Carlton Plaza Of Davis is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Davis, Yolo County, California — state license #577005341, licensed for 150 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 28 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated April 30, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

4 homes in view

Carlton Plaza Of Davis

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 150 residents · Davis, CA · Yolo County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceBedriddenMemory care not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #577005341, held since 2014 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
2726 5th Street · Davis, Yolo County
Phone
(530) 564-7002
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 140 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 20 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 10 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
LICENSED FOR A TOTAL OF 150 RESIDENTS AGES 60 AND ABOVE. FIRE CLEARANCE GRANTED FOR 140 NONAMBULATORY AND 10 BEDRIDDEN RESIDENTS. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 20.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 31 times and filed 28 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated April 30, 2026.

Most recent state visit
April 30, 2026
Occupancy at the July 1, 2025 visit
136 of 150 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 8 documents with transcribed findings, dated March 23, 2022 to July 1, 2025. 8 of the 8 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (4), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (3). 8 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 8 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 19 of 28 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20265 state visits · 5 documents
Apr 30, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 24, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 21, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 24, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 22, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20256 state visits · 8 documents
Nov 18, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 23, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 1, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not respond to residents' call for assistance in a timely manner Staff do not follow residents' care plan

On July 1, 2025, Program Analyst (LPA) Nakagawa arrived unannounced to continue a complaint investigation and deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA spoke with Administrator Blaine Lyons. The complaint alleges that Staff do not respond to residents’ call lights for assistance in a timely manner. LPA requested call light records for 1/20/25 through 2/19/2025. There were 310 calls in Memory Care for that time frame. LPA looked at a sample of the records for 1/20/25 through 1/23/25 and found 59 calls; with 53 of those calls being answered within 1-4 minutes. There were 4 calls that took between 13-38 minutes and 2 calls that took between 1 hour and 11 minutes and 1 hour and 15 minutes. Although most of the response times were well within best practices, the two calls that took over an hour demonstrate that Staff do not respond to residents’ calls for assistance in a timely manner; other days examined within the time frame of 1/20/25 to 2/19/25 had similar findings: 2/13/25 throughthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 1, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250219114000
May 15, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 6, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not taking precautions to mitigate the spread of illness in the facility

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) opened an investigation regarding the above allegation and found the following through the conducting of interviews and reviewing documents. The Administrator stated that the facility’s Infection Control Plan abides by the strictest protocols in place when giving care to residents. On 12/30/2024 the Administrator was aware of resident (R1) experiencing vomiting, and diagnosed with pneumonia. This was reported to CCL on 1/08/2025. There were no other cases reported to CCL until 1/31/2025. Administrator informed CCL by email that there were several residents with GI issues. Residents were notified by written notice posted at their doors of the increase in cases, courtesy room service was extended to all residents; dining room remained open. (Continued on 9099-C) Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 6, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250131155017
May 6, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 4, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 4, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20244 state visits · 6 documents
Oct 19, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure residents toileting needs are met in a timely manner Staff are not providing residents with adequate food service Staff do not keep the facility free from odor Staff did not address changes to resident's physical, medical, mental, and social condition

On 10/19/2024 LPA Nakagawa arrived unannounced to conclude an investigation and deliver findings regarding the above allegations. LPA met with the acting facilities director of the day, Genai Bradshaw, Memory Care Activities Director. The complaint alleges that staff are not providing residents with adequate food service. LPA conducted facility visits on 07/24/2024 and 10/19/2024. LPA observed breakfast and lunch service in the memory care (MC) and assisted living units (AL). LPA observed an ample supply of food, which appeared to be varied and of high quality, meeting the nutritional standards as required per Title 22. LPA observed staff assisting residents who required help with feeding; staff prompted or assisted residents as needed. In addition to 3 meals a day, there are also snacks and hydration breaks available throughout the day. Continued on 9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 19, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240722163924
May 30, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 8, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 9, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Neglect/Lack of Care and Supervision resulting in severe injury Facility in disrepair

