Large community · Licensed for 131 · Antioch
Trevista Antioch
3950 Lone Tree Way, Antioch, CA 94509Licensed since 2018
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Licensed for 131: a large care communityThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 100 residents
- Dementia
- Hospiceup to 15 residents
- Bedriddenup to 10 residents
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 31 AMBULATORY AND 100 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 10 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 15 RESIDENTS.
983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 15 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation on file
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Trevista Antioch: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight and help with medicines. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
Covelight estimate
$5,050a month to start
Likely $3,950–$6,450
From 15 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Monthly cost breakdownWith a studio and basic help · room, care and fees$5,050likely a month
Starting monthly rate$5,050likely $3,950–$6,450
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 15 communities with 50 or more beds within 15 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,950–$6,600
- $5,050
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,800–$9,700
- $7,550
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes15 nearby homes publish starting rates of $3,495 to $7,000
15 homes like this within 15 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,450–$6,500.
- The Commons at Dallas RanchAntioch · 1.2 mi · Large community$4,355Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Cogir of BrentwoodBrentwood · 5.5 mi · Large community$4,476Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Merrill Gardens at BrentwoodBrentwood · 5.9 mi · Large community$3,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Brentwood Grove Senior LivingBrentwood · 6.0 mi · Large community$3,495Listed on its own website · now offering apartments · seen October 5, 2026
- Montecito Oakmont Senior LivingConcord · 9.5 mi · Large community$6,295Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Concord RoyaleConcord · 10 mi · Large community$3,600Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
- Ivy Park at Walnut CreekWalnut Creek · 13 mi · Large community$5,495Listed on its own website · studio apartments · seen October 27, 2026
- Oakmont of ConcordConcord · 13 mi · Large community$6,795Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- The Reutlinger CommunityDanville · 14 mi · Large community$6,700Listed on its own website · assisted living starting rate · seen October 5, 2026
- Sunrise Assisted Living of DanvilleDanville · 14 mi · Large community$5,900Listed on its own website · studio · seen October 27, 2026
- Brookdale Diablo LodgeDanville · 14 mi · Large community$6,485Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Chateau IIIPleasant Hill · 14 mi · Large community$5,295Listed on its own website · apartments at carlton pleasant hill – downtown currently · seen October 27, 2026
- Aegis Living Pleasant HillPleasant Hill · 14 mi · Large community$6,384Listed on its own website · private apartments · seen October 27, 2026
- The Kensington at Walnut CreekWalnut Creek · 15 mi · Large community$7,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Tiffany CourtWalnut Creek · 15 mi · Large community$4,350Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 15 communities with 50 or more beds within 15 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Daily life here is not on file yet, and that says nothing about the home.
The best way to see it is a visit.
Request a tourWhere it is
3950 Lone Tree Way, Antioch, CA 94509Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- Sutter Delta Medical CenterHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list0.4 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #79200748 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 12 of 21 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 1 “Substantiated” and 3 “Unsubstantiated”.
20262 state visits · 3 documents
Jan 21, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff do not accord resident privacy
On 01/21/26 3:58PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) D Panlilio conducted a subsequent complaint visit, met with Manager on Duty (MOD) and delivered investigation finding. LPA explained the purpose of the visit with MOD. On 01/14/26, LPA obtained the following documents from manager on duty (MOD): Personnel record (LIC500), Residents roster, Fall detection system (Sage Motion Detectors) notification to residents and responsible parties dated 12/12/25. Continued on next page, LIC9099-C Unsubstantiated Allegation: Staff do not accord resident privacy Investigation Finding: Unsubstantiated During investigation LPA interviewed reporting party (RP), staff (Manager on Duty (MOD, Regional Director (RD) and reviewed the Sage Fall Detection System notification letter sent to residents on 12/12/25. RP stated that the facility has installed AI fall cameras in all resident bedrooms including memory care (sign notification on the door walking into memory care) which are capable of fall detection and motion/video recording. On 01/14/26 at 3:30PM, LPA toured the facility and observed the motion detector devices installed inside assisted living and memory care residents’ bedrooms. RD stated that the Sage Motion Detectors are not surveillance cameras. They are motion detectors which do not record any audio or continuous live monitoring. RD stated that the facility will hold informational meetings about the Sage motion detection system for additional education, understanding of the system and consent forms will be provided to all residents, authorized representatives, family members who would like to avail of the fall detention system service. MOD stated residents who decide not ot avail of the Sage fall detection system will have the device covered and inactive from the system. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did occur, therefore the allegation that staff do not accord resident privacy is unsubstantiated. No deficiency cited during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 21, 2026 · control 15-AS-20260108151520
Jan 21, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
On 01/21/26 at 4:40PM, while at the facility for another reason, LPA D Panlilio spoke with Manager on Duty (MOD) and Wellness Director (WD) regarding the sefl reported sexual abuse incident on 01/14/26. LPA obtained the following information from MOD and WD: On 01/15/26, resident (R1) disclosed that on 01/04/26 and 01/08/26, during shower assistance provided by caregiver (S1), R1 stated that S1 allegedly touched her genital area inappropriately. R1 reported the incident to her family member during a phone conversation at a later date, who in turn reported it to management for investigation. The facility notified local police who investigated S1 the same day and also sent SOC341 to Ombudsman. WD stated R1 has mild dementia and did not want to be evaluated. A police report# 26-385 was filed. WD conducted an internal investigation and interviewed 5 other residents (R2, R3, R4, R5,R6) under S1's care. They stated that staff (including S1) are great, kind, helpful, provide good care and that they have no concerns with staff. LPA interviewed S1 who stated that she did not inappropriately touch R1 in her genital area during the 2 weekly showers she gave her. S1 stated R1 was holding onto the bath grab bar with one hand and had pain in her other hand. S1 stated R1 requested her to clean her with a wash cloth. S1 cleaned R1's side groin area with the wash cloth and denied touching her inappropriately. No deficiency cited during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 21, 2026
