Heritage Court Assisted Living is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Upland, San Bernardino County, California — state license #366413073, licensed for 88 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 22 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated June 6, 2025 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

13 homes in view

Heritage Court Assisted Living

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 88 residents · Upland, CA · San Bernardino County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceBedriddenMemory care not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #366413073, held since 2007 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
275 Garnet Way B · Upland, San Bernardino County
Phone
(909) 204-5000
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 88 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 7 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 2 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
88 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 2 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 7.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 24 times and filed 22 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on June 6, 2025 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

Most recent state visit
July 15, 2026
Occupancy at the June 6, 2025 visit
36 of 88 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 19 documents with transcribed findings, dated July 1, 2021 to June 6, 2025. 19 of the 19 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (5), “Unfounded” (3), “Unsubstantiated” (11). 19 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 19 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 10 of 22 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20252 state visits · 2 documents
Jun 6, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not prevent residents from smoking inside of the facility Staff do not ensure that the facility is maintained sanitary Staff do not provide residents with housekeeping service Staff do not provide residents with laundry service Staff do not provide residents with clean linen

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with Facility Administrator Ricardo Lara and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews, observations, and review of records. First allegation: Staff do not prevent residents from smoking inside of the facility. Regarding the allegation stated above LPA conducted interviews with four residents who informed LPA that facility does not allow residents to smoke inside the facility. Four out of four residents informed LPA that facility provides residents with smoking areas outside the facility for residents to smoke at. LPA conducted review of record and observed that Resident #1 has been redirected by staff about the safety concerns regarding smoking inside the facility. In addition, LPA observed that R#1 was placed on a behavior plan regarding the use of illegal drugs, smoking inside the facility, and hygiene. Secondthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 6, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250305093325
Jan 31, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not prevent resident from inappropriately touching another resident Staff did not provide a comfortable environment for resident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with Facility Administrator Erika Montoya and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews, observations, and review of records. First allegation: Staff did not prevent resident from inappropriately touching another resident. Regarding the allegation stated above LPA conducted interview with Resident #1 who informed LPA that Resident #2 inappropriately touched R#1. R#1 informed LPA that R#2 invited R#1 to hang out in R#2 bedroom. R#1 informed LPA that R#1 voluntarily went into R#2 bedroom and watched TV. R#1 indicated that R#2 leaned forward and touched R#1 gluteal cleft (buttock crack), with foot. R#1 denied any sexual penetration or assault from R#2. R#1 stated that after the incident R#1 left R#2 room. R#1 informed LPA that R#2 did not force R#1 into R#2 bedroom that it was all a mutual consent between R#1 and R#2the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 31, 2025 · control 56-AS-20241218092148
20245 state visits · 5 documents
Dec 13, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure that residents have hot water.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to initiate and deliver the findings for the above allegation. LPA met with Facility Administrator Ricardo Lara who was informed of the purpose of the visit and the allegation listed above. The investigation consists of, records review, and interviews regarding the above allegation. First Allegation: Staff do not ensure that residents have hot water. Regarding the allegation “Staff do not ensure that residents have hot water” On 12/9/2024 LPA received a phone call by resident #1 informing that facility has not had hot water for a few days. On 12/9/2024 LPA contacted facility and spoke with Facility Maintenance Supervisor who confirmed that facility did not have hot water due to a water heater issue however, Maintenance Supervisor inform LPA that a service request was implemented, and that the facility is currently working on fixing the hot water concern. On 12/13/2024, LPA inspected Room (119, 120, 117, 122,the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 13, 2024 · control 56-AS-20241209081724
Dec 3, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not prevent residents from using illegal drugs inside of the facility Staff do not prevent resident from sexually harassing other resident(s) in care Licensee does not ensure that residents are provided a safe and healthy living environment while in care Staff did not provide the necessary assistance to resident to ensure that resident received Assisted Living Waiver Services

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero arrived at the facility to deliver investigative findings. LPA met with Facility Administrator Ricardo Lara and explained the purpose of the visit regarding the allegation stated above. First allegation: Staff did not prevent residents from using illegal drugs inside the facility. The Investigation was conducted by Department staff who indicated that based on records facility has general policies which prohibits all residents the use of illegal drugs, and failure to comply can lead to termination of residence at the facility. Resident #1 was issued a 30-day eviction notice due to failure to comply with facility policies regarding the consumption of illegal drugs. Department staff conducted interviews with residents regarding facility allowing residents to consume illegal drugs, six out of six residents denied and acknowledge facility prohibiting policy regarding the consumption and possession of illegal drugs. In addition, during interviewthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 3, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240619083531
Sep 18, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 26, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not safeguard a resident's personal belongings

