Cloisters Of The Valley, Llc is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in San Diego, San Diego County, California — state license #374604267, licensed for 70 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 50 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated June 16, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

4 homes in view

Cloisters Of The Valley, Llc

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 70 residents · San Diego, CA · San Diego County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #374604267, held since 2020 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
4171 Camino Del Rio South · San Diego, San Diego County
Phone
(619) 283-2226
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 70 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careVerified in record
Bedridden careApproved for 9 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 70 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 9 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. BEDRIIDEN NOT ALLOWED IN ROOMS 1, 2, 3, 22, AND 23. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 35 RESIDENTS.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 59 times and filed 50 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated June 16, 2026.

Most recent state visit
July 2, 2026
Occupancy at the September 10, 2025 visit
64 of 70 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 22 documents with transcribed findings, dated November 12, 2021 to September 10, 2025. 22 of the 22 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (8), “Unfounded” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (12). 22 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 22 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 36 of 50 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
202610 state visits · 12 documents
Jun 16, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 16, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 27, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 6, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 13, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 8, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 27, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 27, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 24, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 4, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 26, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 20, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20257 state visits · 10 documents
Dec 23, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 23, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 10, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 10, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not issue resident's responsible party a refund

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit regarding the above mentioned allegation. LPA met with Executive Director (ED), Tia Suuronen-Goodwin and Business Office Director (BOD), Susie Dizon. During the investigation, the facility was briefly toured, records reviewed and interviews conducted with staff and outside sources. It was alleged staff did not issue resident's responsible party a refund. It was reported Resident #1 (R1) went to the hospital on 07/02/24 and did not return to the facility. On 07/16/24, R1's belongings were removed from the facility. Outside Source (OS) reported they were made aware of the refunded portion on 10/24/24 with a balance of $2649.64 and unable to obtain the refund. OS also reported the BOD wanted the balance donated back to the facility. OS interview confirmed they did not agree to donate the balance and would like their refund. LPA reviewed an email sent from the BOD to OS indicating the balance amount owed and cothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 10, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250902111313
Aug 7, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure facility had hot water.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Hannah Rodgers conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation. LPA introduced thelf and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Executive Director Tia Suuronen-Goodwin. On April 3, 2025, it was alleged that staff did not ensure facility had hot water. The Department’s investigation consisted of an unannounced facility visit, records review, and staff, resident, and outside source interviews. According to the allegation, the facility did not have hot water for multiple consecutive days and the staff at the facility were aware that hot water was not working properly at the facility. [Continued on LIC9099-C] Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 7, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250403163513
Aug 7, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not issue a refund to the resident or authorized representative in a timely manner.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Hannah Rodgers conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation. LPA introduced self and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Executive Director Tia Suuronen-Goodwin. On May 5, 2025, it was alleged that staff did not issue a refund to the resident or authorized representative in a timely manner. The Department’s investigation consisted of an unannounced facility visit, records review, and staff, resident, and outside source interviews. According to the allegation, Resident #1 (R1) moved out of the facility on April 8, 2025, but did not receive a refund for the remaining days of the month. On May 16, 2025 R1’s representative received a refund, although on May 27, 2025 it was discovered that R1 received such refund as an accidental charge for May and did not receive a refund for April. [Continued on LIC9099-C] Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 7, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250509152921
Jul 18, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 12, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 30, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not seek timely medical care for resident. Staff did not notice change in condition of resident. Staff did not treat resident with dignity. Staff did not ensure resident went to doctor appointments.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Juliana Barfield conducted a subsequent complaint visit via telephone call regarding the above-mentioned allegations. LPA was connected to, identified herself to, and discussed the purpose of the telephone call with Executive Director Tia Suuronen-Goodwin. The Department's investigation consisted of records reviews and interviews with staff and outside sources. It was alleged that the Cloisters of the Valley (facility) staff did not seek timely medical care for Resident one (R1). Based on record review and interviews, R1 complained of stomach pain on 12/12/20 and 12/14/20 and staff scheduled a doctor visit for 12/16/20. When R1 had stomach cramps the following week, nursing staff and former Executive Director visited R1 on the Christmas holiday. R1 complained of stomach cramps on 01/02/21 and the staff gave R1 Tylenol. R1 felt sick on 1/05/21 and facility called 911. Based on records reviews and interviews, there is not substantial evidence to support ththe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 30, 2025 · control 08-AS-20210326122703
May 30, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20248 state visits · 9 documents
Nov 15, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 14, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Unlawful Eviction. Medications are not locked. Cleaning supplies are accessible to residents. Staff not meeting the needs of a resident. Staff did not treat resident with dignity.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Debbie Correia conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above-mentioned allegations. LPA identified herself to Business Director Susan Dizon, was granted entrance, and met with Resident Service Director (RSD) River Pagala, and discussed the purpose of the visit. The Department’s investigation consisted of facility, resident, and outside source records reviews, a facility tour, and staff interviews. It was alleged that Resident 1 (R1) was served an unlawful eviction, facility staff were not meeting R1’s needs, and facility staff did not treat R1 with dignity. A resident records review revealed R1 moved into the facility on March 19, 2020, with a Primary diagnosis of Invasive Ductal Carcinoma of the right breast with metastasis. Resident records also revealed R1’s did not have a history of aggressive or inappropriate behaviors, was able to leave unassisted, could communicate needs, and followed instructions. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 14, 2024 · control 08-AS-20210514092305
Oct 2, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee financially abused resident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Iby Strong conducted an unannounced visit to initiate a complaint investigation on the above-mentioned allegation. LPA identified herself and discussed the purpose of the visit with Business Director Suzie Dizon. On September 26, 2024, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging licensee financially abused Resident 1 (R1). During the investigation, LPA Strong collected pertinent resident records as well as facility documentation and conducted interviews. According to the allegation, R1 is expected to pay roughly $1398 per month out of pocket but is only receiving $1261 monthly from Social Security Income and the remaining balance of $137 per month is accumulating an ongoing balance for R1. Admissions Agreement reviewed revealed that R1 and responsible party agreed to a total monthly expense of $5,450 per month on October 24, 2023. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 2, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240926070542
Oct 2, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 21, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not notify responsible party of resident's change in care

