Crescent Oaks is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Sunnyvale, Santa Clara County, California — state license #435202705, with a licensed capacity of 44, listed as closed, change of ownership in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 27 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated April 9, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.
The state record lists this licence as “Closed, Change of Ownership”. A closed licence cannot admit residents. We keep closed licences published because “is this place licensed?” deserves an honest answer.
No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.
Since 2021, the state has visited this home 30 times and filed 27 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated April 9, 2026.
The state's published file for this home includes 14 documents with transcribed findings, dated February 16, 2024 to December 1, 2025. 14 of the 14 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2), “Unfounded” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (10). 14 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.
Summary composed by computer from the 14 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
What the state’s words mean
Apr 9, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Mar 5, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Feb 18, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Dec 1, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: - Staff failed to prevent client from pushing another client
LPA Jeung met with resident care coordinator and acting administrator, interviewed staff, and reviewed client files and staff training records. Copies of relevant documents are provided. An incident occurred on 10/31/25--and Unusual Incident Reports were submitted to CCLD, reporting that client #1 pushed client #2 to the floor, sustaining a closed head injury. Names of staff involved were not included in Report; this information is provided to LPA today. On that day, there were 4 caregivers on work schedule, plus a med tech and housekeeper. LPA interviewed 3 staff who worked on 10/31/25. Staff were unable to prevent client from harming another resident. When client's adverse behavior was observed, staff reacted appropriately to intervene and try to prevent anyone from harm. Based on review of facility and other reports and interviews with staff, this allegation is determined to be unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have occurred or is valid, there is not enough evidence to prthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 1, 2025 · control 26-AS-20251121154338
Oct 29, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: - Facility staff did not prevent resident from hitting another resident
Based on review of facility and other reports and interviews with staff, this allegation is determined to be unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have occurred or is valid, there is not enough evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Despite at least ten documented incidents involving client #2 as the instigator of threatening, aggressive or combattive behaviors within 60 days, staff were unable to prevent client from harming another resident. When client's adverse behavior was observed, staff reacted appropriately to intervene and try to prevent anyone from harm. However, client did not have a dedicated caregiver to provide 24/7 supervision. During this investigation, deficiencies of the CA Code of REgulations, Title 22 were observed. See separate FAcility Evaluation Report. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 29, 2025 · control 26-AS-20251017113320
Oct 29, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Oct 22, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Aug 11, 2025Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure incontinence care is provided in a timely manner Staff do not ensure residents are kept clean and dry
On 8/11/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Grace Donato conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to deliver the findings. LPA met with Adminstrator Joshua Lambengco and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegations of staff do not ensure incontinence care is provided in a timely manner and staff do not ensure residents are kept clean and dry, RP stated that when he/she has gone down to visit R1 on multiple occasions, RP has found R1 in triple diapers and soaked through in his/her linens. During the interviews, S2 stated that R1 pees a lot so they put double diapers because sometimes R1 takes it off. When R1 takes off the one in the front then there’s another one under. R1 is also hard to get up and bring to the bathroom. It’s easier for them. page 1 of 2 Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 11, 2025 · control 26-AS-20240619104312
Jul 31, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not dispense medication to residents as prescribed Staff did not assist resident with eating
On July31, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kiran Jain arrived at the facility to deliver the findings of a Complaint Investigation. Upon arrival, the LPA was greeted by the Resident Care Coordinator (RCC), Bernadette Kang. The LPA disclosed the purpose of the visit. On 05/05/2025, the department received a complaint with the above two (2) allegations. On 5/12/2025 and 07/08/2025, the department conducted initial investigations at the facility. Regarding the allegation ‘Staff did not dispense medication to residents as prescribed’, the Reporting Party (RP) alleged that the staff did not give R1 and R2 the prescribed pain medication. On 05/12/2025 and 07/08/2025, LPA interviewed six (6) staff members (S1-S3 and S5-S7) and two (2) residents (R3 and R4). Continued on LIC9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 31, 2025 · control 26-AS-20250505103401
Jul 31, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not assist resident with feeding resulting in weight loss
On July31, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kiran Jain arrived at the facility to deliver the findings of a Complaint Investigation. Upon arrival, the LPA was greeted by the Resident Care Coordinator (RCC), Bernadette Kang. The LPA disclosed the purpose of the visit. On 05/23/2025, the department received a complaint with the above one (1) allegation. On 5/28/2025, the department conducted initial investigations at the facility. Regarding the allegation ‘Facility staff did not assist resident with feeding resulting in weight loss’, the Reporting Party (RP) alleged that the R1 was not given food, R1 was hungry, and R1 had been losing weight. On 05/28/2025 and 07/08/2025, LPA interviewed three (3) staff members (S2, S5, and S6), and three (3) residents (R3, R4, and R5). Continued on LIC9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 31, 2025 · control 26-AS-20250523161929
