Serra Highlands Senior Living is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Daly City, San Mateo County, California — state license #415601127, licensed for 120 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 28 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated May 20, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

40 homes in view

Serra Highlands Senior Living

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 120 residents · Daly City, CA · San Mateo County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceMemory care not on fileBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #415601127, held since 2023 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
501 King Drive · Daly City, San Mateo County
Phone
(650) 878-5111
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 120 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careVerified in record
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 120 NON-AMBULATORY RESIDENTS. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR SIX (6) RESIDENTS. NEW MGT CO, DALY CITY 2 MGR LLC, EFFECTIVE 2/3/25.State service designation985 - RCFE / HOSPICEthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 35 times and filed 28 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated May 20, 2026.

Most recent state visit
May 20, 2026
Occupancy at the March 13, 2026 visit
50 of 120 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 10 documents with transcribed findings, dated February 7, 2024 to March 13, 2026. 10 of the 10 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (6), “Unsubstantiated” (4). 10 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 10 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 24 of 28 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20267 state visits · 11 documents
May 20, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 28, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 28, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 13, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not properly trained

On March 13, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Curley conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver the findings for the above allegation. LPA met with Resident Services Director, Anne Dasmarinas and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation, staff are not properly trained, according to the reporting party, there have been multiple medication administration errors occurring during the NOC shift after a care staff members was assigned to perform Med-Tech duties without documented medication training. During the investigation, LPA interviewed the Resident Services Director and reviewed training records for all 7 med-techs. According to the Resident Services Director, she reviewed med-techs training records. On 3/6/26, after she discovered Staff 1 (S1), who is a med-tech, did not complete their initial training to assist residents with self-adminisration of medications, she pulled S1 off the schedule. On 3/11/26, after the Resident Services Director discthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 13, 2026 · control 14-AS-20260227122349
Mar 13, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 5, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not provide adequate food service

On March 5, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Curley conducted an unannounced 10-day complaint visit. LPA met with Resident Services Director, Anne Dasmarinas and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation, staff do not provide adequate food service, according to the reporting party, the med-tech requested assistance from the caregiver to check on Resident 1 (R1) who had not eaten his/her breakfast, however the caregiver stated that R1 did not want to get up. According to the reporting party, the med-tech had to go to R1’s room to assess R1 and bring him/her down to the dining room. Furthermore, reporting party stated, R1 was hungry and wanted to go to the dining room. During the investigation, LPA interviewed R1, staff and reviewed R1's service plan. Based on R1's service plan, R1 is independent for meals and food trays are delivered to his/her room for every meal. According to staff interviewed, R1 eats meals in his/her room because he/she likes to be in hthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 5, 2026 · control 14-AS-20260227161900
Mar 5, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 18, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not properly maintain the residents rooms

On February 18, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Curley conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver the findings for the above allegation. LPA met with Community Support Nurse, Shannon Metcalfe and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation, staff did not properly maintain the residents room, according to the reporting party, Resident 1's (R1's) room reeked of urine and the floor was dirty and Resident 2's (R2's) bedroom floor is dirty and sticky. During a complaint visit conducted on 12/12/25, LPA observed R1 and R2's room. Although, R2's room was observed to be clean and odor-free, LPA observed R1's room to have a urine odor. Based on observations made, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be substantiated. Deficiency of the California Code of Regulations, Title, 22 cited on the LIC9099-D. Failure to correct the deficiency may result in civil penalties. Report is reviewed with Community Suthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 18, 2026 · control 14-AS-20251203122307
Jan 27, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff use profanity towards resident.

On January 27, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Curley conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver the findings for the above allegation. LPA met with Regional Sales, Ruth Ocon and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation, staff use profanity towards resident, according to the reporting party, Staff 1 (S1) cursed at Resident 1 (R1). During the investigation, LPA interviewed R1, staff and attempted to interview S1. According to R1, S1 says the F word or use other profanity towards him/her several times. LPA reached out to S1, however was unable to interview S1. According to staff interviewed, he/she witnessed S1 cursing at R1. Based on information collected and file reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be substantiated. Deficiencies of the California Code of Regulations, Title, 22 cited on the LIC9099-D. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Report isthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 27, 2026 · control 14-AS-20260109164112
Jan 27, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 16, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20256 state visits · 6 documents
Jun 17, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure resident's record is up to date.

