Small home · Licensed for 6 · Santa Maria
Lorie's RCFE LLC #3
1017 Sugar Bush Dr, Santa Maria, CA 93454Licensed since 2019
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 6 residents
- Hospiceup to 2 residents
- Bedriddenup to 2 residents
Not on file: dementia approval.
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 2 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 2 RESIDENTS.
935 - ELDERLY
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 2 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Lorie's RCFE LLC #3: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight, help with medicines and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
Covelight estimate
$5,000a month to start
Likely $4,100–$6,200
From 8 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$5,000likely a month
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$5,000likely $4,100–$6,200
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes and similar homes within 25 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $4,100–$6,350
- $5,000
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,800–$9,550
- $7,500
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes8 nearby homes publish starting rates of $4,300 to $7,750
8 homes like this within 25 miles publish starting rates mostly between $4,400–$7,500.
- Yokam's RCFE # 1NNipomo · 6.2 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Villa Mariposa Senior CareNipomo · 6.5 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Casa Rosa Elder CareArroyo Grande · 11 mi · Mid-size home$7,750Listed on Seniorly · assisted living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Cypress Garden Home CareArroyo Grande · 12 mi · Small home$7,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Alder HouseArroyo Grande · 14 mi · Mid-size home$4,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Heritage ResidenceGrover Beach · 15 mi · Small home$4,300Listed on Seniorly · assisted living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Edna Rose ResidenceSan Luis Obispo · 20 mi · Small home$7,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Chateau RoseSan Luis Obispo · 25 mi · Small home$7,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes and similar homes within 25 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.
The best way to see it is a visit.
Request a tourWhere it is
1017 Sugar Bush Dr, Santa Maria, CA 93454Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- Marian Regional Medical CenterHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list0.8 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #425850021 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 5 of 9 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 1 “Substantiated”.
20261 state visit · 1 document
Aug 21, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rankin arrived at 8:40 am and made an unannounced 1-year required annual visit to the facility above. LPA met with Claire Aviado, administrator designee and Freda Robles the Administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. A tour of the inside and outside of the facility was conducted. The following was inspected and noted during the annual visit: Physical Plant & Environment Safety: The facility has 5 resident bedrooms, 1 staff bedroom, and 3 bathrooms currently occupying 5 residents. The facility has smoke and carbon monoxide detectors that were tested and working at the time of visit. The lighting is sufficient for the use of the facility and resident comfort. The toilet, hand washing and bathing facilities are operational and secure grab bars are present. The showers have non-skid mats/flooring. The pathways are clear of any obstructions. Disinfectant and cleaning solutions are inaccessible to residents in care. The facility has sufficient space inside and outside for activities and visiting. The facility has a fenced backyard for client use with plenty of shade. Operational Requirements: The facility has current liability insurance that expires on 9/11/26. The facility is operating in compliance with the granted fire clearance. The facility is approved for a capacity of 6. The fire clearance is granted for 2 bedridden residents. A hospice waiver is approved for 2 residents. Continued 809-C Personnel Records & Training: The facility employs 10 caregivers who work full-time and/or as relief as needed, and 3 administrators. Five files were reviewed for, but not limited to current 1st Aid/CPR, Health screening with TB results, Criminal Record statements, files were complete. The Administrator Certificate expires 3/9/2027. Staff have annual training completed for various required subjects/topics and hours for 2026. Resident Records & Incident Reports: The facility keeps resident records confidential. Facility does submit incident reports to the department when required. LPA reviewed 5 resident files for, but not limited do, current Physician Records and Appraisals Needs and Services Plan, Emergency and ID forms, all forms were legible, and records are kept complete. Food Service: The kitchen and storage areas were clean and maintained. The facility has 2-day perishables and 7 day non-perishables to meet the food service requirement. All food is covered, stored, and marked appropriately. Incidental Medical Services: Facility provides or assists in providing transportation to medical and dental appointments when needed. The facility uses the Medication Administration Record (MAR) along with the Centrally Stored Medication and Destruct Records (CSMDR). LPA reviewed a sampling of residents’ medications, no labels were altered, no medications were expired, and all medications were kept in