Las Villas Del Norte is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Escondido, San Diego County, California — state license #374604294, licensed for 198 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 35 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated May 29, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

11 homes in view

Las Villas Del Norte

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 198 residents · Escondido, CA · San Diego County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #374604294, held since 2020 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
1325 Las Villas Way · Escondido, San Diego County
Phone
(760) 741-1047
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 198 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 28 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 86 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 198 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 86 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 28.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 44 times and filed 35 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated May 29, 2026.

Most recent state visit
July 16, 2026
Occupancy at the January 10, 2025 visit
175 of 198 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 21 documents with transcribed findings, dated March 22, 2022 to January 10, 2025. 21 of the 21 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (11), “Unfounded” (3), “Unsubstantiated” (7). 21 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 21 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 18 of 35 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20261 state visit · 1 document
May 29, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20254 state visits · 4 documents
May 30, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 16, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 3, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 10, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not practicing proper food safety practices.

On 2/25/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Janette Romero arrived unannounced to deliver amended findings for the allegation listed above. LPA met with Administrator, Jolene Farish who was informed of the purpose of the visit. It was alleged the facility may have unsanitary food practices and servers did not wash their hands on 1/2/2025, due to a resident’s visitor falling ill after having a meal provided by the facility. LPA toured the facility, conducted interviews, and reviewed records. During tour of the kitchen, LPA observed the freezer was maintained at a temperature of 0 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and refrigerator at 31 degrees F. LPA also observed kitchen staff wearing gloves while preparing food. LPA observed perishable and non-perishable food stored in a safe manner. LPA toured the memory care bistro and did not observe any issues or concerns regarding food safety requirements. *This is an amended version of the original report. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 10, 2025 · control 18-AS-20250108152134
20249 state visits · 9 documents
Dec 12, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not provide healthful accomodations for resident.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Amy Rodgers conducted an unannounced visit to conclude the complaint investigation regarding the above mentioned allegations. LPA was greeted at the front lobby by Executive Director, Jolene Farish and was granted entry after identifying herself and disclosing the purpose of the visit, which was to further invistagate a complaint. During the invistagation the facility was toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff and outside sources. (continued on 9099-C) Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 12, 2024 · control 08-AS-20210628125732
Oct 21, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure a resident was properly fed Staff are mistreating a resident while in care

On 10/21/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Janette Romero made an unannounced visit to the facility to investigate the allegations listed above. LPA met with Administrator, Jolene Farish who was informed of the purpose of the visit. It was alleged a resident arrives to the dining room at 11:30 a.m. and their food is not served until 1:00 p.m. It was also alleged the resident walked away from the dining room with no food due to the long wait time(s). It was further alleged Staff 1 (S1) and Staff 2 (S2) yell at the resident and are rude to them. The alleged victim's name was not disclosed; therefore, LPA interviewed a sample of five (5) residents. Culinary Service Director (CSD), George "Lynn" Sharp was also interviewed and reported the facility offers a daily menu where breakfast is scheduled to be served at 8:00 a.m., lunch at 12:00 p.m and dinner at 5:00 p.m. CSD also reported the facility offers an alternative menu with options available from 8:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. Unsubstantiatthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 21, 2024 · control 18-AS-20241015095756
Sep 20, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 20, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure facility is clean

On 8/20/2024, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Janette Romero and Debbie Palacios arrived unannounced to deliver findings regarding the above complaint. LPAs met with Administrator, Jolene Farish and Resident Care Director (RCD), Ana Ramirez who were informed of the purpose of the visit. On 7/23/2024, it was alleged there is no housekeeping staff to clean the Memory Care Unit (MCU). On 7/31/2024, LPA Romero toured the facility, conducted interviews, and obtained copies of pertinent documentation. LPA Romero toured nine (9) resident bedrooms and bathrooms with Regional Director (RD), Nathan Condie and RCD Ramirez and observed six (6) of nine (9) resident bathrooms appeared to have feces stuck inside the toilet bowls, on the toilet seats, on the bathroom floor, and/or on the outside bedroom door handles. Three (3) of nine (9) resident bedrooms and bathrooms toured appeared to be in sanitary condition. LPA also observed feces on the floor in the shower near room 311. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 20, 2024 · control 18-AS-20240723150513
Jul 15, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Licensee does not ensure that resident(s) are provided with hot water while in care. Licensee does not ensure that the facility is clean or santized.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kathleen Banrasavong conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for a complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA met with Executive Director, Jolene M. Farish, where LPA explained the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegations. The investigation consisted of observation, interviews with staff members and residents, and records review. On 06/19/2024, Community Care Licensing received a complaint alleging facility does not ensure that the residents are provided with hot water while in care and the facility does not ensure that the facility is clean or sanitized. It was reported that the facility did not have hot water and shower the residents with cold water. LPA sampled 5 random resident’s rooms’ water temperature and all areas met regulation’s standards. Information obtained from an interview with Executive Director stated the facility has hot and cold water and there were no maintenance issues that would give thethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 15, 2024 · control 18-AS-20240619164822
Jun 14, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 22, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 12, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 4, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff overcharged resident for care