On June 17, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver the findings for the above allegation. LPA met with Administrator, Shayan Gheisar and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation, staff do not ensure resident's record is up to date, according to the reporting party, Resident 1 (R1) has not seen his/her primary care physician (PCP) in 3 years and records are not up to date. During the investigation, LPA reviewed R1’s file and observed R1’s physician’s report to be from 9/2021. R1 does not have an updated physician’s report as according to the administrator, R1 has not seen his/her PCP or seen a physician since 2021. Based on information collected and file reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be substantiated. Deficiencies of the California Code of Regulations, Title, 22 cited on the LIC9099-D. Failure to correct the deficiencies maythe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 17, 2025 · control 14-AS-20250514093527
Apr 24, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 17, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 4, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 7, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident's dresser is inaccessible Staff did not maintain a comfortable temperature for a resident in care.

On March 7, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver the findings for the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator, Shayan Gheisar and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation, residents dress is inaccessible, according to the reporting party, Resident 1's (R1's) bed is pushed against the dresser and R1 is unable to use it to put his/her clothing inside of it. During the investigation, LPA observed R1's room and observed R1's dresser against R1's bed and LPA was unable to fully open the dresser. Regarding the allegation, staff did not maintain a comfortable temperature for a resident in care, according to the reporting party, it was reported that there is no heat in R1's room since being admitted in December of 2024. (Continue to 9099C). Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 7, 2025 · control 14-AS-20250211164016
Feb 24, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Three resident's eloped due to lack of supervision

On February 24, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver the findings for the above allegation. LPA met with Administrator, Shayan Gheisar and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation, three residents eloped due to lack of supervision, according to the reporting party, four residents have eloped from the facility due to lack of supervision. During the investigation, LPA interviewed administrator and staff. According to administrator and staff, there was a resident (R1) who did leave the facility unassisted once and was found by a caregiver and redirected back to the facility. Based on R1's physician's report reviewed, it was noted R1 had a diagnosis of dementia and is unable to leave the facility unassisted. Family was informed and facility helped family move R1 to a memory care facility. Based on information collected and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, thereforethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 24, 2025 · control 14-AS-20241120141233
20247 state visits · 7 documents
Dec 4, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility faucets used by residents for personal care do not deliver hot water

On December 4, 2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced 10-day complaint visit. LPA met with Administrator, Shayan Ghesiar and Business Office Manager, Natice Coles and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation, facility faucets used by residents for personal care do not deliver hot water, according to the reporting party, the facility has failed to provide adequate bathing shower water temperature above 86 degrees. During the visit, LPA measured water temperature which includes faucets and showers in 5 resident rooms on the first floor and 5 resident rooms on the second floor. Water temperature throughout the facility measured between 105-107.2 degrees F. Based on observations conducted, the department has determined that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Report is reviewethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 4, 2024 · control 14-AS-20241125161351
May 15, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 23, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 9, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 27, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: - Licensee not ensuring that infection control practices are maintained - Facility is malodorous

LPA Jeung met with business office director and resident services director (RSD) and reviewed Infection Control Plan and related staff training. Administrator participated by phone. Based on this investigation--which included observations of supplies of PPE and plastic garbage bags and interviews with staff--these allegations are determined to be unsubstantiated. Although the allegations may have occurred or are valid, there is not enough evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. It cannot be determined that caregivers wear the same gloves when caring for more than one resident, nor that shortage of plastic garbage can liners resulted in offensive odors due to absence of trash can liners. During review and discussion of Infection Control Plan (LIC9282), it is noted that the current Infection Control Preventionist is RSD. Administrator agreed to submit revised ICP and proof of infection control training from a medical professional for RSD. LPA also recommended thatthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 27, 2024 · control 14-AS-20240108140600
Mar 19, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 7, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: - Staff does not ensure residents are spoken to in an appropriate manner - Staff do not ensure residents are served food of good quality and quantity - Staff do not ensure a clean safe environment is provided for residents in care

On 02/07/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jaime Vado conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit in order to deliver fidingings in regards to the allegations received. LPA met with Shayan Gheishar and explained the purpose of today's visit. During the investigation LPA made observations and conudcted interviews. LPA observed the areas under construction dnd did not observe any power tools or supplies in the hallways or walkways of the facility. The facility is renovating some rooms on the second floor. Those rooms are observed to have the doors closed. There was no dust in the hall or walkways the rooms are attached to. The facility kept the doors closed to prevent dust from exiting the rooms. LPA did not smell or observe any toxic items being used during the renovation process and was told that the items being used are legal and approved for such building projects. LPA did not observe any construction dust in the hallway outside of those rooms. No dust was observed onthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 7, 2024 · control 14-AS-20231207160004
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations3typical 1
Type B citations6typical 1
Substantiated complaints8typical 2
Total complaints12typical 7
State visits on file35typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2023.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202671132025663202477020232202022220
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$6,000$9,000 /mo
our estimate — San Mateo County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2026 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (650) 878-5111

Is Serra Highlands Senior Living licensed?

