Monarch Cottages La Jolla is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in La Jolla, San Diego County, California — state license #374603724, licensed for 52 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 10 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2023, the most recent dated March 11, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

2 homes in view

Monarch Cottages La Jolla

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 52 residents · La Jolla, CA · San Diego County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #374603724, held since 2018 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
7630 Fay Avenue · La Jolla, San Diego County
Phone
(858) 924-8530
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 52 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careVerified in record
Bedridden careApproved for 8 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER, 52 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH EIGHT (8) MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR TWELVE (12) RESIDENTS. APPROVED FOR DELAYED EGRESS THROUGHOUT THE FACILITY. MGMT.CO.COGIR SL LA JOLLA LLC EFFECTIVE 5/12/26.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2023, the state has visited this home 13 times and filed 10 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on March 11, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Substantiated.”

Most recent state visit
March 11, 2026
Occupancy at that visit
17 of 52 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 6 documents with transcribed findings, dated January 28, 2025 to March 11, 2026. 6 of the 6 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (3), “Unsubstantiated” (3). 6 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 6 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 9 of 10 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20263 state visits · 3 documents
Mar 11, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: - Staff did not provide two-person assist for resident transfer.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Becky Kennedy conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to deliver findings on the above . LPA was granted entry to the facility and met with Risa Jester, Executive Director, after identifying herself and explaining the reason for the visit. The Department’s investigation consisted of review of facility records, outside source records, and interviews of facility staff and outside sources. It was alleged that facility staff did not provide two-person assist for resident transfer. A review of facility records revealed thar Staff 1 (S1) did transfer Resident 1 (R1) without assistance. R1’s care plan requires a two-person transfer for the safety of R1 and staff members. The allegation is therefore Substantiated, and one (1) deficiency was cited for it per California Code of Regulations, Title 22 (refer to the attached LIC 9099-D page). A Plan of Correction was jointly developed with the Licensee. An exit interview was conducted with Risa Jesterthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 11, 2026 · control 08-AS-20210728124213
Jan 14, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 12, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility did not meet resident's hygiene needs.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Becky Kennedy conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to the facility to deliver findings regarding the above allegation. LPA was granted entry to the facility after identifying herself. LPA met with Karen Moran, LVN Cognitive Entrenchment Director and explained the reason for the visit. The Department’s investigation consisted of LPA observations, a review of facility and outside source records, and interviews of internal and outside sources. It was alleged that the facility did not meet resident's hygiene needs. Specifically, that the facility did not provide for or arrange for proper foot care resulting in Resident 1’s (R1) toenails being uncut and grown significantly beyond the ends of R1’s toes. The investigation determined through interviews and a review of internal and external documents that at the time of R1’s admission to the facility consent was given for R1 to receive podiatry care from an outside provider. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 12, 2026 · control 08-AS-20210402112310
20254 state visits · 5 documents
Dec 29, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff handled resident in a rough manner. Staff did not respond timely to resident’s call button. Facility did not provide adequate incontinence care for resident.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Becky Kennedy conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to the facility to deliver findings regarding the above allegations. LPA was granted entry to the facility after identifying herself. LPA met with Risa Jester, Executive Director and explained the reason for the visit. The Department’s investigation consisted of LPA observations, a review of facility and outside source records, and interviews of internal and outside sources. It was alleged that staff handled Resident 1 (R1) in a rough manner. The allegation was that a staff member pulled an item from a resident’s hand. There was no specific object identified in the allegation. Interviews with internal and external sources did not reveal any confirming evidence that R1 or any other resident was treated in a rough manner. This allegation is Unsubstantiated. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 29, 2025 · control 08-AS-20210913092229
Jun 4, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not seek medical attention for resident

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Arian Golbakhsh and Iby Strong conducted an unannounced visit to open a complaint investigation and delivered findings regarding the above mentioned allegation. LPAs were welcomed by, identified themselves to, and discussed the purpose of their visit to Executive Director Risa Jester. On 05/27/2025, the Department received a complaint allegation where it was alleged that a resident at the facility identified as (R1) sustained a fall and did not receive medical care. No timeline was provided in the complaint regarding when R1 had fallen. The Department’s investigation consisted of an unannounced facility visit, records review, and interviews with staff, residents, and outside sources. [Continued on LIC 9099-C] Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 4, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250527152121
Jun 4, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Neglect/Lack of Supervision resulted in resident sustaining serious injury.

