Lily Of The Valley Ii is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in San Diego, San Diego County, California — state license #374601552, with a licensed capacity of 6, listed as closed, licensee initiated in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 18 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated June 4, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

300 homes in view

Lily Of The Valley Ii

The state record lists this licence as “Closed, Licensee Initiated”. A closed licence cannot admit residents. We keep closed licences published because “is this place licensed?” deserves an honest answer.

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 6 residents · San Diego, CA · San Diego County
Closed in state recordWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days · we confirm by phone before any referral
License #374601552, held since 2003 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
11419 Westonhill Drive · San Diego, San Diego County
Phone
(858) 761-6523
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 6 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careVerified in record
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
FACILITY SERVES SIX (6) NON-AMBULATORY ELDERLY RESIDENTS; AGES 60 AND ABOVE. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR ONE (1) RESIDENT. BEDRIDDEN APPROVED FOR ONE (1) RESIDENT IN BEDROOM #3.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 18 times and filed 18 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on June 4, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

Most recent state visit
June 4, 2026
Occupancy at the October 14, 2024 visit
3 of 6 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 6 documents with transcribed findings, dated May 24, 2023 to June 4, 2026. 6 of the 6 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (5). 6 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 6 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 15 of 18 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20263 state visits · 3 documents
Jun 4, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff over medicated a resident in care Facility did not seek medical attention in a timely manner

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted a telephone visit to conclude the complaint investigation regarding the above mentioned allegation. LPA contacted Licensee, Christine Matthews to discuss the finding. During the investigation, records were reviewed, and interviews were conducted with staff and outside sources. It was alleged that staff over medicated a resident in care and the facility did not seek medical attention in a timely manner. Both allegations were regarding Resident #1 (R1). On 05/04/24, an outside source visited R1 and R1 was very sleepy and could barely keep their eyes open. On 05/06/24 an outside source called the facility and spoke with staff who stated R1 was asleep. The outside source called back an hour later and staff stated R1 was asleep but fine. The third time the outside source called they were told the same thing, and requested staff wake R1 up because it was unusual for R1 to sleep all day and so late in the day. Continued on an LIC 9099the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 4, 2026 · control 08-AS-20240520145352
May 15, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Licensee neglected resident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted a telephone visit to conclude the complaint investigation regarding the above mentioned allegation. LPA contacted Licensee, Christine Matthews to discuss the finding. During the investigation, records were reviewed, and interviews were conducted with staff and outside sources. It was alleged that the licensee neglected a resident. The administrator’s interview confirmed that individual was identified by the facility as a renter. The renter resided on the second floor of the facility, where there were no resident rooms. The renter has resided at the facility since 2006. A review of the Facility Personnel Report Summary indicated that the individual reported as a resident was fingerprint cleared and associated to the facility. Facilities are not required to fingerprint and/or associate residents. Title 22 Regulations outlines that any adults other than a resident, residing in the facility, shall have a criminal record clearance.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 15, 2026 · control 08-AS-20211027084921
May 1, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Neglect of resident resulting in pressure injuries Staff did not seek medical attention for resident Staff restricted resident from calling 911 to seek medical attention Staff handled resident in a rough manner Staff did not meet incontinence needs of resident Resident was not accorded dignity in relationships with staff

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted a telephone visit to conclude the complaint investigation on this closed facility. LPA spoke with Licensee, Christine Matthews and emailed reports. During the investigation, the facility was toured, records reviewed and interviews conducted with staff, residents, and outside sources. It was alleged neglect of Resident #1 (R1) resulting in pressure injuries. R1 sustained bilateral Stage 3 and Stage 4 pressure injuries on their coccyx. On 08/25/22, the pressure injuries were observed and documented by a medical professional. R1 was receiving Home Health (HH) services with a certification period of care from 02/2022 through 08/19/22. R1 was provided weekly visits from nurses. On 08/19/22, the HH agency discharged R1 and documented R1’s centered goals per plan of care were met. R1’s vital signs were stable, skin remains intact. There was no documentation of a Stage 3 or Stage 4 pressure injury reflected in the HH discharge notes. Rthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 1, 2026 · control 08-AS-20220825132357
20251 state visit · 1 document
Jul 7, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20247 state visits · 10 documents
Dec 31, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 23, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 14, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff sexually assaulted a resident in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rebecca Ruiz conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA identified herself to, was greeted by, and explained the purpose of the visit to Caregiver Vanessa Cruz. Administrator Rodelio Aquino arrived during the visit. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews with residents, staff, and outside sources, records review, and a tour of the facility. It was alleged that staff sexually assaulted a resident in care, specifically that staff 1 (S1) sexually assaulted Resident 1 (R1) during an incontinence brief change. Review of R1’s most recent medical assessments dated May 2023 revealed that R1 had a diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment, was not confused or disoriented, and was able to follow directions and communicate needs. Continued to LIC9099-C page... Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 14, 2024 · control 08-AS-20230828094536
Oct 14, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 6, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 28, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 14, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not meet resident's needs Staff did not provide food of good quality Staff did not provide basic laundry services

