Village At Sydney Creek, The is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in San Luis Obispo, San Luis Obispo County, California — state license #405800577, licensed for 84 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 26 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated July 16, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

12 homes in view

Village At Sydney Creek, The

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 84 residents · San Luis Obispo, CA · San Luis Obispo County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #405800577, held since 2000 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
1234 Laurel Lane · San Luis Obispo, San Luis Obispo County
Phone
(805) 543-2350
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
sydneycreek.com
listed by the county Area Agency on Aging
Listing details can lag reality — confirm anything important by phone.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 84 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 20 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 84 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
84 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 84 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. APPROVED FOR DELAYED EGRESS. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 20.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 31 times and filed 26 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated July 16, 2026.

Most recent state visit
July 16, 2026
Occupancy at the June 19, 2025 visit
54 of 84 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 16 documents with transcribed findings, dated August 2, 2021 to June 19, 2025. 16 of the 16 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (5), “Unsubstantiated” (11). 16 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 16 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 14 of 26 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20262 state visits · 4 documents
Jul 16, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 27, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 27, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 27, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20252 state visits · 3 documents
Jun 19, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee does not ensure that facility faucets used by residents for personal care deliver hot water. Staff do not ensure that resident's needs are met. Staff do not ensure that the facility is sanitized.

On 6/19/2025 at 09:43am Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Haner-Tomasko arrived unannounced at the facility to further investigate the allegations to this complaint. LPA met with Administrator Liza Hix and explained the purpose of the visit. During the visit, from 1:30pm to 3:40pm LPA interviewed staff, clients, administrator, Vice President of Operations, and obtained relevant documents. On the allegation: Licensee does not ensure that facility faucets used by residents for personal care deliver hot water. It was alleged that off and on for several years the facility has had a problem with the faucets delivering hot water and now it is happening more frequently, resulting in residents needing to take cold showers. LPA noted the facility has a boiler room off the main kitchen. (Continued on LIC9099-C) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 19, 2025 · control 29-AS-20250616114812
Jun 19, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 18, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20246 state visits · 7 documents
Sep 3, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not following infection control protocol

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rankin conducted a visit to the facility above to conduct a required 10-day visit for a complaint. LPA met with Liza Hix and explained the purpose of the visit. During the investigation, LPA Rankin conducted a tour all 3 memory care neighborhoods. LPA reviewed 8 resident rooms, specifically rooms where dual residents reside or rooms that were found open for residents to wander in and out of. LPA also conducted interviews with the Administrator and the Wellness Coordinator, and obtained documents of, Sydney Creek Policies, Plan for Epidemic Outbreak Mitigation and the Plan of Operation (2012). Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 3, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240828153748
Aug 28, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 30, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 5, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff prevent resident from having visitors. Staff do not allow resident to send mail. Staff prevent resident from making/receiving confidential phone calls. Staff do not maintain the facility in clean and sanitary condition.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Erika Miller (Miller) conducted an unannounced complaint visit on March 13, 2024. On June 5, 2024, LPA issued final findings on the allegations above. During the investigation, LPA Miller toured the facility and interviewed staff and residents on March 13, 2024, from 10:15 a.m. to 12:40 p.m. LPA also obtained and reviewed relevant documents. LPA met with Liza Hix, administrator, and explained the purpose of the visit. On the allegation: Staff prevent resident from having visitors. It was alleged that facility staff turned away Resident 1 (R1)’s visitor in January 2024. Administrator stated they never restrict visitors. Administrator stated R1’s family advised that Person 1 (P1), a former caregiver, may try to visit R1 but they have suspicions and asked the facility to keep an eye on P1. On P1’s first visit to the facility, staff overheard P1 say to R1 they will sneak R1 out of the facility. On P1’s second visit, staff observed P1 trying to get R1 to signthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 5, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240307135052
Apr 24, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff does not make dangerous items inaccessible to the residents

During the investigation, LPA toured the facility on April 24, 2024 from 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. LPA also obtained and reviewed relevant documents. LPA met with Lisa Hulse (Hulse), vice president of operations and explained the purpose of the visit. On April 16, 2024, a witness visited the facility and observed an accessible bathroom cabinet in Neighborhood 1. The witness observed an unlocked cabinet that contained an uncovered toothbrush, toothpaste tube, and an aerosol can. On the second shelf the witness observed 2 electric shavers and an electric curling iron. Witness also observed a full gallon of hand soap on the bathroom counter. Hulse stated that the facility policy requires that items that may pose a danger must be made inaccessible to clients. Hulse stated that she has reminded staff of regulations. (Cont. 9099 C) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 24, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240417090505
Feb 8, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility is not meeting the medical needs of residents

