Large community · Licensed for 582 · San Diego
Casa De Las Campanas
18655 W Bernardo Dr, San Diego, CA 92127Licensed since 1997
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Dementia · HospiceState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Languages spoken: EnglishReported on Seniorly · August 24, 2026
- Licensed for 582: a large care communityThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 227 residents
- Dementia
- Hospiceup to 20 residents
Not on file: bedridden approval.
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. TWO HUNDRED TWENTY SEVEN (227) MAY BE NON AMBULATORY. 27 WHOM MAY BE DEMENTIA RESIDENTS IN THE DELAYED EGRESS UNIT. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR TWENTY (20) RESIDENTS.
938 - CONTINUE CARE CONTRACT (CCC)
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
Care services
These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.
Assisted living
Reported on casadelascampanas.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Help with bathing or showering
Reported on casadelascampanas.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Assistance with transfers
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Podiatrist visits
Reported on casadelascampanas.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Diabetic / carbohydrate-controlled diet
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Incontinence care
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Mental wellbeing programmingPrograms that promote mental health and reduce anxiety or agitation (for memory care residents) · Meditation session · Yoga · Caregiver support group · Support for anxiety or feeling overwhelmed · Educational resources · and 8 moreWe don’t have this home’s dementia-care disclosure. California requires a home that advertises dementia care to describe that care in writing when you ask.
Programs that promote mental health and reduce anxiety or agitation — reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated June 9, 2026.
Meditation session · Yoga · Caregiver support group — reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated June 9, 2026.
Support for anxiety or feeling overwhelmed · Educational resources · Community programs that strengthen emotional well-being · Emotional support · Resources · Planning for changing needs · Emotional and social needs · Grief support · Depression resources · Trauma-informed guidance — reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated March 24, 2026.
Respite / short-term stays
Reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated May 5, 2026.
Help with dressing and grooming
Reported on casadelascampanas.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Fall prevention program
Reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated May 5, 2026.
Medication management
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Works with residents’ own health care providers
Reported on casadelascampanas.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Diabetes care
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Couples accepted
Reported on casadelascampanas.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Activities of daily living the home lists help withAssistance with activities of daily living (for memory care residents) · Activities of daily living (Palmer Special Care Residence memory-care unit) · Bathing · Grooming · Dressing · Daily assistance · and 1 moreWe don’t have this home’s dementia-care disclosure. California requires a home that advertises dementia care to describe that care in writing when you ask.
Assistance with activities of daily living · Activities of daily living — reported on casadelascampanas.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Bathing · Grooming · Dressing — reported on casadelascampanas.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Daily assistance — reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated June 9, 2026.
Daily tasks — reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated May 5, 2026.
Works with hospice
Reported on casadelascampanas.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Hands-on help or cueingResidents can do daily tasks independently and receive help when needed.
Reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated May 5, 2026.
24-hour supervision claimed
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
LVN on staff
Reported on casadelascampanas.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Training topics namedDaily activities · Personal care · Health monitoring · Dementia care · Behavioral management · Cognitive therapies · and 3 moreWe don’t have this home’s dementia-care disclosure. California requires a home that advertises dementia care to describe that care in writing when you ask.
Daily activities · Personal care · Health monitoring · Dementia care · Behavioral management · Cognitive therapies · Senior care · Safety — reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated May 5, 2026.
Healthy aging — reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated March 24, 2026.
Emergency call system
Reported on casadelascampanas.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Emergency proceduresEvery licensed home in California must do this.
Reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated September 17, 2025.
Visitor screening
Reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated September 17, 2025.
Supervisory staff
Reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated May 5, 2026.
Certified nursing assistants on staff
Reported on casadelascampanas.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Security staff on site
Reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated March 28, 2024.
Staff vaccination policyEmployee COVID-19 vaccinations are required.
Reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated September 17, 2025.
Licensed or certified staff
Reported on casadelascampanas.com · seen October 5, 2026.
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 20 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation on file
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Casa De Las Campanas: two-person transfers or a lift and who is awake overnight. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
Covelight estimate
$4,450a month to start
Likely $3,450–$5,650
From 19 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Costs & moving in
How care costs are added to the rentTiered levels — “The Type C contract also offers you access to our full continuum of care.”
Reported on casadelascampanas.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Proof of ability to pay required
Reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated October 21, 2025.
Refund policy for deposits, community fees, and prepaid rentThe refund process typically takes 14 days.Return-of-Capital Plan contract
Reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated October 21, 2025.
What the base rate includesMaintenance · Utilities · Housekeeping · Some meals
Reported on casadelascampanas.com · seen October 5, 2026.
What costs extraMoving costs (Residents' responsibility) · Renovating expenses (Residents' responsibility) · Additional meals · Ancillary services
Reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated August 20, 2026.
Monthly cost breakdownWith a studio and basic help · room, care and fees$4,450likely a month
Starting monthly rate$4,450likely $3,450–$5,650
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 19 communities with 50 or more beds within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,450–$5,800
- $4,450
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,250–$9,000
- $6,950
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes19 nearby homes publish starting rates of $2,700 to $9,750
19 homes like this within 10 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,350–$7,500.
- Remington Club IISan Diego · 2.0 mi · Large community$4,100Listed on Seniorly · assisted living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Ivy Park at EscondidoEscondido · 2.8 mi · Large community$4,495Listed on its own website · private studio & companion suite available floor plans · seen October 27, 2026
- Activcare at 4S RanchSan Diego · 3.0 mi · Large community$8,650Listed on Seniorly · memory care shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026. We don’t have this home’s dementia-care disclosure. California requires a home that advertises dementia care to describe that care in writing when you ask.
- Redwood TerraceEscondido · 3.9 mi · Large community$5,297Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
- Vista Del Lago Memory CareEscondido · 4.0 mi · Large community$5,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Westmont of EscondidoEscondido · 5.2 mi · Large community$3,495Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Cypress Court EscondidoEscondido · 6.2 mi · Large community$3,475Listed on its own website · studio · seen October 5, 2026
- Las Villas Del NorteEscondido · 6.2 mi · Large community$2,700Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Gardens at EscondidoEscondido · 6.3 mi · Large community$2,850Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Villa LorenaSan Diego · 6.5 mi · Large community$3,995Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Silverado Senior Living-EscondidoEscondido · 6.6 mi · Large community$9,750Listed on Seniorly · memory care · seen September 9, 2026. We don’t have this home’s dementia-care disclosure. California requires a home that advertises dementia care to describe that care in writing when you ask.
- Rancho Penasquitos Senior LivingSan Diego · 7.0 mi · Large community$3,195Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Ivy Park at Sabre SpringsSan Diego · 7.2 mi · Large community$3,695Listed on its own website · private studio & companion suites available floor plans · seen October 27, 2026
- Tuscan Hills Senior LivingEscondido · 7.2 mi · Large community$4,400Listed on its own website · assisted and independent living options, including studio apartments · seen October 5, 2026
- Marbella San MarcosSan Marcos · 9.4 mi · Large community$3,795Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- The Meridian at Lake San MarcosSan Marcos · 9.4 mi · Large community$3,595Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Ridgeview Assisted Living CommunitySan Diego · 9.4 mi · Large community$9,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
- Silvergate San Marcos Retirement ResidenceSan Marcos · 9.5 mi · Large community$4,195Listed on its own website · apartment homes, starting price · seen October 27, 2026
- Westmont of Carmel ValleySan Diego · 9.9 mi · Large community$6,695Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 19 communities with 50 or more beds within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Rooms, meals, activities and house rules, in the home’s own words. Open any detail to see where it came from.
Rooms & the spaces they will use (20)Private rooms · Building type · Wifi
Private rooms
Reported on casadelascampanas.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Building typeCampus
Reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated May 5, 2026.
Wifi
Reported on casadelascampanas.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Shared / companion rooms
Reported on casadelascampanas.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Outdoor spaceLandscaped courtyard (for memory care residents) · Secure landscaped courtyard (Palmer Special Care Residence memory-care unit) · Trails · Walking trails · Two dog parks · Bell Tower Park · and 5 moreWe don’t have this home’s dementia-care disclosure. California requires a home that advertises dementia care to describe that care in writing when you ask.
Landscaped courtyard · Secure landscaped courtyard — reported on casadelascampanas.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Trails — reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated May 7, 2026.
Walking trails — reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated October 21, 2025.
Two dog parks · Bell Tower Park · Dog parks — reported on casadelascampanas.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Secure courtyards — reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated May 5, 2026.