their original containers. Disaster Preparedness: The current emergency disaster forms were posted. The facility conducts quarterly drills, the last disaster drill was conducted on 6/9/2026. Emergency exits and telephone numbers were posted. A set of keys is available for staff on all shifts to access full facility in an emergency. The fire extinguishers were last charged and inspected on 4/20/26. The facility has a sprinkler system throughout. Residents with Special Health Needs: The facility does accept dementia residents in care. The facility does not have delayed egress, locked doors or gates. Exit gate alarms are working. Exit door alarm to room next to the front door will be replaced as it leads directly to the outside and the alarm was faint. Exit interview conducted and copy of report printed for Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 21, 2026
The state marks this report as 6 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 3. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
20252 state visits · 3 documents
Oct 2, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility mishandling client's medication Facility failed to notify Licensing agency of eviction.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rankin conducted a subsequent complaint visit to issue final findings on this investigation. LPA met with Back-up Administrator Claire Aviado and explained the purpose of the visit. During the investigation, LPA conducted an initial visit on 6/6/2025, where LPA conducted an interview with the administrator, licensee, and back-up administrator and obtained relevant documents. Additional interviews were conducted with relevant parties on 6/4/25, 6/5/25, 6/6/25, 9/23/25, and 10/1/25. Additional documents were collected during collateral visit on 8/19/25. On the allegation: Facility mishandling client's medication It was alleged that the facility did not properly supervise, record, distribute, and manage medication for R1. Continued on 9099-C Substantiated RP states that carbidopa levodopa was often not on time as directed by doctor. Interviews with two witnesses state R1 had expressed concern that the Parkinson’s medication carbidopa levodopa was not given as ordered. Interview with witnesses, F1, and administrators all state medication orders for Parkinson’s would change “all the time.” LPA reviewed Centrally Stored Medication and Destruction Record (CSMDR) and Medication Administration Records (MAR), these records along with Physician Visits notes showed orders for Carbidopa changed at least 4 times since November of 2024. A CSMDR medication note is written in that an order for 2 tabs by mouth 6 times a day started on 10/21/24 by Physician #1. 11/2/24 2 tablets 3 times a day by Physician #1. 12/3/24 2 tabs by mouth 6 times a day by Physician #1. Physician Visit notes by Physician #2 on 3/21/25 stated to “remove the extra 2 carbidopa…” then lists 5 different times to distribute. Then another change by Physician #2 of this medication on 4/21/25 back to 6 times a day. LPA reviewed the CSMDR and found that the 2 orders noted on the Physician Visit notes were not updated on the CSMDR records and the MAR due to Physician #2 is not the prescribing physician and the prescribing physician #1 would be upset with the attempt to override their orders. Additionally, the CSMDR has a record that a prescription from Physician #1 with the same prescription number as the October through March orders was started on 4/5/25 and is the only Carbidopa medication listed on the CSMDR which kept the order of 2 tabs by mouth 6 times a day. Physician Visit documented on 5/8/25, notes from Physician #3 state R1 was swollen and there was to be an increase in Furosemide. Physician visit note shows Physician #4 on 5/16/25 noted “lasix 40 mg daily”. Furosemide and Lasix are the same medication. The new medication was not filled until 5/16/25 and was not started per the CSMDR until 5/21/25. Per documentation, this is a delay in following doctor’s order for at minimum 12 days and 5 days following receipt of the medication. Continued on 9099C Discussion and review of Facilities Physician Visit notes show that Credible Witness 2 (W2) states on 3/18/25 that resident was observed breathing heavily during a visit. 12/17/24 notes from W2 state R1 was “concerned about medication management by staff. Reporting multiple people giving (R1) medications at inconsistent times.” Interview and record review from staff at facility where R1 transferred on 5/29/25, a copy of the medication release form was provided to LPA. This form lists all medication that came from Lorie’s RCFE and signed off by the responsible party. The form has written quantities appearing to be from Lorie’s staff with 8 of the 18 medications listed having adjusted quantities written in with a plus sign and an added number. Staff at the new facility stated that the medication was counted upon intake and an adjustment to one of the medication counts was noted on their copy of the form. There were four medications noted by Lorie’s RCFE to have a quantity ranging from 165 to 772 pills being sent to the new facility. Administrators claim that family would request leftover medication to be kept due to co-payment needed for each change. LPA review of CSMDR shows the facility would start medications out of date fill order, one instance a medication started in 4/20/25 was filled in 8/7/24, another instance started 4/6/25, was originally filled 10/11/24. It is also noted that RX numbers were opened out of order, even when no change in doctor order is noted. Of the 7 medications reviewed, there are 12 instances where the medication is not listed on the CSMDR record