Golden Living Health Management, Inc. is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in San Diego, San Diego County, California — state license #374602369, licensed for 113 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 85 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated March 23, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

1 home in view

Golden Living Health Management, Inc.

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 113 residents · San Diego, CA · San Diego County
LicensedMemory careHospiceBedriddenWheelchair not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #374602369, held since 2007 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
3223 Duke Street · San Diego, San Diego County
Phone
(619) 222-1109
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryNot on file — ask the home
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 8 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 1 resident

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
THE FACILITY SERVES ONE-HUNDRED AND THIRTEEN (113) NON-AMBULTORY ELDERLY RESIDENTS; AGES 60 AND ABOVE; ONE OF WHICH MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR EIGHT (8) RESIDENTS.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 94 times and filed 85 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated March 23, 2026.

Most recent state visit
July 7, 2026
Occupancy at the March 19, 2024 visit
88 of 113 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 25 documents with transcribed findings, dated May 18, 2022 to March 19, 2024. 25 of the 25 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (9), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (15). 25 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 25 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 59 of 85 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20267 state visits · 10 documents
Mar 23, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 21, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 3, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 3, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 29, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 29, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 20, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 16, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 16, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 14, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

202512 state visits · 18 documents
Dec 17, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 13, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 5, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 17, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 1, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 17, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 17, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 5, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 5, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 23, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 21, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 21, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 6, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 17, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 8, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 8, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 8, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 8, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

202419 state visits · 28 documents
Dec 18, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 7, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 17, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 17, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 26, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 23, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 20, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 20, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 11, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 26, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 19, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 19, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 2, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 2, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 2, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 18, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 18, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 2, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 2, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 19, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Lack of supervision resulted in resident altercation Staff verbally abused resident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Natasha Persaud conducted a complaint investigation regarding the above-mentioned allegations. LPA met with Administrator, Rocio Granda, However, she had to tend to an urgent matter. Therefore, Medication Technician, Andrea Rodriguez completed he visit with LPA. During the investigation, the facility was briefly toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff and residents. It was alleged lack of supervision resulted in a resident altercation. It was reported Resident #1 (R1) was asleep in their room when Resident #2 (R2) came into R1’s room and hit R1, while they were asleep. R1’s interview revealed that R1 used to live in a shared room with R2 when the altercation occurred back in November 2023. Today, R1 expressed they were not concerned about the previous altercation because the facility acted appropriately, and the police were contacted. R1 did not press charges or sustain any injuries. LPA confirmed R1 has resided in a private room fothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 19, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240312090659
Feb 29, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not respond timely to assist resident. Illegal eviction.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Liliana Silveira conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit. LPA Silveira introduced themselves, met with Administrator Rocio Granda and disclosed the purpose of the visit. The purpose of the visit was to deliver complaint findings for the above-mentioned allegations. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews with staff, residents and outside sources, as well as a facility records review. It was alleged that the facility attempted to evict Resident #1 (R1) illegally. It was also alleged that staff did not respond timely to assist R1. In an interview conducted with an outside source on 10/21/2020, it was alleged that facility management illegally evicted R1. An interview conducted by the Department with the current Administrator revealed that R1 was never evicted and actually continued to reside in the facility up until 2023. [CONTINUED 9099-C] Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 29, 2024 · control 08-AS-20201016163901
Feb 28, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility did not refill prescriptions in a timely manner Licensee did not arrange transportation services to meet resident's needs Facility staff was not able to communicate with residents and/or emergency service personnel

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rebecca Ruiz conducted an unannounced complaint visit to conduct follow-up and deliver findings regarding the above-mentioned allegations. LPA identified herself to, was greeted by, and explained the purpose of the visit to Administrator Rocio Granda. During today's visit, LPA observed residents in care, reviewed and obtained copies of facility records, and interviewed staff. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews with residents, staff, and outside sources, record review, and a tour of the facility. It was alleged that the facility did not refill prescriptions in a timely manner, the Licensee did not arrange transportation services to meet resident needs, and facility staff was not able to communicate with residents and/or emergency personnel. Continued on LIC9099-C page... Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 28, 2024 · control 08-AS-20201007102549
Feb 28, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 26, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not administer medications as prescribed