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit to commence a complaint investigation. LPA identified herself and discussed the allegations mentioned above with Staff, Editha Daep. During today's visit, LPA briefly toured the facility, requested records, interviewed staff and residents. It was alleged staff did not meet Resident #1's (R1) needs concerning showering, dressing, and transferring. R1 was admitted to the facility on 02/14/24. The Admission Agreement was signed and outlined R1 required assistance with dressing, toileting, bathing, grooming, mobility task, laundering of personal clothing, and clean bed linens weekly or as often as needed. R1 had an injury and required assistance from staff. Staff interviews revealed R1 refused assistance and R1 stated they could handle it themselves. Therefore, staff only assisted when R1 requested assistance. Resident interviews confirmed staff are assisting them with their activities of daily living. Some resithe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 14, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240311115112
Mar 14, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 24, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 24, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20231 state visit · 1 document
Dec 19, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 0
Type B citations0typical 0
Substantiated complaints0typical 0
Total complaints6typical 0
State visits on file18typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2003.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202633020251102024710020232302021110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$4,000$6,500 /mo
our estimate — San Diego County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,000 · statewide low$8,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one.
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →

Is Lily Of The Valley Ii licensed?

No — not currently. The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists Lily Of The Valley Ii in San Diego (San Diego County), California license #374601552, as “Closed, Licensee Initiated, formerly licensed for 6 residents. State records list 18 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated June 4, 2026, was marked “Unsubstantiated” by the state.

Can Lily Of The Valley Ii care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Lily Of The Valley Ii with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, and hospice care; it does not list bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordFACILITY SERVES SIX (6) NON-AMBULATORY ELDERLY RESIDENTS; AGES 60 AND ABOVE. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR ONE (1) RESIDENT. BEDRIDDEN APPROVED FOR ONE (1) RESIDENT IN BEDROOM #3.

How much does Lily Of The Valley Ii cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Lily Of The Valley Ii's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Diego County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Lily Of The Valley Ii accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Lily Of The Valley Ii is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

3 of 6 beds occupied (50%) when the state visited on October 14, 2024. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Lily Of The Valley Ii?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 18 state visits and 18 dated documents since 2021 for Lily Of The Valley Ii; 6 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated June 4, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

