Point Loma Elder Care is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in San Diego, San Diego County, California — state license #374604019, with a licensed capacity of 6, listed as closed, change of ownership in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 23 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated May 8, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

300 homes in view

Point Loma Elder Care

The state record lists this licence as “Closed, Change of Ownership”. A closed licence cannot admit residents. We keep closed licences published because “is this place licensed?” deserves an honest answer.

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 6 residents · San Diego, CA · San Diego County
Closed in state recordWheelchairBedriddenMemory care not on fileHospice not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days · we confirm by phone before any referral
License #374604019, held since 2018 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
3941 Ligget Drive · San Diego, San Diego County
Phone
(619) 255-6448
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 6 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careNot on file — ask the home
Bedridden careApproved for 1 resident

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER; APPROVED FOR CAPACITY OF 6 NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 24 times and filed 23 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on May 8, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

Most recent state visit
May 8, 2026
Occupancy at that visit
6 of 6 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 10 documents with transcribed findings, dated August 22, 2022 to May 8, 2026. 10 of the 10 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (8). 10 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 10 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 16 of 23 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20263 state visits · 3 documents
May 8, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff hit a resident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA)Tiffany Holmes contacted the facility to deliver findings for a complaint investigation via tele-virtual. LPA identified herself to, and explained the purpose of the visit and the basic elements of the complaint with Gaurav Rathi, Administrator. Previous LPA conducted interviews with residents, staff, and outside sources, made observations, and obtained and reviewed pertinent records. LPA conducted the initial visit on April 14, 2025. It was alleged that staff hit a resident. Interviews revealed that the complaint came in 2025 stating that Resident (R1) was hit by a staff one to two years prior. Interviews revealed they were not able to provide a specific date of when this incident occurred, nor the name of the staff member who alledgedly hit the resident. Interviews with an outside source revealed that they did not recieve any complaints about a staff hitting the resident. Interviews with an outside source revealed there was a problematic staff that wasthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 8, 2026 · control 08-AS-20250404145556
Feb 10, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Physical abuse resulting in serious bodily injury. Staff did not safeguard resident's personal items.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janet Ngallo conducted an unannounced subsequent visit to deliver findings regarding the above‑mentioned allegations. LPA identified themselves and met with Administrator Nikki Mundhada, to discuss the purpose of the visit and elements of the complaint. On 11/12/2025, it was alleged that physical abuse towards a resident resulted in serious bodily injury and that staff did not safeguard resident's personal items. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews with facility staff, residents, and a review of facility records. (Cont. on LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 10, 2026 · control 08-AS-20251112192046
Jan 13, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff physically abused resident.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janet Ngallo conducted an unannounced visit to initiate a complaint investigation and deliver findings regarding the above mentioned allegation. LPA identified themselves and met with Facility Manager Vinny Rathi, to discuss the purpose of the visit and elements of the complaint. On 01/06/2026, it was alleged that staff physically abused Resident 1 (R1). The Department’s investigation consisted of an unannounced facility visit, interviews with facility staff, residents, and a review of facility records. (Cont. on LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 13, 2026 · control 08-AS-20260106165520
20254 state visits · 5 documents
Oct 8, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 8, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 26, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Neglect/lack of supervision resulted in resident being abused

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Iby Strong and Janet Ngallo conducted an unannounced complaint visit to initiate an investigation on the above-mentioned allegation. LPAs met Caregiver Hugo Duran and discussed the purpose of the visit. Co Administrator Vinit Rathi and Administrator Nikita Mundhada arrived shortly after. On August 21, 2025, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging Resident 1 was abused. During the investigation, LPA Strong and LPA Ngallo conducted interviews, and reviewed facility records. According to the allegation on an undisclosed date, R1 was abused, there was no information provided on the type of abuse or a name for the suspected abuser. Records collected revealed that R1 has a diagnosis of a major neurocognitive disorder with behavioral disturbances and agitation towards staff. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 26, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250821134711
May 23, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not assist resident with dental care Staff did not assist resident with dressing

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sabel Martinez conducted an unannounced follow up complaint investigation visit and delivered complaint findings. The LPA introduced himself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Administrator Gaurav Rathi. Throughout the investigation, the Department secured records and conducted interviews with external and internal sources, including staff and residents. It was alleged staff did not assist a resident with dental care. On January 17th, 2025, it was reported to the Department staff did not assist Resident # 1 (R1) with cleaning R1’s dental implants, as indicated by R1’s dentist. Review of records revealed R1’s implants needed to be cleaned daily and set in water when not in use. Interviews with internal sources confirmed staff would clean and set R1’s implants in water when not in use. Staff would remind R1 to place and remove the dental implants. (See LIC 9099-C for continuation of report.) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 23, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250117155139
Jan 21, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20242 state visits · 5 documents
Oct 25, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 4, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 4, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 4, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 4, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20233 state visits · 3 documents
Nov 13, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not treat resident with dignity

