Oakmont Of Pacific Beach is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in San Diego, San Diego County, California — state license #374604281, licensed for 92 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 29 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated July 15, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.
No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.
Since 2021, the state has visited this home 32 times and filed 29 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated July 15, 2026.
The state's published file for this home includes 6 documents with transcribed findings, dated February 10, 2023 to April 1, 2026. 6 of the 6 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (4). 6 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.
Summary composed by computer from the 6 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
What the state’s words mean
Jul 15, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Jul 15, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
May 28, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
May 18, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
May 6, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Apr 1, 2026Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility is in disrepair.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janet Ngallo conducted an unannounced visit to initiate a complaint investigation regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit and elements of the complaint to Executive Director Shawn Amirhoushmand. On 03/25/2026, it was alleged that the facility is in disrepair. The department's investigation consisted of interviews, LPA observations, and records review. (Cont. on LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 1, 2026 · control 08-AS-20260325095141
Oct 16, 2025Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not meet the needs of a resident with dementia.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Dang Nguyen conducted an unannounced subsequent visit to deliver a finding regarding the above prior complaint allegation. LPA was welcomed by, identified himself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Health Services Director Keisha Bean. The Complainant alleged that facility staff did not meet the needs of resident [Resident #1 (R1)] with dementia. [See LIC 811 Confidential Names List for of select person identifiers used in this report.] CCLD’s investigation involved multiple unannounced facility tours/welfare checks and multiple interviews of relevant managers, frontline staff, and outside sources. The Department also reviewed pertinent administrative files, care records, and E-mail correspondence. [CONTINUED ON LIC 9099, 1 of 2] Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 16, 2025 · control 08-AS-20210602083905
Jul 30, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Licensee did not ensure reesident received needed toenail care.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Iby Strong conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings in the above complaint allegation. LPA identified herself and discussed the purpose of the visit with Executive Director Emily Turner.-On May 20, 2025, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging licensee did not ensure Resident 1 (R1) received needed toenail care. During investigation, the Department collected pertinent resident records as well as facility documentation and conducted interviews. According to R1 records collected, R1 needs assistance with grooming. Care plan state facility is to provide assistance with keeping nails clean but excludes nail trimming. Interview with staff revealed staff provided regular toenail filing. Interview with outside source revealed that R1 was receiving end of life care as well as regular nail care. Lastly, outside source interviews did not reveal any information to establish facility was no providing care to R1.-Based on interviews, outhe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 30, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250520161358
Jul 30, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Jul 8, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure facility is kept free of pests for residents in care
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA met with the Executive Director, Emily Turner. During the investigation, the facility was briefly toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff and outside sources. It was alleged that staff did not ensure the facility is kept free of pests for residents in care. An outside source reported the facility had bed bugs in a resident’s apartment and the facility was not taking care of the infestation. Today, LPA observed the apartment, there were no residents, furniture, or belongings present. The resident couple that resided in that apartment are no longer at the facility. Staff interviews revealed bed bugs were not observed in the residents’ room, when they would enter daily to collect the trash and check on the residents. Staff explained they did not provide care for the residents, as they were independent of their activities of daily living, onlythe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 8, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250702091127
Nov 26, 2024Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility did not provide medical attention.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation. LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Interim Executive Director Kathleen Olson. On 1/27/2021 it was alleged that the facility did not provide medical attention to a resident by not initiating 911 services after the resident suffered a fall with evidence of a head injury. The Department’s investigation consisted of a virtual facility visit, an unannounced facility visit, review of facility and outside source records, interviews with facility staff, residents, and outside sources. Staff interviews revealed that on the day of incident, Resident 1 (R1) was found sitting on the floor of their room with evidence of a head injury. Interviews further revealed that approximately one (1) hour after the fall, an outside provider arrived to the facility and initiated 911 services for R1 after contacting R1's physician, who recothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 26, 2024 · control 08-AS-20210127183451
Aug 27, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Jul 22, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Apr 15, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Feb 9, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Feb 1, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Jan 17, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Oct 6, 2023Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Aug 14, 2023Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Year-by-year trend
Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.
No Google listing is on file for this home. When one exists, its rating, review themes, and hours appear here — attributed to Google, never blended with the state record, and never part of how we rank homes.
This home hasn’t added its own details yet. When the operator claims this page, their photos, tour video, activities, languages, and staffing answers appear here — always labeled as theirs, never blended with the state record. Operators: claim your home, free →
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Is Oakmont Of Pacific Beach licensed?
Yes — Oakmont Of Pacific Beach is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in San Diego (San Diego County): California license #374604281, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 92 residents. State records list 29 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated July 15, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.
Can Oakmont Of Pacific Beach care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?
From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.
The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Oakmont Of Pacific Beach with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.
From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.
What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 92 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 8 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 8. DELAYED EGRESS APPROVED.
How much does Oakmont Of Pacific Beach cost?
California's public licensing record does not include Oakmont Of Pacific Beach's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Diego County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.
Does Oakmont Of Pacific Beach accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?
Oakmont Of Pacific Beach is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.
Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →
70 of 92 beds occupied (76%) when the state visited on April 1, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.
What do state inspections show for Oakmont Of Pacific Beach?
Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.
The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 32 state visits and 29 dated documents since 2021 for Oakmont Of Pacific Beach; 6 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated April 1, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated”. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.
Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.
2026
2025
2024
Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.
What the state has logged
California has logged 32 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.
You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.
(858) 373-9300Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.
Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →
See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →
This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →
Do you run Oakmont Of Pacific Beach? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.