Crescent Oaks is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Sunnyvale, Santa Clara County, California — state license #435202705, with a licensed capacity of 44, listed as closed, change of ownership in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 27 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated April 9, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

255 homes in view

Crescent Oaks

The state record lists this licence as “Closed, Change of Ownership”. A closed licence cannot admit residents. We keep closed licences published because “is this place licensed?” deserves an honest answer.

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Mid-size home, 44 residents · Sunnyvale, CA · Santa Clara County
Closed in state recordWheelchairHospiceMemory care not on fileBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days · we confirm by phone before any referral
License #435202705, held since 2019 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
147 Crescent Ave · Sunnyvale, Santa Clara County
Phone
(408) 730-4004
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 44 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 10 residents
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 44 NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 10 RESIDENTS.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 30 times and filed 27 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated April 9, 2026.

Most recent state visit
April 9, 2026
Occupancy at the October 29, 2025 visit
38 of 44 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 14 documents with transcribed findings, dated February 16, 2024 to December 1, 2025. 14 of the 14 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2), “Unfounded” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (10). 14 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 14 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 24 of 27 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20263 state visits · 3 documents
Apr 9, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 5, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 18, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20259 state visits · 11 documents
Dec 1, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: - Staff failed to prevent client from pushing another client

LPA Jeung met with resident care coordinator and acting administrator, interviewed staff, and reviewed client files and staff training records. Copies of relevant documents are provided. An incident occurred on 10/31/25--and Unusual Incident Reports were submitted to CCLD, reporting that client #1 pushed client #2 to the floor, sustaining a closed head injury. Names of staff involved were not included in Report; this information is provided to LPA today. On that day, there were 4 caregivers on work schedule, plus a med tech and housekeeper. LPA interviewed 3 staff who worked on 10/31/25. Staff were unable to prevent client from harming another resident. When client's adverse behavior was observed, staff reacted appropriately to intervene and try to prevent anyone from harm. Based on review of facility and other reports and interviews with staff, this allegation is determined to be unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have occurred or is valid, there is not enough evidence to prthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 1, 2025 · control 26-AS-20251121154338
Oct 29, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: - Facility staff did not prevent resident from hitting another resident

Based on review of facility and other reports and interviews with staff, this allegation is determined to be unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have occurred or is valid, there is not enough evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Despite at least ten documented incidents involving client #2 as the instigator of threatening, aggressive or combattive behaviors within 60 days, staff were unable to prevent client from harming another resident. When client's adverse behavior was observed, staff reacted appropriately to intervene and try to prevent anyone from harm. However, client did not have a dedicated caregiver to provide 24/7 supervision. During this investigation, deficiencies of the CA Code of REgulations, Title 22 were observed. See separate FAcility Evaluation Report. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 29, 2025 · control 26-AS-20251017113320
Oct 29, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 22, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 11, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure incontinence care is provided in a timely manner Staff do not ensure residents are kept clean and dry

On 8/11/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Grace Donato conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to deliver the findings. LPA met with Adminstrator Joshua Lambengco and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegations of staff do not ensure incontinence care is provided in a timely manner and staff do not ensure residents are kept clean and dry, RP stated that when he/she has gone down to visit R1 on multiple occasions, RP has found R1 in triple diapers and soaked through in his/her linens. During the interviews, S2 stated that R1 pees a lot so they put double diapers because sometimes R1 takes it off. When R1 takes off the one in the front then there’s another one under. R1 is also hard to get up and bring to the bathroom. It’s easier for them. page 1 of 2 Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 11, 2025 · control 26-AS-20240619104312
Jul 31, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not dispense medication to residents as prescribed Staff did not assist resident with eating

On July31, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kiran Jain arrived at the facility to deliver the findings of a Complaint Investigation. Upon arrival, the LPA was greeted by the Resident Care Coordinator (RCC), Bernadette Kang. The LPA disclosed the purpose of the visit. On 05/05/2025, the department received a complaint with the above two (2) allegations. On 5/12/2025 and 07/08/2025, the department conducted initial investigations at the facility. Regarding the allegation ‘Staff did not dispense medication to residents as prescribed’, the Reporting Party (RP) alleged that the staff did not give R1 and R2 the prescribed pain medication. On 05/12/2025 and 07/08/2025, LPA interviewed six (6) staff members (S1-S3 and S5-S7) and two (2) residents (R3 and R4). Continued on LIC9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 31, 2025 · control 26-AS-20250505103401
Jul 31, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not assist resident with feeding resulting in weight loss

