Small home · Licensed for 6 · Vacaville
Buck Serenity Homes
691 Buck Avenue, Vacaville, CA 95688Licensed since 2008
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 6 residents
- Hospiceup to 3 residents
Not on file: dementia and bedridden approvals.
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
6 NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 3.
935 - ELDERLY
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
Care services
These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.
Incontinence care
Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 3 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Buck Serenity Homes: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight, help with medicines and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
Covelight estimate
$4,400a month to start
Likely $3,600–$5,450
From 8 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$4,400likely a month
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$4,400likely $3,600–$5,450
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes and similar homes within 15 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,600–$5,650
- $4,400
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,250–$8,850
- $6,900
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes8 nearby homes publish starting rates of $3,500 to $6,000
8 homes like this within 15 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,550–$5,350.
- Cogir of VacavilleVacaville · 4.2 mi · Mid-size home$3,795Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Bright Minds Residential CareFairfield · 5.4 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Five Acres at Leisure Town NorthVacaville · 5.8 mi · Mid-size home$4,550Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Hacienda Del Mar Care HomeSuisun City · 7.5 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Solano Life House Assisted Living & Memory CareDixon · 12 mi · Mid-size home$4,950Listed on its own website · memory care · seen October 5, 2026. We don’t have this home’s dementia-care disclosure. California requires a home that advertises dementia care to describe that care in writing when you ask.
- Country InnNapa · 13 mi · Mid-size home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- The Olive HouseNapa · 14 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Napa Valley Memory CareNapa · 15 mi · Mid-size home$3,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes and similar homes within 15 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.
The best way to see it is a visit.
Request a tourWhere it is
691 Buck Avenue, Vacaville, CA 95688Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- Northbay Vacavalley HospitalHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list3.2 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #486802085 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 4 of 7 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 1 “Substantiated”.
20262 state visits · 2 documents
Mar 5, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Contreras arrived unannounced to conduct a required annual inspection and was greeted by administrator(admin) Gideon Castro. Facility is an Adult Residential Care for the Elderly licensed for a capacity of 6 residents. There are currently 5 residents in care. Facility is a two story facility, residents reside in first floor and staff rooms are located in second floor of facility. LPA toured the building and grounds which was found to be at a comfortable temperature. LPA observed at least a 2- day supply of perishable and 7- day supply of non-perishable food. Expiration dates were not noted in some food items in refrigerator (Technical Violation given). Resident bathroom had required bath mat and grab bar. Bathroom found with paper towels and toilet paper. Dryer and washer found operational. Toxins found in two resident bathrooms unlocked under bathroom sink including chemicals found unsecured in bathrooms accessible for residents(Deficiency cited, see 809D). Water temperature in sink accessible to residents in care measured within the allowable range of 105 to 120 degrees F. Resident bedroom observed to be equipped with lighting, night stand, and chest of drawer. LPA toured the outside backyard of facility and observed emergency exits free from obstruction. Noticeable spider webs and collected dust observed in resident window sills (Technical Violation given). Five out of five resident rooms did not have door signal system turned on in door that leads to outdoor perimeter of facility (Deficiency cited, see 809D). Fire extinguishers were last inspected 4/15/2025. Smoke/Carbon Monoxide detectors located throughout the facility are tested through Fire Marshall. Disaster drills conducted quarterly. LPA conducted file review for 5 out of 5 residents. LIC613 Personal Rights signature missing from one (R1) resident file (Technical Advisory given). Continued onto 809C..... continued from 809... LPA conducted file review for 3 staff. One staff (S1) missing LIC501 Job Application (Technical Advisory given) . LPA conducted medication spot check. Centrally stored log up was observed to not be complete with 9 medications not listed in Centrally Stored Medication Log for R2 (Deficiency cited, see 809D). Updated copies of the following documents were requested for facility file and are to be submitted to CCL within 30 days of this visit: LIC500- Personnel Report LIC308- Designation of Responsibility Liability Insurance Deficiencies cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 of California Regulation and the Health and Safety Code. Appeal rights given and discussed with Administrator. Failure to correct the deficiency and/or repeat deficiencies within a 12 month period may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted with administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 5, 2026
