Acorn Oaks Manor Ii is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in San Diego, San Diego County, California — state license #374604552, licensed for 14 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 15 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated June 2, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

9 homes in view

Acorn Oaks Manor Ii

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Mid-size home, 14 residents · San Diego, CA · San Diego County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceBedriddenMemory care not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #374604552, held since 2022 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
6217 Acorn St · San Diego, San Diego County
Phone
(619) 777-9674
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 14 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 6 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 6 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 14 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 6 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. BEDRIDDEN IN BEDROOMS 2, 4 AND 8. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 6.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 18 times and filed 15 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated June 2, 2026.

Most recent state visit
June 2, 2026
Occupancy at the January 28, 2026 visit
12 of 14 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 8 documents with transcribed findings, dated September 28, 2023 to January 28, 2026. 8 of the 8 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (3), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (4). 8 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 8 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 14 of 15 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20262 state visits · 3 documents
Jun 2, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 28, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: -Licensee did not meet resident(s)’ personal care needs. -Licensee did not maintain toilet paper in bathroom.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Dang Nguyen conducted an unannounced subsequent visit to deliver findings regarding the above prior complaint allegations. LPA was welcomed by, identified himself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Supervisor Jamily “Jamila” Hallak and Licensee/Administrator Alex Limpin. The Complainant alleged that Licensee did not meet Resident(s)’ personal care needs and that Licensee did not maintain toilet paper in bathroom. CCLD’s investigation involved multiple unannounced facility tours/welfare checks and interviews of all residents in care, outside sources, and multiple facility managers and caregivers. The Department also reviewed pertinent care records. [CONTINUED ON LIC 9099-C, 1 of 2] Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 28, 2026 · control 08-AS-20260107115647
Jan 28, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20255 state visits · 7 documents
Jul 16, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure that resident is able to make and receive confidential phone calls.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Amy Rodgers, conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings regarding the above-mentioned allegations. The LPA was greeted by Community Manager Jamila Hallak , who identified herself and disclosed the purpose of the visit. The Department’s investigation consisted of a review of records and interviews with internal and external sources. On May 1, 2025, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging that licensee staff do not ensure that residents can make and receive confidential phone calls. More specifically, the licensee staff told the reporting party they could not speak with Resident #1(R1) or visit R1 without R1's power of attorney permission. (Continued on LIC9099C) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 16, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250501084930
Jul 1, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not maintain facility in compliance with its issued fire clearance.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Dang Nguyen conducted an unannounced visit to commence a Complaint Investigation regarding the above allegation. LPA was welcomed by, identified himself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Supervisor Jamily “Jamila” Hallak. LPA then met with Administrator/Licensee Alexander “Alex” Limpin, who arrived shortly after. The Complainant alleged that Licensee did not maintain facility in compliance with its issued fire clearance. CCLD’s investigation involved an unannounced facility tour/welfare check, interviews of relevant staff and a deputy fire marshal, and review of pertinent physical plant records and correspondence. [CONTINUED ON LIC 9099-C] Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 1, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250625100036
May 7, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Unlawful Eviction Staff neglect resulting in Injury

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Rodgers conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for a complaint investigation for the above-mentioned allegation. LPA identified herself, disclosed the purpose of the visit and was allowed entry by community manager Jamila Hallak. LIcensee/Administrator Alex Limpin later joined the visit. The Department’s investigation consisted of a records review, interviews and LPA observations. On 08/30/2023 it was alleged that Client #1 (C1) received an unlawful eviction and staff neglect resulted in the injury of C1. LPA Rodgers made observations, conducted interviews and reviewed facility records. [See LIC811 Confidential Name List for identification of select person identifiers used in this report]. Regarding the alligation of C1's unlawful eviction. More specifically, C1 was admitted to the hospital on 8/22/2023 and was ready to be released on 08/28/2023, but the facility refused to accept the client back due to medication non-compliance. (continuthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 7, 2025 · control 08-AS-20230830072340
May 7, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not administer medication as prescribed

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Rodgers made an unannounced visit to open an investigation on the above-mentioned allegation. LPA identified herself and disclosed the purpose of her visit with Licensee/Administrator Alex Limpin. On March 24th, 2025 , Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging that the Staff did not administer as-needed prescription medication (PRN) Oxycodone, as often as they should a couple of weeks ago. Records reveal Resident #1(R1) was a resident at the facility from 3/31/2023 to 4/28/2023. No records could be found for R1 in the timeframe the complainant states. Interviews with staff confirm they only give PRN per the physician's orders. Interview with R1's hospice care provider nurse recalls R1 and states they visited R1 at least every other day, if not every day, to ensure PRN's and prescribed medications were being given. The hospice nurse confirmed they did not have concerns and R1 was given all PRN and prescribed medication appropriatelythe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 7, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250324131918
May 7, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 11, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 5, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not provide safe and healthful living accommodations Facility in disrepair

