Oakmont Gardens is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Santa Rosa, Sonoma County, California — state license #496803998, licensed for 79 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 35 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated June 11, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

2 homes in view

Oakmont Gardens

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 79 residents · Santa Rosa, CA · Sonoma County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceBedriddenMemory care not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #496803998, held since 2022 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
301 White Oak Drive · Santa Rosa, Sonoma County
Phone
(707) 538-1914
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 79 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careVerified in record
Bedridden careApproved for 10 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER; APPROVED FOR CAPACITY OF 79 NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH 10 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN; HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 8 RESIDENTSState service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 38 times and filed 35 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated June 11, 2026.

Most recent state visit
June 11, 2026
Occupancy at the July 17, 2025 visit
61 of 79 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 11 documents with transcribed findings, dated July 19, 2022 to July 17, 2025. 11 of the 11 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (3), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (7). 11 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 11 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 22 of 35 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20263 state visits · 3 documents
Jun 11, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 10, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 19, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20257 state visits · 9 documents
Dec 11, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 4, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 17, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not respond to resident's request for assistance in a timely manner.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christi Coppo arrived at this facility unannounced, to open an investigation into the above allegations. Complaint alleges staff did not respond to resident's request for assistance in a timely manner. Complainant states that resident (R1) waited for more than thirty [30] minutes after pushing their pendant before staff responded to pendant call. During investigation, LPA reviewed facility's pendant call log. Call log review shows that on 7/1/25 R1 waited 17 minutes after pressing their pendant before receiveing assistance, on 7/4/25 they waited 33 minutes, in the afternoon on 7/6/25 they waited 19.5 minutes, and in the evening on 7/6/25 they waited 15 minutes. During investigation, LPA reviewed facility's call light/pendant procedure policy. Policy states that all pendant calls will be answered promptly. Policy further states that "promptness is essential, as a resident may be alone and in an emergency situation." Continued on 9099C... Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 17, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250714151540
Jul 17, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 10, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility water turned off, resulting in residents not provided drinking water or water for toilets and bathing

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christi Coppo arrived at this facility unannounced, to open an investigation into the above allegations. Complaint alleges facility water was turned off, resulting in residents not provided drinking water or water for toilets and bathing. On 5/12/25 LPA was notified that a water pipe at the facility had broken and the water was shut off as of Sunday 5/11/25 from 11:00am onward and was attempted to be repaired. Facility turned the water back on Monday 5/12/25 at 10:30am, but the repair fix did not work and the repair burst. So, the water was again shut off for the entire facility. Facility did not notify CCL of water being shut off. On 5/12/25, upon learning of the incident, LPA immediately contacted facility Administrator Mark Strohschein to inquire as to status of water at facility and if they had engaged their Emergency Disaster Plan. On 5/12/25 at 2:38pm Admin responded to LPA, confirming the water had been turned off due to a Continued on 9099C... Suthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 10, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250604125611
Jun 10, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 13, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 7, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 14, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20246 state visits · 6 documents
Nov 7, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility not maintained in safe condition for residents

At approximately 12:45PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christi Coppo arrived at this facility unannounced, to deliver finding for above allegation. LPA met with Administrator Morgan Holien. Complaint alleges facility not maintained in safe condition for residents. Complainant states that the sidewalk concrete on the corner of the west entrance by WellsFargo is cracked and raised, presenting a safety hazard for residents. Complaintant states that the sidewalk concrete behind apartments #124-126 is also cracked and raised, presenting a safety hazard for residents. Complainant states that repairs to these areas have not been completed because the facility does not have enough money in their budget to fix them. During investigation, LPA contacted the City of Santa Rosa Public Works Department to determine the party responsible for the repairs, LPA was advised that private property owners are responsible for sidewalk repairs Continued on 9099C... Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 7, 2024 · control 21-AS-20241031093432
Aug 9, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 9, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 1, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 18, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 11, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20233 state visits · 4 documents
Dec 19, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff mismanaged residents medication Staff did not seek medical attention in a timely manner

Licensing Program Analyst Leibert arrives unannounced for the purpose of delivering findings on this complaint. Complainant alleges that staff made errors regarding resident's (R1) medications and that R1 was not provided timely medical attention following a fall on 10/31/2023. Through investigative interviews and review of pertinent documents, the following determinations are made: The specific medications and dates of alleged errors were not reported to CCL; Health Services Director states that any medications not given were due to R1's absence from the facility; Facility reports that R1 initially indicated a lack of pain and declined medical treatment following R1's fall; Staff reportedly checked R1 daily for changes in gait and pain; R1 was sent out for medical treatment on day three when R1 reported pain and requested treatment; Facility's Report of Injury (LIC624) conforms with staff statements regarding the accident. Although allegations may be true, based upon the statements mathe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 19, 2023 · control 21-AS-20231113084830
Dec 12, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not respond to a resident's call button in a timely manner

