Ivy Park At Palo Alto is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Palo Alto, Santa Clara County, California — state license #435202623, with a licensed capacity of 97, listed as closed, change of ownership in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 18 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated August 27, 2025 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

255 homes in view

Ivy Park At Palo Alto

The state record lists this licence as “Closed, Change of Ownership”. A closed licence cannot admit residents. We keep closed licences published because “is this place licensed?” deserves an honest answer.

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 97 residents · Palo Alto, CA · Santa Clara County
Closed in state recordWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days · we confirm by phone before any referral
License #435202623, held since 2018 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
2701 El Camino Real · Palo Alto, Santa Clara County
Phone
(703) 273-7500
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 97 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 18 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 10 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. ALL MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. DEMENTIA SPECIAL CARE. SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 18 RESIDENTS. FIRE CLEARANCE GRANTED FOR 10 BEDRIDDEN. APPROVED DELAYED EGRESS.NEW MGMT.CO, OAKMONT MANAGEMENT GROUP LLC, EFF 7/1/23.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 17 times and filed 18 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on August 27, 2025 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

Most recent state visit
August 27, 2025
Occupancy at that visit
79 of 0 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 12 documents with transcribed findings, dated October 7, 2021 to August 27, 2025. 12 of the 12 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (11). 12 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 12 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 12 of 18 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20252 state visits · 2 documents
Aug 27, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff are not safeguarding belongings of resident(s)

On 08/27/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kiran Jain arrived unannounced at the facility to deliver and discuss the findings of the Complaint allegations and investigation. Upon arrival, the LPA met with the Executive Director, Stephanie Brice, and disclosed the purpose of the visit. On 06/16/2025, the department received a complaint with one (1) allegation ‘Facility staff are not safeguarding belongings of resident(s)’. On 06/20/2025, 08/12/2025, and 08/21/2025, the department conducted initial investigations at the facility. On 06/20/2025, 08/12/2025, 08/21/2025, and 08/26/2025, LPA interviewed five (5) staff members (ED, S1-S4), nine (9) residents (R1-R9), and R10’s Primary Emergency Contact (PEC). Continued on LIC9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 27, 2025 · control 26-AS-20250616122012
Mar 27, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff administered the incorrect medication resulting in a resident's hospitalization

On March 27, 2025, at 2:20 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kiran Jain arrived at the facility to deliver the findings of a Complaint Investigation. Upon arrival, the LPA was greeted by the Executive Director (ED), Stephanie Brice. The LPA disclosed the purpose of the inspection. The ED informed the LPA that there were (66) residents in care. Regarding the allegation “Staff administered the incorrect medication resulting in a resident's hospitalization”, the Reporting Party (RP) stated “R1 returned to the facility from skilled nursing, and their updated medication list was not sent to the pharmacy causing the staff to administer the wrong medication to the resident. RP reported that the facility administered a medication to the resident that R1 was no longer taking causing severe low blood glucose. RP reported that on 02/17/25, the resident had to be transported to the hospital and was admitted to the ICU. Continued on LIC9099-C Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 27, 2025 · control 26-AS-20250219092649
20246 state visits · 8 documents
Dec 5, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure residents care plan is properly followed Staff did not observe changes in residents health condition in a timely manner Staff are not assisting resident with administration of medication

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David Marrufo conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit and met with Stephanie Brice, Administrator. On 07/08/2024, the Department received a complaint with the above allegations. On 07/16/2024, LPA Marrufo conducted an initial complaint investigation visit. Resident R1’s Service Plan states R1 requires medication assistance and requires monitoring of weight gain or loss once per week. During interview on 07/16/2024, resident R1 stated that R1 uses a scale to check R1’s weight and records R1’s weight every day in a handwritten log. LPA observed R1’s handwritten daily weight log. R1 stated that R1’s weight scale has not been broken. See LIC9099-C for more information. Page 1 of 3. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 5, 2024 · control 26-AS-20240708100511
Dec 5, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident is being financially abused Facility did not safeguard resident's personal belongings

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David Marrufo conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit and met with Stephanie Brice, Administrator. On 06/26/2023, the Department received a complaint with the above allegation. On 06/30/2023, the Department conducted an initial complaint investigation visit. Throughout the investigation, the Department interviewed residents R1-R2, 2 family members of R1-R2, and 8 staff. LPA Marrufo attempted telephone interviews with 2 other staff but was unable to reach them. LPA Marrufo also obtained copies of R1 and R2’s resident records, LIC624 Incident Report, Theft and Loss Policy, LIC621 Client/Resident Personal Property and Valuables form, Emergency Contact Information Forms, and Progress Notes See LIC9099-C for more information. Page 1 of 3. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 5, 2024 · control 26-AS-20230626112634
Dec 5, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 15, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 7, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident is being neglected due to bruisings.

