Vine Ridge Senior Living is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Cloverdale, Sonoma County, California — state license #496803825, licensed for 99 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 34 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated July 9, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

2 homes in view

Vine Ridge Senior Living

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 99 residents · Cloverdale, CA · Sonoma County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #496803825, held since 2019 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
247 Treadway Drive · Cloverdale, Sonoma County
Phone
(707) 791-4787
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryVerified in record
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 8 residents
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
ALL AMBULATORY IN SECOND FLOOR ASSISTED LIVING,ALL BEDRIDDEN FIRST FLOOR MEMORY CARE ONLY. ALL NON-AMBULATORY IN BOTH FLOORS. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR EIGHT (8).State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 47 times and filed 34 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated July 9, 2026.

Most recent state visit
July 9, 2026
Occupancy at the September 10, 2024 visit
24 of 99 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 14 documents with transcribed findings, dated September 16, 2021 to September 10, 2024. 14 of the 14 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (7), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (6). 14 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 14 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 16 of 34 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20266 state visits · 7 documents
Jul 9, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 30, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 15, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 12, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 4, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 29, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 29, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20253 state visits · 3 documents
Nov 7, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 31, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 5, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20243 state visits · 4 documents
Oct 28, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 10, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: -Resident sustained an injury while in care. -Staff do not ensure adequate care and supervision is provided to residents. -Staff leave residents in soiled clothing for extended periods of time. -Staff do not ensure a safe environment is provided for clients in care. -Staff do not ensure safe transfer methods are used for residents in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cuadra arrived unannounced to conduct a complaint investigation and deliver findings regarding the above allegations and met with acting Administrator, Carla Lua. Resident sustained an injury while in care. Per Reporting party, staff would leave spills on the floor, causing residents to slip and fall in the facility. The Reporting party stated that three weeks ago a resident (R1) had a bad fall in the bathroom due to one of the staff leaving them in the bathroom alone. R1 lost their balance and hit their head. The Reporting party acknowledged that medical treatment was provided immediately, and the resident was taken to the emergency room. Based on records review, on 6/24/24 the facility submitted an incident report notifying to the Department that on 6/20/24 at approximate 2pm, R1 had an unwitnessed fall and injury. Per incident report, staff found R1 on the restroom floor, they have notified 911 immediately and R1’s responsible party, R1 was transportethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 10, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240710150350
Jul 11, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: -Facility did not have a certified administrator. -Staff are not properly trained .

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cuadra arrived unannounced to conduct a complaint investigation and deliver findings regarding the above allegations and met with acting administrator Carla Lua. An allegation was received by the Department regarding facility did not have a certified administrator. Per Reporting Party, acting administrator was hired in December 2023 as the facility administrator and admitted to reporting party of not having an administrator certificate. The reporting party states acting administrator began taking their administrator classes earlier this year and is not sure if they have applied for the certificate. Based on records review, prior administrator has resigned in December 2023, new administrator’s first date was March 17, 2024. Although, the acting administrator do not have a current administrator certificate and is currently in the administrator certification section pending review list of the Department as of March 28, 2024, and application was received onthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 11, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240507093626
Jul 11, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20232 state visits · 2 documents
Oct 12, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 5, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure needs were reassessed for resident in care Facility overcharged resident for care services

At approximately 8:00AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced, to deliver findings from a complaint investigation conducted by the Department. LPA met with Executive Director Angie Smith. Complaint alleges that the facility overcharged a resident for services that they did not require because resident was not reassessed once facility staff observed resident’s care needs. Per review of Physician’s Report dated 7/8/2022, resident was unable to bathe, dress, toilet or groom themselves without assistance, was unable to manage their own medication or cash resources and was bedridden. Review of Admission Agreement Addendum A dated, 7/22/2022 outlines that resident would be charged for a Memory Care room and a level of care II. On 8/1/2022, an updated Addendum A was created, though not signed, indicating that resident would be... Continued on LIC 9099-C. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 5, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230703100544
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations7typical 1
Type B citations8typical 1
Substantiated complaints17typical 2
Total complaints18typical 7
State visits on file47typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2019.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026670202533020243402023332202281142021461
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$6,000$9,000 /mo
our estimate — Sonoma County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home is on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (707) 791-4787

Is Vine Ridge Senior Living licensed?

Yes — Vine Ridge Senior Living is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Cloverdale (Sonoma County): California license #496803825, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 99 residents. State records list 34 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated July 9, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Vine Ridge Senior Living care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Vine Ridge Senior Living with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, and hospice care; it does not list bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordALL AMBULATORY IN SECOND FLOOR ASSISTED LIVING,ALL BEDRIDDEN FIRST FLOOR MEMORY CARE ONLY. ALL NON-AMBULATORY IN BOTH FLOORS. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR EIGHT (8).