May 15, 2025Unfounded
Allegation investigated: Staff camouflaged residents’ medication Staff did not ensure call assistance buttons in residents’ rooms were operable
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Simi Rai conducted an unannounced visit to conclude the complaint investigation. LPA Rai met with the Administrator and stated the purpose of today’s visit. On 5/10/2024, the Department received a complaint with the above allegations. On 5/20/2024, the Department conducted an initial investigation at the facility. Continuation on LIC 9099-C, Page 1 of 3. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 15, 2025 · control 26-AS-20240510105333
May 9, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Feb 24, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Jan 10, 2025Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure the elevator is working properly
On January 10, 2025, at 8:45 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kiran Jain arrived at the facility to conduct a Complaint Investigation visit. Upon arrival, the LPA was greeted by the Activities Director (AD), Geraldine Sabado. The LPA disclosed the purpose of the inspection. The AD informed the LPA that there were (35) residents in care. Regarding the allegation “Staff do not ensure the elevator is working properly”, the Reporting Party (RP) stated “The elevator has not been working for weeks. The management does not seem to be in a hurry to fix it.”. LPA interviewed (1) Resident (R1). R1 was observed to be sitting in the lobby area along with other (6) residents of the 2nd floor. R1 stated that elevator had been broken for about (2) weeks, right after Christmas and most of the residents had to stay upstairs and had not been able to leave the 2nd floor. Continued on 9099-C Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 10, 2025 · control 26-AS-20250107125539
Nov 7, 2024Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: . Administrator is not on the premises a sufficient number of hours to meet the needs of the residents. 2. Staff are not following infection control practices. 3. Staff are not adhering to proper hand washing practices. 4. Staff do not provide resident with hand washing soap. 5. Staff do not respond to resident's request for assistance.
On 11/07/2024 Licensing Program Analyst (LPAs) Kiran Jain and Grace Donato conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit and met with Resident Care Coordinator Bernadette Kang. LPAs explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation that the Administrator is not on the premises a sufficient number of hours to meet the needs of the residents, there is no contact information for the Reporting Party (RP), hence LPA was unable to get more details about this allegation. Based on the staff (S1-S4) interviews conducted on 10/15/2024 with four staff members, , the Administrator (S4) is at the facility for 4 hours per day and in S4’s absence the Resident Care Coordinator (S3) and Med tech (S1) acts as manager on duty. Based on the resident (R1) interview conducted on 10/15/2024, R1 stated that they are satisfied with the Administrator at the facility. Page 1 of 4... Continued on LIC9099-C... Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 7, 2024 · control 26-AS-20241007092911
Oct 30, 2024Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff are not ensuring a safe environment for residents in care. Staff are mismanaging resident's medications. Staff are not ensuring that residents are administered their medications as prescribed. Staff are not regularly informing resident's representatives of information related to the care or services for residents in care. Staff are not ensuring that residents have a reasonable ability to receive confidential calls. Staff are not reporting incidents involving residents as required. Staff yell at residents in care.
On 10/30/24, LPA Grace Donato conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit. LPA met with Administrator Joshua Lambengco and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegations that staff are not ensuring a safe environment for residents in care, staff are not regularly informing resident's representatives of information related to the care or services for residents in care and staff are not reporting incidents involving residents as required, reporting party (RP) stated that ADM keeps information about the care and supervision of residents from loved ones, and misleads them about the resident's care and experiences. ADM doesn't want people to know what is really going on at this facility. Some of the residents that are allowed to live in this facility are very combative and are harassing other residents. For example, about 2 months ago a resident hit another resident which caused a bruise on their shoulder. This incident (and other incidents) was never reported to athe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 30, 2024 · control 26-AS-20230509114956
Aug 13, 2024Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Lack of supervision resulting in resident to resident altercation.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David Marrufo conducted a complaint investigation visit and met with Joshua Lambengco, Administrator (ADM). On 04/30/2024, the Department received a complaint with the above allegation. An initial complaint investigation visit was conducted on 05/09/2024. During visit, LPA Marrufo conducted interviews and obtained copies of resident records. LPA Marrufo requested a police report from local law enforcement on 05/06/2024 using the police report case number provided by the complainant. Local law enforcement responded to LPA Marrufo’s request on 05/06/2024 and stated there was no police report with the provided police report case number. See LIC9099-C for more information. Page 1 of 3. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 13, 2024 · control 26-AS-20240430095729
Aug 13, 2024Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide adequate food service Staff don't respond to residents' call assistance button promptly
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David Marrufo conducted an unannounced compliant investigation visit and met with Joshua Lambengco, Administrator (ADM). On 06/03/2024, the Department received a complaint with the above allegations. LPA Marrufo conducted an initial complaint investigation visit on 06/05/2024. The Department cross-reported the complaint to local law enforcement. On 06/04/2024, the Department conducted a telephone interview with a police officer from local law enforcement who visited and toured the facility on 06/04/2024. The police officer stated to have toured the kitchen and observed the refrigerator and observed food of good quality. The police officer stated to have viewed the facility menus and records and was able to see residents being served special diets. See LIC9099-C for more information. Page 1 of 3. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 13, 2024 · control 26-AS-20240603132838
