La Jolla Casa Pacifica is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in La Jolla, San Diego County, California — state license #374604422, with a licensed capacity of 6, listed as closed, change of ownership in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 10 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated September 30, 2025 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

300 homes in view

La Jolla Casa Pacifica

The state record lists this licence as “Closed, Change of Ownership”. A closed licence cannot admit residents. We keep closed licences published because “is this place licensed?” deserves an honest answer.

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 6 residents · La Jolla, CA · San Diego County
Closed in state recordWheelchairHospiceBedriddenMemory care not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days · we confirm by phone before any referral
License #374604422, held since 2021 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
5468 Pacifica Dr · La Jolla, San Diego County
Phone
(858) 775-6935
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 6 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 2 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 1 resident

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. BDRM #5 FOR BEDRIDDEN ONLY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 2 RESIDENTS.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 11 times and filed 10 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on September 30, 2025 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

Most recent state visit
September 30, 2025
Occupancy at the September 5, 2025 visit
3 of 6 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 4 documents with transcribed findings, dated March 3, 2022 to September 30, 2025. 4 of the 4 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 4 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 4 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 7 of 10 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20255 state visits · 6 documents
Sep 30, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff sexually abused resident Staff physically abused resident resulting in injuries Facility did not provide hygiene supplies Facility did not ensure face masks were available to visitors. Licensee did not comply with reporting requirements

*** This is an Amended Report *** On 9/30/2025, LPA Grace Donato conducted a telephone interview with the facility to deliver findings. LPA spoke with Administrator Jennifer Fernandez and explained the purpose of the call. Regarding the allegation of staff sexually abused resident and physically abused resident resulting in injuries, Reporting party (RP) stated that on 3/3/22 early in the morning, resident (R1) had been molested by a night time staff member (S1). During the course of the investigation, staff members were interviewed, and records were reviewed. On S1s interview, S1 shared that R1 will be combative and difficult when being changed. Sometimes R1 will be fine, but typically R1 is difficult and will resist. During R1s change, R1 was “screaming and yelling.” S1 denied grabbing or striking R1s legs. page 1 of 2 Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 30, 2025 · control 08-AS-20220308132302
Sep 22, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 22, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 5, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not follow reporting requirements regarding pending facility sale.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arian Golbakhsh conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above mentioned allegation. LPA was welcomed by, identified themselves to, and discussed the purpose of their visit to Caregiver Shahla Mirzaee. LPA spoke with Administrator Sonya Karpal over the phone as well to inform them of the reason for the visit and findings. On 04/16/2025, the Department received a complaint where it was alleged that the facility owners did not follow reporting requirements in informing the Department and residents/their responsible parties of the home being sold. Per Title 22 Regulation 87109(b), the Department, residents and/or resident responsible parties must be informed a minimum of 30-days prior to the transfer of property or at the time a bona-fide offer is made, whichever is longer. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, records review, and interviews with staff, residents, and outside sources. [Continued onthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 5, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250416111525
Aug 29, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 29, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide DNR form to emengency personnel Staff did not destroy resident's medication

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sabel Martinez conducted an unannounced follow up complaint investigation visit and delivered findings. The LPA introduced himself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Staff Linda Gonzalez. Licensee Gus Fernandez arrived during the visit and assisted the LPA. Throughout the investigation, the Department secured records and conducted interviews with external and internal sources. It was alleged staff did not provide a Do-Not Resuscitate (DNR) form to emergency personnel. On December 19th, 2024, it was reported to the Department staff summoned emergency medical personnel for Resident # 1 (R1), but staff did not provide paramedics R1’s DNR form. Interviews with internal and external sources confirmed R1 was on hospice and had a DNR form on file. During the incident in question, staff handed paramedics R1’s facility profile but did not hand paramedics R1’s DNR form. One source reported R1’s file had two DNR forms. (See LIC 9099-C for continuation of repthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2025 · control 08-AS-20241219145135
20241 state visit · 1 document
Aug 29, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 0
Type B citations2typical 0
Substantiated complaints2typical 0
Total complaints4typical 0
State visits on file11typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2021.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2025561202411020222202021110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$4,000$6,500 /mo
our estimate — San Diego County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,000 · statewide low$8,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one.
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →

Is La Jolla Casa Pacifica licensed?

No — not currently. The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists La Jolla Casa Pacifica in La Jolla (San Diego County), California license #374604422, as “Closed, Change Of Ownership, formerly licensed for 6 residents. State records list 10 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated September 30, 2025, was marked “Unsubstantiated” by the state.