On July31, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kiran Jain arrived at the facility to deliver the findings of a Complaint Investigation. Upon arrival, the LPA was greeted by the Resident Care Coordinator (RCC), Bernadette Kang. The LPA disclosed the purpose of the visit. On 05/23/2025, the department received a complaint with the above one (1) allegation. On 5/28/2025, the department conducted initial investigations at the facility. Regarding the allegation ‘Facility staff did not assist resident with feeding resulting in weight loss’, the Reporting Party (RP) alleged that the R1 was not given food, R1 was hungry, and R1 had been losing weight. On 05/28/2025 and 07/08/2025, LPA interviewed three (3) staff members (S2, S5, and S6), and three (3) residents (R3, R4, and R5). Continued on LIC9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 31, 2025 · control 26-AS-20250523161929
May 15, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff camouflaged residents’ medication Staff did not ensure call assistance buttons in residents’ rooms were operable

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Simi Rai conducted an unannounced visit to conclude the complaint investigation. LPA Rai met with the Administrator and stated the purpose of today’s visit. On 5/10/2024, the Department received a complaint with the above allegations. On 5/20/2024, the Department conducted an initial investigation at the facility. Continuation on LIC 9099-C, Page 1 of 3. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 15, 2025 · control 26-AS-20240510105333
May 9, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 24, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 10, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure the elevator is working properly

On January 10, 2025, at 8:45 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kiran Jain arrived at the facility to conduct a Complaint Investigation visit. Upon arrival, the LPA was greeted by the Activities Director (AD), Geraldine Sabado. The LPA disclosed the purpose of the inspection. The AD informed the LPA that there were (35) residents in care. Regarding the allegation “Staff do not ensure the elevator is working properly”, the Reporting Party (RP) stated “The elevator has not been working for weeks. The management does not seem to be in a hurry to fix it.”. LPA interviewed (1) Resident (R1). R1 was observed to be sitting in the lobby area along with other (6) residents of the 2nd floor. R1 stated that elevator had been broken for about (2) weeks, right after Christmas and most of the residents had to stay upstairs and had not been able to leave the 2nd floor. Continued on 9099-C Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 10, 2025 · control 26-AS-20250107125539
20248 state visits · 10 documents
Nov 7, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: . Administrator is not on the premises a sufficient number of hours to meet the needs of the residents. 2. Staff are not following infection control practices. 3. Staff are not adhering to proper hand washing practices. 4. Staff do not provide resident with hand washing soap. 5. Staff do not respond to resident's request for assistance.

On 11/07/2024 Licensing Program Analyst (LPAs) Kiran Jain and Grace Donato conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit and met with Resident Care Coordinator Bernadette Kang. LPAs explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation that the Administrator is not on the premises a sufficient number of hours to meet the needs of the residents, there is no contact information for the Reporting Party (RP), hence LPA was unable to get more details about this allegation. Based on the staff (S1-S4) interviews conducted on 10/15/2024 with four staff members, , the Administrator (S4) is at the facility for 4 hours per day and in S4’s absence the Resident Care Coordinator (S3) and Med tech (S1) acts as manager on duty. Based on the resident (R1) interview conducted on 10/15/2024, R1 stated that they are satisfied with the Administrator at the facility. Page 1 of 4... Continued on LIC9099-C... Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 7, 2024 · control 26-AS-20241007092911
Oct 30, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not ensuring a safe environment for residents in care. Staff are mismanaging resident's medications. Staff are not ensuring that residents are administered their medications as prescribed. Staff are not regularly informing resident's representatives of information related to the care or services for residents in care. Staff are not ensuring that residents have a reasonable ability to receive confidential calls. Staff are not reporting incidents involving residents as required. Staff yell at residents in care.

