Paramount House Senior Living is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Vacaville, Solano County, California — state license #486803710, with a licensed capacity of 95, listed as closed, change of ownership in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 44 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated December 18, 2025 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.
The state record lists this licence as “Closed, Change of Ownership”. A closed licence cannot admit residents. We keep closed licences published because “is this place licensed?” deserves an honest answer.
The state also licenses a home at this address today: Vacaville Senior Assisted Living Llc · licence #486804297 →
No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.
Since 2021, the state has visited this home 52 times and filed 44 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated December 18, 2025.
The state's published file for this home includes 21 documents with transcribed findings, dated July 30, 2021 to October 31, 2025. 21 of the 21 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (12), “Unsubstantiated” (9). 21 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.
Summary composed by computer from the 21 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
What the state’s words mean
Dec 18, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Dec 16, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Dec 16, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Dec 16, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Dec 16, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Oct 31, 2025Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Unqualified staff provide medical care to residents Facility staff administering medication without physician orders
At approximately 09:30 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Deniz arrived unannounced to deliver findings for a Complaint Investigation regarding the above allegations and met with Administrator, Agustin Samaniego During the course of the investigation, the Department requested and reviewed documents, conducted interviews, and made observations. The following allegations were investigated: “Unqualified staff provide medical care to residents” and “Facility staff administering medication without physician orders.” The complaint alleged that Medication Technicians (Med Techs) were being directed to check residents’ blood sugar levels and administer insulin injections. The complainant stated that these procedures are typically performed by licensed nursing staff, due to the clinical skills required to safely administer injections and monitor for potential complications. During the investigation, LPA conducted interviews with 4 staff members. 2 out of 4 staff members confirmed that Med Techthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 31, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250703131124
Oct 31, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident incontinence care needs not met. Lack of supervision resulting in resident injury. Personal Rights
At approximately 09:30AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Deniz arrived unannounced to deliver findings for a Complaint Investigation regarding the above allegations and met with Administrator, Agustin Samaniego During the course of the investigation, the Department requested and reviewed documents, conducted interviews, and made observations. The following allegations were investigated, “Resident incontinence care needs not met, lack of supervision resulting in resident injury, and personal rights.” The complainant alleged that the resident’s incontinence care needs were not being met, particularly during the morning shift, resulting in the resident remaining soiled for extended periods. The complainant also alleged a lack of supervision, which reportedly led to a preventable fall and injury involving the resident. Furthermore, the complainant alleged that neglect and failure to provide adequate care and oversight constituted a violation of the resident’s personal rights, including ththe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 31, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250729090042
Oct 30, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Oct 21, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Oct 21, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Jun 19, 2025Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff is providing care beyond the scope of the license
At approximately 09:30AM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Deniz and Felias arrived unannounced to deliver findings regarding a Complaint Investigation regarding the above allegations and met with Executive Director/Administrator, Agustin Samaniego. During the course of the investigation, the Department requested and reviewed documents, conducted interviews, and made observations. There is an allegation that “staff is providing care beyond the scope of the license.” Complainant alleged that Staff Member 1 (S1) was providing care such as fecal impaction removal, suppository insertion, and medicated cream administration to residents that they did not have training for. Complainant stated that S1 was a caregiver and did not have skilled professional training or medication technician training. On 06/05/2025, LPAs received information from the facility stating that an internal investigation was conducted regarding the complaint allegation. Per the information provided, the facility found tthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 19, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250602154555