for multiple months, but the MAR provided record that the medication was given during these months. Based on interviews and record reviews, the allegation is Substantiated. The facility failed to maintain accurate and consistent medication records,and based on records delayed implementation of physician orders. Continue 9099-C On the allegation: Facility failed to notify Licensing agency of eviction. LPA discussed with Licensee regarding the requirement to provide Licensing with a copy of eviction notices. Licensee stated they were unaware and would provide a copy of the notice. Notice was emailed to Licensing on 6/6/25. Notice given to R1 was dated 5/1/25 and had an eviction date of 5/30/25. Resident moved out on 5/29/25. Based on the interview and record review, the allegation is deemed Substantiated at this time. Pursuant to Title 22 Division 6 Chapter 8 of the CA Code of Regulations, the following deficiency was cited (refer to LIC 9099-D): Exit interview conducted. Copy of report and Appeal Rights issued at the time of the visit. On the allegation: Staff failed to meet resident's medical needs It was alleged the facility failed to meet R1’s medical needs, including concerns related to wound care, incontinence care, use of an inhaler, response to call bells, and feeding assistance. LPA reviewed the facility’s Home Health Documentation Log and interviewed a Home Health agent (W1). Records show that a Registered Nurse (RN) and Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) provided wound care and medical oversight on 4/25/25, 4/28/25, 5/1/25, 5/5/25, 5/9/25, 5/12/25, 5/16/25, 5/19/25, 5/21/25, 5/26/25, and 5/29/25. W1 confirmed that nurses’ notes documented wound care, fall prevention education, and management of bilateral edema. W1 stated that no concerns were noted regarding facility staff or care, and staff were described as attentive and caring. Interviews with home health staff confirmed instructions provided to staff were followed regarding wound care. Records reviewed also showed that Speech, and Physical Therapy had visited the resident eight times from 4/25/25 to 5/29/25. Interviews with staff and administrators from both this facility and a subsequent facility where R1 resided confirmed that R1 was able to advocate for their needs. Staff reported that R1 did not always inform them when their brief was wet. One incident was noted where R1 was observed with wet pants, and staff stated R1 had been changed earlier but had not communicated the need for another change. Interview with F1 stated Administrator Claire instructed staff to increase the frequency of checks for R1’s incontinence needs. It was alleged that staff initially used medical tape to treat a skin tear from a fall. F1 stated that Administrator Claire later re-dressed the wound using steri-strips and believed the initial use of medical tape was inappropriate. However, there was no documentation from Home Health or other medical professionals indicating that the use of medical tape caused harm or was improper. It was alleged that R1 was being fed too quickly. F1 stated that Administrator Freda reportedly instructed staff to slow down during feeding. An Occupational Therapist (OT) was brought in to support R1’s independence with feeding. OT notes reviewed with W1 indicated that both staff and R1 demonstrated understanding of feeding instructions. Follow-up visits on 5/13/25 recommended adaptive utensils and plates, with improvement noted. The final OT note on 5/27/25 stated that the goal of independent feeding was “not attained” and that R1 would continue to require assistance. It was alleged staff did not respond to R1’s call bell for their inhaler. Interview with F1 stated while on the phone with R1, R1 needed their inhaler and was told to ring their bell. R1 stated no one responded, so F1 text an administrator to get the inhaler. Per F1, staff were “annoyed” and said R1 would ask F1 for care that was needed, including the inhaler, but did not ask staff for it. Text messages showed multiple occasions where R1 communicated needs to F1, but not to facility staff. Interview with witnesses stated that R1 was hallucinating at night, having night terrors, and increased anxiety. R1 claimed the anxiety was due to no one responding to their calls at night. It was noted on a physician visit on 3/18/25 that R1 was “concerned about breathing – heaviness at night mostly. [R1] is also having increased anxiety due to staff not responding to [R1] call/bell ringing at night.” Per W2 notes, R1 still reported night terrors on 4/8/25. An incident report states on 2/15/25, R1 made a call to 911 claiming another resident was having a heart attack. Emergency personnel showed up and checked on the other resident, and found other resident was asleep and not experiencing any issues. Another incident report on 3/13/25 noted that at 11:10pm during rounds, staff noticed resident was awake, hallucinating, had made a mess of R1’s room and also admitted to calling the facility house phone. The administrator and F1 were notified of this behavior. On this same report, facility states that family instructed staff to take R1’s cell phone at night, and it was stated by family and administrator that R1 was aware and ok with this. Interviews with staff stated they always respond to bells during the day and night, have awake staff at night. LPA verified the bells used was at one time a hand bell and at one time a push button remote bell, both were audible throughout the house. LPA unable to conduct interview with current residents in care due to cognitive concerns. A physician’s report dated 5/15/25 stated that R1 required a higher level of care, specifically Skilled Nursing. The facility issued an eviction notice based on this assessment. Administrators and documentation confirmed that R1 was declining, had increased fall risk, and was resistant to staff education and redirection. A Home Health RN note described R1 as “resistant to education.” The investigation showed the facility attempted to meet R1’s medical care needs, and no concerns were noted in documentation or interviews from medical professionals who treated R1 at the facility. Although the allegation may have occurred or is valid, there is insufficient evidence to prove the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit report provided to administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 2, 2025 · control 29-AS-20250604185454
