Premium Care Services is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in San Diego, San Diego County, California — state license #374604138, with a licensed capacity of 6, listed as closed, licensee initiated in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 11 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated July 8, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

14 homes in view

Premium Care Services

The state record lists this licence as “Closed, Licensee Initiated”. A closed licence cannot admit residents. We keep closed licences published because “is this place licensed?” deserves an honest answer.

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 6 residents · San Diego, CA · San Diego County
Closed in state recordWheelchairHospiceBedriddenMemory care not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days · we confirm by phone before any referral
License #374604138, held since 2019 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
8243 Hydra Ln · San Diego, San Diego County
Phone
(858) 433-7319
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 4 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 5 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 1 resident

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. SIX (6) AMBULATORY, OF WHICH FOUR (4) MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY AND ONE (1) MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. BEDRIDDEN RESIDENT CAN BE IN ROOM 1,2,OR 4. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR FIVE (5).State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 13 times and filed 11 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated July 8, 2026.

Most recent state visit
July 8, 2026
Occupancy at the December 10, 2025 visit
4 of 6 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 4 documents with transcribed findings, dated July 3, 2024 to December 10, 2025. 4 of the 4 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 4 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 4 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 9 of 11 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20261 state visit · 1 document
Jul 8, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20253 state visits · 6 documents
Dec 10, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure that resident was provided postural support according to their daily living needs Staff did not provide adequate food service for residents Staff did not provide residents comfortable living accomodations Staff did not maintain a comfortable temperature in the facility for residents Staff did not keep the facility free of cockroaches

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit to commence a complaint investigation. LPA identified herself and discussed the allegations mentioned above with Staff, Nelson Quebrel. LPA spoke with Administrator, Sheikh Hafiz via telephone, while at the facility. During the investigation, the facility was toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff and residents. It was alleged staff did not ensure Resident #1 (R1) was provided postural support according to their daily living needs and staff did not provide R1 comfortable living accommodations. It was reported R1 did not have bed rails on their bed and was a known fall risk and had an undersized mattress. R1 was not interviewed, as they passed away. The administrator explained that the hospice agency had the hospital bed delivered with a hospital mattress, there were no bed rails or orders. The administrator explained that R1’s physician and/or hospice agency did not order bed rails forthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 10, 2025 · control 08-AS-20251204232010
Aug 19, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not treat resident with dignity

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit to conclude the complaint investigation regarding the above mentioned allegations. LPA was greeted and allowed entry into the facility by Staff, Roser Loja. The Administrator, Sheik Hafiz arrived during the visit. During the investigation, the facility was toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff, residents, and outside sources. It was alleged staff did not treat resident with dignity. It was reported Staff #1 (S1) called Resident #1 (R1) bad names and goosed R1’s butt. It was explained S1 poked R1 between the buttocks. Outside source interviews revealed R1 used to goose people in their past and thought it was funny. S1 explained R1 would goose S1, so S1 admitted they did it back to R1, as a friendly gesture and they would both laugh. S1 denied calling R1 names. In addition, S1 was using rubber bands to tie the doorknobs together to hold the door shut. S1 was sleeping in the hallway outthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 19, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250127114918
Aug 19, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 19, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 15, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are sleeping in residents' room/living room

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit regarding the above mentioned allegation. LPA was greeted and allowed entry into the facility by staff, Khymberlie Talledo. LPA discussed the allegation with Licensee, Sheikh Hafiz via telephone, while at the facility. During the investigation, the facility was toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff, residents, and outside sources. It was alleged staff are sleeping in residents’ room/living room. It was reported staff use roll away bed and sleep in the living room, as well as on the floor in resident rooms. Resident interviews confirmed staff are sleeping in the living room but not the resident rooms. Staff confirmed they sleep in the living room, as there are no staff rooms available. Licensee confirmed staff are sleeping in the common area/living room, but not resident rooms. The LIC 999 Facility Sketch was reviewed and identified the living room as the intended purpose, not sleepinthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 15, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250410160604
Apr 15, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20242 state visits · 2 documents
Aug 23, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 3, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not ensure a comfortable temperature was maintained for residents at all times

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit to commence a complaint investigation. LPA identified herself and discussed the allegation mentioned above with Staff, Roser Loja. During today's visit, LPA briefly toured the facility, interviewed staff and residents. It was alleged the licensee did not ensure a comfortable temperature was maintained for residents at all times. It was reported the facility's temperature was 88 degrees F. on 06/25/24. An online review of AccuWeather indicated the weather on 06/25/24 was 83 degrees F. in the Mira Mesa area. Outside source interviews revealed a resident was hot and sweating in their bed due to the hot temperature of 88 degrees F. on 06/25/24. Staff and resident interviews confirmed the resident that was in bed sweating has a shared room and the resident's roommate turned off the fan, due to feeling cold. Even though the facility’s temperature reached 88 degrees F. not all residents were hot, due to different bthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 3, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240627094003
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 0
Type B citations2typical 0
Substantiated complaints2typical 0
Total complaints4typical 0
State visits on file13typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2019.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20261102025362202422020221102021110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$4,000$6,500 /mo
our estimate — San Diego County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,000 · statewide low$8,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one.
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →

Is Premium Care Services licensed?