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marisela Garcia-Centeno conducted an unannounced visit to commence a complaint investigation and delivered findings. LPA identified herself and discussed the allegation mentioned above with Administrator, Rocio Granda. On February 20, 2024, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging that facility staff did not administer medications to R1 as prescribed, [an LIC 811 Confidential Names List was provided to staff to identify the resident]. It was specifically alleged that staff did not administer the Nortriptyline, 50 ml according to the physician's orders. Per the physician's orders, R1 was to be administered one capsule for anxiety and depression daily before bedtime. A review of the physician's notes indicated that on February 18, 2024, when R1 was admitted to the hospital, (due to an unrelated condition), R1 had not been administered the medication. A review of the physician's notes indicated that the facility had run out of the Nortrithe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 26, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240220113601
Feb 23, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff failed to reposition resident. Facility did not maintain resident's room temperature within regulation.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to conduct interviews, collect records, and deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegations. LPA introduced herself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Mina Ramirez, Caregiving Supervisor. On 10/6/2020 it was alleged that facility staff failed to reposition a resident, and did not maintain a resident's room temperature within regulation. The Department’s investigation consisted of a virtual and unannounced facility visit, interviews with facility staff, outside sources, records review, and LPA direct observations. Regarding the allegation, "Facility staff failed to reposition resident", it was alleged that Resident 1 (R1) suffered pressure wounds due to staff not turning them in regular intervals. Staff interview revealed that R1's condition rose to a level of care that the Licensee could no longer provide; the issue was elevated to management for R1 to receive a higher level of care. Staffthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 23, 2024 · control 08-AS-20201006111840
Feb 23, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 21, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Residents were financially abused while in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit regarding the above-mentioned allegations. LPA met with Medication Technician Supervisor, Yahaira Garduno. It was alleged residents were being financially abused while in care. Resident #1 (R1) and Resident #2 (R2) were the alleged victims. It was reported R1’s fanny pack, wallet, Identification card and $400 was stolen. R1 wears a key around their neck, which is for a lock to their drawer in their bedroom. R1 reported someone took the key off their neck and stole their items in the locked drawer. LPA observed R1’s fanny pack sitting on their table in their room. R1 opened their fanny pack, and their wallet was located inside the fanny pack. In addition, R1’s locked drawer also contained another wallet that R1 claimed was also stolen. R1 was unable to state having possession of the fanny pack and wallets, that were allegedly stolen. R1 was unable to locate the $400 or provide proof they had possession of ththe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 21, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240214155043
Feb 8, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff not providing adequate service to resident in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tiffany Holmes conducted an unannounced visit to close out a complaint. LPA identified herself, was granted entry, and stated the purpose of the visit to Rocio Granda, Administrator. During the investigation, LPA toured the facility, conducted interviews and completed a records review. It was alleged that staff are not providing adequate service to resident in care. Interviews revealed staff provide several services to the residents. Services include cleaning the rooms, assisting residents when they need assistance and showering along with other duties as deemed necessary as requested by the residents. Interviews with staff denied not providing services to residents. Interviews revealed that the staff assist residents when the residents need help they let the staff know. Staff do rounds and check on the residents so they can meet their needs. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 8, 2024 · control 08-AS-20220728101558
20233 state visits · 3 documents
Oct 30, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff mishandles resident's medication. Staff did not provide a comfortable room temperature for resident. Facility is in disrepair. Facility is not free of insects. Facility does not provide adequate food service for resident. Resident's room does not have sufficient lighting.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Domingo conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver investigative findings. LPA identified herself and was invited into the facility. LPA met with Administrator, Rocio Granda and Yahaira Garduno Med Tech Supervisor and shared findings. The Department investigated the above-listed complaint allegations. The investigation consisted of an inspection of the facility, interviews with staff and outside sources, and a review of resident and facility records relevant to this investigation. On August 13, 2020 Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging that facility staff mishandles resident's medication. Resident 1 (R1) records were reviewed and there were no discrepancies or mishandling of medication. Resident 2 (R2) records were reviewed and there were no discrepancies or mishandling of medication. Resident 3 (R3) records were reviewed and there were no discrepancies or mishandling of medication. Outside Source 1 (OS1) was interviethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 30, 2023 · control 08-AS-20200813143233
Sep 20, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: -Resident medications not given as prescribed -Resident had accessibility to items that pose a danger

