Mona Liza is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Stockton, San Joaquin County, California — state license #392700225, with a licensed capacity of 6, listed as closed, agency initiated in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 16 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated June 22, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

6 homes in view

Mona Liza

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 6 residents · Stockton, CA · San Joaquin County
Closed in state recordWheelchair not on fileMemory care not on fileHospice not on fileBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #392700225, held since 2018 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
1552 Middle Field Ave · Stockton, San Joaquin County
Phone
(209) 910-9904
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryNot on file — ask the home
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careNot on file — ask the home
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 AMBULATORY.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 18 times and filed 16 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on June 22, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Substantiated.”

Most recent state visit
June 22, 2026
Occupancy at that visit
0 of 6 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 4 documents with transcribed findings, dated November 17, 2022 to June 22, 2026. 4 of the 4 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (4). 4 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 4 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 11 of 16 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20262 state visits · 2 documents
Jun 22, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Loss of control of property

On 06/22/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arielle Pascua arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA Pascua was greeted by Tenant, Rachelle Bradshaw. LPA Pascua identified herself as a representative from Community Care Licensing, explaining that this property was a licensed facility. It was determined at this time that the tenant has resided at the property since June 9, 2026. LPA Pascua attempted to contact the property owner, however, the phone number on file was out of service, and contact could not be established.LPA Pascua toured the property to verify that there were no residents currently receiving care at the location. Additionally, a copy of the rental agreement was reviewed and obtained.Based on the information gathered during the investigation, the facility licensee has lost control of the property. As a result of this investigation, this LPA found the allegations to be SUBSTANTIATED - A finding that the complaint was Substantiated meant thatthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 22, 2026 · control 27-AS-20260619142753
Mar 27, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20254 state visits · 5 documents
Dec 23, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 24, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff left residents unsupervised

On 11/24/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Albert Johnson arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint investigation. Based on a facility visit conducted by Ombudsman officials on November 20, 2025, at approximately 12:10 p.m., the facility was found to be without staff present. Ombudsman officials checked the premises and confirmed with R1 that S1 had left to go to the store. The facility was secured by the two Ombudsman officials during their visit. The Department was contacted regarding the situation, and law enforcement was notified; however, law enforcement was redirected to an emergency before a report could be made and subsequently left the scene. S1 returned to the facility at 1:02 p.m. and explained they needed to obtain important items. Substantiated Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 24, 2025 · control 27-AS-20251120130750
Nov 24, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 26, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 13, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20244 state visits · 4 documents
Jun 5, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 6, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 18, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not assist resident with scheduling medical appointments

On 3/18/2024, LPA Johnson made an unannounced visit to deliver findings for the above allegations. LPA met with Vicky Santillan Allegation: Staff did not assist resident with scheduling medical appointments. Based on records reviewed the facility did not make appointments for R2 to get an updated physician's report. The department also interviewed R1 and confirmed that the facility has not schedule or assisted to schedule an appointment to have R1's see the optometrist. Continued. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 18, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240205150133
Mar 4, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations2typical 0
Type B citations2typical 0
Substantiated complaints4typical 0
Total complaints4typical 0
State visits on file18typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2018.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202622120254512024441202311020222312021110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$3,500$5,500 /mo
our estimate — San Joaquin County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

If end-of-life care were ever needed, could they stay here? What’s the plan?
Ask how the 2026 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (209) 910-9904

Is Mona Liza licensed?

No — not currently. The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists Mona Liza in Stockton (San Joaquin County), California license #392700225, as “Closed, Agency Initiated, formerly licensed for 6 residents. State records list 16 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated June 22, 2026, was marked “Substantiated” by the state.

Can Mona Liza care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists no specialized-care clearances for Mona Liza (wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden are not on file). A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 AMBULATORY.

How much does Mona Liza cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Mona Liza's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Joaquin County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Mona Liza accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Mona Liza is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

0 of 6 beds occupied (0%) when the state visited on June 22, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Mona Liza?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 18 state visits and 16 dated documents since 2021 for Mona Liza; 4 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated June 22, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

4 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLoss of control of property
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 06/22/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arielle Pascua arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA Pascua was greeted by Tenant, Rachelle Bradshaw. LPA Pascua identified herself as a representative from Community Care Licensing, explaining that this property was a licensed facility. It was determined at this time that the tenant has resided at the property since June 9, 2026. LPA Pascua attempted to contact the property owner, however, the phone number on file was out of service, and contact could not be established.LPA Pascua toured the property to verify that there were no residents currently receiving care at the location. Additionally, a copy of the rental agreement was reviewed and obtained.Based on the information gathered during the investigation, the facility licensee has lost control of the property. As a result of this investigation, this LPA found the allegations to be SUBSTANTIATED - A finding that the complaint was Substantiated meant thatCDSS inspection report, June 22, 2026 · control 27-AS-20260619142753

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff left residents unsupervised
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 11/24/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Albert Johnson arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint investigation. Based on a facility visit conducted by Ombudsman officials on November 20, 2025, at approximately 12:10 p.m., the facility was found to be without staff present. Ombudsman officials checked the premises and confirmed with R1 that S1 had left to go to the store. The facility was secured by the two Ombudsman officials during their visit. The Department was contacted regarding the situation, and law enforcement was notified; however, law enforcement was redirected to an emergency before a report could be made and subsequently left the scene. S1 returned to the facility at 1:02 p.m. and explained they needed to obtain important items. Substantiated SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, November 24, 2025 · control 27-AS-20251120130750

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not assist resident with scheduling medical appointments
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 3/18/2024, LPA Johnson made an unannounced visit to deliver findings for the above allegations. LPA met with Vicky Santillan Allegation: Staff did not assist resident with scheduling medical appointments. Based on records reviewed the facility did not make appointments for R2 to get an updated physician's report. The department also interviewed R1 and confirmed that the facility has not schedule or assisted to schedule an appointment to have R1's see the optometrist. Continued. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 18, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240205150133

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 18 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
2
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
2
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
4
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
4
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
18
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(209) 910-9904
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Mona Liza? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.