Palms At Bonaventure Assisted Living, The is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Ventura, Ventura County, California — state license #565802467, with a licensed capacity of 121, listed as closed, change of ownership in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 25 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated May 7, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

252 homes in view

Palms At Bonaventure Assisted Living, The

The state record lists this licence as “Closed, Change of Ownership”. A closed licence cannot admit residents. We keep closed licences published because “is this place licensed?” deserves an honest answer.

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 121 residents · Ventura, CA · Ventura County
Closed in state recordWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days · we confirm by phone before any referral
License #565802467, held since 2018 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
111 N Wells Road · Ventura, Ventura County
Phone
(805) 647-0616
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 121 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 18 residents
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 121 NON-AMBULATORY. APPROVED FOR DELAYED EGRESS. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 18. NEW MANAGEMENT COMPANY, INTEGRAL SENIOR LIVING MANAGEMENT, LLC EFFECTIVE 12/15/2021.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 29 times and filed 25 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated May 7, 2026.

Most recent state visit
May 7, 2026
Occupancy at the September 26, 2025 visit
99 of 0 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 17 documents with transcribed findings, dated March 18, 2022 to September 26, 2025. 17 of the 17 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (4), “Unsubstantiated” (13). 17 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 17 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 13 of 25 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20261 state visit · 1 document
May 7, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20253 state visits · 3 documents
Sep 26, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility is not providing resident with low carb food options for their dietary needs. Facility restrooms are unkempt Facility staff lost residents personal items Facility staff do not afford resident dignity and respect.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Zabel Chochian conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver investigation finding for the above noted allegations. Upon arrival LPA met with Executive Director (ED) Brandy McCauley and reason for the visit was explained. On 05/08/2025, Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) received a complaint with the above allegations. Investigation was initiated by LPA Teresa Camara on 05/16/2025. LPA met with Administrator/Executive Director (ED) Brandy McCauley and the reason for the visit was explained. At 11:10 a.m. LPA Camara interviewed ED and obtained a copy of the resident roster. At 11:49 a.m. LPA Camara inspected restrooms near the dining room. On 08/16/2025, LPA Zabel Chochian conducted a subsequent complaint visit to further investigate allegations noted above. LPA Chochian met with the Activity Director John White and explained the reason for the visit. Executive Director (ED) Brandy McCauley was contacted and informed of LPA's visit. Copy of thethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 26, 2025 · control 29-AS-20250508164959
May 7, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not following protocol for communicable disease. Staff did not provide adequate food service to resident. Staff did not ensure resident's room is free of pest. Staff did not treat resident with dignity. Staff did not safeguard resident's personal belongings. Staff did not respond to resident's calls for assistance in a timely manner.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Teresa Camara conducted a subsequent complaint investigation visit. LPA met with Administrator Brandy McCauley and explained the reason for the visit. On 1/8/2025, LPA reviewed and obtained documents and interviewed three staff. During today's visit LPA interviewed ten (10) residents and three (3) more staff. Regarding the allegation staff are not following protocol for communicable disease: Residents who were interviewed that were present at the facility during a COVID outbreak stated residents were offered masks, all staff wore masks and gloves, and their cleaning protocols seemed sufficient. Staff stated they were given refresher training, and wore masks and gloves. The staff stated they would wear N95 masks, gowns, (continued on LIC9099-C, page 2) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 7, 2025 · control 29-AS-20241230101400
Apr 3, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident was assaulted by another resident while in care Staff did not prevent resident from entering another resident's room

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kelly Dulek conducted a subsequent complaint investigation with the purpose continuing the investigation related to the above noted allegations. LPA met with Administrator Brandy McCauley and explained the reason for the visit. During today's visit, LPA spoke with Administrator at 11:22AM, interviewed staff from 11:30AM to 02:31PM. During an initial complaint visit conducted on 12/30/2024, LPA interviewed Administrator at 11:00AM, interviewed the Memory Care Director at 11:15AM, toured the facility with Memory Care Director beginning at 11:52AM, interviewed resident's family member at 11:57AM, observed both Resident #1 (R1) and Resident #2 (R2), and LPA obtained copies of relevant documents. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA reviewed all relevant documents and conducted additional interviews over the phone. The following was then determined: Report Continued on LIC 9099-C Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 3, 2025 · control 29-AS-20241223164716
20246 state visits · 6 documents
Dec 17, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not safeguard resident's funds