Jan 14, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 01/14/26 at 4PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Daisy Panlilio conducted an unannounced required one year inspection and met with staff (Manager on duty (MOD), Wellness Director (WD)). LPA explained the purpose of the visit with MOD and WD. At 04:10PM, LPA toured the facility including but not limited to the front entrance, screening station, kitchen, bathrooms, bedrooms and common areas. There is one central entry point for universal screening for staff, residents and visitors. An electronic sign-in policy, visitor’s logs, no touch thermometer, additional face masks and hand sanitizers were observed at the front desk screening station. Emergency Disaster Plan, Complaint poster, Personal rights, Cough/sneeze etiquette, proper hand-washing signs were observed posted in common areas. Facility has a sufficient 2-day perishable and 7-day non-perishable food supply. Facility has a 30-day supply of PPEs, paper, medications locked in cabinets. Comfortable temperature is maintained at 70 deg F. Hot water temperature was measured at 117 deg F. Facility has a mitigation plan in place and the infection control leader is the administrator. Inside and outside pathways were free of obstruction and fire hazards. Smoke and Carbon monoxide detectors were operational. Fire extinguishers were observed fully charged and last inspected on 11/10/26. LPA observed stairwell lift chairs for evacuation. Inside and outside pathways were observed clear and free of fire hazards. LPA reviewed 5 staff and 10 resident files. Continued on next page, LIC 809-C Updated copies of the following documents were collected for facility file: LIC500- Personnel Report Residents Roster LIC308- Designation of Facility Responsibility LIC610E- Emergency/Disaster Plan including infection control plans Evidence of Liability Insurance No deficiencies observed during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 14, 2026
20253 state visits · 3 documents
Nov 7, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident sustained multiple pressure injuries due to lack of care from staff Staff did not ensure that resident needs were met while in care
On 11/07/25 at 3:10PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) D Panlilio conducted a subsequent visit and met with administrator (ADM) to deliver the findings of above allegations. LPA explained the purpose of the visit with ADM. During investigation, the Department obtained the following documents from administrator – Residents’ admission agreements, physician's reports, Needs/Services plans, appraisals, medication administration records, hospital visit discharge reports, Level of care notes & ADL schedules. Health & safety check conducted see LIC 809 dated 05/16/25. Continued on next page, LIC 9099-C Substantiated Allegation: Resident sustained multiple pressure injuries due to lack of care from staff Investigation Finding: Substantiated During investigation, the Department conducted interviews of residents (R1, R2, R3), facility staff (ED, S1, S2, S3, S4) & R1’s responsible party (POA): and reviewed resident (R1) documents. Review of R1’s files showed no documentation of any pre-existing pressure injuries upon admission. POA also confirmed that R1 moved into the facility on 04/27/25 without any pressure injuries. During interview, the Memory Care Director also stated that R1 was admitted with no pressure injuries. The Department observed that R1’s care plan included the skin treatment routine of keeping the skin clean and dry, apply over the counter skin care cream, and monitor for any redness, irritation, and/or open skin, however, the facility’s Task Administration Record showed no care entries for the Skin Treatment Routine were performed from April 27, 2025 through May 11, 2025. Three caregiver staff reported to the Department that they had changed R1s incontinence wear, clothing, and provided a shower, and denied noticing anything other than chafing or surface level redness. However, R1 was picked up by POA on 05/11/25 to return home after living at the facility for about 15 days and on the same day, the POA discovered a pressure injury and took R1 to the hospital where she was diagnosed with stage 3 infected pressure injuries. Based on the Department’s observations and interviews which were conducted and record review(s), the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) that resident sustained multiple pressure injuries due to lack of care from staff was found to be substantiated. Immediate civil penalty of $500 assessed during visit for staff failing to provide adequate care and supervision to resident resulting in hospitalization and sustaining multiple pressure injuries while in care. Additional civil penalty determination is pending relating to resident’s serious bodily injury. Continued on next page, LIC 9099-C pg2 Allegation: Staff did not ensure resident’s needs were met while in care Investigation Finding: Substantiated During investigation, the Department conducted interviews of facility staff (ED, S1 S2, S3, S4), responsible party (POA) and reviewed resident (R1) documents. Review of R1’s admission agreement showed R1 was first admitted to at the facility on 04/27/25 for respite care and resided at the facility for 15 days until 05/11/25. R1 was assessed as having cognitive impairment, was ambulatory with a cane/wheelchair, neededs standby assistance transferring in & out of bed, total assistance with ADLs (showering, incontinence care, toileting, grooming, dressing, feeding) and was a high risk for falls. POA agreed to place R1 in the memory care unit so that she R1 can have additional staff care support. Review of R1’s files showed no documentation of any pre-existing pressure injuries upon admission. During staff interviews, some staff stated they had noticed redness near the coccyx during R1’s stay, but since it appeared to be only surface level, they did not report any concerns. Staff denied observing any pressure injuries, although the Task Administration Record (TAR) for R1 showed no entries for “Skin Treatment Routine” were performed from for 04/27/25 through 05/11/25. The Skin Treatment Routine was identified as a service need. Based on the Department’s observations and interviews which were conducted and record review(s), the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) that staff did not ensure resident’s needs were me while in care was found to be substantiated. Deficiencies are cited per Title 22 California Code of Regulations and listed on LIC9099D. Failure to submit proof of corrections (POC) by plan of correction due dates and/or any repeat deficiencies within a 12-month period may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted, appeal rights and copy of report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 7, 2025 · control 15-AS-20250514175501
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: HSC 1569.269 · Plan of correction due date: Nov 7, 2025
Enumerated rights; severability (a) Residents of residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following rights: (10) To be free from neglect . . .This requirement was not met as evidenced by staff failing to provide adequate care & supervision which posed a potential health & safety risk to residents in care. This requirement was not met as evidenced by resident (R1) developing multiple pressure injuries which posed an immediate health and safety risk to resident in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 7, 2025
Plan of correction: Immediate civil penalty of $500 assessed during visit for staff failing to provide adequate care and supervision to resident resulting in hospitalization and sustaining multiple pressure injuries while in care. Additional civil penalty determination is pending relating to resident’s serious bodily injury. A non-compliance conference meeting with CCLD will be scheduled at a later time.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.2(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 5, 2025
Residents in privately operated residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: To care, supervision, and services that meet their individual needs and are delivered by staff that are sufficient in numbers, qualifications, and competency to meet their needs… This requirement was not met as evidenced by staff failing to provide adequate care & supervision which posed an immediate health & safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 7, 2025
Plan of correction: By POC due date, administrator agreed to complete and submit in-service staff retraining certifications by an approved CCL vendor on personal rights of residents in compliance with Section 87468.2 (a)(4).