On 1/4/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janette Romero conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver amended findings regarding the allegation listed above. LPA met with Administrator Jolene Farish. Regarding the allegation of “Staff overcharged resident for care” it was alleged that Resident 1 (R1) was over charged for monthly care fees after the resident was absent from the facility for over fourteen days due to hospitalization. LPA reviewed R1’s Admission Agreement and found that on page 13, subsection 6, titled, “Absences” stated, “If you are absent from LAS VILLAS DEL NORTE for more than fourteen (14) consecutive days, you will receive a pro-rated credit toward your Monthly Care Fee starting on day fifteen (15).” *This is an amended version of the original report. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 4, 2024 · control 18-AS-20230728094657
20234 state visits · 4 documents
Dec 29, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 1, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Facility does not have adequate food supply.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Jacqueline Shaw Ross made an unannounced visit to the facility to commence a complaint investigation regarding the allegation listed above. LPA met with Jolene Farish, Executive Director and explained the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegation. During the investigation, LPA Shaw-Ross conducted interviews with five (5) residents, and five (5) staff members, that included the facility chef. The investigation also consisted of observation and record review. LPA was unable to interview additional witnesses due to not being able to obtain contact. On 9/28/2023, Community Care Licensing received a complaint alleging the facility does not have an adequate food supply. Of all five (5) residents interviewed, four (4) stated there was a supply of plenty of food and that food served was adequate. One (1) resident (R5), corroborated the allegation by stating they have a new chef and the food has not been so great. R5 further stated the kitchen stafthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 1, 2023 · control 18-AS-20230928103442
Oct 5, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 19, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident is severely neglected Resident is unsupervised Resident is not fed regularly

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tricia Danielson arrived unannounced to the facility to conclude an investigation into the allegations listed above. LPA met with Ana Cruz, Resident Services Director and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation "Resident is severely neglected", it was alleged on 5/16/2023, Resident #1 (R1) had been found covered in dried feces. Review of R1's Progress Notes dated 5/16/2023 revealed during rounds, and ten minutes prior to the incident, R1 was observed to be free of feces as they sat in the hallway. Two (2) of six (6) staff interviewed reported R1 had one (1) or two (2) instances of removing feces from their incontinent garment. LPA attempted to interview R1 however, R1 did not verbally respond to LPA's presence or inquires. Interview with R1's responsible party revealed they are happy with the care R1 is provided. Regarding the allegation "Resident is unsupervised", it was alleged R1 had been found sitting alone without the presence othe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 19, 2023 · control 18-AS-20230518160952
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations5typical 1
Type B citations7typical 1
Substantiated complaints12typical 2
Total complaints20typical 7
State visits on file44typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2020.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20261102025440202499320231012320227852021120
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — San Diego County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (760) 741-1047

Is Las Villas Del Norte licensed?

Yes — Las Villas Del Norte is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Escondido (San Diego County): California license #374604294, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 198 residents. State records list 35 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated May 29, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Las Villas Del Norte care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Las Villas Del Norte with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 198 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 86 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 28.

