Small home · Licensed for 6 · Campbell
West Valley Care Home
15 Darryl Drive, Campbell, CA 95008Licensed since 2016
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 5 residents
- Dementia
- Hospiceup to 1 resident
- Bedriddenup to 1 resident
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 5 NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 1.
983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
Care services
These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.
Incontinence care
Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 1 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation on file
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for West Valley Care Home: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight and help with medicines. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
This home’s starting rate
$3,000a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026
Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$3,000likely a month
Starting monthly rate$3,000this home
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,000–$3,600
- $3,000
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,000–$7,150
- $5,500
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes22 nearby homes publish starting rates of $3,000 to $8,500
22 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,400–$6,000.
- Sakura Gardens VillaCampbell · 1.2 mi · Mid-size home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Golden Shore Care HomeSan Jose · 1.2 mi · Small home$8,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Princess LodgeCampbell · 1.3 mi · Mid-size home$5,700Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Shamrock Residential Care HomeCampbell · 1.4 mi · Small home$3,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Caring Hearts Senior Care HomeSan Jose · 1.7 mi · Mid-size home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Bon Homie SaratogaSaratoga · 1.7 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Venetian Residential CareSan Jose · 1.7 mi · Small home$3,200Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Bed of Roses Residential Care HomeCampbell · 1.9 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Mina's Elderly Care Home @ VasonaLos Gatos · 1.9 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Palm Villas, CampbellCampbell · 1.9 mi · Mid-size home$6,400Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Mina's Elderly Care Home 3Campbell · 1.9 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Esther's Residential Care HomeCampbell · 2.0 mi · Small home$3,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Jessie Court Care HomeSan Jose · 2.1 mi · Small home$4,200Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Roxbury Elderly CareLos Gatos · 2.2 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Dry Creek Guest HomeSan Jose · 2.3 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Kimberly's Elder Kare KottageSan Jose · 2.3 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Cherish Senior Care HomeSan Jose · 2.6 mi · Small home$4,200Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Pruneridge Residential Care Home, Facility #2San Jose · 2.8 mi · Small home$3,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- College ManorSan Jose · 2.8 mi · Small home$3,700Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Juliet Stephen Rest HomeSan Jose · 2.9 mi · Small home$4,200Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Country Style LivingSanta Clara · 2.9 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Ambrosia Senior CareSan Jose · 3.0 mi · Small home$4,200Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.
The best way to see it is a visit.
Request a tourWhere it is
15 Darryl Drive, Campbell, CA 95008Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- El Camino Health Los GatosHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list1.7 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #435202536 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 7 of 12 documents
20261 state visit · 1 document
Jan 28, 2026Facility evaluation reportPOCReport on file
Type of visit: POC
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marcella Tarin conducted an unannounced Plan of Correction (POC) visit to follow up on a deficiency cited on 12/26/2025. LPA met with Licensee Biao Zhang and stated the purpose of the visit. The facility was cited the following Type A Deficiency on 12/26/2025: 87468.2(a)(4) Additional Personal Rights of Residents in Privately Operated Facilities,POC due 12/27/2025 The POC was submitted to CCL on 12/27/2025. A Letter of Deficiencies Citations Cleared was provided to Licensee during today's visit. No deficiencies were cited during today's visit per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 28, 2026
20254 state visits · 4 documents
Dec 26, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency page: Type A
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marcella Tarin conducted an unannounced case management visit to amend a report on 10/9/2025 and re-issue the correct citation and $500 civil penalty for an elopement of Resident R1 that occurred on March 29th, 2025. On April 1, 2025, LPA Tarin interviewed Licensee Zhang. Licensee stated, R1 was found on 3/31/2025 and they do not know where R1 was found. Licensee states he heard from R1's responsible party that R1 was found on Stevens Creek Blvd near a gas station, but does not know the condition of R1. Licensee states R1 was last seen on facility surveillance on 3/29/2025 at 7:21AM. On April 1, 2025, at approximately 4:32pm, local law enforcement was informed R1 was found at Stevens Creek Blvd and Cypress Ave. The Department reviewed R1’s physician’s report dated September 8, 2023, which states R1 is not able to leave the facility unassisted. Based on a Google Maps Review, the location R1 was found was 2.9 miles from the facility, without staff supervision. A Deficiency is being cited under Title 22 Regulation 87468.2(a)(4) Additional Personal Rights of Residents in Privately Operated Facilities, see LIC809D for more information. As a result, An immediate civil penalty of $500.00 is being assessed against the facility today for violation the absence of supervision, which resulted in R1 eloping from the facility. Licensee stated he was being treated unfairly by the Department and refused to sign the reports. LPA explained to Licensee that his signature of the report acknowledged receipt of the report. Licensee states he would not sign the report and would be appealing the deficiency and civil penalty. A deficiency is being cited during today's visit, see LIC809D. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee. A copy of this report and appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 26, 2025
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87468.2(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 27, 2025
87468.2(a)(4) Additional Personal Rights of Residents in Privately Operated Facilities (a) (4)To care, supervision, and services that meet their individual needs and are delivered by staff that are sufficient in numbers, qualifications, and competency to meet their needs. This was not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above. Resident R1 eloped from the facility on 3/29/2025. R1 is unable to leave the facility unassisted which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 26, 2025
Plan of correction: Licensee states he will submit a plan to address R1's elopement behavior to CCLD by POC due date by 12/27/2025.