Licensing Program Analyst Nakagawa arrived unannounced to deliver findings of an investigation regarding the allegations that the facility’s neglect resulted in resident’s injury and that the facility is in disrepair. The Department conducted an investigation which revealed that Staff (S1) reported that on 2/17/2023, at approximately 1800 hours, surveillance video recordings showed Resident (R1) exit through the facility's patio door leading outside unsupervised. At the same time, Staff (S2) was observed on camera in the living room area close to the patio door but did not respond to the patio door alarm. (Continued on 9099-C) Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 9, 2024 · control 21-AS-20230724142905
Jan 9, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 9, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations3typical 1
Type B citations4typical 1
Substantiated complaints7typical 2
Total complaints8typical 7
State visits on file31typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2014.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20265502025682202446120232202022671
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Yolo County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2025 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (530) 564-7002

Is Carlton Plaza Of Davis licensed?

Yes — Carlton Plaza Of Davis is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Davis (Yolo County): California license #577005341, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 150 residents. State records list 28 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated April 30, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Carlton Plaza Of Davis care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Carlton Plaza Of Davis with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordLICENSED FOR A TOTAL OF 150 RESIDENTS AGES 60 AND ABOVE. FIRE CLEARANCE GRANTED FOR 140 NONAMBULATORY AND 10 BEDRIDDEN RESIDENTS. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 20.

How much does Carlton Plaza Of Davis cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Carlton Plaza Of Davis's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Yolo County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Carlton Plaza Of Davis accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Carlton Plaza Of Davis is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

136 of 150 beds occupied (91%) when the state visited on July 1, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Carlton Plaza Of Davis?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 31 state visits and 28 dated documents since 2022 for Carlton Plaza Of Davis; 8 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated July 1, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

8 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not respond to residents' call for assistance in a timely manner Staff do not follow residents' care plan
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On July 1, 2025, Program Analyst (LPA) Nakagawa arrived unannounced to continue a complaint investigation and deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA spoke with Administrator Blaine Lyons. The complaint alleges that Staff do not respond to residents’ call lights for assistance in a timely manner. LPA requested call light records for 1/20/25 through 2/19/2025. There were 310 calls in Memory Care for that time frame. LPA looked at a sample of the records for 1/20/25 through 1/23/25 and found 59 calls; with 53 of those calls being answered within 1-4 minutes. There were 4 calls that took between 13-38 minutes and 2 calls that took between 1 hour and 11 minutes and 1 hour and 15 minutes. Although most of the response times were well within best practices, the two calls that took over an hour demonstrate that Staff do not respond to residents’ calls for assistance in a timely manner; other days examined within the time frame of 1/20/25 to 2/19/25 had similar findings: 2/13/25 throughCDSS inspection report, July 1, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250219114000
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not taking precautions to mitigate the spread of illness in the facility
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) opened an investigation regarding the above allegation and found the following through the conducting of interviews and reviewing documents. The Administrator stated that the facility’s Infection Control Plan abides by the strictest protocols in place when giving care to residents. On 12/30/2024 the Administrator was aware of resident (R1) experiencing vomiting, and diagnosed with pneumonia. This was reported to CCL on 1/08/2025. There were no other cases reported to CCL until 1/31/2025. Administrator informed CCL by email that there were several residents with GI issues. Residents were notified by written notice posted at their doors of the increase in cases, courtesy room service was extended to all residents; dining room remained open. (Continued on 9099-C) SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 6, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250131155017

