Ivy Park At Escondido is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Escondido, San Diego County, California — state license #374604269, with a licensed capacity of 123, listed as closed, change of ownership in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 9 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated March 5, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

300 homes in view

Ivy Park At Escondido

The state record lists this licence as “Closed, Change of Ownership”. A closed licence cannot admit residents. We keep closed licences published because “is this place licensed?” deserves an honest answer.

The state also licenses a home at this address today: Ivy Park At Escondido · licence #371881684

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 123 residents · Escondido, CA · San Diego County
Closed in state recordWheelchairHospiceBedriddenMemory care not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days · we confirm by phone before any referral
License #374604269, held since 2020 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
930 Monticello Drive · Escondido, San Diego County
Phone
(760) 747-4888
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 123 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 25 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 7 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
EGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. ONE-HUNDRED TWENTY-THREE (123) NON-AMBULATORY RESIDENTS OF WHICH SEVEN (7) MAY BE BEDRIDDEN IN ROOMS 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, AND 114 ONLY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR TWENTY-FIVE (25) RESIDENTS. NEW MGMT. CO. (OAKMONT MGMT. GROUP, LLC) EFFECTIVE 9/30/24.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 9 times and filed 9 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on March 5, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Substantiated.”

Most recent state visit
March 5, 2026
Occupancy at that visit
0 of 0 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 5 documents with transcribed findings, dated June 14, 2022 to March 5, 2026. 5 of the 5 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unfounded” (4). 5 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 5 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 5 of 9 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20261 state visit · 1 document
Mar 5, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Medication error

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rankin issued final findings for this complaint. The facility closed on 5/1/25. The LPA delivered this report via e-mail, first class mail, and certified mail. During the initial visit on 10/30/24 from 8:36am to 10:15am, LPA Javina George interviewed Health Service Director, reviewed records, obtained and requested copies of pertinent documentation. On 3/4/26, LPA Rankin reviewed available documentation and interview notes. On the Allegation: Medication error. It was alleged that a resident was given the wrong medication on 10/18/2024. Documentation and an interview with the Health Services Director confirm that Resident 1 (R1) was provided medications that were prescribed for another resident on 10/18/2024. According to the facility’s LIC 624 Incident Report provided to Community Care Licensing, once the error was identified, staff contacted emergency medical services and R1 was transported to the hospital for further evaluation. Continue on 9099-C Substhe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 5, 2026 · control 18-AS-20241022131032
20251 state visit · 1 document
Jan 17, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20243 state visits · 3 documents
Jun 25, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Victim was left on floor until fire department arrived as a result of facility staff's negligence

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sara Martinez made an unannounced visit to the facility to commence a complaint investigation regarding the allegation listed above. LPA was granted entry and met with Executive Director Kimberly Malaspina who was informed of the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegation. During today's visit, LPA toured the facility, conducted staff and resident interviews, and reviewed documentation pertinent to the investigation. Regarding the allegation “Victim was left on floor until fire department arrived as a result of facility staff's negligence” it was reported Resident One (R1) had a fall at the facility and staff left R1 on the ground and refused to assist R1 up off of the floor due to facility’s policy. Interview with Reporting Party (RP) revealed R1 was on the ground and had stated they were experiencing back pain and hip pain. Interview with R1 revealed they had fallen in their room and told staff they were experiencing back pain but did notthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 25, 2024 · control 18-AS-20240621115113
May 9, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Uncleared adult is working at the facility.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javina George made an unannounced visit to the facility to commence a complaint investigation in regards to the allegation noted above. LPA met with Executive Director Kimberly Malaspina and explained the purpose of the visit and elements of the allegation. The allegation was investigated and the investigation consisted of observations, interviews, records review. On 05/08/24 Community Care Licensing received a complaint alleging that an uncleared adult was working at the facility specifically Staff #1 (S1). LPA conducted a review of the staff schedule and reviewed a payroll report which confirmed that S1 is actively working at the facility. LPA conducted a personnel inquiry in the Licensing Information System (LIS), which revealed that S1 was eligible for criminal record clearance effective 3/1/24. LPA further observed for S1 to have been associated to the facility since 3/1/24 and a second entry on 3/5/24. A review of S1s employee file revealed the prothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 9, 2024 · control 18-AS-20240508093535
Feb 28, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations1typical 1
Type B citations0typical 1
Substantiated complaints1typical 2
Total complaints5typical 7
State visits on file9typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2020.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20261112025110202433020231102022330
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — San Diego County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one.
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →

Is Ivy Park At Escondido licensed?

No — not currently. The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists Ivy Park At Escondido in Escondido (San Diego County), California license #374604269, as “Closed, Change Of Ownership, formerly licensed for 123 residents. State records list 9 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated March 5, 2026, was marked “Substantiated” by the state.