On 10/30/24, LPA Grace Donato conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit. LPA met with Administrator Joshua Lambengco and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegations that staff are not ensuring a safe environment for residents in care, staff are not regularly informing resident's representatives of information related to the care or services for residents in care and staff are not reporting incidents involving residents as required, reporting party (RP) stated that ADM keeps information about the care and supervision of residents from loved ones, and misleads them about the resident's care and experiences. ADM doesn't want people to know what is really going on at this facility. Some of the residents that are allowed to live in this facility are very combative and are harassing other residents. For example, about 2 months ago a resident hit another resident which caused a bruise on their shoulder. This incident (and other incidents) was never reported to athe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 30, 2024 · control 26-AS-20230509114956
Aug 13, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Lack of supervision resulting in resident to resident altercation.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David Marrufo conducted a complaint investigation visit and met with Joshua Lambengco, Administrator (ADM). On 04/30/2024, the Department received a complaint with the above allegation. An initial complaint investigation visit was conducted on 05/09/2024. During visit, LPA Marrufo conducted interviews and obtained copies of resident records. LPA Marrufo requested a police report from local law enforcement on 05/06/2024 using the police report case number provided by the complainant. Local law enforcement responded to LPA Marrufo’s request on 05/06/2024 and stated there was no police report with the provided police report case number. See LIC9099-C for more information. Page 1 of 3. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 13, 2024 · control 26-AS-20240430095729
Aug 13, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide adequate food service Staff don't respond to residents' call assistance button promptly

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David Marrufo conducted an unannounced compliant investigation visit and met with Joshua Lambengco, Administrator (ADM). On 06/03/2024, the Department received a complaint with the above allegations. LPA Marrufo conducted an initial complaint investigation visit on 06/05/2024. The Department cross-reported the complaint to local law enforcement. On 06/04/2024, the Department conducted a telephone interview with a police officer from local law enforcement who visited and toured the facility on 06/04/2024. The police officer stated to have toured the kitchen and observed the refrigerator and observed food of good quality. The police officer stated to have viewed the facility menus and records and was able to see residents being served special diets. See LIC9099-C for more information. Page 1 of 3. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 13, 2024 · control 26-AS-20240603132838
Aug 1, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Facility did not provide supervision to resident in care, resulting to altercation between residents

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christine Dolores arrived unannounced to open the initial complaint investigation. LPA met with Resident Care Coordinator, Bernadette Kang. On 07/25/2024, the Department received a complaint alleging that the facility did not provide supervision to resident (R1) and (R2) resulting in an altercation between residents. On 08/01/2024, the initial complaint investigation was conducted. The following documents were obtained for this investigation to include the staff schedule, resident (R1) – (R2)’s physician’s report, service plan, progress notes, and incident reports. SEE LIC9099-C. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 1, 2024 · control 26-AS-20240725150151
May 31, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 9, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 16, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Insufficient staffing to meet resident needs

On 2/16/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Grace Donato conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for the above allegation. LPA met with Administrator Ollie Vance. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation of insufficient staffing to meet residents’ needs. Reporting party (RP) called about staffing shortage. RP also mentioned that the temporary staff from the agency were sometimes nowhere to be found. LPA Ng conducted interviews with different staff members. Three out of seven staff members interviewed stated that there are occasions where there is insufficient staffing. One staff member, S1, mentioned that usually there were agency staff on duty to help the regulars. But sometimes the agency staff came one to two hours late. Sometimes not showing up at all. There were times that the caregivers could not finish the tasks on time. Another staff member, S2, stated that the management tried to get the agency staff, but no agency staff came though. It was sthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 16, 2024 · control 26-AS-20210816135004
Feb 16, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Insufficient staffing to meet resident needs

On 2/16/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Grace Donato conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for the above allegation. LPA met with Administrator Ollie Vance. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation of insufficient staffing to meet resident needs, the reporting party (RP) stated that August 21, 2021, he/she walked into the facility and there were two caregivers for thirty-two residents. LPA Ng conducted interviews with staff members and four out of four mentioned that there is not insufficient staffing in the facility. Two of these staff members, S1 & S2, stated that there are always four caregivers scheduled in a shift. S1 also mentioned that if a staff calls in, management will call the agency to send a replacement. Usually, the replacement could come on time if the staff calls in earlier. Another staff member, S3, mentioned that Med-Techs act as managers on weekends when there is no manager on duty. LPA Donato also observed the facility to bethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 16, 2024 · control 26-AS-20210824115113
Feb 13, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations1typical 1
Type B citations3typical 1
Substantiated complaints4typical 2
Total complaints15typical 7
State visits on file30typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2019.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20263302025911220248100202311020221102021110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$6,000$9,000 /mo
our estimate — Santa Clara County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one.
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home is on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →

Is Crescent Oaks licensed?