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87224(f) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 15, 2025
87224(f) Eviction Procedures A written report of any eviction shall be sent to the licensing agency within five (5) days. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited when an eviction notice was not sent to licensing, which posed a potential personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 2, 2025
Plan of correction: Licensee agree to review reporting requirements for RCFE's in various sections of Title 22 and provide a statement acknowledging review of and training to administrators of these requirements 87224 - Eviction Procedures, 87705, 87211 - Reporting Requirements.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87465(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 15, 2025
87465(a)(4) Incidental Medical and Dental Care (4) The licensee shall assist residents with self-administered medications as needed. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as 6 of 7 resident medications reviewed contained inconsistencies with their medication quantity and amounts documented as administered on the MAR which poses an immediate health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 2, 2025
Plan of correction: Administrator agreed to do a complete medication audit for the facility and training for all medication staff and submit documentation to CCL by POC due date 10/15/25.
Oct 2, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency page: Type B
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melisa Rankin conducted an unannounced Case Management - Deficiencies inspection due to deficiencies observed during the investigation for Complaint control # 29-AS-20250604185454. LPA met with Back-up Administrator Claire Aviado and explained the reason for the visit. During the complaint investigation LPA did a review of medication records for residents currently residing at the facility, the following deficiency was observed: An audit of the Centrally Stored Medication and Destruction Records (CSMDR) and Medication Administration Records (MAR) LPA noted 11 medications refills were not logged as required. It was observed that there was three months’ extra supply of medications on hand that had not been recorded. Additionally, an audit of the medications showed missing CSMDR logs for January medications. Further review showed that the medication refills were not used in order of the supply on hand, the records stated that refills used in August were July refill and September was August refill, but LPA found that the July and August refills were still pending use and the records were inaccurately recorded. In one case the prescription stated one tablet by mouth twice a day, but facility had reduced the medication to one time a day due to the medication side effect on the resident but had not obtained a discontinue or updated doctor’s order to support the change. Continued on 809-C Based on record review for resident 1 (R1) and additional review of records for resident 2 (R2) the facility is being cited for inaccurate record keeping and failure to note all medications on the CSMDR. Facility was reminded Physician orders should be followed and updated if changes are required, facility was reminded that medication should be used in the order it is received, unless a order has changed, that all medications, once received at the facility should be recorded on the CSMDR, that the information on the CSMDR needs to be accurate and match the medication packages, and that the administrator should do training any time an error occurs, as well as the required annual 16 hour training and that medication audits should be done regularly to ensure staff are following all requirements for the safety of residents in care. Pursuant to Title 22, California Code of Regulations, the following deficiencies are cited (refer to LIC9099-D). Exit interview conducted, appeal rights discussed, and a copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 2, 2025
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87465(h)(6) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 15, 2025
(h) The following requirements shall apply to medications which are centrally stored: (6) The licensee shall be responsible for assuring that a record of centrally stored prescription medications...is maintained... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as 11 refill medications were not logged, medications logged was logged in with incorrect refill dates and discontinued orders were not on hand for medication that was reduced which poses a potential health and safety risk to clients in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 2, 2025
Plan of correction: Administrator agreed to complete a medication audit and to log all medications properly on their respective CSMDR. Administrator will submit proof to CCLD no later than POC due date.