Oct 16, 2025Facility evaluation reportPOCReport on file
Type of visit: POC
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marcella Tarin conducted an unannounced Plan of Correction (POC) visit to follow up on deficiencies issued during the facility's annual inspection on 10/9/2025. LPA met with Licensee Biao Zhang, LPA stated the purpose of the visit. Clearing pending Plan of Corrections: The facility was cited the following deficiencies on 10/9/2025 with the following POC dates: 87202(a) Fire Clearance-Type A-POC due date 10/10/2025 87307(d)(6)-Personal Accommodations and Services-Type A-POC due date 10/10/2025 87309(a)-Storage Space and Access-Type A-POC due date 10/10/2025 1569.625(b)(2) Other Provisions-Type A-POC due date 10/10/2025 87468.1(a)(2) Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities- Type A- POC due date 10/10/2025 87405(d)(2) Administrator Qualifications and Duties-Type A-POC due date 10/10/2025 87303(a)-Maintenance and Operation-Type A-due date 10/10/2025 87465(a)(4)-incidental Medical and Dental Care-Type A-due date 10/10/2025 During review of POCs with Licensee, LPA observed Licensee inadvertently did not not submit the POC for 87405(d)(2) Administrator Qualifications and Duties. Licensee stated he did not realize the POC was not in the POCs when submitted on 10/10/2025. Licensee provided LPA with the POC for 87405(d)(2) during visit. A Letter of Deficiency Citations Cleared was provided to Licensee during visit. During todays visit, LPA toured the facility, and observed the side gate no longer had a lock. LPA observed the facility had cleaned away cobwebs and dirt from resident windows, cleaned brown spots off walls, and the living room couch to have a couch cover. No deficiencies cited during today's visit per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee Biao Zhang, and a signed copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 16, 2025
Oct 9, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Marcella Tarin and Manuel Monter conducted an unannounced annual inspection and to follow up on a resident elopement that occurred in March 2025. LPAs met with Licensee Biao Zhang. LPAs stated the purpose of the visit. LPAs toured the interior and exterior of the facility with Licensee to include the kitchen, resident rooms, dining room, bathrooms, back and front of the facility. During tour of the interior and exterior of the facility, LPAs observed spiderwebs around residents windows, dirt on residents interior windows,a ripped and torn couch in living room, brown stains on walls through the facility. LPAs also observed two office rooms being used as a resident and staff room. LPAs observed a bed and personal belongs in each 'office' room. LPAs observed medication bottles in 'family room', accessible to residents. During inspection of the backyard facility, LPAs observed a gate that had a lock. Licensee states some residents are not allowed to exit the facility. During visit, Licensee removed the lock from the gate. LPAs observed all other exits and passageways to be free and clear of obstruction. LPAs toured the kitchen area and observed a perishable food supply of at least two days and a non-perishable food supply of at least seven days. LPA measured refrigerator temperature at 35 degrees F and Freezer at 0 degrees F. Page 1 of 2 LPAs observed the medication storage area, knives storage area, and cleaning product storage area as locked and inaccessible to residents in care. The facility was equipped with smoke and carbon monoxide detectors. All smoke detectors functioned properly when tested by Licensee. Fire extinguishers were last serviced on 2/11/2025. The facility emergency drill log was reviewed. The facility's last drill was on 9/18/2025. LPAs toured 6 resident bedrooms. All 6 resident rooms have a bed, functioning lights, dresser/table, bedding and space for personal belongings. During inspection of R2's, LPAs observed pills in a cup on R2's dresser. Based on review of R2's physician's report, R2 cannot store or administer his/her own medications. LPAs toured 2 bathrooms. All 2 bathrooms had hand soap, paper towels, functioning lights, and covered trash bins. LPAs measured water temperature with a range of 109 F to 111.5 F. LPAs reviewed 3 resident records. All 3 resident records did not have an updated physician's report, updated service plan, and did not contain personal property log. LPAs reviewed 3 resident’s Centrally Stored Medication and Destruction Records (CSMDR’s). LPAs reviewed 2 staff records. 