Peninsula Del Rey is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Daly City, San Mateo County, California — state license #415601070, licensed for 150 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 16 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated June 2, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

15 homes in view

Peninsula Del Rey

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 150 residents · Daly City, CA · San Mateo County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #415601070, held since 2020 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
165 Pierce Street · Daly City, San Mateo County
Phone
(650) 992-2100
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 140 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 20 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 20 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 10 AMBULATORY, 140 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 20 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. BEDRIDDEN ON FIRST FLOOR ONLY, NON-AMBULATORY ONLY ON FIRST AND SECOND FLOORS ONLY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 20.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 19 times and filed 16 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated June 2, 2026.

Most recent state visit
June 2, 2026
Occupancy at the April 16, 2026 visit
113 of 150 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 8 documents with transcribed findings, dated May 15, 2023 to April 16, 2026. 8 of the 8 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (8). 8 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 8 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 13 of 16 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20262 state visits · 4 documents
Jun 2, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 2, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 16, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not install resident's grab bar

On April 16, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Curley conducted an unannounced 10-day complaint visit. LPA met with Administrator, Katherine Tazawa and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation, staff did not install resident's grab bar, according to the reporting party, on 4/1/26, maintenance director notified Resident 1's (R1’s) responsible party that a grab bar will be installed by R1’s entrance door by 4/2 for reasonable accommodations, however on 4/2 the maintenance director notified R1’s responsible party that he did not have the grab bar available and had to order one. As of 4/7/26, the grab bar has still not been installed in R1’s room. During the visit, LPA reviewed documents, interviewed the administrator, reviewed service order, and observed R1's room. Based on observations, LPA observed the grab bar installed in R1's room by the entrance door. According to the administrator and documents reviewed, on 3/31/26, R1's responsible party emailed Adminthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 16, 2026 · control 14-AS-20260409081451
Apr 16, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20252 state visits · 2 documents
Oct 8, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure that resident was transported to religious services.

On October 8, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Curley conducted an unannounced 10-day complaint inspection. LPA met with Administrator, Katherine Tazawa and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation, staff did not ensure that resident was transported to religious services, according to the reporting party, facility staff cancelled a schedule pick up for Resident 1 (R1) to attend religious services and the facility failed to notify R1 or R1's responsible party. In addition, the reporting party indicated that R1 had to spend $23 on Uber for transportation. During the investigation, LPA interviewed staff and reviewed documents. Based on documents reviewed and staff interviewed, the facility paid for R1's Uber with the facility's funds. Based on interviewed staff, the facility never cancelled transportation for R1. R1's responsible party got upset due to Quickshop being scheduled on Saturday, the same day R1 goes to his/her religious services. According to stathe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 8, 2025 · control 14-AS-20251006120240
Apr 15, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20242 state visits · 4 documents
Aug 15, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff refusing to assist resident with CPAP machine

On 8/15/2024 , Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Grace Donato conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit. LPA met with Executive Director (ED), Katherine Tazawa and explained the purpose of today's visit. Regarding the allegation of facility staff refusing to assist resident with CPAP machine. Reporting party (RP) stated that the resident (R1) has a CPAP machine for sleep apnea that R1 has been struggling to use. RP is reporting that staff have attempted to educate and assist the resident with the CPAP machine twice, however the resident requires additional assistance from staff. Per RP, R1 asked for additional assistance from staff (S1) on 7/22/24 at 3pm, however per RP, S1 "doesn't want to help R1 anymore". Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 15, 2024 · control 14-AS-20240723151606
Aug 15, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff displayed inappropriate behavior while in front of residents in care Staff did not ensure resident received adequate food service Staff does not ensure residents are accorded dignity in their personal relationships with staff, residents, and other persons.

On 8/15/2024 , Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Grace Donato conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit. LPA met with Executive Director (ED), Katherine Tazawa and explained the purpose of today's visit. Regarding the allegations of staff displayed inappropriate behavior while in front of residents in care and Staff did not ensure resident received adequate food service, Reporting party (RP) stated that staff disposed of R1s lunch by aggressively slamming the food into the trash in front of R1 and did not replace the meal with another option resulting in the resident not being provided a meal in the facility. LPA interviewed R1 and it was mentioned that he/she wanted to exchange the meal that was ordered because earlier in the day he/she has already consumed some eggs, so the egg sandwich was too much. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 15, 2024 · control 14-AS-20240724102302
Apr 12, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 12, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20233 state visits · 3 documents
Oct 20, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: - Staff financially abused resident in care - Staff did not adhere to the Admission's Agreement - Staff do not ensure that resident's toileting needs are met

On this day Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jaime Vado conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit in order to deliver findings regarding the allegations received. LPA met with Katherine Tazawa and explained the purpose of today's visit. During the course of the investigation documents were reviewed and interviews were conducted. Due to no further information being received LPA cannot determine if the allegations can be upheld. These allegations are unsubstantatiated. Based on these observations, the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegations are unsubstantiated at this time. Report is reviewed with Katherine Tazawa. Copy is provided. No citations are issued. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 20, 2023 · control 14-AS-20230227091514
Sep 22, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 31, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff do not answer resident's call button in a timely manner.

