Ivy Park At Palo Alto is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Palo Alto, Santa Clara County, California — state license #435202623, with a licensed capacity of 97, listed as closed, change of ownership in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 18 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated August 27, 2025 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.
The state record lists this licence as “Closed, Change of Ownership”. A closed licence cannot admit residents. We keep closed licences published because “is this place licensed?” deserves an honest answer.
No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.
Since 2021, the state has visited this home 17 times and filed 18 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on August 27, 2025 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”
The state's published file for this home includes 12 documents with transcribed findings, dated October 7, 2021 to August 27, 2025. 12 of the 12 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (11). 12 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.
Summary composed by computer from the 12 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
What the state’s words mean
Aug 27, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility staff are not safeguarding belongings of resident(s)
On 08/27/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kiran Jain arrived unannounced at the facility to deliver and discuss the findings of the Complaint allegations and investigation. Upon arrival, the LPA met with the Executive Director, Stephanie Brice, and disclosed the purpose of the visit. On 06/16/2025, the department received a complaint with one (1) allegation ‘Facility staff are not safeguarding belongings of resident(s)’. On 06/20/2025, 08/12/2025, and 08/21/2025, the department conducted initial investigations at the facility. On 06/20/2025, 08/12/2025, 08/21/2025, and 08/26/2025, LPA interviewed five (5) staff members (ED, S1-S4), nine (9) residents (R1-R9), and R10’s Primary Emergency Contact (PEC). Continued on LIC9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 27, 2025 · control 26-AS-20250616122012
Mar 27, 2025Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff administered the incorrect medication resulting in a resident's hospitalization
On March 27, 2025, at 2:20 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kiran Jain arrived at the facility to deliver the findings of a Complaint Investigation. Upon arrival, the LPA was greeted by the Executive Director (ED), Stephanie Brice. The LPA disclosed the purpose of the inspection. The ED informed the LPA that there were (66) residents in care. Regarding the allegation “Staff administered the incorrect medication resulting in a resident's hospitalization”, the Reporting Party (RP) stated “R1 returned to the facility from skilled nursing, and their updated medication list was not sent to the pharmacy causing the staff to administer the wrong medication to the resident. RP reported that the facility administered a medication to the resident that R1 was no longer taking causing severe low blood glucose. RP reported that on 02/17/25, the resident had to be transported to the hospital and was admitted to the ICU. Continued on LIC9099-C Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 27, 2025 · control 26-AS-20250219092649
Dec 5, 2024Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure residents care plan is properly followed Staff did not observe changes in residents health condition in a timely manner Staff are not assisting resident with administration of medication
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David Marrufo conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit and met with Stephanie Brice, Administrator. On 07/08/2024, the Department received a complaint with the above allegations. On 07/16/2024, LPA Marrufo conducted an initial complaint investigation visit. Resident R1’s Service Plan states R1 requires medication assistance and requires monitoring of weight gain or loss once per week. During interview on 07/16/2024, resident R1 stated that R1 uses a scale to check R1’s weight and records R1’s weight every day in a handwritten log. LPA observed R1’s handwritten daily weight log. R1 stated that R1’s weight scale has not been broken. See LIC9099-C for more information. Page 1 of 3. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 5, 2024 · control 26-AS-20240708100511
Dec 5, 2024Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident is being financially abused Facility did not safeguard resident's personal belongings
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David Marrufo conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit and met with Stephanie Brice, Administrator. On 06/26/2023, the Department received a complaint with the above allegation. On 06/30/2023, the Department conducted an initial complaint investigation visit. Throughout the investigation, the Department interviewed residents R1-R2, 2 family members of R1-R2, and 8 staff. LPA Marrufo attempted telephone interviews with 2 other staff but was unable to reach them. LPA Marrufo also obtained copies of R1 and R2’s resident records, LIC624 Incident Report, Theft and Loss Policy, LIC621 Client/Resident Personal Property and Valuables form, Emergency Contact Information Forms, and Progress Notes See LIC9099-C for more information. Page 1 of 3. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 5, 2024 · control 26-AS-20230626112634
Dec 5, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Nov 15, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Nov 7, 2024Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident is being neglected due to bruisings.
On 11/07/2024 Licensing Program Analyst (LPAs) Kiran Jain and Grace Donato conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit and met with Executive Director, Chris Schuster. LPAs explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegations that the Resident is being neglected due to bruisings, the reporting Party (RP) mentioned that they received a call from a Stanford Hospital Social Worker regarding bruising. Client is a fall risk, has dementia and oriented to person only at baseline. Client had bruising on their right toe, and right cheek bone area that looked consistent with a fall. Client has daytime one-to-one care, but no overnight care. The facility is not sure how the fall occurred as it was unwitnessed. Client's family member reported to the hospital that client has history of falls and had no concerns about the skilled facility's care of client. Client was transported to the hospital the week prior to 10/17/24 for a fall that required stitches from a laceration on theithe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 7, 2024 · control 26-AS-20241024162149
Nov 1, 2024Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: . The facility did not assist in providing care with activities of daily living. 2. The facility did not consistently observe changes and address resident's physical, mental, emotional, or social functioning and did not provide appropriate assistance in response to these changes. 3. The facility did not provide adequate supervision or ensure proper assistance with the administration of medication.