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with Facility Administrator Erika Montoya and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews and review of records. First allegation, Staff did not safeguard a resident's personal belongings. Regarding the allegation “Staff did not safeguard resident’s personal belongings” LPA conducted a record review of Resident#1 file, during the review of records LPA discovered that an inventory sheet for R#1 was not on file and Administrator could not verify if R#1 inventory list was completed or filled out by resident/or residents’ representative. Due to missing document LPA could not verify Resident#1 personal belongings. LPA conducted an interview with Facility Administrator who indicated that all inventory sheets are completed upon admission. In addition, Administrator stated that facility does not follow-up with residents whothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 26, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240823115340
Jan 29, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not properly address resident's multiple falls at facility.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegation listed above. LPA met with Facility Wellness Director Leilin Moseley and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews and review of records. First allegation, Staff did not properly address resident's multiple falls that occured at the facility. During interviews and review of records it was revealed that Resident #1 had sustained an unwitnessed fall on 7/1/2023, a fall in which staff failed to report. During review of records LPA observed that facility did not have a mitigation plan in place to help minimize Resident #1 with continous falls. During resident interviews residents reported to LPA that Resident #1 on several occasions has fallen and in some occasions was assisted by caregivers. Based on the evidence gathered during the investigation, the above allegation is Substantiated. Substantiated A finding that the complaint is Substantthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 29, 2024 · control 56-AS-20231031091352
20232 state visits · 3 documents
Nov 6, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not maintain facility in a clean and sanitary condition. Facility is in disrepair.

On 11/06/2023 at 09:37 AM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Melody Brown and Bianca Wolcott arrived unannounced at the facility to deliver findings for the allegations listed above. LPAs Brown and Wolcott were greeted and granted entry by a staff at the reception area and were informed that Assistant Administrator Lauren Calvani was on a meeting and will be informed of the visit. LPAs Brown and Wolcott explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of observation, interviews and a review of pertinent documentation. Through the information gathered during the investigation, it was confirmed by observation, documents review and interviews that the staffs do not maintain the facility in a clean and sanitary condition. Interviews with Resident #5 (R5), Resident #6 (R6), and Resident #8 (R8) indicated that their rooms gets clean once per week, staff missed days cleaning residents room and nobody cleans their room if the housekeeping staff's off. R10 reported to LPA Brown tthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 6, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230731093552
Nov 6, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 27, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Personal Rights

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegation listed above. LPA met with Assistant Administrator Lauren Calvani and explained the purpose of the visit. First allegation, Personal Rights. During facility visit when LPA asked facility Administrator for Resident #1 records it was discovered that Resident #1 is not a current resident at the facility but rather a resident at a Special Treatment Program (STP), located at building “A”. Facility Administrator at “Heritage Court Assisted Living” confirmed to LPA that Resident #1 (R#1), was never a resident at their facility. Based on the available information, LPA found that the complaint allegation is Unfounded. Unfounded: A find of unfounded means that the allegation is false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. An exit interview was conducted where this report was discussed, and a copy was provided to Assistant Administrator Lauren Calvani Unfoundthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 27, 2023 · control 56-AS-20231026150321
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations1typical 1
Type B citations5typical 1
Substantiated complaints6typical 2
Total complaints16typical 7
State visits on file24typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2007.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20252202024553202368220225502021350
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$3,500$5,500 /mo
our estimate — San Bernardino County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home is on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2024 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (909) 204-5000

Is Heritage Court Assisted Living licensed?

Yes — Heritage Court Assisted Living is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Upland (San Bernardino County): California license #366413073, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 88 residents. State records list 22 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated June 6, 2025, was marked “Unsubstantiated” by the state.

Can Heritage Court Assisted Living care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Heritage Court Assisted Living with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license record88 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 2 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 7.

How much does Heritage Court Assisted Living cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Heritage Court Assisted Living's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Bernardino County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Heritage Court Assisted Living accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Heritage Court Assisted Living through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.

