Oaks At Nipomo, The is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Nipomo, San Luis Obispo County, California — state license #405809547, licensed for 122 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 36 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated July 10, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.
No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.
Since 2021, the state has visited this home 47 times and filed 36 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated July 10, 2026.
The state's published file for this home includes 19 documents with transcribed findings, dated July 21, 2021 to October 1, 2025. 19 of the 19 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (10), “Unsubstantiated” (9). 19 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.
Summary composed by computer from the 19 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
What the state’s words mean
Jul 10, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Jul 9, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Jul 8, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Apr 22, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Apr 7, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Feb 26, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Feb 26, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Jan 27, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Nov 25, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Oct 1, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility doors are unsafe for residents in care. Staff are not following residents admission agreements.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melisa Rankin conducted an unannounced visit to initiate a complaint investigation regarding the above-mentioned allegations. LPA met with Ronald Freeman, to discuss the purpose of the visit and elements of the complaint. During the visit LPA collected staff schedules and observed and tested the function of external doors, interviewed 4 residents, 8 staff, a director and the administrator. LPA also toured restrooms, common areas, and a resident room. On the allegation: Staff are not following residents admission agreements. It was alleged that due to a lack of staffing the residents are not receiving weekly housekeeping and laundry services as stated in their admission agreements. Reporting party (RP) reported that residents are having to wash their own bedding when housekeeping is not available. Continued on 9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 1, 2025 · control 29-AS-20250924222649
Oct 1, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Sep 3, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility failed to follow reporting requirements
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rankin conducted a required 10-day complaint visit to the above facility. LPA met with Administrator Ron Freeman and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA was notified of possible outbreak on August 21st via correspondence with the Administrator. The administrator stated in correspondence that the county has also been contacted, and he was waiting for a response. During the complaint visit LPA interviewed the administrator, Memory care director, 10 staff, and 8 residents. LPA toured common area of the facility while speaking with staff and residents. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 3, 2025 · control 29-AS-20250827080301
Jul 2, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Licensee does not ensure that resident's are provided with an adequate supply of hygiene items while in care. Licensee does not ensure that resident is provided appropriate activities while in care.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rankin conducted a subsequent complaint visit to the facility above to issue final findings. LPA met with Ronald Freeman, Administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. During the initial visit on 6/23/25 from 10:55 am to 3:00 pm, LPA Rankin toured the memory care unit at the facility, interviewed two (2) staff, one (1) resident from Memory Care, and two (2) residents from Assisted Living, observed Memory Care residents and the activities, and obtained relevant documents. Additional interviews were conducted with relevant parties on 6/20/25, and 7/1/25. During return visit LPA re-toured the memory care unit and specifically 21 resident restrooms and two (2) staff/resident restrooms. LPA interviewed three (3) staff and one (1) director. (pg1) Continued 9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 2, 2025 · control 29-AS-20250619151313
Jun 30, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility did not seek timely medical care for resident Facility did not meets resident's needs Facility did not provide adequate supervision Facility did not observe change of condition in resident Facility did not conduct reappraisal of resident
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rankin conducted a subsequent complaint visit to issue final findings on this investigation. LPA met with Ronald Freeman and explained the purpose of the visit. During the investigation, LPA conducted an initial visit on 7/2/2024 from 2:14pm to 4:30pm where LPA conducted interview with administrator and obtained relevant documents. LPA conducted a visit on 5/29/25 from 12:11pm to 3:17pm, where LPA again interviewed administrator, and re-reviewed records. Additional staff interviews were conducted via phone on 5/30/25 at 1:09 to 1:52 p.m., in person on 6/23/25 at approximately 12:52pm to 1:10pm, and via phone on 6/26/25 at 10:24am to 10:32am and 12:19pm to 12:39pm. LPA attempted to call/interview nine staff listed on the staff roster who were staff in the memory care unit during the timeframe Resident 1 (R1) resided in the facility. Four of those staff were interviewed and the remaining five staff were contacted, but did not respond to requests for intervthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 30, 2025 · control 29-AS-20240628143308