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Teresa Camara conducted a complaint investigation visit regarding the above noted allegation. LPA met with administrator Brandy McCauley and explained the reason for the visit. At 12:53 p.m. LPA interviewed administrator, at 1:07 p.m. LPA interviewed the resident care director and at 1:57 p.m. LPA interviewed resident 1 (R1) by phone while at the facility. R1 confirmed the alleged perpetrator (P1) of the financial abuse was not an employee of this facility. P1 was someone R1 met through a nurse from an outside agency. P1 presented themself as an unemployed registered nurse who offered to help R1 with shopping and other personal assistance. R1 stated they (continued on LIC9099-C, page 2) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 17, 2024 · control 29-AS-20241210133314
Oct 23, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 25, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained pressure injuries while in care. Staff leaves resident in bed for extended periods of time. Staff does not ensure resident is fed or is provided water. Staff leaves resident without light.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Esther Cortez conducted a subsequent investigation visit to the facility regarding the above noted allegations. LPA met with executive director (ED) Brandy McCauley and explained the reason for the visit. On 02/06/2023 at 2:27 p.m. LPA Camera met with ED and resident care director Mary Ventura. Based on complaint allegations it was determined the complaint was regarding resident #1 (R1). At 3:08 p.m. LPA Camera reviewed and obtained pertinent records. At 3:14 p.m. LPA interviewed R1. On 12/14/2023 LPA Cortez obtained pertinent documents and conducted two (2) staff and one (1) resident interviews between 8:20 a.m. and 11:00 a.m. On 09/24/2024, between 10:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., LPA Cortez interviewed the ED, five (5) staff, conducted a file review, and obtained copies of resident records and other pertinent documents relevant to the investigation. During today's vist LPA Cortez observed seven (7) resident rooms, and conducted six (6) resident interviews. Rthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 25, 2024 · control 29-AS-20230202125108
Sep 19, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 13, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff caused injury to resident Resident sustained injuries while in care Facility did not properly transfer resident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Zabel Chochian conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver findings for the above allegations. LPA met with Executive Director Brandy McCauley and explained the reason for the visit. On 04/10/2023, the Department received a complaint of Neglect/Lack of Care and Supervision alleging staff caused injury to Resident #1 (R1). It was alleged R1 sustained injuries while in care and the facility did not properly transfer R1. The complaint was referred to the Community Care Licensing Investigations Branch (IB) and assigned to Investigator Juan Lozano. On 04/12/2023, from 11:45 a.m. to 3:45 p.m., LPA Chochian conducted an unannounced complaint visit. The LPA reviewed facility incident reports for 2022-2023 and reviewed ten (10) resident records from 12:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. During the visit, the LPA was given a tour of the facility by staff Harmony Langarica. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 13, 2024 · control 29-AS-20230410091906
Apr 29, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Due to neglect, resident received the wrong medication

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kelly Dulek conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit for the allegation listed above. Due to Public Health concerns at the facility, today’s visit was conducted via telephone with the facility Executive Director (ED) Brandy McCauley. Entrance interview conducted. During an initial complaint visit conducted on 11/22/2023, at 09:36AM, LPA along with ED, toured the facility. LPA reviewed facility incident records for October - November 2023 and reviewed and obtained copies of pertinent documents. A referral was made to Community Care Licensing Division's (CCLD) Investigation Branch (IB). IB Investigator Dennis Seng then continued the investigation into the above allegation. Investigator Seng conducted both telephonic and in person interviews with relevant parties on the following dates: 12/13/2023, 12/14/2023, 02/16/2024. Throughout the course of the investigation, Investigator Seng reviewed medical records for Resident #1 (R1), who was named inthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2024 · control 29-AS-20231121084529
20233 state visits · 3 documents
Dec 14, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained a pressure injury while in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Esther Cortez conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver findings for the above allegation. The LPA met with Administrator Brandy McCauley and explained the reason for the visit. On 05/17/2021, LPA Rosales conducted the initial 10-day complaint visit from 11:25 AM – 6:00 PM, the LPA reviewed resident records, obtained copies of pertinent documents, and interviewed residents. LPA Smith conducted a subsequent complaint visit on 06/13/2023 from 9:45 AM – 2:30 PM, interviewed nine (9) staff, conducted a medication audit, and interviewed four (4) residents. On 10/03/2023, LPA Cortez toured the facility with administrator Brandy McCauley at 10:00 am, reviewed all staff and resident interviews conducted by LPA Rosales and Smith, and interviewed two (2) staff and two (2) residents between 10:20 a.m. and 11:30 a.m. Report will continue on LIC9099-C. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 14, 2023 · control 29-AS-20210514112111
Oct 18, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 3, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff handle residents in a rough manner Staff does not assist with incontinence care Insufficient staffing

