Nir Community Ii

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted a telephone visit to conclude the complaint investigation regarding the above mentioned allegations. LPA discussed the investigation with Licensee, Faria Huq. During the investigation, the facility was briefly toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff, residents, and outside sources. It was alleged that medication was not given as prescribed for Resident #1 (R1). It was reported that R1 went to the hospital after a fall. At the Emergency Room (ER), the physician documented "Poisoning by Benzodiazepine, Undetermined intent". The toxicology report showed negative for benzodiazepine, as documented by the physician. R1 had a prescribed PRN for medication, Lorazepam 1mg, a benzodiazepine. However, the benzodiazepine should have still shown up on the toxicology report if the facility staff administered too much. The facility did not have documentation of administering the PRN, Lorazepam. R1’s interview revealed thRead the full finding— CDSS inspection report, June 2, 2026 · control 08-AS-20220112110659

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit to conclude the complaint investigation regarding the above mentioned allegations. LPA met with Staff, Bobby Corpuz. During the investigation, the facility was toured, records reviewed and interviews conducted with staff, residents, and outside sources. It was alleged that staff leave resident in a soiled diaper for extended periods. The administrator explained that staff do their last rounds around 9pm. They change residents briefs and then staff head to bed. If staff wake up to use the bathroom themselves, they check on the residents and change them if needed. Staff check on the residents again at 5am. Therefore, if staff do not wake up at night to check on residents, the residents will be in the same briefs from 9pm to 5am. R1’s Physician’s Report dated 10/21/22 indicated R1 had a Major Neurocognitive Disorder and was incontinent of bowel/bladder, it did not indicate a medical need for awake staff. ResidRead the full finding— CDSS inspection report, February 27, 2026 · control 08-AS-20230301132028

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit to conclude a complaint investigation. LPA identified herself and discussed the allegation mentioned above with Staff, Norman Suyat. During the investigation, the facility was briefly toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff. It was alleged staff did not meet resident's incontinence care need. It was reported Resident #1 (R1) was instructed by the facility staff to use the restroom in their brief, when R1 asked to use the restroom. R1’s Physician’s Report dated 09/04/24 indicated R1 was non-ambulatory, had a diagnosis of a Major Neurocognitive Disorder, incontinent of bladder/bowel, assistance with feeding, and was receiving hospice services. R1’s Preplacement Appraisal dated 09/30/24 reflected R1 required total care assistance to include toileting and hoyer lift for transfers. Prior to moving into the facility, R1 had two (2) hip surgeries due to falls. R1 was residing at the facility rRead the full finding— CDSS inspection report, November 19, 2024 · control 08-AS-20241101102328

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit to commence a complaint investigation. LPA identified herself and discussed the allegation mentioned above with Staff, Zenia Valdehueza. During today's visit, LPA briefly toured the facility, and interviewed staff and residents. It was alleged the licensee did not provide a comfortable temperature for residents. It was reported the facility has fans but it's still too hot for the residents. Resident interviews confirmed the fans help but some days are too hot, even with the fans. Some residents reported it was difficult to sleep due to the uncomfortable temperature. Staff interviews revealed they feel comfortable with the fans. LPA observed ten (10) fans in use but it was only comfortable in some areas of the facility. Two (2) of the resident's room temperature was uncomfortable and the residents agreed it was too hot. The local news reported San Diego is experiencing heat waves. The administrator explainedRead the full finding— CDSS inspection report, July 11, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240702150209

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted a complaint investigation regarding the above mentioned allegations. LPA was greeted and allowed entry into the facility by Staff, Norman Suyat and discussed the allegations. LPA discussed allegations with Administrator, Faria Huq via telephone, while at the facility. During the investigation, the facility was briefly toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff and outside sources. It was alleged the licensee did not provide an Admission Agreement to Resident #1's (R1) responsible party. R1 was admitted to the facility on 02/19/24 at approximately 6pm. R1 was transported to the facility via ambulance and upon their arrival a hospice nurse was waiting for R1. The hospice nurse's interview revealed it's a courtesy their agency provides, to be at the facility upon arrival. The hospice nurse confirmed R1 was transitioning and this was going to be another new facility for R1. R1's responsible party confirmed they dRead the full finding— CDSS inspection report, March 13, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240308150746

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted a complaint investigation visit. LPA was greeted and allowed entry into the facility by Staff, Zenia Valdehueza. LPA met with Administrator, Faria Huq. During the investigation, interviews were conducted with staff and outside sources. It was alleged the licensee did not refund the preadmission fee for Resident #1 (R1). On 12/20/23, R1's responsible party had a verbal agreement with the administrator and agreed to move R1 into the facility. On 12/21/23, R1's responsible party issued a check in the amount of $500 for a preadmission fee to hold the room for R1. R1 was awaiting an assessment from the facility, to be admitted. While waiting for the assessment, R1's responsible party changed their mind and decided not to admit R1 to the facility. Title 22 Regulations requires the licensee to provide the applicant or representative with a written general statement describing all costs associated with the preadmission fee. The AdminisRead the full finding— CDSS inspection report, January 3, 2024 · control 08-AS-20231228161104

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit to commence a complaint investigation. LPA identified herself and discussed the allegation mentioned above with Administrator, Faria Huq. During today's visit, LPA briefly toured the facility, interviewed staff, residents, and outside sources. It was alleged the facility staff do not provide quantity of food necessary to meet residents needs. Outside source interviews revealed the residents are served a minimal amount of food, resulting in the residents remaining hungry. It was also reported the residents are too scared to ask for additional food. Staff interviews revealed residents have different food options. Some residents have pureed food, some vegetarian, and other regular meals. Staff will ask the residents what they want to eat. The administrator buys and supplies the food based on the resident's request. Staff also stated residents do not typically finish their meals. Resident interviews confirmed thRead the full finding— CDSS inspection report, June 1, 2023 · control 08-AS-20230524162511