Large community · Licensed for 93 · Redding
Veterans Home of California-Redding
3400 Knighton Road, Redding, CA 96002Licensed since 2013
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Licensed for 93: a large care communityThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 93 residents
- Hospiceup to 16 residents
- Bedriddenup to 93 residents
Not on file: dementia approval.
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
93 NON-AMBULATORY; ALL OF WHICH MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. MCCLOUD BUILDING APPROVED FOR DELAYED EGRESS. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 16.
945 - ADULTS / ELDERLY
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 16 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Veterans Home of California-Redding: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight, help with medicines and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
Covelight estimate
$5,000a month to start
Likely $3,900–$6,400
From 8 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Monthly cost breakdownWith a studio and basic help · room, care and fees$5,000likely a month
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$5,000likely $3,900–$6,400
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 communities with 50 or more beds within 25 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,900–$6,550
- $5,000
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,750–$9,650
- $7,500
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes8 nearby homes publish starting rates of $2,894 to $7,355
8 homes like this within 25 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,300–$5,750.
- The Vistas Assisted Living & Memory CareRedding · 3.8 mi · Large community$5,390Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
- Oakmont of ReddingRedding · 5.4 mi · Large community$5,095Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Sundial Assisted LivingRedding · 7.1 mi · Large community$3,600Listed on its own website · shared suite · seen October 5, 2026
- Willow Springs Alzheimer's Special Care CenterRedding · 7.3 mi · Large community$7,355Listed on its own website · seen October 27, 2026
- Hilltop Springs Senior LivingRedding · 7.7 mi · Large community$5,495Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
- Sierra Oaks of ReddingRedding · 7.7 mi · Large community$2,894Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Oakdale Heights of ReddingRedding · 7.8 mi · Large community$4,295Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Lassen House Senior LivingRed Bluff · 24 mi · Large community$5,295Listed on its own website · deluxe studio · seen October 27, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 communities with 50 or more beds within 25 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Daily life here is not on file yet, and that says nothing about the home.
The best way to see it is a visit.
Request a tourWhere it is
3400 Knighton Road, Redding, CA 96002Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
The state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #455002486 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 6 of 17 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 2 “Unfounded”.
20263 state visits · 3 documents
Sep 9, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On August 26, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ivan Avila arrived at the facility unannounced and conducted the required 1-year annual inspection. LPA Avila met with Administrator Pamela Eiszele and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Avila completed the CaresTOOL during the visit. No deficiencies were observed during the visit. LPA reviewed the findings with the facility representative. The facility representative signed the LIC 809, and a copy of the report was provided to the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 9, 2026
Aug 26, 2026Facility evaluation reportAnnual/RandomReport on file
Type of visit: Annual/Random
On August 26, 2026 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ivan Avila arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a 1-year annual inspection and met with Pamela Eiszele and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Avila and Administrator toured facility together to ensure the health and safety of residents in care. Kitchen: The kitchen appeared clean and the appliances and fixtures functional during the time of visit. The LPA observed a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food at the facility; Sharp objects are stored in a locked area. Water temperature measured in the designated range. Bedrooms: The LPA observed resident bedrooms furnished with at least one night stand, bed, and sufficient lighting for each resident. The bedrooms had appropriate and adequate bedding and linens such as sheets, pillowcases, and blankets. Bathrooms: The LPA observed the resident bathrooms to be clean, and properly supplied. Residents have sufficient supplies for personal hygiene products. Common Areas: These included but are not limited to the living area, activity area, and dining area. The common areas were checked for cleanliness and furniture was checked for functionality during time of visit. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. Surrounding Grounds (Outdoors): The LPA observed appropriate outdoor furniture, with a covered shaded area for residents. There are no firearms or bodies of water on the premises. Record Review: A review of facility files was initiated. The LPA observed documentation of the Infection Control, Disaster prevention and last fire drill. Facility records are stored inaccessible to residents. The LPA reviewed eight (8) staff, and eight (8) resident files. All documents reviewed appeared complete and current. Medications: During the facility visit a medications review was initiated. Medications are centrally stored and locked in a cabinet inaccessible to residents in care; medications are labeled and checked for expiration dates. Medications are properly documented on the centrally stored medications and destruction record log. No errors observed during the medication review. No deficiencies cited during today's visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 26, 2026