Outdoor common space · Garden · Walking paths — reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Private bathroom
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Common areasComfortable TV lounge (for memory care residents) · Shared common areas (Palmer Special Care Residence memory-care unit) · Bell tower · Fitness Center Courtyard · Clubhouse · Two libraries · and 15 moreWe don’t have this home’s dementia-care disclosure. California requires a home that advertises dementia care to describe that care in writing when you ask.
Comfortable TV lounge · Shared common areas — reported on casadelascampanas.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Bell tower — reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated May 7, 2026.
Fitness Center Courtyard · Clubhouse · Norte Lounge · Norte Lobby/Entrance — reported on casadelascampanas.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Two libraries — reported on casadelascampanas.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Common spaces — reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated June 9, 2026.
Community gathering spaces — reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated March 15, 2023.
Dining room · Business room · Library · Arts room · Activity room · Movie theater · Game room · Swimming pool / jacuzzi · Spa / sauna / wellness room · Fitness room — reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Indoor Common Areas — reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Room types2-bedroom apartment · 1-bedroom apartment · Alcove studio · Private assisted living apartment · Semiprivate assisted living apartment · Apartment-home · and 3 more
2-bedroom apartment · 1-bedroom apartment · Alcove studio · Private assisted living apartment · Semiprivate assisted living apartment · Apartment-home — reported on casadelascampanas.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Nine different independent living floor plans — reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated March 28, 2024.
1 Bedroom · 2 Bedrooms — reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
LaundryDone by staff
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Residents may bring their own furniture
Reported on casadelascampanas.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Visitor parking
Reported on casadelascampanas.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Rooms come furnished
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
AmenitiesFully equipped fitness center with a massage room · All-season indoor pool · Heated outdoor pool · Arts and crafts studio · Hair and nail salon · Entertainment · and 69 more
Fully equipped fitness center with a massage room · All-season indoor pool · Heated outdoor pool · Arts and crafts studio · Hair and nail salon · Entertainment · Social events · Fully equipped fitness center · Massage room — reported on casadelascampanas.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Fitness center · Putting green · Dog parks — reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated October 21, 2025.
On-campus dog parks · Billiards lounge · Ping pong tables · Bocce court · Libraries · Woodworking and hobby shop · Exercise studio · Heated outdoor swimming pool — reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated October 21, 2025.
Large pet-friendly campus — reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated March 28, 2024.
Sur Outdoor Pool · Clubhouse · Sorby Art Gallery · Norte Outdoor Pool · Clubhouse & Sur Outdoor Pool · Woodworking Shop — reported on casadelascampanas.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Baby grand piano — reported on casadelascampanas.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Outdoor Pool · Norte Lounge · Norte Lobby/Entrance · Fitness Center Courtyard & Putting Green · Clubhouse & Outdoor Pool · Indoor Swimming Pool — reported on casadelascampanas.com · seen October 5, 2026.
On-site banking · Notary public services · Indoor pool · Fitness studio · Guest rooms · La Tienda convenience store · Two libraries · Two dog parks · Bell Tower Park · Car Charging Stations · Computer Room · Salon de Casa for hairstyling and manicures · Woodworking/Hobby Shop · Fully equipped fitness center with indoor pool, fitness studio and massage room · Outdoor heated swimming pool — reported on casadelascampanas.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Electric vehicle charging stations — reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated August 20, 2026.
Multiple dining venues — reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated July 27, 2026.
Dining choices · Fitness · Aquatics · Creative arts · Lifelong learning · Social clubs · Fitness and aquatics — reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated May 5, 2026.
Soothing color schemes · Familiar layouts — reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated May 5, 2026.
Fully equipped on-site fitness center — reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated October 21, 2025.
Indoor and outdoor pools · A woodworking shop · An arts and crafts studio — reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated October 21, 2025.
Housekeeping · Dining · Indoor maintenance · Outdoor maintenance · Community gathering spaces · 24-hour security · Transportation · Activities · A fitness center — reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated March 15, 2023.
Concierge · Move-in coordination — reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Wifi in resident rooms
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Housekeeping
Reported on casadelascampanas.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Air conditioning in the room
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Salon or barber
Reported on casadelascampanas.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Cable or satellite TV
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Kitchenette in the unit
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Telephone in the room
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Meals, preferences & familiar food (14)Dining style · Special diets supported · Who does the cooking
Dining styleRestaurant style
Reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated May 1, 2026.
Special diets supportedSpecial dietary needs
Reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated May 25, 2023.
Who does the cookingProfessional chef
Reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated March 28, 2024.
Food allergy management
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
All-day or flexible dining
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Nutrition specialist on staff
Reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated March 28, 2024.
Residents choose between options at each meal
Reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated May 25, 2023.
Residents have input into the menu
Reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated March 28, 2024.
Dishes the home names, on a published menu or in its own description of its foodLocally sourced ingredients
Reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated May 25, 2023.
Meal timesLunch · Dinner
Reported on casadelascampanas.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Meals provided
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Professional chef
Reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated May 1, 2026.
Places to eat on siteOn-campus restaurants · Two dining rooms · Casual bistro · The Sur Dining Room · Sur Buffet Dining · La Terraza Dining Room · and 7 more
On-campus restaurants — reported on casadelascampanas.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Two dining rooms · Casual bistro — reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated March 28, 2024.
The Sur Dining Room · La Terraza Dining Room — reported on casadelascampanas.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Sur Buffet Dining — reported on casadelascampanas.com · seen October 5, 2026.
La Terraza/Norte Dining — reported on casadelascampanas.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Casual bistro dining — reported on casadelascampanas.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Bistro — reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated July 27, 2026.
A casual bistro · On-site Dinner Theatre — reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated October 21, 2025.
Multiple dining venues — reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated June 1, 2023.
Bistro/coffee bar — reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated May 25, 2023.
Dining atmosphereGourmet dining
Reported on casadelascampanas.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Activities & the rhythm of a day (7)The shape of an ordinary day, as the home describes it · Activity types offered · Activity calendar published
The shape of an ordinary day, as the home describes itFull schedule of activities, socials and entertainment
Reported on casadelascampanas.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Activity types offeredEntertainment · Social events · Shopping outings · Dining outings · Entertainment outings · Local experiences around San Diego · and 157 moreWe don’t have this home’s dementia-care disclosure. California requires a home that advertises dementia care to describe that care in writing when you ask.
Entertainment · Social events — reported on casadelascampanas.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Shopping outings · Dining outings · Entertainment outings · Local experiences around San Diego · Activities · Socials · Familiar hobbies · Socializing · Hobbies · Shopping · Dining — reported on casadelascampanas.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Social engagement · Interaction and forming connections · Therapeutic activities · Music therapy · Art therapy · Memory exercises — reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated June 9, 2026.
Supporting the local homeless population · Knitting for premature babies in area hospitals · Benefiting the Casa Foundation team-member scholarship fund — reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated May 7, 2026.
Group events · Social involvement — reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated May 5, 2026.
Cognitive stimulation · Regular movement · Sunlight · Time outdoors — reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated May 5, 2026.
Organized activities · Events — reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated May 1, 2026.
Solo moments in quiet spaces · Introverted activities · Festive events · Social clubs · Low-stress activities for introverts — reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated October 21, 2025.
High Adventure Club — reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated October 21, 2025.
Social activities · Recreational activities — reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated April 30, 2024.
Amenities · Classes · Courses · Programs · Speaker series · Wellness opportunities — reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated March 28, 2024.
Wellness programs — reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated March 25, 2024.
Speakers · Shows · Gatherings — reported on casadelascampanas.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Committee meetings · Yoga · Night at the theater · Zumba class · Bridge · Zumba — reported on casadelascampanas.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Casa Residents for Education sponsors an annual scholarship drive · Casa Residents for Education provides support to local schools · Residents share their blessings and skills with neighbors in Rancho Bernardo and farther — reported on casadelascampanas.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Residents reach beyond campus to improve the lives of vulnerable members of the San Diego area, including the homeless population and premature babies · Over 40 resident-run committees — reported on casadelascampanas.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Volunteering to serve the homeless · Knitting hats for premature babies · Sharing meals · Hikes · Card games · Movie nights · Lectures · Book club · Resident committees · Volunteering · Committee work · Mentorship · Hobby · Interesting lectures · Exercise classes — reported on casadelascampanas.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Social · Recreational · Social and recreational activities — reported on casadelascampanas.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Invited speakers · Parties · Interesting speakers · Fun parties — reported on casadelascampanas.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Unlimited social opportunities · A wide variety of activities · Emotional · Environmental · Health services · Intellectual · Physical · Vocational · Spiritual activities — reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated July 28, 2026.