1 Out of 2 staff records did not have training for 2025. Licensee provided LPAs with a training document for S2 with dated 2025. Upon further review, LPAs observed a handwritten 2025 over the 2024 dates. Licensee stated S2 did not have training for 2025 and apologized for writing 2025 over the 2024 training dates. Elopement incident On April 1, 2025, the Department received an incident Report regarding resident R1. The incident Report stated, on March 29, 2025, resident R1 was missing. R1 was last seen on 3/28/2025, at 11:45pm, by another resident. The incident report states, the facility contacted Campbell police. The incident report states "Based on the surveillance camera record, there was a movement when the sensor light went on at 4:52AM on 3/29/2025" Page 2 of 3 **This is an amended report to issue the correct citation and civil penalty for an elopement** On April 1, 2025, LPA Tarin interviewed Licensee Zhang. Licensee stated, R1 was found on 3/31/2025 and they do not know where R1 was found. Licensee states he heard from R1's responsible party that R1 was found on Stevens Creek Blvd near a gas station, but does not know the condition of R1. Licensee states R1 was last seen on facility surveillance on 3/29/2025 at 7:21AM. On March 29, 2025, Local Law enforcement, at approximately 8:07am, responded to a missing person report, regarding R1. It was reported that R1 was last seen in his/her room at 8:30pm the previous night. When checked approximately 30 minutes later, R1 was no longer there. On March 29, 2025, at approximately 7:30am, it reported that R1 was missing from his/her room. On April 1, 2025, at approximately 4:32pm, local law enforcement was informed R1 was found at Stevens Creek Blvd and Cypress Ave. The Department reviewed R1’s physician’s report dated September 8, 2023, which states R1 is not able to leave the facility unassisted. Based on a Google Maps Review, the location R1 was found was 2.9 miles from the facility, without staff supervision. As a result, an immediate civil penalty of $500.00 is being assessed Section 87468.2(a)(4) Additional Personal Rights of Residents in Privately Operated Facilities, against the facility today for violation for absence of supervision, which resulted in R1 eloping from the facility. The deficiency and civil penalty are assessed on a case management visit on 12/26/2025. See LIC809 for 12/26/2025. Licensee stated he would not sign the report because it was related to the elopement and civil penalty assessed. Licensee stated he was refusing to sign the report unless LPAs removed the civil penalty. LPA Tarin stated to Licensee the civil penalty would not be removed. Deficiencies are being cited during today's visit per California Code of Regulations Title 22. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee Biao Zhang and a signed copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 9, 2025
Apr 8, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marcella Tarin conducted a Case Management-Incident visit and met with Administrator (ADM) Biao Zhang. LPA stated the purpose of the visit. LPA observed 5 clients with 1 staff and the ADM. On 4/1/2025 the Department received an Incident Report for Resident R1 who eloped from the facility on 3/29/2025 at approximately 7:21AM on 3/29/2025. The facility informed local law enforcement and R1's responsible party. Local law enforcement located R1 on 4/1/2025. LPA toured the facility with ADM, and interviewed 2 staff and 3 residents. LPA requested documentation to include resident's admission agreement, emergency contact information, and video footage from 3/29/2025. LPA determined that this incident requires further investigation.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 8, 2025
20242 state visits · 2 documents
Nov 8, 2024Facility evaluation reportPOCReport on file
Type of visit: POC
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marcella Tarin arrived unannounced to conducted a case management to follow up on deficiencies that were cited on 10/30/2024. LPA met with Administrator (ADM) Biao Zhang. During the annual inspection on 10/30/2024, LPA Tarin observed medication and sharps in two separate unlocked drawers in the kitchen. During tour of resident rooms, LPA Tarin observed in R3's bedroom (resident room #3), medication in an unlocked dresser drawer. R3 has neurocognitive disorder and shares a bedroom with R2. R3 did not have an updated physician's report during visit. Deficiencies were issued for unlocked sharp and medication, and for R3 not having an updated physician's report (R3 has neurocognitive disorder). During today's visit, LPA Tarin toured the kitchen. LPA Tarin observed all kitchen drawers free of sharps and medication. LPA