How much does Vine Ridge Senior Living cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Vine Ridge Senior Living's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Sonoma County typically runs $6,000–$9,000/mo and small board-and-care homes $5,000–$8,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Vine Ridge Senior Living accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Vine Ridge Senior Living through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.

Medi-Cal / ALW homes in Sonoma County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

24 of 99 beds occupied (24%) when the state visited on September 10, 2024. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Vine Ridge Senior Living?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 47 state visits and 34 dated documents since 2021 for Vine Ridge Senior Living; 14 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated September 10, 2024, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

14 transcribed reports on file

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed-Resident sustained an injury while in care. -Staff do not ensure adequate care and supervision is provided to residents. -Staff leave residents in soiled clothing for extended periods of time. -Staff do not ensure a safe environment is provided for clients in care. -Staff do not ensure safe transfer methods are used for residents in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cuadra arrived unannounced to conduct a complaint investigation and deliver findings regarding the above allegations and met with acting Administrator, Carla Lua. Resident sustained an injury while in care. Per Reporting party, staff would leave spills on the floor, causing residents to slip and fall in the facility. The Reporting party stated that three weeks ago a resident (R1) had a bad fall in the bathroom due to one of the staff leaving them in the bathroom alone. R1 lost their balance and hit their head. The Reporting party acknowledged that medical treatment was provided immediately, and the resident was taken to the emergency room. Based on records review, on 6/24/24 the facility submitted an incident report notifying to the Department that on 6/20/24 at approximate 2pm, R1 had an unwitnessed fall and injury. Per incident report, staff found R1 on the restroom floor, they have notified 911 immediately and R1’s responsible party, R1 was transporteCDSS inspection report, September 10, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240710150350
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed-Facility did not have a certified administrator. -Staff are not properly trained .
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cuadra arrived unannounced to conduct a complaint investigation and deliver findings regarding the above allegations and met with acting administrator Carla Lua. An allegation was received by the Department regarding facility did not have a certified administrator. Per Reporting Party, acting administrator was hired in December 2023 as the facility administrator and admitted to reporting party of not having an administrator certificate. The reporting party states acting administrator began taking their administrator classes earlier this year and is not sure if they have applied for the certificate. Based on records review, prior administrator has resigned in December 2023, new administrator’s first date was March 17, 2024. Although, the acting administrator do not have a current administrator certificate and is currently in the administrator certification section pending review list of the Department as of March 28, 2024, and application was received onCDSS inspection report, July 11, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240507093626

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure needs were reassessed for resident in care Facility overcharged resident for care services
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
At approximately 8:00AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility unannounced, to deliver findings from a complaint investigation conducted by the Department. LPA met with Executive Director Angie Smith. Complaint alleges that the facility overcharged a resident for services that they did not require because resident was not reassessed once facility staff observed resident’s care needs. Per review of Physician’s Report dated 7/8/2022, resident was unable to bathe, dress, toilet or groom themselves without assistance, was unable to manage their own medication or cash resources and was bedridden. Review of Admission Agreement Addendum A dated, 7/22/2022 outlines that resident would be charged for a Memory Care room and a level of care II. On 8/1/2022, an updated Addendum A was created, though not signed, indicating that resident would be... Continued on LIC 9099-C. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 5, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230703100544
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is not following Covid protocols
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst Bertozzi arrived unannounced to conduct a complaint investigation regarding the above complaint allegation and met with Administrator, Angie Smith. During visit LPA made observations, reviewed documents and conducted interviews. Facility is not following Covid protocols - Complaint alleges that facility staff are not wearing masks while in the facility. During this visit, LPA observed two of seven staff who did not have a mask on. LPA discussed observations with the Administrator who stated they would discuss with staff to ensure they are wearing masks. The allegation that facility is not following Covid protocols is Substantiated. A finding that the complaint is substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met.CDSS inspection report, January 17, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230113121330