Aquatic fitness class · Arts and crafts — reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated July 27, 2026.
Spiritual · Fitness classes · Dining experiences · Happy hours · Intellectual presentations on current events and the natural world · Committee meetings about upcoming events · Not-so-technical forum · Travelogues · Photography club · Spanish conversations · Mock investment club · Resident-run presentations · Groups · Skill development · Intellectual wellness activities · Intellectual presentations · A not-so-technical forum · A photography club · A mock investment club · A class · A new group · Developing a new skill — reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated July 21, 2026.
Mindfulness · Meditation · Support groups · Outdoor activities · Caregiver support group · Community events — reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated June 9, 2026.
Yoga classes · Evenings at the theater · Brain-stimulating exercises · Art programs · Group outings · Social gatherings — reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated May 5, 2026.
Scenic hikes · Creative pursuits · Hot air balloons · Open-cockpit biplanes · Skydiving · Engaging social activities — reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated May 5, 2026.
Mentoring · Leading a committee · Teaching a class · Checking in on a neighbor — reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated May 5, 2026.
Socialize — reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated December 11, 2025.
Woodworking · Golf — reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated October 21, 2025.
Providing meals to the homeless · Supporting local schools — reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated October 21, 2025.
In-person exercise classes · Online exercise classes · Virtual celebrations · Birthday celebrations · Anniversary celebrations — reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated September 17, 2025.
Diverse resident-driven programs · Lifelong learning · Education · Culture · Music · The arts — reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated May 25, 2023.
Hiking · Biking · Birdwatching · Volunteer groups · Bocce ball — reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated March 15, 2023.
Activities to enhance physical and mental well-being · Activities to enhance your physical and mental well-being — reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated March 15, 2023.
Music programs · Scheduled daily activities · Outdoor programs — reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Activities On-site — reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Activity calendar published
Reported on casadelascampanas.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Exercise or fitness programFitness center · Exercise classes · Hikes along the Coast to Coast Trail · Workout options and classes · Daily wellness and fitness classes · In-person exercise classes · and 1 more
Fitness center · Exercise classes · Hikes along the Coast to Coast Trail — reported on casadelascampanas.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Workout options and classes — reported on casadelascampanas.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Daily wellness and fitness classes — reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated May 5, 2026.
In-person exercise classes · Online exercise classes — reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated September 17, 2025.
Trips outside the home
Reported on casadelascampanas.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Resident-run activities
Reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated March 28, 2024.
Religious services off site
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Faith, culture & language (2)Faith tradition · Languages spoken by caregivers
Faith traditionPastoral care
Reported on casadelascampanas.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Languages spoken by caregiversEnglish
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Pets, routines & independence (3)Residents may bring a pet · Residents' council · Pet types allowed
Residents may bring a petYes — “Because pet guidelines may vary by residence and situation, residents should speak with a sales representative for complete policy details.”
Reported on casadelascampanas.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Residents' council
Reported on casadelascampanas.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Pet types allowedDog
Reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated March 15, 2023.
Visiting & staying involved (11)Care conferences with the family · Transport to medical appointments · Office or phone hours as published
Care conferences with the family
Reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated May 5, 2026.
Transport to medical appointments
Reported on casadelascampanas.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Office or phone hours as publishedMon-Sun: 8:00am - 5:00pm
Reported on casadelascampanas.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Neighborhood or area namedRancho Bernardo
Reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated October 21, 2025.
Support services for families
Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.
Limits on transportationTo all the nearby doctor's offices and medical clinics
Reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated January 23, 2024.
- Open on the website
Contact form
Reported on casadelascampanas.com · seen October 5, 2026.
SettingCampus
Reported on casadelascampanas.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Transport for group outings
Reported on casadelascampanas.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Notes on visiting accessEasy access to major arteries, health systems, and the wider North County scene
Reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated May 5, 2026.
Transportation
Reported on casadelascampanas.com · seen October 5, 2026.
About the home (3)Brand or trade name · Management company · For-profit or nonprofit
Brand or trade nameCasa de las Campanas
Reported on casadelascampanas.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Management companyLife Care Services
Reported on casadelascampanas.com · source dated October 21, 2025.
For-profit or nonprofitNonprofit
Reported on casadelascampanas.com · seen October 5, 2026.
Where it is
18655 W Bernardo Dr, San Diego, CA 92127Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- Palomar Ucsd Medical Center PowayHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list3.9 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #374600488 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 15 of 23 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 5 “Unsubstantiated” and 2 “Unfounded”.
20264 state visits · 5 documents
Aug 21, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Provider made material misrepresentations to depositors, prospective residents, or residents of a continuing care retirement community via the information provided on their Disclosure Statement.
This report is an amendment to the 9099 dated August 1, 2025. Licensing Program Analyst Hall delivered complaint findings to the Health Center Administrator of Casa de las Campanas on August 21, 2026 via phone. The California Continuing Care Contracts Bureau (CCCB) received a complaint on November 28, 2023 alleging that Casa de las Campanas materially misrepresented its financial position in its Disclosure Statement by overstating Operating Income through the inclusion of non-operating revenue. The complaint was initially investigated by CCCB financial analyst Jennifer Houston and determined to be unsubstantiated. Continued on 9099C Unsubstantiated The matter was reopened in January 2026 after the department received additional information and supplemental information was received in July 2026. CDSS staff, reviewed audited financial statements and reconciliations submitted by the provider, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), Financial Accounting Standard Board (FASB), Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities aka CARF International (CARF) and California Business and Professions Code section 651. Allegation: Provider made material misrepresentations to depositors, prospective residents, or residents of a continuing care retirement community via the information provided on their Disclosure Statement. UNSUBSTANTIATED. The review confirmed that the figures reported in the Disclosure Statement as “Income from Ongoing Operations/Operating Income” included resident revenue, investment and dividend income, realized investment gains, and gains/support. The Department further confirmed that, with these included sums, the figure generally aligned with the audited financial statements, with minor discrepancies noted. The Department noted that neither the continuing care contract statutes nor GAAP provide a single mandatory definition of “Operating Income” for nonprofit organizations, nor do they explicitly prohibit inclusion of investment-related income in such calculations. Additionally, the Department utilizes CARF ratios to assess the financial viability of CCRCs. CARF recognizes that financial statement reporting can vary significantly among providers and auditors. To promote consistency in its financial ratio analysis, CARF applies specific protocols to audited financial information. For purposes of calculating margin ratios, CARF treats interest earnings and net assets released from restriction as operating revenues, and its Ratio Pro spreadsheet includes interest and dividends in operating revenue. CARF also notes that providers with established ongoing development efforts may find it useful to calculate the ratios to include those activities as well. Consequently, the Department cannot find that the provider materially misrepresented operating income when it included such sums in the “Income from Ongoing Operations/Operating Income” line of its disclosure statement. Continued on 9099C.2 Furthermore, the Department reviewed the monthly care fee increase for FYE 2023 and determined that it met the applicable statutory requirements. The applicable statutes do not require the information supporting the monthly care fee increase to reconcile with the “Income from Ongoing Operations/Operating Income” amounts reported in the Disclosure Statement. Based on the investigation, the preponderance of evidence standards has not been met. Therefore, the above allegation is determined to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED means that the allegation may have happened or may be valid, but there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 21, 2026 · control 08-AS-20231128124359
