Gardens At Escondido is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Escondido, San Diego County, California — state license #374604545, licensed for 101 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 22 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated February 6, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

12 homes in view

Gardens At Escondido

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 101 residents · Escondido, CA · San Diego County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #374604545, held since 2023 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
1342 North Escondido Blvd · Escondido, San Diego County
Phone
(760) 480-8155
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryVerified in record
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careVerified in record
Bedridden careApproved for 10 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
THE FACILITY SERVES ELDERLY RESIDENTS; AGES 60 AND ABOVE; ALL OF WHOM MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY; 10 OF WHICH MAY BE BEDRIDDEN; HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 18 RESIDENTS; APPROVED FOR DELAYED EGRESS. NEW MGMT. CO. (ESCONDIDO EL NORTE MGR. LLC.) EFFECTIVE 2/18/25.State service designations983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA · 985 - RCFE / HOSPICEthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 25 times and filed 22 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated February 6, 2026.

Most recent state visit
July 15, 2026
Occupancy at the September 22, 2025 visit
74 of 101 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 12 documents with transcribed findings, dated April 11, 2024 to September 22, 2025. 12 of the 12 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (4), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (7). 12 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 12 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 20 of 22 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20261 state visit · 1 document
Feb 6, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

202511 state visits · 15 documents
Sep 22, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Due to staff neglect, resident sustained a burn requiring hospitalization.

On 09/22/25 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javina George made an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings for the allegation noted above. LPA met with Monica Flores, Executive Director and explained the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegation. The allegation was investigated, and the investigation consisted of observations, interviews and records review. On 07/13/2023 Community Care Licensing received a complaint alleging due to staff neglect, resident sustained a burn requiring hospitalization. Resident #1 (R1) was admitted to the facility on 06/15/2023. On 07/13/2023 during medication pass, R1 was found inside their bedroom in a frog-like position facing downward at the foot of their bed. Staff #1 (S1) checked R1’s vitals and observed R1 to have redness around their calf of their legs, but no blistering. Emergency Services were activated and R1 was sent out and admitted to a local hospital from 07/13/2023 to 08/02/2023. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 22, 2025 · control 18-AS-20230713151454
May 20, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not allow resident access to telephone. Licensee did not allow resident to leave facility.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegations. LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Executive Director Monica Flores. On 05/16/2025 it was alleged that Licensee did not allow Resident 1 (R1) access to a telephone and did not allow R1 to leave the facility. The Department’s investigation consisted of an unannounced facility visit, interviews with facility staff, residents, outside sources, and records review. Staff interviews consistently revealed that R1 was allowed to receive phone calls from outside parties and family and that the facility assisted with the communication. Additionally staff informed that R1 had a personal cell phone in their possession that they used, and sometimes misplaced around the facility. Outside source interviews did not corroborate the allegation, as outside sources informed that they had directly observed the facility assisting R1 wthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 20, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250516142641
May 14, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 4, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Uncleared staff caring for residents.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to initiate and deliver findings for a complaint investigation regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA identified themselves and met with Executive Director Monica Flores, to discuss the purpose of the visit and elements of the complaint. During the visit LPA collected facility records, and interviewed staff. On 03/28/2025 it was alleged that an uncleared staff was caring for residents due to being underage. Staff interviews revealed that the staff in question had a valid work permit, approved by their school, to work at the facility during the summer of 2024. Review of facility records corroborated staff statements, showing that the staff member had the legal background check documents and records in their file. Based on interviews, direct LPA observations and records review, a preponderance of evidence does not exist to prove that the alleged violation occurred, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 4, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250328163548
Mar 30, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff yells at residents.

On March 30, 2025, the California Department of Social Services Community Care Licensing (CDSS/CCL) Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ernand Dabuet conducted a subsequent visit to gather information regarding the above allegation. LPA met with Philip Green, the Food Services Director, and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA contacted Monica Flores, Executive Director, and informed Flores of the intention of the visit. The investigation consisted of Interviews, a collection of records, and a tour of the facility. Interviews were conducted with staff members #1 to #7 (S1-S7) and resident members #1 to #9 (R1-R9). List of documents reviewed/obtained Resident Roster (dated 09/28/23 & 03/29/25), Staff Roster (dated 10/11/23 & 03/29/25), (R1)'s Physicians Report LIC 602 (dated 06/01/22 and 11/02/22), Residence and Care Agreement (dated 06/06/22), Resident Assessment (dated 06/03/22), Identification and Emergency Information LIC 601 (dated 06/02/22), and other pertinent documents associatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 30, 2025 · control 18-AS-20231006100625
Mar 29, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not assisting resident with transportation. Staff are not adhering to the admission agreement.