Jan 29, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure resident's bathing needs are being met Staff admitted a resident who required a higher level of care
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Contreras arrived unannounced to deliver complaint findings regarding complaint #21-AS-20251103153410. LPA was greeted by administrator (admin) Gideon Castro. During the investigation, the Department requested and reviewed documents, conducted interviews and made observations. Complaint alleges staff admitted a resident who required a higher level of care and staff do not ensure resident's bathing needs are being met. Complainant states that resident (R1) was not showered by facility staff due to R1’s large size which requires a two-person assist. During the investigation, LPA reviewed R1’s Preplacement appraisal completed and signed by licensee on 9/24/25. Preplacement appraisal indicates that upon admission, the facility concluded that R1 needed help with bathing, hair care, and personal hygiene; moreover, it was assessed that R1 needed a two-person assist. The Preplacement appraisal also indicates that R1 needed a two-person assist when needing help with transferring in and out of bed and dressing. Continued onto 9099-C... Substantiated continued from 9099-A..... During investigation, LPA reviewed R1’s Preplacement appraisal which indicates that, upon admission, the facility concluded that R1 required a two-person assist. The Preplacement appraisal also indicates that R1 needed a two-person assist when needing help with transferring in and out of bed and dressing. Licensee advised LPA that additional reason for eviction was that he was sick of R1’s responsible party’s demands. LPA advised licensee of regulation 87224 which provides the conditions under which a resident can be lawfully evicted. Licensee did not issue a formal written eviction notice, only a text message indicating his frustration and desire to have R1 find another home. R1 subsequently left the facility. However, R1 was not removed from the facility by licensee, R1 left of their own accord. So, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Copy of report read and given to administrator continued from 9099.... During the investigation, licensee advised LPA that they “could not handle” R1’s care any longer because R1 had “too many changes of condition". Licensee advised LPA during preplacement it was determined that R1 was only a one person assist, according to facility’s assessment. However, licensee claims that R1 was now requiring a two-person assist which is a higher level of care than previously identified. During investigation, LPA reviewed R1’s Preplacement appraisal which indicates that, upon admission, the facility concluded that R1 required a two-person assist. The Preplacement Appraisal also indicates that R1 needed a two-person assist when needing help with transferring in and out of bed and dressing. LPA reviewed R1’s Admission Agreement, which lists the basic services provided by the facility will include, at a minimum, assistance with bathing. LPA requested proof of facility providing showers to R1 but facility could not produce a shower log or any documentation of facility providing showers. Additionally, during the investigation, LPA conducted interviews. Witness (W1) reported to LPA that facility staff refused to give R1 showers due to R1’s large size and having to use a Hoyer lift; instead, they would give R1 bed baths. W1 reported to LPA that the only showers R1 received were provided by non-facility staff. Therefore, based on LPA’s interviews and record review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 Chapter 8, are being cited on the attached 9099-D. Copy of report read and given to administrator. Appeal rights given.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 29, 2026 · control 21-AS-20251103153410
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: HSC 1569.269(a)(6) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 29, 2026
§1569.269Enumerated rights(a) Residents of residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following rights: (6) To care, supervision, and services that meet their individual needs...delivered by staff that are sufficient in numbers, qualifications, and competency to meet their needs. This requirement has not been met as evidence by: Based on records review, observations and interviews conducted Licensee did not ensure to services needs were provided necessary to meet individual care needs which poses an immediate risk to the health and safety of residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 29, 2026
Plan of correction: Facility to submit plan to register all staff to participate/attend the ombudsman training for personal rights. Facility to submit plan to contact the local ombudsman to facilitate personal rights training for all staff by plan of correction due date. Facility to get the date of the next personal rights training and provide the date to CCL by no later than 2/04/25. Once attendance/ participation is completed facility to submit training certificate or record showing all staff in attendance, hours of attendance, date of attendance, and instructor name. Training to be completed by 3/01/2026.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: HSC 87464(f)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 29, 2026
