Quail Park At Shannon Ranch is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Visalia, Tulare County, California — state license #547209004, licensed for 150 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 20 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated May 20, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

3 homes in view

Quail Park At Shannon Ranch

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 150 residents · Visalia, CA · Tulare County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #547209004, held since 2020 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
3330 & 3440 W Flagstaff Ave · Visalia, Tulare County
Phone
(559) 527-8245
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 20 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 16 residents
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
3330 WEST FLAGSTAFF WILL SERVICE TO 20 NON-AMBULATORY. 3440 WEST FLAGSTAFF WILL SERVE UP TO 130 NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 16.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 21 times and filed 20 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on May 20, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

Most recent state visit
May 20, 2026
Occupancy at that visit
116 of 150 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 9 documents with transcribed findings, dated June 11, 2022 to May 20, 2026. 9 of the 9 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unfounded” (4), “Unsubstantiated” (4). 9 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 9 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 14 of 20 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20262 state visits · 6 documents
May 20, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure residents physician reports are updated Licensee does not ensure staff are properly trained Staff do not ensure medications are dispensed as prescribed Staff do not ensure medications are properly managed and accounted for Staff do not ensure adequate care supervision is provided resulting in resident falls

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) L. Xiong conducted the complaint investigation visit to the facility. LPA met with Wellness Nurse Cynthia Fumagalli and spoke to Administrator Kim Santos on the phone and informed them the purpose of the visit. During this visit LPA delivered investigation findings regarding the above allegations.The Department has investigated the complaint alleging: Staff do not ensure residents physician reports are updated, Licensee does not ensure staff are properly trained, Staff do not ensure medications are dispensed as prescribed, Staff do not ensure medications are properly managed and accounted for, and Staff do not ensure adequate care supervision is provided resulting in resident falls. Based on the interviews conducted and/or records review the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations athe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 20, 2026 · control 24-AS-20260108093931
May 20, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 15, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff did not meet resident's oral hygiene needs while in care.

On 01/15/2025, Licensing Program Analyst's (LPA) Sarah Hurt and Shawna Doucette arrived to the facility unannounced to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA met with Facility Administrator, Kim Santos, and stated the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation Staff did not meet resident's oral hygiene needs while in care. Reporting Party stated upon further review Resident 1 lived at a different facility location. Resident 1 was not a resident at this facility. Based on the information received, we have found that the complaint is Unfounded, meaning that the allegation is false, could not have happened, and/or is without reasonable basis, therefore, we have dismissed the complaint. Nothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 15, 2026 · control 24-AS-20251025043019
Jan 15, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff stole resident’s belongings. Staff go through resident’s personal belongings. Resident’s door in disrepair. Facility elevator is in disrepair.

On 01/15/2025, Licensing Program Analyst's (LPA) Sarah Hurt and Shawna Doucette arrived to the facility unannounced to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA met with Facility Administrator, Kim Santos, and stated the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation Staff stole resident’s belongings. The reporting party stated that approximately one month after the resident moved into the facility, Resident 1 reported missing cash from their phone wallet case. Resident 1 reportedly believed they had approximately $140–$200 and later discovered only $40 remaining. The reporting party stated the resident did not leave the facility independently, did not drive, and was not visiting nearby businesses. At the time, the resident lived alone in a studio apartment (Room 227) in assisted living. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 15, 2026 · control 24-AS-20250908153035
Jan 15, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Questionable Death.

On this date, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), L. Xiong arrived unannounced to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA stated the purpose of the visit and requested to meet with the Executor Director. LPA met with Kim Santos. During this investigation, the Department conducted interviews and reviewed records. It was found that facility staff were not responsible for medication management and were not required to perform regular scheduled checks. The Department has investigated the complaint alleging: Questionable Death. We have found that the complaint was UNFOUNDED. An exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report was discussed and provided to Kim Santos. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 15, 2026 · control 24-AS-20250822154708
Jan 15, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure resident's medication is administered as prescribed Staff do not follow reporting requirements Staff did not ensure resident's showering needs are met