Aug 8, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rankin arrived at 10:45 am and made an unannounced 1-year required annual visit to the facility above. LPA met with Claire Aviado, administrator designee and Freda Robles Administrator explained the purpose of the visit. A tour of the inside and outside of the facility was conducted. The following was inspected and noted during the annual visit: Physical Plant & Environment Safety: The facility has 5 bedrooms and 3 bathrooms currently occupying 4 residents. The facility has smoke and carbon monoxide detectors that were tested and working at the time of visit. The lighting is sufficient for the use of the facility and resident comfort. The toilet, hand washing and bathing facilities are operational and secure grab bars are present. The showers have non-skid mats/flooring. The pathways are clear of any obstructions. Disinfectant and cleaning solutions are inaccessible to residents in care. The facility has sufficient space inside and outside for activities and visiting. The facility has a fenced backyard for client use with plenty of shade. Operational Requirements: The facility has current liability insurance that expires on 9/11/25. The facility is operating in compliance with the granted fire clearance. The facility is approved for a capacity of 6. The fire clearance is granted for 2 bedridden residents. A hospice waiver is approved for 2 residents. Personnel Records & Training: The facility currently employs 5 full-time caregivers, and 3 administrators. Records are kept confidential. Files were reviewed for, but not limited to current 1st Aid/CPR, Health screening with TB results, Criminal Record statements, files were complete. Continued 809-C The administrator file was reviewed for Continuing Education requirements and Designee Administrator Certificate expires 9/2026. Staff have annual training completed for various required subjects/topics and hours for 2025. Resident Records & Incident Reports: The facility keeps resident records confidential. Facility does submit incident reports to the department when required. LPA reviewed 5 resident files for, but not limited do, current Physician Records and Appraisals Needs and Services Plan, Emergency and ID forms, all forms were legible, and records are kept complete. Food Service: The kitchen and storage areas were clean and maintained. The facility has 2-day perishables and 7 day non-perishables to meet the food service requirement. All food is covered, stored, and marked appropriately. Incidental Medical Services: Facility provides or assists in providing transportation to medical and dental appointments when needed. The facility uses the Medication Administration Record (MAR) along with the Centrally Stored Medication and Destruct Records (CSMDR). LPA reviewed a sampling of residents’ medications, no labels were altered, no medications were expired, and all medications were kept in their original containers. Additional medication processes are being implemented. Disaster Preparedness: The current emergency disaster forms were posted. The facility conducted a quarterly disaster drill 6/12/2025. Emergency exits and telephone numbers were posted. A set of keys is available for staff on all shifts to access full facility in an emergency. The fire extinguishers were last charged and inspected on 4/23/25. Residents with Special Health Needs: The facility does accept dementia residents in care. The facility does not have delayed egress, locked doors or gates. Exit gate alarms are working. Exit interview conducted and copy of report printed for Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 8, 2025
The state marks this report as 6 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 3. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
20241 state visit · 1 document
Aug 14, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Miller arrived at 9:15 a.m and made an unannounced 1-year required annual visit to the facility above. LPA met with Claire Aviado, administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. A tour of the inside and outside of the facility was conducted. The following was inspected and noted during the annual visit: Infection Control: The facility has a current Infection Control Plan. The facility has a sign in and out binder for visitors with hand sanitizer. The bathrooms have toilet paper, paper towels, hand soap. The facility has at least a 30-day supply of PPE. Quarantined or isolated individuals will have meals and medication delivered to rooms. Staff are trained on infection control and the use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). Physical Plant & Environment Safety: The fire extinguishers were last charged and inspected on 2/5/24. The facility has 5 resident bedrooms, 1 staff bedroom and 3 bathrooms currently occupying 4 residents. LPA was authorized to enter and inspect facility. The facility has smoke and carbon monoxide detectors that were tested. The lighting and lamps are sufficient for the use of the facility and for resident comfort. Toilet, hand washing and bathing facilities are operational and secured grab bars are present. The showers have non-skid mats. The pathways are clear of any obstructions. Facility is well lit inside and outside for safety. Disinfectant and cleaning solutions are inaccessible to residents in care and are locked in a shed in the backyard and in a cupboard in the garage. The facility has sufficient space inside and outside for activities and visiting. The facility has a fenced backyard for client use with plenty of shade. The facility has telephone and internet service for resident use. Continued 809-C Operational Requirements: The facility has a current plan of operation on file with the department. The facility has current liability insurance that expires on 9/11/24. The facility is operating in compliance with the granted fire clearance. The facility