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christi Coppo and Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Victoria Bertozzi arrived unannounced to conduct a complaint investigation. Staff did not respond to a resident's call button in a timely manner - Complaint alleges that resident fell and pushed thier call button for assistance but a caregiver did not respond in a timely manner. Per LPA review of call button log, there was at least one incident where there was a 94 minute delay following a resident fall. LPA and facility staff discussed areas of concern regarding the call button system and LPA will continue to work with facility to ensure resident safety. Based on record review(s), the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22, Division & Chapter number), are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Failure to correct the deficiency and/or repeat deficiencies within a 12 month period may resultthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 12, 2023 · control 21-AS-20231206151404
Dec 12, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 3, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations6typical 1
Type B citations2typical 1
Substantiated complaints9typical 2
Total complaints13typical 7
State visits on file38typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2022.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202633020257922024660202361012022670
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$6,000$9,000 /mo
our estimate — Sonoma County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2025 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (707) 538-1914

Is Oakmont Gardens licensed?

Yes — Oakmont Gardens is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Santa Rosa (Sonoma County): California license #496803998, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 79 residents. State records list 35 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated June 11, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Oakmont Gardens care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Oakmont Gardens with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER; APPROVED FOR CAPACITY OF 79 NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH 10 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN; HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 8 RESIDENTS

How much does Oakmont Gardens cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Oakmont Gardens's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Sonoma County typically runs $6,000–$9,000/mo and small board-and-care homes $5,000–$8,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Oakmont Gardens accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Oakmont Gardens is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

61 of 79 beds occupied (77%) when the state visited on July 17, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Oakmont Gardens?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 38 state visits and 35 dated documents since 2022 for Oakmont Gardens; 11 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated July 17, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

11 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not respond to resident's request for assistance in a timely manner.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christi Coppo arrived at this facility unannounced, to open an investigation into the above allegations. Complaint alleges staff did not respond to resident's request for assistance in a timely manner. Complainant states that resident (R1) waited for more than thirty [30] minutes after pushing their pendant before staff responded to pendant call. During investigation, LPA reviewed facility's pendant call log. Call log review shows that on 7/1/25 R1 waited 17 minutes after pressing their pendant before receiveing assistance, on 7/4/25 they waited 33 minutes, in the afternoon on 7/6/25 they waited 19.5 minutes, and in the evening on 7/6/25 they waited 15 minutes. During investigation, LPA reviewed facility's call light/pendant procedure policy. Policy states that all pendant calls will be answered promptly. Policy further states that "promptness is essential, as a resident may be alone and in an emergency situation." Continued on 9099C... SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 17, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250714151540
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility water turned off, resulting in residents not provided drinking water or water for toilets and bathing
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christi Coppo arrived at this facility unannounced, to open an investigation into the above allegations. Complaint alleges facility water was turned off, resulting in residents not provided drinking water or water for toilets and bathing. On 5/12/25 LPA was notified that a water pipe at the facility had broken and the water was shut off as of Sunday 5/11/25 from 11:00am onward and was attempted to be repaired. Facility turned the water back on Monday 5/12/25 at 10:30am, but the repair fix did not work and the repair burst. So, the water was again shut off for the entire facility. Facility did not notify CCL of water being shut off. On 5/12/25, upon learning of the incident, LPA immediately contacted facility Administrator Mark Strohschein to inquire as to status of water at facility and if they had engaged their Emergency Disaster Plan. On 5/12/25 at 2:38pm Admin responded to LPA, confirming the water had been turned off due to a Continued on 9099C... SuCDSS inspection report, June 10, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250604125611

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility not maintained in safe condition for residents
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
At approximately 12:45PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christi Coppo arrived at this facility unannounced, to deliver finding for above allegation. LPA met with Administrator Morgan Holien. Complaint alleges facility not maintained in safe condition for residents. Complainant states that the sidewalk concrete on the corner of the west entrance by WellsFargo is cracked and raised, presenting a safety hazard for residents. Complaintant states that the sidewalk concrete behind apartments #124-126 is also cracked and raised, presenting a safety hazard for residents. Complainant states that repairs to these areas have not been completed because the facility does not have enough money in their budget to fix them. During investigation, LPA contacted the City of Santa Rosa Public Works Department to determine the party responsible for the repairs, LPA was advised that private property owners are responsible for sidewalk repairs Continued on 9099C... UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, November 7, 2024 · control 21-AS-20241031093432