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit to conclude the complaint investigation regarding the above-mentioned allegations. LPA met with Business Office Assistant, Ruth Granda. During the investigation, the facility was briefly toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff and outside sources. It was reported medications were not given as prescribed for two residents, Resident #1 (R1) and Resident #2 (R2). Interviews with facility staff confirmed the facility managed R1 and R2’s medications. It was reported R1’s medications were not being taken and found stored in R1’s drawer by R1. Staff interviews revealed not being aware of any medications in R1’s possession. R1’s Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 06/01/21-07/04/21 reflected staff signatures for all dates, which indicated the medications were dispensed. Staff interviews revealed R1 was alert and able to ask for medications and request refills, there were no medicationthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 20, 2023 · control 08-AS-20211103150253
Aug 16, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility telephone is in disrepair

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit to commence a complaint investigation. LPA identified herself and discussed the allegation mentioned above with Administrator, Rocio Granda. During today's visit, LPA briefly toured the facility and interviewed staff. It was alleged the facility telephone is not operable at night time, after business hours. A voicemail comes on that states the voicemail has not been set up. Therefore, a message cannot be left and no staff or resident can be reached. Per the Administrator, they use Verizon for phone/internet services. Verizon was contacted and the facility is working on having the telephone calls operating for 24 hours. Administrator stated Verizon had the phones working during business hours only. Now the phones will operate 24 hours and monitored by a staff member, who will check the voicemail's hourly. As of today, the phone issue is still being worked on with Verizon. The facility admitted there has beenthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 16, 2023 · control 08-AS-20230807171754
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations9typical 1
Type B citations11typical 1
Substantiated complaints20typical 2
Total complaints52typical 7
State visits on file94typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2007.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20267100202512180202419281202391132022121652021220
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — San Diego County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home is on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Ask how the 2024 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (619) 222-1109

Is Golden Living Health Management, Inc. licensed?

Yes — Golden Living Health Management, Inc. is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in San Diego (San Diego County): California license #374602369, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 113 residents. State records list 85 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated March 23, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Golden Living Health Management, Inc. care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Golden Living Health Management, Inc. with clearances for dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list wheelchair / non-ambulatory. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordTHE FACILITY SERVES ONE-HUNDRED AND THIRTEEN (113) NON-AMBULTORY ELDERLY RESIDENTS; AGES 60 AND ABOVE; ONE OF WHICH MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR EIGHT (8) RESIDENTS.

How much does Golden Living Health Management, Inc. cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Golden Living Health Management, Inc.'s monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Diego County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Golden Living Health Management, Inc. accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Golden Living Health Management, Inc. through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.

Medi-Cal / ALW homes in San Diego County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

88 of 113 beds occupied (78%) when the state visited on March 19, 2024. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Golden Living Health Management, Inc.?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 94 state visits and 85 dated documents since 2021 for Golden Living Health Management, Inc.; 25 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated March 19, 2024, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