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Olson conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver final findings for the above allegation. LPA Olson interviewed Staff on 1/29/24 and 2/8/24, LPA attempted to interview Residents and requested relevant documents on 1/29/24. During today’s visit, LPA met with Vice President and explained the reason for the visit. On the allegation: Facility is not meeting the medical needs of residents. It was alleged that a resident’s ability to use their hand declined due to a brace not worn and exercises not done, and the resident’s nails were not maintained and dug into the skin of their palm. It was also alleged that a resident has a skin condition that was not properly being addressed by the facility. LPA interviewed LVN who stated most residents see the same doctor who sends their nurse practitioner to the facility once a week. They have their own list of residents to follow up with, as well as the facility’s list of residents we would like them to look into.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 8, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240125085421
Feb 8, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility does not have enough staff to meet residents’ needs.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Olson conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver final findings for the above allegation. LPA Chavez interviewed Administrator on 12/28/22 and 12/30/22, requested and reviewed documents on 12/28/22. LPA Olson interviewed Staff on 2/8/24 and requested relevant documents. During today’s visit, LPA met with Vice President and explained the reason for the visit. On the allegation: Facility does not have enough staff to meet residents’ needs. It was alleged that on 12/17/22 there was one employee in Neighborhood 2, which has approximately 15 residents. Administrator states in Neighborhood 1 there are 20 residents and 3 staff on AM and PM shifts, 1-3 staff on the NOC shift; Neighborhood 2 has 16 residents, 3 staff on AM and PM, and 1-3 staff on NOC; and Neighborhood 3 has 15 residents,1 concierge, 2 staff on AM and PM shift and 1-3 staff on NOC. LPA observed the schedule for 12/17/22 and observed 8 total staff scheduled for AM and 7 total staff schedulethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 8, 2024 · control 29-AS-20221221173142
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations2typical 1
Type B citations2typical 1
Substantiated complaints6typical 2
Total complaints13typical 7
State visits on file31typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2000.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202624020252302024670202334020227942021221
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — San Luis Obispo County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (805) 543-2350

Is Village At Sydney Creek, The licensed?

Yes — Village At Sydney Creek, The is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in San Luis Obispo (San Luis Obispo County): California license #405800577, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 84 residents. State records list 26 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated July 16, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Village At Sydney Creek, The care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Village At Sydney Creek, The with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license record84 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 84 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. APPROVED FOR DELAYED EGRESS. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 20.

How much does Village At Sydney Creek, The cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Village At Sydney Creek, The's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Luis Obispo County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Village At Sydney Creek, The accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Village At Sydney Creek, The is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

54 of 84 beds occupied (64%) when the state visited on June 19, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Village At Sydney Creek, The?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 31 state visits and 26 dated documents since 2021 for Village At Sydney Creek, The; 16 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated June 19, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

16 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee does not ensure that facility faucets used by residents for personal care deliver hot water. Staff do not ensure that resident's needs are met. Staff do not ensure that the facility is sanitized.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 6/19/2025 at 09:43am Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Haner-Tomasko arrived unannounced at the facility to further investigate the allegations to this complaint. LPA met with Administrator Liza Hix and explained the purpose of the visit. During the visit, from 1:30pm to 3:40pm LPA interviewed staff, clients, administrator, Vice President of Operations, and obtained relevant documents. On the allegation: Licensee does not ensure that facility faucets used by residents for personal care deliver hot water. It was alleged that off and on for several years the facility has had a problem with the faucets delivering hot water and now it is happening more frequently, resulting in residents needing to take cold showers. LPA noted the facility has a boiler room off the main kitchen. (Continued on LIC9099-C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, June 19, 2025 · control 29-AS-20250616114812

