Cloisters Of The Valley, Llc is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in San Diego, San Diego County, California — state license #374604267, licensed for 70 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 50 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated June 16, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.
No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.
Since 2021, the state has visited this home 59 times and filed 50 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated June 16, 2026.
The state's published file for this home includes 22 documents with transcribed findings, dated November 12, 2021 to September 10, 2025. 22 of the 22 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (8), “Unfounded” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (12). 22 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.
Summary composed by computer from the 22 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
What the state’s words mean
Jun 16, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Jun 16, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
May 27, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
May 6, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Apr 13, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Apr 8, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Mar 27, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Mar 27, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Mar 24, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Feb 4, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Jan 26, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Jan 20, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Dec 23, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Dec 23, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Nov 10, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Sep 10, 2025Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not issue resident's responsible party a refund
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit regarding the above mentioned allegation. LPA met with Executive Director (ED), Tia Suuronen-Goodwin and Business Office Director (BOD), Susie Dizon. During the investigation, the facility was briefly toured, records reviewed and interviews conducted with staff and outside sources. It was alleged staff did not issue resident's responsible party a refund. It was reported Resident #1 (R1) went to the hospital on 07/02/24 and did not return to the facility. On 07/16/24, R1's belongings were removed from the facility. Outside Source (OS) reported they were made aware of the refunded portion on 10/24/24 with a balance of $2649.64 and unable to obtain the refund. OS also reported the BOD wanted the balance donated back to the facility. OS interview confirmed they did not agree to donate the balance and would like their refund. LPA reviewed an email sent from the BOD to OS indicating the balance amount owed and cothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 10, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250902111313
Aug 7, 2025Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure facility had hot water.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Hannah Rodgers conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation. LPA introduced thelf and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Executive Director Tia Suuronen-Goodwin. On April 3, 2025, it was alleged that staff did not ensure facility had hot water. The Department’s investigation consisted of an unannounced facility visit, records review, and staff, resident, and outside source interviews. According to the allegation, the facility did not have hot water for multiple consecutive days and the staff at the facility were aware that hot water was not working properly at the facility. [Continued on LIC9099-C] Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 7, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250403163513
Aug 7, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not issue a refund to the resident or authorized representative in a timely manner.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Hannah Rodgers conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation. LPA introduced self and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Executive Director Tia Suuronen-Goodwin. On May 5, 2025, it was alleged that staff did not issue a refund to the resident or authorized representative in a timely manner. The Department’s investigation consisted of an unannounced facility visit, records review, and staff, resident, and outside source interviews. According to the allegation, Resident #1 (R1) moved out of the facility on April 8, 2025, but did not receive a refund for the remaining days of the month. On May 16, 2025 R1’s representative received a refund, although on May 27, 2025 it was discovered that R1 received such refund as an accidental charge for May and did not receive a refund for April. [Continued on LIC9099-C] Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 7, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250509152921
Jul 18, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Jun 12, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
May 30, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not seek timely medical care for resident. Staff did not notice change in condition of resident. Staff did not treat resident with dignity. Staff did not ensure resident went to doctor appointments.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Juliana Barfield conducted a subsequent complaint visit via telephone call regarding the above-mentioned allegations. LPA was connected to, identified herself to, and discussed the purpose of the telephone call with Executive Director Tia Suuronen-Goodwin. The Department's investigation consisted of records reviews and interviews with staff and outside sources. It was alleged that the Cloisters of the Valley (facility) staff did not seek timely medical care for Resident one (R1). Based on record review and interviews, R1 complained of stomach pain on 12/12/20 and 12/14/20 and staff scheduled a doctor visit for 12/16/20. When R1 had stomach cramps the following week, nursing staff and former Executive Director visited R1 on the Christmas holiday. R1 complained of stomach cramps on 01/02/21 and the staff gave R1 Tylenol. R1 felt sick on 1/05/21 and facility called 911. Based on records reviews and interviews, there is not substantial evidence to support ththe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 30, 2025 · control 08-AS-20210326122703
May 30, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Nov 15, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Nov 14, 2024Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Unlawful Eviction. Medications are not locked. Cleaning supplies are accessible to residents. Staff not meeting the needs of a resident. Staff did not treat resident with dignity.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Debbie Correia conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above-mentioned allegations. LPA identified herself to Business Director Susan Dizon, was granted entrance, and met with Resident Service Director (RSD) River Pagala, and discussed the purpose of the visit. The Department’s investigation consisted of facility, resident, and outside source records reviews, a facility tour, and staff interviews. It was alleged that Resident 1 (R1) was served an unlawful eviction, facility staff were not meeting R1’s needs, and facility staff did not treat R1 with dignity. A resident records review revealed R1 moved into the facility on March 19, 2020, with a Primary diagnosis of Invasive Ductal Carcinoma of the right breast with metastasis. Resident records also revealed R1’s did not have a history of aggressive or inappropriate behaviors, was able to leave unassisted, could communicate needs, and followed instructions. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 14, 2024 · control 08-AS-20210514092305