On 01/26/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarah Hurt arrived to the facility unannounced to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA met with Facility Administrator, Kim Santos, and stated the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation Staff did not ensure resident's medication is administered as prescribed. Resident 1's MAR documents multiple missed medications including on 09/18/25 p.m., and 09/19/2025 both a.m. and p.m. Based on records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 15, 2026 · control 24-AS-20250911082640
20253 state visits · 3 documents
Oct 8, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Facility is in disrepair.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Les Xiong conducted the complaint investigation visit to the facility. During the course of this investigation LPA reviewed facility files relevant to the complaint investigation. It was determined that the above allegation:Facility is in disrepair is UNFOUNDED. The evidence from investigation indicated there were a/c units not functioning but the facility responded timely and had the units repaired timely while portable units were provided and used during the repair. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging (Facility is in disrepair). We have found that the complaint was unfounded, therefore we have dismissed the complaint. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 8, 2025 · control 24-AS-20251001083755
Mar 28, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 7, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff handled resident in a rough manner. Facility staff inappropriately spoke to resident in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) L. Xiong conducted the complaint investigation visit to the facility. LPA met with Office Manager, Peggy Silviera and Administrator, Jeff Moyer on the phone and informed them the purpose of the visit. During this visit LPA delivered investigation findings regarding the above allegations. The Department has investigated the complaint alleging: Facility staff handled resident in a rough manner, and Facility staff inappropriately spoke to resident in care. Based on the interviews conducted and/or records review the above allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 7, 2025 · control 24-AS-20240718093610
20245 state visits · 5 documents
Jun 4, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 2, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 21, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 12, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 6, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations1typical 1
Type B citations2typical 1
Substantiated complaints3typical 2
Total complaints9typical 7
State visits on file21typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2020.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20262612025330202455020232202022340
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$3,500$5,500 /mo
our estimate — Tulare County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (559) 527-8245

Is Quail Park At Shannon Ranch licensed?

Yes — Quail Park At Shannon Ranch is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Visalia (Tulare County): California license #547209004, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 150 residents. State records list 20 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated May 20, 2026, was marked “Unsubstantiated” by the state.

Can Quail Park At Shannon Ranch care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Quail Park At Shannon Ranch with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, and hospice care; it does not list bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license record3330 WEST FLAGSTAFF WILL SERVICE TO 20 NON-AMBULATORY. 3440 WEST FLAGSTAFF WILL SERVE UP TO 130 NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 16.

How much does Quail Park At Shannon Ranch cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Quail Park At Shannon Ranch's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Tulare County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Quail Park At Shannon Ranch accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Quail Park At Shannon Ranch is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

116 of 150 beds occupied (77%) when the state visited on May 20, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Quail Park At Shannon Ranch?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 21 state visits and 20 dated documents since 2022 for Quail Park At Shannon Ranch; 9 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated May 20, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

9 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not ensure residents physician reports are updated Licensee does not ensure staff are properly trained Staff do not ensure medications are dispensed as prescribed Staff do not ensure medications are properly managed and accounted for Staff do not ensure adequate care supervision is provided resulting in resident falls
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) L. Xiong conducted the complaint investigation visit to the facility. LPA met with Wellness Nurse Cynthia Fumagalli and spoke to Administrator Kim Santos on the phone and informed them the purpose of the visit. During this visit LPA delivered investigation findings regarding the above allegations.The Department has investigated the complaint alleging: Staff do not ensure residents physician reports are updated, Licensee does not ensure staff are properly trained, Staff do not ensure medications are dispensed as prescribed, Staff do not ensure medications are properly managed and accounted for, and Staff do not ensure adequate care supervision is provided resulting in resident falls. Based on the interviews conducted and/or records review the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations aCDSS inspection report, May 20, 2026 · control 24-AS-20260108093931
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not meet resident's oral hygiene needs while in care.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On 01/15/2025, Licensing Program Analyst's (LPA) Sarah Hurt and Shawna Doucette arrived to the facility unannounced to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA met with Facility Administrator, Kim Santos, and stated the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation Staff did not meet resident's oral hygiene needs while in care. Reporting Party stated upon further review Resident 1 lived at a different facility location. Resident 1 was not a resident at this facility. Based on the information received, we have found that the complaint is Unfounded, meaning that the allegation is false, could not have happened, and/or is without reasonable basis, therefore, we have dismissed the complaint. NoCDSS inspection report, January 15, 2026 · control 24-AS-20251025043019
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff stole resident’s belongings. Staff go through resident’s personal belongings. Resident’s door in disrepair. Facility elevator is in disrepair.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 01/15/2025, Licensing Program Analyst's (LPA) Sarah Hurt and Shawna Doucette arrived to the facility unannounced to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA met with Facility Administrator, Kim Santos, and stated the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation Staff stole resident’s belongings. The reporting party stated that approximately one month after the resident moved into the facility, Resident 1 reported missing cash from their phone wallet case. Resident 1 reportedly believed they had approximately $140–$200 and later discovered only $40 remaining. The reporting party stated the resident did not leave the facility independently, did not drive, and was not visiting nearby businesses. At the time, the resident lived alone in a studio apartment (Room 227) in assisted living. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 15, 2026 · control 24-AS-20250908153035
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedQuestionable Death.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On this date, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), L. Xiong arrived unannounced to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA stated the purpose of the visit and requested to meet with the Executor Director. LPA met with Kim Santos. During this investigation, the Department conducted interviews and reviewed records. It was found that facility staff were not responsible for medication management and were not required to perform regular scheduled checks. The Department has investigated the complaint alleging: Questionable Death. We have found that the complaint was UNFOUNDED. An exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report was discussed and provided to Kim Santos. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, January 15, 2026 · control 24-AS-20250822154708
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure resident's medication is administered as prescribed Staff do not follow reporting requirements Staff did not ensure resident's showering needs are met
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 01/26/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarah Hurt arrived to the facility unannounced to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA met with Facility Administrator, Kim Santos, and stated the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation Staff did not ensure resident's medication is administered as prescribed. Resident 1's MAR documents multiple missed medications including on 09/18/25 p.m., and 09/19/2025 both a.m. and p.m. Based on records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 15, 2026 · control 24-AS-20250911082640

