Pacific Pines is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Redlands, San Bernardino County, California — state license #366425568, with a licensed capacity of 14, listed as closed, change of ownership in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 5 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated February 5, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

293 homes in view

Pacific Pines

The state record lists this licence as “Closed, Change of Ownership”. A closed licence cannot admit residents. We keep closed licences published because “is this place licensed?” deserves an honest answer.

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Mid-size home, 14 residents · Redlands, CA · San Bernardino County
Closed in state recordWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days · we confirm by phone before any referral
License #366425568, held since 2012 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
1438 Pacific St. · Redlands, San Bernardino County
Phone
(909) 801-1911
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 14 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 6 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 6 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
14 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 6 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 6.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 10 times and filed 5 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on February 5, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

Most recent state visit
February 5, 2026
Occupancy at the January 12, 2026 visit
5 of 14 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 2 documents with transcribed findings, dated January 12, 2026 to February 5, 2026. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 2 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 4 of 5 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20262 state visits · 2 documents
Feb 5, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident in care was diagnosed with severe dehydration.

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Sarina Ramirez and Andrew Martinez conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations mentioned. LPAs met with House Manager Annaliza Lazo and explained the purpose of the visit. The Department's investigation involved interviews and records review. It is alleged a resident in care was diagnosed with severe dehydration. The medical records confirm that Resident #1 (R1) was dehydrated but also show consistent communication among the facility administrator, R1’s family, and hospital staff. Over the span of two years of R1’s stay at the facility, both family members and staff report R1 has consistently received good care, including adequate food and hydration. A family member responsible for overseeing R1’s medical needs stated that relatives visit frequently, often weekly or daily to ensure R1’s well being and affirmed that staff provide attentive care. Medical professionals did not attribute her dehydration to facility neglect. Basedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 5, 2026 · control 56-AS-20250313143700
Jan 12, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not fingerprint or background cleared

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) E. Conchas conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings. During today’s visit LPA met with Administrator, Iren Creighton, and discussed the purpose of today's visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA interviewed facility staff and resident, and gathered pertinent information. Regarding the allegation, Staff are not fingerprint or back background cleared; Interviews and file review reveal staff 10 has worked at the facility and did not have a file available with a fiingerprint/ background at facility. Continue LIC 9099-C, LIC 9099-D. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 12, 2026 · control 56-AS-20251013161721
20251 state visit · 1 document
Mar 18, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20241 state visit · 1 document
Apr 8, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations1typical 0
Type B citations5typical 0
Substantiated complaints6typical 0
Total complaints3typical 1
State visits on file10typical 8
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 307 licensed mid-size homes (7–15 beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2012.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026221202511020241102022110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$3,500$5,500 /mo
our estimate — San Bernardino County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one.
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home is on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →

Is Pacific Pines licensed?

No — not currently. The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists Pacific Pines in Redlands (San Bernardino County), California license #366425568, as “Closed, Change Of Ownership, formerly licensed for 14 residents. State records list 5 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated February 5, 2026, was marked “Unsubstantiated” by the state.

Can Pacific Pines care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Pacific Pines with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license record14 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 6 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 6.

How much does Pacific Pines cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Pacific Pines's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Bernardino County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Pacific Pines accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Pacific Pines through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.

Medi-Cal / ALW homes in San Bernardino County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

5 of 14 beds occupied (36%) when the state visited on January 12, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Pacific Pines?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 10 state visits and 5 dated documents since 2022 for Pacific Pines; 2 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated February 5, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

2 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident in care was diagnosed with severe dehydration.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Sarina Ramirez and Andrew Martinez conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations mentioned. LPAs met with House Manager Annaliza Lazo and explained the purpose of the visit. The Department's investigation involved interviews and records review. It is alleged a resident in care was diagnosed with severe dehydration. The medical records confirm that Resident #1 (R1) was dehydrated but also show consistent communication among the facility administrator, R1’s family, and hospital staff. Over the span of two years of R1’s stay at the facility, both family members and staff report R1 has consistently received good care, including adequate food and hydration. A family member responsible for overseeing R1’s medical needs stated that relatives visit frequently, often weekly or daily to ensure R1’s well being and affirmed that staff provide attentive care. Medical professionals did not attribute her dehydration to facility neglect. BasedCDSS inspection report, February 5, 2026 · control 56-AS-20250313143700
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not fingerprint or background cleared
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) E. Conchas conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings. During today’s visit LPA met with Administrator, Iren Creighton, and discussed the purpose of today's visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA interviewed facility staff and resident, and gathered pertinent information. Regarding the allegation, Staff are not fingerprint or back background cleared; Interviews and file review reveal staff 10 has worked at the facility and did not have a file available with a fiingerprint/ background at facility. Continue LIC 9099-C, LIC 9099-D. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 12, 2026 · control 56-AS-20251013161721

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 10 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for mid-size homes (7–15 beds), computed across all 307 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
1
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
5
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
6
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
3
typical for this size: 1
State visits on file
10
typical for this size: 8
See the full inspection record on the state's site →

Who runs Pacific Pines?

From the CDSS ownership record, checked August 9, 2026.

Licensed to Integrated Elder Care Inc., who operates 2 licensed California homes in total. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(909) 801-1911
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Pacific Pines? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.