Small home · Licensed for 6 · San Diego
Pine Tree Home
4603 Rainier Avenue, San Diego, CA 92120Licensed since 2008
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 6 residents
- Hospiceup to 2 residents
- Bedriddenup to 2 residents
Not on file: dementia approval.
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
FACILITY SERVES SIX (6) NON-AMBULATORY ELDERLY RESIDENTS; AGE 60 AND ABOVE. TWO (2) OF WHOM MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. FACILITY APPROVED FOR TWO (2) HOSPICE RESIDENTS.
985 - RCFE / HOSPICE
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 2 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Pine Tree Home: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight, help with medicines and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
Covelight estimate
$5,300a month to start
Likely $4,350–$6,500
From 9 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$5,300likely a month
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$5,300likely $4,350–$6,500
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $4,350–$6,650
- $5,300
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $5,100–$9,850
- $7,800
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes9 nearby homes publish starting rates of $2,000 to $7,500
9 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,450–$6,000.
- Thrive Elder CareSan Diego · 0.3 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Twain Residential CareSan Diego · 0.3 mi · Mid-size home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Comfort & Joy LivingSan Diego · 1.3 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Del Cerro Elder CareSan Diego · 1.5 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Emerald Guest HomeSan Diego · 2.3 mi · Small home$2,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Tierrasanta Vernanel Care HomeSan Diego · 2.4 mi · Small home$3,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Calle De VidaSan Diego · 2.5 mi · Small home$7,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Acorn Oaks Manor IIISan Diego · 2.7 mi · Small home$5,800Listed on its own website · assisted living · seen October 5, 2026
- Casa Del CieloSan Diego · 2.9 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.
The best way to see it is a visit.
Request a tourWhere it is
4603 Rainier Avenue, San Diego, CA 92120Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- Kaiser Foundation Hospital - ZionHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list0.1 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #374602620 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 5 of 8 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 1 “Unsubstantiated”.
20261 state visit · 1 document
May 27, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Rodgers conducted an unannounced, required Annual Inspection. The facility file and personnel report was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was welcomed by, identified themselves to Administrator Chona Simsuango.. The facility's license shows a capacity of six (6) non-ambulatory residents, two (2) of which may be bedridden. The facility is additionally approved for two (2) hospice residents. LPA and Administrator Simsuango toured the interior and exterior of the facility and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Client bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows, screens, toilets, and showers were in working order. Hot water temperature at taps accessible to clients were all compliant. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and client activities. Kitchen area was clean and organized. The facility contained at least two (2) days of perishable food, and at least seven (7) days non-perishable food, all safely stored. Cooking, dining equipment, and utensils were present. Knives were locked and inaccessible to residents. Toxic chemicals or poisons were accessible to clients. Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. No pools or bodies of water exist on the premises. Carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all in working order. Fire extinguishers were serviced within the last 12 months. First aid kit was complete and readily accessible. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. LPA reviewed facility records. The files reviewed by LPA contained required documents. Confidential records were stored in locked areas. No deficiencies were cited during the inspection. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Simsuango to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058) were provided. Their signature below confirms receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 27, 2026
20252 state visits · 2 documents
May 20, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arian Golbakhsh conducted an unannounced, required Annual Inspection. The facility file and personnel report was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was welcomed by, identified themselves to, and discussed the purpose of the visit to Caregivers Gloria Pascua, Loida Sanga, and Rowena Estacio. Administrator Chona Simsuango arrived later in the visit. The facility's license shows a capacity of six (6) non-ambulatory residents, two (2) of which may be bedridden. The facility is additionally approved for two (2) hospice residents. During today’s inspection there were five (5) residents in care, but four (4) were out at program. LPA, Caregiver Pascua, and Administrator Simsuango toured the interior and exterior of the facility and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Client bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows, screens, toilets, and showers were in working order. Hot water temperature at taps accessible to clients were all compliant: Common resident bathroom sink read at 106F. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present, as well as Personal Protective Equipment. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and client activities. Kitchen area was clean and organized. The facility contained at least two (2) days of perishable food, and at least seven (7) days non-perishable food, all safely stored. Cooking, dining equipment, and utensils were present. Knives were locked and inaccessible to residents. [Continued on LIC 809-C] [Continued from LIC 809] No toxic chemicals or poisons were accessible to clients. Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. No pools or bodies of water exist on the premises. Per Administrator Simsuango, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all in working order. Fire extinguishers were serviced within the last 12 months. First aid kit was complete and readily accessible. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. LPA interviewed two (2) staff and zero (0) clients, and interviews did not reveal any licensing or regulatory concerns. LPA reviewed facility records. The files reviewed by LPA contained required documents. Confidential records were stored in locked areas. No deficiencies were cited during the inspection. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Simsuango to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058) were provided. Their signature below confirms receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 20, 2025