On March 29, 2025, the California Department of Social Services Community Care Licensing (CDSS/CCL) Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ernand Dabuet conducted a subsequent visit to gather information regarding the above allegations. LPA met with Monica Flores, Executive Director, and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA was granted entry to the facility. The investigation consisted of Interviews, a collection of records, and a tour of the facility. Interviews were conducted with staff members #1 to #7 (S1-S7) and resident members #1 to #9 (R1-R9). List of documents reviewed/obtained Resident Roster (dated 09/28/23 & 03/29/25), Staff Roster (dated 10/11/23 & 03/29/25), (R1)'s Physicians Report LIC 602 (dated 06/01/22 and 11/02/22), Residence and Care Agreement (dated 06/06/22), Resident Assessment (dated 06/03/22), Identification and Emergency Information LIC 601 (dated 06/02/22), and other pertinent documents associated with this complaint. (Evaluation Report continues LIC 9099-C) Thisthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 29, 2025 · control 18-AS-20230925083814
Mar 18, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not ensure provision of toilet paper. Licensee did not administer medication as prescribed

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation(s). LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Executive Director Angela Scott-Kapiloff. On 04/25/2024 it was alleged that Licensee did not ensure provision of toilet paper for residents, and Licensee did not administer medication as prescribed. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, review of facility and outside source records, interviews with facility staff, and outside sources. Staff members consistently referred to an existing facility policy that limited residents to 2 rolls of toilet paper per week. Staff stated that when a resident needs more than this, it is the family's responsibility to provide the additional toilet paper. Interviews were mixed regarding how strict the policy actually was, and some staff were unsure of the exact limit, offering that residents received 1 or 3 rolthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 18, 2025 · control 08-AS-20240425123147
Mar 18, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff physically abused resident.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation. LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Executive Director Angela Scott-Kapiloff. On 02/28/25 it was alleged that a staff member (S2) physically abused a resident (R1). The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, interviews with facility staff, residents, outside sources, and records review. Staff members interviewed unanimously denied ever seeing another staff member hit a resident. Staff interviews revealed that R1 was experiencing a change in condition, resulting in a delusion that they were being hit and harassed by S2 and two other parties. The accused staff member, S2, was aware of the accusation and stated that they elevated it up their chain of command, providing proof that they had been promoted to a new position, resulting them not seeing R1 often. S2 also informed that were not wthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 18, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250228102124
Mar 7, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee permanently changed resident's accomodations without required notice. Licensee did not answer communications from a representative promptly.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegations. LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Resident Services Director Nae Brownell. On 12/09/2024 it was alleged that Licensee permanently changed a resident's accommodations without required notice and Licensee did not answer communications from a representative promptly. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, review of facility and outside source records, interviews with facility staff, outside sources, and LPA direct observations. Regarding the allegation, "Licensee permanently changed resident's accommodations without required notice", it was alleged that a resident was permanently moved to a different room in the facility without the required written 30-day notice to the responsible party. Staff interviews corroborated the allegation, informing that residents on the second floor ofthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 7, 2025 · control 08-AS-20241209163025
Mar 7, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not answer resident's call button in a timely manner. Licensee did not ensure chemicals were properly stored.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation(s). LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Resident Services Director Nae Brownell. On 01/23/2025 it was alleged that staff did not answer resident's call button in a timely manner and Licensee did not ensure chemicals were properly stored. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, review of facility and outside source records, interviews with facility staff, residents, outside sources, and LPA direct observations. Staff interviews corroborated the allegation, staff informing that specific days of the week had particularly low staff, resulting in long resident wait times. Staff informed of observing approximately 40-minute wait times for resident pendants to be responded to. Staff informed that residents complained to them about the extended wait times, expressing concern about not beingthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 7, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250123111801
Mar 7, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 21, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Lack of supervision resulted in resident elopement.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation. LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Executive Director Angela Scott-Kapiloff. On 12/11/24 it was alleged that the Licensee's lack of supervision for Resident 1 (R1) resulted in R1 eloping from the facility. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, interviews with facility staff, residents, outside sources, and records review. Staff interviews consistently showed that R1 was almost completely independent and lived in the Assisted Living section of the building. The interviews did not corroborate that staff provided less supervision than was necessary for R1, as interviews showed that staff were aware that R1 was not able to leave the building unassisted, and redirected R1 when R1 attempted to leave by themselves earlier the day of the incident. Interviews revealed that staff were unawthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 21, 2025 · control 08-AS-20241211132531
Jan 24, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 15, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not follow infection control notification policy.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to initiate an investigation regarding the above complaint allegation and deliver findings. LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Executive Director Angela Scott-Kapiloff. LPA was away from the facility from 1:15pm to 2:15pm. On 01/06/2025 it was alleged that the Licensee did not follow the facility's infection control notification policy. The Department’s investigation consisted of an unannounced facility visit, interviews with facility staff, outside sources, and records review. Staff interviews revealed that the facility did not experience a Covid-19 outbreak during the timeframe of complaint, therefore community notification was not required. Staff informed that two (2) Covid-19 cases existed concurrently at the facility, which did not reach the level of outbreak status. (Continued on LIC9099-p.2) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 15, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250106152332
Jan 15, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20244 state visits · 4 documents
Jun 24, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 11, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not adhere to the admission agreement Licensee did not assist resident(s) with transportation