No — not currently. The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists Crescent Oaks in Sunnyvale (Santa Clara County), California license #435202705, as “Closed, Change Of Ownership, formerly licensed for 44 residents. State records list 27 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated April 9, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Crescent Oaks care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Crescent Oaks with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and hospice care; it does not list dementia / memory care and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 44 NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 10 RESIDENTS.

How much does Crescent Oaks cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Crescent Oaks's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Santa Clara County typically runs $6,000–$9,000/mo and small board-and-care homes $5,000–$8,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Crescent Oaks accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Crescent Oaks through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.

Medi-Cal / ALW homes in Santa Clara County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

38 of 44 beds occupied (86%) when the state visited on October 29, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Crescent Oaks?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 30 state visits and 27 dated documents since 2021 for Crescent Oaks; 14 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated December 1, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

14 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed- Staff failed to prevent client from pushing another client
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
LPA Jeung met with resident care coordinator and acting administrator, interviewed staff, and reviewed client files and staff training records. Copies of relevant documents are provided. An incident occurred on 10/31/25--and Unusual Incident Reports were submitted to CCLD, reporting that client #1 pushed client #2 to the floor, sustaining a closed head injury. Names of staff involved were not included in Report; this information is provided to LPA today. On that day, there were 4 caregivers on work schedule, plus a med tech and housekeeper. LPA interviewed 3 staff who worked on 10/31/25. Staff were unable to prevent client from harming another resident. When client's adverse behavior was observed, staff reacted appropriately to intervene and try to prevent anyone from harm. Based on review of facility and other reports and interviews with staff, this allegation is determined to be unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have occurred or is valid, there is not enough evidence to prCDSS inspection report, December 1, 2025 · control 26-AS-20251121154338
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed- Facility staff did not prevent resident from hitting another resident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Based on review of facility and other reports and interviews with staff, this allegation is determined to be unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have occurred or is valid, there is not enough evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Despite at least ten documented incidents involving client #2 as the instigator of threatening, aggressive or combattive behaviors within 60 days, staff were unable to prevent client from harming another resident. When client's adverse behavior was observed, staff reacted appropriately to intervene and try to prevent anyone from harm. However, client did not have a dedicated caregiver to provide 24/7 supervision. During this investigation, deficiencies of the CA Code of REgulations, Title 22 were observed. See separate FAcility Evaluation Report. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 29, 2025 · control 26-AS-20251017113320
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not ensure incontinence care is provided in a timely manner Staff do not ensure residents are kept clean and dry