May 15, 2025Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Personal Rights, facility is not answering phone line
On 5/15/2025, Licnesing Program Analyst (LPA) Shannan Hansen arrived unannounced to deliver complaint investigation findings regarding the above alligation and met with Agustin Samaniego, Administrator. Personal Rights, facility is not answering phone line- Complainant alleges resident has to make several, described as four to five attempts, calls prior to receiving a response from staff. Additionally, when resident calls are not answered are sent to the answering machine. Further review of investigation revealed response time is also refering to call bells. During the investigation LPA called facility line over 5 times lastly 5/14/2025 at 4:18pm and was answered on the first ring and was answered every time prior. LPA conducted interviews with residents and staff. Interviews with Administrator and RSD indicated staff should respond to a residents call within 15 minutes. Documents obtained confirmed that over a 1-month period (1/5/25 -2/20/25), R1 waited 15 minutes or more 57 times befthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 15, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250213151746
May 15, 2025Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure resident receives adequate bathing services Staff do not respond to resident call button requests in a timely manner Staff do not ensure residents room is kept free of mal odors
On 5/15/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Shannan Hansen arrived unannounced to deliver complaint investigation findings regarding the above alligation and met with Agustin Samaniego, Administrator. Staff do not ensure resident receives adequate bathing services- Complainant alleges staff do not provide adequate bathing services, is supposed to get bathed 2 times per week but the staff doesn’t ensure they are getting a full bath and will only get the top half of the body cleaned and on the other day they will only do the bottom half. Interview with Administrator informed when the resident has a shower a shower log is filled out by the staff. If there is no shower log, there was no shower. Records reviewed of R1’s Needs & Services Plan & Assessment indicate 2 person assist 2 times a week for bathing. LPA obtained shower log for time period of 10/28/2024 – 2/13/2025. Continue on LIC9099-C Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 15, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250210132414
Dec 30, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Dec 19, 2024Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff yells at residents. Staff do not ensure resident's incontinence needs are being met.
On 12/19/2024, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Julie Florio and Robert Frank arrived unannounced to deliver complaint investigation findings regarding the above allegations and met with Agustin Samaniego, Executive Director (ED). Reporting Party (RP) alleges that Staff 1 (S1) yells at residents and that Staff do not ensure Resident 1’s (R1’s) incontinence needs are being met, because staff are not responding timely to calls for help and are not cleaning R1 when changing their incontinent care briefs. Further, RP states that R1 is prone to urinary tract infections (UTIs) resulting in recent hospitalizations. LPA Julie Florio conducted 10-day complaint investigation visit on 11/14/2024 and obtained documents, made observations, and conducted interviews with Staff 2 (S2) and ED. LPA conducted a subsequent complaint investigation visit on 12/06/2024 and obtained documents, made observations, and conducted interviews with S2, ED, and R1. Continued on LIC9099C... Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 19, 2024 · control 21-AS-20241113104034
Dec 6, 2024Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff are not answering residents' call buttons in a timely manner. Staff are not meeting residents’ bathing needs.
On 12/06/2024, at approximately 4:30 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Julie Florio arrived unannounced to deliver findings for the above allegations. Reporting Party (RP) alleges that staff are not answering residents' call buttons in a timely manner and staff are not meeting residents’ bathing need, which are both SUBSTANTIATED. LPA conducted 10-day on 10/02/2024 for complaint #21-AS-20240930151325 which was received by The Department on 09/30/2024 and made observations, conducted interviews, and obtained documents. LPA interviewed Resident 2 (R2), Resident 3 (R3), and the Resident Services Director (RSD) which revealed that R2 and R3 have on multiple occasions waited extended periods of time after pushing their call pendants before receiving staff assistance. Continued on LIC9099C... Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 6, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240930151325
Dec 6, 2024Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not notify resident’s responsible party of an incident. Staff are not providing adequate food services to residents.
