Cogir Of North Bay is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Vallejo, Solano County, California — state license #486803810, with a licensed capacity of 83, listed as closed, change of ownership in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 15 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated February 9, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

163 homes in view

Cogir Of North Bay

The state record lists this licence as “Closed, Change of Ownership”. A closed licence cannot admit residents. We keep closed licences published because “is this place licensed?” deserves an honest answer.

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 83 residents · Vallejo, CA · Solano County
Closed in state recordWheelchairHospiceMemory care not on fileBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days · we confirm by phone before any referral
License #486803810, held since 2019 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
2261 Tuolumne St · Vallejo, Solano County
Phone
(707) 552-3336
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 55 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 7 residents
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 28 AMBULATORY & 55 NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 7State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 15 times and filed 15 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated February 9, 2026.

Most recent state visit
February 9, 2026
Occupancy at the December 8, 2025 visit
54 of 83 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 8 documents with transcribed findings, dated March 21, 2022 to December 8, 2025. 8 of the 8 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (7). 8 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 8 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 8 of 15 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20261 state visit · 1 document
Feb 9, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20253 state visits · 3 documents
Dec 8, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee not meeting care needs

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Magdaleno arrived unnanounced to continue a complaint investigation and deliver findings regarding the above allegation(s) and met with Administrator Davina Barker. Licensee not meeting care needs – Reporting Party (RP) alleges that facility does not maintain residents room leaving sanitation and fall hazards as well as medication mismanagement. During the course of this investigation LPA reviewed records, made observations, and conducted interviews. Review of Housekeeping Guidelines indicated standard tasks that are expected to be completed by housekeeping. Review of Housekeeping Checklist indicated housekeeping signing off and informing residents of completed cleaning. Review of the assigned task sheet indicated all tasks assigned to specific housekeepers including additional requests or comments from residents. Review of Resident Housekeeping Declination form indicated that residents are able to decline housekeeping services. Review of resident LIC602the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 8, 2025 · control 21-AS-20251028103450
Mar 19, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility failed to safeguard residents belongings

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) A. Canela arrived unannounced for the purpose of gathering more information and delivering findings regarding the above allegation and met with Executive Director/Administrator, Tracy Freudendahl (S1). LPA previously toured the facility, resident (R1) room, toured parking lot, took statements and requested records. It was alleged the facility failed to safeguard residents belongings, when R1 was in the hospital. It was alleged R1s car had been driven and parked in another area and that there were things, including R1's checkbook and keys that were missing from the apartment. LPA toured the area and R1s vehicle was previously located in the front entrance parking lot. S1 had expressed that the car had been there for several months and it has not been moved since R1 left it there. LPA observed the vehicle appeared to have a low tire and observed there were several spider cobwebs around some tires, indicating the vehicle had been there and not moved for anthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 19, 2025 · control 21-AS-20241121135902
Feb 14, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20243 state visits · 3 documents
Dec 16, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Personal Rights

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) A. Canela arrived unannounced for the purpose of continuing complaint investigation and was greeted by Executive Director/Administrator, Tracy Freudendahl. LPA took additional statements and requested records. It was alleged the personal rights of a resident were violated due to a lack of communication by facility staff. Resident R2 was ready to return to the facility after a hospital emergency visit and it was reported Hospital staff made several calls to the facility explaining R2 was ready to be discharged but they were not able to speak with Health Wellness director to coordinate discharge and were just allowed to leave messages by the front staff. It was reported R2 was admitted to the hospital on 8/9/2024 and on 8/13 hospital was trying to discharge R2, but was not able to discharge until 8/15. Continue report see LIC9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 16, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240816133812
Aug 21, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure that residents are served foods of good quality Staff did not ensure that the facility is maintained in good repair

