Casa De Flores is a continuing-care retirement community in Morro Bay, San Luis Obispo County, California — state license #405800142, licensed for 120 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 12 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated March 16, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

1 home in view

Casa De Flores

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Continuing-care retirement community · Large community, 120 residents · Morro Bay, CA · San Luis Obispo County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceMemory care not on fileBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #405800142, held since 1997 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
1405 Teresa Drive · Morro Bay, San Luis Obispo County
Phone
(805) 772-7372
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
casadeflores.com
listed by the county Area Agency on Aging
Listing details can lag reality — confirm anything important by phone.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 120 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careVerified in record
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
ONE-HUNDRED TWENTY (120) ELDERLY RESIDENTS AGES 60 AND OVER. ALL MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER GRANTED FOR ELEVEN (11) RESIDENTS.State service designation938 - CONTINUE CARE CONTRACT (CCC)the CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 12 times and filed 12 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on March 16, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

Most recent state visit
March 16, 2026
Occupancy at the September 3, 2024 visit
77 of 120 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 3 documents with transcribed findings, dated May 24, 2022 to March 16, 2026. 3 of the 3 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 3 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 3 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 9 of 12 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20262 state visits · 2 documents
Mar 16, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff is verbally abusive towards other staff in the presence of residents

Licensing Program Anlayst (LPA) De Leon conducted a 10-day complaint visit to the facility above. LPA met with Administrator Jonathan Roberts and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA requested the following records: Staff Roster, Staff Schedule for March 2026 for Wellness Department, Wellness staff diciplinary records for 2025-2026, CNA certification and training for Wellness Staff 1 (S1), LPA conducted interviews with staff at 11:43pm, 12:03pm, 12:12pm, 12:50pm, 1:02pm, 1:20pm, 1:26pm, 2:00pm, and 2:45pm. On the allegation: Staff is verbally abusive towards other staff in the presence of residents. LPA reviewed records and conducted staff interviews which revealed that 9 out of 9 staff did not feel Staff 1 (S1) was verbally abusive to staff or to any staff in the presence of residents in care, the facility does hold staff meetings regualary and discussion on resident care is brought up to staffing but a staff is never singled out in those meetings in front of their peers. Continuedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 16, 2026 · control 29-AS-20260311091654
Feb 23, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20251 state visit · 1 document
Jan 23, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20243 state visits · 4 documents
Sep 3, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff interfered with a resident's medical decisions Staff mishandled a resident's medications while in care Facility Staff failed to provide requested records to designated representative Facility staff failed to provide current medical information to emergency responders

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Miller made a subsequent visit to facility on September 3, 2024, to deliver complaint findings. LPA met with Administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. LPAs Olson and Miller conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit to the facility above on January 30, 2024. LPA interviewed staff and residents and obtained relevant documentation. On the allegation: Staff interfered with a resident's medical decisions. It was alleged that Staff changed pharmacy of choice without resident’s (R1) consent. It was alleged that residents have a limited choice in home health services. LPAs Miller and Olson interviewed residents from 1:29 p.m. to 2:35 p.m. The majority of residents interviewed stated that they did not experience staff interference with medical decisions. One resident could not explain how staff was interfering with their medical decisions. None of the residents expressed any concerns about a limited choice in home health services. (Continued onthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 3, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240122095800
Sep 3, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 20, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 30, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20232 state visits · 2 documents
Dec 28, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 26, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations1typical 1
Type B citations0typical 1
Substantiated complaints1typical 2
Total complaints3typical 7
State visits on file12typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 1997.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20262202025110202434020233302022221
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — San Luis Obispo County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2022 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (805) 772-7372

Is Casa De Flores licensed?

Yes — Casa De Flores is a licensed continuing-care retirement community in Morro Bay (San Luis Obispo County): California license #405800142, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 120 residents. State records list 12 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated March 16, 2026, was marked “Unsubstantiated” by the state.

Can Casa De Flores care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Casa De Flores with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and hospice care; it does not list dementia / memory care and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordONE-HUNDRED TWENTY (120) ELDERLY RESIDENTS AGES 60 AND OVER. ALL MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER GRANTED FOR ELEVEN (11) RESIDENTS.

How much does Casa De Flores cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Casa De Flores's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Luis Obispo County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Casa De Flores accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Casa De Flores is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

77 of 120 beds occupied (64%) when the state visited on September 3, 2024. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Casa De Flores?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 12 state visits and 12 dated documents since 2022 for Casa De Flores; 3 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated March 16, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

3 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff is verbally abusive towards other staff in the presence of residents
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Anlayst (LPA) De Leon conducted a 10-day complaint visit to the facility above. LPA met with Administrator Jonathan Roberts and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA requested the following records: Staff Roster, Staff Schedule for March 2026 for Wellness Department, Wellness staff diciplinary records for 2025-2026, CNA certification and training for Wellness Staff 1 (S1), LPA conducted interviews with staff at 11:43pm, 12:03pm, 12:12pm, 12:50pm, 1:02pm, 1:20pm, 1:26pm, 2:00pm, and 2:45pm. On the allegation: Staff is verbally abusive towards other staff in the presence of residents. LPA reviewed records and conducted staff interviews which revealed that 9 out of 9 staff did not feel Staff 1 (S1) was verbally abusive to staff or to any staff in the presence of residents in care, the facility does hold staff meetings regualary and discussion on resident care is brought up to staffing but a staff is never singled out in those meetings in front of their peers. ContinuedCDSS inspection report, March 16, 2026 · control 29-AS-20260311091654

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff interfered with a resident's medical decisions Staff mishandled a resident's medications while in care Facility Staff failed to provide requested records to designated representative Facility staff failed to provide current medical information to emergency responders
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Miller made a subsequent visit to facility on September 3, 2024, to deliver complaint findings. LPA met with Administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. LPAs Olson and Miller conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit to the facility above on January 30, 2024. LPA interviewed staff and residents and obtained relevant documentation. On the allegation: Staff interfered with a resident's medical decisions. It was alleged that Staff changed pharmacy of choice without resident’s (R1) consent. It was alleged that residents have a limited choice in home health services. LPAs Miller and Olson interviewed residents from 1:29 p.m. to 2:35 p.m. The majority of residents interviewed stated that they did not experience staff interference with medical decisions. One resident could not explain how staff was interfering with their medical decisions. None of the residents expressed any concerns about a limited choice in home health services. (Continued onCDSS inspection report, September 3, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240122095800

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedRSO who is not a client allegedly resides, is present and/or has contact that may pose a risk to the health and safety of clients in care.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) De Leon conducted an unannounced complaint visit to issue final findings. Investigations Branch (IB) Investigator Munoz conducted this investigation on 5/23/2022. Based on evidence obtained during the course of this investigation, the Department has Substantiated that an individual who has been convicted of a crime for which registration as a Registered Sex Offender (RSO) is required, is residing at the facility or has presence/contact that may pose a risk to the health and safety of the client(s) in care at a facility licensed by the department. This is a factual determination based on all the facts and circumstances of the case. Exit interview, deficiency cited on 9099-D, civil penalty assessed, report and appeal rights emailed to Administrator. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 24, 2022 · control 29-AS-20220520170534

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 12 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
1
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
1
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
3
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
12
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(805) 772-7372
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Casa De Flores? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.