On 12/06/2024, at approximately 4:00 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Julie Florio arrived unannounced to deliver findings for the above allegations. Reporting Party (RP) alleges that staff did not notify Resident 1’s (R1’s) responsible party of an incident and that staff are not providing adequate food services to residents which are both UNSUBSTANTIATED. LPA conducted 10-day on 10/02/2024 for complaint #21-AS-20240930151325 which was received by The Department on 09/30/2024 and made observations, conducted interviews, and obtained documents. LPA was able to interview Resident 2 (R2), Resident 3 (R3), and the Resident Services Director (RSD) which revealed that R1’s responsible party was notified of the incident in question. Documents obtained confirmed that R1’s daughter, not R1’s spouse, was listed as the responsible party, and was notified of the incident as required. Continued on LIC9099C... Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 6, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240930151325
Apr 18, 2024Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility did not ensure a safe environment Facility not kept clean, safe and sanitary
On 4/18/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tobola arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering complaint investigation findings and was greeted by Administrator, Candace Moses. LPA Tobola conducted a tour of the facility, gathered photo evidence and written statements interviewed staff, reviewed facility medication records and made observations. Complaint alleges facility did not ensure a safe environment due to an incident involving outside unhoused individuals (I1) having access to the facility. Based upon interviews with Administrator and staff (S2 & S4) LPA confirmed that although undetermined how I1 gained access inside the facility, it was confirmed that an incident did occur where several unhoused individuals were observed in the common kitchen and lounge area during evening hours, which is an immediate safety risk to residents in care. Continued onto LIC9099-C Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 18, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240122214950
Mar 21, 2024Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Neglect/Lack of Care and Supervision resulted in resident being hospitalized
On 3/21/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tobola arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering complaint investigation findings and was greeted by Administrator, Candace Moses. LPA toured the facility, reviewed resident and facility records, interviewed staff and outside parties and made observations. Complaint alleges neglect/lack of supervision resulted in resident (R1) being hospitalized. Based on interviews with outside parties and facility staff, LPA received contradicting information with not enough corroborating information pertaining to the allegation. Upon review of R1's narrative charting records it was indicated that on 1/22/2023, R1 had been observed in their wheelchair located in their bedroom from approximately 3:00am-3:56pm. Charting records also indicated that R1 had refused assistance and medical services from the facility prior to being discovered. Based on R1's Needs & Service Plan, R1 requires a two-person assist when transferring from their wheelchair. LPAthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 21, 2024 · control 21-AS-20231129102127
Mar 21, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Dec 14, 2023Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff will not allow resident to return to the facility
On 12/14/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tobola arrived unannounced for the purpose of initiating and delivering complaint investigation findings and was greeted by Administrator, Candace Moses. LPA interviewed staff and outside parties, gathered facility and resident medical records and made observations. Complaint alleges staff will not allow resident (R1) to return to the facility. Based on record review and interviews with Administrator and outside parties, it was found that R1 had returned to the facility from a medical center on 12/12/2023. The same day on 12/12/2023, R1 was sent out for medical attention due to symptoms of clostridium difficile (C-diff). R1 was found to be diagnosed for C-diff by medical center staff on 12/7/2023. However, based on a review of R1's discharge paperwork, although medical instructions for C-diff medication was included in the discharge packet, the diagnosis was not listed on the discharge summary packet for facility notification. Facility wasthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 14, 2023 · control 21-AS-20231212110238
Oct 26, 2023Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Aug 18, 2023Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Year-by-year trend
Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.
No Google listing is on file for this home. When one exists, its rating, review themes, and hours appear here — attributed to Google, never blended with the state record, and never part of how we rank homes.
This home hasn’t added its own details yet. When the operator claims this page, their photos, tour video, activities, languages, and staffing answers appear here — always labeled as theirs, never blended with the state record. Operators: claim your home, free →
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Is Paramount House Senior Living licensed?
No — not currently. The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists Paramount House Senior Living in Vacaville (Solano County), California license #486803710, as “Closed, Change Of Ownership”, formerly licensed for 95 residents. State records list 44 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated December 18, 2025, appears in the inspection record on this page.
Can Paramount House Senior Living care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?
From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.
The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Paramount House Senior Living with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.
From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.
What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 95 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 5 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 10 RESIDENTS.
How much does Paramount House Senior Living cost?
California's public licensing record does not include Paramount House Senior Living's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Solano County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.
Does Paramount House Senior Living accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?
Paramount House Senior Living is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.
Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →
82 of 95 beds occupied (86%) when the state visited on October 31, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.
What do state inspections show for Paramount House Senior Living?
Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.
The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 52 state visits and 44 dated documents since 2021 for Paramount House Senior Living; 21 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated October 31, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated”. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.
Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.
2025
2024
2023
Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.
What the state has logged
California has logged 52 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.
You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.
(707) 455-0300Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.
Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →
See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →
This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →
Do you run Paramount House Senior Living? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.