On 11/07/2024 Licensing Program Analyst (LPAs) Kiran Jain and Grace Donato conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit and met with Executive Director, Chris Schuster. LPAs explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegations that the Resident is being neglected due to bruisings, the reporting Party (RP) mentioned that they received a call from a Stanford Hospital Social Worker regarding bruising. Client is a fall risk, has dementia and oriented to person only at baseline. Client had bruising on their right toe, and right cheek bone area that looked consistent with a fall. Client has daytime one-to-one care, but no overnight care. The facility is not sure how the fall occurred as it was unwitnessed. Client's family member reported to the hospital that client has history of falls and had no concerns about the skilled facility's care of client. Client was transported to the hospital the week prior to 10/17/24 for a fall that required stitches from a laceration on theithe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 7, 2024 · control 26-AS-20241024162149
Nov 1, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: . The facility did not assist in providing care with activities of daily living. 2. The facility did not consistently observe changes and address resident's physical, mental, emotional, or social functioning and did not provide appropriate assistance in response to these changes. 3. The facility did not provide adequate supervision or ensure proper assistance with the administration of medication.

On 11/01/2024, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Kiran Jain and Grace Donato conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit and met with Health Services Director Baneen Amiri. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegations that the facility did not assist in providing care with activities of daily living, The facility did not consistently observe changes and address resident's physical, mental, emotional, or social functioning and did not provide appropriate assistance in response to these changes, and the facility did not provide adequate supervision or ensure proper assistance with the administration of medication, the reporting Party (RP) mentioned that Client (R1) has not showered in an unknown amount of time and the home is in disarray. The client has schizoaffective disorder and has not taken her medication in several months. RP attempted to contact the Client and she is very incoherent. RP attempted to evaluate Client for a psychiatric hold, but the Clthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 1, 2024 · control 26-AS-20241004120232
Sep 6, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff physically manhandled the resident that caused bruising on the left forearm. Staff hit resident while in care.

On 9/6/24 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Grace Donato conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit and met with Health Services Director Baneen Amiri. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegations of staff physically manhandled the resident that caused bruising on the left forearm and staff hit resident while in care, Reporting Party (RP) mentioned that resident R1 stated that he/she was hit by the staff, and they were roughly handling him/her while getting ready for the day. Per RP, R1 stated staff squeezed his/her left arm and R1 hit the caregiver because of the pain he/she was experiencing and in turn the caregiver hit R1 back on the left forearm. Per RP the squeezing and hitting caused R1 to bruise on the left forearm. con't .... Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 6, 2024 · control 26-AS-20231211152500
Aug 28, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20232 state visits · 2 documents
Oct 25, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 18, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff drink alcohol while working at the facility Staff did not provide adequate mobility assistance to resident in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David Marrufo conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit and met with Andrew Pence. During visit, LPA Marrufo toured the garage storage rooms and areas, employee lounge room, and facility kitchen. LPA Marrufo did not observe any alcoholic drink in those areas except for bottles and boxes of alcohol in the facility pantry. LPA Marrufo interviewed staff S1-S11 and residents R1-R6. Staff S1 stated during interview that the facility serves alcohol to residents upon request and if the resident is able to drink alcohol. S1 stated the pantry is locked once meals are done being served. See LIC9099-C for more information. Page 1 of 2. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 18, 2023 · control 26-AS-20231012133153
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations1typical 1
Type B citations0typical 1
Substantiated complaints1typical 2
Total complaints10typical 7
State visits on file17typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2018.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20252212024680202344020221102021330
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$6,000$9,000 /mo
our estimate — Santa Clara County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one.
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →

Is Ivy Park At Palo Alto licensed?

No — not currently. The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists Ivy Park At Palo Alto in Palo Alto (Santa Clara County), California license #435202623, as “Closed, Change Of Ownership, formerly licensed for 97 residents. State records list 18 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated August 27, 2025, was marked “Unsubstantiated” by the state.

Can Ivy Park At Palo Alto care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Ivy Park At Palo Alto with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. ALL MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. DEMENTIA SPECIAL CARE. SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 18 RESIDENTS. FIRE CLEARANCE GRANTED FOR 10 BEDRIDDEN. APPROVED DELAYED EGRESS.NEW MGMT.CO, OAKMONT MANAGEMENT GROUP LLC, EFF 7/1/23.