6 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff over medicated a resident in care Facility did not seek medical attention in a timely manner
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted a telephone visit to conclude the complaint investigation regarding the above mentioned allegation. LPA contacted Licensee, Christine Matthews to discuss the finding. During the investigation, records were reviewed, and interviews were conducted with staff and outside sources. It was alleged that staff over medicated a resident in care and the facility did not seek medical attention in a timely manner. Both allegations were regarding Resident #1 (R1). On 05/04/24, an outside source visited R1 and R1 was very sleepy and could barely keep their eyes open. On 05/06/24 an outside source called the facility and spoke with staff who stated R1 was asleep. The outside source called back an hour later and staff stated R1 was asleep but fine. The third time the outside source called they were told the same thing, and requested staff wake R1 up because it was unusual for R1 to sleep all day and so late in the day. Continued on an LIC 9099CDSS inspection report, June 4, 2026 · control 08-AS-20240520145352
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee neglected resident
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted a telephone visit to conclude the complaint investigation regarding the above mentioned allegation. LPA contacted Licensee, Christine Matthews to discuss the finding. During the investigation, records were reviewed, and interviews were conducted with staff and outside sources. It was alleged that the licensee neglected a resident. The administrator’s interview confirmed that individual was identified by the facility as a renter. The renter resided on the second floor of the facility, where there were no resident rooms. The renter has resided at the facility since 2006. A review of the Facility Personnel Report Summary indicated that the individual reported as a resident was fingerprint cleared and associated to the facility. Facilities are not required to fingerprint and/or associate residents. Title 22 Regulations outlines that any adults other than a resident, residing in the facility, shall have a criminal record clearance.CDSS inspection report, May 15, 2026 · control 08-AS-20211027084921
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedNeglect of resident resulting in pressure injuries Staff did not seek medical attention for resident Staff restricted resident from calling 911 to seek medical attention Staff handled resident in a rough manner Staff did not meet incontinence needs of resident Resident was not accorded dignity in relationships with staff
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted a telephone visit to conclude the complaint investigation on this closed facility. LPA spoke with Licensee, Christine Matthews and emailed reports. During the investigation, the facility was toured, records reviewed and interviews conducted with staff, residents, and outside sources. It was alleged neglect of Resident #1 (R1) resulting in pressure injuries. R1 sustained bilateral Stage 3 and Stage 4 pressure injuries on their coccyx. On 08/25/22, the pressure injuries were observed and documented by a medical professional. R1 was receiving Home Health (HH) services with a certification period of care from 02/2022 through 08/19/22. R1 was provided weekly visits from nurses. On 08/19/22, the HH agency discharged R1 and documented R1’s centered goals per plan of care were met. R1’s vital signs were stable, skin remains intact. There was no documentation of a Stage 3 or Stage 4 pressure injury reflected in the HH discharge notes. RCDSS inspection report, May 1, 2026 · control 08-AS-20220825132357

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff sexually assaulted a resident in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rebecca Ruiz conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA identified herself to, was greeted by, and explained the purpose of the visit to Caregiver Vanessa Cruz. Administrator Rodelio Aquino arrived during the visit. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews with residents, staff, and outside sources, records review, and a tour of the facility. It was alleged that staff sexually assaulted a resident in care, specifically that staff 1 (S1) sexually assaulted Resident 1 (R1) during an incontinence brief change. Review of R1’s most recent medical assessments dated May 2023 revealed that R1 had a diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment, was not confused or disoriented, and was able to follow directions and communicate needs. Continued to LIC9099-C page... UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 14, 2024 · control 08-AS-20230828094536
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not meet resident's needs Staff did not provide food of good quality Staff did not provide basic laundry services
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit to commence a complaint investigation. LPA identified herself and discussed the allegations mentioned above with Staff, Editha Daep. During today's visit, LPA briefly toured the facility, requested records, interviewed staff and residents. It was alleged staff did not meet Resident #1's (R1) needs concerning showering, dressing, and transferring. R1 was admitted to the facility on 02/14/24. The Admission Agreement was signed and outlined R1 required assistance with dressing, toileting, bathing, grooming, mobility task, laundering of personal clothing, and clean bed linens weekly or as often as needed. R1 had an injury and required assistance from staff. Staff interviews revealed R1 refused assistance and R1 stated they could handle it themselves. Therefore, staff only assisted when R1 requested assistance. Resident interviews confirmed staff are assisting them with their activities of daily living. Some resiCDSS inspection report, March 14, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240311115112

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed-Staff are not responding to resident's call for help in a timely manner -Staff are not meeting residents laundry needs
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit to conclude the complaint investigation regarding the above mentioned allegations. LPA met with House Manager, Rodelio Aquino. During the investigation, the facility was briefly toured, records requested, and interviews conducted with staff, residents, and outside sources. It was alleged staff are not responding to resident's call for help in a timely manner. Staff interviews revealed they respond within minutes to resident’s call. Staff explained they are in the kitchen or dining room area located near the resident bedrooms and can hear residents call out for help. Some residents use a bell, and some yell out. On 05/16/23, LPA observed residents ring their bell asking for food and the staff went immediately and brought them food. LPA also observed a resident on hospice calling out for water, staff came to the room immediately. Staff admitted to waiting in the common area so that they can hear the residentsCDSS inspection report, May 24, 2023 · control 08-AS-20230511113544

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 18 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing. No substantiated complaints are on file.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
0
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
0
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
6
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
18
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(858) 761-6523
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Lily Of The Valley Ii? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.