25 transcribed reports on file

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLack of supervision resulted in resident altercation Staff verbally abused resident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Natasha Persaud conducted a complaint investigation regarding the above-mentioned allegations. LPA met with Administrator, Rocio Granda, However, she had to tend to an urgent matter. Therefore, Medication Technician, Andrea Rodriguez completed he visit with LPA. During the investigation, the facility was briefly toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff and residents. It was alleged lack of supervision resulted in a resident altercation. It was reported Resident #1 (R1) was asleep in their room when Resident #2 (R2) came into R1’s room and hit R1, while they were asleep. R1’s interview revealed that R1 used to live in a shared room with R2 when the altercation occurred back in November 2023. Today, R1 expressed they were not concerned about the previous altercation because the facility acted appropriately, and the police were contacted. R1 did not press charges or sustain any injuries. LPA confirmed R1 has resided in a private room foCDSS inspection report, March 19, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240312090659
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not respond timely to assist resident. Illegal eviction.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Liliana Silveira conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit. LPA Silveira introduced themselves, met with Administrator Rocio Granda and disclosed the purpose of the visit. The purpose of the visit was to deliver complaint findings for the above-mentioned allegations. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews with staff, residents and outside sources, as well as a facility records review. It was alleged that the facility attempted to evict Resident #1 (R1) illegally. It was also alleged that staff did not respond timely to assist R1. In an interview conducted with an outside source on 10/21/2020, it was alleged that facility management illegally evicted R1. An interview conducted by the Department with the current Administrator revealed that R1 was never evicted and actually continued to reside in the facility up until 2023. [CONTINUED 9099-C] UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 29, 2024 · control 08-AS-20201016163901
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not refill prescriptions in a timely manner Licensee did not arrange transportation services to meet resident's needs Facility staff was not able to communicate with residents and/or emergency service personnel
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rebecca Ruiz conducted an unannounced complaint visit to conduct follow-up and deliver findings regarding the above-mentioned allegations. LPA identified herself to, was greeted by, and explained the purpose of the visit to Administrator Rocio Granda. During today's visit, LPA observed residents in care, reviewed and obtained copies of facility records, and interviewed staff. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews with residents, staff, and outside sources, record review, and a tour of the facility. It was alleged that the facility did not refill prescriptions in a timely manner, the Licensee did not arrange transportation services to meet resident needs, and facility staff was not able to communicate with residents and/or emergency personnel. Continued on LIC9099-C page... UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 28, 2024 · control 08-AS-20201007102549
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not administer medications as prescribed
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marisela Garcia-Centeno conducted an unannounced visit to commence a complaint investigation and delivered findings. LPA identified herself and discussed the allegation mentioned above with Administrator, Rocio Granda. On February 20, 2024, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging that facility staff did not administer medications to R1 as prescribed, [an LIC 811 Confidential Names List was provided to staff to identify the resident]. It was specifically alleged that staff did not administer the Nortriptyline, 50 ml according to the physician's orders. Per the physician's orders, R1 was to be administered one capsule for anxiety and depression daily before bedtime. A review of the physician's notes indicated that on February 18, 2024, when R1 was admitted to the hospital, (due to an unrelated condition), R1 had not been administered the medication. A review of the physician's notes indicated that the facility had run out of the NortriCDSS inspection report, February 26, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240220113601
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff failed to reposition resident. Facility did not maintain resident's room temperature within regulation.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to conduct interviews, collect records, and deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegations. LPA introduced herself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Mina Ramirez, Caregiving Supervisor. On 10/6/2020 it was alleged that facility staff failed to reposition a resident, and did not maintain a resident's room temperature within regulation. The Department’s investigation consisted of a virtual and unannounced facility visit, interviews with facility staff, outside sources, records review, and LPA direct observations. Regarding the allegation, "Facility staff failed to reposition resident", it was alleged that Resident 1 (R1) suffered pressure wounds due to staff not turning them in regular intervals. Staff interview revealed that R1's condition rose to a level of care that the Licensee could no longer provide; the issue was elevated to management for R1 to receive a higher level of care. StaffCDSS inspection report, February 23, 2024 · control 08-AS-20201006111840
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResidents were financially abused while in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit regarding the above-mentioned allegations. LPA met with Medication Technician Supervisor, Yahaira Garduno. It was alleged residents were being financially abused while in care. Resident #1 (R1) and Resident #2 (R2) were the alleged victims. It was reported R1’s fanny pack, wallet, Identification card and $400 was stolen. R1 wears a key around their neck, which is for a lock to their drawer in their bedroom. R1 reported someone took the key off their neck and stole their items in the locked drawer. LPA observed R1’s fanny pack sitting on their table in their room. R1 opened their fanny pack, and their wallet was located inside the fanny pack. In addition, R1’s locked drawer also contained another wallet that R1 claimed was also stolen. R1 was unable to state having possession of the fanny pack and wallets, that were allegedly stolen. R1 was unable to locate the $400 or provide proof they had possession of thCDSS inspection report, February 21, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240214155043
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff not providing adequate service to resident in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tiffany Holmes conducted an unannounced visit to close out a complaint. LPA identified herself, was granted entry, and stated the purpose of the visit to Rocio Granda, Administrator. During the investigation, LPA toured the facility, conducted interviews and completed a records review. It was alleged that staff are not providing adequate service to resident in care. Interviews revealed staff provide several services to the residents. Services include cleaning the rooms, assisting residents when they need assistance and showering along with other duties as deemed necessary as requested by the residents. Interviews with staff denied not providing services to residents. Interviews revealed that the staff assist residents when the residents need help they let the staff know. Staff do rounds and check on the residents so they can meet their needs. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 8, 2024 · control 08-AS-20220728101558