On 11/01/2024, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Kiran Jain and Grace Donato conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit and met with Health Services Director Baneen Amiri. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegations that the facility did not assist in providing care with activities of daily living, The facility did not consistently observe changes and address resident's physical, mental, emotional, or social functioning and did not provide appropriate assistance in response to these changes, and the facility did not provide adequate supervision or ensure proper assistance with the administration of medication, the reporting Party (RP) mentioned that Client (R1) has not showered in an unknown amount of time and the home is in disarray. The client has schizoaffective disorder and has not taken her medication in several months. RP attempted to contact the Client and she is very incoherent. RP attempted to evaluate Client for a psychiatric hold, but the Clthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 1, 2024 · control 26-AS-20241004120232
Sep 6, 2024Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff physically manhandled the resident that caused bruising on the left forearm. Staff hit resident while in care.
On 9/6/24 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Grace Donato conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit and met with Health Services Director Baneen Amiri. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegations of staff physically manhandled the resident that caused bruising on the left forearm and staff hit resident while in care, Reporting Party (RP) mentioned that resident R1 stated that he/she was hit by the staff, and they were roughly handling him/her while getting ready for the day. Per RP, R1 stated staff squeezed his/her left arm and R1 hit the caregiver because of the pain he/she was experiencing and in turn the caregiver hit R1 back on the left forearm. Per RP the squeezing and hitting caused R1 to bruise on the left forearm. con't .... Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 6, 2024 · control 26-AS-20231211152500
Aug 28, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Oct 25, 2023Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Oct 18, 2023Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff drink alcohol while working at the facility Staff did not provide adequate mobility assistance to resident in care
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David Marrufo conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit and met with Andrew Pence. During visit, LPA Marrufo toured the garage storage rooms and areas, employee lounge room, and facility kitchen. LPA Marrufo did not observe any alcoholic drink in those areas except for bottles and boxes of alcohol in the facility pantry. LPA Marrufo interviewed staff S1-S11 and residents R1-R6. Staff S1 stated during interview that the facility serves alcohol to residents upon request and if the resident is able to drink alcohol. S1 stated the pantry is locked once meals are done being served. See LIC9099-C for more information. Page 1 of 2. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 18, 2023 · control 26-AS-20231012133153
Year-by-year trend
Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.
No Google listing is on file for this home. When one exists, its rating, review themes, and hours appear here — attributed to Google, never blended with the state record, and never part of how we rank homes.
This home hasn’t added its own details yet. When the operator claims this page, their photos, tour video, activities, languages, and staffing answers appear here — always labeled as theirs, never blended with the state record. Operators: claim your home, free →
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Is Ivy Park At Palo Alto licensed?
No — not currently. The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists Ivy Park At Palo Alto in Palo Alto (Santa Clara County), California license #435202623, as “Closed, Change Of Ownership”, formerly licensed for 97 residents. State records list 18 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated August 27, 2025, was marked “Unsubstantiated” by the state.
Can Ivy Park At Palo Alto care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?
From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.
The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Ivy Park At Palo Alto with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.
From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.
What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. ALL MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. DEMENTIA SPECIAL CARE. SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 18 RESIDENTS. FIRE CLEARANCE GRANTED FOR 10 BEDRIDDEN. APPROVED DELAYED EGRESS.NEW MGMT.CO, OAKMONT MANAGEMENT GROUP LLC, EFF 7/1/23.
How much does Ivy Park At Palo Alto cost?
California's public licensing record does not include Ivy Park At Palo Alto's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Santa Clara County typically runs $6,000–$9,000/mo and small board-and-care homes $5,000–$8,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.
Does Ivy Park At Palo Alto accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?
Ivy Park At Palo Alto is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.
Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →
79 of 0 beds occupied (0%) when the state visited on August 27, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.
What do state inspections show for Ivy Park At Palo Alto?
Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.
The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 17 state visits and 18 dated documents since 2021 for Ivy Park At Palo Alto; 12 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated August 27, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated”. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.
Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.
2025
2024
2023
Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.
What the state has logged
California has logged 17 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.
You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.
(703) 273-7500Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.
Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →
See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →
This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →
Do you run Ivy Park At Palo Alto? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.