and by the toilet. The shower was missing a grab bar. The water temperature was tested and initially read 125 degrees Fahrenheit at 1:49pm and was re-tested at 3:01pm and it read 125.2 degrees Fahrenheit. The following linens were observed in the cupboard located by the front door: 12 bath towels, 16 face towels and hand towels, 18 flat sheets, 18 fitted sheets and 18 pillow cases. No additional blankets were observed. All the windows have blinds for privacy The facility has 2 fire extinguishers purchase on 2/3/24. One is located in the kitchen and the other by the front door. The two carbon monoxide detectors are located in the hallway of the resident bedrooms. One of the carbon monoxide detector is hard wired with the smoke detectors. The smoke detectors were tested and were operational. The facility also has a pull alarm system located by the front door with alarms located by the common bathroom and inside bedroom #3. Per tour of the enclosed backyard, an umbrella with 6 chairs were observed for resident use. Backyard and front yared was observed to be clean. The 2 trash cans stored in the front yard y were observed to be tightly sealed and the other three were on the street due to trash pick up. The following corrections need to be made prior to licensure: The thermostat on the water heater needs to be adjusted so that the water temperature is within 105 -120 degrees Fahrenheit blankets need to be purchased and made available for resident use. a grab bar needs to be installed in the shower stall located in the private bathroom a Long Term Care Ombudsman poster needs to obtained and posted the complaint poster that meets Title 22 size requirements of 20" x 26" the water stain on the living room ceiling needs to be painted. the fire place needs to made inaccessible to the residents. A fire screen will meet this requirement. the sliding screen door of the family room needs to be repaired. a window screen needs to be placed on the window located in bedroom #1 The following must be completed once the facility is licensed: liability insurance that meets Title 22 requirements will be purchased perishable foods for a minimum of 2 days will be purchased prior to the acceptance of the first resident. Once all the corrections have been completed, the Applicant will notify LPA Yee so that a return visit may be conducted to clear the facility. COMPONENT III was conducted Marine Ghukasyan and Gevorg Gevshenyan. Exit interview was conducted.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 21, 2024
5 of 6 beds were occupied at the June 11, 2025 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Angels Hands Senior Living, Inc., licensed since 2024.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2024, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 8
- Total complaints
- 2
- Substantiated allegations
- 0
- Type A citations
- 0
- Type B citations
- 0
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2024, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 0 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 0 | 0 |
| Substantiated allegations | 0 | 0 |
| Total complaints | 2 | 0 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Angels Hands Senior Living
Is Angels Hands Senior Living licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Angels Hands Senior Living licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Angels Hands Senior Living been cited?
0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2024, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 8 state visits over the same years.
Is Angels Hands Senior Living still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 10, 2026.
What does Angels Hands Senior Living cost?
$4,450 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,650–$5,500. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 232 other homes of a similar licensed size across Los Angeles County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $6,151 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 232 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Angels Hands Senior Living take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Angels Hands Senior Living, Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Valley Presbyterian Hospital is 0.8 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Angels Hands Senior Living keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Angels Hands Senior Living license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “ANGELS HANDS SENIOR LIVING”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #195850430. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to Angels Hands Senior Living, Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2024, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 8 state inspection visits since 2024, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2024, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 8 state visits in that period.
- 2 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2024, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is May 13, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in Los Angeles County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Starting rate
$3,400 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,250 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,500–$5,250On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,250 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,500–$5,250On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,550 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,700–$5,600On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,300 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,550–$5,300On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,950 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,050–$6,100On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore Los Angeles County