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff mishandles resident's medication. Staff did not provide a comfortable room temperature for resident. Facility is in disrepair. Facility is not free of insects. Facility does not provide adequate food service for resident. Resident's room does not have sufficient lighting.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Domingo conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver investigative findings. LPA identified herself and was invited into the facility. LPA met with Administrator, Rocio Granda and Yahaira Garduno Med Tech Supervisor and shared findings. The Department investigated the above-listed complaint allegations. The investigation consisted of an inspection of the facility, interviews with staff and outside sources, and a review of resident and facility records relevant to this investigation. On August 13, 2020 Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging that facility staff mishandles resident's medication. Resident 1 (R1) records were reviewed and there were no discrepancies or mishandling of medication. Resident 2 (R2) records were reviewed and there were no discrepancies or mishandling of medication. Resident 3 (R3) records were reviewed and there were no discrepancies or mishandling of medication. Outside Source 1 (OS1) was intervieCDSS inspection report, October 30, 2023 · control 08-AS-20200813143233
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewed-Resident medications not given as prescribed -Resident had accessibility to items that pose a danger
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit to conclude the complaint investigation regarding the above-mentioned allegations. LPA met with Business Office Assistant, Ruth Granda. During the investigation, the facility was briefly toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff and outside sources. It was reported medications were not given as prescribed for two residents, Resident #1 (R1) and Resident #2 (R2). Interviews with facility staff confirmed the facility managed R1 and R2’s medications. It was reported R1’s medications were not being taken and found stored in R1’s drawer by R1. Staff interviews revealed not being aware of any medications in R1’s possession. R1’s Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 06/01/21-07/04/21 reflected staff signatures for all dates, which indicated the medications were dispensed. Staff interviews revealed R1 was alert and able to ask for medications and request refills, there were no medicationCDSS inspection report, September 20, 2023 · control 08-AS-20211103150253
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility telephone is in disrepair
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit to commence a complaint investigation. LPA identified herself and discussed the allegation mentioned above with Administrator, Rocio Granda. During today's visit, LPA briefly toured the facility and interviewed staff. It was alleged the facility telephone is not operable at night time, after business hours. A voicemail comes on that states the voicemail has not been set up. Therefore, a message cannot be left and no staff or resident can be reached. Per the Administrator, they use Verizon for phone/internet services. Verizon was contacted and the facility is working on having the telephone calls operating for 24 hours. Administrator stated Verizon had the phones working during business hours only. Now the phones will operate 24 hours and monitored by a staff member, who will check the voicemail's hourly. As of today, the phone issue is still being worked on with Verizon. The facility admitted there has beenCDSS inspection report, August 16, 2023 · control 08-AS-20230807171754
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not provide adequate food service Staff did not meet residents’ care needs Staff did not provide incontinence care for resident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Garcia-Centeno conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver investigative findings. LPA identified herself and was invited into the facility. LPA met with Administrator, Rocio Granda and shared findings. The Department investigated the above-listed complaint allegations. The investigation consisted of an inspection of the facility, interviews with staff and outside sources, and a review of resident and facility records relevant to this investigation. On March 22, 2023, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging that facility staff did not provide adequate food service. It was specifically alleged that there was a shortage of food and sometimes no food. In addition, it was alleged that residents could only have two cups of milk or coffee. (continue on LIC9099C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 26, 2023 · control 08-AS-20230322151605
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed-Resident developed multiple pressure injuries while in care due to neglect -Facility staff did not arrange medical care -Facility staff did not observe change in the resident's condition
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit regarding the above mentioned allegations. LPA met with Administrator, Rocio Granda. During the investigation, the facility was toured, records requested, and interviews conducted with staff, residents, and outside sources. It was alleged Resident #1 (R1) developed multiple pressure injuries while in care due to neglect on or around 04/2021. R1’s Physician's Report dated 07/14/2020 indicated a special diet of Controlled Carbohydrate diet for diabetes; Bladder impairment; History of skin breakdown of rashes; Ambulatory and Independent with transfers. R1’s Physician’s Report dated 11/09/21 indicated a history of skin breakdown to bilateral posterior thighs, venous stasis ulcers. It also reflected R1 was non-ambulatory, in fair health status and able to feed and toilet themselves as well as handle their own cash resources. R1 did not have pressure injuries, they had venous stasis wounds. Continued on an LIC 90CDSS inspection report, July 21, 2023 · control 08-AS-20210407085800