Apr 22, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff yells at resident Staff hits resident Staff interacts with residents in an inappropriate manner Staff threatens resident
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Rodgers made an unannounced visit to open an investigation on the above-mentioned allegation. LPA identified herself and disclosed the purpose of her visit with Licensee/Administrator Chona Simsuangco On February 4th 2025 , Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging Staff 1 (S1) yells, hits, and acts inappropriately to clients and that S1 threatens Client #4(C4). During the investigation, LPA Rodgers made observations, conducted interviews, reviewed facility records, and interviewed outside sources. Regarding the allegation staff yells, hits and interacts with residents inappropriately. More specifically, it was reported staff #1(S1) yells at Client #1(C1) to move faster when walking; S1 flicks Client#3(C3) in the mouth; and S1 gives clients in the facility the middle finger when they are not looking. (continued on LIC 9099) Unsubstantiated Continued form 9099) Physician's report dated (8/20/2024) reveals C1 has history of hearing loss. C1 interview denies feeling uncomfortable when any staff asks them to hurry to the waiting transportation outside. Interviews with Client #2(C2) verify that C1 is hard of hearing and staff does talk loudly to C1. Interviews with staff confirm they must talk in a loud voice to C1 because they are hard of hearing. LPA observations reveal C3 does have mouth open at times and does drool. C3 is nonverbal, and LPA was unable to interview; however, interviews with C1 and C2 reveal they have never witnessed any staff flick C3 in the mouth. Staff and administrators deny ever witnessing any staff member flicking or inappropriately touching C3 in the mouth area. C1 and C2 deny ever witnessing staff giving anyone the middle finger. They further explain that the staff are nice and helpful. Staff and administrators also deny ever witnessing any staff member giving clients the middle finger. Outside source interviews reveal that no clients in the home have reported to them any accounts of staff not interacting appropriately with clients. Regarding the allegation that the staff threaten the resident. More specifically, S1 threatens to take Client #4(C4) cell phone and gifted earrings away if C4 moves out. The interview with the administrator indicates C4 does not own the cell phone; S1 owns the cell phone. Interviews with the administrator further explained that the earrings were a gift to C4. S1 denies making threats but does explain that the cell phone is theirs. Outside interviews reveal C4 does have a history of false accusations and attention-seeking behavior. Interviews with C1 and C2 reveal they have never witnessed threatening words to C4 by any staff member. Due to lack of corroborating evidence, the finding regarding the above allegations were established to be unsubstantiated. This finding means there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee/Administrator Simsuangco and a copy of this report along with Licensee Rights (LIC 9058 01/16) was provided to Licensee/Administrator Simsuangco. Signature on the for confirms receipt the reports were received.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 22, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250204113009
20242 state visits · 2 documents
May 21, 2024Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Rodgers conducted an unannounced case management visit to follow up on an incident reported to Community Care Licensing. LPA met with House manager Gloria Pascua, and discussed the purpose of the visit. Community Care Licensing received an incident report on April 26, 2024, in which it was reported that Resident #1 (R1) was pronounced deceased on April 26,2024 while in the hospital. R1 had a documented history of illness before they passed away. During today's visit, LPA collected pertinent resident records and conducted a health and safety check of the residents in care. No deficiencies were cited during today’s visit. House manager Gloria Pascua, Licensee was provided a copy of this report, appeal rights (LIC9058 03/22), the LIC 811.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 21, 2024
Mar 12, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Amy Rodgers conducted an unannounced Required Annual Inspection to ensure substantial compliance with Title 22 regulations. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was welcomed by, identified herself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with House Manager Gloria Pascua. Licensee Chona Simsuangco later joined the visit. According to the facility’s license, the facility has a maximum capacity of six (6), all of whom can be non-ambulatory. This facility does not feature a secured perimeter or delayed egress doors. LPA, accompanied by licensee’s staff, toured the interior and exterior of the facility, and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Client bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Toilets, and showers were in working order. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and client activities. The facility’s ambient internal temperature was with regulation range. Hot water temperature at taps accessible to clients were all compliant. Refrigerator and Freezer temperature were complaint. There was at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days non-perishable food present, all safely stored. Cooking/dining equipment and utensils were present and in good repair. There were no sharp objects, toxic chemicals/poisons, fireplaces, or open-faced heaters accessible to clients. Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. [CONTINUED ON LIC 809-C] [CONTINUED FROM LIC 809] There is a not a pool on water feature on the premises. Per the licensee's staff, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Smoke alarms, carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all working. First aid kit was complete and readily accessible. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. LPA observed that residents were being treated with dignity by staff, and there were sufficient staff on duty to meet resident’s needs. LPA interviewed multiple staff and clients. LPA reviewed multiple staff and client records/files. The interviews did not raise any significant licensing concerns. The reviewed files contained required documents. Confidential records were stored in locked areas. Licensee's staff also presented proof of current/active business liability insurance. No deficiencies were observed or cited during today's annual inspection. An exit interview was conducted with, Licensee Chona Simsuangco to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided during the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 12, 2024
Earlier years2022 to 2023 · 3 documents
20231 state visit · 1 document
Oct 17, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Domingo conducted an unannounced Required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was welcomed by, identified herself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Gloria Pascua. According to the facility’s license, the facility has a maximum capacity of six (6) clients, all of whom must be ambulatory. During today’s inspection, there were a total of six (6) clients in care, and per medical records, all were ambulatory. This facility does not feature a secured perimeter or delayed egress doors. LPA, accompanied by licensee’s staff, toured the interior and exterior of the facility, and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Client bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows and screens, toilets, and showers were in working order. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present, as well as Personal Protective Equipment. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and client activities. The facility’s ambient internal temperature was 69 F. Hot water temperature at taps accessible to clients were all compliant: Kitchen sink was 103 F, Bathroom #1 sink was 103 F, and Bathroom #2 sink was 103 F. Refrigerator temperature was 40 F and freezer temperature was 0 F. There was at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days non-perishable food present, all safely stored. Cooking/dining equipment and utensils were present. There were no sharp objects, toxic chemicals/poisons, fireplaces, or open-faced heaters accessible to clients. Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. [CONTINUED ON LIC 809C] [CONTINUED FROM LIC 809] No pools or bodies of water were observed on the premises. Per the licensee's staff, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Smoke alarms, carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all working. Fire extinguisher(s) were serviced within the last 12 months. First aid kit(s) were complete and readily accessible. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. LPAs interviewed multiple staff and clients. LPA reviewed multiple staff and client records/files. The interviews did not raise any significant licensing concerns. The reviewed files contained required documents. Confidential records were stored in locked areas. Licensee's staff also presented proof of current/active business liability insurance and surety bond. No deficiencies were observed or cited during today's annual inspection. An exit interview was conducted with House Manager Gloria Pascua, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided during the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 17, 2023
20222 state visits · 2 documents
Jul 14, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Neglect to resident resulting in a pressure injury. Failure to seek medical attention. Facility retained a resident with a prohibited health condition.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Debbie Correia conducted an unannounced visit to deliver investigative findings on the above listed complaint allegations. LPA Correia met with Caregiver Gloria Pascua to whom was explained the purpose for the visit. The Department’s investigation consisted of staff and outside source interviews, and resident and medical record reviews. It was alleged that Resident (R1) sustained a pressure injury due to staff neglect. An interview with facility staff and a resident record review revealed R1 was admitted to the facility on July 23, 2019. At the time of admission, R1 was diagnosed with Mild Intellectual Disabilities (MID), Dementia, Hyperlipemia, Hypertension, Cerebral Palsy, was legally blind, and had cellulitis on their right lower limb. R1 required full assistance with ADL’s. Unsubstantiated An interview conducted on September 29, 2020 with facility Staff1 (S1) revealed R1 received home health services three (3) days a week. S1 also revealed on August 3, 2020 they observed a small blister on R1’s lower back. S1 notified the facility Administrator (S2) on that same day. Interviews with S1 and S2 revealed on August 4, 2020 R1’s primary doctor and home health agency were notified about the pressure injury. An outside source record review corroborated that on August 4, 2020 facility staff notified R1’s home health agency and R1 was seen by a nurse on that same day. Interviews with facility staff and an outside source record review also revealed on, August 4, 2020, R1’s attending nurse instructed facility staff how to care for R1’s wound. An interview with S1 revealed on August 7, 2020 R1’s injury appeared to have worsened and S1 facilitated having R1 transported to the emergency room (ER) of a hospital. A review of medical records corroborates R1 was transported to the ER on August 7, 2020. It was also alleged facility staff failed to seek medical attention for R1, and the facility retained R1 with a