Aug 5, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure the fire alarm was not in disrepair. Faciity does not have a qualified skilled professional for residents.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arian Golbakhsh conducted an unannounced visit to conduct a complaint investigation and delivered findings regarding the above mentioned allegations. LPA was welcomed by, identified themselves to, and discussed the purpose of their visit to Director of Residential Health Shila Jurado and Executive Director Stefanie Thune-Barnes. Note, LPA did step out for lunch from 12:15-1:15pm. On 07/27/2026, the Department received a complaint where it was alleged that the facility did not maintain their fire panel in good operating condition and that there were no licensed nurses present during overnight shifts. The Department’s investigation consisted of an unannounced facility visit, records review, and interviews with staff, residents, and outside sources. [Continued on LIC 9099-C, page 1 of 3] Unsubstantiated [Continued from LIC 9099] Per interviews with staff, in the evening of 7/26/26, a staff member had notified managerial and maintenance staff of a beeping alarm on the fire panel in the Assisted Living area of the facility. Per staff interviews, it was determined that a node in the panel was not working properly, and that maintenance staff had responded that same evening to take a look at it. Per maintenance staff interviews, the issue was determined to not be urgent based on the section of the panel indicating the node issue. It was also revealed that the facility conducts weekly testing of fire alert systems and so an order was requested with the facility's fire tech vendor to take a look at the node during the next scheduled visit on 8/3/26. File review of an email from facility staff to the vendor company dated 7/28/26 confirmed the request for the tech take a look at the node. An additional email dated 8/5/26 from the vendor company confirmed the work completed during the visit on 8/3/26. File review of maintenance records from June through August 2026 verified that a fire tech has come out to the facility on a weekly basis. Interview with an outside source from the fire tech company confirmed that the facility reached out on 7/28/26 about the issue and also revealed that node alerts do not necessarily indicate that a fire alarm system is non-functioning. Interviews with residents did not reveal any concerns about fire safety in the facility. The facility had demonstrated that it was aware of the work needed for the panel's repair and had taken timely action to do so based on the level of urgency determined. In regards to the second allegation of the facility not having a qualified skilled professional, specifically nurses, present at the facility during overnight shifts, file review and interviews indicated that there were appropriately skilled/trained staff present during overnight shifts. Additionally, as community care facilities are non-medical facilities, there are no requirements for licensed medical staff to be present. Per regulation 87415 pertaining to night supervision, overnight staff "shall be familiar with the facility's planned emergency procedures, shall be trained in first aid as required in Section 87465, Incidental Medical and Dental Care Services and shall be available as indicated below to assist in caring for residents in the event of an emergency." [Continued on LIC 9099-C, page 2 of 3] [Continued from LIC 9099-C, page 3 of 3] Regulation 87415 also lists the ratio of overnight staff needed per census of the facility. As the facility currently has a census of 515 residents, they would require at least five (5) staff present and awake at the facility overnight, another present staff member on call (not necessarily awake), and another staff member on call and able to arrive to the facility within 10 minutes. File review of staff schedules for the month of July 2026 revealed that there were at least two (2) nurses and at least four (4) caregivers at the facility (not counting the facility's Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) present or non-care staff) during overnight shifts, thus meeting required staffing ratios. File review of staff training records for several night shift staff revealed that they had record of all required training. Based on interviews and records review, while the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred – therefore the allegations have been determined to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted with Residential Health Director Jurado to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058) were provided. Their signature below confirms receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 5, 2026 · control 08-AS-20260727143036
Apr 6, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Liliana Silveira conducted an unannounced visit to conduct a Required Annual Inspection. LPA was welcomed by, identified himself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Residential Care Coordinator Silvia Cruz. According to the facility’s license, the facility has a maximum capacity for five-hundred eighty-two (582) residents, of which two-hundred twenty-seven (227) may be non-ambulatory but none may be bedridden, and of which twenty (20) may be under hospice care. During this annual inspection, there were a total of five hundred and three (503) residents in care, of whom one-hundred fifty four (114) were non-ambulatory, and none were bedridden. Ten (10) of the residents were under hospice care. The facility’s license included endorsement for use of delayed-egress doors in the facility’s dementia-care unit. LPA reviewed records for multiple residents and multiple staff. LPA interviewed multiple residents and multiple staff. LPA, accompanied by Silvia Cruz, also toured the interior and exterior of the facility, and inspected common areas and multiple resident rooms. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Resident bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Multiple resident pendant, push-button, and pull-cord call devices were tested. Doors, windows and screens, toilets, and showers were working. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and resident activities. The facility’s ambient internal temperature was compliant at 74 F. (CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE) [CONTINUED FROM LIC 809] Where tested, hot water temperature at taps accessible to residents were all compliant: Bedroom #476A Sink was 117.1 F, Bedroom #478 Sink was 117.2 F, Bedroom #18 Sink was 113 F, Bedroom #16 Sink was 106 F. Appliances to preserve perishable food were also all compliant in temperature. There was at least two (2) days of perishable food, and at least seven (7) days of non-perishable food present, all safely stored. Plenty of cooking and dining equipment and utensils were present. There were no sharp objects, toxic chemicals/poisons, active fireplaces, or open-faced heaters accessible to residents. Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. Confidential records were stored in locked areas. The facility’s swimming pools were secured behind locked fences and gates, consistent with regulation. Per Executive Director Stefanie Thune-Barnes no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Fire detection system, carbon monoxide detectors, nighttime lighting, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all working. The facility’s fire extinguishers were serviced within the last twelve (12) months. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. Fire/disaster drills were performed at required intervals. There were reserve supplies of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). Licensee presented proof of current business liability insurance. No deficiencies were cited during this annual inspection. An exit interview was conducted with Silvia Cruz, Executive Director Stefanie Thune-Barnes and Director of Residential Health Shila Jurado (via telephone), to whom a copy of this report, and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided during today’s visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 6, 2026
Jan 6, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnfounded
Allegation investigated: Facility staff financially abused resident in care.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arian Golbakhsh conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for a complaint investigation regarding the above mentioned allegation. LPA was welcomed by, identified themselves to, and discussed the purpose of their visit to Residential Administrator Tyre Richards. On 08/07/2025, the Department received a complaint where it was alleged that a resident (identified as R1) had tried to withdraw a substantial amount of cash from their bank, stating that the purpose of the money was to give to a friend. Per the complaint, it was believed that the friend in question was a caregiver at the facilty. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, records review, and interviews with staff, residents, and outside sources. [Continued on LIC 9099-C] Unfounded [Continued from LIC 9099] R1 resides in the independent living portion of the facility and has no diagnosis of cognitive impairment. Per review of R1's physician's report dated July 2004, it is noted that R1 can manage their own cash resources. The department had requested from the facility if there was a more recent physician's report on file and it was revealed that R1 had not had any changes in condition that required an updated report. However, the facility conducts annual assessments to monitor resident status. Per review of facility assessments on R1 conducted September 2022, September 2023, and October 2024, R1 is noted to be independent and does not require care and supervision. Per interview with R1, it was revealed that they have a private caregiver from an outside agency that assists with household tasks, errands, and appointments. R1 explained that they were aware their private caregiver could not accept money or tips from R1. When asked about the incident described in the complaint allegation, it was revealed R1 was preparing for a trip and preferred to travel with cash. R1 revealed they were uncomfortable and offended with being questioned about their reasons for withdrawing money and so they provided the first statement that came to mind. An outside source interview revealed they had no concerns regarding R1's cognitive status or concerns about R1 being financially abused. This interview corroborated that R1 preferred to travel with cash on hand. The Department has investigated the complaint alleging financial abuse. We have found that the complaint was UNFOUNDED, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. We have dismissed the complaint. An exit interview was conducted with Residential Administrator Richards to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058) were provided. Their signature below confirms receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 6, 2026 · control 08-AS-20250807160532
Jan 6, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnfounded
