Villa Lorena is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in San Diego, San Diego County, California — state license #374603750, licensed for 85 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 25 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated April 14, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

0 homes in view

Villa Lorena

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 85 residents · San Diego, CA · San Diego County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #374603750, held since 2017 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
14740 Via Fiesta · San Diego, San Diego County
Phone
(858) 583-8480
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 85 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 10 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 10 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 85 NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH 10 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. ALL ROOMS APPROVED FOR BEDRIDDEN FOR MAXIMUM OF TEN (10) BEDRIDDEN RESIDENTS. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR TEN (10) RESIDENTS. NEW MANAGEMENT COMPANY: VLGP INC. EFFECTIVE 11/1/2022.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 30 times and filed 25 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on April 14, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

Most recent state visit
July 17, 2026
Occupancy at the April 14, 2026 visit
60 of 85 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 16 documents with transcribed findings, dated September 30, 2021 to April 14, 2026. 16 of the 16 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (7), “Unsubstantiated” (9). 16 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 16 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 21 of 25 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20262 state visits · 2 documents
Apr 14, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not meet resident's incontinence needs. Facility did not follow food service requirements.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arian Golbakhsh conducted an unannounced subsequent visit for a complaint investigation and delivered findings regarding the above mentioned allegations. LPA was welcomed by, identified themselves to, and discussed the purpose of their visit to Business Office Director Denise Nguyen, then Executive Director Nora Garza, who arrived shortly after LPA. On 12/04/2025, the Department received a complaint where it was alleged that the facility left a resident (identified as R1) in a soiled brief for an extended period of time. Additionally, it was alleged that the facility was not following food service requirements, specifically that the facility did not provide a full dinner meal to R1 and that food items in the fridge of R1's unit were not labelled. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, records review, and interviews with staff, residents, and outside sources. [Continued on LIC 9099-C 1/3] Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 14, 2026 · control 08-AS-20251204154407
Mar 26, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20254 state visits · 10 documents
Jul 11, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident incurred unexplained bruising while in care. Resident's care needs were not met. Facility did not accord resident with adequate hygiene supplies. Facility did not ensure medical care for resident. Staff did not clean resident's room. Facility staff did not safeguard resident's personal information.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Rodgers met with Administrator Nora Garza to deliver findings on the above-mentioned allegation. LPA identified herself and disclosed the purpose of her visit with Administrator Nora Garza and conducted the meeting via phone call. On June 23, 2022, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging the above-listed allegations. During the investigation, LPA briefly toured the facility, requested records, and interviewed staff and outside sources. Review of R1’s medical assessment records dated March 11, 2022, revealed that Resident #1(R1) had a diagnosis of dementia as well as a visual impairment, was confused and disoriented, had wandering behavior as well as aggressive behavior. R1 resides in the memory care area of the facility. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 11, 2025 · control 08-AS-20220623102437
Jul 11, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Physical abuse to resident by staff.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Rodgers met with Administrator Nora Garza to deliver findings on the above-mentioned allegation. LPA identified herself and disclosed the purpose of her visit with Administrator Nora Garza and conducted the meeting via phone call. On November 14, 2024, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging that the Resident #1(R1) was physically abused by licensee Staff #1(S1) and sustained injuries as a result of the alleged abuse. [See LIC811 Confidential Name List for identification of select person identifiers used in this report]. The Department’s investigation consisted of an unannounced facility visit, records review, and staff, resident, and outside source interviews. (Continued on 9099-C) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 11, 2025 · control 08-AS-20241119093137
Jun 5, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility did not provide records to resident's responsible party Facility did not notify resident’s responsible party of an incident Facility did not update resident's records

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Rodgers conducted a visit to deliver findings regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA was allowed entry by the receptionist. LPA identified herself, met with, and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Administrator Nora Garza. On March 25, 2022, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging that the facility did not provide records to the resident's responsible party, did not notify the resident’s responsible party of an incident, and did not update the resident's records. During the investigation, the department collected resident records, conducted interviews, and reviewed written correspondence. Based on Resident 1 (R1) Physician’s Report dated April 22, 2022, R1 is diagnosed with Alzheimer's Dementia, and R1 has a designated responsible party. Additionally, R1’s Preplacement Appraisal reveals R1 needs assistance with all dressing and prompting. (continued on LIC9099) Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 5, 2025 · control 08-AS-20220325123701
Jun 5, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff falsified document

