Trousdale, The is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Burlingame, San Mateo County, California — state license #415601015, licensed for 140 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 14 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated June 30, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

21 homes in view

Trousdale, The

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 140 residents · Burlingame, CA · San Mateo County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #415601015, held since 2018 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
1600 Trousdale Dr · Burlingame, San Mateo County
Phone
(650) 443-3700
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 140 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 12 residents
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 140 NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 12. DELAYED EGRESS APPROVED FOR 3RD FLOOR MEMORY CARE.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 16 times and filed 14 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated June 30, 2026.

Most recent state visit
June 30, 2026
Occupancy at the May 14, 2025 visit
112 of 140 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 5 documents with transcribed findings, dated December 27, 2023 to May 14, 2025. 5 of the 5 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (3), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 5 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 5 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 12 of 14 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20261 state visit · 1 document
Jun 30, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20253 state visits · 5 documents
Dec 10, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 14, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff mismanaging resident’s medication. Staff did not ensure resident’s medications were refilled in a timely manner.

On May 14, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Murial Han conducted an unannounced visit to deliver the findings of a complaint investigation. LPA met with Memory Care Director and explained the purpose of today’s visit. Regarding to the allegation of- Staff mismanaging resident’s medication, the reporting party stated that resident #1 (R1)’s responsible party witnessed staff #1 (S1) who was in training gave all of R1’s medication to R1 at once in R1’s hand resulted R1 struggled not to drop the medications and almost lost a medication in R1’s recliner. According to the responsible party, S1 placed all R1’s medications on R1’s palm so when R1 tried to take it one by one, R1 almost dropped it, however, R1 was able to manage not to drop any and S1 stayed with until R1 took all of the medications. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 14, 2025 · control 14-AS-20250402145926
Jan 14, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure that resident took medication as prescribed Resident sustained injuries during an witnessed fall due to staff neglect

On January 14, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Murial Han conducted an unannounced visit to delivery the complaint investigation findings. LPA met with Memory Care Director and LPA explained the purpose of today's visit. Regarding to the allegation of- staff did not ensure resident took medication as prescribed, the reporting party stated on 11/20/2024 at 7:18PM, resident-in-question (R1) was on the phone with the responsible party who overheard the Medication Technician (Med Tech) did not ensure R1 took the medication by leaving the medication with R1 and left the room. The reporting party stated that this concern has been brought up by the responsible party to the facility director(s) in the past to ensure R1 took the medication before staff leaving the room. As part of the investigation, LPA interviewed the memory care director and other residents. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 14, 2025 · control 14-AS-20241212164653
Jan 14, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not seek medical attention for resident in a timely manner resulting in a questionable death Staff did not keep the residents authorized person informed regarding the resident's hospitalization

On January 14, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Murial Han conducted an unannounced visit to deliver the investigation findings. LPA met with Memory Care Director and LPA explained the purpose of today's visit. Regarding to the allegation of- staff did not seek medical attention for resident in a timely manner resulting in a questionable death, the reporting party stated that on 11/13/2024, the facility did not complete a safety check on resident #1 (R1) during change of shift around 6:30 am resulting R1 being on the floor for hours instead of receiving immediate medical attention. As part of the investigation. LPA interviewed the memory care director who stated that R1 did not require any assistance with medication management, activities of daily living, and etc. Therefore, the facility was only providing daily safety checks on each shift at varies times during the shift. The memory care director stated that the safety checks were not scheduled. In addition, the memory care directhe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 14, 2025 · control 14-AS-20241127162037
Jan 14, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20243 state visits · 4 documents
Dec 3, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 3, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 19, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff mismanaged resident medication

On June 19, 2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Murial Han conducted a 10-day complaint visit. LPA met with the Business Office Manager upon arrival and explained the purpose of the visit. Momentarily, the Memory Care Coordinator, Anne Aquino arrived and assisted with the complaint investigation. As part of the investigation, LPA interviewed facility staff, resident-in-question (R1) and reviewed documents. Regarding to allegation of staff mismanaged resident medication, the reporting party stated that in October 2023, R1 received 2 shots of flu and COVID-19 vaccines on the same day and the second part of this allegation, the reporting party stated that R1 recently found a medication/pill on the floor in his/her room and it was returned to one of the Medication Technicians (Med Tech) on the same day and this has happened in the past. In addition, the reporting party stated that there should not be any mediation in R1's room as the facility was managing R1's medication. According to tthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 19, 2024 · control 14-AS-20240617151929
Jan 9, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20231 state visit · 2 documents
Dec 27, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility did not follow residents care plan regarding alcohol

On December 27, 2023 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Murial Han conducted an unannounced visit to deliver the investigation findings to complaint number 14-AS-20231030105833. LPA met with the administrator and explained the purpose of today's visit. Regarding to allegation of facility did not follow resident's care plan regarding to alcohol, the reporting party reported that upon admission, it was stated in resident #1 (R1)'s care that R1 shouldn't be served alcohol and facility continued to give R1 alcohol despite being reminded by family. As part of the investigation, LPA interviewed administrator, facility director, staff, and reviewed documents. According to the administrator, facility director and staff, R1's was served a minimal amount of alcohol during facility's daily Happy Hour event until a few months ago when they obtained an order from R1's physician stating that R1 was not supposed to have alcohol. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 27, 2023 · control 14-AS-20231030105833
Dec 27, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations5typical 1
Type B citations0typical 1
Substantiated complaints4typical 2
Total complaints5typical 7
State visits on file16typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2018.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20261102025351202434120232312021110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$6,000$9,000 /mo
our estimate — San Mateo County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (650) 443-3700

Is Trousdale, The licensed?