Jan 7, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnfounded
Allegation investigated: Staff handled resident in a rough manner, resulting in an injury
On January 7, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ivan Avila conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegation directed by the Department. LPA Avila met with Pamela Eiszele and explained the purpose of the visit. During the investigation process, interviews and a review of records were initiated. California Department of Social Services-Community Care Licensing Division-Investigations Branch obtained and reviewed documents. LPA reviewed facility records. ----- Continued on LIC9099-C ----- Unfounded Complaint alleges “Staff handled resident in a rough manner, resulting in an injury.” LPA interviewed R1 and R1 reported they could not recall if staff handled them in a rough manner. R1 reported they felt jaw pain during their examination. Based on medical records R1 was diagnosed with Temporomandibular Joint Disorder (TMJ) and was treated with a steroid injection. No injury was documented in R1's medical records obtained by the investigation branch. Based on the evidence provided, the preponderance of evidence standards was not met, therefore, the above allegation is found to be UNFOUNDED. An unfounded allegation means that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 7, 2026 · control 59-AS-20251029151721
20252 state visits · 2 documents
Oct 13, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded
Allegation investigated: Unlawful Eviction
On October 13, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ivan Avila conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegation directed by the Department. LPA Avila met with Jessica Kopps and explained the reason for the visit. The complaint was not directed at this facility. The resident does not live at the facility. Resident lives in a skilled nursing facility that is not licensed through the Department. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging: Staff are not providing proper catheter assistance to client, Staff are not providing showers to client in need. We have found that the complaint was unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 13, 2025 · control 59-AS-20251010142057
Aug 20, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On August 20, 2025 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ivan Avila arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a 1-year annual inspection and met with Pamela Eiszele and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Avila and Administrator toured facility together to ensure the health and safety of residents in care. Kitchen: The kitchen appeared clean and the appliances and fixtures functional during the time of visit. The LPA observed a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food at the facility; Sharp objects are stored in a locked area. Water temperature measured in the designated range. Bedrooms: The LPA observed resident bedrooms furnished with at least one night stand, bed, and sufficient lighting for each resident. The bedrooms had appropriate and adequate bedding and linens such as sheets, pillowcases, and blankets. Bathrooms: The LPA observed the resident bathrooms to be clean, and properly supplied. Residents have sufficient supplies for personal hygiene products. Common Areas: These included but are not limited to the living area, activity area, and dining area. The common areas were checked for cleanliness and furniture was checked for functionality during time of visit. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. Surrounding Grounds (Outdoors): The LPA observed appropriate outdoor furniture, with a covered shaded area for residents. There are no firearms or bodies of water on the premises. Record Review: A review of facility files was initiated. The LPA observed documentation of the Infection Control, Disaster prevention and last fire drill. Facility records are stored inaccessible to residents. The LPA reviewed eight (8) staff, and eight (8) resident files. All documents reviewed appeared complete and current. Medications: During the facility visit a medications review was initiated. Medications are centrally stored and locked in a cabinet inaccessible to residents in care; medications are labeled and checked for expiration dates. Medications are properly documented on the centrally stored medications and destruction record log. No errors observed during the medication review. No deficiencies cited during today's visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 20, 2025
20241 state visit · 1 document