Jul 1, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
On 07/01/25 at 4PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) D Panlilio conducted an unannounced case management visit and met with executive director (ED). LPA explained the purpose of the visit with ED. On 06/30/25, the facility self reported an incident that occurred on 06/28/25 at 10AM between two dementia residents (R1, R2) who started yelling and hitting each other in front of the elevator. Staff intervened and redirected them. Staff checked both residents and observed no injuries. On 06/30/25, R2 moved out of the facility as she was already scheduled to move out of the facility in July to be closer to family members. No deficiency cited during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 1, 2025
Jan 16, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 02/27/24 at 2:15PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Daisy Panlilio conducted an unannounced required one year inspection and met with Administrator (ADM). LPA explained the purpose of the visit with ADM. LPA observed facility is still under quarantine for positive cases of COVID-19. ADM stated COVID surveillance will be lifted on 01/17/25. At 2:30PM, LPA toured the facility including but not limited to the front entrance, screening station, kitchen, bathrooms, bedrooms and common areas. There is one central entry point for universal screening for staff, residents and visitors. An electronic sign-in policy, visitor’s logs, no touch thermometer, additional face masks and hand sanitizers were observed at the front desk screening station. Emergency Disaster Plan, Complaint poster, Personal rights, Cough/sneeze etiquette, proper hand-washing signs were observed posted in common areas. Facility has a sufficient 2-day perishable and 7-day non-perishable food supply. Facility has a 30-day supply of PPEs, paper, medications locked in cabinets. Comfortable temperature is maintained at 71 deg F. Hot water temperature was measured at 116 deg F. Facility has a mitigation plan in place and the infection control leader is the administrator. Inside and outside pathways were free of obstruction and fire hazards. Smoke and Carbon monoxide detectors were operational. Fire extinguishers were observed fully charged and last inspected on 01/02/25. LPA observed stairwell lift chairs for evacuation. Inside and outside pathways were observed clear and free of fire hazards. LPA reviewed 5 staff and 5 resident files. Continued on next page, LIC 809-C Updated copies of the following documents were collected for facility file: LIC500- Personnel Report Residents Roster LIC308- Designation of Facility Responsibility LIC610E- Emergency/Disaster Plan including infection control plans Evidence of Liability Insurance No deficiencies observed during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 16, 2025
20244 state visits · 5 documents
Nov 7, 2024Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
On 11/07/2024 at 02:43PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) T. Syess-Gibson conducted an unannounced Case Management visit regarding an incident that was reported to CCLD on 11/04/2024. LPA met with Alberto Maldonado, Executive Director (ED) and explained the purpose of the visit. The incident occurred on 11/04/2024 at 1:15PM which involved a resident (R1) hitting another resident (R2) with his cane across R2’s forearm. LPA interviewed ED who stated both R1 and R2 were waiting for the elevator to arrive in the lobby area, when R1 struck R2 with his cane across the forearm, stating R2 stole his jewelry from him. After staff accessed the situation, it turned out that R2 didn’t have jewelry but did have a snicker candy bar in his hand. ED stated both R1 and R2 has history from dating the same women on the past. R1 has dementia, ED in the process of reaching out to R1’s Physician regarding possibly adjusting R1’s medication. ED also stated in the process of writing a letter to R1’s responsible party(granddaughter) advising of final warning of violation of house rules/misconduct. Both R1 and R2 has agreed to stay away from each other. No deficiencies issued during the visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 7, 2024
Sep 26, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not honor restraining order for resident
On 09/26/24 at 2:50PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) D Panlilio conducted a subsequent visit and met with executive director (ED) to deliver the finding of above allegation. LPA explained the purpose of the visit with ED. On 07/23/24, LPA obtained the following documents from ED on resident (R1): Restraining Order for other resident (R2) effective December 29, 2023, Power of Attorney to witness (W1) effective February 24, 2024, R1’s Physician's report dated 09/09/23, Needs & Services Plan, R1 Emails, R1’s physicians’ statements, Elder Abuse Concerns & mandated reporting – R1 sent by family lawyer (FL) dated January 4, 2024, R2 sign out records from 12/29/23 until 02/15/24. Continued on next page, LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiated Allegation: Staff did not honor restraining order for resident Investigation Finding: Unsubstantiated During investigation, LPA reviewed resident’s admission agreement dated 09/09/23 which showed he was first admitted at the facility on the same date. Review of R1’s physician’s report dated 07/18/23 showed R1 was diagnosed with dementia and should be escorted by staff due to cognitive impairment. However, review of R1’s latest physician’s report dated 01/31/24 showed R1 was ambulatory, in good physical condition and was able to leave the facility unassisted. On 12/19/23, Executive Director (ED) notified R1’s authorized representative (POA) that R1 left the facility in the company of another resident (R2) using her personal vehicle after ED advised R2 not to do so. A missing person's report was filed with the local police department. ED stated R1 and R2 returned to the facility on the same day, 12/19/23. Due to R2’s constant involvement with R1’s communications and finances, an Elder Abuse Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) was filed by R1’s POA and was granted by the Contra Costa County Superior Court. The TRO required R2 To stay at least 2 yards (6 feet) away from R1 and not to interfere with his finances or communications in any way. Family lawyer (FL) served R2 with the TRO effective 12/29/23 and emailed a copy to facility staff on 01/03/24. ED stated he met with R2 on 12/29/23, discussed the TRO and R2 agreed to honor the TRO. ED stated R2 was observed constantly out of the facility by staff to avoid seeing R1. Review of R2’s sign out records from 12/29/23 until 02/15/24 showed R2 left the facility frequently to spend more time with family and friends. On 02/18/24, R1 had a stroke and was sent to the hospital for treatment. On 02/24/24, R1 appointed his brother (W1) and granted W1 power of attorney for his medical and financial decisions. The hospital transferred R1 to a skilled nursing facility where his health continued to decline. R1 was later transferred to another skilled nursing facility and passed away on 06/22/24. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did occur, therefore the allegation that staff did not honor restraining order for resident is unsubstantiated. No deficiencies cited during visit. Exit Interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 26, 2024 · control 15-AS-20240718155310