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 8/11/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Grace Donato conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to deliver the findings. LPA met with Adminstrator Joshua Lambengco and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegations of staff do not ensure incontinence care is provided in a timely manner and staff do not ensure residents are kept clean and dry, RP stated that when he/she has gone down to visit R1 on multiple occasions, RP has found R1 in triple diapers and soaked through in his/her linens. During the interviews, S2 stated that R1 pees a lot so they put double diapers because sometimes R1 takes it off. When R1 takes off the one in the front then there’s another one under. R1 is also hard to get up and bring to the bathroom. It’s easier for them. page 1 of 2 SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 11, 2025 · control 26-AS-20240619104312
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not dispense medication to residents as prescribed Staff did not assist resident with eating
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On July31, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kiran Jain arrived at the facility to deliver the findings of a Complaint Investigation. Upon arrival, the LPA was greeted by the Resident Care Coordinator (RCC), Bernadette Kang. The LPA disclosed the purpose of the visit. On 05/05/2025, the department received a complaint with the above two (2) allegations. On 5/12/2025 and 07/08/2025, the department conducted initial investigations at the facility. Regarding the allegation ‘Staff did not dispense medication to residents as prescribed’, the Reporting Party (RP) alleged that the staff did not give R1 and R2 the prescribed pain medication. On 05/12/2025 and 07/08/2025, LPA interviewed six (6) staff members (S1-S3 and S5-S7) and two (2) residents (R3 and R4). Continued on LIC9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 31, 2025 · control 26-AS-20250505103401
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not assist resident with feeding resulting in weight loss
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On July31, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kiran Jain arrived at the facility to deliver the findings of a Complaint Investigation. Upon arrival, the LPA was greeted by the Resident Care Coordinator (RCC), Bernadette Kang. The LPA disclosed the purpose of the visit. On 05/23/2025, the department received a complaint with the above one (1) allegation. On 5/28/2025, the department conducted initial investigations at the facility. Regarding the allegation ‘Facility staff did not assist resident with feeding resulting in weight loss’, the Reporting Party (RP) alleged that the R1 was not given food, R1 was hungry, and R1 had been losing weight. On 05/28/2025 and 07/08/2025, LPA interviewed three (3) staff members (S2, S5, and S6), and three (3) residents (R3, R4, and R5). Continued on LIC9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 31, 2025 · control 26-AS-20250523161929
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff camouflaged residents’ medication Staff did not ensure call assistance buttons in residents’ rooms were operable
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Simi Rai conducted an unannounced visit to conclude the complaint investigation. LPA Rai met with the Administrator and stated the purpose of today’s visit. On 5/10/2024, the Department received a complaint with the above allegations. On 5/20/2024, the Department conducted an initial investigation at the facility. Continuation on LIC 9099-C, Page 1 of 3. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, May 15, 2025 · control 26-AS-20240510105333
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not ensure the elevator is working properly
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On January 10, 2025, at 8:45 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kiran Jain arrived at the facility to conduct a Complaint Investigation visit. Upon arrival, the LPA was greeted by the Activities Director (AD), Geraldine Sabado. The LPA disclosed the purpose of the inspection. The AD informed the LPA that there were (35) residents in care. Regarding the allegation “Staff do not ensure the elevator is working properly”, the Reporting Party (RP) stated “The elevator has not been working for weeks. The management does not seem to be in a hurry to fix it.”. LPA interviewed (1) Resident (R1). R1 was observed to be sitting in the lobby area along with other (6) residents of the 2nd floor. R1 stated that elevator had been broken for about (2) weeks, right after Christmas and most of the residents had to stay upstairs and had not been able to leave the 2nd floor. Continued on 9099-C SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 10, 2025 · control 26-AS-20250107125539