On 8/21/24, at about 9:00 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Daniel Pena conducted a complaint investigation visit to the facility. After identifying himself, and explaining the purpose of the visit, LPA was allowed inside the facility. LPA discussed the elements of the complaint with Business Office Director, Suzie Dizon. On 07/31/2024, the Department received this complaint which alleged staff did not notify the responsible party of a resident's change in care. The Department's investigation included facility visits, interviews with residents, staff and outside sources and review of pertinent facility and outside agency records. Information obtained showed that staff transferred Resident 1 (See LIC811 to identify R1) from a private room to a shared room on July 22, 2024. Interviews with staff and an outside source revealed that on May 16, (CONTINUED ON LIC9099D) Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 21, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240731124908
Jun 26, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 13, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not provide resident or their representative a comprehensive description and fee schedule for services, as per the admission agreement

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Daniel Pena conducted an unannounced visit to initiate a complaint investigation. LPA introduced himself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Tia Suuronen-Goodwin, Executive Director. Upon completion of the visit and investigation, LPA delivered to Director Suuronen-Goodwin, the findings. On June, 4, 2024, CCLD received this complaint. It was alleged the Licensee did not provide Resident 1 (R1) or their representative a comprehensive description and fee schedule for services, as per the admission agreement. The Department’s investigation consisted of an unannounced facility visit, review of facility and resident records, and interviews with facility staff and outside sources. Staff interviews and record reviews provide evidence that the licensee transmitted, via electronic messaging, transaction records which listed the outstanding fees for R1’s care and services. (CONTINUED ON LIC9099-C) Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 13, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240604153214
Mar 27, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Medications are not being administered by appropriately skilled professionals Staff are not following physician's orders Residents are not accorded dignity in relationships with staff Staff are not meeting incontinence needs of residents