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Rodgers conducted an visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegations. LPA was welcomed by, identified himself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Administrator Nora Garza. CCLD’s investigation involved unannounced facility tours, review of relevant records and written correspondence, and interviews with staff and outside sources. On March 18, 2022, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging that the licensee's staff falsified documents. More specifically, a PRC COVID-19 test was altered for resident #1(R1). Interviews reveal that R1 developed symptoms of COVID 19 prior to an in-person visit by R1's responsible person on 2/12/2022. Interviews with R1's responsible person further reveal R1 was removed from isolation on 2/14/2022. The department conducted a records review for R1 and the charting records for R1 reflect a gap in chart reporting from 1/12/2022 to 3/25/2022. Therefore, the department could nthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 5, 2025 · control 08-AS-20220318124522
Jun 5, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not assist resident with medication administration Resident was charged for items never provided Licensee did not provide an itemized statement for charges Licensee did not meet resident's transportation needs Housekeeping services did not meet resident's needs License did not meet resident's dining needs

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Rodgers conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegations. LPA was welcomed by, identified himself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Administrator Nora Garza In February 2022, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received complaints alleging that Licensee staff did not assist a resident with medication administration, the resident was charged for items never provided, Licensee staff did not provide an itemized statement for charges, Licensee did not meet the resident's transportation needs, and License did not meet resident's dining needs. CCLD’s investigation involved unannounced facility tours, review of relevant records and written correspondence, and interviews with staff, residents and outside sources. (Contuned on LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 5, 2025 · control 08-AS-20220211100740
Jun 5, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff handled resident roughly resulting in bruises.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Amy Rodgers, conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above-mentioned allegations. LPA was allowed entry by the receptionist and met with Administrator Nora Garza. LPA identified herself and discussed the purpose of the visit. Investigation was conducted by the Community Care Licensing (CCLD) Investigative Branch (IB) Investigator. The Department’s investigation included a tour of the facility, observations, records reviews, and interviews with staff and outside sources. Prior to the investigation, the CDSS/CCLD/Investigations Branch Investigator interviewed the reporting party and reviewed the facility file. On February 15, 2022, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging facility staff handled resident roughly resulting in bruises. More specially, that an altercation occurred between Resident #1 (R1) and Staff #1 (S1) that resulted in bruising of R1. (Continued on LIC 9099-C) Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 5, 2025 · control 08-AS-20220215101301
Jun 5, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not follow COVID-19 guidance Facility was in disrepair Staff spoke inappropriately to residents

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Rodgers conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegations. LPA was welcomed by, identified himself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Administrator Nora Garza OIn February 2022, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received complaints alleging that Licensee staff did not follow COVID-19 guidance, Resident #1(R1) room was in disrepair and licensee staff spoke inappropriately to R1. CCLD’s investigation involved unannounced facility tours, review of relevant records and written correspondence, and interviews with staff, residents and outside sources. [CONTINUED ON LIC 9099-C] Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 5, 2025 · control 08-AS-20220210154600
Apr 24, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not allow resident to have visitors. Licensee did not safeguard resident's belongings.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Rodgers made an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the above-mentioned allegation. LPA identified herself and disclosed the purpose of her visit with Administrator Nora Garza. On June 6, 2022, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging that the Licensee did not allow Resident #1(R1) visitors and that the Licensee did not safeguard R1's belongings. During the investigation, LPA briefly toured the facility, requested records, and interviewed staff and outside sources. The review of the physicians report (dated 7/14/2021) reveals R1 has some impairment in hearing and is legally blind. R1 was an assisted living resident. Records review indicate R1 has a history of paranoia and distrust. Interview with staff indicate that R1 has a history of confusion and disorientation. (Continued on 9099-C) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 24, 2025 · control 08-AS-20220608130716
Apr 24, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 20, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20246 state visits · 8 documents
Oct 24, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not ensure residents are assessed for proper care placement Lack of supervision resulted in residents eloping Licensee staff did not meet personal care needs for residents