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is in disrepair.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Les Xiong conducted the complaint investigation visit to the facility. During the course of this investigation LPA reviewed facility files relevant to the complaint investigation. It was determined that the above allegation:Facility is in disrepair is UNFOUNDED. The evidence from investigation indicated there were a/c units not functioning but the facility responded timely and had the units repaired timely while portable units were provided and used during the repair. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging (Facility is in disrepair). We have found that the complaint was unfounded, therefore we have dismissed the complaint. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, October 8, 2025 · control 24-AS-20251001083755
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff handled resident in a rough manner. Facility staff inappropriately spoke to resident in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) L. Xiong conducted the complaint investigation visit to the facility. LPA met with Office Manager, Peggy Silviera and Administrator, Jeff Moyer on the phone and informed them the purpose of the visit. During this visit LPA delivered investigation findings regarding the above allegations. The Department has investigated the complaint alleging: Facility staff handled resident in a rough manner, and Facility staff inappropriately spoke to resident in care. Based on the interviews conducted and/or records review the above allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 7, 2025 · control 24-AS-20240718093610

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained multiple injuries while in care Staff do not use a hoyer lift for resident in care Medication not dispensed at scheduled time Staff do not following doctor's orders Unqualified or untrained staff providing care Staff make residents get up at early hours of the morning.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Shawna Doucette conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings. LPA met with Administrator Jeff Moyer and discussed the purpose of the visit. The Department has investigated the allegations: Resident sustained multiple injuries while in care, Staff do not use a hoyer lift for resident in care, Medication not dispensed at scheduled time, Staff do not following doctor's orders, Unqualified or untrained staff providing care and Staff make residents get up at early hours of the morning. Based on record review and interviews, R1did fall however facility followed proper procedures and sought medical attention for R1. Based on records review and interviews, R1 did not have prescription for a hoyer lift and could get up with assistance from facility staff. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 5, 2022 · control 24-AS-20220606101550
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility air conditioner is in disrepair
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Shawna Doucette contacted the facility to commence a complaint investigation. LPA conducted a visit and took COVID-19 pre-cautionary measures. LPA identified herself and was met by Staff Deborah Nungaray. LPA explained the purpose of the visit with Executive Chef Miguel Lopez. LPA contacted Administrator Jeff Moyer via phone who advised Executive Chef Miguel would assist with the visit. LPA toured the facility and took photos of the thermostats on the first and second floor of the facility. LPA interviewed staff. Although there was an issue with the air conditioner the facility had the issue fixed and provided cooling units for the rooms to assist with cooling. LPA was at the facility on 6/7/22 and found the termperature to be comfortable in the facility. Based on interviews, this agency has investigated the complaint alleging Facility air conditioner is in disrepair. We have found that the complaint was UNFOUNDED, therefore we have dismissed the complaCDSS inspection report, June 11, 2022 · control 24-AS-20220610091929

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 21 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
1
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
2
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
3
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
9
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
21
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(559) 527-8245
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Quail Park At Shannon Ranch? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.