Yes — Trousdale, The is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Burlingame (San Mateo County): California license #415601015, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 140 residents. State records list 14 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated June 30, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Trousdale, The care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Trousdale, The with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, and hospice care; it does not list bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 140 NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 12. DELAYED EGRESS APPROVED FOR 3RD FLOOR MEMORY CARE.

How much does Trousdale, The cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Trousdale, The's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Mateo County typically runs $6,000–$9,000/mo and small board-and-care homes $5,000–$8,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Trousdale, The accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Trousdale, The is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

112 of 140 beds occupied (80%) when the state visited on May 14, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Trousdale, The?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 16 state visits and 14 dated documents since 2021 for Trousdale, The; 5 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated May 14, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

5 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff mismanaging resident’s medication. Staff did not ensure resident’s medications were refilled in a timely manner.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On May 14, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Murial Han conducted an unannounced visit to deliver the findings of a complaint investigation. LPA met with Memory Care Director and explained the purpose of today’s visit. Regarding to the allegation of- Staff mismanaging resident’s medication, the reporting party stated that resident #1 (R1)’s responsible party witnessed staff #1 (S1) who was in training gave all of R1’s medication to R1 at once in R1’s hand resulted R1 struggled not to drop the medications and almost lost a medication in R1’s recliner. According to the responsible party, S1 placed all R1’s medications on R1’s palm so when R1 tried to take it one by one, R1 almost dropped it, however, R1 was able to manage not to drop any and S1 stayed with until R1 took all of the medications. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 14, 2025 · control 14-AS-20250402145926
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure that resident took medication as prescribed Resident sustained injuries during an witnessed fall due to staff neglect
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On January 14, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Murial Han conducted an unannounced visit to delivery the complaint investigation findings. LPA met with Memory Care Director and LPA explained the purpose of today's visit. Regarding to the allegation of- staff did not ensure resident took medication as prescribed, the reporting party stated on 11/20/2024 at 7:18PM, resident-in-question (R1) was on the phone with the responsible party who overheard the Medication Technician (Med Tech) did not ensure R1 took the medication by leaving the medication with R1 and left the room. The reporting party stated that this concern has been brought up by the responsible party to the facility director(s) in the past to ensure R1 took the medication before staff leaving the room. As part of the investigation, LPA interviewed the memory care director and other residents. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 14, 2025 · control 14-AS-20241212164653
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not seek medical attention for resident in a timely manner resulting in a questionable death Staff did not keep the residents authorized person informed regarding the resident's hospitalization
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On January 14, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Murial Han conducted an unannounced visit to deliver the investigation findings. LPA met with Memory Care Director and LPA explained the purpose of today's visit. Regarding to the allegation of- staff did not seek medical attention for resident in a timely manner resulting in a questionable death, the reporting party stated that on 11/13/2024, the facility did not complete a safety check on resident #1 (R1) during change of shift around 6:30 am resulting R1 being on the floor for hours instead of receiving immediate medical attention. As part of the investigation. LPA interviewed the memory care director who stated that R1 did not require any assistance with medication management, activities of daily living, and etc. Therefore, the facility was only providing daily safety checks on each shift at varies times during the shift. The memory care director stated that the safety checks were not scheduled. In addition, the memory care direcCDSS inspection report, January 14, 2025 · control 14-AS-20241127162037

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff mismanaged resident medication
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On June 19, 2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Murial Han conducted a 10-day complaint visit. LPA met with the Business Office Manager upon arrival and explained the purpose of the visit. Momentarily, the Memory Care Coordinator, Anne Aquino arrived and assisted with the complaint investigation. As part of the investigation, LPA interviewed facility staff, resident-in-question (R1) and reviewed documents. Regarding to allegation of staff mismanaged resident medication, the reporting party stated that in October 2023, R1 received 2 shots of flu and COVID-19 vaccines on the same day and the second part of this allegation, the reporting party stated that R1 recently found a medication/pill on the floor in his/her room and it was returned to one of the Medication Technicians (Med Tech) on the same day and this has happened in the past. In addition, the reporting party stated that there should not be any mediation in R1's room as the facility was managing R1's medication. According to tCDSS inspection report, June 19, 2024 · control 14-AS-20240617151929

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not follow residents care plan regarding alcohol
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On December 27, 2023 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Murial Han conducted an unannounced visit to deliver the investigation findings to complaint number 14-AS-20231030105833. LPA met with the administrator and explained the purpose of today's visit. Regarding to allegation of facility did not follow resident's care plan regarding to alcohol, the reporting party reported that upon admission, it was stated in resident #1 (R1)'s care that R1 shouldn't be served alcohol and facility continued to give R1 alcohol despite being reminded by family. As part of the investigation, LPA interviewed administrator, facility director, staff, and reviewed documents. According to the administrator, facility director and staff, R1's was served a minimal amount of alcohol during facility's daily Happy Hour event until a few months ago when they obtained an order from R1's physician stating that R1 was not supposed to have alcohol. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 27, 2023 · control 14-AS-20231030105833

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 16 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
5
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
4
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
5
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
16
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(650) 443-3700
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Trousdale, The? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.