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not ensure residents toileting needs are met in a timely manner Staff are not providing residents with adequate food service Staff do not keep the facility free from odor Staff did not address changes to resident's physical, medical, mental, and social condition
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 10/19/2024 LPA Nakagawa arrived unannounced to conclude an investigation and deliver findings regarding the above allegations. LPA met with the acting facilities director of the day, Genai Bradshaw, Memory Care Activities Director. The complaint alleges that staff are not providing residents with adequate food service. LPA conducted facility visits on 07/24/2024 and 10/19/2024. LPA observed breakfast and lunch service in the memory care (MC) and assisted living units (AL). LPA observed an ample supply of food, which appeared to be varied and of high quality, meeting the nutritional standards as required per Title 22. LPA observed staff assisting residents who required help with feeding; staff prompted or assisted residents as needed. In addition to 3 meals a day, there are also snacks and hydration breaks available throughout the day. Continued on 9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 19, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240722163924
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedNeglect/Lack of Care and Supervision resulting in severe injury Facility in disrepair
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst Nakagawa arrived unannounced to deliver findings of an investigation regarding the allegations that the facility’s neglect resulted in resident’s injury and that the facility is in disrepair. The Department conducted an investigation which revealed that Staff (S1) reported that on 2/17/2023, at approximately 1800 hours, surveillance video recordings showed Resident (R1) exit through the facility's patio door leading outside unsupervised. At the same time, Staff (S2) was observed on camera in the living room area close to the patio door but did not respond to the patio door alarm. (Continued on 9099-C) SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 9, 2024 · control 21-AS-20230724142905

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not notice change of resident condition.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 9/29/2022 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nakagawa arrived at Carlton Plaza unannounced to deliver findings to the facility regarding the above allegation and was greeted by Administrator, Miriam Faris. During the investigation, the Department toured the facility, reviewed records, and conducted interviews with staff, clients and outside parties. The complaint alleges that the facility did not notice a change in condition of resident (R1). Based on the LPA’s interviews with staff, residents, outside parties and a review of care notes, the 602, pre-assessment, medical records, and resident documents (Care Tracker) which show dates and times of resident (R1) being fed, toileted, receiving grooming assistance and attempts at medication administration; whether completed or refused. Records also indicate multiple calls to PCP, family, and EMS. Based on this information, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged viCDSS inspection report, September 29, 2022 · control 21-AS-20220902085213
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedQuestionable Death
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Jill Nakagawa and Chris Arnhold arrived unannounced and met with Miriam Faris, Administrator to continue this complaint investigation and deliver findings. During the course of this investigation, the facility was toured, records were reviewed, and interviews conducted. The above allegation alleges that a resident had a fall resulting in injury then passed away. LPA reviewed resident records and found that, although resident did suffer two falls over the course of 5 days, EMS and Hospice agencies were contacted at the time and assessed the resident. The evaluation resulted in resident not being transported to the hospital for care or treatment. Review of the Death Certificate show the cause of death was not related or a result of the fall. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging Questionable Death. We have found that the complaint was unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable baCDSS inspection report, April 28, 2022 · control 21-AS-20220127102600
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResidents are not being provided services. Facility is not staffed adequately.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jill Nakagawa and Chris Arnhold arrived unannounced and met with Miriam Faris, Administrator to continue this complaint investigation and deliver findings. During the course of this investigation, the facility was toured, records were reviewed, and interviews conducted. Residents not being provided services – this complaint alleges that the residents are not being provided showers, being fed, nor being provided bathroom services. LPA reviewed resident documents which show dates and times of residents being fed, toileted, and receiving grooming assistance. These reports demonstrate that the residents are indeed being fed regularly, bathroom services are being provided and showering assistance is provided. Report showed the date and time of a shower, whether it was completed or refused, and how much time was spent with the resident. LPA reviewed 6 months’ worth of staffing records for the facility and found facility had staff to meet the needs of the residCDSS inspection report, April 28, 2022 · control 21-AS-20220228111741
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident not provided bed linens Facility is not following proper protocol for COVID-19
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nakagawa arrived unannounced and met with LIndsey Feifert, Director of Resident Services, to continue this complaint investigation and deliver findings. During the course of this investigation the facility was toured, records and photos were reviewed and interviews conducted. It is alleged that Resident not provided bed linens. Photographs and observation revealed that the bed of R1 was not made correctly. Per regulation the licensee shall provide clean linens, which include a top sheet, bottom sheet, pillow cases, mattress pads, blankets and bedspread. The proper bottom bed sheet was lacking on more than one occasion, therefore this allegation is substantiated. A finding that the complaint is substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. Continued on 9099-C SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 23, 2022 · control 21-AS-20220124085943

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 31 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
3
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
4
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
7
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
8
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
31
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(530) 564-7002
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Carlton Plaza Of Davis? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.