Allegation investigated: Lack of supervision.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arian Golbakhsh conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for a complaint investigation regarding the above mentioned allegation. LPA was welcomed by, identified themselves to, and discussed the purpose of their visit to Residential Administrator Tyre Richards. On 10/22/2025, the Department received a complaint where it was alleged that a private caregiver for a resident at the facility was clocking in for shifts at the facility they were not physically present for. Per the complaint, this had been going on for a period of three (3) weeks. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, records review, and interviews with staff and outside sources. [Continued on LIC 9099-C] Unfounded [Continued from LIC 9099] Per records review of admission/discharge records for R1, it was revealed that R1 had been residing in the SNF for over a year and a half, pre-dating the timeline of the complaint. The Department has no jurisdiction in Skilled Nursing Facilities (SNFs) as they are regulated by the Department of Public Health, therefore there is no indication of a violation of Community Care Licensing Regulations. Review of facility staff association records did not reveal any matches to the caregiver named in the complaint. The agency has investigated the complaint alleging lack of supervision. We have determined that the complaint was UNFOUNDED, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. We have dismissed the complaint. An exit interview was conducted with Residential Administrator Richards to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058) were provided. Their signature below confirms receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 6, 2026 · control 08-AS-20251022140438
20254 state visits · 7 documents
Dec 22, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arian Golbakhsh conducted an unannounced Case Management visit to follow up on an incident reported to Community Care Licensing. LPA was welcomed by, identified themselves to, and discussed the purpose of the visit to Executive Director (ED) Stefanie Thune-Barnes and Health Services Administrator Brooke Patterson. Director of Residential Health Shila Jurado and Residential Administrator Tyre Richards joined later during the visit. Community Care Licensing received an Incident Report on 9/5/25 in which it was reported that on 9/3/25, a memory care Resident (identified as R1), was discovered on the floor during rounds and that they had sustained an open wound to the back of their head. Per the report, R1 was unable to state how they had fallen. Emergency services were contacted and R1 was taken to the hospital where they received staples to close their wound. R1 was discharged back to the facility same day. Per the report, R1's responsible party, primary care physician, and hospice agency were notified. During today's visit, LPA conducted interviews and file review. A health and safety visit with R1 could not be completed as R1 had passed away shortly after the incident from their hospice diagnosis. Due to time constraints, LPA was unable to complete a determination regarding this case management visit, and additional visits may be necessary to complete review of this incident. At this time, LPA observed no health and/or safety concerns and no deficiencies were cited during today's visit. An exit interview was conducted with Residential Administrator Richards to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058) were provided. Their signature below confirms receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 22, 2025
Dec 22, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arian Golbakhsh conducted an unannounced Case Management visit to follow up on an incident reported to Community Care Licensing. LPA was welcomed by, identified themselves to, and discussed the purpose of the visit to Executive Director (ED) Stefanie Thune-Barnes and Health Services Administrator Brooke Patterson. Director of Residential Health Shila Jurado and Residential Administrator Tyre Richards joined later during the visit. Community Care Licensing received an Incident Report on 11/12/25 in which it was reported that on 11/6/25, an Independent Living Resident (identified as R1), contacted the facility's reception to request medical assistance. Upon arrival, staff noted bruising along R1's face, back, and arm. Per the report, R1 stated they had a series of falls throughout the week that they did not report, and the most recent being that morning. Staff noted additional bruising along R1's right rib cage. Emergency services were contacted and R1 was taken to the hospital where they were treated for multiple rib fractures. R1 was discharged 11/9/25 with medication changes for possible infection and given a walker. Per the report, R1's neuro and cognitive testing came back normal. During today's visit, LPA conducted interviews and file review. Additionally, LPA conducted a phone call with R1. Interviews corroborated that the facility responded immediately once notified of the incident and arranged for medical care. File review of R1's records note R1 to be independent in all Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). [Continued on LIC 809-C] [Continued on from LIC 809] As the facility responded accordingly once notified of the incident and arranged for proper and prompt medical care, no violations were observed during today's visit and no deficiencies cited. An exit interview was conducted with Residential Administrator Richards to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058) were provided. Their signature below confirms receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 22, 2025
Dec 22, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arian Golbakhsh conducted an unannounced Case Management visit to follow up on an incident reported to Community Care Licensing. LPA was welcomed by, identified themselves to, and discussed the purpose of the visit to Executive Director (ED) Stefanie Thune-Barnes and Health Services Administrator Brooke Patterson. Director of Residential Health Shila Jurado and Residential Administrator Tyre Richards joined later during the visit. Community Care Licensing received an Incident Report on 12/1/25 in which it was reported that on 11/26/25, an Independent Living Resident (identified as R1), contacted the facility's reception through their pull cord. Upon arrival, staff noted R1 on the floor between their bathroom and bed. Per the report, R1 verbalized that they had hit their head and presented with disorientation. Resident was transported to the hospital by emergency services where they were diagnosed with a closed head injury and shoulder injury. Resident returned to the facility's Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) for rehabilitation. During today's visit, LPA conducted interviews and file review. Additionally, LPA conducted a visit with R1 and interview did not reveal any licensing or regulatory concerns. File review of R1's records reveal that R1 was part of the independent living community of the facility. As the facility responded accordingly once notified of the incident and arranged for proper and prompt medical care, no violations were observed during today's visit and no deficiencies cited. An exit interview was conducted with Residential Administrator Richards to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058) were provided. Their signature below confirms receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 22, 2025
Dec 22, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arian Golbakhsh conducted an unannounced Case Management visit to follow up on an incident reported to Community Care Licensing. LPA was welcomed by, identified themselves to, and discussed the purpose of the visit to Executive Director (ED) Stefanie Thune-Barnes and Health Services Administrator Brooke Patterson. Director of Residential Health Shila Jurado and Residential Administrator Tyre Richards joined later during the visit. Community Care Licensing received an Incident Report on 11/3/25 in which it was reported that on 10/31/25, a memory care Resident (identified as R1), was noted to have small sores behind their knee due to a below the knee splint from a prior injury. Resident was transported to the hospital where they were treated for the injury and the skin assessed. Per the report, R1 returned to the facility same day and that their prior leg injury was stable. R1's responsible party and primary care physician were notified. During today's visit, LPA conducted interviews and file review. Additionally, LPA conducted a visit with R1. Due to time constraints, LPA was unable to complete a determination regarding this case management visit, and additional visits may be necessary to complete review of this incident. At this time, LPA observed no health and/or safety concerns and no deficiencies were cited during today's visit. An exit interview was conducted with Residential Administrator Richards to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058) were provided. Their signature below confirms receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 22, 2025
Aug 1, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Provider made material misrepresentations to depositors, prospective residents, or residents of a continuing care retirement community via the information provided on their Disclosure Statement.
Staff Services Manager I (SSMI) contacted Brooke Harris, Administrator, via telephone on August 1, 2025, to deliver complaint findings over the phone, SSMI explained the purpose of the call. The California Continuing Care Contracts Bureau (CCCB) received a complaint on November 28, 2023, alleging that Casa de las Campanas (CDLC) violated Health and Safety Code (H&SC) section 1793.21(t) by materially misrepresenting its financial position in the Disclosure Statement provided to prospective residents. Specifically, the complaint claimed that CDLC consistently overstated its Operating Income on the form, misleading potential residents into believing the organization was in a stronger financial position than it actually was. The Disclosure Statement is a required document under H&SC section 1789.1, intended to provide an accurate and transparent financial overview to prospective residents. (Report continued on LIC 9099C) Unsubstantiated The complainant alleged that the Operating Income line item was inflated by including non-operating revenues, thereby violating H&SC section 1793.21(t). At the time of review, California Department of Social Services (CDSS) financial analyst, Jennifer Houston, contacted CDLC CEO Dave Johnson to understand how the Disclosure Statement figures were prepared. Mr. Johnson provided a reconciliation of the relevant line items used to calculate Operating Income. According to CDLC, the Operating Income figure included the following items from the Fiscal Year Ending (FYE) 2023 Audited Financial Statements: · Resident Revenue (excluding entrance fee amortization) · Investment and Dividend Income · Realized Gains from Investments · Gains and Support Upon review, these figures reconciled with the audited financial statements. One discrepancy was noted: CDLC reported $176,000 in contributions on the Disclosure Statement, compared to $340,000 reported in the audited financials. It is important to note that while the term “Operating Income” is not explicitly defined in the Continuing Care statutes, or under frameworks like Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) or IRS guidelines, it is commonly understood to reflect income from core operational activities, typically excluding non-operating items such as investment gains and interest income. However, there is no statutory or regulatory provision that explicitly prohibits the inclusion of such items in the Disclosure Statement calculation. The FYE 2023 Audited Financial Statements and the reconciliations provided by CDLC align with the financial figures included in the Disclosure Statement. CDLC’s Consolidated Statement of Activities separates Revenue and Support from Other Support, and these figures correspond to those used in the Disclosure Statement. (Report Continued on LIC 9099C...) Per H&SC section 1789.1(2), the Disclosure Statement must include detailed financial information, including operating income (excluding amortization of entrance fees), operating expenses, net income from operations, interest expense, unrestricted contributions, and other specified data. The reviewed documentation supports that CDLC substantially complied with these requirements. Based on the documentation reviewed, including audited financial statements and reconciliations provided by the provider, the allegation that Casa de las Campanas materially misrepresented its financial position is unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report sent to the Executive Director via e-mail to sign and return a copy to CCCB either by fax or email, a copy should be retained for facility records as well.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 1, 2025 · control 08-AS-20231128124359