On 11/13/2023, at about 12:00 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Daniel Pena conducted an unannounced facility visit to conclude a complaint investigation regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA identified himself and discussed the purpose of the visit and complaint conclusion with Hugo Duran, Administrator. On 8/1/2022, CCLD received a complaint alleging a staff person did not treat a resident with dignity. The Department’s investigation consisted of LPA observation, document and video recording review, and interviews with residents, staff, and outside sources. As a result of this investigation, LPA identified a former employee, later determined to be a person of interest in this complaint. LPA interviewed the former employee. The former employee said they lived at the facility but were off duty on 7/29/22. The former employee admitted to LPA they were involved in some type of physical confrontation with Resident 1 (R1). LPA asked the former employee if they picked up and threwthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 13, 2023 · control 08-AS-20220801100505
Oct 20, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 12, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Neglect/Lack of supervision of resident.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Riza Alvarez conducted an unannounced visit on 10/12/2023 to deliver the findings of a complaint investigation initiated in September 2022. LPA identified herself to Staff Nida Capiendo. Administrator Gary Rathi arrived at the facility shortly. On 09/12/2022, Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) received a complaint where it was alleged that Resident 1 (R1) fell and sustained minor injuries due to neglect/lack of supervision by facility staff. The Department investigated the above complaint allegation. The investigation consisted of interviews with facility staff and outside sources, observations, and records review of documents pertinent to the investigation. A tour of the facility premises was conducted on 09/20/2022. Facility records showed that R1 used a walker and sometimes used a wheelchair and was assessed as non-ambulatory. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 12, 2023 · control 08-AS-20220912085344
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations1typical 0
Type B citations1typical 0
Substantiated complaints2typical 0
Total complaints10typical 0
State visits on file24typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2018.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202633020254502024250202356220223302021110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$4,000$6,500 /mo
our estimate — San Diego County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,000 · statewide low$8,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one.
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →

Is Point Loma Elder Care licensed?

No — not currently. The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists Point Loma Elder Care in San Diego (San Diego County), California license #374604019, as “Closed, Change Of Ownership, formerly licensed for 6 residents. State records list 23 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated May 8, 2026, was marked “Unsubstantiated” by the state.

Can Point Loma Elder Care care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Point Loma Elder Care with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care and hospice care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER; APPROVED FOR CAPACITY OF 6 NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN.

How much does Point Loma Elder Care cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Point Loma Elder Care's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Diego County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Point Loma Elder Care accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Point Loma Elder Care is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

6 of 6 beds occupied (100%) when the state visited on May 8, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Point Loma Elder Care?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 24 state visits and 23 dated documents since 2021 for Point Loma Elder Care; 10 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated May 8, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

10 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff hit a resident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA)Tiffany Holmes contacted the facility to deliver findings for a complaint investigation via tele-virtual. LPA identified herself to, and explained the purpose of the visit and the basic elements of the complaint with Gaurav Rathi, Administrator. Previous LPA conducted interviews with residents, staff, and outside sources, made observations, and obtained and reviewed pertinent records. LPA conducted the initial visit on April 14, 2025. It was alleged that staff hit a resident. Interviews revealed that the complaint came in 2025 stating that Resident (R1) was hit by a staff one to two years prior. Interviews revealed they were not able to provide a specific date of when this incident occurred, nor the name of the staff member who alledgedly hit the resident. Interviews with an outside source revealed that they did not recieve any complaints about a staff hitting the resident. Interviews with an outside source revealed there was a problematic staff that wasCDSS inspection report, May 8, 2026 · control 08-AS-20250404145556
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedPhysical abuse resulting in serious bodily injury. Staff did not safeguard resident's personal items.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janet Ngallo conducted an unannounced subsequent visit to deliver findings regarding the above‑mentioned allegations. LPA identified themselves and met with Administrator Nikki Mundhada, to discuss the purpose of the visit and elements of the complaint. On 11/12/2025, it was alleged that physical abuse towards a resident resulted in serious bodily injury and that staff did not safeguard resident's personal items. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews with facility staff, residents, and a review of facility records. (Cont. on LIC 9099-C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 10, 2026 · control 08-AS-20251112192046
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff physically abused resident.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janet Ngallo conducted an unannounced visit to initiate a complaint investigation and deliver findings regarding the above mentioned allegation. LPA identified themselves and met with Facility Manager Vinny Rathi, to discuss the purpose of the visit and elements of the complaint. On 01/06/2026, it was alleged that staff physically abused Resident 1 (R1). The Department’s investigation consisted of an unannounced facility visit, interviews with facility staff, residents, and a review of facility records. (Cont. on LIC 9099-C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 13, 2026 · control 08-AS-20260106165520