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Iby Strong and Arian Golbakhsh conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings in the above-mentioned allegation. LPAs met with Executive Director RIsa Jester and discussed the purpose of the visit. On June 13, 2023, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging neglect/lack of supervision resulted in Resident 1 (R1) (R1 – see LIC811 Confidential Names List) sustaining serious injuries. According to R1’s Physician Report, R1 is diagnosed with a major neurocognitive disorder, is non-ambulatory, and has motor impairment/paralysis. R1’s Needs and Services Plan states R1 is a total assist with activities of daily living and a two person assist with bathing, washing and toileting. During investigation, the Department collected pertinent resident records as well as facility documentation and conducted interviews. According to the allegation, on an undisclosed date in May of 2023, R1 was being transported and dropped by an unknown sthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 4, 2025 · control 08-AS-20230613182530
Jan 28, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not follow infection control procedures

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sabel Martinez conducted an unannounced a follow up complaint investigation visit, and delivered complaint findings. The LPA introduced himself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Congnitive Enrichment Director Alicia Prichard. Throughout the investigation, the Department secured records and conducted interviews with external and internal sources. It was alleged staff did not follow infection control procedures. On 8/23/2024 it was reported to the Department Resident # 1 (R1) was diagnosed with an infectious disease and the facility was not following infection control procedures. Interviews with both internal and external sources confirmed R1 was diagnosed with Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 28, 2025 · control 08-AS-20240823095237
Jan 14, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20241 state visit · 1 document
Jan 9, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations1typical 1
Type B citations2typical 1
Substantiated complaints3typical 2
Total complaints6typical 7
State visits on file13typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2018.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026332202545120241102023110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — San Diego County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (858) 924-8530

Is Monarch Cottages La Jolla licensed?

Yes — Monarch Cottages La Jolla is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in La Jolla (San Diego County): California license #374603724, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 52 residents. State records list 10 inspection and complaint documents since 2023; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated March 11, 2026, was marked “Substantiated” by the state.

Can Monarch Cottages La Jolla care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Monarch Cottages La Jolla with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER, 52 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH EIGHT (8) MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR TWELVE (12) RESIDENTS. APPROVED FOR DELAYED EGRESS THROUGHOUT THE FACILITY. MGMT.CO.COGIR SL LA JOLLA LLC EFFECTIVE 5/12/26.

How much does Monarch Cottages La Jolla cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Monarch Cottages La Jolla's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Diego County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Monarch Cottages La Jolla accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Monarch Cottages La Jolla is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

17 of 52 beds occupied (33%) when the state visited on March 11, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Monarch Cottages La Jolla?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 13 state visits and 10 dated documents since 2023 for Monarch Cottages La Jolla; 6 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated March 11, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