Tarin observed medication and sharps in a locked kitchen cabinet (above countertop, near kitchen sink). LPA toured R3's bedroom and observed no medication in unlocked dresser drawer. ADM stated medication has been moved to a locked cabinet in the kitchen. LPA Tarin observed medication in a locked kitchen cabinet, inaccessible to residents. LPA Tarin toured 4 additional resident room and checked dresser drawers and observed no medications in the dresser drawers. ADM provided LPA Tarin with documentation for R3's updated physician's report. ADM states R3 had an assessment with his/her physician on 11/7/2024, and is awaiting the updated physician report. ADM states the facility will submit a copy of the physician's report to LPA Tarin once it is received. See LIC 809C LPA Tarin cleared the deficiencies cited on 10/30/2024 during today's visit. A Letter of Deficiency Citations Cleared was printed and provided to ADM during today's visit. No deficiency was cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. This report was reviewed with Administrator, Biao Zhang and a copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 8, 2024
Oct 30, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marcella Tarin conducted an unannounced annual inspection visit at 9:25AM and met with Licensee Biao Zhang. LPA toured the facility inside and out with the Licensee to include the resident dining room, kitchen, resident bedrooms, bathrooms, and exterior. Facility temperature maintained at 71 degrees. Facility staff are fingerprint cleared and associated to facility. All emergency exits were observed to be clear of obstruction. LPA toured the kitchen area and observed a perishable food supply of at least two days and a non-perishable food supply of at least seven days. Refrigerator temperature maintained at 41 degrees F and freezer maintained at -5 degrees F. LPA measured hot water temperature at 106.3 for kitchen and 2 resident bathrooms. LPA observed medications were in a locked top kitchen cabinet. LPA observed additional medication and sharps in two separate unlocked drawers in the kitchen. LPA advised Licensee that all medications and sharps are to be locked and inaccessible to residents in care. LPA Tarin toured resident bedrooms. 6 out of 6 resident bedrooms had functioning lights, storage space for personal belongings, clean bedding, a chair, lamp and dresser/table. In R3's bedroom (resident room 3), LPA observed medication in an unlocked dresser drawer (picture taken). R3 bedroom is a shared bedroom with R2. The facility was equipped with smoke and carbon monoxide detectors and functioned properly when tested. Fire extinguishers were last serviced on 10/06/2023. LPA observed the facility first aid kit and it was observed to be complete. The facility fire/earthquake drill log was reviewed and drills are being conducted quarterly. The last fire drill was conducted on 08/23/2024. Facility has emergency disaster plan. See LIC809C LPA reviewed 6 residents Centrally Stored Medication and Destruction Records (CSMDR). LPA observed 6 out of 6 CSMDRs are complete with all medications accounted and documented. LPA observed the medication storage area was locked and inaccessible to residents in care. LPA reviewed 6 resident records. LPA observed 5 out of 6 resident records as complete to include a physician's report, TB result, updated appraisal/needs and services plan, identification and emergency contact information, personal rights, and consent forms. Resident (R3) record did not contain an updated physician's report. Resident R3 physician's report was not updated within the year. R3 has neurocognitive disorder. LPA advised Licensee to obtain updated physician's reports for Resident R3. LPA reviewed 3 staff records. LPA observed 2 out of 3 records to include fingerprint clearance, health screening, TB result, and personnel record. Staff 2's file was not available for review. Licensee states he does not have the documents for S2's file. LPA advised licensee that personnel records shall be available for review by the licensing agency. Deficiencies were cited today per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. A Technical Violation was also issued. See LIC809-D. Exit interview was conducted with Licensee Biao Zhang. A copy of this report was provided to Licensee and Appeal Rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 30, 2024
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 5 documents
20231 state visit · 1 document
Mar 20, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Lack of staff supervision resulted in resident elopement from the facility.