Oct 2, 2024Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Licensee financially abused resident
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Iby Strong conducted an unannounced visit to initiate a complaint investigation on the above-mentioned allegation. LPA identified herself and discussed the purpose of the visit with Business Director Suzie Dizon. On September 26, 2024, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging licensee financially abused Resident 1 (R1). During the investigation, LPA Strong collected pertinent resident records as well as facility documentation and conducted interviews. According to the allegation, R1 is expected to pay roughly $1398 per month out of pocket but is only receiving $1261 monthly from Social Security Income and the remaining balance of $137 per month is accumulating an ongoing balance for R1. Admissions Agreement reviewed revealed that R1 and responsible party agreed to a total monthly expense of $5,450 per month on October 24, 2023. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 2, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240926070542
Oct 2, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Aug 21, 2024Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not notify responsible party of resident's change in care
On 8/21/24, at about 9:00 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Daniel Pena conducted a complaint investigation visit to the facility. After identifying himself, and explaining the purpose of the visit, LPA was allowed inside the facility. LPA discussed the elements of the complaint with Business Office Director, Suzie Dizon. On 07/31/2024, the Department received this complaint which alleged staff did not notify the responsible party of a resident's change in care. The Department's investigation included facility visits, interviews with residents, staff and outside sources and review of pertinent facility and outside agency records. Information obtained showed that staff transferred Resident 1 (See LIC811 to identify R1) from a private room to a shared room on July 22, 2024. Interviews with staff and an outside source revealed that on May 16, (CONTINUED ON LIC9099D) Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 21, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240731124908
Jun 26, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Jun 13, 2024Unfounded
Allegation investigated: Licensee did not provide resident or their representative a comprehensive description and fee schedule for services, as per the admission agreement
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Daniel Pena conducted an unannounced visit to initiate a complaint investigation. LPA introduced himself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Tia Suuronen-Goodwin, Executive Director. Upon completion of the visit and investigation, LPA delivered to Director Suuronen-Goodwin, the findings. On June, 4, 2024, CCLD received this complaint. It was alleged the Licensee did not provide Resident 1 (R1) or their representative a comprehensive description and fee schedule for services, as per the admission agreement. The Department’s investigation consisted of an unannounced facility visit, review of facility and resident records, and interviews with facility staff and outside sources. Staff interviews and record reviews provide evidence that the licensee transmitted, via electronic messaging, transaction records which listed the outstanding fees for R1’s care and services. (CONTINUED ON LIC9099-C) Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 13, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240604153214
Mar 27, 2024Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Medications are not being administered by appropriately skilled professionals Staff are not following physician's orders Residents are not accorded dignity in relationships with staff Staff are not meeting incontinence needs of residents
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Daniel Pena conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for the aforementioned allegations referenced in this complaint investigation. LPA identified himself and discussed the purpose of the visit with Executive Director, Tia Suuronen-Goodwin. On December 24, 2020, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging resident medications were not administered by skilled professionals, staff did not follow physician medication orders; did not provide incontinence assistance and did not accord residents dignity. During the investigation, LPA conducted a facility tour, obtained and reviewed copies of resident and staff records and facility documentation and interviewed pertinent staff and outside sources. Three of the four employees named in this complaint no longer work for the facility. Efforts were made to interview the former employees but not all were cooperative. Those providing statements denied participating in or witnessing other stathe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 27, 2024 · control 08-AS-20201224134935
Mar 15, 2024Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: -Unlawful eviction -Facility did not safeguard resident’s belongings -Facility did not respond to communications from resident’s authorized representative
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Daniel Pena, conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to initiate a complaint investigation. After introducing and identifying himself, LPA met with Executive Director of Operations, Chad Coleman, and discussed the elements of the complaint. On 03/08/2024, the Department received the following allegations: unlawful eviction of resident, facility did not safeguard a resident’s belongings, and the facility did not respond to communications with a resident’s authorized representative. The Department’s investigation consisted of record reviews, and interviews with facility staff and outside sources. Per facility records, Resident 1 (R1) was admitted to the facility on 12/10/2019. LPA reviewed the Facility Residence and Care Agreement (admission agreement). LPA observed R1’s electronic signature throughout the agreement. LPA also observed a section of the document titled, “Appendix J, Eviction Procedures, 22 CCR 87224(a).” R1’s electronic signature wasthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 15, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240308090955