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Amy Rodgers conducted an unannouced visit to deliver findings regarding the above-mentioned allegations. LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Resident Service Director Maureen Manzon. On 10/7/2024 it was alleged that Licensee did not ensure residents are assessed for proper care placement and lack of supervision resulted in residents eloping, and licensee staff did not meet personal care needs for residents. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, interviews with facility staff, residents and outside sources, records review, and LPA observations. It was alleged that Licensee did not ensure residents are assessed for proper care placement for four residents (R1-R4). [See LIC 811 Confidential Names List for a description of R1.] and they should be placed in the memory care unit. A review of facility records reveals there are currently four residents (R1-R4) that reside in the assisted livingthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 24, 2024 · control 08-AS-20241007110409
Oct 24, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility showers do not dispense hot water Facility has insufficient staffing to meet the needs of residents Staff use objects to obstruct the doorway in the memory care unit The alarm in the memory care unit is in disrepair The facility Administrator is not available a sufficient amount of time to manage the daily operations of the facility Staff are not adequately trained. Lack of supervision resulting in resident eloping from the facility

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Amy Rodgers conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above-mentioned allegations. LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Resident Service Director Maureen Manzon. On 8/20/2024 it was alleged that Licensee did not ensure showers in memory care unit were at complaint temperatures, there is not enough staffing in memory care which resulted in the licensee not meeting the residents needs, the delayed egress alarm in the memory care unit is not working, the memory care director does not respond to help from staff which effects the daily operations of the facility, staff are not properly trained and lack of supervision resulted in a resident in memory care unit eloping from the facility. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, interviews with facility staff and outside sources, records review, and LPA observations. (continued on 9099-C] Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 24, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240820121327
Oct 1, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 28, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 26, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff tampered with resident's personal belongings. Resident was not provided with safe equipment.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit to conclude the complaint investigation regarding the above mentioned allegations. LPA met with Executive Director, Jose Collado Jr. and Memory Care Director, Marie Lou Fikingas. During the investigation, the facility was briefly toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff and outside sources. It was alleged that staff tampered with Resident #1’s (R1) personal belongings, involving their laptop. R1 had a laptop in their room with an active camera, which was used for Zoom calls with their family. One day a medication technician went to R1’s room to dispense medications and observed themselves on the camera as though it was being recorded. The medication technician left the room and reported the camera to the Executive Director (ED). The ED went to R1’s room to verify if the camera was in use. The ED confirmed the facility does not have cameras in the building as they prefer staff and residethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 26, 2024 · control 08-AS-20220831154817
Mar 26, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: -Facility does not have adequate staffing to meet resident's needs -Facility is malodorous

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit to conclude the investigation regarding the above-mentioned allegations. LPA met with Executive Director, Jose Collado Jr. and Memory Care Director, Marie Lou Fikingas. During the investigation, the facility was briefly toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff, residents, and outside sources. It was alleged the facility does not have adequate staffing to meet the residents’ needs in the memory care unit. A review of staffing schedules indicated sufficient staffing. Staff interviews confirmed the facility had sufficient staffing. Staff also stated if a staff member calls out then the existing staff will work over one (1)-two (2) hours or a manager will assist. The facility will also use staff from their assisted living portion of the facility when necessary. The Executive Director’s (ED) interview confirmed the facility had sufficient staffing. ED also stated the facility does not use athe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 26, 2024 · control 08-AS-20221031133222
Mar 12, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident eloped Staff not following resident's care plan Staff did not notice resident's change in condition

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tiffany Holmes conducted an unannounced visit to close out the complaint investigation regarding the above-mentioned allegations. LPA identified herself and met with Jose "Joey" Collado,Executive Director & Amy Salvador Resident Service Director, to discuss the purpose of the visit and elements of the complaint. On or around February 2022, it was alleged that the resident eloped. Interviews revealed Resident 1 (R1) usually takes walks around the facility. Interviews revealed that R1 walks along the perimeter of the facility a few times a day. R1 has not eloped from the facility. The facility is surrounded by a large gate and R1 does walk outside of the facilty and there is a sitting area out there that R1 will go sit at. Interviews revealed if R1 does walk any further staff are close behind. R1 loves to walk/exercise and will walk back and forth. There are no incident reports of R1 eloping from the facility. There were no witness statements to support ththe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 12, 2024 · control 08-AS-20220317135636
Feb 20, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20231 state visit · 1 document
Nov 15, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations1typical 1
Type B citations11typical 1
Substantiated complaints12typical 2
Total complaints15typical 7
State visits on file30typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2017.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026220202541042024681202322120221202021111
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — San Diego County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (858) 583-8480

Is Villa Lorena licensed?