Aug 6, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 08/06/2024 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ivan Avila arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a 1-year annual inspection and met with Pamela Eiszele and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Avila and Administrator toured facility together to ensure the health and safety of residents in care. Kitchen: The kitchen appeared clean and the appliances and fixtures functional during the time of visit. The LPA observed a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food at the facility; Sharp objects are stored in a locked area. Water temperature measured in the designated range. Bedrooms: The LPA observed resident bedrooms furnished with at least one night stand, bed, and sufficient lighting for each resident. The bedrooms had appropriate and adequate bedding and linens such as sheets, pillowcases, and blankets. Bathrooms: The LPA observed the resident bathrooms to be clean, and properly supplied. Residents have sufficient supplies for personal hygiene products. Common Areas: These included but are not limited to the living area, activity area, and dining area. The common areas were checked for cleanliness and furniture was checked for functionality during time of visit. In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. Surrounding Grounds (Outdoors): The LPA observed appropriate outdoor furniture, with a covered shaded area for residents. There are no firearms or bodies of water on the premises. Record Review: A review of facility files was initiated. The LPA observed documentation of the Infection Control, Disaster prevention and last fire drill. Facility records are stored inaccessible to residents. The LPA reviewed eight (8) staff, and eight (8) resident files. All documents reviewed appeared complete and current. Medications: During the facility visit a medications review was initiated. Medications are centrally stored and locked in a cabinet inaccessible to residents in care; medications are labeled and checked for expiration dates. Medications are properly documented on the centrally stored medications and destruction record log. No errors observed during the medication review. No deficiencies cited during today's visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 6, 2024
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 11 documents
20234 state visits · 4 documents
Oct 4, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Insufficient staff to meet resident needs
On 10/04/2023 Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Ivan Avila and Jaynae Boyles conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegation directed by the Department. LPA Avila met with Pamela Eiszele and explained the purpose of the visit. During the interview process, five staff members and three residents were interviewed. In addition, a staff and resident roster list were reviewed, and a call log history was also reviewed. During the interview process, it was stated that residents have three call buttons in their rooms. Once a resident presses their call button for help, staff respond within a couple of minutes. Resident interviews stated that staff are meeting their needs and there is sufficient staff at the facility but could be better. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 4, 2023 · control 59-AS-20230725151536
The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 1. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Sep 26, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 09/26/2023 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ivan Avila arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a 1-year annual inspection and met with Pamela Eiszele and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Avila and Administrator toured facility together to ensure the health and safety of residents in care. Kitchen: The kitchen appeared clean and the appliances and fixtures functional during the time of visit. The LPA observed a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food at the facility; Sharp objects are stored in a locked area. Water temperature measured at 117 degrees. Bedrooms: The LPA observed resident bedrooms furnished with at least one night stand, bed, and sufficient lighting for each resident. The bedrooms had appropriate and adequate bedding and linens such as sheets, pillowcases, and blankets. Bathrooms: The LPA observed the resident bathrooms to be clean, and properly supplied. Residents have sufficient supplies for personal hygiene products. Common Areas: These included but at not limited to the living area, activity area, and dining area. The common areas were checked for cleanliness and furniture was checked for functionality during time of visit. Surrounding Grounds (Outdoors): The LPA observed appropriate outdoor furniture, with a covered shaded area for residents. There are no bodies of water on the premises. Record Review: Facility records are stored inaccessible to residents. The LPA reviewed five (5) staff, and five (5) resident files. All documents reviewed appeared complete and current. Medications: During the facility visit a medications review was initiated. Medications are centrally stored and locked in a cabinet inaccessible to residents in care; medications are labeled and checked for expiration dates. Medications are properly documented on the centrally stored medications and destruction record log. No errors observed during the medication review. Exit interview conducted and copy of the report was provided to Pamela Eiszele.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 26, 2023
Feb 6, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: The administrator does not treat the residents with dignity and respect.