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Daniel Pena conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for the aforementioned allegations referenced in this complaint investigation. LPA identified himself and discussed the purpose of the visit with Executive Director, Tia Suuronen-Goodwin. On December 24, 2020, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging resident medications were not administered by skilled professionals, staff did not follow physician medication orders; did not provide incontinence assistance and did not accord residents dignity. During the investigation, LPA conducted a facility tour, obtained and reviewed copies of resident and staff records and facility documentation and interviewed pertinent staff and outside sources. Three of the four employees named in this complaint no longer work for the facility. Efforts were made to interview the former employees but not all were cooperative. Those providing statements denied participating in or witnessing other stathe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 27, 2024 · control 08-AS-20201224134935
Mar 15, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: -Unlawful eviction -Facility did not safeguard resident’s belongings -Facility did not respond to communications from resident’s authorized representative

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Daniel Pena, conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to initiate a complaint investigation. After introducing and identifying himself, LPA met with Executive Director of Operations, Chad Coleman, and discussed the elements of the complaint. On 03/08/2024, the Department received the following allegations: unlawful eviction of resident, facility did not safeguard a resident’s belongings, and the facility did not respond to communications with a resident’s authorized representative. The Department’s investigation consisted of record reviews, and interviews with facility staff and outside sources. Per facility records, Resident 1 (R1) was admitted to the facility on 12/10/2019. LPA reviewed the Facility Residence and Care Agreement (admission agreement). LPA observed R1’s electronic signature throughout the agreement. LPA also observed a section of the document titled, “Appendix J, Eviction Procedures, 22 CCR 87224(a).” R1’s electronic signature wasthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 15, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240308090955
20235 state visits · 5 documents
Nov 27, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 17, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Neglect to residents resulting in pressure injuries Neglect to residents resulting in urinary tract infections Neglect to residents resulting in skin conditions Neglect to residents resulting in falls Medications are not being administered according to physician's orders Insufficient staffing to meet residents’ needs Facility did not address rodent and roach infestation

On 11/17/2023, at about 9:35 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Daniel Pena conducted an unannounced visit to conclude a complaint. LPA identified himself, presented his department identification and discussed the allegations and findings with Disha Hall, Executive Director. On 6/2/2022, the Department received a complaint, alleging neglect resulted in resident pressure injuries, urinary tract infections, skin conditions and falls. Additionally, it was alleged the facility staff did not administer medications according to physician orders, had insufficient staffing and did not address pest infestations. The Department’s investigation consisted of facility inspection, record reviews, and interviews with staff and outside sources. According to this complaint, an outside source stated that facility staff did not turn a resident as required, resulting in pressure injuries. Per record reviews, the resident had several diagnoses, including Dementia, COPD and hypertension. Records also notethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 17, 2023 · control 08-AS-20220622093140
Nov 15, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not notify the authorized representative that resident had shingles

On 11/15/2023, at about 8:45 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Daniel Pena conducted an unannounced visit to investigate a complaint. LPA identified himself and discussed the allegation mentioned above with River Pagala, Resident Services Director. On 11/9/2023, the Department received a complaint, alleging the licensee did not inform a resident's authorized representative they (the resident) had shingles. The Department’s investigation consisted of facility inspection, record reviews, and interviews with staff and outside sources. According to the complaint, red spots were observed on Resident 1's (R1) body in August 2023. The facility sent a text message to an authorized representative that the facility physician prescribed a medicated ointment to address a rash on R1's body. The staff did not inform the authorized representative that R1 was diagnosed with shingles. According to the complaint, on October 31, 2023, a facility contract physician verbally advised R1's authorized reprethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 15, 2023 · control 08-AS-20231109092101
Oct 27, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 14, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not communicate with resident's representative prior to changing primary care physician

On 9/14/2023 at about 9:30 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Daniel Pena, conducted an unannounced complaint visit to the facility. After introducing and identifying himself, LPA met with Executive Director, Disha Hall, and discussed the elements of the complaint and purpose of the visit. During today's visit, LPA met with Director Hall to deliver investigative findings. On August 2, 2023, CCLD received a complaint alleging the facility did not communicate with Resident 1's (R1) representative prior to changing the R1's Primary Care Physician (PCP). It was also alleged; changes were made to R1's medications through a community based physician rather than consulting with R1's provider. The Department's investigation consisted of interviews with staff and outside sources as well as facility inspection and record reviews. It is undisputed, facility staff consulted with a community based provider in reviewing R1’s behavioral changes and medications. Records and interviews revealed, howethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 14, 2023 · control 08-AS-20230802134650
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations3typical 1
Type B citations16typical 1
Substantiated complaints23typical 2
Total complaints34typical 7
State visits on file59typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2020.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20261012020257102202489120231112320224502021222
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — San Diego County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home is on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (619) 283-2226

Is Cloisters Of The Valley, Llc licensed?