Feb 13, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Annual ContinuationReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Annual Continuation
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Dang Nguyen conducted an unannounced visit to continue a Required Annual Inspection which began on 01/21/2025. LPA was welcomed by, identified himself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Director of Residential Health Shila Jurado. According to the facility’s license, the facility has a maximum capacity for five-hundred eighty-two (582) residents, of which two-hundred twenty-seven (227) may be non-ambulatory but none may be bedridden, and of which twenty (20) may be under hospice care. Per LPA observation, review of sampled LIC602 Physician’s Reports, facility records, and staff interviews: During this annual inspection, there were a total of four-hundred eighty-two (482) residents in care, of whom one-hundred nineteen (119) were non-ambulatory, and none were bedridden. Six (6) of the residents were under hospice care. The facility’s license included endorsement for use of delayed-egress doors in the facility’s dementia-care unit. During this inspection, LPA observed and tested the function of the two (2) delayed-egress doors, finding they were operational and consistent with regulatory requirements. LPA reviewed records for multiple residents and multiple staff. LPA interviewed multiple residents and multiple staff. LPA, accompanied by Licensee’s staff, also toured the interior and exterior of the facility, and inspected common areas and multiple resident rooms. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Resident bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Multiple resident pendant, push-button, and pull-cord call devices were tested; all successfully transmitted signals to staff pagers/devices and were able to be reset. Doors, windows and screens, toilets, and showers were working. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and resident activities. The facility’s ambient internal temperature was complaint at 74 F. [CONTINUED ON LIC 809] [CONTINUED FROM LIC 809] Where tested, hot water temperature at taps accessible to residents were all compliant: Bedroom #1 Sink was 112.5 F, Bedroom #15 Sink was 113.4 F, Bedroom #17 Sink was 112.1 F, Bedroom #475 Sink was 111.2 F, Bedroom #482 Sink was 109.6 F, Bedroom #485 Sink was 111.6 F, and Bedroom #488 Sink was 112.1 F. Appliances to preserve perishable food were also all compliant in temperature: Main Kitchen Walk-In Refrigerators were 40 F or colder, and Main Kitchen Walk-In Freezers were 0 F or colder. Assisted Living, Memory Care, and Medication Room Refrigerators and Freezers were also complaint in temperature. There was at least two (2) days of perishable food, and at least seven (7) days non-perishable food present, all safely stored. Plenty of cooking and dining equipment and utensils were present. There were no sharp objects, toxic chemicals/poisons, active fireplaces, or open-faced heaters accessible to residents. Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. Confidential records were stored in locked areas. The facility’s swimming pools were secured behind locked fences and gates, consistent with regulation. Per the Licensee, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Fire detection system, carbon monoxide detectors, nighttime lighting, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all working. The facility’s fire extinguishers were serviced within the last twelve (12) months. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. Fire/disaster drills were performed at required intervals. There were reserve supplies of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) and staff had been trained on PPE within the last twelve (12) months. Licensee presented proof of current business liability insurance. No deficiencies were cited during this annual inspection. However, LPA issued one (1) Technical Violation (TV) regarding adding three (3) more stairwell evacuation chairs (refer to the LIC9102-TA page); the facility presently has sixteen (16) of these chairs. An exit interview was conducted with Shila Jurado, to whom a copy of this report, the LIC9102-TV page, and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided during today’s visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 13, 2025
Jan 21, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Dang Nguyen conducted an unannounced visit to conduct a Required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was welcomed by, identified himself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Director of Residential Health Shila Jurado. During today’s visit, LPA briefly toured the facility, reviewed staff records, and interviewed staff. No deficiencies were cited during today’s visit. Due to time constraints, a return visit on a subsequent day is needed to complete the annual inspection. An exit interview was conducted with the Jurado, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided during the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 21, 2025
20242 state visits · 2 documents
Mar 7, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Provider made material representation about accepted heathcare and changes to the Continuing Care Contracts that were not previously approved by residents or the Continuing Care Contracts Bureau
Complainant alleges that the Provider made material misrepresentation about accepted healthcare and changes were made to the Continuing Care Contracts that were not previously approved by residents or the Continuing Care Contracts Bureau. The Department interviewed complainant and Kim Dominy, Executive Director and reviewed the Continuing Care Contract, Quick Guide: Insurance for Health Center Stays and documentation that was provided to Casa residents regarding Medicare vs Medicare Advantage HMOs. The continuing care contract required residents to “enroll at your own expense in Medicare (Parts A and B)”. Furthermore, the contract states “If you choose HMO coverage rather than Medicare, Casa reserves the right to charge you market rates for any services you receive”. On September 22, 2023, Provider provided a Quick Guide which included a list of approved insurers and insurance companies that will no longer be contracted with Casa effective January 1, 2024. The document clarifying coverage does not constitute a change of the contract. Sections IV(F) and (J) of the Casa Contract provide that Casa de las Campanas is able to be paid for its services by Medicare or from a third party on similar terms and at the same rate, requiring residents to obtain Medicare Parts A and B or the equivalent. Thus the Casa Contract properly reserved for the provider the right to reject Medicare Advantage HMO type polices. Based on the review and investigation the Department finds the allegation “unsubstantiated”. Complaint finding were delivered telephonically and LIC 9099 was signed and emailed. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 7, 2024 · control 08-AS-20231115144424
Jan 11, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Amy Rodgers, made an unannounced visit to conduct the required One-Year Inspection to ensure substantial compliance with Title 22 regulations. LPA Rodgers was granted entry into the facility by Director of Residential Continuing Care Shila Jurado, identifying herself and stating the purpose of the inspection. This facility serves five hundred eighty-two (582) residents 60 and above; of which two hundred twenty seven (227) may be non-ambulatory. Twenty-seven (27) whom may be Dementia Residents in the delayed egress unit. Approved hospice waiver for twenty (20). A tour of the facility was conducted which included a sample of resident units, the dining area, recreation rooms, and food storage areas. This a muti-story, muti-unit complex with memory care on the ground level of the ‘Sur” building. Facility does feature delayed egress doors or a locked perimeter in the memory care unit. There are 3 pools on site, of which two are located outdoors. All pools on site are only accessible by key. Each resident had clean and sufficient bed linens. All residents’ rooms were equipped with required furnishings. Lighting was present in the bedrooms. Residents’ bathrooms were observed to be sanitary and operational. Toilets and showers were equipped with grab bars. Hot water temperature in residents’ bathrooms were compliant. Carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all working. Fire extinguisher(s) were in working order. LPA reviewed fire clearance inspections documents as well as inspections logs for generators. First aid bag(s) were complete and readily accessible in all the medical rooms. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. PPE supplies are on site. Passageways were free from obstructions. [CONTINUED ON LIC 809-C] [CONTINUED FROM LIC 809] Facility has a two-day supply of perishable food and a seven-day supply of nonperishable food items. Emergency food supplies were kept in a underground garage locked storage area. Food supply is replenished frequently by outside vendors. Food was observed to be properly stored and labeled. The food service area was observed to be neat and clean. Food menus and activities schedule were posted. Chemicals and cleaning supplies were stored in a locked closed room not assessable to residents. Centrally stored medications were properly stored and locked in cabinets. Medication logs and medications reviewed were current and medications appear to be administered according to the label instructions. Staff records review verified that all staff records were complete and compliant. Resident records were reviewed and confirmed compliant. Administrator’s certification is current. LPA reviewed the theft and loss policy and procedures. LPA conducted a review of In-service training procedures. Transportation procedures are compliant. There is designated gym area and several large activity rooms as well as gathering areas throughout the facility. At the time of visit, LPA observed one large group activities in which many residents in the memory care unit were participating. LPA observed that residents were being treated with dignity by staff, and there were sufficient staff on duty to meet resident’s needs. No deficiencies were issued at the time of visit. An exit interview was conducted with Executive Director Kimberly Dominy to whom copies of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided at the conclusion of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 11, 2024
