Cedars @ Paradise Village is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in National City, San Diego County, California — state license #374602869, licensed for 150 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 21 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated January 9, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

6 homes in view

Cedars @ Paradise Village

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 150 residents · National City, CA · San Diego County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceMemory care not on fileBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #374602869, held since 2009 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
2740 E 4th Street · National City, San Diego County
Phone
(619) 475-5040
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryVerified in record
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careVerified in record
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
FACILITY SERVES ONE HUNDRED FIFTY (150) ELDERLY RESIDENTS, ALL OF WHOM MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR SIX (6) RESIDENTS.State service designation985 - RCFE / HOSPICEthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 21 times and filed 21 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated January 9, 2026.

Most recent state visit
January 9, 2026
Occupancy at the August 28, 2025 visit
103 of 150 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 9 documents with transcribed findings, dated April 27, 2022 to August 28, 2025. 9 of the 9 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2), “Unfounded” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (5). 9 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 9 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 11 of 21 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20261 state visit · 1 document
Jan 9, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20253 state visits · 3 documents
Oct 23, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 28, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff financially abused resident in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rebecca Borunda conducted an unannounced complaint visit to open an investigation and deliver findings regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA identified herself to, was greeted by, and explained the purpose of the visit to Executive Director Nicole Long and Senior Executive Director William "Bill" Lawson. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews with facility management, record review, and a tour of the facility. It was alleged that staff financially abused Resident 1 (R1). Observation of the facility on 8/28/2025 revealed that the licensed assisted living facility is part of a larger campus that contains multiple buildings, which facility management stated were buildings for independent living. Review of the Department's licensing database and interviews with facility managment revealed that the independent living buildings are not licensed by the Department and have separate addresses from the licensed assisted living facility. Conthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 28, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250826160820
Jul 14, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility had insufficient staff to meet the needs of hospice residents

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ramon Serrano conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA met with Executive Director Nicole Long and we discussed the purpose of the visit and elements of the complaint. Community Care Licensing (CCL) has investigated the above allegation. The investigation consisted of LPA observation, records review, interviews with staff and outside sources. It was alleged that the facility had insufficient staff to meet the needs of the hospice residents. It was reported that Resident 1 (R1), Resident 2 (R2) and Resident 3 (R3) were on hospice with doctor's orders to be turned every two hours. It was also reported that due to staff shortage the residents were not being turned or checked on as required. LPA interviewed outside agency 1 (OA1) who stated that they work directly with R1 and R2 on a regular basis at the facility. OA1 stated that they met with the facility staff regarding R1's care needs after some initial issthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 14, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250512104036
20243 state visits · 4 documents
Nov 14, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 30, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 30, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 6, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20233 state visits · 3 documents
Dec 21, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not employ sufficient care staff to meet the needs of residents Licensee did not employ sufficient food service personnel to meet the needs of residents

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ramon Serrano conducted an unannounced visit to deliver investigative findings. LPA was granted entry into the facility and met with Executive Director Bill Lawson, to whom LPA explained the purpose of the visit. Community Care Licensing (CCL) has investigated the above listed complaint allegations. The investigation consisted of LPA interviews and review of records. It was alleged that Licensee did not employ sufficient care staff to meet the needs of residents. It was also reported that Licensee did not employ sufficient food service personnel to meet the needs of residents. Interview with Staff 1 (S1) revealed hey had been working at the facility since February 2020. S1 stated that the facility had a staffing issue and that it was generally worse in the morning shifts. S1 stated that it wasn't possible to respond quickly to pendant calls because their were just too many pendant calls and not enough staff. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 21, 2023 · control 08-AS-20200901121601
Oct 30, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 26, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility does not have sufficient staff to meet the needs of the residents. Unqualified staff are providing care to residents. Due to lack of sufficient staff, residents are made to wait an excessive amount of time for assistance, Staff does not maintain facility clean and sanitary. Facility staff does not maintain residents' rooms free of odors. Facility staff are not meeting residents' laundering needs. Facility staff are not providing residents food and water at night. Facility staff are not accurately maintaining residents' records.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Renita Hall conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings. LPA was allowed entry by Katrina Jimenez, Resident Services Director. LPA identified herself and disclosed the purpose of the visit and elements of the findings with the Resident Services Director. The Department investigated the above complaint allegations. The investigation consisted of a tour of the facility, interview with staff, residents, and records review. On January 4, 2023 a complaint was received alleging several accounts of negligence and inadequate staffing at Cedars @ Paradise Village. The complainant stated that the facility does not have sufficient staff to meet the needs of the residents, resulting in unqualified staff providing care. Additionally, residents are made to wait an excessive amount of time for assistance due to the lack of sufficient staff. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 26, 2023 · control 08-AS-20230104140228
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 1
Type B citations2typical 1
Substantiated complaints2typical 2
Total complaints8typical 7
State visits on file21typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2009.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202611020253302024340202355020225522021330
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — San Diego County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2022 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (619) 475-5040

Is Cedars @ Paradise Village licensed?

