Brookdale Lodi is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Lodi, San Joaquin County, California — state license #397003771, licensed for 82 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 28 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated November 19, 2025 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

6 homes in view

Brookdale Lodi

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 82 residents · Lodi, CA · San Joaquin County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceMemory care not on fileBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #397003771, held since 2007 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
2220 W. Kettleman Lane · Lodi, San Joaquin County
Phone
(209) 367-8870
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 82 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careVerified in record
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND ABOVE. LICENSED TO SERVE 82 RESIDENTS. ALL MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR UP TO TEN (10) RESIDENTS.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 28 times and filed 28 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated November 19, 2025.

Most recent state visit
July 8, 2026
Occupancy at the October 1, 2025 visit
68 of 82 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 10 documents with transcribed findings, dated January 10, 2022 to October 1, 2025. 10 of the 10 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (9). 10 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 10 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 14 of 28 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20254 state visits · 6 documents
Nov 19, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 1, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident fell sustaining injuries due to staff neglect Staff handled resident in a rough manner resulting in injuries Staff are mismanaging residents medications Staff did not ensure residents received medical care Unqualified staff administered injections for residents Unqualified staff providing wound care for residents Staff did not prevent resident from engaging in inappropriate behaviors Staff left residents in soiled bed Staff did not safeguard residents personal belongings

Staff did not ensure residents rooms were clean Staff did not ensure the facility carpets were clean Staff are inappropriately operating the Hoyer Lift On 10/01/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kesha Lewis conducted an unannounced facility visit to continue the investagation for complaint for the above allegations. LPA met with Executive Director and explained the purpose of today's visit. LPA Lewis requested and reviewed training records records, medication policy, and medical records for R1 also LPA Lewis interviewed two (2) staff members and one (1) resident. LPA lewis toured the facility during the visit and conducted a medication count. see 9099C page Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 1, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250703090801
Oct 1, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 13, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are mismanaging residents medication Staff are not preventing resident from enagaging in inappropriate behaviors

On 05/13/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kesha Lewis arrived unannounced to deliver findings for the above allegations. LPA met with Executive Director Nicole Bacon and explained the purpose of today's visit. Based on record reviews and interviews, it is determined that there is not a preponderance of evidence to conclude that the staff mismanaged resident’s medication or that Staff are not preventing resident from engaging in inappropriate behaviors. Both the doctor’s directives and the client’s requests were followed as required. Staff had appropriate training in deescalating behaviors. Due to the above noted information, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, and therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided to the facility. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was given. Unsubthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 13, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250213113306
May 13, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 17, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20244 state visits · 4 documents
Dec 17, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 15, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 20, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 13, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20233 state visits · 4 documents
Dec 14, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff mismanage resident's medication

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Renee Campbell arrived at the facility unannounced on 12/14/23 at 11:30 AM to deliver complaint findings, LPA Renee Campbell met with Associate Executive Director and explained the purpose of the visit. Allegation #1: Staff mismanage resident’s medication. When interviewed, H1 stated that hospice had to ask the husband to step out so that staff could directly ask R1 if she wanted pain medication. Per H2, R1 asked for pain medication more “towards the end of her decline”. LPA Campbell observed that the Medication Administration Record (MAR) was completed correctly in regard to the doctor’s orders. S1 also explained how staff ensured R1 gave consent for pain management. Based on record reviews and interviews, it is determined that there is not a preponderance of evidence to conclude that the staff mismanaged resident’s medication. Both the doctor’s directives and the clients requests were followed as required. Due to the above noted information, although tthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 14, 2023 · control 27-AS-20230920111234
Nov 27, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: The Administrator is not available to attend to the management and administration of the facility.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kesha Lewis arrived unannounced to continue investigation and deliver findings for the allegations noted above. LPA met with Administrator Mary Margaret Chappell and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA also conducted interviews with Administrator and S1 during today's visit and reviewed the most recent staff roster and LIC 500. Allegation #1: The Administrator is not available to attend to the management and administration of the facility. Based on record reviews and interviews, it is determined that there is not a preponderance of evidence to conclude that The Administrator is not available to attend to the management and administration of the facility. As a result, this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Continued on 9099C... Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 27, 2023 · control 27-AS-20231030140239
Nov 27, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 9, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 1
Type B citations0typical 1
Substantiated complaints0typical 2
Total complaints11typical 7
State visits on file28typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2007.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202546020244402023560202291102021110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$3,500$5,500 /mo
our estimate — San Joaquin County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?
How are care plans reviewed when a resident’s needs change?