is approved for a capacity of 6. The fire clearance is granted for 4 non- ambulatory and 2 bedridden residents. A hospice waiver is approved for 2 residents. The facility currently has 4 non-Ambulatory, 2 of which are on hospice. Staffing: The facility currently employs 5 full time caregivers, and 3 administrators. Staff records are kept confidential. Files reviewed had current 1st Aid/CPR, Personnel Records/Application, Health screening with TB results, Criminal Record statements, and Fingerprint clearance/Associations/exemptions. Administrator file was reviewed for Continuing Education requirements and Administrator Certificate expires 8/14/25. Personnel Records & Training: The facility keeps confidential files for each staff member. Staff have annual training completed for various subjects/topics and hours for 2024. Resident Records & Incident Reports: The facility keeps separate files on each resident confidentially. Facility does submit incident reports to the department when required. LPA reviewed 4 resident files for signed Admission Agreements, Personal Rights, Safeguard for property and valuables, Physicians reports, Pre-appraisals, Appraisals Needs and Services Plan, Emergency and ID forms, all forms were legible, and records are kept confidential. Food Service: The facility handles and prepares food safely. The facility has 2-day perishables and 7 day non-perishables to meet the food service requirement. The freezer is kept at 0 degrees and the refrigeration is kept at 40 degrees or lower. All food is covered, stored, and marked appropriately. Cleaning solutions and equipment are stored separately from food supplies. Continued 809-C Incidental Medical Services: Facility provides transportation or assists in providing transportation to medical and dental appointments when needed. The facility uses the Medication Administration Record (MAR) along with the Centrally Stored Medication and Destruct Records (CSMDR). LPA reviewed residents’ medications, no labels were altered, no medications were expired, and all medications were kept in their original containers. Disaster Preparedness: The current emergency disaster forms were posted. The facility last conducted a quarterly disaster drill 7/4/2024. Emergency exits and telephone numbers were posted. A set of keys is available for staff on all shifts to access full facility in an emergency. Residents with Special Health Needs: The facility does accept dementia residents in care. The facility does not have delayed egress, locked doors or gates. Exit door alarms are working. Exit interview conducted and copy of report printed for Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 14, 2024
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 4 documents
20231 state visit · 1 document
Jul 27, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jenny Olson arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit at 1:15 p.m. When LPA arrived, there were two staff, administrator and six residents present. LPA was greeted by Administrator and informed them of the reason for the visit. LPA toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. KITCHEN: Knives are stored in a locked drawer in the kitchen. Kitchen appliances were in operable condition. The facility has a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food. Common areas: Living and dining room furniture were observed to be in good condition. There is a fireplace in the living room, which is screened and inaccessible. At 2:00 p.m., smoke detector(s) and carbon monoxide detector were tested and operational at the time of the visit. LPA observed required postings throughout the common space. The fire extinguisher was charged and serviced 2/28/2023. The backyard has a covered outdoor area equipped with furniture for client use. No bodies of water noted. The washer and dryer are in the garage. The garage is unlocked. Restrooms: The three resident restrooms were clean and sanitary and in operating condition with non-skid mats. The bathrooms were sufficiently stocked with soap and paper towels. Around 2:00 p.m., the hot water temperature measured in the bathroom at 119.9 degrees Fahrenheit. Bedrooms: There are five (5) resident rooms, which were furnished. A linen closet was located outside of the rooms, which stocked extra linens and towels. Records: LPA reviewed resident and staff records around 1:30 p.m. LPA reviewed five (5) resident files for, but not limited to, the following: signed admission agreements, current medical assessments with TB results, and current needs and services plan. Continued on 809-C LPA reviewed five (5) staff files for, but not limited to, the following: personnel records, health screening, criminal record statements, current first aid certification. All files were complete. MEDICATIONS: Medications review began at 2:45 p.m. The medications are centrally stored and locked in a cabinet in the dining room. Medications are labeled and checked for expiration dates. LPA advised the Administrator to ensure that correct information is properly documented on the CSMAR. INFECTION CONTROL: The facility has an adequate supply of Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) and the facility is able to obtain additional supplies as needed. The facility’s cleaning protocol is sufficient. If needed, the facility has the capacity to designate a single isolation room if the facility has a confirmed case of COVID-19. The facility’s policies and procedures as it pertains to infection control are adequate. At 3:40 p.m., LPA interviewed two (2) staff members and two (2) residents. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 27, 2023
The state marks this report as 10 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
20221 state visit · 1 document