Yes — Villa Lorena is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in San Diego (San Diego County): California license #374603750, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 85 residents. State records list 25 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated April 14, 2026, was marked “Unsubstantiated” by the state.

Can Villa Lorena care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Villa Lorena with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 85 NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH 10 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. ALL ROOMS APPROVED FOR BEDRIDDEN FOR MAXIMUM OF TEN (10) BEDRIDDEN RESIDENTS. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR TEN (10) RESIDENTS. NEW MANAGEMENT COMPANY: VLGP INC. EFFECTIVE 11/1/2022.

How much does Villa Lorena cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Villa Lorena's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Diego County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Villa Lorena accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Villa Lorena is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

60 of 85 beds occupied (71%) when the state visited on April 14, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Villa Lorena?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 30 state visits and 25 dated documents since 2021 for Villa Lorena; 16 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated April 14, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

16 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee did not meet resident's incontinence needs. Facility did not follow food service requirements.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arian Golbakhsh conducted an unannounced subsequent visit for a complaint investigation and delivered findings regarding the above mentioned allegations. LPA was welcomed by, identified themselves to, and discussed the purpose of their visit to Business Office Director Denise Nguyen, then Executive Director Nora Garza, who arrived shortly after LPA. On 12/04/2025, the Department received a complaint where it was alleged that the facility left a resident (identified as R1) in a soiled brief for an extended period of time. Additionally, it was alleged that the facility was not following food service requirements, specifically that the facility did not provide a full dinner meal to R1 and that food items in the fridge of R1's unit were not labelled. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, records review, and interviews with staff, residents, and outside sources. [Continued on LIC 9099-C 1/3] UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 14, 2026 · control 08-AS-20251204154407