Yes — Cloisters Of The Valley, Llc is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in San Diego (San Diego County): California license #374604267, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 70 residents. State records list 50 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated June 16, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Cloisters Of The Valley, Llc care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Cloisters Of The Valley, Llc with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 70 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 9 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. BEDRIIDEN NOT ALLOWED IN ROOMS 1, 2, 3, 22, AND 23. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 35 RESIDENTS.

How much does Cloisters Of The Valley, Llc cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Cloisters Of The Valley, Llc's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Diego County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Cloisters Of The Valley, Llc accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Cloisters Of The Valley, Llc through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.

Medi-Cal / ALW homes in San Diego County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

64 of 70 beds occupied (91%) when the state visited on September 10, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Cloisters Of The Valley, Llc?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 59 state visits and 50 dated documents since 2021 for Cloisters Of The Valley, Llc; 22 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated September 10, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

22 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not issue resident's responsible party a refund
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit regarding the above mentioned allegation. LPA met with Executive Director (ED), Tia Suuronen-Goodwin and Business Office Director (BOD), Susie Dizon. During the investigation, the facility was briefly toured, records reviewed and interviews conducted with staff and outside sources. It was alleged staff did not issue resident's responsible party a refund. It was reported Resident #1 (R1) went to the hospital on 07/02/24 and did not return to the facility. On 07/16/24, R1's belongings were removed from the facility. Outside Source (OS) reported they were made aware of the refunded portion on 10/24/24 with a balance of $2649.64 and unable to obtain the refund. OS also reported the BOD wanted the balance donated back to the facility. OS interview confirmed they did not agree to donate the balance and would like their refund. LPA reviewed an email sent from the BOD to OS indicating the balance amount owed and coCDSS inspection report, September 10, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250902111313
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure facility had hot water.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Hannah Rodgers conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation. LPA introduced thelf and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Executive Director Tia Suuronen-Goodwin. On April 3, 2025, it was alleged that staff did not ensure facility had hot water. The Department’s investigation consisted of an unannounced facility visit, records review, and staff, resident, and outside source interviews. According to the allegation, the facility did not have hot water for multiple consecutive days and the staff at the facility were aware that hot water was not working properly at the facility. [Continued on LIC9099-C] SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 7, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250403163513
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not issue a refund to the resident or authorized representative in a timely manner.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Hannah Rodgers conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation. LPA introduced self and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Executive Director Tia Suuronen-Goodwin. On May 5, 2025, it was alleged that staff did not issue a refund to the resident or authorized representative in a timely manner. The Department’s investigation consisted of an unannounced facility visit, records review, and staff, resident, and outside source interviews. According to the allegation, Resident #1 (R1) moved out of the facility on April 8, 2025, but did not receive a refund for the remaining days of the month. On May 16, 2025 R1’s representative received a refund, although on May 27, 2025 it was discovered that R1 received such refund as an accidental charge for May and did not receive a refund for April. [Continued on LIC9099-C] UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 7, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250509152921
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not seek timely medical care for resident. Staff did not notice change in condition of resident. Staff did not treat resident with dignity. Staff did not ensure resident went to doctor appointments.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Juliana Barfield conducted a subsequent complaint visit via telephone call regarding the above-mentioned allegations. LPA was connected to, identified herself to, and discussed the purpose of the telephone call with Executive Director Tia Suuronen-Goodwin. The Department's investigation consisted of records reviews and interviews with staff and outside sources. It was alleged that the Cloisters of the Valley (facility) staff did not seek timely medical care for Resident one (R1). Based on record review and interviews, R1 complained of stomach pain on 12/12/20 and 12/14/20 and staff scheduled a doctor visit for 12/16/20. When R1 had stomach cramps the following week, nursing staff and former Executive Director visited R1 on the Christmas holiday. R1 complained of stomach cramps on 01/02/21 and the staff gave R1 Tylenol. R1 felt sick on 1/05/21 and facility called 911. Based on records reviews and interviews, there is not substantial evidence to support thCDSS inspection report, May 30, 2025 · control 08-AS-20210326122703