Donna Gurriere, Licensing Program Analyst was in contact and met with Pamela Eiszele, Administrator. Allegation is that the administrator does not treat the residents with dignity and respect. LPA Gurriere completed the required COVID-19 testing protocols, and a daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID 19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms. The administrator/staff person was contacted to complete a facility risk assessment. LPA Gurriere ensured that hand sanitizer was applied before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: Surgical mask. Additionally, LPA Gurriere was screened by a staff person upon entering the facility. continued Unsubstantiated The administrator does not treat the residents with dignity and respect. During the investigative process, the administrator, five staff persons and four residents were interviewed. During the interview process several persons indicated that they were surprised that there was an allegation of the sort. Staff persons and residents stated that they have not had a problem with the administrator, that they felt that she does her best and that they do believe that the administrator treats the residents with dignity and respect. Overall, it was reported that the administrator does show dignity and respect to the residents. Although the allegation may have happened, or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred, and the findings are Unsubstantiated.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 6, 2023 · control 25-AS-20230111150136
Jan 17, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility stopped delivering packages to residents.
Donna Gurriere, Licensing Program Analyst was in contact and met with , Pamela Eiszele, Administrator. Allegation is in regard to Facility stopped delivering packages to residents. LPA Gurriere completed the required COVID-19 testing protocols, and a daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID 19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms. The administrator/staff person was contacted to complete a facility risk assessment. LPA Gurriere ensured that hand sanitizer was applied before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: Surgical mask. Additionally, LPA Gurriere was screened by a staff person upon entering the facility. continued Substantiated During the investigation documents were obtained. A letter was sent to the residents that read “Effective Wednesday September 14, 2022, packages will no longer be delivered to you. Staff will have packages available for you to pick up at the Hall of Honors. The time will be 1530-1600 Monday through Friday. If you are not available to pick up, the package will be available the following day at the same time. This will exclude any holidays that may fall during the week. We are attempting to streamline processes. This will allow staff to gather all deliveries received. If you should have any questions, please see staff. Thank you for your kind consideration in this matter.” The letter was signed by the administrator. A concern was raised in that there could be some residents that were nonambulatory that could not carry their packages if they were using a walker or a wheelchair. The directive was in place from 09/14/22 through 10/18/22. The administrator advised that those residents that were nonambulatory would have assistance from the care providers in getting their packages; however, that was not stated in the initial letter. Regulations state in part that residents are to receive unopened correspondence in a prompt manner. Residents were advised that they would be responsible to collect their own packages and therefore may not have received their packages in a prompt manner. Based on LPAs review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) is found to be Substantiated. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22), is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Appeal Rights were explained and provided to the facility representative listed above and an exit interview was conducted.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 17, 2023 · control 25-AS-20221004151723
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(15) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 18, 2023
Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities - To send and receive unopened correspondence in a prompt manner. The licensee did not ensure that this requirement was met as evidenced by a letter that was provided to the residents indicating that they would be responsible to obtain their own packages.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 17, 2023
Plan of correction: On 10/18/22, the administrator changed the policy in that packages were delivered to the residents’ rooms by the care providers. No further plan of correction is required.
20225 state visits · 5 documents
Oct 7, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident requested sun blocking film or shades for their window and the facility has not installed it in resident's room.