restricted health condition. An interview with S2 revealed toward the third week of July 2020 R1 began to have trouble swallowing, and R1 started to refuse to eat their pureed food. R1 also developed a pressure injury while at the facility. Staff and outside source interviews, as well as resident and medical record reviews revealed at the time of the alleged violations R1 was under the care of a home health service and was being seen by medical professionals three times a week. Both the home health agency and R1’s primary doctor were informed and aware of R1’s prognosis. Due to lack of corroborating evidence, the finding regarding the above allegations were established to be unsubstantiated. This finding means there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred. An exit interview was conducted with Caregiver Pascua and a copy of this report along with Licensee Rights (LIC 9058 01/16) was provided to Caregiver Pascua. Signature on the for confirms receipt the reports were received.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 14, 2022 · control 08-AS-20200811115142
May 27, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Liliana Silveira conducted an unannounced annual required licensing inspection. LPA was granted entry after identifying herself and disclosing the purpose of the visit to Administrator Leonardo Simsuangco. An overall tour of the facility was conducted inside and out. The inspection included, but was not limited to, verifying compliance with statutes, regulations and other written requirements that are most relevant to protecting the health of residents in care and staff, including in the area of infection control practices. LPA reviewed the facility’s Plan for Epidemic Outbreak Specific to COVID-19 Mitigation Plan Report (LIC 808) with Leonardo including the following sections: Person in Care, Staff, Visitors, Facilities without COVID-19, Residents, Facility Plans for Infection Control and Physical Distancing. LPA assessed the strategies that the facility is employing for the prevention, containment and mitigation of COVID-19, implementation of infection control guidance, staff retention and essential health and safety. LPA observed one central entry point for universal entry screening; routine symptom screening initiated at entry for staff, residents and visitors; a sign-in policy enacted for all visitors; signs were provided to be posted at facility entrance with the facility’s visitor policy and signs throughout the facility to promote hand hygiene, cough/sneeze etiquette and physical distancing; face coverings worn by staff and encouraged for residents; hand sanitizer/hand washing stations readily available; a designated visitation area; emergency agencies’ contact information posted in a location visible to staff and residents; and an adequate supply of PPE. The facility is in compliance with and has implemented infection control practices as outlined in its LIC 808. Based on today’s inspection, no deficiencies were observed. An exit interview was conducted with Leonardo Simsuangco. A copy of this report, along with the Licensee Rights (9058 01/16) were printed and provided to the Administrator at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 27, 2022
5 of 6 beds were occupied at the April 22, 2025 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Pine Tree Home, LLC, licensed since 2008.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2008, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 7
- Total complaints
- 1
- Substantiated allegations
- 0
- Type A citations
- 0
- Type B citations
- 0
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2008, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 0 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 0 | 0 |
| Substantiated allegations | 0 | 0 |
| Total complaints | 1 | 0 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Pine Tree Home
Is Pine Tree Home licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Pine Tree Home licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Pine Tree Home been cited?
0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2008, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 7 state visits over the same years.
Is Pine Tree Home still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.
What does Pine Tree Home cost?
$5,300 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,350–$6,500. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 51 other homes of a similar licensed size in San Diego that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $6,000 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 51 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Pine Tree Home take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Pine Tree Home, LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. See the homes licensed to Pine Tree Home LLC — at least 2 on the state roster.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Zion is 0.1 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Pine Tree Home keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 2 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Pine Tree Home license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “PINE TREE HOME, LLC”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #374602620. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to Pine Tree Home, LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2008, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 7 state inspection visits since 2008, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2008, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 7 state visits in that period.
- 1 complaint and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2008, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is May 27, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in San Diego County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Starting rate
$4,000 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$5,550 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$6,000 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,100 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,150–$6,250On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$6,000 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$4,500 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore San Diego County