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is not following COVID-19 guidelines
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud concluded the complaint investigation regarding the above mentioned allegation. LPA met with Business Manager, Monica Cordoba. During the investigation, the facility was briefly toured, records requested, and interviews conducted with staff and outside sources. It was alleged, the facility was not following Covid-19 guidelines. It was reported the facility did not notify a visitor that came into contact with a resident that contracted Covid-19. Outside source interviews revealed on 06/27/22, a family member visited Resident #1 (R1) at the facility. On 06/29/22, R1 was not feeling well and presented with a fever. Therefore, the facility contacted 911 and had R1 transported to the hospital. R1 was diagnosed at the hospital with Covid-19 on 06/29/22. The administrator’s interview revealed R1 did not present with symptoms prior to 06/29/22. The administrator confirmed notifying R1’s responsible party that R1 was Covid-19 positive as outlinedCDSS inspection report, April 5, 2023 · control 08-AS-20220701092311
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee did not meet the needs of a resident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud concluded the complaint investigation regarding the above mentioned allegation. LPA met with Business Manager, Monica Cordoba. During the investigation, the facility was toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff, resident, and outside sources. It was reported Resident #1’s (R1) needs are not being met regarding their medical care. R1 has been making statements they were going to die. R1 resided in the memory care unit and was able to handle some of their activities of daily living, with reminders. R1’s spouse/responsible party confirmed R1 had no plans to end their life, had no means to end their life, and would not hurt themselves in any way. R1’s spouse/responsible party also indicated R1 does not express suicidal ideations. R1’s Physician’s Report dated 06/02/21 indicated R1 was ambulatory and able to self-care for bathing, dressing/grooming, and feeding and has confusion due to a Major Neurocognitive Disorder. ItCDSS inspection report, March 22, 2023 · control 08-AS-20211021152316
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed-Staff did not seek treatment for resident in a timely manner -Staff do not respond to assist residents in a timely manner -Administrator did not allow resident to return, once discharged from skilled nursing facility
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud concluded the complaint investigation regarding the above mentioned allegations. LPA met with Business Manager, Monica Cordoba. During the investigation, the facility was toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff, residents, and outside sources. It was alleged staff did not seek treatment for Resident #1 (R1) in a timely manner. It was reported R1 had a rash from 9/22/22, possibly scabies and the facility did not ensure R1 received timely treatment for the rash, which extended through December 2022. R1’s Physician’s Report dated 06/02/21 indicated R1 was ambulatory and able to self- care with bathing, dressing/grooming, and feeding. R1’s Resident Appraisal dated 06/24/21 indicated R1 was ambulatory and required assistance with bathing supervision; assistance with dressing; and medication management. Outside source interviews revealed R1 had the rash as of 09/22/22 and they contacted the administrator on 09/28/22 to reCDSS inspection report, March 22, 2023 · control 08-AS-20221216100123
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility changed resident's room accommodations without amending the admissions agreement.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Elizabeth Hamilton conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit at the facility. LPA gained access to the facility, met with Administrator, Rocio Granda and explained the purpose of the visit which was to deliver findings for the above allegation. The Department’s investigation consisted of record reviews, interviews with staff, residents, and outside sources. On October 14, 2020, it was alleged that the facility changed resident’s room accommodations without amending the admissions agreement. More specifically, it was alleged that on September 9, 2020 Resident 1 (R1) was on a leave of absence from the facility and upon return to the facility, R1’s personal belongings were moved to a different room without their knowledge. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 14, 2023 · control 08-AS-20201014143359
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff does not properly assist a client while in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On January 17, 2023, at about 1:00 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Daniel Pena conducted a complaint investigation visit regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA was greeted at the entrance by Rocio Granda, Administrator and granted entry after identifying himself and disclosing the reason for the visit. During today's visit, LPA conducted staff and client interviews and concluded the investigation. LPA met with Administrator Granda to discuss the findings of the complaint investigation. It was alleged, facility staff does not properly assist a client in care, specifically regarding prescription medication. The Department’s investigation consisted of virtual and onsite visits, record reviews and interviews with clients, staff and outside parties. Client interviews did not provide information corroborating the allegation that staff withheld or failed to administer prescription medication. Staff interviews revealed a consistent denial of withholding medications from clients. A rCDSS inspection report, January 17, 2023 · control 08-AS-20210226095356