20231 state visit · 1 document
Nov 27, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff drinking while on duty
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Sabel Martinez, conducted an unannounced complaint investigation to conduct additional interviews, and deliver complaint findings. The LPA introduced himself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Administrator Brooke Harris. Throughout the investigation, the Department secured pertinent records and conducted interviews with internal and external sources. It was alleged staff were drinking while on duty. On 7/17/23, It was reported to the department that during a meeting, staff had consumed alcohol prior to returning to their regular duties. Interviews with internal sources revealed an additional incident where it was reported staff may have consumed alcohol. Additional interviews denied the consumption of alcohol while on duty, or did not corroborate staff had witnessed any staff had consumed any alcohol while on duty. Unsubstantiated Based on the evidence gathered, there was not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation occurred, therefore, the allegation was unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted with Harris, to whom a copy of this report, and Licensee/Appeals Rights (LIC 9058) were provided via electronic mail. An electronic mail read receipt confirms the documents were received by the administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 27, 2023 · control 08-AS-20230717163138
Earlier years2022 to 2023 · 8 documents
20234 state visits · 4 documents
Oct 25, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Neglect/Lack of Supervision resulted in resident sustaining injury
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ramon Serrano conducted an unannounced visit to deliver investigative findings. LPA was granted entry into the facility and met with Executive Director Kim Dominy, to whom LPA explained the purpose of the visit. Community Care Licensing (CCL) has investigated the above listed complaint allegation. The investigation consisted of LPA observation, review of records and interviews. It was alleged that Neglect and or Lack of Supervision resulted in resident sustaining injury. It was reported that Resident 1 (R1) (an LIC 811 Confidential Names List was provided to the facility representative to identify the resident) sustained a "suspicious" laceration on R1's upper left arm. Records review revealed the injury R1 sustained was documented on the internal staffing notes on September 8, 2023. On the same day, September 8, 2023, R1's hospice physician sent written orders for R1's skin tear injury. R1's physicians report revealed R1 develops one skin tear almost weekly and requires assistance with wound care. Unsubstantiated LPA visited the facility on October 3, 2023 and found R1 in the common area participating in group physical fitness activities. R1 appeared well groomed with no noticeable injuries on R1's body. R1 appeared alert and did not appear in pain or distress. Interview with outside agency revealed that on September 27, 2023 they visited R1 and they did not observe any marks, bruises, or trauma on R1's person. Outside agency stated that from their observation the staff to resident ratio in the memory care was "good." Outside agency further stated that R1's demeanor did not look like R1 had any concern. Outside agency stated that R1 looked content, more then anything. Interview with Director of Continuing Care revealed there is a 24 hour nurse in R1's unit which is always fully staffed. Director further stated that their are camera monitors in the; director's, nurses and supervisors office which provides "extra eyes" on the unit floor. Director stated that due to the location of the skin tear on R1's arm, it was found at the end of the day when R1 was being undressed by staff. Once the injury was found by staff, hospice was immediately notified and hospice responded with Doctor's orders. Based upon the foregoing, the above listed allegation is unsubstantiated. This finding means that the preponderance of the evidence standard has not been met and the allegation is not valid. An exit interview was conducted with Kim Dominy. A copy of this report along with licensee rights (LIC 9058, 3/22) was provided to Kim Dominy whose signature below verifies receipt of these rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 25, 2023 · control 08-AS-20230928085817
Sep 20, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Licensee did not provide adequate notice for fee increase
Complainant alleges that the Provider did not provide adequate notice of fee increase to residents which is in violation of Health & Safety Code (H&SC) §1771.8(d). The Department interviewed the complainant, Bob Lange, former Resident Representative, and Kim Dominy, Executive Director – CdlC on July 17, 2023, July 18, 2023 and August 3, 2023, respectively and received the following documents: • Letter to CCRC residents dated 6/30/23 notifying of MCFI increase • Letter to non-CCRC residents dated 7/1/23 notifying of MCFI increase • Memo to residents dated 6/16/2023 notifying of 2023-2024 Budget Presentation Meeting • Budget Calendar Draft 2024 • Budget Presentation 2023-2024 • Resident Forum Summary dated 7/17/2023 Upon completion of review of information provided and interviews conducted, it was observed that the providers did notify the CCRC residents of the upcoming MCFI during the 2023-2024 Budget Presentation Meeting that was held on June 30, 2023. During the meeting the residents were also given a memo as of the same date outlining the amount of increase and implementation date which was August 1, 2023. This date complies with the 30-day requirement as set for by H&SC §1771.8(d). Additionally, the department was informed that there were two residents that did not fall under CCRC statutes (month-to-month agreements) and they received written notification on July 1, 2023 with an effective date of September 1, 2023, which complies with H&SC 1569.655. (a)/(d). Based on the review and investigation the Department finds the allegation “unsubstantiated”. Complaint finding were delivered via Teams and LIC 9099 was signed and emailed. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 20, 2023 · control 08-AS-20230718163927
Aug 9, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Renita Hall conducted an unannounced case management visit to follow-up on an incident reported to Community Care Licensing. LPA met with Brooke Harris, Administrator and discussed the purpose of the visit. Community Care Licensing received an incident report on 7/27/2023 in which it was reported that Resident #1 (R1) was found deceased outside of the facility grounds on 7/26/2023. Additionally, previously mentioned report received on 7/27/2023 states R1 went missing from the facility on 7/26/2023. Per records reviewed licensee followed absentee notification plan as necessary. During today's visit, LPA collected pertinent resident records as well as conducted a health and safety check of the residents in care. No deficiencies were cited during today’s visit. Brooke Harris, Administrator was provided a copy of this report, appeal rights (LIC9058 03/22) and a LIC 811.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 9, 2023
Jun 1, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency page: Type B
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Dang Nguyen conducted an unannounced Case Management visit to cite a deficiency. LPA was welcomed by, identified himself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Executive Director Kimberly Finch-Dominy and Administrator Brooke Harris. Today's visit was in response to three (3) LIC624 Incident Reports which licensee self-submitted to the CCLD San Diego Regional Office (RO). During today’s visit, LPA briefly toured the facility, collected copies of records, and interviewed staff. Per the first LIC624: On 03/29/2023, Resident #1 (R1) fell at the facility. [See LIC 811 Confidential Names List for a description of person identifiers used in this report.] Licensee sent R1 to the emergency room via 911, where R1 was diagnosed with an “avulsion fracture” on their left elbow. However, Licensee did not send a written report of the incident to CCLD until 05/04/2023. Per the second LIC624: On 03/30/2023, Licensee sent Resident #2 (R2) to the emergency room for a change in condition involving vomiting, diarrhea, fever, and decreased fluid intake. However, Licensee did not send a written report of the incident to CCLD until 05/04/2023. Per the third LIC624: On 04/02/2023, Licensee sent Resident #3 (R3) to the emergency room for a change in condition involving severe/pronounced weakness. R3 was subsequently diagnosed with “CHF exacerbation,” pneumonia, and sepsis, requiring antibiotic treatment and twenty-two (22) days of skilled nursing care. However, Licensee did not send a written report of the incident to CCLD until 05/04/2023. [CONTINUED ON LIC 809-C] [CONTINUED FROM LIC 809] A preponderance of evidence exists to show that Licensee did not meet reporting requirements. A deficiency was cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22 (refer to the attached LIC 809-D). A Plan of Correction was jointly developed with the Licensee. An exit interview was conducted with Finch-Dominy and Harris, to whom a copy of this report, the LIC 809-D, the LIC811 Confidential Names List, and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided during the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 1, 2023
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87211(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 1, 2023
87211 Reporting Requirements: “(a)(1) A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency and to the person responsible for the resident within seven days of the occurrence of any of the events specified…below: (D) Any incident which threatens the welfare, safety or health of any resident…” This requirement was not met, as evidenced by: Based on records and interviews, for 3 of 459 residents (R1, R2, and R3), licensee did not submit a written report the licensing agency and the person responsible within seven days of the occurrence of an incident which threatened resident welfare and health, which posed a potential health and personal rights risk to person in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 1, 2023
Plan of correction: As of the date of deficiency issuance, CCLD had already received copies of the written LIC624 Incident Reports for R1, R2, and R3, respectively. This resolves the deficiency.