Jul 23, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility retained resident with restricted health condition
On 07/23/24 at 12:45PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPAs) D Panlilio conducted an unannounced subsequent visit and delivered the investigation findings to the administrator (ADM). LPA explained the purpose of the visit with ADM. Allegation: Facility retained resident with restricted health conditions Investigation Finding: Unsubstantiated Based on the department’s observations and interviews which were conducted and record review(s), resident (R1) was first admitted at the facility on 10/31/22. R1 initially developed a stage 2 coccyx wound on 08/23/23. Staff communicated with her primary care physician (PCP) who ordered a wound care treatment plan with home health (HH) visits three times per week from 08/23/23 to 04/26/24. Continued on next page, LIC9099-C Unsubstantiated Review of HH notes stated that R1 had a very slow healing wound due to her being diabetic which progressed from a stage 2 to a stage 3 shallow wound pressure injury. Staff assisted R1 in keeping the wound dry and pressure off the wound area. Staff continued to communicate with R1’s PCP on R1’s wound’s status and followed doctor’s orders for new medications. On 05/08/24, R1 was transferred to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) for continued wound care and still remains at the SNF currently. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did occur. Therefore, the allegation that facility retained resident with restricted health condition is unsubstantiated. No deficiencies cited. Exit Interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 23, 2024 · control 15-AS-20240510155002
Jul 23, 2024Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
On 07/23/24 at 1:40PM, LPA D Panlilio conducted an unannounced case management as a result of receiving an incident report (SOC341) on 07/03/24 regarding aggressive behaviors between resident (R1) and staff (S1). ADM stated that S1 reported that on 07/02/24, she was providing care to R1 who became aggressive towards her and attempted to scratch her face. S1 held R1’s right wrist in self -defense. The following day it was noted that R1’s right wrist had some bruising and swelling. R1 denied pain or discomfort. Antioch police report was filed (Ref# 24-038542). ADM stated S1 was suspended on 07/04/24 and completed in-service staff retraining on proper redirection/handling of residents with aggressive behaviors. No deficiencies cited. Exit Interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 23, 2024
Feb 27, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 02/27/24 at 12PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Daisy Panlilio conducted an unannounced required one year inspection and met with Administrator (ADM). LPA explained the purpose of the visit with ADM. At 01:30PM, LPA toured the facility including but not limited to the front entrance, screening station, kitchen, bathrooms, bedrooms and common areas. There is one central entry point for universal screening for staff, residents and visitors. An electronic sign-in policy, visitor’s logs, no touch thermometer, additional face masks and hand sanitizers were observed at the front desk screening station. Emergency Disaster Plan, Complaint poster, Personal rights, Cough/sneeze etiquette, proper hand-washing signs were observed posted in common areas. Facility has a sufficient 2-day perishable and 7-day non-perishable food supply. Facility has a 30-day supply of PPEs, paper, medications locked in cabinets. Comfortable temperature is maintained at 72 deg F. Hot water temperature was measured at 115 deg F. Facility has a mitigation plan in place and the infection control leader is the administrator. Inside and outside pathways were free of obstruction and fire hazards. Smoke and Carbon monoxide detectors were operational. Fire extinguishers were observed fully charged and last inspected on 01/07/24. LPA observed stairwell lift chairs for evacuation. Inside and outside pathways were observed clear and free of fire hazards. LPA reviewed 5 staff and 5 resident files. LPA also conducted 5 staff and 5 resident interviews during visit. Continued on next page, LIC 809-C Updated copies of the following documents were collected for facility file: LIC500- Personnel Report Residents Roster LIC308- Designation of Facility Responsibility LIC610E- Emergency/Disaster Plan including infection control plans Evidence of Liability Insurance No deficiencies observed during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 27, 2024
20231 state visit · 1 document
Dec 14, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
On 12/14/2023 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) K. Nguyen conducted an unannounced case management visit regarding a SOC 341 self reported incident that occurred on 11/25/23. LPA spoke with Alberto Maldonado, Executive Director and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA received an SOC 341 self reported regrading a resident hitting another resident while in the community. LPA interviewed S1 regrading the incident. S1 stated that the situation has been resolved. S1 spoke with the victim family members and explained the situation. R1 was place on Hospice after the incident. Prior to the incident R1 tend to have a behavior of going door to door of other residents and enter their room. R2 didn’t like what R1 was doing R2 chanting at R1 (don’t you dare go inside my room). R1 got irritated while walking pass R2, R1 brush R2 away. R2 was brushed away by R1 there were no injury to R2, and R2 was check for any other injury cause by the brushing. R1 is now on hospice and now med compliance. LPA reviewed and obtained: - Resident roster and staff roster - R1 admission to hospice new order for medication. - R1 assessment. - R1 progress notes - Day of incident police report number: E23066740 No deficiencies cited. Exit Interview conducted and a copy of this report provided via email.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 14, 2023