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is retaining a resident that requires a higher level of care
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud concluded the complaint investigation regarding the above mentioned allegation. LPA met with Administrator, Rocio Granda. During the course of the investigation, the facility was toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff, residents, and outside sources. It was alleged the facility is retaining Resident #1 (R1), who requires a higher level of care. R1’s Physician’s Report dated 12/13/21 indicated R1 has Diabetes and requires insulin injections along with blood sugar checks. The physician’s report reflected R1 is unable to administer their own medications, conduct blood sugar checks and has uncontrolled diabetes due to noncompliance. R1’s Resident Appraisal dated 10/17/22 indicated R1 required medication management but is able to handle their other activities of daily living. Outside source interviews revealed R1’s diabetes is not controlled because R1 is unable to manage their own diabetes medications. Outside source iCDSS inspection report, December 20, 2022 · control 08-AS-20221117105339
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewed-Facility staff are not giving resident medication as prescribed -Licensee did not maintain resident's room in a clean, safe, or sanitary condition
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit to conclude a complaint investigation. LPA identified herself and discussed the allegations mentioned above with During the investigation, the facility was briefly toured, records requested, and interviews with staff, residents and outside sources. It was alleged the facility staff are not giving Resident #1 (R1) their medication as prescribed. It was reported R1 did not receive their prescribed antibiotic or psychiatric medication. R1’s Physician Report dated 12/13/21 indicated R1 was ambulatory with a diagnosis of diabetes and mental illness. The report reflected R1 was independent with bathing, dressing/grooming, feeding and toileting themselves. It also stated R1 required a diabetic diet, unable to store or manage their own medications. R1’s Resident Appraisal dated 10/17/22 indicated R1 required a diabetic diet and medication management but was able to handle their other activities of daily living. A reCDSS inspection report, November 29, 2022 · control 08-AS-20220919175153
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident was not able to attend dental appointment due to staff negligence
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit to commence a complaint investigation. LPA identified herself and discussed the allegation mentioned above with Administrator, Rocio Granda During the investigation, the facility was briefly toured, records requested, and interviewed staff and outside sources. It was alleged Resident #1 (R1) was not able to attend a dental appointment due to staff negligence. It was reported R1 had a dental appointment scheduled on 11/10/22 and the facility was made aware R1's medications needed to held/stopped five (5) days prior to the appointment. Outside source interviews revealed the facility was contacted on 11/03/22 reminding them to hold off on the medications starting tomorrow, 11/04/22, confirmation from the Medication Technician Supervisor was received that the medication will be stopped/held. Outside source interviews revealed contacting the facility's Medication Technician Supervisor on 11/09/22 to ensure all isCDSS inspection report, November 15, 2022 · control 08-AS-20221109160427
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewed-Facility showers did not maintain hot water temperature -Bathing facilities are not maintained in operating condition
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit to commence a complaint investigation. LPA identified herself and discussed the allegations mentioned above with Administrator, Rocio Granda. During today's visit, LPA briefly toured the facility, and interviewed staff and residents. It was alleged facility showers did not maintain hot water temperature. The hot water temperature for the shower in Room 41 was not maintained. LPA tested the hot water, which measured at 120 degrees F.. The hot water is not maintaining a consistent temperature and continued to rise up to 128 degrees F.. The cold water is not working properly to maintain a warm temperature, along with the hot water. The hot water was so hot that LPA had to pull their hand back from not getting burned. The shower does not maintain the regulated hot water temperature of 105-120 degrees F.. It was also alleged bathing facilities are not maintained in operating condition. The shower knobs in Room 41CDSS inspection report, September 9, 2022 · control 08-AS-20220901160320