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedUnlawful Eviction. Medications are not locked. Cleaning supplies are accessible to residents. Staff not meeting the needs of a resident. Staff did not treat resident with dignity.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Debbie Correia conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above-mentioned allegations. LPA identified herself to Business Director Susan Dizon, was granted entrance, and met with Resident Service Director (RSD) River Pagala, and discussed the purpose of the visit. The Department’s investigation consisted of facility, resident, and outside source records reviews, a facility tour, and staff interviews. It was alleged that Resident 1 (R1) was served an unlawful eviction, facility staff were not meeting R1’s needs, and facility staff did not treat R1 with dignity. A resident records review revealed R1 moved into the facility on March 19, 2020, with a Primary diagnosis of Invasive Ductal Carcinoma of the right breast with metastasis. Resident records also revealed R1’s did not have a history of aggressive or inappropriate behaviors, was able to leave unassisted, could communicate needs, and followed instructions. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, November 14, 2024 · control 08-AS-20210514092305
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee financially abused resident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Iby Strong conducted an unannounced visit to initiate a complaint investigation on the above-mentioned allegation. LPA identified herself and discussed the purpose of the visit with Business Director Suzie Dizon. On September 26, 2024, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging licensee financially abused Resident 1 (R1). During the investigation, LPA Strong collected pertinent resident records as well as facility documentation and conducted interviews. According to the allegation, R1 is expected to pay roughly $1398 per month out of pocket but is only receiving $1261 monthly from Social Security Income and the remaining balance of $137 per month is accumulating an ongoing balance for R1. Admissions Agreement reviewed revealed that R1 and responsible party agreed to a total monthly expense of $5,450 per month on October 24, 2023. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 2, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240926070542
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not notify responsible party of resident's change in care
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 8/21/24, at about 9:00 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Daniel Pena conducted a complaint investigation visit to the facility. After identifying himself, and explaining the purpose of the visit, LPA was allowed inside the facility. LPA discussed the elements of the complaint with Business Office Director, Suzie Dizon. On 07/31/2024, the Department received this complaint which alleged staff did not notify the responsible party of a resident's change in care. The Department's investigation included facility visits, interviews with residents, staff and outside sources and review of pertinent facility and outside agency records. Information obtained showed that staff transferred Resident 1 (See LIC811 to identify R1) from a private room to a shared room on July 22, 2024. Interviews with staff and an outside source revealed that on May 16, (CONTINUED ON LIC9099D) SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 21, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240731124908
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee did not provide resident or their representative a comprehensive description and fee schedule for services, as per the admission agreement
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Daniel Pena conducted an unannounced visit to initiate a complaint investigation. LPA introduced himself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Tia Suuronen-Goodwin, Executive Director. Upon completion of the visit and investigation, LPA delivered to Director Suuronen-Goodwin, the findings. On June, 4, 2024, CCLD received this complaint. It was alleged the Licensee did not provide Resident 1 (R1) or their representative a comprehensive description and fee schedule for services, as per the admission agreement. The Department’s investigation consisted of an unannounced facility visit, review of facility and resident records, and interviews with facility staff and outside sources. Staff interviews and record reviews provide evidence that the licensee transmitted, via electronic messaging, transaction records which listed the outstanding fees for R1’s care and services. (CONTINUED ON LIC9099-C) UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, June 13, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240604153214
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedMedications are not being administered by appropriately skilled professionals Staff are not following physician's orders Residents are not accorded dignity in relationships with staff Staff are not meeting incontinence needs of residents
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Daniel Pena conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for the aforementioned allegations referenced in this complaint investigation. LPA identified himself and discussed the purpose of the visit with Executive Director, Tia Suuronen-Goodwin. On December 24, 2020, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging resident medications were not administered by skilled professionals, staff did not follow physician medication orders; did not provide incontinence assistance and did not accord residents dignity. During the investigation, LPA conducted a facility tour, obtained and reviewed copies of resident and staff records and facility documentation and interviewed pertinent staff and outside sources. Three of the four employees named in this complaint no longer work for the facility. Efforts were made to interview the former employees but not all were cooperative. Those providing statements denied participating in or witnessing other staCDSS inspection report, March 27, 2024 · control 08-AS-20201224134935
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed-Unlawful eviction -Facility did not safeguard resident’s belongings -Facility did not respond to communications from resident’s authorized representative
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Daniel Pena, conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to initiate a complaint investigation. After introducing and identifying himself, LPA met with Executive Director of Operations, Chad Coleman, and discussed the elements of the complaint. On 03/08/2024, the Department received the following allegations: unlawful eviction of resident, facility did not safeguard a resident’s belongings, and the facility did not respond to communications with a resident’s authorized representative. The Department’s investigation consisted of record reviews, and interviews with facility staff and outside sources. Per facility records, Resident 1 (R1) was admitted to the facility on 12/10/2019. LPA reviewed the Facility Residence and Care Agreement (admission agreement). LPA observed R1’s electronic signature throughout the agreement. LPA also observed a section of the document titled, “Appendix J, Eviction Procedures, 22 CCR 87224(a).” R1’s electronic signature wasCDSS inspection report, March 15, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240308090955