How much does Las Villas Del Norte cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Las Villas Del Norte's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Diego County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Las Villas Del Norte accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Las Villas Del Norte is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

175 of 198 beds occupied (88%) when the state visited on January 10, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Las Villas Del Norte?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 44 state visits and 35 dated documents since 2021 for Las Villas Del Norte; 21 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated January 10, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

21 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not practicing proper food safety practices.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 2/25/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Janette Romero arrived unannounced to deliver amended findings for the allegation listed above. LPA met with Administrator, Jolene Farish who was informed of the purpose of the visit. It was alleged the facility may have unsanitary food practices and servers did not wash their hands on 1/2/2025, due to a resident’s visitor falling ill after having a meal provided by the facility. LPA toured the facility, conducted interviews, and reviewed records. During tour of the kitchen, LPA observed the freezer was maintained at a temperature of 0 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and refrigerator at 31 degrees F. LPA also observed kitchen staff wearing gloves while preparing food. LPA observed perishable and non-perishable food stored in a safe manner. LPA toured the memory care bistro and did not observe any issues or concerns regarding food safety requirements. *This is an amended version of the original report. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 10, 2025 · control 18-AS-20250108152134

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee did not provide healthful accomodations for resident.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Amy Rodgers conducted an unannounced visit to conclude the complaint investigation regarding the above mentioned allegations. LPA was greeted at the front lobby by Executive Director, Jolene Farish and was granted entry after identifying herself and disclosing the purpose of the visit, which was to further invistagate a complaint. During the invistagation the facility was toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff and outside sources. (continued on 9099-C) SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 12, 2024 · control 08-AS-20210628125732
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure a resident was properly fed Staff are mistreating a resident while in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 10/21/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Janette Romero made an unannounced visit to the facility to investigate the allegations listed above. LPA met with Administrator, Jolene Farish who was informed of the purpose of the visit. It was alleged a resident arrives to the dining room at 11:30 a.m. and their food is not served until 1:00 p.m. It was also alleged the resident walked away from the dining room with no food due to the long wait time(s). It was further alleged Staff 1 (S1) and Staff 2 (S2) yell at the resident and are rude to them. The alleged victim's name was not disclosed; therefore, LPA interviewed a sample of five (5) residents. Culinary Service Director (CSD), George "Lynn" Sharp was also interviewed and reported the facility offers a daily menu where breakfast is scheduled to be served at 8:00 a.m., lunch at 12:00 p.m and dinner at 5:00 p.m. CSD also reported the facility offers an alternative menu with options available from 8:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. UnsubstantiatCDSS inspection report, October 21, 2024 · control 18-AS-20241015095756
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not ensure facility is clean
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 8/20/2024, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Janette Romero and Debbie Palacios arrived unannounced to deliver findings regarding the above complaint. LPAs met with Administrator, Jolene Farish and Resident Care Director (RCD), Ana Ramirez who were informed of the purpose of the visit. On 7/23/2024, it was alleged there is no housekeeping staff to clean the Memory Care Unit (MCU). On 7/31/2024, LPA Romero toured the facility, conducted interviews, and obtained copies of pertinent documentation. LPA Romero toured nine (9) resident bedrooms and bathrooms with Regional Director (RD), Nathan Condie and RCD Ramirez and observed six (6) of nine (9) resident bathrooms appeared to have feces stuck inside the toilet bowls, on the toilet seats, on the bathroom floor, and/or on the outside bedroom door handles. Three (3) of nine (9) resident bedrooms and bathrooms toured appeared to be in sanitary condition. LPA also observed feces on the floor in the shower near room 311. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 20, 2024 · control 18-AS-20240723150513
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee does not ensure that resident(s) are provided with hot water while in care. Licensee does not ensure that the facility is clean or santized.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kathleen Banrasavong conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for a complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA met with Executive Director, Jolene M. Farish, where LPA explained the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegations. The investigation consisted of observation, interviews with staff members and residents, and records review. On 06/19/2024, Community Care Licensing received a complaint alleging facility does not ensure that the residents are provided with hot water while in care and the facility does not ensure that the facility is clean or sanitized. It was reported that the facility did not have hot water and shower the residents with cold water. LPA sampled 5 random resident’s rooms’ water temperature and all areas met regulation’s standards. Information obtained from an interview with Executive Director stated the facility has hot and cold water and there were no maintenance issues that would give theCDSS inspection report, July 15, 2024 · control 18-AS-20240619164822
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff overcharged resident for care
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 1/4/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janette Romero conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver amended findings regarding the allegation listed above. LPA met with Administrator Jolene Farish. Regarding the allegation of “Staff overcharged resident for care” it was alleged that Resident 1 (R1) was over charged for monthly care fees after the resident was absent from the facility for over fourteen days due to hospitalization. LPA reviewed R1’s Admission Agreement and found that on page 13, subsection 6, titled, “Absences” stated, “If you are absent from LAS VILLAS DEL NORTE for more than fourteen (14) consecutive days, you will receive a pro-rated credit toward your Monthly Care Fee starting on day fifteen (15).” *This is an amended version of the original report. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 4, 2024 · control 18-AS-20230728094657