Earlier years2022 to 2023 · 9 documents
20232 state visits · 3 documents
Aug 11, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff left resident in soiled sheets for extended period of time Staff are not meeting resident's care needs Facility is short staffed
On 08/11/23 at 11:23 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) D Panlilio conducted a subsequent visit and met with executive director (ED) to deliver the findings of above allegations. LPA explained the purpose of the visit with ED. Allegation: Staff left resident in soiled sheets for an extended period of time Investigation Finding: Unsubstantiated During investigation, LPA reviewed resident’s (R1) records and observed R1 has resided at the facility since 08/22/2018. She was admitted into hospice care on 03/17/2022 and relocated to the memory care unit due to declining health and dementia. ED stated staff changed memory care residents’ sheets daily or as needed. Review of R1's charting notes confirm R1's sheets were changed daily. Continued on next page, LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiated Allegation: Staff left resident in soiled sheets for an extended period of time Investigation Finding: Unsubstantiated Continuation... Review of R1’s care plan show staff provided R1 full assistance with R1’s bathing/showering (2X per week) and daily assistance with dressing/undressing, toileting and wandering. Review of R1’s care plan also showed daily routine checks done by staff every 2 hours as instructed by hospice care team. Based on interviews and record reviews which were conducted, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did occur, therefore the allegation that staff left resident in soiled sheets for an extended period of time is unsubstantiated. Allegation: Staff are not meeting resident’ s care needs Investigation Finding: Unsubstantiated During investigation, LPA reviewed R1’s care plan dated 04/20/2022 which showed nail care was provided by a certified podiatrist every month on the 31st day or as needed since R1 was a high risk for complications following nail care. ED stated R1 left the facility 05/24/22 and moved to another facility. ED stated R1’s authorized representative met with him in May 2022 because they wanted to move R1 back to the facility due to better care than the facility they moved R1 into. Based on interviews and record reviews which were conducted, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did occur, therefore the allegation that staff are not meeting resident’s care needs is unsubstantiated. Allegation: Facility is short staffed Investigation Finding: Unsubstantiated During investigation LPA observed the memory care unit has 24 dementia residents assisted by 4 staff (2 caregivers, 1 activities assistant and 1 resident care director) on each shift. Residents in care were observed well groomed, odor free and comfortable in their surroundings. Review of R1’s care plan dated 04/20/22 show staff provided R1 full assistance with activities of daily living - bathing (2X per week); toileting, dressing/undressing, grooming, incontinence care, wandering daily with routine checks done every 2 hours as well as implemented hospice care teams’ instructions while in care. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did occur, therefore the allegation that facility is short staffed is unsubstantiated. Exit Interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 11, 2023 · control 15-AS-20220404100947
Aug 11, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident’s room is unsanitary Resident’s hygiene needs are not being met
On 08/11/23 at 1PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) D Panlilio conducted a subsequent visit and met with executive director (ED) to deliver the findings of above allegations. LPA explained the purpose of the visit with ED. Allegation: Resident’s room is unsanitary Investigation Finding: Substantiated During investigation, witness (W1) stated she visited resident (R1) at the facility on several dates (11/30/21, 12/01/21, 01/22/22, 02/12/22, 05/01/22). On 06/21/22, LPA reviewed photos of R1’s room which showed fecal stains on R1’s toilet stand, bedroom wall, chair, rug, floors, sheets, light fixture, unflushed fecal matter inside the toilet and R1’s soiled pajamas and underwear. Continued on next page, LIC 9099-C Substantiated Allegation: Resident’s room is unsanitary Investigation Finding: Substantiated Continuation... W1 stated she reported these conditions to executive director (ED) who stated he would handle with staff. W1 visited R1 again on 12/01/21 with the bathroom in the same unsanitary condition, stained rugs not removed and washed. On 01/22/22, W1 visited R1 and found poop on the toilet and pajamas full of poop thrown in the shower. Based on interviews and record reviews which were conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met and the above allegation(s) that resident’s room is unsanitary was found to be substantiated. Allegation: Resident’s hygiene needs are not being met Investigation Finding: Substantiated During investigation, witness (W1) stated family visited resident (R1) at the facility on several dates (11/30/21, 12/06,21) and reported to staff that R1 had not had a shower with hair greasy. W1 stated R1 was finally showered by staff on 12/07/21. W1 stated that from 12/10/21 until 12/13/21, R1 was again not given a shower. ED stated a care conference was held with W1 and R1’s family on 12/15/21. R1’s shower schedule was discussed as well as R1’s weight loss and meal menu. W1 stated staff showered R1 on 01/06/22. Review of R1’s care plan showed R1 required full assistance with weekly showering, wash, shampoo and dressing/undressing to maintain good personal hygiene and cleanliness. On 02/12/22, W1 stated she visited R1 and found her hair greasy again, she had no underwear on and was full of poop. W1 stated the bathroom floor had dried poop and asked staff to clean the room asap. Rather than wait for staff to show up, W1 and W2 