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedNeglect to residents resulting in pressure injuries Neglect to residents resulting in urinary tract infections Neglect to residents resulting in skin conditions Neglect to residents resulting in falls Medications are not being administered according to physician's orders Insufficient staffing to meet residents’ needs Facility did not address rodent and roach infestation
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 11/17/2023, at about 9:35 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Daniel Pena conducted an unannounced visit to conclude a complaint. LPA identified himself, presented his department identification and discussed the allegations and findings with Disha Hall, Executive Director. On 6/2/2022, the Department received a complaint, alleging neglect resulted in resident pressure injuries, urinary tract infections, skin conditions and falls. Additionally, it was alleged the facility staff did not administer medications according to physician orders, had insufficient staffing and did not address pest infestations. The Department’s investigation consisted of facility inspection, record reviews, and interviews with staff and outside sources. According to this complaint, an outside source stated that facility staff did not turn a resident as required, resulting in pressure injuries. Per record reviews, the resident had several diagnoses, including Dementia, COPD and hypertension. Records also noteCDSS inspection report, November 17, 2023 · control 08-AS-20220622093140
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not notify the authorized representative that resident had shingles
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 11/15/2023, at about 8:45 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Daniel Pena conducted an unannounced visit to investigate a complaint. LPA identified himself and discussed the allegation mentioned above with River Pagala, Resident Services Director. On 11/9/2023, the Department received a complaint, alleging the licensee did not inform a resident's authorized representative they (the resident) had shingles. The Department’s investigation consisted of facility inspection, record reviews, and interviews with staff and outside sources. According to the complaint, red spots were observed on Resident 1's (R1) body in August 2023. The facility sent a text message to an authorized representative that the facility physician prescribed a medicated ointment to address a rash on R1's body. The staff did not inform the authorized representative that R1 was diagnosed with shingles. According to the complaint, on October 31, 2023, a facility contract physician verbally advised R1's authorized repreCDSS inspection report, November 15, 2023 · control 08-AS-20231109092101
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not communicate with resident's representative prior to changing primary care physician
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 9/14/2023 at about 9:30 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Daniel Pena, conducted an unannounced complaint visit to the facility. After introducing and identifying himself, LPA met with Executive Director, Disha Hall, and discussed the elements of the complaint and purpose of the visit. During today's visit, LPA met with Director Hall to deliver investigative findings. On August 2, 2023, CCLD received a complaint alleging the facility did not communicate with Resident 1's (R1) representative prior to changing the R1's Primary Care Physician (PCP). It was also alleged; changes were made to R1's medications through a community based physician rather than consulting with R1's provider. The Department's investigation consisted of interviews with staff and outside sources as well as facility inspection and record reviews. It is undisputed, facility staff consulted with a community based provider in reviewing R1’s behavioral changes and medications. Records and interviews revealed, howeCDSS inspection report, September 14, 2023 · control 08-AS-20230802134650
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed-Licensee did not allow visitation -Licensee did not address bed bug infestation
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit to commence a complaint investigation. LPA identified herself and discussed the allegations mentioned above with Business Director, Susan Dizon, Resident Services Director, River Pagala, and Maintenance Director, Isaac Martinez. During today's visit, LPA briefly toured the facility, requested records, and interviewed staff. It was alleged the licensee did not allow visitation. Outside source interviews disclosed a resident's room had bed bugs and resident visitation was not allowed. Staff interviews revealed the residents in the infected room were isolated for fourteen (14) days. Designated staff were assigned to the room with appropriate PPE. Additional staff interviews revealed visitation was not allowed in the resident's room as a precautionary measure. However, the residents were allowed to leave the facility with visitors or visit outside. Further staff interviews revealed the residents were encouragedCDSS inspection report, May 5, 2023 · control 08-AS-20230428140220