Can La Jolla Casa Pacifica care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists La Jolla Casa Pacifica with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. BDRM #5 FOR BEDRIDDEN ONLY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 2 RESIDENTS.

How much does La Jolla Casa Pacifica cost?

California's public licensing record does not include La Jolla Casa Pacifica's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Diego County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does La Jolla Casa Pacifica accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

La Jolla Casa Pacifica is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

3 of 6 beds occupied (50%) when the state visited on September 5, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for La Jolla Casa Pacifica?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 11 state visits and 10 dated documents since 2021 for La Jolla Casa Pacifica; 4 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated September 30, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

4 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff sexually abused resident Staff physically abused resident resulting in injuries Facility did not provide hygiene supplies Facility did not ensure face masks were available to visitors. Licensee did not comply with reporting requirements
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
*** This is an Amended Report *** On 9/30/2025, LPA Grace Donato conducted a telephone interview with the facility to deliver findings. LPA spoke with Administrator Jennifer Fernandez and explained the purpose of the call. Regarding the allegation of staff sexually abused resident and physically abused resident resulting in injuries, Reporting party (RP) stated that on 3/3/22 early in the morning, resident (R1) had been molested by a night time staff member (S1). During the course of the investigation, staff members were interviewed, and records were reviewed. On S1s interview, S1 shared that R1 will be combative and difficult when being changed. Sometimes R1 will be fine, but typically R1 is difficult and will resist. During R1s change, R1 was “screaming and yelling.” S1 denied grabbing or striking R1s legs. page 1 of 2 UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 30, 2025 · control 08-AS-20220308132302
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee did not follow reporting requirements regarding pending facility sale.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arian Golbakhsh conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above mentioned allegation. LPA was welcomed by, identified themselves to, and discussed the purpose of their visit to Caregiver Shahla Mirzaee. LPA spoke with Administrator Sonya Karpal over the phone as well to inform them of the reason for the visit and findings. On 04/16/2025, the Department received a complaint where it was alleged that the facility owners did not follow reporting requirements in informing the Department and residents/their responsible parties of the home being sold. Per Title 22 Regulation 87109(b), the Department, residents and/or resident responsible parties must be informed a minimum of 30-days prior to the transfer of property or at the time a bona-fide offer is made, whichever is longer. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, records review, and interviews with staff, residents, and outside sources. [Continued onCDSS inspection report, September 5, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250416111525
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not provide DNR form to emengency personnel Staff did not destroy resident's medication
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sabel Martinez conducted an unannounced follow up complaint investigation visit and delivered findings. The LPA introduced himself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Staff Linda Gonzalez. Licensee Gus Fernandez arrived during the visit and assisted the LPA. Throughout the investigation, the Department secured records and conducted interviews with external and internal sources. It was alleged staff did not provide a Do-Not Resuscitate (DNR) form to emergency personnel. On December 19th, 2024, it was reported to the Department staff summoned emergency medical personnel for Resident # 1 (R1), but staff did not provide paramedics R1’s DNR form. Interviews with internal and external sources confirmed R1 was on hospice and had a DNR form on file. During the incident in question, staff handed paramedics R1’s facility profile but did not hand paramedics R1’s DNR form. One source reported R1’s file had two DNR forms. (See LIC 9099-C for continuation of repCDSS inspection report, April 29, 2025 · control 08-AS-20241219145135

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility not taking measures to prevent COVID-19.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Liliana Silveira conducted an unannounced visit to open a complaint investigation regarding the above mentioned allegations. LPA identified themselves, stated the purpose of the visit and was granted entry by House Manager Violet German. During this visit and based on a review of records, it was determined that this Complaint was assigned to the incorrect facility. Therefore, the allegation was determined to be unfounded, meaning, it is false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis. The Complaint is closed without investigation. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report along with Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 01/16) was provided to Administrator Jennfer Fernandez via email. An electronic email receipt confirms the documents were received. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, March 3, 2022 · control 08-AS-20220224172508

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 11 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
2
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
2
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
4
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
11
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →

Who runs La Jolla Casa Pacifica?

From the CDSS ownership record, checked August 9, 2026.

Licensed to Kevory Holding Company, Inc, who operates 3 licensed California homes in total. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(858) 775-6935
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run La Jolla Casa Pacifica? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.