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility does not have adequate food supply.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Jacqueline Shaw Ross made an unannounced visit to the facility to commence a complaint investigation regarding the allegation listed above. LPA met with Jolene Farish, Executive Director and explained the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegation. During the investigation, LPA Shaw-Ross conducted interviews with five (5) residents, and five (5) staff members, that included the facility chef. The investigation also consisted of observation and record review. LPA was unable to interview additional witnesses due to not being able to obtain contact. On 9/28/2023, Community Care Licensing received a complaint alleging the facility does not have an adequate food supply. Of all five (5) residents interviewed, four (4) stated there was a supply of plenty of food and that food served was adequate. One (1) resident (R5), corroborated the allegation by stating they have a new chef and the food has not been so great. R5 further stated the kitchen stafCDSS inspection report, December 1, 2023 · control 18-AS-20230928103442
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident is severely neglected Resident is unsupervised Resident is not fed regularly
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tricia Danielson arrived unannounced to the facility to conclude an investigation into the allegations listed above. LPA met with Ana Cruz, Resident Services Director and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation "Resident is severely neglected", it was alleged on 5/16/2023, Resident #1 (R1) had been found covered in dried feces. Review of R1's Progress Notes dated 5/16/2023 revealed during rounds, and ten minutes prior to the incident, R1 was observed to be free of feces as they sat in the hallway. Two (2) of six (6) staff interviewed reported R1 had one (1) or two (2) instances of removing feces from their incontinent garment. LPA attempted to interview R1 however, R1 did not verbally respond to LPA's presence or inquires. Interview with R1's responsible party revealed they are happy with the care R1 is provided. Regarding the allegation "Resident is unsupervised", it was alleged R1 had been found sitting alone without the presence oCDSS inspection report, September 19, 2023 · control 18-AS-20230518160952
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not providing resident with a refund
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 1/4/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janette Romero conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver an amended version of this report. LPA met with Administrator, Jolene Farish. Regarding the allegation of “Staff are not providing resident with a refund” it was alleged that Resident 1 (R1) did not receive a refund for monthly care fees overcharged during R1’s absence from the facility. LPA reviewed R1’s Admission Agreement and found that on page 13, subsection 6, titled, “Absences” stated, “If you are absent from LAS VILLAS DEL NORTE for more than fourteen (14) consecutive days, you will receive a pro-rated credit toward your Monthly Care Fee starting on day fifteen (15).” *This is an amended version of the original report UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 3, 2023 · control 18-AS-20230728094657
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff neglect resulting in resident falling and sustaining a hip fracture Resident pushed out of wheelchair and sustaining a shoulder fracture
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tricia Danielson arrived unannounced to the facility to conclude an investigation into the allegations listed above. LPA met with Resident Care Director Ana Cruz and Memory Care Director Klarrisa Romero and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation “Resident pushed out of wheelchair and sustained a shoulder fracture due to lack of supervision”, it was alleged that Resident #1(R1) was pushed out of their wheelchair by two unknown women resulting in a shoulder fracture. Interview conducted with Memory Care Director Ana Cruz revealed R1 was admitted to the facility in 2019, was ambulatory at times and utilized a wheelchair other times due to personal preference. Review of R1’s Preplacement Appraisal dated 10/13/2019 revealed R1 was able to transfer to and from bed without assistance. Review of R1’s 90 day Level of Care Assessment dated 01/07/2020 and 180 day Level of Care Assessment dated 07/05/2021 revealed R1 was able to transfer indepeCDSS inspection report, May 23, 2023 · control 18-AS-20221209153932
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedPersonal Rights Violation
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst(LPA) Tricia Danielson arrived unannounced to the facility to initiate an investigation into the allegation listed above. LPA met with Executive Director(ED) Jolene Farish and Memory Care Director(MCD) Ana Cruz and explained the purpose of the visit. During today's visit, LPA interviewed three(3) staff. Regarding the allegation "Personal Rights Violation", it was alleged that Residents #1(R1) and #2(R2) had accumulated approximately four(4) months of mail dating back to at least October 2022 at the facility and was not provided to them or their responsible party. Interviews conducted with facility staff indicated that mail is supposed to be given to the responsible party during times of visit by the front desk staff if the resident is incapable of handling the mail. Interview conducted with R1 and R2's responsible party revealed they were not aware mail was accumulating at the facility. Interview conducted with R1 and R2's family representative revealed they haCDSS inspection report, February 16, 2023 · control 18-AS-20230213152700