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed. Administrator is not on the premises a sufficient number of hours to meet the needs of the residents. 2. Staff are not following infection control practices. 3. Staff are not adhering to proper hand washing practices. 4. Staff do not provide resident with hand washing soap. 5. Staff do not respond to resident's request for assistance.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 11/07/2024 Licensing Program Analyst (LPAs) Kiran Jain and Grace Donato conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit and met with Resident Care Coordinator Bernadette Kang. LPAs explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation that the Administrator is not on the premises a sufficient number of hours to meet the needs of the residents, there is no contact information for the Reporting Party (RP), hence LPA was unable to get more details about this allegation. Based on the staff (S1-S4) interviews conducted on 10/15/2024 with four staff members, , the Administrator (S4) is at the facility for 4 hours per day and in S4’s absence the Resident Care Coordinator (S3) and Med tech (S1) acts as manager on duty. Based on the resident (R1) interview conducted on 10/15/2024, R1 stated that they are satisfied with the Administrator at the facility. Page 1 of 4... Continued on LIC9099-C... UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, November 7, 2024 · control 26-AS-20241007092911
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not ensuring a safe environment for residents in care. Staff are mismanaging resident's medications. Staff are not ensuring that residents are administered their medications as prescribed. Staff are not regularly informing resident's representatives of information related to the care or services for residents in care. Staff are not ensuring that residents have a reasonable ability to receive confidential calls. Staff are not reporting incidents involving residents as required. Staff yell at residents in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 10/30/24, LPA Grace Donato conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit. LPA met with Administrator Joshua Lambengco and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegations that staff are not ensuring a safe environment for residents in care, staff are not regularly informing resident's representatives of information related to the care or services for residents in care and staff are not reporting incidents involving residents as required, reporting party (RP) stated that ADM keeps information about the care and supervision of residents from loved ones, and misleads them about the resident's care and experiences. ADM doesn't want people to know what is really going on at this facility. Some of the residents that are allowed to live in this facility are very combative and are harassing other residents. For example, about 2 months ago a resident hit another resident which caused a bruise on their shoulder. This incident (and other incidents) was never reported to aCDSS inspection report, October 30, 2024 · control 26-AS-20230509114956
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLack of supervision resulting in resident to resident altercation.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David Marrufo conducted a complaint investigation visit and met with Joshua Lambengco, Administrator (ADM). On 04/30/2024, the Department received a complaint with the above allegation. An initial complaint investigation visit was conducted on 05/09/2024. During visit, LPA Marrufo conducted interviews and obtained copies of resident records. LPA Marrufo requested a police report from local law enforcement on 05/06/2024 using the police report case number provided by the complainant. Local law enforcement responded to LPA Marrufo’s request on 05/06/2024 and stated there was no police report with the provided police report case number. See LIC9099-C for more information. Page 1 of 3. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 13, 2024 · control 26-AS-20240430095729
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not provide adequate food service Staff don't respond to residents' call assistance button promptly
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David Marrufo conducted an unannounced compliant investigation visit and met with Joshua Lambengco, Administrator (ADM). On 06/03/2024, the Department received a complaint with the above allegations. LPA Marrufo conducted an initial complaint investigation visit on 06/05/2024. The Department cross-reported the complaint to local law enforcement. On 06/04/2024, the Department conducted a telephone interview with a police officer from local law enforcement who visited and toured the facility on 06/04/2024. The police officer stated to have toured the kitchen and observed the refrigerator and observed food of good quality. The police officer stated to have viewed the facility menus and records and was able to see residents being served special diets. See LIC9099-C for more information. Page 1 of 3. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 13, 2024 · control 26-AS-20240603132838
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not provide supervision to resident in care, resulting to altercation between residents
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christine Dolores arrived unannounced to open the initial complaint investigation. LPA met with Resident Care Coordinator, Bernadette Kang. On 07/25/2024, the Department received a complaint alleging that the facility did not provide supervision to resident (R1) and (R2) resulting in an altercation between residents. On 08/01/2024, the initial complaint investigation was conducted. The following documents were obtained for this investigation to include the staff schedule, resident (R1) – (R2)’s physician’s report, service plan, progress notes, and incident reports. SEE LIC9099-C. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, August 1, 2024 · control 26-AS-20240725150151
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedInsufficient staffing to meet resident needs
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 2/16/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Grace Donato conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for the above allegation. LPA met with Administrator Ollie Vance. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation of insufficient staffing to meet residents’ needs. Reporting party (RP) called about staffing shortage. RP also mentioned that the temporary staff from the agency were sometimes nowhere to be found. LPA Ng conducted interviews with different staff members. Three out of seven staff members interviewed stated that there are occasions where there is insufficient staffing. One staff member, S1, mentioned that usually there were agency staff on duty to help the regulars. But sometimes the agency staff came one to two hours late. Sometimes not showing up at all. There were times that the caregivers could not finish the tasks on time. Another staff member, S2, stated that the management tried to get the agency staff, but no agency staff came though. It was sCDSS inspection report, February 16, 2024 · control 26-AS-20210816135004
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedInsufficient staffing to meet resident needs
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 2/16/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Grace Donato conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for the above allegation. LPA met with Administrator Ollie Vance. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation of insufficient staffing to meet resident needs, the reporting party (RP) stated that August 21, 2021, he/she walked into the facility and there were two caregivers for thirty-two residents. LPA Ng conducted interviews with staff members and four out of four mentioned that there is not insufficient staffing in the facility. Two of these staff members, S1 & S2, stated that there are always four caregivers scheduled in a shift. S1 also mentioned that if a staff calls in, management will call the agency to send a replacement. Usually, the replacement could come on time if the staff calls in earlier. Another staff member, S3, mentioned that Med-Techs act as managers on weekends when there is no manager on duty. LPA Donato also observed the facility to beCDSS inspection report, February 16, 2024 · control 26-AS-20210824115113

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 30 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
1
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
3
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
4
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
15
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
30
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(408) 730-4004
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Crescent Oaks? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.