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted a complaint investigation regarding the above mentioned allegations. LPA met with Community Manager, Jamila Hallak. Administrator, Alex Limpin arrived during the visit. During the investigation, the facility was toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff, residents, and outside sources. It was alleged the licensee did not provide safe and healthful living accommodations for residents due to a rat/rodent infestation. Outside source photo evidence was provided for room #8 that showed rat droppings in resident’s room, in the dresser drawer, on the resident’s clothing, behind the dresser, and a resident’s shoe that had bite marks with a piece torn off. The administrator explained observing a rodent on the outside of the facility back in January 2025. Therefore, they contacted a pest control company. Continued on an LIC 9099C. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 5, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250226105852
20242 state visits · 2 documents
May 15, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 26, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20232 state visits · 2 documents
Nov 29, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not provide refund as required.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Domingo conducted an unannounced visit to deliver the finding in the above mention complaint allegation. LPA Domingo identified herself and discussed the purpose of the visit with House Manager Jamila Hallak. During the investigation, LPA Domingo collected pertinent resident records as well as facility documentation and conducted interviews with staff, residents and outside sources. It was alleged that Resident 1 (R1) (See LIC811 Confidential Names list), did not receive a refund as required. LPA Domingo conducted an interview with outside source 1 (OS1) and OS1 verified that the refund was received and the facility did provide a refund as required. Staff 1 (S1) was interviewed and S1 also provided documentation that the facility did provide a refund as required. [Continue on LIC9099C] Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 29, 2023 · control 08-AS-20231031094440
Sep 28, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: -Personal Rights -Personal Rights -Staff did not provide timely assistance to resident in care -Licensee did not follow reporting requirements

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit to commence a complaint investigation. LPA identified herself and discussed the allegations mentioned above with Staff, Jamila Hallak. During today's visit, LPA briefly toured the facility, interviewed staff, and requested records. Mulitple allegations were reported, as listed above. Evidence obtained during the investigation indicated the allegations were pertaining to a specfiic resident. Staff interviews revealed that specific resident resided at a different location. Based on interviews, we have found that the complaint was unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report along with Licensee Rights (LIC 9058 01/16) were provided to Staff, Jamila Hallak whose signature below confirms receipt of these rights. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 28, 2023 · control 08-AS-20230927093131
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations1typical 0
Type B citations4typical 0
Substantiated complaints5typical 0
Total complaints8typical 1
State visits on file18typical 8
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 307 licensed mid-size homes (7–15 beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2022.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20262312025572202422020232202022110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — San Diego County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2026 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (619) 777-9674

Is Acorn Oaks Manor Ii licensed?

Yes — Acorn Oaks Manor Ii is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in San Diego (San Diego County): California license #374604552, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 14 residents. State records list 15 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated June 2, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Acorn Oaks Manor Ii care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Acorn Oaks Manor Ii with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 14 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 6 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. BEDRIDDEN IN BEDROOMS 2, 4 AND 8. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 6.

How much does Acorn Oaks Manor Ii cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Acorn Oaks Manor Ii's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Diego County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Acorn Oaks Manor Ii accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Acorn Oaks Manor Ii is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

12 of 14 beds occupied (86%) when the state visited on January 28, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Acorn Oaks Manor Ii?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 18 state visits and 15 dated documents since 2022 for Acorn Oaks Manor Ii; 8 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated January 28, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

8 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewed-Licensee did not meet resident(s)’ personal care needs. -Licensee did not maintain toilet paper in bathroom.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Dang Nguyen conducted an unannounced subsequent visit to deliver findings regarding the above prior complaint allegations. LPA was welcomed by, identified himself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Supervisor Jamily “Jamila” Hallak and Licensee/Administrator Alex Limpin. The Complainant alleged that Licensee did not meet Resident(s)’ personal care needs and that Licensee did not maintain toilet paper in bathroom. CCLD’s investigation involved multiple unannounced facility tours/welfare checks and interviews of all residents in care, outside sources, and multiple facility managers and caregivers. The Department also reviewed pertinent care records. [CONTINUED ON LIC 9099-C, 1 of 2] SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 28, 2026 · control 08-AS-20260107115647