Yes — Serra Highlands Senior Living is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Daly City (San Mateo County): California license #415601127, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 120 residents. State records list 28 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated May 20, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Serra Highlands Senior Living care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Serra Highlands Senior Living with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and hospice care; it does not list dementia / memory care and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 120 NON-AMBULATORY RESIDENTS. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR SIX (6) RESIDENTS. NEW MGT CO, DALY CITY 2 MGR LLC, EFFECTIVE 2/3/25.

How much does Serra Highlands Senior Living cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Serra Highlands Senior Living's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Mateo County typically runs $6,000–$9,000/mo and small board-and-care homes $5,000–$8,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Serra Highlands Senior Living accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Serra Highlands Senior Living is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

50 of 120 beds occupied (42%) when the state visited on March 13, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Serra Highlands Senior Living?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 35 state visits and 28 dated documents since 2022 for Serra Highlands Senior Living; 10 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated March 13, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

10 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not properly trained
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On March 13, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Curley conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver the findings for the above allegation. LPA met with Resident Services Director, Anne Dasmarinas and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation, staff are not properly trained, according to the reporting party, there have been multiple medication administration errors occurring during the NOC shift after a care staff members was assigned to perform Med-Tech duties without documented medication training. During the investigation, LPA interviewed the Resident Services Director and reviewed training records for all 7 med-techs. According to the Resident Services Director, she reviewed med-techs training records. On 3/6/26, after she discovered Staff 1 (S1), who is a med-tech, did not complete their initial training to assist residents with self-adminisration of medications, she pulled S1 off the schedule. On 3/11/26, after the Resident Services Director discCDSS inspection report, March 13, 2026 · control 14-AS-20260227122349
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not provide adequate food service
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On March 5, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Curley conducted an unannounced 10-day complaint visit. LPA met with Resident Services Director, Anne Dasmarinas and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation, staff do not provide adequate food service, according to the reporting party, the med-tech requested assistance from the caregiver to check on Resident 1 (R1) who had not eaten his/her breakfast, however the caregiver stated that R1 did not want to get up. According to the reporting party, the med-tech had to go to R1’s room to assess R1 and bring him/her down to the dining room. Furthermore, reporting party stated, R1 was hungry and wanted to go to the dining room. During the investigation, LPA interviewed R1, staff and reviewed R1's service plan. Based on R1's service plan, R1 is independent for meals and food trays are delivered to his/her room for every meal. According to staff interviewed, R1 eats meals in his/her room because he/she likes to be in hCDSS inspection report, March 5, 2026 · control 14-AS-20260227161900
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not properly maintain the residents rooms
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On February 18, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Curley conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver the findings for the above allegation. LPA met with Community Support Nurse, Shannon Metcalfe and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation, staff did not properly maintain the residents room, according to the reporting party, Resident 1's (R1's) room reeked of urine and the floor was dirty and Resident 2's (R2's) bedroom floor is dirty and sticky. During a complaint visit conducted on 12/12/25, LPA observed R1 and R2's room. Although, R2's room was observed to be clean and odor-free, LPA observed R1's room to have a urine odor. Based on observations made, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be substantiated. Deficiency of the California Code of Regulations, Title, 22 cited on the LIC9099-D. Failure to correct the deficiency may result in civil penalties. Report is reviewed with Community SuCDSS inspection report, February 18, 2026 · control 14-AS-20251203122307
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff use profanity towards resident.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On January 27, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Curley conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver the findings for the above allegation. LPA met with Regional Sales, Ruth Ocon and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation, staff use profanity towards resident, according to the reporting party, Staff 1 (S1) cursed at Resident 1 (R1). During the investigation, LPA interviewed R1, staff and attempted to interview S1. According to R1, S1 says the F word or use other profanity towards him/her several times. LPA reached out to S1, however was unable to interview S1. According to staff interviewed, he/she witnessed S1 cursing at R1. Based on information collected and file reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be substantiated. Deficiencies of the California Code of Regulations, Title, 22 cited on the LIC9099-D. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Report isCDSS inspection report, January 27, 2026 · control 14-AS-20260109164112