Licesning Program Analyst Ryker Heberle (LPA) conducted an unannoucned complaint inspection to deliver the findings regarding the above allegation. LPA met with facility administrator Biao Zhang (Admin). During complaint investigation on 12/18/2020, Admin confirmed that a resident (R1) had eloped from the facility on 11/25/2020 at 04:27am. Review of photographic evidence from facility exterior security cameras confirm time of resident elopement. Admin stated that he was unaware of live in staff member's activity during time of elopement. According to Admin, Staff discovered R1 had eloped at approximately 07:00am. Review of facility LIC 500 indicated that the facility had 1 staff member on shift during the time of the elopement. Continued on 9099-C. Substantiated During interview, Admin stated that the facility did not have any residents that were unable to leave the facility unassisted, however, during review of R1's physician's report, it was indicated that R1 was not permitted to leave the facility unassisted. Admin provided written correspondence with R1's family regarding R1's care at the facility. Text messages indicate that from dates ranging between September 2020 and December 2020, Admin had maintained consistent correspondence with R1's family, and had stated that R1's care needs, particularly as it pertained to wandering, have elevated beyond what the facility can provide, and indicated that both parties had been searching for alternative placement for that entire period, both parties had difficulty finding placement for the resident due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Since the elopement, staff has installed a wireless door alarm to alert staff of potential resident elopements. LPA observed the wireless door alarm to be operation during this visit. In review of photographic evidence submitted by a witness and facility incident report written regarding the elopement, it is confirmed that R1 sustained a bump on their head as well as bruising around the eye during the period in which R1 was not on the premises. The Department has conducted an investigation of the above allegation. Based on records reviewed and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Therefore, the Department found the above allegation to be SUBSTANTIATED. Deficiency is being cited and civil penalty is being assessed. See LIC 9099-D and LIC421. This report was reviewed with Administrator Biao Zhang and a copy of the signed report was provided via email due to printer error.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 20, 2023 · control 26-AS-20201209171404
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87464(f)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 21, 2023
87464 Basic Services (f) Basic services shall... include: (1) Care and supervision as defined in Section 87101(c)(3) and Health and Safety Code section 1569.2(c). This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and records review, Staff (S1) did not ensure resident (R1) who can’t leave facility unassisted was supervised while leaving the facility. This posed an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 20, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee increased night shift monitoring of residents. Door alarms were implemented. LPA observed documentation of daily resident checks and alarm door checks. POC observed to be completed on site.
20221 state visit · 1 document
Oct 13, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitDeficiency page: Type B
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst Ryker Heberle (LPA) conducted an unannounced annual inspection on 10/13/2022 at 10:03am. LPA met with facility Administrator Biao Zhang. LPA toured the facility, including living room, kitchen, family room, garage, office, 4 bedrooms, 2 bathrooms, back patio, backyard, and storage sheds. All staff members observed to be wearing masks. Admin confirmed that all staff and residents have been vaccinated. All emergency exits noted to be clear of obstruction. Bathrooms observed to have paper towels, and liquid soap, but no hand washing signs. Fire extinguisher observed to be inspected on December 2021. Smoke/carbon monoxide detectors tested and observed to be operational. Facility observed to have designated entry point. Staff took LPA's temperature, but did not screen for symptoms. Facility sign in sheet noted to not have tracking log for symptom screening. Facility does not have 30-days supply of N95s and gowns. Water temperature observed to be 105.0 *F. Facility temperature observed to be 71*F. During inspection of facility bathroom, LPA observed Lysol on bathroom counter top. Admin placed Lysol bottle under the bathroom sink, where other cleaning supplies were observed. Bathroom is accessible and utilized by residents with dementia at the facility. Admin stated that the cleaning supplies belonged to an independent resident that liked to keep his bathroom clean. LPA further observed detergent and laundry pods accessible to residents in the facility garage which is unlocked. Admin placed laundry supplies in a locked cabinet with other laundry supplies. Deficiency cited, advisory notes issued. This report was reviewed with Administrator Biao Zhang and a copy of the signed report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 13, 2022
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Plan of correction due date: Oct 20, 2022
87705 - Care for Persons with Dementia - (f) The following shall be stored inaccessible to residents with dementia: (2)...cleaning supplies and disinfectants. This requirement was not met as evidences by: Based on LPA observation, cleaning supplies were accessible to residents with dementia in facility bathroom and in unlocked facility garage. This posed a potential risk to the health and safety of residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 13, 2022
Plan of correction: Licensee to provide proof of correction by POC due date.