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility removed resident's personal belongings without consent Facility did not allow entry to resident's visitor
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst Bertozzi arrived unanounced to deliver findings regarding the above-mentioned allegations and met with Licensee, Larona Farnum and Administrator, Angie Smith. Facility removed resident's personal belongings without consent – Complaint alleges that someone came into a resident’s room and stole items from their room without asking permission or allowing the resident to be present. Missing items were described as food and drinks from the resident’s refrigerator and from a shelf next to the refrigerator. Staff interviews indicate that staff came into a resident’s room after reports that the room was not safe and sanitary. Per interviews, multiple trays were observed with food that were moldy, so trays and food were removed by staff. Review of the facility’s Admission Agreement states that for the safety and comfort of the resident, staff must be permitted to enter an apartment to perform basic personal and housekeeping services, respond to emergencies and make repCDSS inspection report, October 11, 2022 · control 21-AS-20220922095430
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedInsufficient Staffing Resident needs are not being met
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst Willis arrived unannounced to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegations and met with Administrator, Rachael Lanham. During investigation LPA conducted interviews, made observations and reviewed records. Insufficient Staffing - Complaint alleges that facility has insufficient staffing to meet the needs of the residents. Review of the LIC500 showed that at least one Sunday had one caregiver and one Medication Technician scheduled for Memory Care and Assisted Living. Per interviews and review of schedules, staffing shortages have resulted in the Administrator having to cover caregiving duties, staff being scheduled for double shifts and some shifts having one caregiver and one Medication Technician responsible for activities of daily living for more than 20 residents which includes Memory Care residents who require more supervision. Continued on LIC9099C SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 30, 2022 · control 21-AS-20220816100641
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility retaliated agiainst whistleblower
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst Willis arrived unannouned to conduct an investigation regarding the above complaint allegation and met with Administrator, Rachael Lanham. Complaint alleges that the facility retaliated against a whisteblower by terminating their employment. Interview with facility staff alleges that three employees chose to terminate their employment by "walking off the job". LPA conducted additional interviews but was unable to confirm that a person was terminated because they were thought to be a whistleblower. A finding that the complaint allegation that facility retaliated agiainst whistleblower was unsubstantiated meaning that although the allegation may have happened there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the allegation occurred. NoCDSS inspection report, August 30, 2022 · control 21-AS-20220822142153
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not follow their Covid Mitigation Plan Facility is not safe, sanitary and in good repair
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst Willis arrived unannounced to conduct an investigation regarding the above mentioned complaint allegations and met with Administrator, Rachael Lanham. Licensee, Larona Farnum was available by phone. LPA made observations, conducted interviews and reviewed files. Facility did not follow their Covid Mitigation Plan - Complaint alleges that facility had Covid + residents and staff in July 2022 and did not notify residents and their responsible parties. LPA confirmed through interviews that two residents and three staff tested positive for Covid in July 2022 and not all responsible parties or the Department of Public Health were notified. Interview also confirmed that facility did not test all staff and residents once there were confirmed positive staff and residents in the facility. Review of Special Incident Reports confirm that Community Care Licensing was not notified either. Continued on LIC9099C SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 19, 2022 · control 21-AS-20220816100641
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility failed to ensure resident's personal rights
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Manager Willis arrived unannounced to deliver findings regarding the above mentioned complaint allegations and met with Administrator, Licensee, Larona Farnum and Acting Administrator, Rachael Lanham. During investigation LPA conducted interviews, reviewed documents and made observations. Facility failed to ensure resident's personal rights – Complaint alleges that a resident takes the clothes of other residents and wears them, and another resident lays down in other resident’s beds. Additionally, complaint alleges that resident hits other residents and staff. Three of four staff interviews identified two residents who go into other residents’ rooms and confirmed instances of resident’s taking other resident’s clothes and laying in other resident’s beds. Two of four interviewed staff indicated that they have observed resident, R1 hit other residents. Continued on LIC9099C SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, June 23, 2022 · control 21-AS-20220503151514
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility Administrator is not qualified due to not having an administrator certificate
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst Willis arrived unannounced to conduct a complaint investigation regarding the above mentioned complaint allegation and met with Licensee, Larona Farnum and Acting Administrator, Rachael Lanham. Complaint alleges that the facility does not have a certified administrator. Administrator, David Uballez has recently left this facility to work in another facility owned by the Licensee. Licensee is currently completing the Change of Administrator paperwork for the current Acting Administrator, Rachael Lanham who is currently working full time at the facility. Licensee is also working in the facility two days per week to assist in the transition. Acting Administrator and Licensee have active Administrator Certificates. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging that facility Administrator is not qualified due to not having an administrator certificate. We have found that the complaint was unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happenCDSS inspection report, May 4, 2022 · control 21-AS-20220425130618
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedInsufficient Staffing
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst Willis arrive unannounced to deliver findings regarding the above-mentioned compliant allegations and met with Acting Administrator, Lisa DiBartolo. Insufficient Staffing – Complaint alleges that staff is not sufficient enough to provide for resident’s care needs. Interviews indicated that one resident waited 45 minutes for staff assistance with getting dressed and another indicated that sometimes they do not get their shower timely as the facility is short staffed. Review of files revealed that at least twice per week there is one staff on the overnight shift for both Assisted Living and Memory Care. The allegation of Insufficient Staffing is Substantiated. A finding that the complaint is substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met.CDSS inspection report, March 11, 2022 · control 21-AS-20220127123704

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 47 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
7
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
8
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
17
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
18
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
47
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(707) 791-4787
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Vine Ridge Senior Living? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.