Basic Services 87464(f)(4) Personal assistance and care...as indicated in the pre admission appraisal, with those activities of daily living such as...bathing... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interviews Staff refused to give R1 showers due to R1’s large size and facility was not able to provide documentation of shower logs.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 29, 2026
Plan of correction: Licensee to submit self certification that staff will be trained on documenting all bathing needs and refusals for all residents as indicated in their admissions agreement .In addition licensee to submit weekly bathing logs for the following 3 weeks to CCLD Licensee to submit self certification to CCL by Plan of Correction due date of 1/30/2026
20251 state visit · 1 document
Apr 29, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Christi Coppo and Ethel Contreras arrived unannounced to conduct a required Annual inspection and was greeted by Administrator Gideon Castro. Facility contact information was reviewed. At approximately 10:00am LPA and Admin toured the building and grounds. The facility was found to be clean and at a comfortable temperature. LPA observed at least a 2 day supply of perishable and 7 day supply of non-perishable food. Food was found to be stored in a safe manner with open items covered. Kitchen cabinet containing cleaning supplies was locked. Kitchen drawer with sharp knives locked. All bedrooms were equipped with lighting, night stand, and chest of drawers. All bedrooms were clean and in good repair. Extra hygiene products and linens were available. Resident bathroom did not have required bath mat(Technical). Restrooms did have required grab bar. Facility has two water heaters. Water temperature in sink accessible to residents in care measured at 116.6 degrees F which is within the allowable range of 105 to 120 degrees F. Restroom in room six water measured at 99.01 which is not within the allowable range of 105 to 120 degrees F. Bedroom five had oxygen tanks in which 1 out of 3 were not placed in holder and not strapped to the wall (Technical). LPAs observed Thick-It thickener stored under stairs made accessible to residents. Thickener prescribed to resident's name that does not match any current residents. Medication fridge unlocked, making medication accessible to residents. Fridge had suppositories (Bisacodyl 10mg) with resident's name that does not match any current residents. Insulin pen without a label inside ziplock bag in also in fridge. (Deficiency cited, see 809D). Medications found to be pre-poured in small plastic containers inside kitchen drawer on left hand side of refrigerator and not in its originally received container. (Deficiency cited, see 809D) Continued on 809C... Continued from 809... Tiles on vanity in bathroom next to room #4 and around left hand side of kitchen sink observed to have dark black substance present in grout as well as broken tile. Deck ramp on wrap around deck has two sections of plywood. Section of plywood in the middle of ramp bows heavily under pressure, cracking sound when stepped on. (Deficiency cited, see 809D). Fire extinguishers were last inspected 4/1/25. Smoke/Carbon Monoxide detectors located throughout the facility were tested and operational. Facility’s last quarterly disaster drills were conducted with each staff member during their respective training days, LPA observed all training dates for respective staff were within the quarter. Facility has a backup generator for use during a power outage. LPA conducted a review of 4 resident records. All required documentation present. 1/2 rails and crushed meds orders all on file for respective residents. LPA conducted review of 3 staff records. Health Screening for all staff appeared fabricated. Health Screenings had same exact hand writing and date of visits listed within 3 days of each other. Furthermore, signature of physician appeared to be he same on all screens and lacked date. Additionally, TB test marked as negative but action taken listed as chest X-ray. LPAs discussed appearance of fabrication with admin. Admin denies fabrication. Admin agrees to submit current health screenings with TB clearance to CCL. Three out of three staff had expired first aid expiring on 1/06/2025. Additionally, LPAs attempted verification of first aid certificate numbers via American Red Cross website, unable to locate certificate. (Deficiency cited, see 809D). Continued on 809C(2).... Continued on from 809-C... LPA and Admin conducted a spot check of medication and medication records. Medication is centrally stored in a locked closet. LPAs advised admin to complete prescribing physician;on Centrally Stored Medication Log. Gideon Castro Administrator Certificate #7004971740 expires 5/19/2026. All fees are current as of this time. LPA and Administrator discussed facility's Infection Control Plan and Emergency Disaster plan. No new updates. Updated copies of the following documents were requested for facility file and are to be submitted to CCL within 30 days of this visit: LIC500- Personnel Report LIC308- Designation of Responsibility Liability Insurance Deficiencies cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 of California Regulation and the Health and Safety Code. Appeal rights given and discussed with Administrator. Failure to correct the deficiency and/or repeat deficiencies within a 12 month period may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted with Administrator and a copy of this report was given. LPAs experienced printer issues and was unable to final print, time of completion 3:50pm. LPAs will email copy of report and deficencies.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2025
The state marks this report as 9 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 7. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