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not protect resident resulting in resident to be humiliated. Staff restricted resident’s right to associate with another resident.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Esther Miller conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to the facility in order to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA was granted entry to the facility by Monica Cordoba, Manager Assistance, after identifying herself and explaining the reason for the visit. On October 27, 2021, it was alleged that the facility’s staff did not protect a resident from name-calling resulting in the resident being humiliated and that facility staff restricted a resident’s right to associate with another resident. The Department’s investigation consisted of review of facility records and interviews of facility staff and outside sources. [Continued on LIC9099-C] UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 20, 2022 · control 08-AS-20211027112238
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff neglect resulting in serious injury. Medication was not administered according to physician's orders. Resident incurred unexplained bruising while in care. Staff did not report an incident to resident's authorized representative.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Esther Miller conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above-mentioned allegations. LPA was granted entry into the facility and met with Monica Cordoba, Manager Assistance, and discussed the purpose of the visit. LPA also spoke with Rocio Granda, Administrator, over the phone. The Department’s investigation consisted of record reviews, including medical and outside source records and interviews with staff and outside sources. On June 16, 2020, it was alleged that staff did not obtain medical treatment for Resident #1 (R1) to have the resident evaluated for injury after multiple falls occurred. It was further alleged that medication was not administered to R1 according to physician’s orders. It was also alleged that R1 incurred unexplained bruising while in care and that the fall incidents were not reported to R1’s responsible party. [Continued on LIC9099-C, page 1 of 4] SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 20, 2022 · control 08-AS-20200616110557
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is in disrepair
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit to conclude the complaint investigation regarding the above mentioned allegations. LPA met with Administrator, Rocio Granda. During the investigation, LPA briefly toured the facility, obtained records, and interviewed staff and residents. It was alleged the facility was in disrepair due to a resident’s doorknob being broken and not locking. It was reported a resident’s doorknob was unable to lock for a period of three months and there were concerns there could be thefts. There are two residents residing in the room with the reported broken lock. Resident interviews confirmed the lock was never broken and the key entry always worked. Staff interviews revealed the doorknob was not reported as broken, but the resident was having difficulty opening the lock. Investigation revealed the doorknob was not broken, one of the two residents in that room was having difficulties unlocking the door due to a medical condiCDSS inspection report, May 18, 2022 · control 08-AS-20220308080259
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not ensure that resident's medication was refilled in a timely manner
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit to conclude the complaint investigation regarding the above mentioned allegations. LPA met with Administrator, Rocio Granda. During the investigation, LPA briefly toured the facility, obtained records, and interviewed staff and residents. It was alleged the facility did not ensure Resident #1’s (R1) medication was filled in a timely manner. R1’s Physician’s Report indicated R1 is able to store and manage their own medications. Staff interviews revealed R1 has requested the facility manage their medications for R1. Facility records revealed R1 did not receive two (2) medications timely in February 2022 and one (1) medication in March 2022. Further staff interviews revealed the facility calls in the refills for R1’s medications and R1 picks them up. Facility’s Medication Administration Record for February 2022 reflected R1 was not given a medication on 02/06/22 and 02/07/22, R1 missed two (2) doses of that meCDSS inspection report, May 18, 2022 · control 08-AS-20220318165203

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 94 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
9
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
11
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
20
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
52
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
94
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(619) 222-1109
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Golden Living Health Management, Inc.? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.