How much does Ivy Park At Palo Alto cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Ivy Park At Palo Alto's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Santa Clara County typically runs $6,000–$9,000/mo and small board-and-care homes $5,000–$8,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Ivy Park At Palo Alto accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Ivy Park At Palo Alto is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

79 of 0 beds occupied (0%) when the state visited on August 27, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Ivy Park At Palo Alto?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 17 state visits and 18 dated documents since 2021 for Ivy Park At Palo Alto; 12 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated August 27, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

12 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff are not safeguarding belongings of resident(s)
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 08/27/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kiran Jain arrived unannounced at the facility to deliver and discuss the findings of the Complaint allegations and investigation. Upon arrival, the LPA met with the Executive Director, Stephanie Brice, and disclosed the purpose of the visit. On 06/16/2025, the department received a complaint with one (1) allegation ‘Facility staff are not safeguarding belongings of resident(s)’. On 06/20/2025, 08/12/2025, and 08/21/2025, the department conducted initial investigations at the facility. On 06/20/2025, 08/12/2025, 08/21/2025, and 08/26/2025, LPA interviewed five (5) staff members (ED, S1-S4), nine (9) residents (R1-R9), and R10’s Primary Emergency Contact (PEC). Continued on LIC9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 27, 2025 · control 26-AS-20250616122012
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff administered the incorrect medication resulting in a resident's hospitalization
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On March 27, 2025, at 2:20 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kiran Jain arrived at the facility to deliver the findings of a Complaint Investigation. Upon arrival, the LPA was greeted by the Executive Director (ED), Stephanie Brice. The LPA disclosed the purpose of the inspection. The ED informed the LPA that there were (66) residents in care. Regarding the allegation “Staff administered the incorrect medication resulting in a resident's hospitalization”, the Reporting Party (RP) stated “R1 returned to the facility from skilled nursing, and their updated medication list was not sent to the pharmacy causing the staff to administer the wrong medication to the resident. RP reported that the facility administered a medication to the resident that R1 was no longer taking causing severe low blood glucose. RP reported that on 02/17/25, the resident had to be transported to the hospital and was admitted to the ICU. Continued on LIC9099-C SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 27, 2025 · control 26-AS-20250219092649

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not ensure residents care plan is properly followed Staff did not observe changes in residents health condition in a timely manner Staff are not assisting resident with administration of medication
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David Marrufo conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit and met with Stephanie Brice, Administrator. On 07/08/2024, the Department received a complaint with the above allegations. On 07/16/2024, LPA Marrufo conducted an initial complaint investigation visit. Resident R1’s Service Plan states R1 requires medication assistance and requires monitoring of weight gain or loss once per week. During interview on 07/16/2024, resident R1 stated that R1 uses a scale to check R1’s weight and records R1’s weight every day in a handwritten log. LPA observed R1’s handwritten daily weight log. R1 stated that R1’s weight scale has not been broken. See LIC9099-C for more information. Page 1 of 3. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 5, 2024 · control 26-AS-20240708100511
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident is being financially abused Facility did not safeguard resident's personal belongings
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David Marrufo conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit and met with Stephanie Brice, Administrator. On 06/26/2023, the Department received a complaint with the above allegation. On 06/30/2023, the Department conducted an initial complaint investigation visit. Throughout the investigation, the Department interviewed residents R1-R2, 2 family members of R1-R2, and 8 staff. LPA Marrufo attempted telephone interviews with 2 other staff but was unable to reach them. LPA Marrufo also obtained copies of R1 and R2’s resident records, LIC624 Incident Report, Theft and Loss Policy, LIC621 Client/Resident Personal Property and Valuables form, Emergency Contact Information Forms, and Progress Notes See LIC9099-C for more information. Page 1 of 3. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 5, 2024 · control 26-AS-20230626112634
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident is being neglected due to bruisings.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 11/07/2024 Licensing Program Analyst (LPAs) Kiran Jain and Grace Donato conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit and met with Executive Director, Chris Schuster. LPAs explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegations that the Resident is being neglected due to bruisings, the reporting Party (RP) mentioned that they received a call from a Stanford Hospital Social Worker regarding bruising. Client is a fall risk, has dementia and oriented to person only at baseline. Client had bruising on their right toe, and right cheek bone area that looked consistent with a fall. Client has daytime one-to-one care, but no overnight care. The facility is not sure how the fall occurred as it was unwitnessed. Client's family member reported to the hospital that client has history of falls and had no concerns about the skilled facility's care of client. Client was transported to the hospital the week prior to 10/17/24 for a fall that required stitches from a laceration on theiCDSS inspection report, November 7, 2024 · control 26-AS-20241024162149
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed. The facility did not assist in providing care with activities of daily living. 2. The facility did not consistently observe changes and address resident's physical, mental, emotional, or social functioning and did not provide appropriate assistance in response to these changes. 3. The facility did not provide adequate supervision or ensure proper assistance with the administration of medication.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 11/01/2024, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Kiran Jain and Grace Donato conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit and met with Health Services Director Baneen Amiri. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegations that the facility did not assist in providing care with activities of daily living, The facility did not consistently observe changes and address resident's physical, mental, emotional, or social functioning and did not provide appropriate assistance in response to these changes, and the facility did not provide adequate supervision or ensure proper assistance with the administration of medication, the reporting Party (RP) mentioned that Client (R1) has not showered in an unknown amount of time and the home is in disarray. The client has schizoaffective disorder and has not taken her medication in several months. RP attempted to contact the Client and she is very incoherent. RP attempted to evaluate Client for a psychiatric hold, but the ClCDSS inspection report, November 1, 2024 · control 26-AS-20241004120232
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff physically manhandled the resident that caused bruising on the left forearm. Staff hit resident while in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 9/6/24 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Grace Donato conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit and met with Health Services Director Baneen Amiri. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegations of staff physically manhandled the resident that caused bruising on the left forearm and staff hit resident while in care, Reporting Party (RP) mentioned that resident R1 stated that he/she was hit by the staff, and they were roughly handling him/her while getting ready for the day. Per RP, R1 stated staff squeezed his/her left arm and R1 hit the caregiver because of the pain he/she was experiencing and in turn the caregiver hit R1 back on the left forearm. Per RP the squeezing and hitting caused R1 to bruise on the left forearm. con't .... UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 6, 2024 · control 26-AS-20231211152500