20241 state visit · 1 document
Apr 18, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sabrina Calzada arrived unannounced to conduct a required annual. LPA met with Gideon Castro, Administrator and Elena Castro, caregiver, and explained purpose of inspection. Also present were caregivers, Teodorico Santos and Gina Taganahan. LPA observed (1) resident to be visiting with a family member in the common area and (3) residents to be resting in their rooms. The facility is located away from the main street and is up on a hill with a view. There are no neighbors in close proximity. The facility is licensed for (6) non-ambulatory residents and has a hospice waiver for (3). Currently, there is (1) resident under hospice care. toured the interior and exterior of the facility including the common areas, (4) private resident bedrooms (6) private resident bedrooms, (4) resident bathrooms, kitchen, laundry area and (2) staff rooms on the second floor. LPA observed the facility to be clean, in good repair and odor-free. LPA observed the bathrooms to have the necessary grab bars, non-skid flooring, paper towels and hand-washing posters. There is sufficient 2+day perishable, including fresh produce, and 7+day non-perishable supply of food. Sharps, medications and toxins are locked in/near the kitchen. The inside temperature measured 76*F and the hot water measured 105*F in resident bathroom. The smoke/monoxide alarms are working and quarterly drills are conducted. There are sufficient linens/towels/blankets and paper supplies, including PPE. Each resident room has an exit to the backyard and there is main parking gate near the front entrance. There are no pools/ponds. LPA reviewed (2) of (4) resident files and found them to be organized and contain current physician's reports and appraisals. Medications were reviewed for (1) resident- orders matched medications administered and MAR documentation is current. LPA reviewed (5) of (9) staff files and found them to be complete and contain current training documentation, including for First Aid/CPR. RCFE Administrator Certificate #6016577740- exp 5/19/24- renewal has been initiated. All staff is cleared and associated. LPA requested an updated copy of the LIC308, LIC500 by 4/25/24. Copy of current liability insurance was obtained. There are no citations issued. Exit interview. Copy of report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 18, 2024
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 3 documents
20231 state visit · 1 document
Feb 24, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jill Nakagawa arrived unannounced to conduct a REQUIRED 1 Year Annual Inspection and was greeted by staff, who asked LPA to sign in and sanitize hands. The Administrator, Gideon Castro, showed LPA around the facility. There were 3 staff at the time of inspection and 3 residents and 1 respite stay. This visit is focused on infection control. The facility has submitted an infection control plan, which was approved by Community Care Licensing. The facility was clean and comfortable temperature, exits were free from obstructions. Bathrooms had grab bars, non-skid mats and outfitted with paper towels and soap. Staff were all observed to be wearing masks, and all visitors are required to wear masks as well. There were three (3) fire extinguishers; last inspected 03/11/2022 and were fully charged. There is a hard-wired fire alarm system as well as individual battery-operated smoke detectors, and two (2) carbon monoxide detectors that were operational. Auditory alarms on all exit doors were functional. All residents rooms were furnished per regulation. Signs were also posted throughout the facility to promote social distancing and hand washing. In the event of a COVID outbreak, the facility is able to isolate and quarantine all residents. Facility has at least a 30 day supply of incontinence and Personal Protective Equipment. All staff and residents are vaccinated and boosted. There were signs posted for "Oxygen in Use" as one resident is occasionally receiving oxygen. All residents were dressed appropriately and well-groomed. The facility is well-lit and provides a homey atmosphere. There were no deficiencies found at the time of inspection. No citations issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 24, 2023
20221 state visit · 1 document
Feb 4, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Katrina Walters arrived unannounced to conduct a REQUIRED 1 Year Annual Inspection and was greeted by staff. The Administrator, Gideon Castro arrived later. This visit is focused on infection control. The facility has submitted an infection control plan, which was approved by Community Care Licensing. The visitor policy was posted on the exterior door. At the entrance there was a sign in book disinfecting wipes and hand sanitizer for visitors. LPA toured the facility with staff and made the following observations: The facility was clean and comfortable temperature, exits were free from obstructions. The fire extinguisher was last inspected 2/25/21. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors appeared to be operational. Auditory alarms on all exit doors were on an functional. All residents rooms were furnished per regulation. Signs were also posted throughout the facility to promote social distancing and hand washing. In the event of a COVID outbreak, the facility is able to isolate and quarantine all residents. Facility has at least a 30 day supply of incontinence and Personal Protective Equipment. Facility is disinfected twice daily, and after usage. Facility has a system for documenting the vaccination status of residents, visitors, and staff. All staff and resident's are 100% vaccinated. Per Administrator they have received infection control training from Solano Public Health. Continued on 809 D At approximately 2:10 PM, LPA observed wound medication on the side table in resident (R1)'s bedroom. LPA then observed that R1 had a wound that was approximately 5 inches long on their ankle. (picture taken). The wound appeared to be beyond a stage 2. R1 had an appointment with wound clinic. Facility did not document the wound on the resident needs and service appraisal or in an incident report, however per Administrator the wound appeared a month ago. The following deficiencies were observed (see LIC 809D) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 of California Regulation. Failure to correct the deficiency and/or repeat deficiencies within a 12 month period may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted and appeal of rights provided to the Administrator, Gideon Castro. Appeal Rights Given.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 4, 2022
20211 state visit · 1 document
Jul 16, 2021Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff failed to execute emergency disaster plan Staff failed to provide care and supervision to resident
**Amended** Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Katrina Walters and Jill Nakagawa conducted an unannounced complaint visit and met with Administrator, Gideon Castro. The purpose of the visit is to deliver findings for the allegations listed above. The complainant alleged that on 08/19/2020 during LNU lightning fire, the facility failed to execute emergency disaster plan and that Staff failed to provide care and supervision to residents. During the course of this investigation, LPA virtually toured the facility by way of Administrator on 3/11/21, interviewed staff and various outside parties, reviewed the facilities emergency disaster plan dated 9/25/18, reviewed resident records, reviewed videos and made observations. Continued on 9099 C Substantiated **Amended** Continued from 9099 Based on interviews conducted and documents gathered LPA learned that the facility provided an emergency plan to the resident’s responsible parties which is different then the Emergency Disaster Plan on file with Community Care Licensing (CCL). Interviews further revealed that on 8/19/20, when the facility received a mandatory evacuation notification due to approaching fires the facility did not follow the emergency disaster plan that was on file with CCL which identified two evacuations sites and a transportation plan different than what was executed. Based on interviews with the administrator, staff and various outside parties LPA learned that upon being alerted that the facility was to be evacuated, the Administrator contacted two of four residents (R2 &R3) responsible parties and asked that they transport the residents to an evacuation location of their own. One of four residents (R1) responsible party arrived at the facility and picked up R1 from the facility before the Administrator could call. Because residents (R4) responsible party lived out of the area facility staff allowed R4 to be transported by another resident’s responsible party (video footage on file). A review of R4s care plan identifies that the resident requires 24-hour care and supervision. R4 remained with this individual, who was not R4’s responsible party or staff member for several hours before they were able to make contact with the licensee and make arrangements to transport R4 to staff (S1’s) residence rather than the evacuation site identified on the facility’s emergency plan. The Administrator then picked up R4 and transported them to the evacuation location. Although R4s responsible party was notified of the evacuation Licensee did not to provide full details how R4 was evacuated and where they were initially evacuated to. Continued on 9099 C **Amended** Continued from 9099 C Based upon statements received, records reviewed and video footage it was determined that the Licensee did not evacuate residents to the two emergency sites listed on the facility emergency disaster plan dated 9/25/18 and because R4 was required to remain with R1s responsible party for several hours following the evacuation, it is determined that staff failed to provide care and supervision for R4. Therefore, both allegations are SUBSTANTIATED. Based upon the records reviewed and statements received during interviews the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Therefore, the allegation is SUBSTANTIATED. The following deficiencies were observed (see LIC 9099D) and cited from the California Code of Regulations and or Health Safety Code, Title 22, Division 6 of California Regulation. Failure to correct the deficiency and/or repeat deficiencies within a 12-month period may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted and appeal of rights provided. **Amended** It was alleged that Facility did not have transportation to evacuate all residents during a mandatory evacuation on 8/19/20 due to a wildfire. Based on Interviews conducted with staff and various outside parties, LPA's observations and records reviewed LPA learned the following: Per the Administrator the facility had transportation, but did not transport resident as outlined in their disaster plan to transport residents to safety (failure to use their vehicles is cited under the allegation that facility failed to execute facility’s emergency disaster plan). Instead responsible parties were asked that they transport residents to a safe location. Although interviews with staff and outside parties confirmed that transportation was there, LPA was unable to prove or disprove if the transportation would support all residents. A finding that the complaint allegation facility did not have transportation to evacuate all residents is unsubstantiated meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 16, 2021 · control 21-AS-20210304082028
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: HSC 1569.695(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 19, 2021