At 8:40 a.m. Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Esther Cortez conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to the above facility to continue investigation of the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator Brandy McCauley and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Rosales conducted the initial 10-day complaint visit on 05/17/2021 at 11:25 AM – 6:00 PM, the LPA reviewed resident records, obtained copies of pertinent documents and interviewed random residents. LPA Smith conducted a subsequent complaint visit on 06/13/2023 at 9:45 AM – 2:30 PM, interviewed nine (9) staff, conducted a medication audit, and interviewed four (4) residents. Today, LPA Cortez toured the facility with administrator Brandy McCauley at 10:00 am, reviewed all staff and resident interviews conducted by LPA Rosales and Smith, and interviewed two (2) staff and two (2) residents between 10:20 a.m. and 11:30 a.m. Report will continue on LIC9099-C. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 3, 2023 · control 29-AS-20210514112111
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations3typical 1
Type B citations0typical 1
Substantiated complaints6typical 2
Total complaints15typical 7
State visits on file29typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2018.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20261102025331202466120231011120224512021110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Ventura County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one.
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →

Is Palms At Bonaventure Assisted Living, The licensed?

No — not currently. The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists Palms At Bonaventure Assisted Living, The in Ventura (Ventura County), California license #565802467, as “Closed, Change Of Ownership, formerly licensed for 121 residents. State records list 25 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated May 7, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Palms At Bonaventure Assisted Living, The care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Palms At Bonaventure Assisted Living, The with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, and hospice care; it does not list bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 121 NON-AMBULATORY. APPROVED FOR DELAYED EGRESS. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 18. NEW MANAGEMENT COMPANY, INTEGRAL SENIOR LIVING MANAGEMENT, LLC EFFECTIVE 12/15/2021.

How much does Palms At Bonaventure Assisted Living, The cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Palms At Bonaventure Assisted Living, The's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Ventura County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Palms At Bonaventure Assisted Living, The accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Palms At Bonaventure Assisted Living, The is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

99 of 0 beds occupied (0%) when the state visited on September 26, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Palms At Bonaventure Assisted Living, The?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 29 state visits and 25 dated documents since 2021 for Palms At Bonaventure Assisted Living, The; 17 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated September 26, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

17 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is not providing resident with low carb food options for their dietary needs. Facility restrooms are unkempt Facility staff lost residents personal items Facility staff do not afford resident dignity and respect.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Zabel Chochian conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver investigation finding for the above noted allegations. Upon arrival LPA met with Executive Director (ED) Brandy McCauley and reason for the visit was explained. On 05/08/2025, Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) received a complaint with the above allegations. Investigation was initiated by LPA Teresa Camara on 05/16/2025. LPA met with Administrator/Executive Director (ED) Brandy McCauley and the reason for the visit was explained. At 11:10 a.m. LPA Camara interviewed ED and obtained a copy of the resident roster. At 11:49 a.m. LPA Camara inspected restrooms near the dining room. On 08/16/2025, LPA Zabel Chochian conducted a subsequent complaint visit to further investigate allegations noted above. LPA Chochian met with the Activity Director John White and explained the reason for the visit. Executive Director (ED) Brandy McCauley was contacted and informed of LPA's visit. Copy of theCDSS inspection report, September 26, 2025 · control 29-AS-20250508164959
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not following protocol for communicable disease. Staff did not provide adequate food service to resident. Staff did not ensure resident's room is free of pest. Staff did not treat resident with dignity. Staff did not safeguard resident's personal belongings. Staff did not respond to resident's calls for assistance in a timely manner.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Teresa Camara conducted a subsequent complaint investigation visit. LPA met with Administrator Brandy McCauley and explained the reason for the visit. On 1/8/2025, LPA reviewed and obtained documents and interviewed three staff. During today's visit LPA interviewed ten (10) residents and three (3) more staff. Regarding the allegation staff are not following protocol for communicable disease: Residents who were interviewed that were present at the facility during a COVID outbreak stated residents were offered masks, all staff wore masks and gloves, and their cleaning protocols seemed sufficient. Staff stated they were given refresher training, and wore masks and gloves. The staff stated they would wear N95 masks, gowns, (continued on LIC9099-C, page 2) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 7, 2025 · control 29-AS-20241230101400
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident was assaulted by another resident while in care Staff did not prevent resident from entering another resident's room
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kelly Dulek conducted a subsequent complaint investigation with the purpose continuing the investigation related to the above noted allegations. LPA met with Administrator Brandy McCauley and explained the reason for the visit. During today's visit, LPA spoke with Administrator at 11:22AM, interviewed staff from 11:30AM to 02:31PM. During an initial complaint visit conducted on 12/30/2024, LPA interviewed Administrator at 11:00AM, interviewed the Memory Care Director at 11:15AM, toured the facility with Memory Care Director beginning at 11:52AM, interviewed resident's family member at 11:57AM, observed both Resident #1 (R1) and Resident #2 (R2), and LPA obtained copies of relevant documents. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA reviewed all relevant documents and conducted additional interviews over the phone. The following was then determined: Report Continued on LIC 9099-C SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 3, 2025 · control 29-AS-20241223164716