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedNeglect/lack of supervision resulted in resident being abused
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Iby Strong and Janet Ngallo conducted an unannounced complaint visit to initiate an investigation on the above-mentioned allegation. LPAs met Caregiver Hugo Duran and discussed the purpose of the visit. Co Administrator Vinit Rathi and Administrator Nikita Mundhada arrived shortly after. On August 21, 2025, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging Resident 1 was abused. During the investigation, LPA Strong and LPA Ngallo conducted interviews, and reviewed facility records. According to the allegation on an undisclosed date, R1 was abused, there was no information provided on the type of abuse or a name for the suspected abuser. Records collected revealed that R1 has a diagnosis of a major neurocognitive disorder with behavioral disturbances and agitation towards staff. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 26, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250821134711
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not assist resident with dental care Staff did not assist resident with dressing
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sabel Martinez conducted an unannounced follow up complaint investigation visit and delivered complaint findings. The LPA introduced himself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Administrator Gaurav Rathi. Throughout the investigation, the Department secured records and conducted interviews with external and internal sources, including staff and residents. It was alleged staff did not assist a resident with dental care. On January 17th, 2025, it was reported to the Department staff did not assist Resident # 1 (R1) with cleaning R1’s dental implants, as indicated by R1’s dentist. Review of records revealed R1’s implants needed to be cleaned daily and set in water when not in use. Interviews with internal sources confirmed staff would clean and set R1’s implants in water when not in use. Staff would remind R1 to place and remove the dental implants. (See LIC 9099-C for continuation of report.) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 23, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250117155139

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not treat resident with dignity
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 11/13/2023, at about 12:00 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Daniel Pena conducted an unannounced facility visit to conclude a complaint investigation regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA identified himself and discussed the purpose of the visit and complaint conclusion with Hugo Duran, Administrator. On 8/1/2022, CCLD received a complaint alleging a staff person did not treat a resident with dignity. The Department’s investigation consisted of LPA observation, document and video recording review, and interviews with residents, staff, and outside sources. As a result of this investigation, LPA identified a former employee, later determined to be a person of interest in this complaint. LPA interviewed the former employee. The former employee said they lived at the facility but were off duty on 7/29/22. The former employee admitted to LPA they were involved in some type of physical confrontation with Resident 1 (R1). LPA asked the former employee if they picked up and threwCDSS inspection report, November 13, 2023 · control 08-AS-20220801100505
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedNeglect/Lack of supervision of resident.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Riza Alvarez conducted an unannounced visit on 10/12/2023 to deliver the findings of a complaint investigation initiated in September 2022. LPA identified herself to Staff Nida Capiendo. Administrator Gary Rathi arrived at the facility shortly. On 09/12/2022, Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) received a complaint where it was alleged that Resident 1 (R1) fell and sustained minor injuries due to neglect/lack of supervision by facility staff. The Department investigated the above complaint allegation. The investigation consisted of interviews with facility staff and outside sources, observations, and records review of documents pertinent to the investigation. A tour of the facility premises was conducted on 09/20/2022. Facility records showed that R1 used a walker and sometimes used a wheelchair and was assessed as non-ambulatory. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 12, 2023 · control 08-AS-20220912085344
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed- Staff did not afford resident with dignity. - Staff yelled at resident. - Staff did not afford resident to be free from intimidation.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings regarding the above-mentioned allegations. LPA identified herself and was granted entry by Carmelita Crisolo, Caregiver. LPA stated the purpose of the visit and reviewed the findings of the complaint with Facility Manager/Co-Administrator, Travonna Washington. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews with staff, residents, and outside sources, records review of relevant documents pertinent to this investigation, and LPA observations. On March 11, 2021, it was alleged that the facility did not accord residents with dignity. It was also alleged that staff yelled at a resident. It was lastly alleged that staff did not afford residents to be free from intimidation. It was specifically alleged that staff did not accord residents with dignity and would enforce napping by using furniture as a “restraint” to block the bed while a resident was napping. Interviews with outsideCDSS inspection report, March 30, 2023 · control 08-AS-20210311142952
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedMeals did not meet resident's needs
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rebecca Ruiz conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to deliver findings regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA identified herself to, was greeted by, and explained the purpose of the visit to Administrator Travonna Washington. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews with residents, staff, and outside sources, records review, and a tour of the facility. It was alleged that meals did not meet resident’s needs. Review of resident 1’s (R1) medical records revealed that R1 required a mechanical soft diet and required staff assistance with all activities of daily living, including eating meals, bathing, dressing, and toileting. Record review revealed that R1’s medical condition declined and R1 was admitted to hospice care in January 2022. Interviews and record review revealed that R1 had declined in meal intake directly prior to being admitted to hospice care and had poor meal intake while under hospice care. Continued onCDSS inspection report, March 23, 2023 · control 08-AS-20220309105309

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 24 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
1
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
1
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
2
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
10
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
24
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(619) 255-6448
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Point Loma Elder Care? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.