Aug 1, 2024Unfounded
Allegation investigated: Facility did not provide supervision to resident in care, resulting to altercation between residents
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christine Dolores arrived unannounced to open the initial complaint investigation. LPA met with Resident Care Coordinator, Bernadette Kang. On 07/25/2024, the Department received a complaint alleging that the facility did not provide supervision to resident (R1) and (R2) resulting in an altercation between residents. On 08/01/2024, the initial complaint investigation was conducted. The following documents were obtained for this investigation to include the staff schedule, resident (R1) – (R2)’s physician’s report, service plan, progress notes, and incident reports. SEE LIC9099-C. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 1, 2024 · control 26-AS-20240725150151
May 31, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
May 9, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Feb 16, 2024Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Insufficient staffing to meet resident needs
On 2/16/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Grace Donato conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for the above allegation. LPA met with Administrator Ollie Vance. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation of insufficient staffing to meet residents’ needs. Reporting party (RP) called about staffing shortage. RP also mentioned that the temporary staff from the agency were sometimes nowhere to be found. LPA Ng conducted interviews with different staff members. Three out of seven staff members interviewed stated that there are occasions where there is insufficient staffing. One staff member, S1, mentioned that usually there were agency staff on duty to help the regulars. But sometimes the agency staff came one to two hours late. Sometimes not showing up at all. There were times that the caregivers could not finish the tasks on time. Another staff member, S2, stated that the management tried to get the agency staff, but no agency staff came though. It was sthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 16, 2024 · control 26-AS-20210816135004
Feb 16, 2024Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Insufficient staffing to meet resident needs
On 2/16/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Grace Donato conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for the above allegation. LPA met with Administrator Ollie Vance. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation of insufficient staffing to meet resident needs, the reporting party (RP) stated that August 21, 2021, he/she walked into the facility and there were two caregivers for thirty-two residents. LPA Ng conducted interviews with staff members and four out of four mentioned that there is not insufficient staffing in the facility. Two of these staff members, S1 & S2, stated that there are always four caregivers scheduled in a shift. S1 also mentioned that if a staff calls in, management will call the agency to send a replacement. Usually, the replacement could come on time if the staff calls in earlier. Another staff member, S3, mentioned that Med-Techs act as managers on weekends when there is no manager on duty. LPA Donato also observed the facility to bethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 16, 2024 · control 26-AS-20210824115113
Feb 13, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Year-by-year trend
Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.
Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →
No Google listing is on file for this home. When one exists, its rating, review themes, and hours appear here — attributed to Google, never blended with the state record, and never part of how we rank homes.
This home hasn’t added its own details yet. When the operator claims this page, their photos, tour video, activities, languages, and staffing answers appear here — always labeled as theirs, never blended with the state record. Operators: claim your home, free →
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Is Crescent Oaks licensed?
No — not currently. The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists Crescent Oaks in Sunnyvale (Santa Clara County), California license #435202705, as “Closed, Change Of Ownership”, formerly licensed for 44 residents. State records list 27 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated April 9, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.
Can Crescent Oaks care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?
From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.
The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Crescent Oaks with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and hospice care; it does not list dementia / memory care and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.
From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.
What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 44 NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 10 RESIDENTS.
How much does Crescent Oaks cost?
California's public licensing record does not include Crescent Oaks's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Santa Clara County typically runs $6,000–$9,000/mo and small board-and-care homes $5,000–$8,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.
Does Crescent Oaks accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?
Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Crescent Oaks through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.
Medi-Cal / ALW homes in Santa Clara County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →
38 of 44 beds occupied (86%) when the state visited on October 29, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.
What do state inspections show for Crescent Oaks?
Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.
The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 30 state visits and 27 dated documents since 2021 for Crescent Oaks; 14 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated December 1, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated”. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.
Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.
2025
2024
Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.
What the state has logged
California has logged 30 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.
You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.
(408) 730-4004Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.
Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →
See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →
This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →
Do you run Crescent Oaks? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.