stated they gave R1 a shower, washed her hair and placed clean underwear on her and fresh clothes. Continued on next page, LIC 9099-C Allegation: Resident’s hygiene needs are not being met Investigation Finding: Substantiated Continuation... LPA reviewed photos on 06/21/22 which showed R1 with matted, greasy hair, underwear full of fecal matter, dried fecal stains on wall, chair and rug. Review of R1’s care plan showed staff will assist resident to set up toothbrush and toothpaste for oral care at least 2X per day with occasional reminders/cues with using toothbrush/toothpaste/floss or denture maintenance. LPA reviewed a photo of R1’s dental decay when R1’s family took her to the dentist for dental cleaning on 05/23/22. Based on interviews and record reviews which were conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met and the above allegation(s) that resident’s hygiene needs are not being met was found to be substantiated. Deficiencies are cited per Title 22 California Code of Regulations and listed on LIC9099D. Failure to submit proof of correction (POC) by plan of correction due date and/or any repeat deficiencies within a 12-month period may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted. Appeal rights and a copy of this report provided. Allegation: Facility staff failed to provide adequate care and supervision, resulting in resident sustaining significant weight loss Investigation Finding: Unsubstantiated Continuation... LPA reviewed R1’s care plans which showed her weight in January 2022 at 99.8 pounds and 87.2 pounds in May 2022. W1 stated R1’s weight was at 80.6 pounds. LPA observed R1’s medication records showed R1’s primary care physician prescribed R1 to drink ensure nutritional shakes twice daily with a start date of 02/10/2022. Review of R1’s care plan dated 03/28/22 show a care conference was held by staff and her medical provider to address R1’s weight loss and lab work was ordered. Staff stated R1 refused to eat lunch and dinner due to poor appetite. Review of R1’s care plan dated 06/22/22 show staff provided R1 with nutritional shakes ordered by the doctor daily at 8AM, 12PM, 5PM. Staff stated R1 also had snacks twice daily. Based on interviews and record reviews which were conducted, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did occur, therefore the allegation that staff failed to provide adequate care and supervision resulting in resident sustaining significant weight loss is unsubstantiated. Allegation: Facility is providing inadequate food service Investigation Finding: Unsubstantiated During investigation, LPA interviewed staff (ED, S1) who stated that they implemented resident’s (R1) care plan which was full assist with special diet, providing a nutritional shake ordered by the doctor daily at 8AM, 12PM, 5PM and as needed. Staff (ED, S1) stated R1 does not eat much and refuses to drink all flavors of ensure nutritional shakes because she dislikes the taste. Staff stated they provided R1 with food that she likes such as egg, fruit, dessert. R1 also had snacks twice daily. Staff stated that despite their efforts, R1 continued to lose weight due to poor appetite. Staff (S1) stated they are cutting R1’s food at each meal and assisting her with setting up her food while in care. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did occur, therefore the allegation that facility is providing inadequate food service is unsubstantiated. Continuation on next page, LIC 9099-C Allegation: Resident’s laundry needs are not being met Investigation Finding: Unsubstantiated During investigation, LPA reviewed housekeeping schedules which showed weekly laundry was provided by staff to all 24 memory care residents to keep all clothing and linens clean. Staff (ED) stated each residents’ clothing, beddings, linens and towels were kept in dedicated laundry baskets that were laundered and delivered back by staff weekly. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did occur, therefore the allegation that resident’s laundry needs are not being met is unsubstantiated. Allegation: Facility restroom is in disrepair Investigation Finding: Unsubstantiated During investigation, staff (ED) stated that on 05/01/22, the common hallway restroom toilet was reported clogged. LPA confirmed with staff (S2) that the common hallway restroom toilet was unclogged the same day. On 06/22/22, LPA observed common hallway restroom toilet was not clogged, flushing properly and in good repair. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did occur, therefore the allegation that facility restroom is in disrepair is unsubstantiated. Exit Interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 11, 2023 · control 15-AS-20220621120143
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87303(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 8, 2023
The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance shall include provision of maintenance services and procedures for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors. (1) Floor surfaces in bath, laundry and kitchen areas shall be maintained in a clean, sanitary, and odorless condition. This requirement was not met as evidenced by resident’s unsanitary room which posed a potential health & safety risk to resident in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 11, 2023
Plan of correction: By POC due date, ED agreed to complete and submit to CCL in-service staff retraining certifications on the timely cleaning, sanitation and handling of residents’ dirty personal belongings in compliance with Title 22 Section 87303 regulations.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87465(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 8, 2023
A plan for incidental medical and dental care shall be developed by each facility. The plan shall encourage routine medical and dental care and provide for assistance in obtaining such care, by compliance with the following: (1) The licensee shall arrange, or assist in arranging, for medical and dental care appropriate to the conditions and needs of residents. This requirement was not met as evidenced by resident’s hygiene needs not being met which posed a potential health & safety risk to resident in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 11, 2023
Plan of correction: By POC due date, ED agreed to complete and submit to CCL in-service staff retraining certifications on providing residents with routine assistance in medical and dental care in compliance with Title 22 Section 87465 regulations.