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not ensure resident's record is up to date.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On June 17, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver the findings for the above allegation. LPA met with Administrator, Shayan Gheisar and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation, staff do not ensure resident's record is up to date, according to the reporting party, Resident 1 (R1) has not seen his/her primary care physician (PCP) in 3 years and records are not up to date. During the investigation, LPA reviewed R1’s file and observed R1’s physician’s report to be from 9/2021. R1 does not have an updated physician’s report as according to the administrator, R1 has not seen his/her PCP or seen a physician since 2021. Based on information collected and file reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be substantiated. Deficiencies of the California Code of Regulations, Title, 22 cited on the LIC9099-D. Failure to correct the deficiencies mayCDSS inspection report, June 17, 2025 · control 14-AS-20250514093527
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident's dresser is inaccessible Staff did not maintain a comfortable temperature for a resident in care.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On March 7, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver the findings for the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator, Shayan Gheisar and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation, residents dress is inaccessible, according to the reporting party, Resident 1's (R1's) bed is pushed against the dresser and R1 is unable to use it to put his/her clothing inside of it. During the investigation, LPA observed R1's room and observed R1's dresser against R1's bed and LPA was unable to fully open the dresser. Regarding the allegation, staff did not maintain a comfortable temperature for a resident in care, according to the reporting party, it was reported that there is no heat in R1's room since being admitted in December of 2024. (Continue to 9099C). SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 7, 2025 · control 14-AS-20250211164016
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedThree resident's eloped due to lack of supervision
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On February 24, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver the findings for the above allegation. LPA met with Administrator, Shayan Gheisar and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation, three residents eloped due to lack of supervision, according to the reporting party, four residents have eloped from the facility due to lack of supervision. During the investigation, LPA interviewed administrator and staff. According to administrator and staff, there was a resident (R1) who did leave the facility unassisted once and was found by a caregiver and redirected back to the facility. Based on R1's physician's report reviewed, it was noted R1 had a diagnosis of dementia and is unable to leave the facility unassisted. Family was informed and facility helped family move R1 to a memory care facility. Based on information collected and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, thereforeCDSS inspection report, February 24, 2025 · control 14-AS-20241120141233

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility faucets used by residents for personal care do not deliver hot water
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On December 4, 2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced 10-day complaint visit. LPA met with Administrator, Shayan Ghesiar and Business Office Manager, Natice Coles and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation, facility faucets used by residents for personal care do not deliver hot water, according to the reporting party, the facility has failed to provide adequate bathing shower water temperature above 86 degrees. During the visit, LPA measured water temperature which includes faucets and showers in 5 resident rooms on the first floor and 5 resident rooms on the second floor. Water temperature throughout the facility measured between 105-107.2 degrees F. Based on observations conducted, the department has determined that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Report is revieweCDSS inspection report, December 4, 2024 · control 14-AS-20241125161351
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed- Licensee not ensuring that infection control practices are maintained - Facility is malodorous
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
LPA Jeung met with business office director and resident services director (RSD) and reviewed Infection Control Plan and related staff training. Administrator participated by phone. Based on this investigation--which included observations of supplies of PPE and plastic garbage bags and interviews with staff--these allegations are determined to be unsubstantiated. Although the allegations may have occurred or are valid, there is not enough evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. It cannot be determined that caregivers wear the same gloves when caring for more than one resident, nor that shortage of plastic garbage can liners resulted in offensive odors due to absence of trash can liners. During review and discussion of Infection Control Plan (LIC9282), it is noted that the current Infection Control Preventionist is RSD. Administrator agreed to submit revised ICP and proof of infection control training from a medical professional for RSD. LPA also recommended thatCDSS inspection report, March 27, 2024 · control 14-AS-20240108140600
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed- Staff does not ensure residents are spoken to in an appropriate manner - Staff do not ensure residents are served food of good quality and quantity - Staff do not ensure a clean safe environment is provided for residents in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 02/07/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jaime Vado conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit in order to deliver fidingings in regards to the allegations received. LPA met with Shayan Gheishar and explained the purpose of today's visit. During the investigation LPA made observations and conudcted interviews. LPA observed the areas under construction dnd did not observe any power tools or supplies in the hallways or walkways of the facility. The facility is renovating some rooms on the second floor. Those rooms are observed to have the doors closed. There was no dust in the hall or walkways the rooms are attached to. The facility kept the doors closed to prevent dust from exiting the rooms. LPA did not smell or observe any toxic items being used during the renovation process and was told that the items being used are legal and approved for such building projects. LPA did not observe any construction dust in the hallway outside of those rooms. No dust was observed onCDSS inspection report, February 7, 2024 · control 14-AS-20231207160004

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 35 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
3
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
6
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
8
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
12
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
35
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(650) 878-5111
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Serra Highlands Senior Living? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.