Medi-Cal / ALW homes in San Bernardino County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

36 of 88 beds occupied (41%) when the state visited on June 6, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Heritage Court Assisted Living?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 24 state visits and 22 dated documents since 2021 for Heritage Court Assisted Living; 19 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated June 6, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

19 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not prevent residents from smoking inside of the facility Staff do not ensure that the facility is maintained sanitary Staff do not provide residents with housekeeping service Staff do not provide residents with laundry service Staff do not provide residents with clean linen
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with Facility Administrator Ricardo Lara and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews, observations, and review of records. First allegation: Staff do not prevent residents from smoking inside of the facility. Regarding the allegation stated above LPA conducted interviews with four residents who informed LPA that facility does not allow residents to smoke inside the facility. Four out of four residents informed LPA that facility provides residents with smoking areas outside the facility for residents to smoke at. LPA conducted review of record and observed that Resident #1 has been redirected by staff about the safety concerns regarding smoking inside the facility. In addition, LPA observed that R#1 was placed on a behavior plan regarding the use of illegal drugs, smoking inside the facility, and hygiene. SecondCDSS inspection report, June 6, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250305093325
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not prevent resident from inappropriately touching another resident Staff did not provide a comfortable environment for resident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with Facility Administrator Erika Montoya and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews, observations, and review of records. First allegation: Staff did not prevent resident from inappropriately touching another resident. Regarding the allegation stated above LPA conducted interview with Resident #1 who informed LPA that Resident #2 inappropriately touched R#1. R#1 informed LPA that R#2 invited R#1 to hang out in R#2 bedroom. R#1 informed LPA that R#1 voluntarily went into R#2 bedroom and watched TV. R#1 indicated that R#2 leaned forward and touched R#1 gluteal cleft (buttock crack), with foot. R#1 denied any sexual penetration or assault from R#2. R#1 stated that after the incident R#1 left R#2 room. R#1 informed LPA that R#2 did not force R#1 into R#2 bedroom that it was all a mutual consent between R#1 and R#2CDSS inspection report, January 31, 2025 · control 56-AS-20241218092148

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not ensure that residents have hot water.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to initiate and deliver the findings for the above allegation. LPA met with Facility Administrator Ricardo Lara who was informed of the purpose of the visit and the allegation listed above. The investigation consists of, records review, and interviews regarding the above allegation. First Allegation: Staff do not ensure that residents have hot water. Regarding the allegation “Staff do not ensure that residents have hot water” On 12/9/2024 LPA received a phone call by resident #1 informing that facility has not had hot water for a few days. On 12/9/2024 LPA contacted facility and spoke with Facility Maintenance Supervisor who confirmed that facility did not have hot water due to a water heater issue however, Maintenance Supervisor inform LPA that a service request was implemented, and that the facility is currently working on fixing the hot water concern. On 12/13/2024, LPA inspected Room (119, 120, 117, 122,CDSS inspection report, December 13, 2024 · control 56-AS-20241209081724
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not prevent residents from using illegal drugs inside of the facility Staff do not prevent resident from sexually harassing other resident(s) in care Licensee does not ensure that residents are provided a safe and healthy living environment while in care Staff did not provide the necessary assistance to resident to ensure that resident received Assisted Living Waiver Services
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero arrived at the facility to deliver investigative findings. LPA met with Facility Administrator Ricardo Lara and explained the purpose of the visit regarding the allegation stated above. First allegation: Staff did not prevent residents from using illegal drugs inside the facility. The Investigation was conducted by Department staff who indicated that based on records facility has general policies which prohibits all residents the use of illegal drugs, and failure to comply can lead to termination of residence at the facility. Resident #1 was issued a 30-day eviction notice due to failure to comply with facility policies regarding the consumption of illegal drugs. Department staff conducted interviews with residents regarding facility allowing residents to consume illegal drugs, six out of six residents denied and acknowledge facility prohibiting policy regarding the consumption and possession of illegal drugs. In addition, during interviewCDSS inspection report, December 3, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240619083531
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not safeguard a resident's personal belongings
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with Facility Administrator Erika Montoya and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews and review of records. First allegation, Staff did not safeguard a resident's personal belongings. Regarding the allegation “Staff did not safeguard resident’s personal belongings” LPA conducted a record review of Resident#1 file, during the review of records LPA discovered that an inventory sheet for R#1 was not on file and Administrator could not verify if R#1 inventory list was completed or filled out by resident/or residents’ representative. Due to missing document LPA could not verify Resident#1 personal belongings. LPA conducted an interview with Facility Administrator who indicated that all inventory sheets are completed upon admission. In addition, Administrator stated that facility does not follow-up with residents whoCDSS inspection report, August 26, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240823115340
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not properly address resident's multiple falls at facility.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegation listed above. LPA met with Facility Wellness Director Leilin Moseley and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews and review of records. First allegation, Staff did not properly address resident's multiple falls that occured at the facility. During interviews and review of records it was revealed that Resident #1 had sustained an unwitnessed fall on 7/1/2023, a fall in which staff failed to report. During review of records LPA observed that facility did not have a mitigation plan in place to help minimize Resident #1 with continous falls. During resident interviews residents reported to LPA that Resident #1 on several occasions has fallen and in some occasions was assisted by caregivers. Based on the evidence gathered during the investigation, the above allegation is Substantiated. Substantiated A finding that the complaint is SubstantCDSS inspection report, January 29, 2024 · control 56-AS-20231031091352