HSC 1569.695 Emergency Plans 1569.695(a)(1)...a residential care facility for the elderly shall have an emergency plan that shall include..(1) Evacuation procedures. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: based on interviews & record reviews, licensee failed to ensure the facility’s emergency plan sent to CCL was implemented 8/19/20 during mandatory evacuation. This posed an immediate health & safety risk to the residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 16, 2021
Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to review HSC 1569.695 and update facilities LIC 610E, licensee to review the regulation and updated emergency plan with all staff using sign in sheet, licensee to provide a copy of the updated plan to residents and responsible parties and send LIC 610E, sign-in sheet to LPA by POC due 7/24/21. Licensee to create a plan of how they will ensure future compliance POC due 7/23/21.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: HSC 1569.269(a)(6) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 19, 2021
HSC 1569.269(a)(6) Enumerated Rights: 1569.269(a)(6) Residents of residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following rights: To care, supervision, and services that meet their individual needs and are delivered by staff..This requirement was not met as evidenced by: based on interviews and record review, the licensee failed to ensure adequate supervision was provided to 1 of 4 residents on 8/19/20, which posed an immediate health & safety risk to the residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 16, 2021
Plan of correction: Administrator to submit a self-certification that they have reviewed regulation regarding Care and Supervision and submit plan to CCL of how they will ensure future compliance to all residents in the event of an evacuation to CCL by POC date of 07/16/2021.
4 of 6 beds were occupied at the January 29, 2026 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Gideon B. Castro, licensed since 2008.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2008, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 7
- Total complaints
- 1
- Substantiated allegations
- 2
- Type A citations
- 2
- Type B citations
- 0
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2008, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 2 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 0 | 0 |
| Substantiated allegations | 2 | 0 |
| Total complaints | 1 | 0 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Buck Serenity Homes
Is Buck Serenity Homes licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Buck Serenity Homes licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Buck Serenity Homes been cited?
2 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2008, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 7 state visits over the same years.
Is Buck Serenity Homes still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.
What does Buck Serenity Homes cost?
$4,400 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,600–$5,450. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes and similar homes within 15 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 7 other homes of a similar licensed size across Solano County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,984 to $5,000 a month, and the middle figure is $4,950 (n = 7 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Buck Serenity Homes take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Gideon B. Castro, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Northbay Vacavalley Hospital is 3.2 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Buck Serenity Homes keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 3 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Buck Serenity Homes license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “BUCK SERENITY HOMES”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #486802085. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to Gideon B. Castro, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2008, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 7 state inspection visits since 2008, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 2 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2008, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 7 state visits in that period.
- 1 complaint and 2 substantiated allegations on file since 2008, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is March 5, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in Solano County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Starting rate
$3,450 a month to start
Listed by the home on its own website · October 27, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,600 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,550–$5,850On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,850 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,000–$6,000On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,050 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,150–$6,200On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,950 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,050–$6,100On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,900 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,000–$6,050On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore Solano County