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) A. Canela arrived unannounced for the purpose of continuing complaint investigation regarding the above allegations and met with Executive Director/Administrator, Tracy Freudendahl. This investigation included site visits to the facility; statements taken and LPA observations. It has been alleged facility staff do not ensure that residents are served foods of good quality, in that foods are served burned or cold. LPA took several statements from residents and no one corroborated the allegation. Residents expressed they like the food and have never had an issue with food being burned or cold. It was also alleged staff did not ensure the facility is maintained in good repair in that the outside smoking area gazebo tent is torn to shreds and water fountains are not operational. LPA observed the tent is in perfect condition. Facility staff expressed it was replaced about a month and a half ago due to needing a new cover but it was never in shreds. LPA observthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 21, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240620122804
Jan 12, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20231 state visit · 1 document
Oct 30, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Residents needs are not being met by facility

Licensing Program Analyst Leibert arrives unannounced for the purpose of delivering findings on this complaint. This investigation included site visits to the facility; statements taken from witnesses and parties; as well as review of documents obtained during the course of the investigation. It has been alleged that the facility has not met R1's needs in that R1 has missed medical appointments; has not set up R1's voice mail; and does not wear a durable medical device prescribed following surgery because staff do not assist R1. The following determinations are made: R1 lives relatively independently with occasional transportation provided by the facility and has not contracted with the facility for additional care; R1's care plan and physician's assessment indicate R1 does not need assistance with activities of daily living; R1's states that R1 has chosen to not attend appointments or wear the medical device on occasions in the recent past. Although the allegation may be true, based othe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 30, 2023 · control 21-AS-20231019125734
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations1typical 1
Type B citations0typical 1
Substantiated complaints1typical 2
Total complaints8typical 7
State visits on file15typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2019.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20261102025330202433020234512022330
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Solano County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one.
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →

Is Cogir Of North Bay licensed?

No — not currently. The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists Cogir Of North Bay in Vallejo (Solano County), California license #486803810, as “Closed, Change Of Ownership, formerly licensed for 83 residents. State records list 15 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated February 9, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Cogir Of North Bay care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Cogir Of North Bay with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and hospice care; it does not list dementia / memory care and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 28 AMBULATORY & 55 NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 7

How much does Cogir Of North Bay cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Cogir Of North Bay's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Solano County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Cogir Of North Bay accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Cogir Of North Bay is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

54 of 83 beds occupied (65%) when the state visited on December 8, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Cogir Of North Bay?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 15 state visits and 15 dated documents since 2022 for Cogir Of North Bay; 8 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated December 8, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

8 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee not meeting care needs
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Magdaleno arrived unnanounced to continue a complaint investigation and deliver findings regarding the above allegation(s) and met with Administrator Davina Barker. Licensee not meeting care needs – Reporting Party (RP) alleges that facility does not maintain residents room leaving sanitation and fall hazards as well as medication mismanagement. During the course of this investigation LPA reviewed records, made observations, and conducted interviews. Review of Housekeeping Guidelines indicated standard tasks that are expected to be completed by housekeeping. Review of Housekeeping Checklist indicated housekeeping signing off and informing residents of completed cleaning. Review of the assigned task sheet indicated all tasks assigned to specific housekeepers including additional requests or comments from residents. Review of Resident Housekeeping Declination form indicated that residents are able to decline housekeeping services. Review of resident LIC602CDSS inspection report, December 8, 2025 · control 21-AS-20251028103450
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility failed to safeguard residents belongings
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) A. Canela arrived unannounced for the purpose of gathering more information and delivering findings regarding the above allegation and met with Executive Director/Administrator, Tracy Freudendahl (S1). LPA previously toured the facility, resident (R1) room, toured parking lot, took statements and requested records. It was alleged the facility failed to safeguard residents belongings, when R1 was in the hospital. It was alleged R1s car had been driven and parked in another area and that there were things, including R1's checkbook and keys that were missing from the apartment. LPA toured the area and R1s vehicle was previously located in the front entrance parking lot. S1 had expressed that the car had been there for several months and it has not been moved since R1 left it there. LPA observed the vehicle appeared to have a low tire and observed there were several spider cobwebs around some tires, indicating the vehicle had been there and not moved for anCDSS inspection report, March 19, 2025 · control 21-AS-20241121135902