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not maintain facility in a clean and sanitary condition. Facility is in disrepair.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 11/06/2023 at 09:37 AM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Melody Brown and Bianca Wolcott arrived unannounced at the facility to deliver findings for the allegations listed above. LPAs Brown and Wolcott were greeted and granted entry by a staff at the reception area and were informed that Assistant Administrator Lauren Calvani was on a meeting and will be informed of the visit. LPAs Brown and Wolcott explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of observation, interviews and a review of pertinent documentation. Through the information gathered during the investigation, it was confirmed by observation, documents review and interviews that the staffs do not maintain the facility in a clean and sanitary condition. Interviews with Resident #5 (R5), Resident #6 (R6), and Resident #8 (R8) indicated that their rooms gets clean once per week, staff missed days cleaning residents room and nobody cleans their room if the housekeeping staff's off. R10 reported to LPA Brown tCDSS inspection report, November 6, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230731093552
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedPersonal Rights
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegation listed above. LPA met with Assistant Administrator Lauren Calvani and explained the purpose of the visit. First allegation, Personal Rights. During facility visit when LPA asked facility Administrator for Resident #1 records it was discovered that Resident #1 is not a current resident at the facility but rather a resident at a Special Treatment Program (STP), located at building “A”. Facility Administrator at “Heritage Court Assisted Living” confirmed to LPA that Resident #1 (R#1), was never a resident at their facility. Based on the available information, LPA found that the complaint allegation is Unfounded. Unfounded: A find of unfounded means that the allegation is false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. An exit interview was conducted where this report was discussed, and a copy was provided to Assistant Administrator Lauren Calvani UnfoundCDSS inspection report, October 27, 2023 · control 56-AS-20231026150321
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not ensure facility is kept free of pests for residents in care.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 07/13/2023 at 09:30 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melody Brown arrived unannounced at the facility to deliver findings for the allegation listed above. LPA Brown was greeted and granted entry by a staff at the reception area and Assistant Administrator Erika Montoya was contacted and LPA Brown explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of observation, interviews and a review of pertinent documentation. Through the information gathered during the investigation, it was confirmed by observation, documents review and interviews that there are still roaches in the facility after cleaning and spraying for them was conducted. Although the facility is taking action for the roaches, as Assistant Administrator Montoya indicated, it appears that there is not sufficient treatment being done by the facility’s contracted exterminator to aggressively rid the roaches. Also, Assistant Administrator Montoya reported that the facility will have a sufficient follow up to theiCDSS inspection report, July 13, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230705120759
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedResident is being overcharged.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Anna Bueno and Michelle Echeverria conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to initiate the investigation of and deliver findings to the above mentioned allegation. LPAs identified themselves to assistant administrator Erika Montoya and discussed the purpose of the visit and elements of the allegation. The investigation included resident and staff interviews, and records review. The allegation is Resident is being overcharged. Review of LIC602A, Physician's Report, LIC603, Preplacement Appraisal, and facility needs and service care plan show that Resident 1 (R1) requires medication management and assistance with self-care activities. LPAs reveiwed admissions agreement that shows R1 agreed to grooming and bathing services. LPAs reveiwed R1 payment history from 7/1/19 through 12/31/22 and found that bathing assistance and medication management were only charged on July 2019, August 2019, and October 2019. This allegation is therefore UNFOUNDED. A fCDSS inspection report, January 12, 2023 · control 18-AS-20220111102333
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff leave resident in bed for extended periods of time.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Anna Bueno and Michelle Echeverria conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to initiate the investigation of and deliver findings to the above mentioned allegation. LPAs identified themselves to assistant administrator Erika Montoya and discussed the purpose of the visit and elements of the allegation. The investigation included facility observations, resident and staff interviews, and records review. It is alleged that Staff leave resident in bed for extended periods of time. Interviews with residents revealed that staff check on the residents regularly and residents use a call button for assistance. Records reviewed show that Resident 1 (R1) likes to be in bed most of the time. Interview with R1 confirmed they periodically go out to the community and that staff move them from their bed when requested. LPAs observed sufficient staff working with residents during today's visit. This allegation is therefore unsubstantiated. A finding of UNSUBSTANTCDSS inspection report, January 12, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230103105041

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 24 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
1
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
5
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
6
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
16
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
24
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(909) 204-5000
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Heritage Court Assisted Living? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.