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee did not treat resident with dignity
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rebecca Ruiz conducted an unannounced complaint visit to conduct follow up regarding the above mentioned allegation. LPA was greeted by, identified herself to, and explained the purpose of the visit and the basic elements of the complaint with Resident Services Director River Pagala. During today’s visit, LPA observed residents in care and interviewed residents and staff. The Department's investigation consisted of interviews with residents, staff, and outside sources, records review, and a tour of the facility. It was alleged that the Licensee did not treat resident with dignity. Interviews and records review revealed that Resident 1 (R1) had a physician prescribed diet. Interviews revealed that Staff 1 (S1) accused R1 of not complying with the physician prescribed diet and that S1 would cancel R1's outside grocery services. Continued on LIC9099-C page... SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 26, 2023 · control 08-AS-20220518151446
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not answer facility's phone
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marisela Garcia-Centeno conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to open an investigation and deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA was granted entry by Executive Director, Disha Hall to whom LPA discussed the purpose of the visit and the basic elements of the allegation mentioned above with . The Department investigated the above listed complaint allegation. The investigation consisted of interviews with staff and outside sources, and records review, including electronic mail correspondence. On February 21, 2023, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging that facility staff did not answer the facility’s phone. It was specifically alleged that an outside source had difficulties obtaining information from staff during a COVID-19 outbreak on December 27, 2022. According to outside sources they made multiple phone calls between December 28, 2022 and February 21, 2023 when facility staff did not return voice mail messCDSS inspection report, February 27, 2023 · control 08-AS-20230221113754
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewed-Facility staff did not give resident medication as prescribed. -Facility staff did not treat resident with dignity.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Dang Nguyen conducted an unannounced subsequent visit to deliver findings regarding the above prior complaint allegations. LPA was welcomed by and identified himself to Receptionist Rebecca Lane. LPA then met with and discussed the purpose of the visit with Business Office Director Susan Dizon. It was alleged facility staff did not give Resident #1 (R1) medication as prescribed, as illustrated by: a) staff “doubled” the Potassium Chloride and Bumex doses given to R1, leading to their hospitalization, and b) on other occasions, R1 entirely missed (staff did not give) prescribed doses. It was also alleged culinary Staff #1 (S1) did not treat R1 with dignity. CCLD’s investigation involved multiple unannounced facility tours/welfare checks, interviews of R1 and pertinent staff, and review of relevant facility care and administrative records. [CONTINUED ON LIC 9099-C, 1 of 3] SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 25, 2023 · control 08-AS-20210714132834
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewed-Licensee did not ensure a resident received personal care. -Licensee restricted resident’s right to receive visitors.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Dang Nguyen conducted an unannounced subsequent visit to deliver findings regarding the above prior complaint allegations. LPA was welcomed by and identified himself to Receptionist Rebecca Lane. LPA then met with and discussed the purpose of the visit with Business Office Director Susan Dizon. It was alleged licensee did not provide Resident #1 (R1) needed personal care because on multiple occasions R1 was observed with unclean hair or wearing the same clothes over consecutive days. It was also alleged licensee restricted R1's right to receive visitors. CCLD’s investigation involved multiple unannounced facility tours/welfare checks and interviews of pertinent facility staff and outside sources. Relevant care and administrative records, hospice records, outside records, and digital images/videos were also reviewed. [CONTINUED ON LIC 9099-C, 1 of 3] SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 25, 2023 · control 08-AS-20211216150024

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 59 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
3
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
16
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
23
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
34
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
59
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(619) 283-2226
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Cloisters Of The Valley, Llc? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.