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident incurred unexplained bruising while in care. Resident's care needs were not met. Facility did not accord resident with adequate hygiene supplies. Facility did not ensure medical care for resident. Staff did not clean resident's room. Facility staff did not safeguard resident's personal information.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Rodgers met with Administrator Nora Garza to deliver findings on the above-mentioned allegation. LPA identified herself and disclosed the purpose of her visit with Administrator Nora Garza and conducted the meeting via phone call. On June 23, 2022, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging the above-listed allegations. During the investigation, LPA briefly toured the facility, requested records, and interviewed staff and outside sources. Review of R1’s medical assessment records dated March 11, 2022, revealed that Resident #1(R1) had a diagnosis of dementia as well as a visual impairment, was confused and disoriented, had wandering behavior as well as aggressive behavior. R1 resides in the memory care area of the facility. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 11, 2025 · control 08-AS-20220623102437
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedPhysical abuse to resident by staff.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Rodgers met with Administrator Nora Garza to deliver findings on the above-mentioned allegation. LPA identified herself and disclosed the purpose of her visit with Administrator Nora Garza and conducted the meeting via phone call. On November 14, 2024, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging that the Resident #1(R1) was physically abused by licensee Staff #1(S1) and sustained injuries as a result of the alleged abuse. [See LIC811 Confidential Name List for identification of select person identifiers used in this report]. The Department’s investigation consisted of an unannounced facility visit, records review, and staff, resident, and outside source interviews. (Continued on 9099-C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 11, 2025 · control 08-AS-20241119093137
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not provide records to resident's responsible party Facility did not notify resident’s responsible party of an incident Facility did not update resident's records
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Rodgers conducted a visit to deliver findings regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA was allowed entry by the receptionist. LPA identified herself, met with, and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Administrator Nora Garza. On March 25, 2022, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging that the facility did not provide records to the resident's responsible party, did not notify the resident’s responsible party of an incident, and did not update the resident's records. During the investigation, the department collected resident records, conducted interviews, and reviewed written correspondence. Based on Resident 1 (R1) Physician’s Report dated April 22, 2022, R1 is diagnosed with Alzheimer's Dementia, and R1 has a designated responsible party. Additionally, R1’s Preplacement Appraisal reveals R1 needs assistance with all dressing and prompting. (continued on LIC9099) SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, June 5, 2025 · control 08-AS-20220325123701
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff falsified document
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Rodgers conducted an visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegations. LPA was welcomed by, identified himself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Administrator Nora Garza. CCLD’s investigation involved unannounced facility tours, review of relevant records and written correspondence, and interviews with staff and outside sources. On March 18, 2022, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging that the licensee's staff falsified documents. More specifically, a PRC COVID-19 test was altered for resident #1(R1). Interviews reveal that R1 developed symptoms of COVID 19 prior to an in-person visit by R1's responsible person on 2/12/2022. Interviews with R1's responsible person further reveal R1 was removed from isolation on 2/14/2022. The department conducted a records review for R1 and the charting records for R1 reflect a gap in chart reporting from 1/12/2022 to 3/25/2022. Therefore, the department could nCDSS inspection report, June 5, 2025 · control 08-AS-20220318124522
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee did not assist resident with medication administration Resident was charged for items never provided Licensee did not provide an itemized statement for charges Licensee did not meet resident's transportation needs Housekeeping services did not meet resident's needs License did not meet resident's dining needs
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Rodgers conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegations. LPA was welcomed by, identified himself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Administrator Nora Garza In February 2022, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received complaints alleging that Licensee staff did not assist a resident with medication administration, the resident was charged for items never provided, Licensee staff did not provide an itemized statement for charges, Licensee did not meet the resident's transportation needs, and License did not meet resident's dining needs. CCLD’s investigation involved unannounced facility tours, review of relevant records and written correspondence, and interviews with staff, residents and outside sources. (Contuned on LIC 9099-C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, June 5, 2025 · control 08-AS-20220211100740
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff handled resident roughly resulting in bruises.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Amy Rodgers, conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above-mentioned allegations. LPA was allowed entry by the receptionist and met with Administrator Nora Garza. LPA identified herself and discussed the purpose of the visit. Investigation was conducted by the Community Care Licensing (CCLD) Investigative Branch (IB) Investigator. The Department’s investigation included a tour of the facility, observations, records reviews, and interviews with staff and outside sources. Prior to the investigation, the CDSS/CCLD/Investigations Branch Investigator interviewed the reporting party and reviewed the facility file. On February 15, 2022, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging facility staff handled resident roughly resulting in bruises. More specially, that an altercation occurred between Resident #1 (R1) and Staff #1 (S1) that resulted in bruising of R1. (Continued on LIC 9099-C) SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, June 5, 2025 · control 08-AS-20220215101301
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee did not follow COVID-19 guidance Facility was in disrepair Staff spoke inappropriately to residents
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Rodgers conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegations. LPA was welcomed by, identified himself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Administrator Nora Garza OIn February 2022, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received complaints alleging that Licensee staff did not follow COVID-19 guidance, Resident #1(R1) room was in disrepair and licensee staff spoke inappropriately to R1. CCLD’s investigation involved unannounced facility tours, review of relevant records and written correspondence, and interviews with staff, residents and outside sources. [CONTINUED ON LIC 9099-C] SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, June 5, 2025 · control 08-AS-20220210154600
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee did not allow resident to have visitors. Licensee did not safeguard resident's belongings.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Rodgers made an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the above-mentioned allegation. LPA identified herself and disclosed the purpose of her visit with Administrator Nora Garza. On June 6, 2022, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging that the Licensee did not allow Resident #1(R1) visitors and that the Licensee did not safeguard R1's belongings. During the investigation, LPA briefly toured the facility, requested records, and interviewed staff and outside sources. The review of the physicians report (dated 7/14/2021) reveals R1 has some impairment in hearing and is legally blind. R1 was an assisted living resident. Records review indicate R1 has a history of paranoia and distrust. Interview with staff indicate that R1 has a history of confusion and disorientation. (Continued on 9099-C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 24, 2025 · control 08-AS-20220608130716