Nov 27, 2023Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Nov 17, 2023Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Neglect to residents resulting in pressure injuries Neglect to residents resulting in urinary tract infections Neglect to residents resulting in skin conditions Neglect to residents resulting in falls Medications are not being administered according to physician's orders Insufficient staffing to meet residents’ needs Facility did not address rodent and roach infestation
On 11/17/2023, at about 9:35 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Daniel Pena conducted an unannounced visit to conclude a complaint. LPA identified himself, presented his department identification and discussed the allegations and findings with Disha Hall, Executive Director. On 6/2/2022, the Department received a complaint, alleging neglect resulted in resident pressure injuries, urinary tract infections, skin conditions and falls. Additionally, it was alleged the facility staff did not administer medications according to physician orders, had insufficient staffing and did not address pest infestations. The Department’s investigation consisted of facility inspection, record reviews, and interviews with staff and outside sources. According to this complaint, an outside source stated that facility staff did not turn a resident as required, resulting in pressure injuries. Per record reviews, the resident had several diagnoses, including Dementia, COPD and hypertension. Records also notethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 17, 2023 · control 08-AS-20220622093140
Nov 15, 2023Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not notify the authorized representative that resident had shingles
On 11/15/2023, at about 8:45 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Daniel Pena conducted an unannounced visit to investigate a complaint. LPA identified himself and discussed the allegation mentioned above with River Pagala, Resident Services Director. On 11/9/2023, the Department received a complaint, alleging the licensee did not inform a resident's authorized representative they (the resident) had shingles. The Department’s investigation consisted of facility inspection, record reviews, and interviews with staff and outside sources. According to the complaint, red spots were observed on Resident 1's (R1) body in August 2023. The facility sent a text message to an authorized representative that the facility physician prescribed a medicated ointment to address a rash on R1's body. The staff did not inform the authorized representative that R1 was diagnosed with shingles. According to the complaint, on October 31, 2023, a facility contract physician verbally advised R1's authorized reprethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 15, 2023 · control 08-AS-20231109092101
Oct 27, 2023Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Sep 14, 2023Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not communicate with resident's representative prior to changing primary care physician
On 9/14/2023 at about 9:30 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Daniel Pena, conducted an unannounced complaint visit to the facility. After introducing and identifying himself, LPA met with Executive Director, Disha Hall, and discussed the elements of the complaint and purpose of the visit. During today's visit, LPA met with Director Hall to deliver investigative findings. On August 2, 2023, CCLD received a complaint alleging the facility did not communicate with Resident 1's (R1) representative prior to changing the R1's Primary Care Physician (PCP). It was also alleged; changes were made to R1's medications through a community based physician rather than consulting with R1's provider. The Department's investigation consisted of interviews with staff and outside sources as well as facility inspection and record reviews. It is undisputed, facility staff consulted with a community based provider in reviewing R1’s behavioral changes and medications. Records and interviews revealed, howethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 14, 2023 · control 08-AS-20230802134650
Year-by-year trend
Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.
Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →
No Google listing is on file for this home. When one exists, its rating, review themes, and hours appear here — attributed to Google, never blended with the state record, and never part of how we rank homes.
This home hasn’t added its own details yet. When the operator claims this page, their photos, tour video, activities, languages, and staffing answers appear here — always labeled as theirs, never blended with the state record. Operators: claim your home, free →
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Is Cloisters Of The Valley, Llc licensed?
Yes — Cloisters Of The Valley, Llc is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in San Diego (San Diego County): California license #374604267, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 70 residents. State records list 50 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated June 16, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.
Can Cloisters Of The Valley, Llc care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?
From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.
The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Cloisters Of The Valley, Llc with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.
From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.
What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 70 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 9 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. BEDRIIDEN NOT ALLOWED IN ROOMS 1, 2, 3, 22, AND 23. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 35 RESIDENTS.
How much does Cloisters Of The Valley, Llc cost?
California's public licensing record does not include Cloisters Of The Valley, Llc's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Diego County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.
Does Cloisters Of The Valley, Llc accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?
Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Cloisters Of The Valley, Llc through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.
Medi-Cal / ALW homes in San Diego County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →
64 of 70 beds occupied (91%) when the state visited on September 10, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.
What do state inspections show for Cloisters Of The Valley, Llc?
Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.
The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 59 state visits and 50 dated documents since 2021 for Cloisters Of The Valley, Llc; 22 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated September 10, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated”. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.
Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.
2025
2024
2023
Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.
What the state has logged
California has logged 59 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.
You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.
(619) 283-2226Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.
Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →
See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →
This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →
Do you run Cloisters Of The Valley, Llc? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.