No — not currently. The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists Premium Care Services in San Diego (San Diego County), California license #374604138, as “Closed, Licensee Initiated, formerly licensed for 6 residents. State records list 11 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated July 8, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Premium Care Services care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Premium Care Services with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. SIX (6) AMBULATORY, OF WHICH FOUR (4) MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY AND ONE (1) MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. BEDRIDDEN RESIDENT CAN BE IN ROOM 1,2,OR 4. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR FIVE (5).

How much does Premium Care Services cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Premium Care Services's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Diego County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Premium Care Services accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Premium Care Services is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

4 of 6 beds occupied (67%) when the state visited on December 10, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Premium Care Services?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 13 state visits and 11 dated documents since 2021 for Premium Care Services; 4 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated December 10, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

4 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure that resident was provided postural support according to their daily living needs Staff did not provide adequate food service for residents Staff did not provide residents comfortable living accomodations Staff did not maintain a comfortable temperature in the facility for residents Staff did not keep the facility free of cockroaches
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit to commence a complaint investigation. LPA identified herself and discussed the allegations mentioned above with Staff, Nelson Quebrel. LPA spoke with Administrator, Sheikh Hafiz via telephone, while at the facility. During the investigation, the facility was toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff and residents. It was alleged staff did not ensure Resident #1 (R1) was provided postural support according to their daily living needs and staff did not provide R1 comfortable living accommodations. It was reported R1 did not have bed rails on their bed and was a known fall risk and had an undersized mattress. R1 was not interviewed, as they passed away. The administrator explained that the hospice agency had the hospital bed delivered with a hospital mattress, there were no bed rails or orders. The administrator explained that R1’s physician and/or hospice agency did not order bed rails forCDSS inspection report, December 10, 2025 · control 08-AS-20251204232010
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not treat resident with dignity
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit to conclude the complaint investigation regarding the above mentioned allegations. LPA was greeted and allowed entry into the facility by Staff, Roser Loja. The Administrator, Sheik Hafiz arrived during the visit. During the investigation, the facility was toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff, residents, and outside sources. It was alleged staff did not treat resident with dignity. It was reported Staff #1 (S1) called Resident #1 (R1) bad names and goosed R1’s butt. It was explained S1 poked R1 between the buttocks. Outside source interviews revealed R1 used to goose people in their past and thought it was funny. S1 explained R1 would goose S1, so S1 admitted they did it back to R1, as a friendly gesture and they would both laugh. S1 denied calling R1 names. In addition, S1 was using rubber bands to tie the doorknobs together to hold the door shut. S1 was sleeping in the hallway outCDSS inspection report, August 19, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250127114918
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are sleeping in residents' room/living room
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit regarding the above mentioned allegation. LPA was greeted and allowed entry into the facility by staff, Khymberlie Talledo. LPA discussed the allegation with Licensee, Sheikh Hafiz via telephone, while at the facility. During the investigation, the facility was toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff, residents, and outside sources. It was alleged staff are sleeping in residents’ room/living room. It was reported staff use roll away bed and sleep in the living room, as well as on the floor in resident rooms. Resident interviews confirmed staff are sleeping in the living room but not the resident rooms. Staff confirmed they sleep in the living room, as there are no staff rooms available. Licensee confirmed staff are sleeping in the common area/living room, but not resident rooms. The LIC 999 Facility Sketch was reviewed and identified the living room as the intended purpose, not sleepinCDSS inspection report, April 15, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250410160604

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee did not ensure a comfortable temperature was maintained for residents at all times
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit to commence a complaint investigation. LPA identified herself and discussed the allegation mentioned above with Staff, Roser Loja. During today's visit, LPA briefly toured the facility, interviewed staff and residents. It was alleged the licensee did not ensure a comfortable temperature was maintained for residents at all times. It was reported the facility's temperature was 88 degrees F. on 06/25/24. An online review of AccuWeather indicated the weather on 06/25/24 was 83 degrees F. in the Mira Mesa area. Outside source interviews revealed a resident was hot and sweating in their bed due to the hot temperature of 88 degrees F. on 06/25/24. Staff and resident interviews confirmed the resident that was in bed sweating has a shared room and the resident's roommate turned off the fan, due to feeling cold. Even though the facility’s temperature reached 88 degrees F. not all residents were hot, due to different bCDSS inspection report, July 3, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240627094003

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 13 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
2
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
2
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
4
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
13
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(858) 433-7319
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Premium Care Services? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.