Jul 26, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Olson conducted an on-site 1 year infection control annual visit to the facility above on 07/26/2022 at 12:55 PM. LPA met with Claire Aviado, Administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA took a physical plant tour of the inside and outside of the facility with Administrator. The facility has an entry point next to the front door where everyone entering completes sign-in, symptoms screening and temperature check for all staff and visitors wanting to come into the facility. All documentation is kept on file. The staff screen residents for symptoms and temperature once a day and documentation is kept on file. Increased monitoring is conducted if any change of condition are noted or any residents are showing any signs, symptoms or a temperature. Signs are posted on the front door and throughout the facility regarding Covid-19. Staff makes sure residents have a mask when leaving the facility on outings into the community. All staff wear face coverings in the facility and when on outings with residents. Facility has areas for visiting inside and outside. The facility also offers virtual and telephone communications to all residents in care. Staff, Residents and visitors are informed of the facilities infection control policies. New residents and staff will be tested and negative results received before working or residing in the facility. Residents rights are not being violated. Residents and Responsible Parties are notified by facility when required. Continued 809-C The facility has procedures and plans for screening, isolation, testing, when to call 911 and notifying all responsible parties and agencies when needed. Emergency Disaster plan is up to date and all agencies with telephone numbers are listed and posted. Administrator is in charge of infection control and provides training and education to staff, residents and visitors. If any suspected or confirmed cases of Covid-19 are found in the facility a staff will use PPE supplies that will be located right outside those rooms when required. Facility has a 30 day supply of PPE on hand. Facility has plans for delivering medications and meals to any quarantined or isolated resident room. The facility has proper cleaning and disinfectant policies. Facility Administrator has a plan in place for when and whom to notify in an outbreak or other emergencies. Administrator will keep a line list of all vaccinated and tested staff/residents in care with dates/results. Facility has conducted training on infection prevention, symptoms, transmission and PPE use. Facility has non-punitive sick leave polices for staff. Sick staff are requested to stay home and not report to work if ill. Activities have been modified to individuals or small groups with social distancing. Residents medication is delivered in 30 day supplies to the facility. The facility ensures proper cleaning is done on frequently touched surfaces and between any individuals sharing of space or items. Sinks were well stocked with soap, paper towels and hand washing signs. Staff and resident records are kept in locked cabinet. Facility does realize guidance changes and the most up to date guidance from CCL-PINS, CDC, CDPH, and local health departments should be followed to remain in compliance. The most stringent orders should be followed by any of these agencies. Administrator Certificates are valid. Fire extinguishers are charged and inspected annually. Smoke alarms and Carbon monoxide detectors are present. No deficiencies observed during the visit and all infection control protocols are implemented and are being followed. Exit interview completed and copy of report emailed to Administrator/Licensee.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 26, 2022
20212 state visits · 2 documents
Jul 29, 2021Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
At 2:35 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Toan Luong conducted an unannounced on-site one year infectious control annual visit to the facility after initiating facility risk assessment. LPA met with Administrator Claire Aviado and explained the purpose of the visit. Administrator Claire Aviado took LPA on a physical plant tour of the facility. The facility has submitted a mitigation plan to the department. The facility is a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly. During the facility tour, LPA advise Administrator to post latest CDSS PINs to be accessible to residents, staff, and visitors. LPA discussed benefits of fit-testing N95 masks for staff to avoid temporary staffing of nurses and other trained professionals. LPA explained steps facility may take to fit-test staff. LPA reviewed the Annual Mitigation Inspection Control Tool Module. Module was addressed with Administrator to satisfaction. Exit interview was conducted. No deficiencies were cited. Report was emailed to the Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 29, 2021
Apr 9, 2021Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure facility was free from insects
This is an amended report. Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chavez conducted a visit to the facility to deliver final findings of a complaint investigated by LPA Diaz. On the allegation: Staff did not ensure facility was free from insects. LPA Diaz reviewed facility documents and conducted interviews with staff, a credible witness and a family member. LPA interviewed staff on 6/3/21 at 2:38pm; on 6/4/21 at 3:56pm; on 6/7/21 at 10:25am, 2:45pm and at 4:00pm; on 6/8/21 at 11:55am; and on 6/9/21 at 2:45pm. LPA interviewed Resident 1’s (R1’s) family member on 6/8/21 at 4:15pm. LPA interviewed a credible witness on 4/7/21 at 9:53am. According to the Administrator, in the month of March 2021, a family member saw ants near R1’s bedroom door entrance. S1 inspected the backyard of the facility and saw 7 ants on R1’s outside door. The family member confirmed with the LPA that they saw ants on the floor near the entrance of R1’s bedroom door. On 3/23/21 the Administrator had maintenance spray the