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Domingo conducted an unannounced visit to deliver the finding on the above mentioned complaint allegations. LPA Domingo identified herself and discussed the purpose of the visit with Executive Director Angela Scott-Kapiloff During the investigation, LPA Domingo collected pertinent resident records as well as facility documentation and conducted interviews with staff, residents and outside sources. It was alleged that the Licensee did not adhere to the admission agreement. The Reporting Party (RP) specified that the licensee did not provide basic cable and that the cable bill was not paid therefore the cable television was not working. LPA Domingo reviewed the entire admission agreement and basic cable television was no working. LPA Domingo reviewed the entire admission agreement and basic cable (Continue on LIC9099C) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 11, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240405151000
Feb 20, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 7, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 1
Type B citations8typical 1
Substantiated complaints8typical 2
Total complaints12typical 7
State visits on file25typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2023.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202611020251115420244402022220
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — San Diego County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home is on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (760) 480-8155

Is Gardens At Escondido licensed?

Yes — Gardens At Escondido is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Escondido (San Diego County): California license #374604545, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 101 residents. State records list 22 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated February 6, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Gardens At Escondido care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Gardens At Escondido with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordTHE FACILITY SERVES ELDERLY RESIDENTS; AGES 60 AND ABOVE; ALL OF WHOM MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY; 10 OF WHICH MAY BE BEDRIDDEN; HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 18 RESIDENTS; APPROVED FOR DELAYED EGRESS. NEW MGMT. CO. (ESCONDIDO EL NORTE MGR. LLC.) EFFECTIVE 2/18/25.

How much does Gardens At Escondido cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Gardens At Escondido's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Diego County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Gardens At Escondido accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Gardens At Escondido through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.

Medi-Cal / ALW homes in San Diego County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

74 of 101 beds occupied (73%) when the state visited on September 22, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Gardens At Escondido?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 25 state visits and 22 dated documents since 2022 for Gardens At Escondido; 12 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated September 22, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unfounded. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