May 29, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Feb 27, 2025Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility staff handle resident in a rough manner.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) De Leon conducted a subsequent complaint visit to the facility above. LPA met with Administrator Ronald Freeman and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA De Leon conducted the initial 10-day complaint visit, toured facility memory care unit, observed lunch service, requested records and interviewed staff at 10:45am, 11:00am, 12:40pm, 1:10pm, 1:20pm, 2:52pm and 3:11pm and interviewed residents at 11:20am, 11:45am, 2:00p and 2:20pm. LPA conducted a subsequnet complaint visit on 02/27/2025 and interviewed additonal staff from 10:45am-1:30pm. On the allegation: Facility staff handle resident in a rough manner. LPA De Leon interviewed staff, residents, and reviewed facility memory care records for staff and residents. Staff interviews revealed 1 out of 7 staff heard about an incident with a new NOC Caregiver Staff handling a resident roughly. Continued 9099-C Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 27, 2025 · control 29-AS-20250203141805
Feb 27, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide a proper eviction notice to resident in care
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) De Leon conducted a subsequent complaint visit to the facility above. LPA met with Administrator Ronald Freeman and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA De Leon conducted the initial 10-day complaint visit, toured facility, requested records and interviewed staff at 10:45am, 11:00am, 12:40pm, 1:10pm, 1:20pm, 2:52pm and 3:11pm and interviewed residents at 11:20am, 11:45am, 2:00p and 2:20pm. LPA conducted a subsequent visit and interviewed staff and residents from 10:45am-1:30 pm. On then allegation: Staff did not provide a proper eviction to resident in care. LPA reviewed records regarding Resident 1’s (R1’s) eviction letter, Admission Agreement with Resident Handbook, and House Rules, and Letters to R1 from the facility, as well as interviewed staff and residents. Continued 9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 27, 2025 · control 29-AS-20250130150442
Oct 22, 2024Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff handled resident in a rough manner Staff did not assist with medication as prescribed Staff did not address a resident's change in medical condition
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Erika Miller (Miller) conducted an unannounced complaint visit and issued final findings on the allegations above. During the investigation, LPA Miller, toured the facility and interviewed staff, and residents on October 22, 2024. LPA reviewed relevant documents. LPA met with Ronald Freeman, administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. On the allegation: Staff handled resident in a rough manner Reporting party (RP) alleges that they observed Resident 1 (R1), to be in severe pain and directed staff to stop their actions, (i.e.), stop changing R1’s brief. Continued on 9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 22, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240403105525
Aug 28, 2024Substantiated
Allegation investigated: The facility apartments not being kept clean and free from odors. Facility staffing is not sufficient in dining to meet the needs of the residents
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) De Leon conducted a subsequent complaint visit to the facility above to deliver final findings of the complaint investigation. LPA met with Ron Freeman, Administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA De Leon conducted the initial complaint visit on 12/11/2023 toured the 2nd floor, requested records, conducted interview with staff at 11:05am, 11:30am, 11:45am, 12:00pm, 12:30pm, 12:45pm, 1:00pm and 1:30pm and residents at 2:52pm and 3:00pm. On the allegation: The facility apartments not being kept clean and free from odors. LPA conducted interviews with staff and residents which revealed a 2nd floor apartment had foul odors. On 04/29/2024 an incident report was provided to LPA Miller that R1 was transported to the hospital for mental health evaluation. Administrator stated R1 did not return to the facility after that date. Continued 9099-C Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 28, 2024 · control 29-AS-20231204161250
Aug 27, 2024Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility staff handles residents in a rough manner resulting in skin tears. Facility staff using profanity towards residents. Facility staff does not wear gloves when preparing food.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) De Leon conducted a subsequent complaint visit to the facility above to deliver final findings in the complaint investigation. LPA met with Ronald Freeman Administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA De Leon conducted the initial investigation on 01/20/2023, LPA toured the kitchen with Administrator, LPA collected the following records: Resident Roster with telephone numbers, Staff Roster with Telephone numbers, Staff schedule for January 2023 for Kitchen staff, caregivers and med-tech's, Kitchen menu, Kitchen cleaning checklist, Any disciplinary records for staff 1 (S1) or any other staff using profanity, any incident reports of Residents with food poisoning, Any resident evictions for January 2023, and Infection Control Training Records for all staff, LPA interviewed staff at 1:19pm, 2:02pm, 2:20pm, 2:45pm, and 3:20pm. Continued 9099-C Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 27, 2024 · control 29-AS-20230119132542
Aug 23, 2024Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility refused to provide transportation for the resident's appointment.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rankin conducted a subsequent complaint visit to the facility above to issue final findings. LPA met with Ronald Freeman and explained the purpose of the visit. During the investigation, LPA Rankin conducted an initial visit on 8/19/24 from 10:58am to 2:15pm, toured the common areas of the facility, interviewed staff, interviewed residents, and obtained documents. LPA conducted additional interview with resident 1 (R1) on 8/23/2023 at 9:05 am. Continued to 9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 23, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240813082147