6 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewed- Staff did not provide two-person assist for resident transfer.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Becky Kennedy conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to deliver findings on the above . LPA was granted entry to the facility and met with Risa Jester, Executive Director, after identifying herself and explaining the reason for the visit. The Department’s investigation consisted of review of facility records, outside source records, and interviews of facility staff and outside sources. It was alleged that facility staff did not provide two-person assist for resident transfer. A review of facility records revealed thar Staff 1 (S1) did transfer Resident 1 (R1) without assistance. R1’s care plan requires a two-person transfer for the safety of R1 and staff members. The allegation is therefore Substantiated, and one (1) deficiency was cited for it per California Code of Regulations, Title 22 (refer to the attached LIC 9099-D page). A Plan of Correction was jointly developed with the Licensee. An exit interview was conducted with Risa JesterCDSS inspection report, March 11, 2026 · control 08-AS-20210728124213
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not meet resident's hygiene needs.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Becky Kennedy conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to the facility to deliver findings regarding the above allegation. LPA was granted entry to the facility after identifying herself. LPA met with Karen Moran, LVN Cognitive Entrenchment Director and explained the reason for the visit. The Department’s investigation consisted of LPA observations, a review of facility and outside source records, and interviews of internal and outside sources. It was alleged that the facility did not meet resident's hygiene needs. Specifically, that the facility did not provide for or arrange for proper foot care resulting in Resident 1’s (R1) toenails being uncut and grown significantly beyond the ends of R1’s toes. The investigation determined through interviews and a review of internal and external documents that at the time of R1’s admission to the facility consent was given for R1 to receive podiatry care from an outside provider. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 12, 2026 · control 08-AS-20210402112310

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff handled resident in a rough manner. Staff did not respond timely to resident’s call button. Facility did not provide adequate incontinence care for resident.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Becky Kennedy conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to the facility to deliver findings regarding the above allegations. LPA was granted entry to the facility after identifying herself. LPA met with Risa Jester, Executive Director and explained the reason for the visit. The Department’s investigation consisted of LPA observations, a review of facility and outside source records, and interviews of internal and outside sources. It was alleged that staff handled Resident 1 (R1) in a rough manner. The allegation was that a staff member pulled an item from a resident’s hand. There was no specific object identified in the allegation. Interviews with internal and external sources did not reveal any confirming evidence that R1 or any other resident was treated in a rough manner. This allegation is Unsubstantiated. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 29, 2025 · control 08-AS-20210913092229
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not seek medical attention for resident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Arian Golbakhsh and Iby Strong conducted an unannounced visit to open a complaint investigation and delivered findings regarding the above mentioned allegation. LPAs were welcomed by, identified themselves to, and discussed the purpose of their visit to Executive Director Risa Jester. On 05/27/2025, the Department received a complaint allegation where it was alleged that a resident at the facility identified as (R1) sustained a fall and did not receive medical care. No timeline was provided in the complaint regarding when R1 had fallen. The Department’s investigation consisted of an unannounced facility visit, records review, and interviews with staff, residents, and outside sources. [Continued on LIC 9099-C] UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, June 4, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250527152121
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedNeglect/Lack of Supervision resulted in resident sustaining serious injury.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Iby Strong and Arian Golbakhsh conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings in the above-mentioned allegation. LPAs met with Executive Director RIsa Jester and discussed the purpose of the visit. On June 13, 2023, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging neglect/lack of supervision resulted in Resident 1 (R1) (R1 – see LIC811 Confidential Names List) sustaining serious injuries. According to R1’s Physician Report, R1 is diagnosed with a major neurocognitive disorder, is non-ambulatory, and has motor impairment/paralysis. R1’s Needs and Services Plan states R1 is a total assist with activities of daily living and a two person assist with bathing, washing and toileting. During investigation, the Department collected pertinent resident records as well as facility documentation and conducted interviews. According to the allegation, on an undisclosed date in May of 2023, R1 was being transported and dropped by an unknown sCDSS inspection report, June 4, 2025 · control 08-AS-20230613182530
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not follow infection control procedures
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sabel Martinez conducted an unannounced a follow up complaint investigation visit, and delivered complaint findings. The LPA introduced himself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Congnitive Enrichment Director Alicia Prichard. Throughout the investigation, the Department secured records and conducted interviews with external and internal sources. It was alleged staff did not follow infection control procedures. On 8/23/2024 it was reported to the Department Resident # 1 (R1) was diagnosed with an infectious disease and the facility was not following infection control procedures. Interviews with both internal and external sources confirmed R1 was diagnosed with Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 28, 2025 · control 08-AS-20240823095237

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 13 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
1
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
2
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
3
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
6
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
13
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(858) 924-8530
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Monarch Cottages La Jolla? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.