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not following infection control protocol
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rankin conducted a visit to the facility above to conduct a required 10-day visit for a complaint. LPA met with Liza Hix and explained the purpose of the visit. During the investigation, LPA Rankin conducted a tour all 3 memory care neighborhoods. LPA reviewed 8 resident rooms, specifically rooms where dual residents reside or rooms that were found open for residents to wander in and out of. LPA also conducted interviews with the Administrator and the Wellness Coordinator, and obtained documents of, Sydney Creek Policies, Plan for Epidemic Outbreak Mitigation and the Plan of Operation (2012). UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 3, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240828153748
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff prevent resident from having visitors. Staff do not allow resident to send mail. Staff prevent resident from making/receiving confidential phone calls. Staff do not maintain the facility in clean and sanitary condition.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Erika Miller (Miller) conducted an unannounced complaint visit on March 13, 2024. On June 5, 2024, LPA issued final findings on the allegations above. During the investigation, LPA Miller toured the facility and interviewed staff and residents on March 13, 2024, from 10:15 a.m. to 12:40 p.m. LPA also obtained and reviewed relevant documents. LPA met with Liza Hix, administrator, and explained the purpose of the visit. On the allegation: Staff prevent resident from having visitors. It was alleged that facility staff turned away Resident 1 (R1)’s visitor in January 2024. Administrator stated they never restrict visitors. Administrator stated R1’s family advised that Person 1 (P1), a former caregiver, may try to visit R1 but they have suspicions and asked the facility to keep an eye on P1. On P1’s first visit to the facility, staff overheard P1 say to R1 they will sneak R1 out of the facility. On P1’s second visit, staff observed P1 trying to get R1 to signCDSS inspection report, June 5, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240307135052
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff does not make dangerous items inaccessible to the residents
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
During the investigation, LPA toured the facility on April 24, 2024 from 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. LPA also obtained and reviewed relevant documents. LPA met with Lisa Hulse (Hulse), vice president of operations and explained the purpose of the visit. On April 16, 2024, a witness visited the facility and observed an accessible bathroom cabinet in Neighborhood 1. The witness observed an unlocked cabinet that contained an uncovered toothbrush, toothpaste tube, and an aerosol can. On the second shelf the witness observed 2 electric shavers and an electric curling iron. Witness also observed a full gallon of hand soap on the bathroom counter. Hulse stated that the facility policy requires that items that may pose a danger must be made inaccessible to clients. Hulse stated that she has reminded staff of regulations. (Cont. 9099 C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 24, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240417090505
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is not meeting the medical needs of residents
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Olson conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver final findings for the above allegation. LPA Olson interviewed Staff on 1/29/24 and 2/8/24, LPA attempted to interview Residents and requested relevant documents on 1/29/24. During today’s visit, LPA met with Vice President and explained the reason for the visit. On the allegation: Facility is not meeting the medical needs of residents. It was alleged that a resident’s ability to use their hand declined due to a brace not worn and exercises not done, and the resident’s nails were not maintained and dug into the skin of their palm. It was also alleged that a resident has a skin condition that was not properly being addressed by the facility. LPA interviewed LVN who stated most residents see the same doctor who sends their nurse practitioner to the facility once a week. They have their own list of residents to follow up with, as well as the facility’s list of residents we would like them to look into.CDSS inspection report, February 8, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240125085421
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility does not have enough staff to meet residents’ needs.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Olson conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver final findings for the above allegation. LPA Chavez interviewed Administrator on 12/28/22 and 12/30/22, requested and reviewed documents on 12/28/22. LPA Olson interviewed Staff on 2/8/24 and requested relevant documents. During today’s visit, LPA met with Vice President and explained the reason for the visit. On the allegation: Facility does not have enough staff to meet residents’ needs. It was alleged that on 12/17/22 there was one employee in Neighborhood 2, which has approximately 15 residents. Administrator states in Neighborhood 1 there are 20 residents and 3 staff on AM and PM shifts, 1-3 staff on the NOC shift; Neighborhood 2 has 16 residents, 3 staff on AM and PM, and 1-3 staff on NOC; and Neighborhood 3 has 15 residents,1 concierge, 2 staff on AM and PM shift and 1-3 staff on NOC. LPA observed the schedule for 12/17/22 and observed 8 total staff scheduled for AM and 7 total staff scheduleCDSS inspection report, February 8, 2024 · control 29-AS-20221221173142

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility exposes residents to hazardous facility grounds conditions
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 7/14/23 at 10:43 am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Chavez conducted an unannounced 10-day complaint visit to the facility listed above. LPA met with Kirk Klotthor, Administrator, and explained the purpose of the visit. On the allegation, “Facility exposes residents to hazardous facility grounds conditions,” the complainant was concerned that the areas along the sidewalks in the garden accessible to residents have holes with wires and water in them and has the potential for residents to stumble and get injured. To investigate, LPA toured the facility and interviewed the administrator. Continued on 9099-C. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 14, 2023 · control 29-AS-20230710114951

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 31 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
2
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
2
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
6
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
13
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
31
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →

Who runs Village At Sydney Creek, The?

From the CDSS ownership record, checked August 9, 2026.

Licensed to Village Pacific Management Group, Llc, The, who operates 2 licensed California homes in total. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(805) 543-2350
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Village At Sydney Creek, The? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.