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedPersonal Rights
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) A. Canela arrived unannounced for the purpose of continuing complaint investigation and was greeted by Executive Director/Administrator, Tracy Freudendahl. LPA took additional statements and requested records. It was alleged the personal rights of a resident were violated due to a lack of communication by facility staff. Resident R2 was ready to return to the facility after a hospital emergency visit and it was reported Hospital staff made several calls to the facility explaining R2 was ready to be discharged but they were not able to speak with Health Wellness director to coordinate discharge and were just allowed to leave messages by the front staff. It was reported R2 was admitted to the hospital on 8/9/2024 and on 8/13 hospital was trying to discharge R2, but was not able to discharge until 8/15. Continue report see LIC9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 16, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240816133812
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not ensure that residents are served foods of good quality Staff did not ensure that the facility is maintained in good repair
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) A. Canela arrived unannounced for the purpose of continuing complaint investigation regarding the above allegations and met with Executive Director/Administrator, Tracy Freudendahl. This investigation included site visits to the facility; statements taken and LPA observations. It has been alleged facility staff do not ensure that residents are served foods of good quality, in that foods are served burned or cold. LPA took several statements from residents and no one corroborated the allegation. Residents expressed they like the food and have never had an issue with food being burned or cold. It was also alleged staff did not ensure the facility is maintained in good repair in that the outside smoking area gazebo tent is torn to shreds and water fountains are not operational. LPA observed the tent is in perfect condition. Facility staff expressed it was replaced about a month and a half ago due to needing a new cover but it was never in shreds. LPA observCDSS inspection report, August 21, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240620122804

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResidents needs are not being met by facility
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst Leibert arrives unannounced for the purpose of delivering findings on this complaint. This investigation included site visits to the facility; statements taken from witnesses and parties; as well as review of documents obtained during the course of the investigation. It has been alleged that the facility has not met R1's needs in that R1 has missed medical appointments; has not set up R1's voice mail; and does not wear a durable medical device prescribed following surgery because staff do not assist R1. The following determinations are made: R1 lives relatively independently with occasional transportation provided by the facility and has not contracted with the facility for additional care; R1's care plan and physician's assessment indicate R1 does not need assistance with activities of daily living; R1's states that R1 has chosen to not attend appointments or wear the medical device on occasions in the recent past. Although the allegation may be true, based oCDSS inspection report, October 30, 2023 · control 21-AS-20231019125734
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility elevator is in disrepair.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program analyst Leibert arrived unannounced for the purpose of investigating this complaint. LPA met with the Administrator, discussed the allegation, tested the elevator. LPA observed that the button on the elevator panel that designates third floor is not functioning properly, although the elevator is still functional. LPA learned that the Administrator has received bids for repair and is awaiting corporate approval for the large expenditure that is needed due to the age of the elevator. The following deficiencies were observed (see LIC 9099D) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 of California Regulation. Failure to correct the deficiency and/or repeat deficiencies within a 12 month period may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted and appeal of rights provided. $1,000.00 civil penalty issued for repeat violation within 12 months. Report left. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 31, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230727145132
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff failed to safeguard resident's funds
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 2/9/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tobola conducted an unannounced visit for the purpose of delivering complaint findings. LPA arrived and was greeted by Health Services Director, Dina Lopez. LPA toured the facility, reviewed staff and resident records, conducted interviews with staff and made observations. Complaint alleges facility staff failed to safeguard resident's (R1) funds. Based on a review of records, all caregiving staff that may have provided care to R1, did not have addresses matching the home address indicated of the alleged abuser. In addition, based on interviews with Health Service Director (HSD) and a review of R1’s records, LPA found that R1 was not able to handle their own finances and has a Power of Attorney in charge of their finances. Continued onto LIC9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 9, 2023 · control 21-AS-20221103162806

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 15 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
1
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
1
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
8
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
15
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →

Who runs Cogir Of North Bay?

From the CDSS ownership record, checked August 9, 2026.

Licensed to Welltower Cogir Tenant Llc; Cogir Mngt Usa Inc, who operates 5 licensed California homes in total. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(707) 552-3336
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Cogir Of North Bay? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.