Can Ivy Park At Escondido care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Ivy Park At Escondido with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordEGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. ONE-HUNDRED TWENTY-THREE (123) NON-AMBULATORY RESIDENTS OF WHICH SEVEN (7) MAY BE BEDRIDDEN IN ROOMS 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, AND 114 ONLY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR TWENTY-FIVE (25) RESIDENTS. NEW MGMT. CO. (OAKMONT MGMT. GROUP, LLC) EFFECTIVE 9/30/24.

How much does Ivy Park At Escondido cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Ivy Park At Escondido's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Diego County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Ivy Park At Escondido accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Ivy Park At Escondido is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

0 of 0 beds occupied (0%) when the state visited on March 5, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Ivy Park At Escondido?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 9 state visits and 9 dated documents since 2022 for Ivy Park At Escondido; 5 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated March 5, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

5 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedMedication error
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rankin issued final findings for this complaint. The facility closed on 5/1/25. The LPA delivered this report via e-mail, first class mail, and certified mail. During the initial visit on 10/30/24 from 8:36am to 10:15am, LPA Javina George interviewed Health Service Director, reviewed records, obtained and requested copies of pertinent documentation. On 3/4/26, LPA Rankin reviewed available documentation and interview notes. On the Allegation: Medication error. It was alleged that a resident was given the wrong medication on 10/18/2024. Documentation and an interview with the Health Services Director confirm that Resident 1 (R1) was provided medications that were prescribed for another resident on 10/18/2024. According to the facility’s LIC 624 Incident Report provided to Community Care Licensing, once the error was identified, staff contacted emergency medical services and R1 was transported to the hospital for further evaluation. Continue on 9099-C SubsCDSS inspection report, March 5, 2026 · control 18-AS-20241022131032

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedVictim was left on floor until fire department arrived as a result of facility staff's negligence
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sara Martinez made an unannounced visit to the facility to commence a complaint investigation regarding the allegation listed above. LPA was granted entry and met with Executive Director Kimberly Malaspina who was informed of the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegation. During today's visit, LPA toured the facility, conducted staff and resident interviews, and reviewed documentation pertinent to the investigation. Regarding the allegation “Victim was left on floor until fire department arrived as a result of facility staff's negligence” it was reported Resident One (R1) had a fall at the facility and staff left R1 on the ground and refused to assist R1 up off of the floor due to facility’s policy. Interview with Reporting Party (RP) revealed R1 was on the ground and had stated they were experiencing back pain and hip pain. Interview with R1 revealed they had fallen in their room and told staff they were experiencing back pain but did notCDSS inspection report, June 25, 2024 · control 18-AS-20240621115113
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedUncleared adult is working at the facility.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javina George made an unannounced visit to the facility to commence a complaint investigation in regards to the allegation noted above. LPA met with Executive Director Kimberly Malaspina and explained the purpose of the visit and elements of the allegation. The allegation was investigated and the investigation consisted of observations, interviews, records review. On 05/08/24 Community Care Licensing received a complaint alleging that an uncleared adult was working at the facility specifically Staff #1 (S1). LPA conducted a review of the staff schedule and reviewed a payroll report which confirmed that S1 is actively working at the facility. LPA conducted a personnel inquiry in the Licensing Information System (LIS), which revealed that S1 was eligible for criminal record clearance effective 3/1/24. LPA further observed for S1 to have been associated to the facility since 3/1/24 and a second entry on 3/5/24. A review of S1s employee file revealed the proCDSS inspection report, May 9, 2024 · control 18-AS-20240508093535

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility not allowing resident to have visitors. Facility not allowing resident to make phone calls.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javina George made an unannounced visit to the facility to commence an investigation for the allegation(s) listed above. LPA George met with Kimberly Malaspina, Executive Director and explained the purpose of the visit and elements of the allegations. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging "Facility not allowing resident to have visitors LPA George conducted interviews which revealed Resident #1 (R1) POA requested for the facility staff to hold visitation until further notice. The directive was given due to a recent visit on 6/12/22 with an identified contact that was observed to be displaying concerning behavior with R1, with showing R1 the exits in the facility. Therefore the allegation is UNFOUNDED. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, June 16, 2022 · control 18-AS-20220615121652
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff confiscated a resident's cell phone while in care. Residents are not afforded privacy while on the telephone.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javina George made an unannounced visit to the facility to commence an investigation for the allegation(s) listed above. LPA George met with Kimberly Malaspina, Executive Director and explained the purpose of the visit and elements of the allegations. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging "Staff confiscated a resident's cell phone while in care. LPA George conducted interviews which revealed Resident #1 (R1) POA requested for the facility staff to confiscate R1s cell phone as it causes R1 to become confused and frustrated as they do not know how to properly work the The cell phone has resulted in R1 displaying disruptive behaviors, such as phone calls at 3am, dialing of random numbers and even calling 9-1-1. Therefore the allegation is UNFOUNDED. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, June 14, 2022 · control 18-AS-20220613115856

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 9 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
1
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
1
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
5
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
9
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(760) 747-4888
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Ivy Park At Escondido? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.