Lilos Tender Senior Care Inc is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in La Mesa, San Diego County, California — state license #374604780, with a licensed capacity of 6, listed as closed, change of location in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 5 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2024, the most recent dated February 12, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

300 homes in view

Lilos Tender Senior Care Inc

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 6 residents · La Mesa, CA · San Diego County
Closed in state recordWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #374604780, held since 2024 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
9414 Grossmont Blvd · La Mesa, San Diego County
Phone
(818) 284-2502
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 6 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 6 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 1 resident

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR SIX(6) NON-AMBULATORY RESIDENTS OF WHICH ONE(1) CAN BE BEDRIDDEN IN ROOM #1. WAIVER/GRANTED FOR HOSPICE CARE FOR SIX(6) RESIDENTS.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2024, the state has visited this home 6 times and filed 5 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on February 12, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

Most recent state visit
February 12, 2026
Occupancy at that visit
6 of 6 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 3 documents with transcribed findings, dated September 19, 2024 to February 12, 2026. 3 of the 3 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 3 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 3 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 5 of 5 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20261 state visit · 1 document
Feb 12, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Lack of supervision resulting in resident being touched inappropriately

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Domingo conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegations. LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Executive Director, Wes Hebner. On 7/1/25, it was alleged that lack of supervision resulted in a resident being touched inappropriately. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, interviews with facility staff, residents, outside sources, and records review. During the visit, the LPA observed staff coverage in common areas and residential corridors. Staff were present and engaged with residents, providing assistance and maintaining line-of-sight supervision consistent with Title 22 requirements. No unsafe supervision gaps or high-risk situations were observed. The environment appeared calm and organized, and staff demonstrated awareness of resident boundaries and safety. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 12, 2026 · control 08-AS-20250701114347
20252 state visits · 2 documents
Sep 5, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff gave resident medication without a physicians order

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ramin Hashemi conducted an unannounced visit to initiate a complaint investigation regarding the above-mentioned allegation and deliver the finding. LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Caregiver Paola Castillo. It was alleged Staff gave resident medication without a physician's order. CCLD’s investigation involved an unannounced facility visit, review of facility records, interviews with facility staff, residents, outside sources, and LPA direct observations. Regarding the allegation, staff interviews revealed that as a policy, the facility staff do not administer injections. Staff 1 (S1) stated Resident 1 (R1) does not do their own injections. When asked about R1's medication management, S1 stated R1 cannot manage their own medications and they travel to an outside medication management agency for insulin injections. (continued on Page 2, LIC9099C) Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 5, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250829135252
Apr 11, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20242 state visits · 2 documents
Sep 19, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff were administering injections to resident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Amy Rodgers, conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to gather additional records and deliver findings. The LPA introduced herself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Care Giver Wendy Gomez Estrada and a spoke on the phone with Licensee Annie Nazaian. It was reported to Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) on August 16, 20204 staff were administrating medication injections to a resident. The licensees and their designated facility staff are limited to “assistance with self-administration” and are prohibited from “administering” medications, unless done so by an appropriately skilled professional acting within their scope of practice. Records reviews indicate that staff members were not authorized to administered medication injections and did not have proper medical authorization or training to administer medication injections. (continued on 9099-c) Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 19, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240816153126
Apr 18, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations1typical 0
Type B citations0typical 0
Substantiated complaints1typical 0
Total complaints3typical 0
State visits on file6typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2024.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202611020252202024221
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — San Diego County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (818) 284-2502

Is Lilos Tender Senior Care Inc licensed?

No — not currently. The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists Lilos Tender Senior Care Inc in La Mesa (San Diego County), California license #374604780, as “Closed, Change Of Location, formerly licensed for 6 residents. State records list 5 inspection and complaint documents since 2024; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated February 12, 2026, was marked “Unsubstantiated” by the state.

Can Lilos Tender Senior Care Inc care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Lilos Tender Senior Care Inc with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR SIX(6) NON-AMBULATORY RESIDENTS OF WHICH ONE(1) CAN BE BEDRIDDEN IN ROOM #1. WAIVER/GRANTED FOR HOSPICE CARE FOR SIX(6) RESIDENTS.

How much does Lilos Tender Senior Care Inc cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Lilos Tender Senior Care Inc's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Diego County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Lilos Tender Senior Care Inc accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Lilos Tender Senior Care Inc is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

6 of 6 beds occupied (100%) when the state visited on February 12, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Lilos Tender Senior Care Inc?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 6 state visits and 5 dated documents since 2024 for Lilos Tender Senior Care Inc; 3 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated February 12, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

3 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLack of supervision resulting in resident being touched inappropriately
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Domingo conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegations. LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Executive Director, Wes Hebner. On 7/1/25, it was alleged that lack of supervision resulted in a resident being touched inappropriately. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, interviews with facility staff, residents, outside sources, and records review. During the visit, the LPA observed staff coverage in common areas and residential corridors. Staff were present and engaged with residents, providing assistance and maintaining line-of-sight supervision consistent with Title 22 requirements. No unsafe supervision gaps or high-risk situations were observed. The environment appeared calm and organized, and staff demonstrated awareness of resident boundaries and safety. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 12, 2026 · control 08-AS-20250701114347

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff gave resident medication without a physicians order
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ramin Hashemi conducted an unannounced visit to initiate a complaint investigation regarding the above-mentioned allegation and deliver the finding. LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Caregiver Paola Castillo. It was alleged Staff gave resident medication without a physician's order. CCLD’s investigation involved an unannounced facility visit, review of facility records, interviews with facility staff, residents, outside sources, and LPA direct observations. Regarding the allegation, staff interviews revealed that as a policy, the facility staff do not administer injections. Staff 1 (S1) stated Resident 1 (R1) does not do their own injections. When asked about R1's medication management, S1 stated R1 cannot manage their own medications and they travel to an outside medication management agency for insulin injections. (continued on Page 2, LIC9099C) UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, September 5, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250829135252

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff were administering injections to resident
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Amy Rodgers, conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to gather additional records and deliver findings. The LPA introduced herself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Care Giver Wendy Gomez Estrada and a spoke on the phone with Licensee Annie Nazaian. It was reported to Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) on August 16, 20204 staff were administrating medication injections to a resident. The licensees and their designated facility staff are limited to “assistance with self-administration” and are prohibited from “administering” medications, unless done so by an appropriately skilled professional acting within their scope of practice. Records reviews indicate that staff members were not authorized to administered medication injections and did not have proper medical authorization or training to administer medication injections. (continued on 9099-c) SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 19, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240816153126

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 6 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
1
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
0
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
1
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
3
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
6
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →

Who runs Lilos Tender Senior Care Inc?

From the CDSS ownership record, checked August 9, 2026.

Licensed to Lilos Tender Senior Care Inc, who operates 3 licensed California homes in total. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(818) 284-2502
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Lilos Tender Senior Care Inc? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.