Jul 11, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Jun 19, 2024Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff do not assist residents with showering. Staff do not answer residents' pendants in a timely manner.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) De Leon conducted a subsequent complaint visit to the facility above to deliver final findings of the complaint investigation. LPA met Raquel Counsins, Memory Care Director with and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA De Leon conducted the initial 10-day visit on 12/13/2022 at 9:30am, LPA conducted staff interviews at 10:30am, 12:30pm, 1:10pm, 2:30pm, and collected records requested. On 08/23/2023 LPA De Leon conducted a subsequent visit to the facility interviewed staff at 10:15am, 11:10am, 11:50am, 12:05pm, 1:05pm, 1:20pm, 1:40pm, 2:20pm, 3:30pm, 4:15pm and interviewed residents at 12:15pm, 12:30pm, 12:45pm, 2:55pm, On 08/24/2023 collected records, conducted interviews with staff 11:18am, with residents at 12:20pm, 12:40pm, 1:45pm, 2:12pm, 3:15pm, 5:00pm and 5:37pm. Continued 9099-C Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 19, 2024 · control 29-AS-20221205120051
Feb 8, 2024Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not discard contaminated food.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Erika Miller (Miller) conducted an unannounced complaint visit and issued final findings on the allegations above. During the investigation, LPA, Miller, toured the Memory Care Unit and interviewed staff, and residents on February 8, 2024, from 1:39 p.m. to 3:15 p.m. LPA also obtained and reviewed relevant documents. LPA met with Ronald Freeman, administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. On the allegation: Staff did not discard Contaminated food. On February 5, 2024, a witness visited the facility, and observed open containers of food in the small fridge in the pantry area, including a container with mold growing on it. See photograph of moldy juice box. The memory care director stated that staff is instructed to check the refrigerator on a daily basis. In addition, the NOC shift in memory care is required to go through the refrigerator and check for expired foods once a week as outlined in the NOC Caregiver Duties check list. In the event, fothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 8, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240206161459
Sep 15, 2023Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility does not provide adequate amounts of toilet paper to residents in care.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) De Leon conducted a subsequent complaint visit to the facility above to deliver final findings of the complaint investigation. LPA met with the Administrator Ron Freeman and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA De Leon conducted the initial complaint visit on 08/23/2023, LPA requested staff roster with telephone numbers, resident roster, invoices for billing of toilet paper for 2022-2023, staff schedule for August 2023 all departments. The administrator provided all the above except the invoices for toilet paper as none of the residents have been billed for toilet paper. The facility does provide housekeeping 1 day a week in each resident’s room and the housekeepers are instructed to put toilet paper if the resident’s bathroom if it does not have any. The Admission Agreement was reviewed, and it does not state the facility provides toilet paper free of charge and it does not state toilet paper is an extra charge. LPA interviewed staff on 08/23/2023 arthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 15, 2023 · control 29-AS-20230816143650
Year-by-year trend
Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.
No Google listing is on file for this home. When one exists, its rating, review themes, and hours appear here — attributed to Google, never blended with the state record, and never part of how we rank homes.
This home hasn’t added its own details yet. When the operator claims this page, their photos, tour video, activities, languages, and staffing answers appear here — always labeled as theirs, never blended with the state record. Operators: claim your home, free →
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Is Oaks At Nipomo, The licensed?
Yes — Oaks At Nipomo, The is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Nipomo (San Luis Obispo County): California license #405809547, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 122 residents. State records list 36 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated July 10, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.
Can Oaks At Nipomo, The care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?
From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.
The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Oaks At Nipomo, The with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.
From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.
What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 122 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 12 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 12.
How much does Oaks At Nipomo, The cost?
California's public licensing record does not include Oaks At Nipomo, The's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Luis Obispo County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.
Does Oaks At Nipomo, The accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?
Oaks At Nipomo, The is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.
Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →
101 of 122 beds occupied (83%) when the state visited on October 1, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.
What do state inspections show for Oaks At Nipomo, The?
Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.
The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 47 state visits and 36 dated documents since 2021 for Oaks At Nipomo, The; 19 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated October 1, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated”. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.
Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.
2025
2024
2023
Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.
What the state has logged
California has logged 47 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.
You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.
(805) 723-5206Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.
Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →
See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →
This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →
Do you run Oaks At Nipomo, The? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.