Yes — Cedars @ Paradise Village is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in National City (San Diego County): California license #374602869, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 150 residents. State records list 21 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated January 9, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Cedars @ Paradise Village care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Cedars @ Paradise Village with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and hospice care; it does not list dementia / memory care and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordFACILITY SERVES ONE HUNDRED FIFTY (150) ELDERLY RESIDENTS, ALL OF WHOM MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR SIX (6) RESIDENTS.

How much does Cedars @ Paradise Village cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Cedars @ Paradise Village's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Diego County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Cedars @ Paradise Village accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Cedars @ Paradise Village is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

103 of 150 beds occupied (69%) when the state visited on August 28, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Cedars @ Paradise Village?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 21 state visits and 21 dated documents since 2021 for Cedars @ Paradise Village; 9 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated August 28, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unfounded. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

9 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff financially abused resident in care
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rebecca Borunda conducted an unannounced complaint visit to open an investigation and deliver findings regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA identified herself to, was greeted by, and explained the purpose of the visit to Executive Director Nicole Long and Senior Executive Director William "Bill" Lawson. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews with facility management, record review, and a tour of the facility. It was alleged that staff financially abused Resident 1 (R1). Observation of the facility on 8/28/2025 revealed that the licensed assisted living facility is part of a larger campus that contains multiple buildings, which facility management stated were buildings for independent living. Review of the Department's licensing database and interviews with facility managment revealed that the independent living buildings are not licensed by the Department and have separate addresses from the licensed assisted living facility. ConCDSS inspection report, August 28, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250826160820
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility had insufficient staff to meet the needs of hospice residents
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ramon Serrano conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA met with Executive Director Nicole Long and we discussed the purpose of the visit and elements of the complaint. Community Care Licensing (CCL) has investigated the above allegation. The investigation consisted of LPA observation, records review, interviews with staff and outside sources. It was alleged that the facility had insufficient staff to meet the needs of the hospice residents. It was reported that Resident 1 (R1), Resident 2 (R2) and Resident 3 (R3) were on hospice with doctor's orders to be turned every two hours. It was also reported that due to staff shortage the residents were not being turned or checked on as required. LPA interviewed outside agency 1 (OA1) who stated that they work directly with R1 and R2 on a regular basis at the facility. OA1 stated that they met with the facility staff regarding R1's care needs after some initial issCDSS inspection report, July 14, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250512104036