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not safeguard resident's funds
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Teresa Camara conducted a complaint investigation visit regarding the above noted allegation. LPA met with administrator Brandy McCauley and explained the reason for the visit. At 12:53 p.m. LPA interviewed administrator, at 1:07 p.m. LPA interviewed the resident care director and at 1:57 p.m. LPA interviewed resident 1 (R1) by phone while at the facility. R1 confirmed the alleged perpetrator (P1) of the financial abuse was not an employee of this facility. P1 was someone R1 met through a nurse from an outside agency. P1 presented themself as an unemployed registered nurse who offered to help R1 with shopping and other personal assistance. R1 stated they (continued on LIC9099-C, page 2) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 17, 2024 · control 29-AS-20241210133314
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained pressure injuries while in care. Staff leaves resident in bed for extended periods of time. Staff does not ensure resident is fed or is provided water. Staff leaves resident without light.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Esther Cortez conducted a subsequent investigation visit to the facility regarding the above noted allegations. LPA met with executive director (ED) Brandy McCauley and explained the reason for the visit. On 02/06/2023 at 2:27 p.m. LPA Camera met with ED and resident care director Mary Ventura. Based on complaint allegations it was determined the complaint was regarding resident #1 (R1). At 3:08 p.m. LPA Camera reviewed and obtained pertinent records. At 3:14 p.m. LPA interviewed R1. On 12/14/2023 LPA Cortez obtained pertinent documents and conducted two (2) staff and one (1) resident interviews between 8:20 a.m. and 11:00 a.m. On 09/24/2024, between 10:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., LPA Cortez interviewed the ED, five (5) staff, conducted a file review, and obtained copies of resident records and other pertinent documents relevant to the investigation. During today's vist LPA Cortez observed seven (7) resident rooms, and conducted six (6) resident interviews. RCDSS inspection report, September 25, 2024 · control 29-AS-20230202125108
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff caused injury to resident Resident sustained injuries while in care Facility did not properly transfer resident
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Zabel Chochian conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver findings for the above allegations. LPA met with Executive Director Brandy McCauley and explained the reason for the visit. On 04/10/2023, the Department received a complaint of Neglect/Lack of Care and Supervision alleging staff caused injury to Resident #1 (R1). It was alleged R1 sustained injuries while in care and the facility did not properly transfer R1. The complaint was referred to the Community Care Licensing Investigations Branch (IB) and assigned to Investigator Juan Lozano. On 04/12/2023, from 11:45 a.m. to 3:45 p.m., LPA Chochian conducted an unannounced complaint visit. The LPA reviewed facility incident reports for 2022-2023 and reviewed ten (10) resident records from 12:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. During the visit, the LPA was given a tour of the facility by staff Harmony Langarica. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 13, 2024 · control 29-AS-20230410091906
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedDue to neglect, resident received the wrong medication
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kelly Dulek conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit for the allegation listed above. Due to Public Health concerns at the facility, today’s visit was conducted via telephone with the facility Executive Director (ED) Brandy McCauley. Entrance interview conducted. During an initial complaint visit conducted on 11/22/2023, at 09:36AM, LPA along with ED, toured the facility. LPA reviewed facility incident records for October - November 2023 and reviewed and obtained copies of pertinent documents. A referral was made to Community Care Licensing Division's (CCLD) Investigation Branch (IB). IB Investigator Dennis Seng then continued the investigation into the above allegation. Investigator Seng conducted both telephonic and in person interviews with relevant parties on the following dates: 12/13/2023, 12/14/2023, 02/16/2024. Throughout the course of the investigation, Investigator Seng reviewed medical records for Resident #1 (R1), who was named inCDSS inspection report, April 29, 2024 · control 29-AS-20231121084529