The state marks this report as 6 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
20212 state visits · 3 documents
Nov 4, 2021Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility staff left resident in soiled clothing for extended periods of time Lack of supervision resulting in resident sustaining multiple falls Facility is not communicating with resident's hospice Facility is not dispensing resident's medication as prescribed
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Marybeth Donovan and Christine Dolores arrived unannounced to deliver the complaint investiation findings. Allegation: Facility staff left resident in soiled clothing for extended period of time Between 06/25/2020-07/13/2020 a total of two staff members were interviewed. 2 out of 2 staff stated they were not aware of a time a resident was left in soiled clothing for an extended period of time. Staff stated residents are checked frequently to ensure they are not left in soiled clothing. Between 06/25/2020-08/05/2020 a total of six residents were interviewed. 6 out of 6 residents stated that residents were not left in soiled clothing for an extended period of time. Residents stated staff check on the residents to ensure they are dry. Page 1 of 3 Unsubstantiated On 06/25/2020 LPA Jackie Jin toured the facility via FaceTime. Residents were observed clean and engaged in activities of their choice. Allegation: Lack of supervision resulting in resident sustaining multiple falls Between 06/25/2020-07/13/2020 a total of two staff members were interviewed. 2 out of 2 staff stated R1 falls at night between 3am-5am. R1 was using the bathroom and does not want staff to be in the bathroom with R1. Staff get up during the night to check on the residents. All staff stated the residents do not need constant supervision. S1 stated that to prevent residents from falling, the bathroom has grab bars and nonskid mats, and the residents has half bed rails and the beds are lowered. Between 06/25/2020-08/05/2020 a total of six residents were interviewed. 5 out of 6 residents stated when a resident has fallen, staff will assist the resident back up and check for injuries. One resident does not recall falling at the facility. Incident report reviewed and noted R1 had two falls, one fall on 06/09/2020 at 3:15am and another fall on 06/13/2020 at 1:05am while going to the bathroom. The facility administrator and staff observed the incident. R1 was accessed for injuries and no injuries were noted. R1’s hospice agency was notified. After this incident, the facility plan was to have more supervision for R1 during the day and requested a different walking aid. Hospice plan of care indicated R1 is a high risk for falls. The facility staff will assist R1 to the bathroom during awake hours and bedtime. The facility will keep the path clear, label the bathroom, and leave the door open. Allegation: Facility is not communicating with resident hospice Hospice notes indicated that on 06/05/2020 and 06/11/2020 the hospice nurse and social worker attempted to contact the facility owner and it went straight to voicemail. Several call attempts were made, and the facility owner did not return call. Hospice notes also indicated that on 06/11/2020 the social worker called the facility owner through an unblocked number, and the social worker was able to speak to the facility owner. On 06/25/2020 S1 was interviewed and stated the facility landline goes directly to S1’s cellphone when someone calls. S1’s cellphone is available 24/7 and S1 can be reached after 7pm. S1’s cellphone initially was set up to Block an unknown a caller ID. S1 stated to prevent communication issues S1 changed the cellphone set up to receive calls from the hospice agency. Page 2 of 3 Between 07/13/2020-08/06/2020 LPA contacted facility administrator at 10:51am, 10:56am, and 7:04pm. Facility administrator responded to LPA’s calls and returned call when a voicemail was left. Allegation: Facility is not dispensing the resident’s medication as prescribed On 06/25/2020 S1 was interviewed and stated on 06/11/2020 there was a doctor’s order to increase prescription medication to 100mg, however, the doctor’s order was not sent to the doctor or to the pharmacy by the hospice nurse. S1 followed up with the hospice nurse on 06/16/2020, and new order for prescription medication was sent to the pharmacy. The facility received R1’s medication on the same day and started the medication. 3 out of 6 residents stated staff monitors their medications. Three residents stated they did not take medications at the facility. On 08/28/2020 LPA Jackie Jin conducted a medication audit via FaceTime with Administrator. Based on observation of medication audit, LPA is not able to determine if facility followed doctor's order when giving medication. Administrator did not indicate or recall start dates of medications. LPA is unable to determine how many pills were left in for each medication based on the quantity of medication prescribed and how long the residents were taking their medications. Doctor’s order for prescription medication was reviewed and it indicated that on 06/11/2020 prescription medication 100mg was ordered. Per Administrator, there was mis-communication between the hospice agency and the doctor’s order for prescription medication 100mg and a new doctor’s order was completed on 06/16/2020. Medication packing slip shows prescription medication 100mg was dispensed on 06/16/2020. Medication Administration Records (MAR) indicated that R1 began to take prescription medication 100mg on 06/16/2020 and was given daily at bedtime. MAR did not indicate any refusal of this medication. This Department has investigated the above allegations, and based on interviews, records review, and observations the Department has determined that the allegations were Unsubstantiated, meaning that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. This report was reviewed with Biao Zhang a copy of this report provided. Page 3 of 3the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 4, 2021 · control 26-AS-20200617154124