Feb 23, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 02/23/23 at 3:15PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) D Panlilio arrived unannounced to conduct infection control inspection. LPA met with administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA observed 5 staff wearing face masks assisting residents in the activities room and visitation areas. LPA toured the facility including but not limited to the front entrance, screening station, hand washing stations, kitchen, bathrooms, bedrooms and common areas. There is one central entry point for universal screening for staff, residents and visitors. A sign-in policy, visitor’s logs, no touch thermometer, additional face masks and hand sanitizer were observed at the screening station. Cough/sneeze etiquette, social distancing signs were posted in common areas. Facility has a sufficient 2-day perishable and 7-day non-perishable food supply. Facility has a 30-day supply of PPEs maintained at a central location and easily accessible for staff. Comfortable temperature is maintained at 74 deg F. Facility has a mitigation plan in place and maintains records of routine screening for residents and staff. The infection control leader is the administrator. Updated copies of the following documents were requested for facility file and are to be submitted to CCL on or before 02/24/23: · LIC500- Personnel Report · LIC308- Designation of Facility Responsibility · LIC610E- Emergency/Disaster Plan including infection control plans · Evidence of Liability Insurance No deficiencies cited during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 23, 2023
20223 state visits · 6 documents
Sep 13, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff are not able to adequately communicate with residents Staff are not cleaning up after residents are done eating
On 09/13/22 at 12:30PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Daisy Panlilio conducted an unannounced complaint visit, met with executive director (ED), gathered information and delivered investigation findings to ED. LPA explained the purpose of the visit with ED. During visit, LPA toured the memory care unit with ED and introduced LPA to 3 staff (S1, S2, S3) working the AM shift. ED stated that all staff are required to speak and write in english prior to employment. ED stated that most staff are bilingual (Spanish & English) and are required to communicate in english to residents and other staff. LPA spoke to S1, S2 and S3 in english and they responded back to LPA in english. LPA observed 3 staff asking residents if they wanted more juice or water in english during their lunch meals. Residents responded back to staff with requests for additional water, juice or other entrees. Continued on next page, LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiated LPA observed meals were served in plates and trays to residents on each dining table with drinks. LPA did not observe any coffee cups on the floor in the dining or bedroom areas. LPA observed some meals were delivered and served inside residents' bedrooms on tray tables. LPA observed S3 assisting a resident inside her bedroom with her lunch meal during visit. LPA also observed staff clearing used meal trays, plates and cups from the dining tables as soon as residents are done with their meals. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated. No deficiencies cited during visit. Exit Interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 13, 2022 · control 15-AS-20220912114903
Jun 22, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Health ChecksReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Health Checks
On 06/22/22 at 3:10PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Daisy Panlilio conducted a Health and Safety check as a result of the department receiving a priority 1 complaint. During the health and safety check, LPA observed a total of 8 staff and 24 residents at the memory care unit. LPA toured facility with administrator, including but not limited to bedrooms, kitchen, bathroom, and common areas. LPA observed 10 residents having snack in their common dining room while another 8 residents were relaxing in the visitation area. The rest of the residents were observed sleeping inside their bedrooms. The facility was observed to be in good repair. Common pathways were observed clear and free of fire hazards. Facility temperature was at 72 deg F. LPA observed residents to be comfortable in their surroundings. Residents in care appear to be safe and there are no imminent health/safety concerns on today's date. No deficiencies cited during the health and safety check. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 22, 2022
Jan 5, 2022Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident was attacked by another resident while in care
On 01/05/22 at 3PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Daisy Panlilio conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit, met with administrator, explained the purpose of the visit and delivered investigation findings. Allegation: Resident was attacked by another resident while in care Investigation finding: SUBSTANTIATED Based on LPA’s interviews which were conducted and record review(s), on 04/08/2020 at 6:35PM, facility staff fournd resident (R1) sitting on the floor with resident (R2) sitting on the couch. R1 stated R2 hit him on the face. Staff assessed R1 and observed R1 had a bump on the head and scratch on the nose. 911 was called and R1 was transported to the hospital. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) was found to be substantiated. Continued on next page, LIC 9099-C Substantiated Deficiency is cited per Title 22 California Code of Regulations and listed on LIC9099D. Failure to submit proof of correction (POC) by plan of correction due date and/or any repeat deficiencies within a 12-month period may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted. Appeal Rights and a copy of this report provided via email. R1 was sent to the hospital the same day (10/16/2020) and was cleared by the hospital to return to the facility with no new medications, Xray, CT scan all clear. On the second incident dated 10/19/2020, R1 had another un-witnessed fall at his apartment. Staff observed R1 had a significant bruise on his left leg and what looked like a broken nose. Staff immediately called 911 and sent R1 to the hospital for evaluation. Administrator stated that R1 never returned back to the facility from the hospital. R1 decided to relocate to another facility. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. No deficiencies cited. Exit Interview conducted and a copy of this report provided via email.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 5, 2022 · control 15-AS-20201020142344
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 5, 2022
To be accorded safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations, furnishings and equipment. This requirement was not met as evidenced by R1 being attacked by another resident which posed a potential health & safety risk to resident in carethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 5, 2022
Plan of correction: Administrator corrected deficiency on 04/08/2020. Both residents were immediately redirected by staff and monitored to ensure their safety.
Jan 5, 2022Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident is being illegally evicted Facility is incorrectly billing an SSI resident
On 01/05/22 at 4:30PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Daisy Panlilio conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit, met with administrator, explained the purpose of the visit and delivered investigation findings. Allegation: Resident is being illegally evicted Investigation Finding: SUBSTANTIATED Based on interviews and record reviews, LPA confirmed with administrator that resident (R1) was given a 30 day notice of eviction by the facility dated 05/03/2021 due to non-payment of the rate of basic services from 11/01/2020 to 04/30/2021. Effective date of termination was 06/02/2021. The facility has been informed of the resident's SSI status but they have proceeded with the eviction process. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) was found to be substantiated. Continued on next page, LIC 9099-C Substantiated Allegation: Facility is incorrectly billing an SSI resident Based on interviews and record reviews, LPA confirmed with neutral witness (W1) that R1 continues to be billed at the market rate even though facility have been informed of the resident's SSI eligibility and have been requested to send a bill for the correct amount. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) was found to be substantiated. Deficiencies are cited per Title 22 California Code of Regulations and listed on LIC9099D. Failure to submit proof of correction (POC) by plan of correction due date and/or any repeat deficiencies within a 12-month period may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted. Appeal Rights and a copy of this report provided via email.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 5, 2022 · control 15-AS-20210706122616
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87368.1(b)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 5, 2022
(b) All residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall be protected from all of the actions specified in this subsection (1) Deny admission to a facility, transfer or refuse to transfer a resident within the facility or to another facility, or discharge or evict a resident from a facility... This requirement was not met as evidenced by improper eviction of resident (R1) which posed a potential health & safety risk to resident in carethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 5, 2022
Plan of correction: Administrator corrected deficiency on 07/28/2021 where R1's notice of eviction was revoked.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87464(e) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 5, 2022
If the resident is an SSI/SSP recipient, then the basic services shall be provided and/or made available at the basic rate at no additional charge to the resident. This requirement was not met as evidenced by resident being charged the market rate which posed a potential health & safety risk to resident in carethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 5, 2022
Plan of correction: Administrator corrected deficiency on 07/28/2021. R1's monthly invoices from 11/2020 until 07/2021 were adjusted to reflect the appropriate SSI rate.