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not ensure that resident is able to make and receive confidential phone calls.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Amy Rodgers, conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings regarding the above-mentioned allegations. The LPA was greeted by Community Manager Jamila Hallak , who identified herself and disclosed the purpose of the visit. The Department’s investigation consisted of a review of records and interviews with internal and external sources. On May 1, 2025, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging that licensee staff do not ensure that residents can make and receive confidential phone calls. More specifically, the licensee staff told the reporting party they could not speak with Resident #1(R1) or visit R1 without R1's power of attorney permission. (Continued on LIC9099C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 16, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250501084930
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee did not maintain facility in compliance with its issued fire clearance.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Dang Nguyen conducted an unannounced visit to commence a Complaint Investigation regarding the above allegation. LPA was welcomed by, identified himself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Supervisor Jamily “Jamila” Hallak. LPA then met with Administrator/Licensee Alexander “Alex” Limpin, who arrived shortly after. The Complainant alleged that Licensee did not maintain facility in compliance with its issued fire clearance. CCLD’s investigation involved an unannounced facility tour/welfare check, interviews of relevant staff and a deputy fire marshal, and review of pertinent physical plant records and correspondence. [CONTINUED ON LIC 9099-C] SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 1, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250625100036
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedUnlawful Eviction Staff neglect resulting in Injury
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Rodgers conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for a complaint investigation for the above-mentioned allegation. LPA identified herself, disclosed the purpose of the visit and was allowed entry by community manager Jamila Hallak. LIcensee/Administrator Alex Limpin later joined the visit. The Department’s investigation consisted of a records review, interviews and LPA observations. On 08/30/2023 it was alleged that Client #1 (C1) received an unlawful eviction and staff neglect resulted in the injury of C1. LPA Rodgers made observations, conducted interviews and reviewed facility records. [See LIC811 Confidential Name List for identification of select person identifiers used in this report]. Regarding the alligation of C1's unlawful eviction. More specifically, C1 was admitted to the hospital on 8/22/2023 and was ready to be released on 08/28/2023, but the facility refused to accept the client back due to medication non-compliance. (continuCDSS inspection report, May 7, 2025 · control 08-AS-20230830072340
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not administer medication as prescribed
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Rodgers made an unannounced visit to open an investigation on the above-mentioned allegation. LPA identified herself and disclosed the purpose of her visit with Licensee/Administrator Alex Limpin. On March 24th, 2025 , Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging that the Staff did not administer as-needed prescription medication (PRN) Oxycodone, as often as they should a couple of weeks ago. Records reveal Resident #1(R1) was a resident at the facility from 3/31/2023 to 4/28/2023. No records could be found for R1 in the timeframe the complainant states. Interviews with staff confirm they only give PRN per the physician's orders. Interview with R1's hospice care provider nurse recalls R1 and states they visited R1 at least every other day, if not every day, to ensure PRN's and prescribed medications were being given. The hospice nurse confirmed they did not have concerns and R1 was given all PRN and prescribed medication appropriatelyCDSS inspection report, May 7, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250324131918
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee did not provide safe and healthful living accommodations Facility in disrepair
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted a complaint investigation regarding the above mentioned allegations. LPA met with Community Manager, Jamila Hallak. Administrator, Alex Limpin arrived during the visit. During the investigation, the facility was toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff, residents, and outside sources. It was alleged the licensee did not provide safe and healthful living accommodations for residents due to a rat/rodent infestation. Outside source photo evidence was provided for room #8 that showed rat droppings in resident’s room, in the dresser drawer, on the resident’s clothing, behind the dresser, and a resident’s shoe that had bite marks with a piece torn off. The administrator explained observing a rodent on the outside of the facility back in January 2025. Therefore, they contacted a pest control company. Continued on an LIC 9099C. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 5, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250226105852

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee did not provide refund as required.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Domingo conducted an unannounced visit to deliver the finding in the above mention complaint allegation. LPA Domingo identified herself and discussed the purpose of the visit with House Manager Jamila Hallak. During the investigation, LPA Domingo collected pertinent resident records as well as facility documentation and conducted interviews with staff, residents and outside sources. It was alleged that Resident 1 (R1) (See LIC811 Confidential Names list), did not receive a refund as required. LPA Domingo conducted an interview with outside source 1 (OS1) and OS1 verified that the refund was received and the facility did provide a refund as required. Staff 1 (S1) was interviewed and S1 also provided documentation that the facility did provide a refund as required. [Continue on LIC9099C] UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, November 29, 2023 · control 08-AS-20231031094440
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewed-Personal Rights -Personal Rights -Staff did not provide timely assistance to resident in care -Licensee did not follow reporting requirements
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit to commence a complaint investigation. LPA identified herself and discussed the allegations mentioned above with Staff, Jamila Hallak. During today's visit, LPA briefly toured the facility, interviewed staff, and requested records. Mulitple allegations were reported, as listed above. Evidence obtained during the investigation indicated the allegations were pertaining to a specfiic resident. Staff interviews revealed that specific resident resided at a different location. Based on interviews, we have found that the complaint was unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report along with Licensee Rights (LIC 9058 01/16) were provided to Staff, Jamila Hallak whose signature below confirms receipt of these rights. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, September 28, 2023 · control 08-AS-20230927093131

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 18 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for mid-size homes (7–15 beds), computed across all 307 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
1
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
4
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
5
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
8
typical for this size: 1
State visits on file
18
typical for this size: 8
See the full inspection record on the state's site →

Who runs Acorn Oaks Manor Ii?

From the CDSS ownership record, checked August 9, 2026.

Licensed to Acorn Manor Llc, who operates 3 licensed California homes in total. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(619) 777-9674
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Acorn Oaks Manor Ii? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.