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff mismanaged residents medication Staff did not seek medical attention in a timely manner
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst Leibert arrives unannounced for the purpose of delivering findings on this complaint. Complainant alleges that staff made errors regarding resident's (R1) medications and that R1 was not provided timely medical attention following a fall on 10/31/2023. Through investigative interviews and review of pertinent documents, the following determinations are made: The specific medications and dates of alleged errors were not reported to CCL; Health Services Director states that any medications not given were due to R1's absence from the facility; Facility reports that R1 initially indicated a lack of pain and declined medical treatment following R1's fall; Staff reportedly checked R1 daily for changes in gait and pain; R1 was sent out for medical treatment on day three when R1 reported pain and requested treatment; Facility's Report of Injury (LIC624) conforms with staff statements regarding the accident. Although allegations may be true, based upon the statements maCDSS inspection report, December 19, 2023 · control 21-AS-20231113084830
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not respond to a resident's call button in a timely manner
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christi Coppo and Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Victoria Bertozzi arrived unannounced to conduct a complaint investigation. Staff did not respond to a resident's call button in a timely manner - Complaint alleges that resident fell and pushed thier call button for assistance but a caregiver did not respond in a timely manner. Per LPA review of call button log, there was at least one incident where there was a 94 minute delay following a resident fall. LPA and facility staff discussed areas of concern regarding the call button system and LPA will continue to work with facility to ensure resident safety. Based on record review(s), the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22, Division & Chapter number), are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Failure to correct the deficiency and/or repeat deficiencies within a 12 month period may resultCDSS inspection report, December 12, 2023 · control 21-AS-20231206151404
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff left resident in soiled clothing for a prolonged period of time Facility staff do not properly assist resident with toileting needs Facility staff did not ensure the resident's call buttons were within reach of the resident Facility staff did not reposition resident in a timely manner
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Farhaan Sarangi arrived unannounced at Oakmont Gardens for the purpose of delivering complaint findings. LPA was greeted by Administrator, Morgan Holien, and was granted access into the facility. During the course of the investigation, LPA reviewed resident(s) records, facility records, interviewed staff, residents and outside agency staff. Complaint alleges Facility staff left resident in soiled clothing for a prolonged period of time and Facility staff do not properly assist resident with toileting needs. Based on interviews that were conducted, LPA could not prove or disprove the allegations. Furthermore, while interviewing a random sample of residents in care, LPA learned of no concerns with the care that the facility provides. On July 26, 2023 and July 27, 2023, LPA interviewed an outside agency which yielded inconsistent statements as it relates to the allegations in question. (Report continued on LIC 9099C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 31, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230519161049
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not ensure that passageways are kept free of obstruction
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Farhaan Sarangi arrived unannounced at Oakmont Gardens for the purpose of touring Resident #1's room and delivering complaint findings. LPA was greeted at the door by Administrator, Morgan Holien and was granted access into the facility. During the course of the investigation, LPA conducted a tour of the facility on July 6, 2023, made observations, interviewed Resident #1 and Administrator. Complaint alleges that facility staff did not ensure that passageways are kept free from obstruction. Based on interviews that were conducted, LPA was made aware that a new ramp was on order and was installed recently. During the tour of Resident #1's room conducted on July 6, 2023, LPA observed a ramp for entrance and exit to the patio. LPA learned that Resident #1 was content with the ramp and the placement of the ramp. (Report continued on LIC 9099C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 6, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230525101426
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff does not ensure residents are accorded dignity in their personal relationships Resident are left in soiled clothing for extended periods of time Staff refuses to provide assistance to resident in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
"AMENDED" This is an amended version of the original report created on July 6, 2023-SEE BELOW. Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Farhaan Sarangi arrived unannounced at Oakmont Gardens for the purpose of touring the facility and delivering complaint findings. LPA was greeted at the door by Administrator, Morgan Holien and was granted access into the facility. During the course of the investigation, LPA conducted a tour of the facility on July 6, 2023, made observations, interviewed staff and residents. Complaint alleges that Staff do not ensure residents are accorded dignity in their personal relationships. Based on interviews that were conducted with residents and staff, LPA could not prove or disprove the allegation. Furthermore, LPA was not made aware of any concerns during interviewing additional residents in care. During a tour of the facility conducted on July 6, 2023, LPA observed residents performing activities with one another. (Report continued on LIC 9099C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 6, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230614163014
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is not folowing specialized diets. Facility does not ensure there is a designated substitute on duty at all times qualified to act in the absence of the administrator. Facility did not give resident medication according to physicians orders. Facility does not have an effective emergency plan
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst Cuadra arrived unannounced to conduct a complaint investigation and deliver findings regarding the above allegations and met with Executive Director Morgan Holien. It was alleged that the facility is not following specialized diets. Per Reporting Party, the facility indicates residents with low sodium diet to bring their own food to the chef for them to cook it. Based on records review, the facility provided weekly menus for the month of October 2022 including an option called “Anytime Dining” offering residents in care a variety of food options. LPA conducted interviews with Executive Director who provided continuous meeting notes starting on May 25, 2022 indicating that resident (R1), facility chef, Health Services Director, Long Term Ombudsman were present addressing food options available for R1 who has a low sodium special diet in their Physician’s report dated March 1, 2022. LPA learned based on information obtained from confidential interviews that R1 wCDSS inspection report, January 20, 2023 · control 21-AS-20221012111855

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 38 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
6
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
2
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
9
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
13
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
38
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(707) 538-1914
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Oakmont Gardens? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.