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee did not employ sufficient care staff to meet the needs of residents Licensee did not employ sufficient food service personnel to meet the needs of residents
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ramon Serrano conducted an unannounced visit to deliver investigative findings. LPA was granted entry into the facility and met with Executive Director Bill Lawson, to whom LPA explained the purpose of the visit. Community Care Licensing (CCL) has investigated the above listed complaint allegations. The investigation consisted of LPA interviews and review of records. It was alleged that Licensee did not employ sufficient care staff to meet the needs of residents. It was also reported that Licensee did not employ sufficient food service personnel to meet the needs of residents. Interview with Staff 1 (S1) revealed hey had been working at the facility since February 2020. S1 stated that the facility had a staffing issue and that it was generally worse in the morning shifts. S1 stated that it wasn't possible to respond quickly to pendant calls because their were just too many pendant calls and not enough staff. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 21, 2023 · control 08-AS-20200901121601
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility does not have sufficient staff to meet the needs of the residents. Unqualified staff are providing care to residents. Due to lack of sufficient staff, residents are made to wait an excessive amount of time for assistance, Staff does not maintain facility clean and sanitary. Facility staff does not maintain residents' rooms free of odors. Facility staff are not meeting residents' laundering needs. Facility staff are not providing residents food and water at night. Facility staff are not accurately maintaining residents' records.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Renita Hall conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings. LPA was allowed entry by Katrina Jimenez, Resident Services Director. LPA identified herself and disclosed the purpose of the visit and elements of the findings with the Resident Services Director. The Department investigated the above complaint allegations. The investigation consisted of a tour of the facility, interview with staff, residents, and records review. On January 4, 2023 a complaint was received alleging several accounts of negligence and inadequate staffing at Cedars @ Paradise Village. The complainant stated that the facility does not have sufficient staff to meet the needs of the residents, resulting in unqualified staff providing care. Additionally, residents are made to wait an excessive amount of time for assistance due to the lack of sufficient staff. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 26, 2023 · control 08-AS-20230104140228
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not treat resident with dignity
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rebecca Ruiz conducted an unannounced complaint visit to conduct follow-up and deliver findings regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA identified herself to, was greeted by, and explained the purpose of the visit to Senior Executive Director Bill Lawson. LPA also met with Resident Care Coordinator Sheryll Chicano. During today's visit, LPA toured the facility and interviewed staff and residents. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews with residents and staff, records review, and a tour of the facility. It was alleged that facility staff did not treat resident with dignity. Interviews revealed that Resident 1 (R1) required assistance with bathing. In June 2020, Staff 1 (S1) assisted R1 during a shower and R1 believed that S1 had unintentionally treated them roughly. Continued on LIC9099-C page... UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 3, 2023 · control 08-AS-20200618160126
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is not following Covid 19 infection control requirements Facility is not following Covid 19 reporting requirements
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Domingo conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings to the above mentioned complaint allegations. LPA Domingo identified herself and discussed the purpose of the visit with Administrator Nicole Long. The Department’s investigation consisted of client and outside sources records review, interviews with staff and outside sources. It was alleged that the facility was not following COVID-19 infection control and reporting requirements. Resident #1 (R1) tested positive for COVID-19 while at the hospital. Upon R1’s return to the facility an outside source #1 (OS1) reported that the facility did not inform the staff, visitors and other residents of R1’s newly diagnosed positive COVID-19 test result. (Continue on LIC9099C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 22, 2023 · control 08-AS-20220928104114

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee employed a staff lacking criminal record clearance.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Dang Nguyen conducted an unannounced subsequent visit to deliver a finding regarding the above prior complaint allegation. LPA was welcomed by and identified himself to Receptionist Ashley Farfan-Garcia. LPA then met with and discussed the purpose of the visit with Executive Director Nicole Long. It was alleged licensee employed Staff #1 (S1) at the facility, despite S1 lacking the required criminal record clearance to work there. The Department’s investigation involved an unannounced facility tour, interviews of relevant staff, and a review of S1’s personnel file and CCLD’s Licensing Information System (LIS) database. [CONTINUED ON LIC 9099-C] UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, October 17, 2022 · control 08-AS-20220831124847
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee did not give resident medication(s) as prescribed.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Dang Nguyen conducted an unannounced subsequent visit to deliver a finding regarding the above prior complaint allegation. LPA was welcomed by, identified himself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Executive Director Nicole Long and Resident Service Director Katrina Jimenez. It was alleged that licensee assisted Resident #1 (R1) with their normally prescribed medications, but between July 27, 2022 and July 29, 2022, two specific medications were handed to R1 in amounts less than what was specified/required by their signed physician’s order (an order which was received and acknowledged by licensee' staff on the date it was to take effect). [See attached LIC811 Confidential Names List for a description of person identifiers used in this report]. CCLD’s investigation involved interviews of pertinent residents, facility staff, and outside sources. The Department also reviewed administrative, care, and medication records from R1’s file, plus releCDSS inspection report, August 31, 2022 · control 08-AS-20220816115653
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff Financially abused resident
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marisela Garcia-Centeno conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit at the facility. LPA was greeted at the front entrance by Staff Priscilla Oseguera, and granted entry after identifying herself. LPA met with Administrator, Nithi Narasappa and explained the purpose of the visit was to deliver findings for the above allegation. The Department’s investigation consisted of multiple interviews with facility staff, outside sources and records review, including bank statements, law enforcement reports and other relevant documents pertinent to this investigation. On March 22, 2022, a complaint was filed with Community Care Licensing with the allegation involving financial abuse of a resident by staff member. It was reported that Staff (S1) financially abused Resident (R1) by altering a $100 check draft issued on February 13, 2022, to S1. Administrator was provided with Confidential Names Form (LIC 811) in order to identify R1 and S1. It was allegedCDSS inspection report, April 27, 2022 · control 08-AS-20220322144630

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 21 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
2
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
2
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
8
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
21
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(619) 475-5040
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Cedars @ Paradise Village? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.