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained a pressure injury while in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Esther Cortez conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver findings for the above allegation. The LPA met with Administrator Brandy McCauley and explained the reason for the visit. On 05/17/2021, LPA Rosales conducted the initial 10-day complaint visit from 11:25 AM – 6:00 PM, the LPA reviewed resident records, obtained copies of pertinent documents, and interviewed residents. LPA Smith conducted a subsequent complaint visit on 06/13/2023 from 9:45 AM – 2:30 PM, interviewed nine (9) staff, conducted a medication audit, and interviewed four (4) residents. On 10/03/2023, LPA Cortez toured the facility with administrator Brandy McCauley at 10:00 am, reviewed all staff and resident interviews conducted by LPA Rosales and Smith, and interviewed two (2) staff and two (2) residents between 10:20 a.m. and 11:30 a.m. Report will continue on LIC9099-C. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 14, 2023 · control 29-AS-20210514112111
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff handle residents in a rough manner Staff does not assist with incontinence care Insufficient staffing
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
At 8:40 a.m. Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Esther Cortez conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to the above facility to continue investigation of the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator Brandy McCauley and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Rosales conducted the initial 10-day complaint visit on 05/17/2021 at 11:25 AM – 6:00 PM, the LPA reviewed resident records, obtained copies of pertinent documents and interviewed random residents. LPA Smith conducted a subsequent complaint visit on 06/13/2023 at 9:45 AM – 2:30 PM, interviewed nine (9) staff, conducted a medication audit, and interviewed four (4) residents. Today, LPA Cortez toured the facility with administrator Brandy McCauley at 10:00 am, reviewed all staff and resident interviews conducted by LPA Rosales and Smith, and interviewed two (2) staff and two (2) residents between 10:20 a.m. and 11:30 a.m. Report will continue on LIC9099-C. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 3, 2023 · control 29-AS-20210514112111
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff mishandle the residents medications while in care Staff is administering unauthorized medications to residents
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ashley Smith arrived unannounced to conduct a subsequent complaint visit. The LPA met with Executive Director Brandy McCauley and explained the reason for the visit. On 05/24/2021, LPA’s Kelly Dulek and Martha Guzman-Chavez conducted an initial visit from 10:05 a.m. – 1:00 p.m., where they spoke with staff, conducted a tour, gathered documents, and conducted a medication audit. On 6/13/2023, LPA Smith interviewed nine (9) staff from 10:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m., conducted a medication audit from 12:15 p.m. - 1:45 p.m., and interviewed four (4) residents from 1:50 p.m. - 2:30 p.m. Today, LPA Smith interviewed five (5) staff from 9:40 – 10:30 a.m., and interviewed three (3) residents from 10:35 a.m. – 11:20 a.m. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, June 19, 2023 · control 29-AS-20210520121117
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedInsufficient staffing
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ashley Smith arrived unannounced to deliver the findings for the above allegations. The LPA met with Executive Director Brandy McCauley and explained the reason for the visit. On 2/08/2022, LPA Joann Rosales conducted a visit from 11:00 a.m. – 4:30 p.m., in which LPA Rosales toured the facility, interviewed staff and residents, and obtained documents. On 02/28/2022, LPA Rosales conducted a subsequent visit from 10:55 a.m. – 4:10 p.m., in which LPA Rosales interviewed random residents and staff, and obtained additional documents. The allegation of ‘insufficient staffing’ alleges that the facility was understaffed in January and February of 2022, which resulted in staff being required to work with residents although staff were positive with COVID-19. Per interviews conducted by LPA Rosales on 2/8/2022 and 2/28/2022, staff revealed that a number of staff were requested to work, despite being symptomatic and COVID-19 positive. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 22, 2023 · control 29-AS-20220201121402