On August 31, 2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced 10-day complaint visit. LPA met with Administrator, Katherine Tazawa and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation facility staff do not answer resident's call button in a timely manner, according to the reporting party, on 8/20/2023 at around 9:15am, Resident 1 (R1) accidentally touched the service alarm button and the facility staff failed to turn off the service call alarm. During the investigation, LPA interviewed the Administrator, Assisted Living Director, Maria Alcantra, and Business Office Manager, Jed Nallas and they all denied this allegation and indicated that the facility's protocol is, when a service call alarm turns on, the front desk calls the resident's apartment to check to see what the resident needs. According to Administrator, Assisted Living Director and Business Office Manager, it was indicated that when the service call alarm turned on for R1 on 8/20/202the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 31, 2023 · control 14-AS-20230822094152
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 1
Type B citations0typical 1
Substantiated complaints0typical 2
Total complaints8typical 7
State visits on file19typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2020.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20262402025220202424020235502022110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$6,000$9,000 /mo
our estimate — San Mateo County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (650) 992-2100

Is Peninsula Del Rey licensed?

Yes — Peninsula Del Rey is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Daly City (San Mateo County): California license #415601070, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 150 residents. State records list 16 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated June 2, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Peninsula Del Rey care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Peninsula Del Rey with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 10 AMBULATORY, 140 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 20 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. BEDRIDDEN ON FIRST FLOOR ONLY, NON-AMBULATORY ONLY ON FIRST AND SECOND FLOORS ONLY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 20.

How much does Peninsula Del Rey cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Peninsula Del Rey's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Mateo County typically runs $6,000–$9,000/mo and small board-and-care homes $5,000–$8,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Peninsula Del Rey accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Peninsula Del Rey is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

113 of 150 beds occupied (75%) when the state visited on April 16, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Peninsula Del Rey?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 19 state visits and 16 dated documents since 2022 for Peninsula Del Rey; 8 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated April 16, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

8 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not install resident's grab bar
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On April 16, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Curley conducted an unannounced 10-day complaint visit. LPA met with Administrator, Katherine Tazawa and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation, staff did not install resident's grab bar, according to the reporting party, on 4/1/26, maintenance director notified Resident 1's (R1’s) responsible party that a grab bar will be installed by R1’s entrance door by 4/2 for reasonable accommodations, however on 4/2 the maintenance director notified R1’s responsible party that he did not have the grab bar available and had to order one. As of 4/7/26, the grab bar has still not been installed in R1’s room. During the visit, LPA reviewed documents, interviewed the administrator, reviewed service order, and observed R1's room. Based on observations, LPA observed the grab bar installed in R1's room by the entrance door. According to the administrator and documents reviewed, on 3/31/26, R1's responsible party emailed AdminCDSS inspection report, April 16, 2026 · control 14-AS-20260409081451

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure that resident was transported to religious services.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On October 8, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Curley conducted an unannounced 10-day complaint inspection. LPA met with Administrator, Katherine Tazawa and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation, staff did not ensure that resident was transported to religious services, according to the reporting party, facility staff cancelled a schedule pick up for Resident 1 (R1) to attend religious services and the facility failed to notify R1 or R1's responsible party. In addition, the reporting party indicated that R1 had to spend $23 on Uber for transportation. During the investigation, LPA interviewed staff and reviewed documents. Based on documents reviewed and staff interviewed, the facility paid for R1's Uber with the facility's funds. Based on interviewed staff, the facility never cancelled transportation for R1. R1's responsible party got upset due to Quickshop being scheduled on Saturday, the same day R1 goes to his/her religious services. According to staCDSS inspection report, October 8, 2025 · control 14-AS-20251006120240

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff refusing to assist resident with CPAP machine
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 8/15/2024 , Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Grace Donato conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit. LPA met with Executive Director (ED), Katherine Tazawa and explained the purpose of today's visit. Regarding the allegation of facility staff refusing to assist resident with CPAP machine. Reporting party (RP) stated that the resident (R1) has a CPAP machine for sleep apnea that R1 has been struggling to use. RP is reporting that staff have attempted to educate and assist the resident with the CPAP machine twice, however the resident requires additional assistance from staff. Per RP, R1 asked for additional assistance from staff (S1) on 7/22/24 at 3pm, however per RP, S1 "doesn't want to help R1 anymore". UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 15, 2024 · control 14-AS-20240723151606
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff displayed inappropriate behavior while in front of residents in care Staff did not ensure resident received adequate food service Staff does not ensure residents are accorded dignity in their personal relationships with staff, residents, and other persons.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 8/15/2024 , Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Grace Donato conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit. LPA met with Executive Director (ED), Katherine Tazawa and explained the purpose of today's visit. Regarding the allegations of staff displayed inappropriate behavior while in front of residents in care and Staff did not ensure resident received adequate food service, Reporting party (RP) stated that staff disposed of R1s lunch by aggressively slamming the food into the trash in front of R1 and did not replace the meal with another option resulting in the resident not being provided a meal in the facility. LPA interviewed R1 and it was mentioned that he/she wanted to exchange the meal that was ordered because earlier in the day he/she has already consumed some eggs, so the egg sandwich was too much. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 15, 2024 · control 14-AS-20240724102302

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 19 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing. No substantiated complaints are on file.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
0
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
8
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
19
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(650) 992-2100
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Peninsula Del Rey? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.