Nov 4, 2021Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Marybeth Donovan and Christine Delores conducted an unannounced case management visit to discuss record keeping of centrally stored medications. LPA met with Biao Zhang Administrator. During a medication audit on 08/28/2020 for an investigation and based on interview with Administrator that the centrally stored medication record start dates were not accurate. The start dates did not reflect the actual start date for medications with multiple refill bottles. When the resident is done with one bottle, the Administrator will start a new bottle. Also, the Administrator would mix medications from the existing bottle with the new prescription bottle. The actual start date was not recorded. LPAs reviewed medication procedures and record keeping of centrally stored medications with Administrator. The Administrator stated that prescription medications bottles are not mixed and accurate medication start dates are reflected on the Centrally Stored Medication Record and each prescription bottle. The following Advisory Note was issued see attached LIC9102 per the California Code of Regulations, Title 22. This report was reviewed with Biao Zhang Administrator and a copy provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 4, 2021
Oct 6, 2021Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst Ryker Heberle (LPA) conducted an unannounced annual inspection on 10/06/2021 at 04:03pm. LPA met with facility Administrator Biao Zhang. LPA toured the facility, including living room, kitchen, family room, garage, office, 4 bedrooms, 2 bathrooms, back patio, backyard, and storage sheds. All staff members observed to be wearing masks. Admin confirmed that all staff and residents have been vaccinated. All emergency exits noted to be clear of obstruction. Bathrooms observed to have paper towels, but no liquid soap or handwashing signs. Fire extinguisher observed to be inspected on December 2019. Smoke/carbon monoxide detectors tested and observed to be operational. Facility observed to have designated entry point. Front door not observed to have visitor policy or COVID prevention signs. Staff took LPA's temperature, but did not screen for symptoms. Facility sign in sheet noted to not have tracking log for temperature and symptom screening. Facility does not have 30-days supply of N95s and gowns. Water temperature observed to be 105.1 *F. Facility temperature observed to be 71*F. Social distancing signs not observed to be posted in all public areas of the facility. LPA observed odor of urine in resident room. Admin stated that staff was in the process of cleaning the room, after the resident had left for a doctor's appointment that morning. Resident sheets were observed to be clean and washed. LPA found resident medication on the shelves of 2 resident rooms. Review of resident files indicate that residents are capable of administering and storing their own medication. Admin stored resident medication out of sight during inspection. No deficiencies cited, advisory notes issued. This report was reviewed with Administrator Biao Zhang and a copy of the signed report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 6, 2021
6 of 6 beds were occupied at the March 20, 2023 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Zhang, Biao, licensed since 2016.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2016, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 10
- Total complaints
- 1
- Substantiated allegations
- 1
- Type A citations
- 1
- Type B citations
- 0
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2016, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 1 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 0 | 0 |
| Substantiated allegations | 1 | 0 |
| Total complaints | 1 | 0 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about West Valley Care Home
Is West Valley Care Home licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is West Valley Care Home licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has West Valley Care Home been cited?
1 Type A and 0 Type B citation since 2016, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 10 state visits over the same years.
Is West Valley Care Home still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.
What does West Valley Care Home cost?
$3,000 a month to start — listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026.
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.
Among 7 other homes of a similar licensed size in Campbell that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,975 to $5,925 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 7 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does West Valley Care Home take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Zhang, Biao, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
El Camino Health Los Gatos is 1.7 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can West Valley Care Home keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 1 resident, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
West Valley Care Home license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “WEST VALLEY CARE HOME”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #435202536. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to Zhang, Biao, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2016, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 10 state inspection visits since 2016, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 1 Type A and 0 Type B citation on file since 2016, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 10 state visits in that period.
- 1 complaint and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 2016, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is January 28, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in Santa Clara County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Starting rate
$4,900 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$4,200 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,400 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,600–$5,450On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,450 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,650–$5,500On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,800 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,600–$7,650On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,650 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,800–$5,750On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore Santa Clara County