/07/2022 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Shannon Diegoruelas, made an unannounced visit to the facility and met with Pamela Eiszele, Administrator for the facility. The purpose of this visit was to deliver the results of the complaint investigation of the above allegations. Prior to initiating the visit, LPA completed required daily self-screening for symptoms of COVID-19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms; contacted administrator and completed a facility risk assessment. LPA ensured they applied hand sanitizer before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: Surgical Mask. Additionally, LPA was screened by security. During the course of the investigation, LPA conducted interviews and obtained documentation pertinent to the investigation. Interview with resident (R1) indicated that they spoke with facility management on multiple occasions requesting sun blocking film or shades be place in their bedroom window and believe they were ignored. Interview with the Administrator indicated that they were not aware of any request being made by R1 for sun blocking film or shades. The facility did not have any work orders prior to the complaint to provide to LPA indicating that a request had been made by R1. The facility opened a work order on 6/16/2022 to tint the windows in R1’s room. As of to date, the facility provided documentation to LPA indicating that the work order was completed on 6/21/2022. Based on interviews conducted, LPA finds the allegation to be UNSUBSTANTIATED, a finding that the complaint is Unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. No deficiencies were cited during today's visit. Exit interview was conducted and a copy of the report was provided to Administrator. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 7, 2022 · control 25-AS-20220606112531
The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 1. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Sep 13, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ruth Wallace conducted an unannounced Required 1- Year Annual Inspection Visit and met with. Prior to initiating the visit, LPA completed required COVID-19 testing protocols, and a daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID-19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms. LPA ensured they applied hand sanitizer before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: surgical mask and gloves. Additionally, LPA was screened by front desk security. LPA Wallace and administrator toured the facility inside and out including but not limited to facility front entrance, living room, resident bathrooms, kitchen area, outside area, outside resident bedrooms, storage rooms, and medication room. All passageways are free of obstruction. LPA observed the smoke/monoxide alarms to be in working order and the fire extinguishers are fully charged which expire 1/24/2023. Facility is conducting quarterly fire drills and the last one was conducted 8/16/2022. The hot water measured 106.3*F which is within the required range of 105-120*F. All staff were observed to be wearing surgical masks. Facility entrance is equipped with proper COVID-19 signage and screening station. Facility has a mitigation plan in place should a COVID positive case occur. Facility has sufficient supply of perishable food, non-perishable food, medication, and PPE. LPA reviewed 6 of 81 resident records and LPA reviewed medications of 2 residents comparing with Centrally Stored Medication Record and physician orders. LPA reviewed 4 staff records and all have health screen and TB results. A review of staff records indicates that all facility staff has received criminal record clearances and/or are associated to this facility. Staff records reviewed all have current first aid certificates. LPA Wallace completed infection control domain and observed no issues or concerns. No deficiencies cited today from California Code of regulations, Title 22. Exit interview conducted with administrator and a copy of report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 13, 2022
Mar 30, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnfounded
Allegation investigated: Facility put substance in resident's beverage
***AMENDED*** This report is being amended from confidential to public. This is the only change to the report. Licensing Program Analyst's (LPA's) Shannon Diegoruelas and Misty Valencia conducted an unannounced complaint visit and met with Pamela Eiszele, Administrator to deliver investigation findings. Prior to initiating the visit, LPA's completed required COVID-19 testing protocols, and a daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID-19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms. LPA's ensured they applied hand sanitizer before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: Surgical masks. Additionally, LPA's was screened by staff at the front door. Continued on 9099C Unfounded The Department finds from interviewing the psychologist and his records review dated 10/25/21, 11/10/21, and 02/10/22 that R1 is diagnosed with: *Severe personality disorder *Borderline personality disorder traits *Maladaptive personality traits *Paranoia psychosis *Delusional ideation/thoughts It was reported by the psychologist that R1 was having a paranoia episode, believing someone put something in his water. It was determined through other interviews with Administrator, staff, and residents that eight of eight (8 of 8) staff and four of five (4 of 5) residents reported they have never heard of or witnessed any issues regarding substances being put into resident's beverages. LPA finds allegation to be without merit or cause. As a result of this investigation, LPA finds allegation to be (U) Unfounded - A finding that the complaint is Unfounded means that the allegation is false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis. An exit interview was conducted and copied of report was emailed to Administratorthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 30, 2022 · control 25-AS-20220208083000
Feb 7, 2022Facility evaluation reportOfficeReport on file