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (209) 367-8870

Is Brookdale Lodi licensed?

Yes — Brookdale Lodi is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Lodi (San Joaquin County): California license #397003771, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 82 residents. State records list 28 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated November 19, 2025, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Brookdale Lodi care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Brookdale Lodi with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and hospice care; it does not list dementia / memory care and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND ABOVE. LICENSED TO SERVE 82 RESIDENTS. ALL MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR UP TO TEN (10) RESIDENTS.

How much does Brookdale Lodi cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Brookdale Lodi's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Joaquin County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Brookdale Lodi accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Brookdale Lodi is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

68 of 82 beds occupied (83%) when the state visited on October 1, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Brookdale Lodi?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 28 state visits and 28 dated documents since 2021 for Brookdale Lodi; 10 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated October 1, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

10 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident fell sustaining injuries due to staff neglect Staff handled resident in a rough manner resulting in injuries Staff are mismanaging residents medications Staff did not ensure residents received medical care Unqualified staff administered injections for residents Unqualified staff providing wound care for residents Staff did not prevent resident from engaging in inappropriate behaviors Staff left residents in soiled bed Staff did not safeguard residents personal belongings
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Staff did not ensure residents rooms were clean Staff did not ensure the facility carpets were clean Staff are inappropriately operating the Hoyer Lift On 10/01/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kesha Lewis conducted an unannounced facility visit to continue the investagation for complaint for the above allegations. LPA met with Executive Director and explained the purpose of today's visit. LPA Lewis requested and reviewed training records records, medication policy, and medical records for R1 also LPA Lewis interviewed two (2) staff members and one (1) resident. LPA lewis toured the facility during the visit and conducted a medication count. see 9099C page UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 1, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250703090801
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are mismanaging residents medication Staff are not preventing resident from enagaging in inappropriate behaviors
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 05/13/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kesha Lewis arrived unannounced to deliver findings for the above allegations. LPA met with Executive Director Nicole Bacon and explained the purpose of today's visit. Based on record reviews and interviews, it is determined that there is not a preponderance of evidence to conclude that the staff mismanaged resident’s medication or that Staff are not preventing resident from engaging in inappropriate behaviors. Both the doctor’s directives and the client’s requests were followed as required. Staff had appropriate training in deescalating behaviors. Due to the above noted information, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, and therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided to the facility. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was given. UnsubCDSS inspection report, May 13, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250213113306

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff mismanage resident's medication
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Renee Campbell arrived at the facility unannounced on 12/14/23 at 11:30 AM to deliver complaint findings, LPA Renee Campbell met with Associate Executive Director and explained the purpose of the visit. Allegation #1: Staff mismanage resident’s medication. When interviewed, H1 stated that hospice had to ask the husband to step out so that staff could directly ask R1 if she wanted pain medication. Per H2, R1 asked for pain medication more “towards the end of her decline”. LPA Campbell observed that the Medication Administration Record (MAR) was completed correctly in regard to the doctor’s orders. S1 also explained how staff ensured R1 gave consent for pain management. Based on record reviews and interviews, it is determined that there is not a preponderance of evidence to conclude that the staff mismanaged resident’s medication. Both the doctor’s directives and the clients requests were followed as required. Due to the above noted information, although tCDSS inspection report, December 14, 2023 · control 27-AS-20230920111234
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedThe Administrator is not available to attend to the management and administration of the facility.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kesha Lewis arrived unannounced to continue investigation and deliver findings for the allegations noted above. LPA met with Administrator Mary Margaret Chappell and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA also conducted interviews with Administrator and S1 during today's visit and reviewed the most recent staff roster and LIC 500. Allegation #1: The Administrator is not available to attend to the management and administration of the facility. Based on record reviews and interviews, it is determined that there is not a preponderance of evidence to conclude that The Administrator is not available to attend to the management and administration of the facility. As a result, this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Continued on 9099C... UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, November 27, 2023 · control 27-AS-20231030140239