Jan 5, 2022Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not respond to resident's calling for assistance
On 01/05/22 at 5:25PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Daisy Panlilio conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit, met with administrator, explained the purpose of the visit and delivered investigation findings. Allegation: Staff did not respond to resident's calling for assistance Investigation Finding: SUBSTANTIATED Based on LPA's interviews and record reviews, staff (S1) admitted to wellness coordinator that on 07/12/2021 she took resident (R1) to the toilet and never came back for more that 2 hours because she turned her radio down. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) was found to be substantiated. Continued on next page, LIC 9099-C Substantiated Deficiency is cited per Title 22 California Code of Regulations and listed on LIC9099D. Failure to submit proof of correction (POC) by plan of correction due date and/or any repeat deficiencies within a 12-month period may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted. Appeal Rights and a copy of this report provided via email.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 5, 2022 · control 15-AS-20210715151325
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87464(4) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 5, 2022
Personal assistance and care as needed by the resident and as indicated in the pre-admission appraisal, with those activities of daily living such as dressing, eating, bathing and assistance with taking prescribed medications This requirement was not met as evidenced by staff not responding to resident's calling for assistance which posed a potential health & safety risk to residents in carethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 5, 2022
Plan of correction: Administrator corrected deficiency on 07/16/21. Incident was internally investigated and staff terminated. Administrator conducts monthly staff meetings to remind all staff to follow established care and supervision protocols at all times.
Jan 5, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 01/05/22 at 1:55PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Daisy Panlilio conducted an infection control annual inspection and explained the purpose of the visit with administrator. Facility has a completed mitigation plan in place dated 01/23/2021 to mitigate the spread of COVID-19. LPA discussed the completed mitigation plan (LIC 808) with administrator as well as COVID-19 infection control practices. LPA observed screening station located near the front entrance with visitor's log, hand sanitizer, gloves, face masks and no touch temperature probe. Routine symptom screening (+/-) temperature and symptom check) is done at entry for all staff, residents and visitors. LPA observed COVID-19 signages posted in common areas to promote hand washing, cough/sneeze etiquette and physical distancing. Facility documents daily temperatures and COVID-19 symptom checks for staff and residents. Pathways were observed to be free of obstruction and fire hazards. Facility has 3 spacious living/visitation areas inside for social distancing among residents. Continued on next page LIC 809-C LPA observed PPE cart located outside of 1st floor isolation wing. Facility has conducted staff training on infection prevention, symptoms, transmission and proper donning & doffing of PPE. Trash bins with lid operated with foot pedal were located inside bedrooms, bathrooms and kitchen. Infection control designated leader is the administrator. All staff and residents have been fully vaccinated since January 2021.There was at least 7 days of nonperishable and 2 days of perishable foods. PPE supplies were observed stored in the 3rd floor storage room. Facility room temperature was maintained at 72 degrees Fahrenheit. Administrator is on site a minimum of 20 hours a week to oversee proper business operation and compliance with COVID-19 infection control practices. Fire extinguisher was observed fully charged. Smoke and Carbon monoxide detectors were operational. No deficiencies observed during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided via email.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 5, 2022
115 of 131 beds were occupied at the January 21, 2026 state visit, the most recent — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Treg Antioch I Op Co Director LLC; Agemark Mgt LLC, licensed since 2018.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2018, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 23
- Total complaints
- 9
- Substantiated allegations
- 7
- Type A citations
- 1
- Type B citations
- 6
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2018, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 1 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 6 | 1 |
| Substantiated allegations | 7 | 2 |
| Total complaints | 9 | 6 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Trevista Antioch
Is Trevista Antioch licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Trevista Antioch licensed for?
131 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Trevista Antioch been cited?
1 Type A and 6 Type B citations since 2018, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 23 state visits over the same years.
Is Trevista Antioch still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 12, 2026.
What does Trevista Antioch cost?
$5,050 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,950–$6,450. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 15 communities with 50 or more beds within 15 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 27 other homes of a similar licensed size across Contra Costa County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,144 to $6,637 a month, and the middle figure is $5,445 (n = 27 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Trevista Antioch take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Treg Antioch I Op Co Director LLC; Agemark Mgt LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. See the homes licensed to Agemark Mgmt LLC — at least 6 on the state roster.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Sutter Delta Medical Center is 0.4 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Trevista Antioch keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 15 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Trevista Antioch license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “TREVISTA ANTIOCH”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #79200748. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 131 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to Treg Antioch I Op Co Director LLC; Agemark Mgt LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2018, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 23 state inspection visits since 2018, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 1 Type A and 6 Type B citations on file since 2018, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 23 state visits in that period.
- 9 complaints and 7 substantiated allegations on file since 2018, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is January 21, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in Contra Costa County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Starting rate
$4,355 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,850 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,000–$6,000On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,050 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,150–$6,200On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,100 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,150–$6,250On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,050 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,150–$6,200On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,950 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,050–$6,100On the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore Contra Costa County