12 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedDue to staff neglect, resident sustained a burn requiring hospitalization.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On 09/22/25 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javina George made an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings for the allegation noted above. LPA met with Monica Flores, Executive Director and explained the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegation. The allegation was investigated, and the investigation consisted of observations, interviews and records review. On 07/13/2023 Community Care Licensing received a complaint alleging due to staff neglect, resident sustained a burn requiring hospitalization. Resident #1 (R1) was admitted to the facility on 06/15/2023. On 07/13/2023 during medication pass, R1 was found inside their bedroom in a frog-like position facing downward at the foot of their bed. Staff #1 (S1) checked R1’s vitals and observed R1 to have redness around their calf of their legs, but no blistering. Emergency Services were activated and R1 was sent out and admitted to a local hospital from 07/13/2023 to 08/02/2023. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, September 22, 2025 · control 18-AS-20230713151454
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee did not allow resident access to telephone. Licensee did not allow resident to leave facility.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegations. LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Executive Director Monica Flores. On 05/16/2025 it was alleged that Licensee did not allow Resident 1 (R1) access to a telephone and did not allow R1 to leave the facility. The Department’s investigation consisted of an unannounced facility visit, interviews with facility staff, residents, outside sources, and records review. Staff interviews consistently revealed that R1 was allowed to receive phone calls from outside parties and family and that the facility assisted with the communication. Additionally staff informed that R1 had a personal cell phone in their possession that they used, and sometimes misplaced around the facility. Outside source interviews did not corroborate the allegation, as outside sources informed that they had directly observed the facility assisting R1 wCDSS inspection report, May 20, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250516142641
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedUncleared staff caring for residents.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to initiate and deliver findings for a complaint investigation regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA identified themselves and met with Executive Director Monica Flores, to discuss the purpose of the visit and elements of the complaint. During the visit LPA collected facility records, and interviewed staff. On 03/28/2025 it was alleged that an uncleared staff was caring for residents due to being underage. Staff interviews revealed that the staff in question had a valid work permit, approved by their school, to work at the facility during the summer of 2024. Review of facility records corroborated staff statements, showing that the staff member had the legal background check documents and records in their file. Based on interviews, direct LPA observations and records review, a preponderance of evidence does not exist to prove that the alleged violation occurred, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANCDSS inspection report, April 4, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250328163548
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff yells at residents.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On March 30, 2025, the California Department of Social Services Community Care Licensing (CDSS/CCL) Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ernand Dabuet conducted a subsequent visit to gather information regarding the above allegation. LPA met with Philip Green, the Food Services Director, and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA contacted Monica Flores, Executive Director, and informed Flores of the intention of the visit. The investigation consisted of Interviews, a collection of records, and a tour of the facility. Interviews were conducted with staff members #1 to #7 (S1-S7) and resident members #1 to #9 (R1-R9). List of documents reviewed/obtained Resident Roster (dated 09/28/23 & 03/29/25), Staff Roster (dated 10/11/23 & 03/29/25), (R1)'s Physicians Report LIC 602 (dated 06/01/22 and 11/02/22), Residence and Care Agreement (dated 06/06/22), Resident Assessment (dated 06/03/22), Identification and Emergency Information LIC 601 (dated 06/02/22), and other pertinent documents associatedCDSS inspection report, March 30, 2025 · control 18-AS-20231006100625
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not assisting resident with transportation. Staff are not adhering to the admission agreement.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On March 29, 2025, the California Department of Social Services Community Care Licensing (CDSS/CCL) Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ernand Dabuet conducted a subsequent visit to gather information regarding the above allegations. LPA met with Monica Flores, Executive Director, and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA was granted entry to the facility. The investigation consisted of Interviews, a collection of records, and a tour of the facility. Interviews were conducted with staff members #1 to #7 (S1-S7) and resident members #1 to #9 (R1-R9). List of documents reviewed/obtained Resident Roster (dated 09/28/23 & 03/29/25), Staff Roster (dated 10/11/23 & 03/29/25), (R1)'s Physicians Report LIC 602 (dated 06/01/22 and 11/02/22), Residence and Care Agreement (dated 06/06/22), Resident Assessment (dated 06/03/22), Identification and Emergency Information LIC 601 (dated 06/02/22), and other pertinent documents associated with this complaint. (Evaluation Report continues LIC 9099-C) ThisCDSS inspection report, March 29, 2025 · control 18-AS-20230925083814
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee did not ensure provision of toilet paper. Licensee did not administer medication as prescribed
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation(s). LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Executive Director Angela Scott-Kapiloff. On 04/25/2024 it was alleged that Licensee did not ensure provision of toilet paper for residents, and Licensee did not administer medication as prescribed. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, review of facility and outside source records, interviews with facility staff, and outside sources. Staff members consistently referred to an existing facility policy that limited residents to 2 rolls of toilet paper per week. Staff stated that when a resident needs more than this, it is the family's responsibility to provide the additional toilet paper. Interviews were mixed regarding how strict the policy actually was, and some staff were unsure of the exact limit, offering that residents received 1 or 3 rolCDSS inspection report, March 18, 2025 · control 08-AS-20240425123147