exterior of the facility, and pest control inspect the facility. The Pest Control Operator observed a singular trail of ants in a space of 15 feet outside. Pest Control applied Termendor, a non-repellent chemical in the ant nest outside the facility. Pest control also baited the interior of the facility and around the sinks for precaution. In addition, facility maintenance staff purchased insecticide on 4/1/21 and sprayed it to exterior according to the licensee. The licensee stated that the witness arrived at the facility on 3/31/21 and told Staff 2 (S2) that ants were at the foot of R1’s bed and on R1’s pillow. The witness confirmed on 3/31/21 they saw three ants on R1’s pillow, and near R1’s feet and saw over twenty ants moving on and underneath R1’s chuck pad. The credible witness notified S2, and S2 acknowledged there were ants in R1s bed. The credible witness stated they killed and swiped away many ants from the bed. According to an interview with S2, S2 entered R1’s room and saw 3 ants at the foot of the bed, and 1 ant on R1’s pillow. The credible witness asked S2 to change the bedsheets but S2 needed help from Staff 3 (S3). Interviews with S3 and S4 revealed S2 informed them about the ants in R1’s room. S2 told S3 and S4 that the credible witness saw lots of ants in R1s bed and S2 saw a total of 4 ants near the pillow and on at the foot of the bed. S2 also told S4 the credible witness tried to kill some of the ants that were on the bed. Based on the evidence gathered through interviews and records reviewed, the allegation is deemed substantiated at this time. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 9, 2021 · control 29-AS-20210401162329
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1 · Plan of correction due date: Apr 13, 2021
87468.1 Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities. Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: To be accorded safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations, furnishings and equipment. Based on interview, the facility did not provide R1 safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations, as ants were observed in R1’s bed, which poses a potential health, safety, and personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 9, 2021
Plan of correction: The Administrator agreed to hold a personal rights training with all staff, and will submit proof of training to CCL.
5 of 6 beds were occupied at the October 2, 2025 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Lorie's RCFE, LLC #3, licensed since 2019.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2019, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 8
- Total complaints
- 1
- Substantiated allegations
- 2
- Type A citations
- 0
- Type B citations
- 2
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2019, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 0 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 2 | 0 |
| Substantiated allegations | 2 | 0 |
| Total complaints | 1 | 0 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Lorie's RCFE LLC #3
Is Lorie's RCFE LLC #3 licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Lorie's RCFE LLC #3 licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Lorie's RCFE LLC #3 been cited?
0 Type A and 2 Type B citations since 2019, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 8 state visits over the same years.
Is Lorie's RCFE LLC #3 still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 12, 2026.
What does Lorie's RCFE LLC #3 cost?
$5,000 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,100–$6,200. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes and similar homes within 25 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 10 other homes of a similar licensed size across Santa Barbara County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,500 to $5,200 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 10 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Lorie's RCFE LLC #3 take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Lorie's RCFE, LLC #3, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Marian Regional Medical Center is 0.8 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Lorie's RCFE LLC #3 keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 2 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Lorie's RCFE LLC #3 license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “LORIE'S RCFE LLC #3”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #425850021. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to Lorie's RCFE, LLC #3, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2019, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 8 state inspection visits since 2019, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 2 Type B citations on file since 2019, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 8 state visits in that period.
- 1 complaint and 2 substantiated allegations on file since 2019, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is August 21, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in Santa Barbara County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,200 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,250–$6,400On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,000 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,100–$6,200On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,500 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,650–$5,550On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,850 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,000–$6,000On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,450 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,650–$5,450On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,150 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,200–$6,350On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore Santa Barbara County