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff drink alcohol while working at the facility Staff did not provide adequate mobility assistance to resident in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David Marrufo conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit and met with Andrew Pence. During visit, LPA Marrufo toured the garage storage rooms and areas, employee lounge room, and facility kitchen. LPA Marrufo did not observe any alcoholic drink in those areas except for bottles and boxes of alcohol in the facility pantry. LPA Marrufo interviewed staff S1-S11 and residents R1-R6. Staff S1 stated during interview that the facility serves alcohol to residents upon request and if the resident is able to drink alcohol. S1 stated the pantry is locked once meals are done being served. See LIC9099-C for more information. Page 1 of 2. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 18, 2023 · control 26-AS-20231012133153
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not follow physician orders. Staff did not meet supervision needs of residents. Staff did not assist residents with activities of daily living. Staff did not assist residents with basic services. Staff did not provide meals of the quality or quantity to meet the needs of residents. Residents were not accorded dignity. Facility is not kept clean.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
LPA Marrufo conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit and met with Kathleen Olson. On 03/18/2021, the Department received a complaint with the above allegations. On 03/25/2021, the Department conducted an intial complaint investigation visit and conducted further visits on 03/29/2021, 06/30/2023, and 07/06/2023. LPA Marrufo interviewed 8 residents, including R1, 3 resident responsible parties (for 3 out of the 8 interviewed residents who were from memory care), 10 care giver staff, and 3 kitchen staff. R1’s Physician’s Report from 11/27/2019 indicated R1 has a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Dementia. The Physician’s Report indicates R1 is able to bathe self, dress/groom self, able to follow instructions, and able to communicate needs. The Physician’s Report indicates R1 is ambulatory. See LIC9099-C for more information. Page 1 of 8. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 6, 2023 · control 26-AS-20210318093226
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained a fracture while in care Resident is not receiving appropriate catheter care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David Marrufo conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit and met with Fatima Vicente-Dimanlig, Resident Care Director. On 03/25/2020, the Department received the complaint with the above allegations. On 03/27/2020, LPA Marrufo conducted the initial complaint investigation visit. An Incident Report filed by the facility on 03/24/2020 states that resident R1 was seen by the nurse on duty after R1’s fall on 03/22/2020. The Incident Report states R1 reported having 3/10 pain on R1’s right ankle. An assessment was done and there was noted to be discoloration on R1’s right ankle area. 911 was called for further assessment. Paramedics were unable to determine if R1’s right foot was fractured. R1 initially refused to go to the emergency room, but eventually requested to be taken. R1’s Progress Notes from 03/22/2020 state that at 7:08 AM, staff were trying to assist R1 from R1’s bed to R1’s wheelchair. R1 reported that R1’s knees were feeling weak andCDSS inspection report, June 22, 2023 · control 26-AS-20200325172553

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 17 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
1
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
1
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
10
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
17
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(703) 273-7500
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Ivy Park At Palo Alto? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.