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee did not ensure residents are assessed for proper care placement Lack of supervision resulted in residents eloping Licensee staff did not meet personal care needs for residents
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Amy Rodgers conducted an unannouced visit to deliver findings regarding the above-mentioned allegations. LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Resident Service Director Maureen Manzon. On 10/7/2024 it was alleged that Licensee did not ensure residents are assessed for proper care placement and lack of supervision resulted in residents eloping, and licensee staff did not meet personal care needs for residents. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, interviews with facility staff, residents and outside sources, records review, and LPA observations. It was alleged that Licensee did not ensure residents are assessed for proper care placement for four residents (R1-R4). [See LIC 811 Confidential Names List for a description of R1.] and they should be placed in the memory care unit. A review of facility records reveals there are currently four residents (R1-R4) that reside in the assisted livingCDSS inspection report, October 24, 2024 · control 08-AS-20241007110409
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility showers do not dispense hot water Facility has insufficient staffing to meet the needs of residents Staff use objects to obstruct the doorway in the memory care unit The alarm in the memory care unit is in disrepair The facility Administrator is not available a sufficient amount of time to manage the daily operations of the facility Staff are not adequately trained. Lack of supervision resulting in resident eloping from the facility
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Amy Rodgers conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above-mentioned allegations. LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Resident Service Director Maureen Manzon. On 8/20/2024 it was alleged that Licensee did not ensure showers in memory care unit were at complaint temperatures, there is not enough staffing in memory care which resulted in the licensee not meeting the residents needs, the delayed egress alarm in the memory care unit is not working, the memory care director does not respond to help from staff which effects the daily operations of the facility, staff are not properly trained and lack of supervision resulted in a resident in memory care unit eloping from the facility. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, interviews with facility staff and outside sources, records review, and LPA observations. (continued on 9099-C] UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 24, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240820121327
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff tampered with resident's personal belongings. Resident was not provided with safe equipment.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit to conclude the complaint investigation regarding the above mentioned allegations. LPA met with Executive Director, Jose Collado Jr. and Memory Care Director, Marie Lou Fikingas. During the investigation, the facility was briefly toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff and outside sources. It was alleged that staff tampered with Resident #1’s (R1) personal belongings, involving their laptop. R1 had a laptop in their room with an active camera, which was used for Zoom calls with their family. One day a medication technician went to R1’s room to dispense medications and observed themselves on the camera as though it was being recorded. The medication technician left the room and reported the camera to the Executive Director (ED). The ED went to R1’s room to verify if the camera was in use. The ED confirmed the facility does not have cameras in the building as they prefer staff and resideCDSS inspection report, March 26, 2024 · control 08-AS-20220831154817
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed-Facility does not have adequate staffing to meet resident's needs -Facility is malodorous
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit to conclude the investigation regarding the above-mentioned allegations. LPA met with Executive Director, Jose Collado Jr. and Memory Care Director, Marie Lou Fikingas. During the investigation, the facility was briefly toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff, residents, and outside sources. It was alleged the facility does not have adequate staffing to meet the residents’ needs in the memory care unit. A review of staffing schedules indicated sufficient staffing. Staff interviews confirmed the facility had sufficient staffing. Staff also stated if a staff member calls out then the existing staff will work over one (1)-two (2) hours or a manager will assist. The facility will also use staff from their assisted living portion of the facility when necessary. The Executive Director’s (ED) interview confirmed the facility had sufficient staffing. ED also stated the facility does not use aCDSS inspection report, March 26, 2024 · control 08-AS-20221031133222
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident eloped Staff not following resident's care plan Staff did not notice resident's change in condition
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tiffany Holmes conducted an unannounced visit to close out the complaint investigation regarding the above-mentioned allegations. LPA identified herself and met with Jose "Joey" Collado,Executive Director & Amy Salvador Resident Service Director, to discuss the purpose of the visit and elements of the complaint. On or around February 2022, it was alleged that the resident eloped. Interviews revealed Resident 1 (R1) usually takes walks around the facility. Interviews revealed that R1 walks along the perimeter of the facility a few times a day. R1 has not eloped from the facility. The facility is surrounded by a large gate and R1 does walk outside of the facilty and there is a sitting area out there that R1 will go sit at. Interviews revealed if R1 does walk any further staff are close behind. R1 loves to walk/exercise and will walk back and forth. There are no incident reports of R1 eloping from the facility. There were no witness statements to support thCDSS inspection report, March 12, 2024 · control 08-AS-20220317135636

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 30 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
1
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
11
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
12
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
15
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
30
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(858) 583-8480
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Villa Lorena? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.