Type of visit: Office
On Febuary 7, 2022, a Non-Compliance Conference was conducted on this day in the Sacramento North Regional Office via Webex, due to COVID 19 precautions. The purpose of this Non-Compliance Conference meeting was to discuss the citations that were issued on 1/20/2022 regarding a COVID-19 outbreak at the facility. Present in the meeting was licensing Program Manager (LPM) Laura Munoz in lieu of Regional Manager (RM) Alycia Berryman, LPM Troy Ordonez, LPA Misty Valencia, and LPA Shannon Diegoruelas, Lori Templeton, Administrator,Pam Eiszele, Administrator,Ron Thoreson, AHH,Rebecca Alexander , Administrator Assistant,Dixie Pridmor, Infection Control officer, Kristi Munson, Quality Assurance,Beth Muszynski, Asst Deputy Secretary,Dan Maullam, Chief Counsel,Tina Ramirez, Human Resources Director and Manny Dumangas, Infection Control officer. The Non-Compliance Conference process was explained during this meeting to include the Covid 19 staff protocols. Issues discussed during the meeting were : -On 12/17/2021, the Sacramento North Regional Office received a report of a new COVID-19 positive staff person via email. -Infection control: facility staff working with symptoms -Not adhering to the Public Health Order (testing visitors, record keeping) -COVID-19 staff screening - clarification regarding following the strictest guidance continued on 809-C The facility has stated they will do the following to achieve continued and substantial compliance: The Department would like the facility to submit the following by: 2/14/22 · A plan on how facility staff will be trained in required areas prior to completing duties: · Plan should include - responsibility will be to conduct training, monitor training and document training. · The Department may increase monitoring at your facility. · Facility will comply with strictest guidance related to COVID-19 · Facility will report all COVID-19 positives within 24 hours by phone or fax, or email. · Facility will provide updated mitigation plan · Submit a Personel Report LIC 500 · Facility will updated staff screening documents that shows no symptoms within forty-eight (48) hours and not four(4) hours Licensee agrees to complete required training for all care staff. The Licensee shall send a list detailing the date and topic of training. · A progress report compliance meeting may be conducted at the end of the six month time period outlined by the Non-Compliance Conference. Per California Code of Regulations (CCRs) - Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, no deficiencies are being cited during this visit. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided via email.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 7, 2022
Jan 3, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Legal/Non-complianceReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Legal/Non-compliance
On 01/03/2022, Jaclyn Avila, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) conducted a case management visit to the facility for the purpose of delivering an Order to Individual of Immediate Exclusion from all facilities and the Order to Licensee/Facility of Immediate Exclusion from Facility. Prior to initiating the visit, LPA completed required COVID-19 testing protocols, and a daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID-19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms. LPA ensured they applied hand sanitizer before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: PAPR. LPA completed the facility screening questionnaire. LPA Avila met with the Administrator Pam Eiszele, Assisted Administrator Ron Thoreson, Kristi Mudson Standards Compliance Coordinator and explained the purpose of today's visit. Angela Metropulos, Staff Person is excluded as of this date 12/31/2021, due to her actions related to this facility. LPA Avila handed the Order to Licensee/Facility of Immediate Exclusion from the Facility and explained that staff person Angela Metropulos cannot be allowed to work, be present and/or live in a Community Care Licensing (CCL) licensed facility or have contact with clients in any residential facility or child day care licensed by the California Department of Social Services. Prior to arriving at the facility, LPA Avila attempted to meet with Angela Metropulos but was unable to make contact to serve the Order to Individual of Immediate Exclusion from all facilities. A copy of this report was provided to the Administrator via e-mail.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 3, 2022
20212 state visits · 2 documents
Sep 28, 2021Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 9/28/21 at 11:30 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cheng conducted an unannounced required 1-year annual inspection and met with Standard Compliance Coordinator Kristi Munsun. Prior to initiating the visit, LPA completed required COVID-19 testing protocols, and a daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID-19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms; contacted Administrator and completed a facility risk assessment. LPA ensured they applied hand sanitizer before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: surgical mask and gloves. Additionally, LPA was screened by front desk security. LPA Cheng toured the facility inside and out including but not limited to facility front entrance, living room, resident bathrooms, kitchen area, outside area, outside resident bedrooms, storage rooms, and medication room. All passageways are free of obstruction. All staff were observed to be wearing surgical masks. Facility entrance is equipped with proper COVID-19 signage and screening station. Facility has a mitigation plan in place should a COVID positive case occur. Facility has sufficient supply of perishable food, non-perishable food, medication, and PPE. LPA Cheng completed infection control domain and observed no issues or concerns. No deficiencies observed. Exit interview conducted and a copy of report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 28, 2021