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedSufficient food service personnel shall be employed, trained and their working hours scheduled to meet the needs of residents.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ruth Wallace conducted unannounced initial ten (10) day complaint investigation visit. LPA explained purpose of visit and discussed with Administrator (AD). The initial 10-Day visit was conducted on today's date of 12/6/2022. LPA Wallace reviewed facility training records of kitchen and dining room staff. LPA reviewed staff working schedule at facility for approximately the last several months of 2022. LPA Wallace interviewed administrator, kitchen staff, and resident regarding the above allegation. It was alleged that there was not sufficient food service personnel, training, or working hours scheduled to meet the needs of residents. LPA reviewed all staff schedules, training, and new employees hired after approximately seven staff left employment within a month's time period. Continued on 9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 6, 2022 · control 27-AS-20221128155453
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is not following COVID-19 guidelines.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On 10-21-22 at 3:30pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Bilger arrived unannounced to open and investigate the complaint allegation listed above. Allegation states a staff member worked at facility on 10-11-22 while having symptoms of COVID-19. LPA conducted interviews with staff1 (S1) and reviewed COVID-19 line list. LPA also conducted facility tour. Based on interviews and record reviews it was determined that S2 tested positive for COVID-19 on 10/10/22 and S3 tested positive for COVID-19 on 10/7/22. Interviews and record reviews revealed S3 arrived at facility on 10-10-22, tested positive for COVID-19 and was sent home without working at facility. It was further determined that neither S2 or S3 worked on 10-11-22. Additionally, facility has not reported through weekly response testing any additional COVID-19 symptoms or positive results among staff since 10-10-22. A review of staffing records revealed S3 did not work on 10-11-22, and S2 was cleared to work by this date. FacilCDSS inspection report, October 21, 2022 · control 27-AS-20221013090747
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained falls while in care Staff did not administer resident's medication as prescribed
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 10-21-22 at 1:15pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Bilger arrived unannounced to continue investigation and deliver findings for the allegations noted above. LPA met with Administrator Mary Margaret Chappell and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA also conducted interviews with Administrator and Staff1 (S1) during today's visit and reviewed needs and service plan for Resident1 (R1), staffing records, medication records, emergency pendant response log, and facility staff training records. Allegation #1: Resident sustained falls while in care. LPA conducted staff and resident interviews, and facility file documentation as stated above. Based on record reviews and interviews it was determined that R1 had multiple episodes of attempting to transfer with no evidence of falls as a result. Additionally, based on interviews and record reviews, it was determined that there have been no reported episodes of falls. A review of staffing records reveal staff is present consistentlyCDSS inspection report, October 21, 2022 · control 27-AS-20220803130753
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff billed resident in excess of the agreed upon rates provided in the Admission Agreement.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 08/17/2022 at 9:45am, LPA R. Campbell and Michael Bilger arrived unannounced to facility to continue the complaint investigation for the allegation noted above. During this investigation, LPA Campbell interviewed Administrator and complainant, and reviewed admission agreement and billing statements for resident1 (R1). Based on interviews and record reviews, it was determined that there was no intention to overbill. It was found that there was a misunderstanding of the facility's billing process and funds were returned. There is no evidence of an actual physical bill received. Funds have been returned as requested. As a result, this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted with Mary Margaret Chappell and copy of this report was provided to Mary. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 17, 2022 · control 27-AS-20220630115330
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff assaulted resident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 6-22-22 at 2:20pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Bilger arrived unannounced to deliver complaint findings for the allegation listed above. LPA met with Administrator Mary Margaret Chappell and explained the purpose of the visit. During this investigation, On 6-8-22, LPA interviewed staff1 (S1), S2, and S3. LPA also interviewed Resident2 (R2), R3, and R4. On 6-8-22, LPA also interviewed Administrator on duty at time of alleged incident. Additionally, LPA reviewed facility file documentation including pre-admission appraisal for R1, physician’s report for R1, physician communication note for R1, staffing schedule, and police report dated 4-27-22. Based on interviews and record reviews conducted, it was determined that Resident1 (R1) stated an allegation of being slapped in the face and punched in the back on 4-27-22 by a caregiver. Interviews conducted and records reviewed revealed no witnesses to said allegation or outstanding visible injuries noted. A police report dated 4CDSS inspection report, June 22, 2022 · control 27-AS-20220428133810
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident was injured while in care. Staff did not respond to resident's calls for assistance. Facility staff did not ensure that diabetic resident was fed timely.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 01/10/2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) T. White conducted an unannounced complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA White discussed the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegations with Executive Director, Mary Margaret Chappell. During the course of investigation, LPA White interviewed 4 staff members and 4 residents. LPA collected the following documents for Resident #1 (R1): Physician Report (LIC602), Identification and Emergency Information, Needs and Service Plan, Progress Notes, Room Service Slips and Pendant tracker within the last 30 days. Report Continues at 9099C. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 10, 2022 · control 27-AS-20211214154259

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 28 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing. No substantiated complaints are on file.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
0
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
11
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
28
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(209) 367-8870
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Brookdale Lodi? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.