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not answer the resident's call button in a timely manner
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst(LPA) Tricia Danielson arrived unannounced to the facility to conclude a complaint investigation into the allegation list above. LPA met with Memory Care Director Ana Cruz and informed her of the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation "Staff did not answer the resident's call button in a timely manner", it was alleged that on May 14, 2022, Resident #1(R1) activated their call button and waited over thirty(30) minutes for staff to respond. Records reviewed indicated that on May 14, 2022, R1 activated their call button a total of six(6) times. R1's call button activation on May 14, 2022 at 11:06 AM resulted in a staff response time of thirty-five(35) minutes and eleven(11) seconds. R1's call button activation on May 14, 2022 at 2:38 PM resulted in a staff response time of thirty-nine(39) minutes and eleven(11) seconds. R1 could not be interviewed. Based on records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegatioCDSS inspection report, January 25, 2023 · control 18-AS-20220922143233
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not properly supervise residents Staff did not assist resident with medical device Staff did not safeguard resident's personal belongings
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tricia Danielson arrived unannounced to the facility to conclude an investigation into the allegations listed above. LPA met with Memory Care Director Ana Cruz and explained the purpose of today's visit. This visit was incorrectly identified as having been conducted 1/24/2023. The visit was actually conducted 1/25/2023. *This is an amended report. Regarding the allegation "Staff do not properly supervise residents", it was alleged that memory care residents were left unsupervised and then wandered into Resident #1's (R1) room and interupted R1's visit with family. Interviews conducted with staff indicated approximately ten(10) to twelve(12) residents are assigned to each caregiver during AM shift, ten(10) to fifteen(15) residents are assigned to each caregiver during PM shift, and fifteen(15) residents are assigned to each caregiver during NOC shift. There are four(4) additional staff assigned to memory care each AM shift to assist and supervise residentCDSS inspection report, January 24, 2023 · control 18-AS-20220602121633
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedInsufficient staffing to meet residents’ needs Facility doesn’t have enough supplies Facility did not provide adequate food service
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst(LPA) Tricia Danielson arrived unannounced to the facility to conclude an investigaton into the allegations listed above. LPA met with Executive Director Jolene Farish and explained the purpose of the visit. During today's visit, LPA interviewed one(1) staff. Regarding the allegation "Insufficient staffing to meet resident's needs", it was alleged that the needs of residents in the memory care unit were not being met due to a lack of staffing due to a high turnover rate. Interviews conducted with six(6) memory care residents revealed three(3) of six(6) memory care residents reported their needs were met or exceeded by the staff in the memory care unit. Three(3) of six(6) memory care residents were unable to be qualified to be reliable witnesses. Interviews conducted with five(5) memory care staff revealed four(4) to five(5) staff are scheduled for each AM shift, three(3) to four(4) staff are scheduled for each PM shift, and two(2) to three(3) staff are scheduleCDSS inspection report, January 6, 2023 · control 18-AS-20220712101108
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not respond to resident's call for assistance in a timely manner
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst(LPA) Tricia Danielson arrived unannounced to the facility to conclude an investigation into the allegation listed above. LPA met with Executive Director Jolene Farish and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation "Staff did not respond to resident's call for assistance in a timely manner", it was alleged that when Resident #1(R1) activated their call pendant, it took staff forty(40) minutes to one(1) hour to respond. It was further alleged that R1 had fallen from their scooter on one occasion and waited for hours on the floor for assistance. Interviews were conducted with ten(10) residents. Nine(9) of ten(10) residents reported facility staff do respond to call lights in a timely manner. One(1) of ten(10) residents interviewed has not utilized the call light system. However, records reviewed indicated R1 activated their call light thirty-seven(37) times in the period in question. Only forteen(14) of R1's thirty-seven(37) call lights were resCDSS inspection report, January 6, 2023 · control 18-AS-20220720173917

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 44 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
5
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
7
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
12
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
20
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
44
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(760) 741-1047
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Las Villas Del Norte? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.