Jul 7, 2021Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
Donna Gurriere, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a case management visit. LPA Gurriere met with Pamela Eiszele, Administrator and advised of the purpose of the inspection. LPA Gurriere completed the required COVID-19 testing protocols, and a daily self- screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID 19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms. The administrator was contacted to complete a facility risk assessment. LPA Gurriere ensured that hand sanitizer was applied before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: N-95 mask. Additionally, LPA was screened by the receptionist upon entering the facility. During the month of June 2021, it was reported that a resident’s (Resident 1) medications were not accurate. The purpose of this visit is to review a resident’s medications and ensure that the facility is following the physician’s medication orders for the resident. The resident was interviewed and advised that in March 2021 his physician lowered a dosage amount of a medication that he was taking. The resident has requested that the administrator talk to his physician to see if the medication can be increased to assist with a side effect that he is experiencing. The administrator has agreed to speak with the resident's physician to ask if the physician can re-review the resident's medication. The facility staff are currently following the physician's orders of the prescribed medication. During today's visit the administrator scheduled a visit for the resident to see his physician. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the report was given to the administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 7, 2021
81 of 93 beds were occupied at the January 7, 2026 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
California Department of Veterans Affairs, licensed since 2013.
Operates 4 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.
- Veterans Home of California-Fresno · Fresno
- William J. "Pete" Knight Veterans Home-Lancaster · Lancaster
- Veterans Home of California-Ventura · Ventura
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2013, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 15
- Total complaints
- 7
- Substantiated allegations
- 1
- Type A citations
- 0
- Type B citations
- 1
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2013, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 0 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 1 | 1 |
| Substantiated allegations | 1 | 2 |
| Total complaints | 7 | 6 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Veterans Home of California-Redding
Is Veterans Home of California-Redding licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Veterans Home of California-Redding licensed for?
93 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Veterans Home of California-Redding been cited?
0 Type A and 1 Type B citation since 2013, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 15 state visits over the same years.
Is Veterans Home of California-Redding still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.
What does Veterans Home of California-Redding cost?
$5,000 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,900–$6,400. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 communities with 50 or more beds within 25 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 7 other homes of a similar licensed size in Redding that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,774 to $5,469 a month, and the middle figure is $5,095 (n = 7 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Veterans Home of California-Redding take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by California Department of Veterans Affairs, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. See the homes licensed to California Department of Veterans Affairs — at least 4 on the state roster.
Can Veterans Home of California-Redding keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 16 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Veterans Home of California-Redding license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “VETERANS HOME OF CALIFORNIA-REDDING”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #455002486. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 93 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to California Department of Veterans Affairs, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2013, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 15 state inspection visits since 2013, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 1 Type B citation on file since 2013, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 15 state visits in that period.
- 7 complaints and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 2013, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is September 9, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in Shasta County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Typical starting rate
$5,000 a month to start
Typical in Shasta County · likely $3,650–$6,850On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Map
Typical starting rate
$5,000 a month to start
Typical in Shasta County · likely $3,650–$6,850On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Typical starting rate
$5,000 a month to start
Typical in Shasta County · likely $3,650–$6,850On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Typical starting rate
$5,000 a month to start
Typical in Shasta County · likely $3,650–$6,850On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Typical starting rate
$5,000 a month to start
Typical in Shasta County · likely $3,650–$6,850On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Typical starting rate
$5,000 a month to start
Typical in Shasta County · likely $3,650–$6,850On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore Shasta County