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedDue to neglect, resident sustained pressure injury while in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ashley Smith conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver findings for the above allegation. LPA met with Brandy McCauley and explained the reason for the visit. Concerns were that due to neglect, resident #1 (R1) sustained pressure injury while in care. On 06/04/2021, LPA JoAnn Rosales conducted an initial visit from 10:10 a.m. – 5:00 p.m., to which LPA Rosales toured the facility, interviewed staff and residents, and obtained pertinent documents. LPA Rosales reviewed R1’s records on 6/4/21 starting at 11:39 am. R1’s service plan dated 4/28/21 indicated R1 needed assistance with their catheter including emptying the urine bag one time per shift and as needed if it was full, keeping the tubing clean each shift and not pulling on it to prevent injury, and to notify the charge nurse or medication technician if the catheter was leaking, or if the urine was dark in color or foul smelling. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 19, 2023 · control 29-AS-20210603143418
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not properly manage resident's personal belongings
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Teresa Camara conducted a subsequent unannounced complaint visit regarding the above noted allegation. LPA met with Administrator/Executive Director Brandy McCauley, LVN and explained the reason for the visit. On 10/6/2022, the Department received this complaint alleging the facility did not properly manage resident’s personal belongings. Specifically, the allegation was Resident 1 (R1) had a bracelet stolen from their room. LPA conducted an initial complaint visit on 10/13/2022, interviewed the administrator and reviewed records. R1’s records showed they declined to have their personal items inventoried upon admission. It was also reported R1 had private caregivers during the day who stayed with R1 in their room and took R1 on errands. (continued on 9099-C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 21, 2023 · control 29-AS-20221006144842
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are taking call pendents away from residents Staff not meeting residents incontinence needs Meals do not consist of an appropriate variety of foods
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) KaSandra Lopez conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint inspection regarding the above allegations. The LPA met with Administrator Brandy McCauley at 10:45 AM and explained the reason for the inspection. On 03/05/2021, the complaint investigation began, although due to the situation surrounding the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), and to implement mitigation measures the inspection was conducted virtually with the Administrator. During the visit, between 1:43 PM and 2:05 PM the LPA observed five residents rooms, rooms 124, 123, 103, 112, and 121 and the LPA requested pertinent records to be emailed. On 03/18/2022, the LPA conducted an in person inspection at the facility. During the inspection, the LPA conducted a physical plant tour with the Administrator beginning at 12:46 PM. Between 12:46 PM and 1:45 PM, the LPA observed four resident rooms in Assisted Living and four resident rooms in Memory Care. Report continued on LIC 9099-C. UnsubstantiCDSS inspection report, February 17, 2023 · control 29-AS-20210226084535
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not assisting resident with activities of daily living Staff fail to assist residents timely with care needs Staff are failing to turn residents as needed Facility staff are not changing the bedding for residents Facility staff speaks inappropriately to staff in front of residents in care Facility staff are not following their menu plan
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) KaSandra Lopez conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint inspection regarding the above allegations. The LPA met with Administrator Brandy McCauley at 10:45 AM and explained the reason for the inspection. On 03/05/2021, the complaint investigation began, although due to the situation surrounding the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), and to implement mitigation measures the inspection was conducted virtually with the Administrator. During the visit, between 1:43 PM and 2:05 PM the LPA observed five residents rooms, rooms 124, 123, 103, 112, and 121 and the LPA requested pertinent records to be emailed. On 03/18/2022, the LPA conducted an in person inspection at the facility for another complaint investigation (complaint controls # 29-AS-20210226084535 and 29-AS-20200624150217) and also obtained information for this complaint investigation. Report continued on LIC 9099-C. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 17, 2023 · control 29-AS-20210301124754

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 29 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
3
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
6
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
15
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
29
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →

Who runs Palms At Bonaventure Assisted Living, The?

From the CDSS ownership record, checked August 9, 2026.

Licensed to Hawthorn Al Opco Gp Llc;integral Senior Living Llc, who operates 2 licensed California homes in total. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(805) 647-0616
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Palms At Bonaventure Assisted Living, The? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.