20223 state visits · 4 documents
Dec 23, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: - Facility did not ensure or arrange transportation services. - Meals are not served in a designated dining area.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings regarding the above-mentioned allegations. LPA identified herself and was granted entry by Rosalia Gomez, Receptionist. LPA stated the purpose of the visit and reviewed the findings of the complaint with Executive Director, Kimberly Finch Dominy, and Brook Harris, Residential Administrator. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews with staff and outside sources, records review of relevant documents pertinent to this investigation, and LPA observations of the facility grounds. On October 21, 2021, it was alleged that the facility did not ensure or arrange transportation services; and the facility did not serve meals in a designated dining area. Unsubstantiated It was alleged that the facility did not ensure or arrange transportation services for residents in care. A review of facility records revealed that the facility gave a variety of options for residents to arrange their transportation service. The facility’s transportation service had weekly shopping loops scheduled that included departure and return times and locations. The loop was scheduled for different locations around Rancho Bernardo, Westfield Mall, Escondido, Carmel Mountain, and Poway. On Saturdays and holidays there were no loops scheduled. Additional services the facility provided were medical transportation loops for locations in Rancho Bernardo and Poway. According to their fee schedule and records, residents had the options for a personal driver service available and contact information for Taxi companies if needed. Interview with the Executive Director revealed that their transportation services were fully staffed, and the facility still conducted their daily loops. The facility monitored residents who would use their transportation services to ensure that they were not ill when using their transport service to avoid the spread of any illness. Per the Executive Director, the facility had a contract with a transportation service at a discounted rate for residents if they opted to use those services. According to the Executive Director, the staff assisted residents with uploading the application onto their mobile device and showed residents how to use the application. If the residents needed further assistance, the staff would assist the residents with scheduling their transport service. During a tour of the facility on October 28, 2021, LPA observed Taxi contact information, weekly loop around schedule, Casa Medical Transportation Loop schedule, and fee schedule near the front receptionist desk. Based on the evidence obtained and interview conducted, there is insufficient evidence obtained to indicate that the facility did not assist residents with transportation services. It was alleged that the facility did not serve meals in a designated dining area. A review of facility records revealed that the designated dining areas had scheduled times that each area were opened and closed. Although dining areas may have been closed, they still served to-go orders. The dining areas did have records that showed that the facility was active in attempting to hire new kitchen and dining staff. Interviews were inconsistent. Interview with an outside source said that the dining areas were closed for a duration between 12 – 18 months. Residents were picking up their meals and having to eat in their rooms. According to the outside source, the facility had problems with staffing and keeping staff during COVID-19. Once the dining areas became opened, the kitchen area requested for resident volunteers to assist with seating and serving. The dining areas were closed only during their outbreaks November 2020 - January 2021 but resumed their dining services once they were able to in accordance with the State licensing mandates. They did have resident volunteers to assist with packing utensils in the to-go containers and assisted staff with meal deliveries. During a tour of the facility on October 28, 2021, LPA observed that the Bistro and one dining room, in the Assisted Living area, were opened. LPA observed that the menu was posted up at the door of the dining area, inside the dining area, and delivery menus were set out throughout the facility for residents if they opted to eat in their room. In review of facility records and the statements obtained during the interviews, there is not sufficient evidence to indicate that there was not one dining area available for residents to dine in. Based on the Department’s investigation of the above-mentioned allegations and the evidence obtained during staff and outside source interviews and records reviewed, there is not sufficient evidence to meet the preponderance of evidence standard. Therefore, the above allegations is deemed to be unsubstantiated. The report was discussed, and an exit interview was conducted with Executive Director, Kimberly F. Dominy, and Brook Harris, Resident Administrator. A copy of this report along with Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) was provided to Executive Director Dominy at the conclusion of the visit. The signature below confirms the documents were received.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 23, 2022 · control 08-AS-20211021142256
Dec 19, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Licensee did not safeguard resident from financial abuse.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Dang Nguyen conducted an unannounced subsequent visit to deliver a finding regarding the above prior complaint allegation. LPA was welcomed by and identified himself to Receptionist Rosalia Gomez. LPA then met with and discussed the purpose of the visit with Director of Resident Services Monica Furgiuele. It was alleged around August and September 2021, Resident #1 (R1) was being financially abused by Resident #2 (R2), and that license did not safeguard R1 from R2. CCLD’s investigation involved an unannounced facility tour, review of R1’s care and administrative records, and interviews of R1 and pertinent staff and outside sources. [CONTINUED ON LIC 9099-C, 1 of 2] Unsubstantiated [CONTINUED FROM LIC 9099] According to R1’s Face Sheet and Admissions Agreement contract, they moved into the facility’s “Independent Living” section in 2013 as their own responsible and financial party, where they remained throughout the complaint investigation. Per their initial LIC603A Resident Appraisal in July 2013, R1’s mental condition was rated as “Excellent – Active Mentally.” According to R1’s May 2013 LIC602 Physician’s Report, R1 had no sign of cognitive impairment, confusion, or disorientation. R1 was independent with personal care and medications, and was “able to manage own cash resources,” “able to follow instructions,” “able to communicate needs,” and “able to leave the facility unassisted.” Each of these features was reiterated / remained true on R1’s subsequent June 2021 LIC602 Physician’s Report, completed just a few months before the time frame of the complaint allegation. R1’s ongoing cognitive and functional independence was also corroborated in licensee’s 2020 reappraisal of R1. CCLD interviewed R1, finding them fully alert, oriented, articulate, and credible. R1 described R2 as a romantic companion who was supportive of them, “very kind,” and “a wonderful person.” R1 said R2 has never tried to steal money from them, coerced them to make any purchase, or taken control of their property against their will. CCLD also interviewed a credible outside source (P1), who corroborated that there were no unauthorized withdrawals from R1’s bank accounts. R1 repeatedly told P1 they were “in love” with R1, and that R1 never took advantage of them. P1 said facility manager Staff #1 (S1) interviewed and performed a cognitive reassessment of R1, finding no indications or suspicions of financial abuse. P1 said S1 was “very responsive” and “very helpful.” CCLD interviewed S1, who said upon learning of initial claims of financial abuse between S1 and S2, they reported it to San Diego County Adult Protective Services (APS) and the San Diego County Long Term Care Ombudsman Program office (LTCOP). S1 interviewed R1 and R2 separately, and then together, and found no indication that financial abuse had occurred. S1 said they performed a cognitive re-evaluation of R1, which showed R1 remained cognitively competent. CCLD obtained a copy of the St. Louis University Mental Status Examination (SLUMS) diagnostic tool which S1 used on R1. It showed that on 09/09/2021, R1 scored 29 out of a possible 30 points, which was within the tool’s “normal” range. [CONTINUED ON LIC 9099-C, 2 of 2] [CONTINUED FROM LIC 9099-C, 1 of 2] CCLD also consulted with APS, which independently investigated the matter, determining R1 was cognitively competent. APS said they closed their investigation after finding no indication that financial abuse occurred between R1 and R2. Based on interviews and records, there does not exist a preponderance of evidence showing R2 financially abused R1. Rather, the evidence shows Licensee safeguarded R1 by reporting and investigating the matter. The allegation is therefore unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted with Furgiuele, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 01/16) were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 19, 2022 · control 08-AS-20220301165708
Jan 4, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - COVID-19Report on file
Type of visit: Case Management - COVID-19
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Dang Nguyen conducted an announced Case Management visit, accompanied by nurse contractor Jennifer West from the Healthcare Associated Infection (HAI) team of San Diego County Health and Human Services Agency. LPA and HAI nurse were welcomed by, identified themselves to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Director of Residential Continuing Care Shila Jurado The Department conducted the on-site visit to provide technical assistance and to evaluate the facility's COVID-19 screening, testing, and disinfection processes and the staff’s use of personal protective equipment. During the visit, LPA and HAI nurse briefly toured the facility, interacted with staff, and interviewed the director. No deficiencies were cited on this date. An exit interview was conducted with Jurado, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 01/16) were provided via E-mail.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 4, 2022
Jan 4, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Dang Nguyen conducted an unannounced Required 1 - Year Visit. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was welcomed by, identified himself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Director of Residential Continuing Care Shila Jurado. LPA conducted a brief tour of the facility and observed the staff and residents in care. In accordance with the Department’s Infection Control program, LPA provided technical assistance and observed and evaluated the facility's implementation of their COVID-19 Mitigation Plan, to include disinfection, screening protocols, and the use of personal protective equipment. No deficiencies were cited on this date. An exit interview was conducted with Jurado, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 01/16) were provided via E-mail.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 4, 2022
505 of 582 beds were occupied at the August 21, 2026 state visit, the most recent — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Casa De Las Campanas/Life Care Service, LLC, licensed since 1997.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 1997, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 23
- Total complaints
- 10
- Substantiated allegations
- 0
- Type A citations
- 0
- Type B citations
- 0
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 1997, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 0 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 0 | 1 |
| Substantiated allegations | 0 | 2 |
| Total complaints | 10 | 6 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Casa De Las Campanas
Is Casa De Las Campanas licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Casa De Las Campanas licensed for?
582 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Casa De Las Campanas been cited?
0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 1997, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 23 state visits over the same years.
Is Casa De Las Campanas still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 12, 2026.
What does Casa De Las Campanas cost?
$4,450 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,450–$5,650. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 19 communities with 50 or more beds within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 21 other homes of a similar licensed size in San Diego that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,570 to $6,733 a month, and the middle figure is $4,595 (n = 21 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Casa De Las Campanas take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Casa De Las Campanas/Life Care Service, LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Palomar Ucsd Medical Center Poway is 3.9 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Casa De Las Campanas keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 20 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Casa De Las Campanas license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “CASA DE LAS CAMPANAS”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #374600488. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 582 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to Casa De Las Campanas/Life Care Service, LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 1997, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 23 state inspection visits since 1997, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 1997, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 23 state visits in that period.
- 10 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 1997, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is August 21, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in San Diego County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Starting rate
$5,500 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$5,000 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$4,100 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$3,800 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,200 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,250–$6,400On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,200 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,250–$6,400On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore San Diego County