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff physically abused resident.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation. LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Executive Director Angela Scott-Kapiloff. On 02/28/25 it was alleged that a staff member (S2) physically abused a resident (R1). The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, interviews with facility staff, residents, outside sources, and records review. Staff members interviewed unanimously denied ever seeing another staff member hit a resident. Staff interviews revealed that R1 was experiencing a change in condition, resulting in a delusion that they were being hit and harassed by S2 and two other parties. The accused staff member, S2, was aware of the accusation and stated that they elevated it up their chain of command, providing proof that they had been promoted to a new position, resulting them not seeing R1 often. S2 also informed that were not wCDSS inspection report, March 18, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250228102124
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee permanently changed resident's accomodations without required notice. Licensee did not answer communications from a representative promptly.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegations. LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Resident Services Director Nae Brownell. On 12/09/2024 it was alleged that Licensee permanently changed a resident's accommodations without required notice and Licensee did not answer communications from a representative promptly. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, review of facility and outside source records, interviews with facility staff, outside sources, and LPA direct observations. Regarding the allegation, "Licensee permanently changed resident's accommodations without required notice", it was alleged that a resident was permanently moved to a different room in the facility without the required written 30-day notice to the responsible party. Staff interviews corroborated the allegation, informing that residents on the second floor ofCDSS inspection report, March 7, 2025 · control 08-AS-20241209163025
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not answer resident's call button in a timely manner. Licensee did not ensure chemicals were properly stored.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation(s). LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Resident Services Director Nae Brownell. On 01/23/2025 it was alleged that staff did not answer resident's call button in a timely manner and Licensee did not ensure chemicals were properly stored. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, review of facility and outside source records, interviews with facility staff, residents, outside sources, and LPA direct observations. Staff interviews corroborated the allegation, staff informing that specific days of the week had particularly low staff, resulting in long resident wait times. Staff informed of observing approximately 40-minute wait times for resident pendants to be responded to. Staff informed that residents complained to them about the extended wait times, expressing concern about not beingCDSS inspection report, March 7, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250123111801
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLack of supervision resulted in resident elopement.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation. LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Executive Director Angela Scott-Kapiloff. On 12/11/24 it was alleged that the Licensee's lack of supervision for Resident 1 (R1) resulted in R1 eloping from the facility. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, interviews with facility staff, residents, outside sources, and records review. Staff interviews consistently showed that R1 was almost completely independent and lived in the Assisted Living section of the building. The interviews did not corroborate that staff provided less supervision than was necessary for R1, as interviews showed that staff were aware that R1 was not able to leave the building unassisted, and redirected R1 when R1 attempted to leave by themselves earlier the day of the incident. Interviews revealed that staff were unawCDSS inspection report, February 21, 2025 · control 08-AS-20241211132531
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee did not follow infection control notification policy.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to initiate an investigation regarding the above complaint allegation and deliver findings. LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Executive Director Angela Scott-Kapiloff. LPA was away from the facility from 1:15pm to 2:15pm. On 01/06/2025 it was alleged that the Licensee did not follow the facility's infection control notification policy. The Department’s investigation consisted of an unannounced facility visit, interviews with facility staff, outside sources, and records review. Staff interviews revealed that the facility did not experience a Covid-19 outbreak during the timeframe of complaint, therefore community notification was not required. Staff informed that two (2) Covid-19 cases existed concurrently at the facility, which did not reach the level of outbreak status. (Continued on LIC9099-p.2) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 15, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250106152332

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee did not adhere to the admission agreement Licensee did not assist resident(s) with transportation
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Domingo conducted an unannounced visit to deliver the finding on the above mentioned complaint allegations. LPA Domingo identified herself and discussed the purpose of the visit with Executive Director Angela Scott-Kapiloff During the investigation, LPA Domingo collected pertinent resident records as well as facility documentation and conducted interviews with staff, residents and outside sources. It was alleged that the Licensee did not adhere to the admission agreement. The Reporting Party (RP) specified that the licensee did not provide basic cable and that the cable bill was not paid therefore the cable television was not working. LPA Domingo reviewed the entire admission agreement and basic cable television was no working. LPA Domingo reviewed the entire admission agreement and basic cable (Continue on LIC9099C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 11, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240405151000

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 25 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
8
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
8
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
12
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
25
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(760) 480-8155
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Gardens At Escondido? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.